Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy XCover7 智能手机评测--配备可拆卸电池的经济型耐用手机

调低音量。

Galaxy XCover 7 价格更实惠,但规格也比上一代 XCover 低。它拥有基本配置:保护机箱、可拆卸电池和 5G。但用户不得不忍受较低的性能。这会是好事吗?还是三星在这款手机上走了弯路?
5G Android ARM Rugged Touchscreen Smartphone

三星的Galaxy XCover 系列主要面向喜欢户外活动的用户,他们需要的手机不会在稍经粗暴操作后立即出现划痕或水渍。这也使它成为企业的一个有趣选择,因为这些企业的员工工作地点的保护措施比标准办公环境要差一些。

Galaxy XCover 7 在 2022 年推出相当昂贵的 XCover 6 Pro 之后,又回到了更实惠的价位。 XCover 6 Pro.但与此同时,前一款产品的价格也大幅下降,XCover 7 在某些方面明显弱于前者。在这篇评测中,我们将仔细分析这款新型户外手机的表现如何,是否物有所值。

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Galaxy XCover Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, PLS, Gorilla Glass Victus+, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 106 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated, up to 1TB) , NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, gyroscope, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n71/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 10.2 x 169 x 80.1
Battery
4050 mAh Lithium-Ion, 15 Watt charging
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, dual LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.0
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, SAR:1.079W/​kg Head, 1.103W/​kg Body; IP68-certified, MIL-STD-810H-certified; eSIM support, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
240 g
Price
359 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
79.1 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2
240 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2408x1080
81.9 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
235 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
82.3 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Nokia XR21
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
231 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.49"2400x1080
79.7 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
CAT S75
Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256
268 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.58"2408x1080
78.1 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Gigaset GX4
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
270 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.10"1560x720

XCover 7 是一款保护性能非常出色的智能手机。它的主摄像头和屏幕都是内陷式的,可以防止划伤。屏幕还受到康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus+ 的保护--这是为三星开发的 Victus 玻璃的特殊变体。它还没有达到最新的 Victus 2 的稳定性,但也被用于 Galaxy S22应该能提供不错的保护。

三星的智能手机通过了 IP68 和 MIL-STD-810H 标准认证,可以防止灰尘进入,只要不浸入太深的淡水中,也不会造成损坏。手机还能轻松承受从胸部高度跌落,并能定期用消毒剂清洗。

该设备的尺寸与 Galaxy XCover 6 Pro厚度仅为 10.2 毫米,是一款相当轻薄的户外手机。手机重量为 240 克,易于握持,不会感到疲倦。

当对屏幕施加压力时,屏幕会出现波纹,用手可以使手机轻微翘起,导致后盖发出吱吱嘎嘎的声音。总体而言,这款手机还是相当坚固的,不过如果三星再细心一些,它还可以更加值得信赖。

这款手机只有黑色,XCover 大键和主摄像头边框的橙色点缀让手机看起来更轻松。后盖上有四个微微凸起的对角凹槽。这看起来不错,也使手机更容易握持。但没有橡胶涂层。

尺寸比较

171 mm 80 mm 11.9 mm 268 g169 mm 80.1 mm 10.2 mm 240 g168.8 mm 79.9 mm 9.9 mm 235 g168 mm 78.58 mm 10.45 mm 231 g160.9 mm 80 mm 12.2 mm 270 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连通性 - 足够的存储空间

乍一看,三星Galaxy XCover 7 的存储规格非常不错:128 GB 的存储空间和 6 GB 的运行内存,考虑到其相对实惠的定价,已经相当可观了。但由于该手机仅使用速度较慢的 UFS 2.1 技术来存储数据,因此第一印象略有瑕疵。竞争对手配备了更先进的技术,因此速度更快。

USB-C 端口的速度为 USB 2.0,因此只能以标准速度处理数据传输。NFC 可用于无线支付和读取标签。

市场上既有普通版Galaxy XCover 7,也有 "企业版",这往往会引起混淆。就功能而言,两者完全相同,但企业版的保修期长达 3 年,并提供软件支持,可集中管理和更新许多设备。额外的 12 个月保修期是一个不错的奖励,但除此之外,"企业版 "对终端用户没有任何优势。

