Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar
Ulefone Armor 27T Pro 评测 - 带夜视和热成像摄像头的坚固手机
通用工具。
Ulefone Armor 27T Pro 是一款坚固耐用的智能手机，不仅以其耐用性给人留下深刻印象，而且还拥有多项特殊的技术功能。其中包括一个夜视摄像头和一个 FLIR 摄像头，以及一个用于连接配件的 uSmart 接口。我们对它进行了测试。Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72.2 % | v8 | 10 / 2024 | Ulefone Armor 27T Pro Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2 | 441 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.78" | 2460x1080 | |
| 73.3 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Doogee V Max Plus Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4 | 539 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.58" | 2408x1080 | |
| 79.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 06 / 2024 | Oukitel WP35 Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2 | 360 g | 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
| 79.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2 | 240 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 |
注：我们已经更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里.
外壳和功能 - Armor 27T Pro 非常坚固
Ulefone Armor 27T Pro 相当厚，重 441 克。从外观上看，它是一款典型的坚固耐用型智能手机，给人的感觉比较功利。不过，做工不错，给人留下了坚不可摧的印象。它还通过了多项认证，证明具有防尘、防水、防跌落（最高 2 米）和防极端温度（-30 至 55 °C）的功能。在外壳上安装挂绳的选择既实用又有用。
功能包括许多特殊功能。除 FLIR 夜视热像仪外，主要是 uSmart 连接器。这样就可以将其他配件连接到 Ulefone 上。其中包括显微镜（uSmart C01）和内窥镜（uSmart E02）。此外还集成了模拟无线电接收器，它不需要连接耳机作为天线，因为它已经集成在外壳中。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Oukitel WP35 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Ulefone Armor 27T Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Doogee V Max Plus (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信和软件 - 5G，但只有 Wi-Fi 5
在移动连接方面，Ulefone Armor 27T Pro 理想地使用了频率覆盖范围广泛的 5G Sub6。Wi-Fi 仅支持 Wi-Fi 5，但与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用，可提供稳定的传输速率。
27T Pro 的用户在通话时偶尔会听起来有点刺耳，但除此之外，语音质量还不错。在测试中，对环境噪音的抑制完全不起作用。
谷歌Android 14 采用的是操作系统，在测试时基于 2024 年 8 月 5 日的安全补丁，因此仍然是最新的。遗憾的是，目前还没有关于更新供应的确切信息，但更新时间可能不会很长，而且会相当不规律。即使更新到Android 15 也很有可能。
电容式触摸屏工作可靠，电源按钮上集成了指纹传感器，用于生物识别安全，工作可靠且快速。此外，还可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别，但这也有困难，尤其是在黑暗环境中。ERM 振动电机功能强大，但也有松动现象。
左侧有一个可配置的按钮，可以区分单按、双按和长按。它可以执行预定义的操作或打开已安装的应用程序。
| Networking | |
| Ulefone Armor 27T Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Doogee V Max Plus | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Oukitel WP35 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
可持续性 - 仅提供有关 Armor 27T Pro 的少量信息
Armor 27T Pro 包装在一个由层压纸板制成的大纸箱中，纸箱还采用收缩包装。里面的插页也是用塑料制成的。
Ulefone 没有提供任何有关使用可回收材料或智能手机二氧化碳排放量的信息。27T Pro 应该很容易维修，但市场上没有现成的备件。
摄像头 - Armor 27T Pro 的性能一般，但配备了宝贵的附加光学器件
摄影并不是 Ulefone Armor 27T Pro 的核心竞争力之一，因为它只有一个摄像头，效果相当一般。虽然没有超广角或变焦功能，但搭载了一个夜视摄像头和一个来自 Flir 的热成像摄像头。
基于红外线的夜视仪只能拍摄黑白图像，但分辨率很高，效果也不错。只是自动对焦速度较慢。热像仪的性能也很稳定，可以进行可靠的测量。
前置摄像头提供的图像苍白无力，细节不佳。双面均可拍摄 2k（2,560 x 1,440 像素）或 30 FPS 全高清视频。不提供 OIS 功能。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain camera4/5x ZoomLow-Light
显示屏 - Ulefone Armor 27T Pro，采用无闪烁 LCD
Ulefone Armor 27T Pro 的 6.8 英寸 IPS 显示屏四周边缘很厚，但也因此得到了很好的保护。分辨率很高，可以清晰显示内容。
亮度与纯白显示屏和减少的白色区域（APL18）处于类似水平，对于液晶显示屏来说相当高，但在阳光非常充足的日子里仍不够用。
黑屏亮度稍高，但对比度依然清晰。显示屏温度较低，色彩容易过度饱和，但这在日常使用中不成问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 781 cd/m²
Contrast: 1474:1 (Black: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
| Ulefone Armor 27T Pro IPS, 2460x1080, 6.8" | Doogee V Max Plus IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Oukitel WP35 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -45% | -32% | -61% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36.46 ? | 44.47 ? -22% | 40.6 ? -11% | 43.9 ? -20% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 16.01 ? | 26.68 ? -67% | 24.4 ? -52% | 32.3 ? -102% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | -12% | -20% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 781 | 552 -29% | 552 -29% | 600 -23% |
