联想Yoga 9i 14 2022笔记本电脑--高端可转换4K-OLED的评测
Yoga 9i是联想面向个人用户的旗舰型敞篷车，有14和15英寸屏幕的型号。我们今天的评测单位是全新的Yoga 9i 14，它配备了今年完全重新设计的底盘，它也使用了你现在能得到的最现代的技术。我们这个型号为82LU006HGE的设备售价为1999欧元，但作为回报，你可以得到英特尔新的Alder Lake Core i7处理器，16GB LPDDR5-RAM，1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD以及英特尔的现代Wi-Fi 6E模块。屏幕是4K OLED面板，长宽比为16：10，扬声器系统由Bowers & Wilkins提供。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 92.7 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
| 89 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 14.40" | 2400x1600 | |
| 89 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 13.94 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90.6 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
外壳 - 为瑜伽提供大量的金属材料
相比之下 去年的Yoga 9i 14，联想完全重新设计了底盘，现在使用了更圆润的设计。除了四个圆角之外，基本单元的侧面也是圆形的，而且是抛光金属，而金属底盘的其他部分则使用了深灰色的配色。整个设备看起来非常高贵，给人留下高品质的印象。除了我们的单位是斯特罗姆灰，还有一个更轻的银色版本。
联想使用16:10显示屏，但边框仍然相当宽，屏占比 "仅 "为78%。与基本单元相比，盖子也有点小，所以当你把屏幕翻过来时，它们并不完全对齐。当你只想把它作为平板电脑使用时，Yoga 9i 14也有点重，略高于1.4公斤。
这款敞篷车的制造质量以及稳定性都很好，符合高价位带来的期望。我们特别喜欢显示屏的铰链，因为它能很好地保持屏幕的位置，即使在较大的开启角度下也不会晃动。
对于一个14英寸的设备来说，Yoga 9i 14是相当深的，连同笔记本电脑工作室它在我们的比较组中具有最大的足迹。它的重量略多于1.4公斤，是这里最轻的设备之一。100W USB-C电源适配器的重量约为400克，比联想通常的65W设备要重一些。
连接性 - Thunderbolt 4和USB-A
新的Yoga 9i 14总共有三个USB-C端口，左边的两个还支持40Gbps的雷电4。联想还实现了一个普通的USB-A端口，所以你可能不需要任何适配器。不过，没有读卡器。
沟通
联想采用了现代英特尔AX211 Wi-Fi模块，它也支持最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准，支持6GHz网络。我们将Yoga 9i与华硕新的参考路由器（GT-AXE11000）的6GHz网络连接起来没有任何问题，传输率非常高，也很稳定。在审查期间，我们也没有注意到与其他路由器（Netgear Nighthawk AX12 Wi-Fi 6和AVM FritzBox 7490 Wi-Fi 5）的任何连接问题。
网络摄像头
顶部边框包含用于通过Windows Hello进行面部识别的红外摄像头以及1080p摄像头，可由机械快门覆盖。图片质量比普通的720p模块要好，但你不应该期待任何奇迹。附加功能更有趣。除了软聚焦，按一下按钮就能模糊背景，还有几个基于摄像头的安全功能。联想称其为Zero Touch，例如，设备可以在你离开笔记本电脑时自动锁定。当你在旅途中时，这可能是非常有用的。
维护
除了清洗风扇之外，还可以更换M.2-2280固态硬盘。然而，联想让拆卸底板的工作变得非常困难。它现在只被六颗可见的Torx螺丝（T5）固定，但还有三颗小飞利浦螺丝隐藏在后部橡胶脚下，部分被胶粘住。卸下所有螺丝后，面板仍被牢牢固定，我们建议用吸盘来抬起它。
输入设备 - 带有良好键盘的瑜伽
键盘
深灰色的键盘具有两级白色照明，由于有环境光传感器，还可以自动激活。这是一个很好的键盘，尽管键程比较浅（我们怀疑是1-1.2毫米），但按键非常精确和牢固。普通键的打字噪音也非常小，这增加了良好的质量印象。仍然有两个问题，因为底排的按键（特别是空格键）往往会有一点咔哒声，而且右侧的附加栏需要一个调整期。例如，最初我们经常敲击指纹扫描仪而不是右方向键。其他的附加键也不是那么有用，其功能如从暗色到明亮的Windows颜色模式或性能模式的切换，也可以通过熟悉的组合键Fn+Q进行切换。
触摸板和手写笔
大尺寸的点击板提供了良好的滑行能力，而且效果非常好。唯一的问题是，当你真正按下它时，会有很大的点击声，这与高价位的产品并不相称。我们建议你只敲击键盘来触发点击声。
Yoga 9i 14的盒子里还包括联想的Precision Pen 2，它可以通过USB-C充电。它不能再存放在机箱内，但它也是一支较大的笔，与普通笔非常相似。如果你做大量的笔记或写很多东西，较大的笔肯定会是更好的选择，尽管运输过程中的舒适度受到一些影响。