手机的可拆卸后盖下面只有一个 SIM 卡插槽,但用户可以很容易地在手机上设置 eSIM 卡,从而使设备适合双 SIM 卡操作。

顶部:3.5 毫米音频插孔、麦克风
顶部:3.5 毫米音频插孔、麦克风
底部:麦克风、基座接口、USB-C 接口、扬声器
底部:麦克风、基座接口、USB-C 接口、扬声器
右:待机键,音量控制
右:待机键,音量控制
左:进入键
左:进入键

microSD 读卡器

取下后盖即可使用 microSD 读卡器,它与 SIM 卡插槽没有连接。手机可以读取存储容量高达 1 TB 的卡。

在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行的试验中,该读卡器表现良好,读取速度约为 33.5 MByte/s,在 CPDT 基准测试中达到了与同类设备类似的水平。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
33.5 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
27.9 MB/s -17%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
19.3 MB/s -42%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.1 MB/s -55%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.8 (30.7-47.5)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø39.3 (27.6-48.9)
CAT S75 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.6 (23.7-44.1)
Gigaset GX4 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø29.5 (4.06-44.7)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø70.4 (34.2-81.8)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø68.9 (47.7-76.5)
CAT S75 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.9 (53.3-85.6)
Gigaset GX4 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.8 (35.3-83.8)

软件 - XCover7 将在一段时间内保持最新状态

Galaxy XCover 手机目前运行Android 14 系统,并拥有制造商自己的 OneUI 6.0 界面。这大大改变了Android 的外观和操作方式。制造商非常注重把最重要的控制按钮放在屏幕的下方区域,使单手握持手机时也能轻松操作。

虽然预装了几个第三方应用程序,但删除起来相当容易。而三星的专有应用程序则不然,尽管它们的部分功能与同样预装的谷歌应用程序相同,但总是无法删除。

我们设备上的安全补丁是从 2024 年 3 月开始的,因此在测试时完全是最新的。三星承诺提供五年的安全更新,直至 2029 年,并提供四代新操作系统,直至Android 18。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 包括 5G

XCover7 是一款 5G 智能手机。这款手机覆盖了 LTE 和 5G 网络的广泛频率,这意味着它可以在许多国家接入移动互联网。它的信号强度可能会更好:尽管采用了塑料后壳,但三星智能手机的信号强度仍落后于许多高端手机。

当然,该设备也可以使用 Wi-Fi。它支持 WiFi 5 标准,传输速率约为 300-340MBit/s。这与大多数户外手机类似,但比 XCover 6 ProPro 慢了不少,而 XCover 6 Pro 则接近完全利用千兆连接。

使用 XCover7,大型网站的加载需要等待片刻,即使站在路由器附近也是如此。图片在滚动时显示的时间尤其长。在 10 米的距离和穿过 3 面墙时,接收能力下降到 3/4,而网站加载的时间仅稍长一些。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
iperf3 receive AXE11000
325 (min: 301) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
335 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
944 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
910 (min: 677) MBit/s ∼67%
Nokia XR21
iperf3 receive AXE11000
346 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
360 (min: 326) MBit/s ∼50%
CAT S75
iperf3 receive AXE11000
345 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
372 (min: 353) MBit/s ∼51%
Gigaset GX4
iperf3 receive AXE11000
364 (min: 348) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
373 (min: 189) MBit/s ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
712 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
726 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1441 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1358 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (301-339)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø335 (319-348)
户外 GPS 测试
户外 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

该手机支持所有主要卫星网络的定位,还使用 SBAS 进一步提高定位精度。这意味着手机可以在几秒钟内定位户外位置,精度可达 1 米。

我们将手机与 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表一起骑车,实际测试了手机的定位精度。

结果是XCover 7 准确地定位了我们的路线。虽然有时会出现极小的偏差,但这种情况很少发生。因此,我们可以确认这款坚固耐用的手机定位精度非常高(尽管并不完美)。

这使它适合在需要高精度的情况下进行导航。

本地化 三星Galaxy XCover7 - 概述
本地化 三星Galaxy XCover7 - 概述
本地化 SamsungGalaxy XCover7 - turn
本地化 SamsungGalaxy XCover7 - turn
本地化 三星Galaxy XCover7 - 桥梁
本地化 三星Galaxy XCover7 - 桥梁
本地化 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
本地化 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
本地化 Garmin Venu 2 - 转向
本地化 Garmin Venu 2 - 转向
本地化 Garmin Venu 2 - 桥接
本地化 Garmin Venu 2 - 桥接