| Brightness | 727 | 539 -26% | 549 -24% | 561 -23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 90 6% | 94 11% | 89 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.53 | 0.23 57% | 0.42 21% | 0.57 -8% |
| Contrast | 1474 | 2400 63% | 1314 -11% | 1053 -29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 6.7 -29% | 7.22 -39% | 5.07 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.5 | 12.1 -27% | 13.09 -38% | 8.1 15% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.6 | 14 -112% | 10.1 -53% | 5.7 14% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 0.27 815% | 1.785 123% | 2.249 98% |
| CCT | 8287 78% | 7499 87% | 9036 72% | 8162 80% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -29% /
-19% | -26% /
-23% | -34% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.272 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.74 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36.46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.66 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8750 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命
Ulefone Armor 27T Pro 采用联发科 Dimensity 6300 处理器，配备 12 GB 内存。内存为 256 GB，大小适中，可通过 microSD 扩展，但在测试中速度出奇地慢。该 SoC 可归类为中低端产品，可提供稳定的日常性能，但仅此而已。
Ulefone 智能手机的表面温度始终保持稳定。我们无法检测到处理器的热效应。扬声器的声音非常响亮，而且音质不错。
得益于 10,600 毫安时电池，Ulefone Armor 27T Pro 可以实现超长的续航时间。
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Doogee V Max Plus | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Ulefone Armor 27T Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 () | |
| Oukitel WP35 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (191 - 4619, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Ulefone Armor 27T Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 () | |
| Doogee V Max Plus | |
| Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (192 - 32432, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Ulefone Armor 27T Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 () | |
| Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44657, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Ulefone Armor 27T Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 () | |
| Ulefone Armor 27T Pro | Doogee V Max Plus | Oukitel WP35 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 103% | -73% | -16% | 14% | 103% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 532.56 | 1860.16 249% | 292 -45% | 488.2 -8% | 887 ? 67% | 1834 ? 244% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 525.58 | 1611.59 207% | 149.5 -72% | 501 -5% | 694 ? 32% | 1420 ? 170% |
| Random Read 4KB | 279.08 | 239.64 -14% | 61.7 -78% | 212 -24% | 228 ? -18% | 276 ? -1% |
| Random Write 4KB | 318.6 | 225.34 -29% | 9.4 -97% | 240.2 -25% | 238 ? -25% | 309 ? -3% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Stress Test
发言人
Ulefone Armor 27T Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Doogee V Max Plus | |
| Ulefone Armor 27T Pro | |
| Oukitel WP35 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - Armor 27T Pro 是一款功能强大的工具
Ulefone Armor 27T Pro 不像是一款经典的智能手机，更像是一款面向工匠和户外运动爱好者的耐用工具。它在这方面做得非常出色：坚固耐用、电池续航时间长，并提供可配置按钮和用于可选配件的 uSmart 连接器。
Ulefone Armor 27T Pro 的整体配置非常全面，但面向的目标群体却很小。
作为一款日常使用的手机，Armor 27T Pro 依赖于相当缓慢的技术，而且只提供很短的更新时间。摄像头也不能满足更高的要求，但却拥有夜视和热成像光学镜头。
如果您需要更长的电池续航时间，您可以考虑 Doogee V Max Plus而 Galaxy XCover 7是一个不错的选择。
注：我们已经更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里.
Ulefone Armor 27T Pro
- 10/11/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