联想的Precision Pen 2支持4096个压力级别，在Yoga 9i 14上运行得非常好。我们在书写时没有出现手掌意外输入的情况，但触摸屏表面的阻力需要一点时间去适应。
显示屏 - 联想使用16:10的4K OLED
联想为Yoga 9i 14提供了三种不同的16:10面板（1个IPS，2个OLED），我们的评测单元配备了高端4K OLED选项。这三款面板的亮度被评为400尼特，因此差异仅限于分辨率和色域。
高分辨率OLED的主观画质非常好，除了丰富生动的色彩外，由于3840 x 2400像素（323 ppi）的高分辨率，你可以享受非常清晰的图像。OLED屏幕不存在背光出血的问题，而且响应时间极快。
当我们检查亮度时，我们必须区分SDR和HDR内容。标准SDR内容的最高亮度约为360尼特，这听起来并不多，但极高的对比度绝对可以弥补这一缺陷。支持HDR内容，但相应的Windows设置默认是停用的。我们设法在一个小的白色局部图像上测得580尼特的最大HDR亮度，而在一个几乎完全白色的图像上我们仍然测得460尼特。HDR的实现在这里并不完美，因为除了手动激活HDR内容之外，在电池供电的情况下也不可能使用这种模式。只有一个说明，即停用HDR是为了确保更长的电池寿命。我们认为制造商应该让客户决定他/她是否想在电池电量下享受HDR视频。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 361 cd/m²
Contrast: 361000:1 (Black: 0.001 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P LEN140WQUXGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti LQ144P1JX01, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U BOE08A3, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K Lenovo CSOT3 MNE001EA1-2, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -13% | -12% | -23% | -7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 98.7 | 99.3 1% | 80.6 -18% | 80.7 -18% | 66.1 -33% | 94.4 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 95.5 -4% | 99.3 -1% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.5 | 78.5 -20% | 79.7 -19% | 68.1 -31% | 84 -15% | |
| Response Times | 931% | -251% | -1450% | -1407% | -1043% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.8 ? | 58.4 ? -1986% | 58.4 ? -1986% | 54 ? -1829% | 52.4 ? -1771% | 45.6 ? -1529% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 2.8 ? | 40.4 ? -1343% | 24 ? -757% | 32.8 ? -1071% | 32 ? -1043% | 18.4 ? -557% |
| PWM Frequency | 239.2 ? | 14880 6121% | 5000 ? 1990% | |||
| Screen | -92% | -3603% | -4008% | -3519% | -3752% | |
| Brightness middle | 361 | 489 35% | 497 38% | 483.6 34% | 406.7 13% | 493 37% |
| Brightness | 362 | 479 32% | 491 36% | 465 28% | 382 6% | 453 25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 94 -4% | 92 -6% | 92 -6% | 88 -10% | 85 -13% |
| Black Level * | 0.001 | 0.01 -900% | 0.29 -28900% | 0.32 -31900% | 0.28 -27900% | 0.3 -29900% |