通话功能和语音质量 - 最好大声说话

三星使用自己的电话应用程序,与谷歌的标准应用程序相比,它更注重键盘。最近来电和联系人可通过标签进行访问。你还可以在应用程序中轻松屏蔽单个电话号码或隐藏来电者。

通过听筒和集成麦克风,用户和对方的通话质量都相当不错。不过,说话时声音一定要响亮、清晰,否则麦克风无法记录你的声音。

使用免提电话时,对方的声音非常大,但在最大音量时也会出现令人不悦的高音。这可以通过尽可能调低音量来避免。扬声器还会增加混响,这在通过听筒通话时是听不到的。免提麦克风只有在我们说话声音足够大时才会记录我们的声音。

这两个麦克风抑制背景噪音的能力都处于中等水平。不过,即使在嘈杂的环境中,对方也能很好地听懂我们的声音。

相机 - 像样的图像

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

手机背面是一个 5000 万像素的单摄像头,为了捕捉更多光线,它通常使用像素二进制技术将四个像素组合在一起。这将图像分辨率降低到 1250 万像素,这应该足以满足大多数需求--也许打印大幅海报除外。

图像质量一般。照片有一些细节,但相比之下,高端智能手机的效果更精确,光线更充足。风景图片在天空中显示出大量细节,而对比相机更高的画质则显示在墙壁和建筑上。尽管如此,Galaxy XCover 7 的拍照质量在同价位产品中还是不错的。

在光线不足和对比度较高的情况下,亮度很高的区域很快就会出现曝光过度,而暗部则缺乏细节。总的来说,曝光效果令人满意,而图像清晰度则较为一般。

录制视频的最高速度为全高清和 30 fps。图像质量不错,自动对焦和亮度调节在后台工作可靠、快速。

前置摄像头分辨率为 500 万像素。在拍摄细节时,自拍有些模糊,但在光线充足的情况下仍然有用。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light

我们在实验室对主相机进行了测试,在全棚照明和 1 勒克斯条件下拍摄了测试图。在光线充足的情况下,对比度可能会更高,但图像边缘的锐度几乎没有下降。在弱光环境下,您仍能大致辨认图像,但相机已无法显示细节。

ColorChecker
4.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy XCover 7: 5.18 ∆E min: 1.47 - max: 10.39 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.2 ∆E
54 ∆E
39 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
59.5 ∆E
52.4 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
63.1 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
73.5 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
40 ∆E
82.5 ∆E
68.7 ∆E
51 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy XCover 7: 45.63 ∆E min: 13.99 - max: 82.51 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不包括充电器

在配件方面,三星显得有些吝啬:它没有提供充电器,只提供了一条 USB 数据线。可拆卸的后盖使得 SIM 卡工具显得多余。

需要充电器的用户可以从三星亚马逊商店购买,价格为 10 欧元。对于公司来说,第三方供应商现在可以为多达 10 台或更多设备提供充电站。合适的替换电池可在网上购买,价格约为 30-40 欧元。

Galaxy XCover 7 的保修期一般为 24 个月。企业版保修 36 个月。

输入设备和操作 - 无指纹识别器

触摸屏每秒扫描 120 次触摸输入。这虽然比目前大多数智能手机的频率低,但仍足以确保流畅可靠的操作。触摸屏在角落和边缘的反应同样灵敏,我们可以确认,戴着厚厚的手套也能操作手机。

物理音量键和待机键位于设备的右侧。戴着手套也能轻松使用它们,而且操作点非常清晰。用户可以在左侧找到大型 XCover 键,该键可以设置为单击、长按或双击后触发特定操作。

我们觉得这个按键的驱动力应该更大一些,因为我们在拿起手机时经常会误按这个按键。在我们的情况下,这打开了设备背面的手电筒。

XCover7 不包括指纹识别器。相反,它允许使用前置摄像头通过人脸识别进行生物识别解锁。不过,这种方法仅限于 2D,而且没有使用额外的红外深度传感器,因此安全性较低。尽管如此,该功能在测试时运行良好。

纵向模式键盘
纵向模式键盘
横向模式键盘
横向模式键盘

显示屏 - 60 赫兹屏幕,无 PWM

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Galaxy XCover7 的核心是一块 6.6 英寸 PLS 屏幕,分辨率为全高清。不过,该面板的频率只有 60 赫兹。如果用户希望获得 90 赫兹或 120 赫兹显示屏的流畅显示效果,那就只能另寻他处了。

我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试证实了三星 600 尼特亮度的说法。这款手机的亮度略高于许多竞争对手,也可以在明亮的环境中使用。

黑色值相对较高,降低了对比度和显示色彩的强度。

534
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
544
cd/m²
571
cd/m²
563
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 600 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 560.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 600 cd/m²
Contrast: 1053:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.249
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Nokia XR21
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.5"
CAT S75
IPS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Gigaset GX4
IPS, 1560x720, 6.1"
Screen
-25%
18%
2%
-22%
Brightness middle
600
510
-15%
503
-16%
566
-6%
645
8%
Brightness
561
495
-12%
487
-13%
529
-6%
602
7%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
94
6%
83
-7%
87
-2%
Black Level *
0.57
0.46
19%
0.45
21%
0.47
18%
0.46
19%
Contrast
1053
1109
5%
1118
6%
1204
14%
1402
33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.07
7.41
-46%
2.4
53%
5.02
1%
8.2
-62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.1
13.26
-64%
6.6
19%
9.6
-19%
15
-85%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.7
10.6
-86%
1.9
67%
4.4
23%
11.2
-96%
Gamma
2.249 98%
2.518 87%
2.22 99%
2.248 98%
2.08 106%
CCT
8162 80%
10050 65%
6602 98%
7173 91%
10614 61%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们注意到浅灰色调中有明显的蓝色偏移,而且大多数颜色并不完全准确。

我们没有测量 PWM 闪烁。

卡尔曼灰
卡尔曼灰
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 AdobeRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 AdobeRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 DCI P3
CalMAN 色彩空间 DCI P3
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.1 ms rise
↘ 18.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.5 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

尽管屏幕上有反光,但屏幕的亮度足以让用户阅读显示内容,不过在阳光直射的情况下,这一点就变得很困难了。不过,如果你远离阳光或在阴凉处工作,这款智能手机还是很容易在户外使用的。

即使从一个角度观看显示屏,图像也清晰准确。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 更强的动力会更好

联发科 联发科 Dimensity 6100+这是一款相当新的 SoC,与其前代产品差别不大。它专为经济实惠的中端设备而设计,使得Galaxy XCover7 的运行速度明显慢于其他户外智能手机。

在日常使用中,只要不使用要求苛刻的应用程序,设备就能流畅显示菜单,系统运行良好。多任务或运行后台进程时,系统会达到极限。例如,根据用户自己的操作程序定制的应用程序需要很好的优化,因为 SoC 没有太多的性能储备。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)
989 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
773 Points +46%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
673 Points +27%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
641 Points +21%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
540 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
531 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (517 - 538, n=5)
527 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years)
3298 Points +93%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2802 Points +64%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1923 Points +12%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
1787 Points +4%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1782 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1713 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1589 - 1780, n=5)
1689 Points -1%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=159, last 2 years)
1439 Points +108%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
903 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
692 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (678 - 699, n=5)
692 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=159, last 2 years)
4010 Points +110%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2064 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1911 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1814 - 1944, n=5)
1879 Points -2%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=107, last 2 years)
797430 Points +133%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
505982 Points +48%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
394141 Points +15%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
369861 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
342965 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (300573 - 353627, n=3)
332388 Points -3%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years)
12941 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
12113 Points +43%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9180 Points +8%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9009 Points +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (8482 - 9078, n=5)
8841 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8482 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=158, last 2 years)
879 Points +68%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
606 Points +16%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
599 Points +14%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
526 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
524 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (499 - 524, n=3)
515 Points -2%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6257 Points +121%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4079 Points +44%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3642 Points +29%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
3527 Points +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2808 - 2884, n=3)
2841 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2832 Points
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10131 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
8858 Points +53%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7987 Points +38%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
6635 Points +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (5137 - 6591, n=3)
5839 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
5788 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6714 Points +112%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
4352 Points +38%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4094 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
3988 Points +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2959 - 3784, n=3)
3301 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3161 Points
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
16761 Points +510%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6594 Points +140%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4339 Points +58%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
4298 Points +56%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2749 - 2768, n=3)
2759 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2749 Points
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1557 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1280 Points
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
1276 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1159 - 1282, n=3)
1240 Points -3%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1239 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
1188 Points -7%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=144, last 2 years)
16962 Points +163%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6693 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (6283 - 6895, n=3)
6542 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6449 Points
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
5039 Points -22%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25869 Points +2521%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
987 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (905 - 987, n=3)
955 Points -3%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
953 Points -3%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
455 Points -54%