| Contrast | 361000 | 48900 -86% | 1714 -100% | 1511 -100% | 1453 -100% | 1643 -100% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 0.8 71% | 1.2 57% | 3.69 -32% | 3.74 -34% | 2.2 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 1.3 78% | 2.8 52% | 5.97 -3% | 5.92 -2% | 5.6 3% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.1 42% | 1.9 -0% | 3.5 -84% | 4.3 -126% | 3.6 -89% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.24 98% | 2.14 103% | 2.04 108% | 2.19 100% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 6181 105% | 6821 95% | 6158 106% | 6781 96% | 6754 96% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 2.05 | 2.18 | 1.2 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.6 | 75.2 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95.1 | 99.3 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 280% /
172% | -1289% /
-2115% | -1823% /
-2692% | -1650% /
-2387% | -1601% /
-2471% |
* ... smaller is better
我们用专业的CalMAN软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）分析了显示器，也对其进行了校准。然而，我们自己的校准即使经过多次尝试也没有成功，所以我们无法提供相应的icc配置文件。幸运的是，开箱后的画质已经相当不错了。没有强烈的偏色，但与DCI-P3参考色彩空间相比，有些颜色没有达到3的目标偏差。在一定程度上肯定可以编辑图片/视频，但性能可以更好。
OLED屏幕几乎完全覆盖了DCI-P3以及AdobeRGB色域。我们希望在未来看到一种软件解决方案，在不同的色彩空间之间进行切换，一些移动工作站已经有这种情况。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 239.2 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |   |
The display backlight flickers at 239.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 239.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
PWM在OLED屏幕上是一个棘手的话题，你必须加以区分。当亮度在51-89%之间时，我们可以检测到直流调光，频率为60赫兹，但振幅非常小，所以不应该有任何问题，我们用肉眼没有看到任何闪烁。当亮度下降到50%或更低时，我们可以检测到典型的PWM闪烁，频率为240赫兹。
光滑的触摸屏表面显然会导致户外的反射，但只要你能避免来自直接光源或明亮表面的反射，即使在明亮的日子里，你仍然可以看到显示内容。OLED的可视角度稳定性总体上很好，但从某些角度你可以看到典型的浅蓝色光泽。
性能 - 英特尔Alder Lake和PCIe 4.0
审查设置
联想自己的Vantage应用程序除了常规的Windows设置外，还提供三种不同的性能配置文件。默认设置是 "智能冷却"，但你也可以选择高性能以及电池保护模式。然而，高性能模式只是在负载下提高了风扇速度，但并没有提高性能，所以我们在下面的基准测试和测量中使用了默认设置 "智能冷却"。
处理器 - 酷睿i7-1260P
ǞǞǞ英特尔酷睿i7-1260P是一个新的Alder Lake处理器（第12代）。英特尔通过P级推出了一个新的子系列，其标称TDP为28W，正好位于熟悉的U系列（15W）和H系列（45W）之间。我们已经 发表了对新的Alder Lake-P CPU的评论，其中有更多细节.
酷睿i7-1260P使用4个性能核心（支持超线程）和8个效率核心的组合，因此它可以同时执行多达16个线程。联想设定了非常慷慨的TDP值，峰值负载为64W（这也是P系列的最高值），持续工作负载下为38W。这些数值对于一个紧凑的14英寸设备来说是相当高的。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
我们的Cinebench R15多重循环显示，第一次运行后性能略有下降，但之后就很稳定。与旧的Tiger Lake 四核处理器相比（如酷睿i7-1165G7或酷睿i7-11370H)的多核性能要好得多，可与AMD的Zen 3 CPU相媲美。单核性能很好，但新的性能核心也消耗了大量的电力。我们观察到核心的功耗高达26W（作为比较：AMD ~14W @Zen 3），所以新的性能核心的效率不高。
在电池供电的情况下，功耗被限制在52W。这并不影响单核性能，但多核结果要低一点（~10%）。更多的CPU基准测试可在 这里.