在图形处理方面,该系统也比竞争对手慢很多。XCover6 Pro 的帧速率为 Galaxy XCover6 Pro的帧速率要快两倍。需要使用对图形要求较高的应用程序或喜欢在手机上玩一两款游戏的用户应仔细考虑其性能是否足够。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
684 Points +108%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
362 Points +10%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
686 Points +103%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
373 Points +10%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
362 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2472 Points +105%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1311 Points +9%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1208 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1208 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2464 Points +100%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1351 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1230 Points
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1212 Points -1%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2986 Points +13%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2799 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2641 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2754 Points +21%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2601 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2276 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2778 Points +18%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2643 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2348 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3568 Points +9%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3468 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3283 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2984 Points +27%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2653 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2344 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3080 Points +23%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2813 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2503 Points
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
108 fps +116%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
80 fps +60%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps +28%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
50 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
132 fps +113%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +52%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
73 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
62 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +94%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +49%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
77 fps +97%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
61 fps +56%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
39 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
48 fps +118%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -18%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +124%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +36%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps +133%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +42%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +120%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +33%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +124%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps +124%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps +41%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.5 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +128%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps +44%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.6 fps +16%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5.7 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +131%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
27 fps +108%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +46%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +127%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +47%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +33%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps +146%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +50%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2.6 fps +8%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.6 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2.4 fps

浏览器的效果并不差,但这可能是由于我们测试基准的 Chrome 浏览器版本更新颖的缘故。大型网站的加载速度相当慢,图片在滚动时需要一段时间才能显示出来。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)
119.3 Points +60%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (74.5 - 75, n=3)
74.8 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Chrome 122)
74.499 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
72.887 Points -2%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
64.737 Points -13%
Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114)
62.469 Points -16%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)
133.6 runs/min +111%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Chrome 122)
63.3 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (56.5 - 63.3, n=3)
59 runs/min -7%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chome 104)
53.8 runs/min -15%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
44.1 runs/min -30%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=153, last 2 years)
112.6 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Chrome 122)
79 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (75 - 79, n=3)
77.7 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
74 Points -6%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
69 Points -13%
Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114)
68 Points -14%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
36733 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
25445 Points +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (21764 - 22638, n=5)
22293 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Chrome 122)
22114 Points
Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114)
22080 Points 0%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
20342 Points -8%
Gigaset GX4 (Chrome 111)
18658 Points -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (1984 - 2003, n=3)
1992 ms * -0%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
1985.5 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Chrome 122)
1983.5 ms *
Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114)
1913 ms * +4%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
1708.8 ms * +14%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)
1583 ms * +20%

* ... smaller is better

三星吝啬内存,只使用了 UFS 2.1 技术,而有些迟钝的内存控制器又进一步减慢了速度。因此,数据传输和加载时间比许多同类设备都要长。

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 ProNokia XR21CAT S75Gigaset GX4Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
9%
-11%
45%
-11%
-15%
130%
Sequential Read 256KB
488.2
841.6
72%
509.76
4%
991.21
103%
672.59
38%
Sequential Write 256KB
501
484.7
-3%
465.31
-7%
878.23
75%
256.9
-49%
Random Read 4KB
212
170.6
-20%
187.51
-12%
221.56
5%
171.26
-19%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
-28%
Random Write 4KB
240.2
204.2
-15%
167.51
-30%
233.91
-3%
207.62
-14%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
-45%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7Nokia XR21CAT S75Gigaset GX4Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
PCMark for Android
-2%
-36%
41%
-13%
142%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int.
464 ?(3.0.4061)
424.33
-9%
719.36
55%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int.
400 ?(3.0.4061)
413.56
3%
253.68
-37%
Storage 2.0 random read int.
38.4 ?(3.0.4061)
28.51
-26%
41.39
8%
25.8 ?(15.3 - 38.4, n=6)
-33%
Storage 2.0 random write int.
26.9 ?(3.0.4061)
30.49
13%
64.4
139%
Storage 2.0
17883 ?(3.0.4061)
19174
7%
11421
-36%
15801 ?(8211 - 20827, n=21)
-12%

游戏 - 40 帧/秒时游戏效果更佳

由于采用 60 Hz 显示屏,这款户外手机的帧速率被限制在 60 fps。但相对较弱的 SoC 只能在非常简单的游戏中达到这一帧频。要求更高的游戏,如《源氏冲击》或《PUBG Mobile》,在低细节设置下的运行帧数约为每秒 40-50 帧。

坚持追求高水平细节的用户将不得不忍受每秒 30 帧甚至更低的帧数。这意味着不能再排除延迟的可能性。我们使用GameBench软件测试帧率。

三星手机并不是为游戏而设计的,但只要期望值不是太高,也可以用于游戏。

使用触摸屏和位置传感器控制设备时没有任何问题。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.5.0_21307647_21321795: Ø45.4 (26-52)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.5.0_21307647_21321795: Ø25.8 (12-31)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.1.0: Ø39.4 (33-41)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.1.0: Ø29.5 (25-31)

排放 - 可能会有点热

温度

在长时间负载后,我们测得的温度高达 42 °C。用户会明显感觉到这一温度,在炎热的夏天可能会更高。

这种温度变化似乎不会影响 SoC。在 3DMark 压力测试中,性能也没有降低。

Max. Load
 41.3 °C35.1 °C30.8 °C 
 42 °C38.2 °C30.7 °C 
 40.8 °C35.1 °C30.9 °C 
Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 36.1 °C
29 °C33.3 °C41 °C
30.1 °C33.6 °C40.2 °C
29.9 °C35.8 °C40.1 °C
Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 34.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 %
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.3 %
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Gigaset GX4
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.2 % -1%
01234567891011121314Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.04 (2.03-2.04)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.1 (4.1-4.11)
Nokia XR21 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Gigaset GX4 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.25 (2.22-2.26)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.36 (7.34-7.37)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.6 (14.6-14.7)
Nokia XR21 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.22 (7.22-7.26)
Gigaset GX4 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø8.11 (8.08-8.13)
正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回

发言人

手机底部的小型扬声器只负责声音输出,这意味着该设备无法输出立体声。不过,该扬声器的音质还是不错的,音量高达 84.3 dB(A)。高音非常明显,用户不应该期望听到低沉的中音或低音。当音量较低时,声音会变得更加平衡。

如果你想要好声音,最好的选择可能是通过 3.5 毫米音频接口或蓝牙连接耳机或扬声器。也不要期待太多的蓝牙音频编解码器:三星通常只提供自己的 SSC 和其他供应商提供的基本格式。这款智能手机也是如此,它提供 SBC、AAC、aptX 和 LDAC 可供选择。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.637.72537.636.13130.728.84033.4295038.433.16324.525.68016.521.710015.821.312513.13016014.638.32008.642.92507.849.63157.254.74008.561.250010.163.963010.962.680010.971.7100012.672.812509.174.416009.677200010.172.6250010.868.5315012.770400013.271.7500015.271630014.375.2800015.372.11000016.165.11250016.363.91600017.259.5SPL24.984.3N0.658.9median 12.6median 65.1Delta2.99.733.837.127.936.724.335.528.237.436.744.222.240.825.441.72140.818.642.215.445.615.146.113.154.11257.412.758.211.862.312.965.410.47013.373.413.27812.178.712.277.912.979.714.884.715.886.716.180.814.473.113.675.513.581.214.474.21561.225.992.50.786.7median 13.5median 73.41.310.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy XCover 7Gigaset GX4
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gigaset GX4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 低消耗