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry -8! | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 -2! | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average of class Convertible (616 - 18070, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3173 - 12150, n=27) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1155 - 1812, n=25) | |
| Average of class Convertible (308 - 1970, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1234 - 4748, n=25) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (448 - 698, n=25) | |
| Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 755, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (549 - 2034, n=29) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (165.4 - 260, n=27) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Convertible (193 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (264 - 906, n=26) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16146 - 47064, n=25) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (4064 - 5791, n=25) | |
| Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3866 - 10570, n=25) | |
| Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1436 - 1786, n=25) | |
| Average of class Convertible (319 - 2003, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 20.1, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3.45 - 13.6, n=26) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (40.2 - 65.7, n=25) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (0.4559 - 0.727, n=25) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Convertible (468 - 25226, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2176 - 10898, n=26) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Convertible (2644 - 106512, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (11015 - 56906, n=26) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Convertible (182 - 4764, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (669 - 2709, n=26) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (42571 - 82493, n=26) | |
| Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Convertible (659 - 14835, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2901 - 6975, n=26) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Convertible (1420 - 56839, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (5950 - 26376, n=26) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16041 - 92356, n=26) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1088, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (259 - 771, n=26) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Convertible (254 - 13175, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1237 - 5858, n=26) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (13261 - 43652, n=26) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
系统性能
Yoga 9i 14的主观性能印象很好。系统立即准备就绪，所有的输入都没有任何延迟地执行。我们的印象在合成基准测试中得到了证实，测试装置几乎总是领先于竞争对手。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4796 - 6068, n=17) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9260 - 11251, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6167 - 8629, n=17) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5231 - 6908, n=17) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1484 - 1811, n=16) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
| Average of class Convertible (310 - 1912, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1486 - 1755, n=16) | |
| Average of class Convertible (389 - 1790, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1451 - 1872, n=16) | |
| Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1253 - 1807, n=16) | |
| Average of class Convertible (295 - 1868, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5738 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (25125 - 71544, n=25) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (24983 - 72065, n=25) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (23512 - 66799, n=25) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1260P (77.9 - 118.4, n=21) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
我们的标准化延迟测试（网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载）显示了当前BIOS版本的一些小限制。我们还注意到视频播放过程中的一些丢帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
联想使用了非常快的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘，它也可以被替换。我们评测装置中的M.2-2280驱动器是由三星提供的，它提供了1TB的存储容量（初始设置后可获得902GB）。PM9A1是980 Pro的OEM版本，它是市场上最快的驱动器之一，传输速率超过6GB/s。除了存储容量外，没有理由更换该硬盘。更多的SSD基准测试列在 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - Iris Xe Graphics G7
我们可以保持GPU部分的简短，因为新的Alder Lake CPU仍然使用熟悉的Iris Xe Graphics G7有80或96个执行单元。我们的Core i7-1260P配备的是更快的版本，有96个EU，最大核心时钟为1.4GHz。总体性能没有变化，iGPU对于日常任务包括高分辨率视频的播放仍然是一个非常好的解决方案。
在持续的工作负荷下，性能是稳定的，但游戏性能一般来说不是特别好。大多数游戏只能在低/中设置下进行，你应该专注于较老的或要求较低的游戏。
在电池电量方面，GPU的性能并没有降低。更多的GPU基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 32422 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7654 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22887 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5215 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2024 points | |
Help | ||
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 114.6 | 100.9 | 26 | 11.2 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 100 | 65 | 36 | 14.1 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 110.8 | 83.6 | 67.8 | 62.7 | 28.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 48.1 | 26.7 | 26.7 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 61.2 | 45.7 | 40.1 | 19.8 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 59 | 32 | 30 | 28 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 93.1 | 45.9 | 36.3 | 29.2 | |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 112.9 | 53.1 | 40.9 | 29.9 | |
| Farming Simulator 22 (2021) | 102 | 45 | 33 | 30 |
排放--风扇活动频繁的Yoga 9i
系统噪音
Yoga 9i 14使用了两个不同大小的风扇，在大多数时候，它是一个非常安静的笔记本电脑。然而，我们注意到，即使在轻度工作负荷时，如我们启动浏览器或使用多个标签时，风扇也往往开始快速旋转。我们怀疑由于高功耗，芯片很快达到了高温，所以它必须要被冷却。例如，当你玩游戏或导出视频时，风扇也会在负载下达到最大速度（~40 dB(A)）。高性能模式的结果是大约45 dB(A)，而电池保护模式则安静得多，只有33 dB(A)。结果相当有趣，因为尽管风扇转速较低，但性能仍然非常稳定，温度也没有突破屋顶，所以看起来这里有一点优化的潜力。我们的评测单元没有任何其他电子噪音的问题。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.1 / 24.1 / 30 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 39.4 / 39.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.1 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512 | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 6% | -1% | 4% | 5% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 24.1 | 24.8 -3% | 24.7 -2% | 25.4 -5% | 25.2 -5% | 24.9 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.1 | 24.8 -3% | 24.7 -2% | 25.4 -5% | 25.2 -5% | 24.9 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 24.1 | 24.8 -3% | 24.7 -2% | 25.4 -5% | 25.2 -5% | 28.3 -17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30 | 24.8 17% | 24.7 18% | 25.4 15% | 25.2 16% | 29.5 2% |
| Load Average * | 39.4 | 27.8 29% | 33.2 16% | 25.4 36% | 30 24% | 39.7 -1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.4 | 27.8 29% | 44.5 -13% | 41.3 -5% | 39.7 -1% | |
| Load Maximum * | 39.4 | 49.5 -26% | 46.7 -19% | 41.3 -5% | 38.1 3% | 39.7 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
机箱在轻度工作负荷时非常凉爽，但当你玩游戏或给CPU施加压力时，一些区域会明显升温。中央和上部的键盘区域达到45℃以上，底部甚至超过50℃。在这种情况下，你不应该把设备放在你的腿上。
在压力测试中，性能再次非常稳定，CPU很快就达到了38W的消耗水平（13W用于iGPU）。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U Intel Core i7-10810U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 12% | 18% | 2% | 9% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47.5 | 46.8 1% | 42.3 11% | 43.4 9% | 36.6 23% | 42 12% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 52.2 | 40.9 22% | 38.2 27% | 48 8% | 46.2 11% | 48.6 7% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.1 | 24.2 11% | 23.4 14% | 29.8 -10% | 25.8 5% | 25.3 7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.5 | 24.2 15% | 23.5 18% | 28 2% | 29.8 -5% | 25.5 11% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
该音响系统由四个扬声器组成（2个低音扬声器位于基座的前缘，2个高音扬声器位于显示屏下方的声屏障），并创造了一个出色的、非常有空间感的声音体验。这绝对是你目前在笔记本电脑上能得到的最好的系统之一，它还能跟上新的MacBook Pro机型。不管你是看视频还是听音乐，其表现都很好。预装的杜比音频软件提供不同的配置文件以及均衡器。由于扬声器的位置，你可以在敞篷车的每个模式下享受良好的声音。
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--75瓦特的电池具有适当的耐力
消耗功率
我们对空闲时的测量结果感到非常惊讶，因为4K OLED似乎非常高效。即使在最大的SDR亮度下，我们也只测量到10W多一点。负载下的最大消耗是97W，持续了几秒钟，然后由于较低的CPU消耗而下降到62W左右。因此，附带的100W电源适配器是完全足够的。
| Off / Standby | 0.39 / 0.49 Watt |
| Idle | 7.1 / 10 / 10.8 Watt |
| Load |
64 / 97 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3840x2400, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 4% | 23% | 49% | 17% | 20% | 20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.1 | 2.9 59% | 2.6 63% | 4.6 35% | 1.6 77% | 4.2 41% | 5.34 ? 25% | 5.21 ? 27% |
| Idle Average * | 10 | 11.6 -16% | 7.1 29% | 7.8 22% | 4.5 55% | 10 -0% | 8.55 ? 14% | 8.16 ? 18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.8 | 11.9 -10% | 7.9 27% | 8.2 24% | 5.2 52% | 13.2 -22% | 10.8 ? -0% | 11.1 ? -3% |
| Load Average * | 64 | 49.5 23% | 76.8 -20% | 47.9 25% | 41.7 35% | 42.4 34% | 45.3 ? 29% | 46.2 ? 28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.7 | 58.2 -22% | 83 -74% | 38.8 19% | 43 10% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 97 | 68.5 29% | 97.3 -0% | 87.1 10% | 70.8 27% | 60.5 38% | 67.5 ? 30% | 67 ? 31% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power Consumption external screen
电池运行时间
采用高分辨率OLED屏幕的笔记本电脑在电池运行时间方面通常不是很好，但我们的消耗测量结果还可以，联想使用了75Wh的大电池。我们的Wi-Fi测试在150尼特（相当于最大亮度的70%）下运行约8.5小时，在最大亮度下仍有6.5小时。这些结果很好，与配备2.8K OLED屏幕的Yoga 9i 14相比也更好。在150尼特下的视频播放可以持续12.5小时以上。我们本想给你HDR电影的运行时间，但我们已经提到HDR播放对电池有阻碍。
联想的vantage应用程序有一个快速充电的选项，我们尝试了一下，但我们没有看到区别，两个充电曲线基本相同。在这两种情况下，充满电大约需要两个小时。
| Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, 69.9 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 58 Wh | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, 78.6 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 16% | -16% | 42% | 180% | -5% | 11% | |
| H.264 | 758 | 900 19% | 739 -3% | 593 -22% | 773 ? 2% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 517 | 816 58% | 480 -7% | 699 35% | 1128 118% | 531 3% | 594 ? 15% |
| Load | 98 | 69 -30% | 60 -39% | 146 49% | 334 241% | 103 5% | 114.9 ? 17% |
| Reader / Idle | 1721 | 3768 | 1344 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论--联想提供了一个伟大的高端敞篷车
联想完全重新设计的Yoga 9i 14绝对是一款高端的可折叠机，在我们的审查中留下了非常好的印象。你可以得到一个高端机箱，一个非常好的4K OLED屏幕，以及一个优秀的扬声器系统。
英特尔新的第12代Alder Lake-P CPU与之前的Tiger Lake 型号相比，提供了更好的多核性能，但英特尔仍然需要在效率方面下功夫。尽管如此，用户还是得到了足够的性能，但联想应该尝试优化风扇曲线。4K OLED屏幕给人留下的印象要比我们测试过的 2.我们还测试了8K版本.功耗也更低，这显然会使电池运行时间更长。
新的联想Yoga 9i 14是一款伟大的高端可折叠电脑，具有现代功能。有几个问题，但它们非常小，不影响良好的整体印象。
我们也注意到几个问题，但它们可能不会对你的体验产生影响。箱子打开起来很麻烦，没有更多的空间来存放触控笔。然而，你现在得到了一支更大的手写笔作为回报，使用起来更加舒适。我们不明白为什么HDR播放不能用电池供电。
最大的对手之一当然是更昂贵的Surface Laptop Studio.它可以配备一个专用的GeForce RTX 3050 TiGPU，但它在其他方面有缺陷（四核CPU，没有PCIe 4.0，没有Wi-Fi 6E，只有sRGB色域）。如果你使用大量的HDR内容，或者只是想要一个出色的屏幕，很难忽视新的MacBook Pro 14配备的Mini-LED面板。基本机型的价格已经在2000欧元左右，即使是带有8个核心的入门级M1 Pro CPU也已经具有竞争力，同时效率更高。
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
- 05/05/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