能源管理

这款智能手机的能耗管理非常低,尤其是在高负载情况下。当然,性能也相对较低。

该设备的最大充电功率为 15 瓦。手机不附带充电器。我们使用的所有来自不同制造商的 USB 充电器都能完美工作,并在 2 小时内为空电池充满电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.2 / 1.3 Watt
Load midlight 2.3 / 4.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
4050 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
4050 mAh
Nokia XR21
4800 mAh
CAT S75
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-46%
-56%
-27%
-5%
-66%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.9
10%
0.83
17%
1.1
-10%
1.05 ?(1 - 1.1, n=2)
-5%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.4
-17%
2.29
-91%
1.5
-25%
1.25 ?(1.2 - 1.3, n=2)
-4%
Idle Maximum *
1.3
1.8
-38%
2.32
-78%
1.9
-46%
1.4 ?(1.3 - 1.5, n=2)
-8%
Load Average *
2.3
4.7
-104%
4.41
-92%
3.2
-39%
2.45 ?(2.3 - 2.6, n=2)
-7%
Load Maximum *
4.5
8.1
-80%
6.12
-36%
5.2
-16%
4.6 ?(4.5 - 4.7, n=2)
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Energy Management: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.70.91.11.31.61.822.22.52.72.93.13.43.63.844.3Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.51 (1-4.48)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.45 (1.903-2.88)

Energy Management: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.10.30.40.60.70.911.21.31.41.61.71.922.22.32.42.62.7Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø1.077 (0.97-1.336)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.45 (1.903-2.88)

电池寿命

电池容量相当小,只有 4050 毫安时。其运行时间略好于 Galaxy XCover 6 Pro略胜一筹,但无法与其他同类设备相提并论。不过请记住,电池的更换相当方便,这意味着你可以用身上的电池数量来乘以电池寿命。

不过,即使只有一块电池,续航时间也相当不错,一般情况下也能使用一天,还能播放几集您最喜爱的节目。

坚固耐用 Galaxy Tab Active 5平板电脑具有无电池模式,当连接到电网时,平板电脑可以在没有电池的情况下使用。例如,在可能对电池造成损害的特别炎热的环境中,这种模式很有意义。遗憾的是,Galaxy XCover7 没有这种模式。如果在设备插入电网时拔下电池,屏幕会保持一秒钟的亮度,但随后设备就会关闭,并且在没有电池的情况下无法永久重新激活。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
23h 25min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 44min
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
4050 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
4050 mAh
Nokia XR21
4800 mAh
CAT S75
5000 mAh
Gigaset GX4
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
36%
12%
42%
Reader / Idle
1405
1321
-6%
2344
67%
H.264
861
856
-1%
1085
26%
WiFi v1.3
803
768
-4%
875
9%
896
12%
1143
42%
Load
284
266
-6%
400
41%

Pros

+ 可拆卸电池
+ 坚固外壳,通过 IP 认证
+ 宽敞的存储空间
+ 长期保修和更新承诺
+ 支持 5G 和 eSIM
+ 移动频率范围广
+ 良好的定位精度
+ 明亮的显示屏
+ 无 PWM 闪烁

Cons

- 通话质量一般
- 性能低下
- 负载时发热严重
- 不带充电器
- 无指纹识别器
- 屏幕颜色不准确

评价--户外手机的罕见功能

评论:三星Galaxy XCover7。测试设备由以下公司提供
评论:三星Galaxy XCover7。测试设备由以下公司提供
cyberport.de

三星Galaxy XCover7 有几个优点,在日常使用中可以派上用场。首先是可拆卸电池,这在智能手机中非常罕见。这款手机还非常坚固,显示屏明亮,设计相对低调,存储空间宽敞,还有一个可分配的按键。

企业版提供三年保修,并承诺直到 2029 年的长期更新。手机的定位精度不错,主摄像头拍摄的图像和视频也很不错。5G 机型覆盖了相当多的频率,是国际旅行的理想选择。

另一方面,虽然电池是可拆卸的,但容量可能会更大。电池寿命 GX4的电池寿命是我们的目标。更令我们失望的是,这款手机的性能很差,明显落后于同类手机。面板的频率被限制在 60 Hz,色彩显示也不太准确。此外,这款手机还没有配备充电器。

三星Galaxy XCover7 价格相对低廉,但在性能方面有所欠缺。它的外壳非常坚固,功能不错,定位精度也很高。

如果您正在寻找一款性能更好的手机,那么 Galaxy XCover6 Pro可能是一个不错的选择。它的价格现在已经降到了我们测试机的价格之上。Gigaset GX4 Gigaset GX4最近的价格也不错。它也采用可拆卸电池,但没有 5G 功能。

价格和供应情况

Galaxy XCover7 目前已在欧洲上市,可在Samsung 商店购买。.

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 - 03/23/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
87%
Battery
90%
Display
84%
Games Performance
26 / 64 → 41%
Application Performance
60 / 86 → 70%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Camera
61%
Average
73%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy XCover7 智能手机评测--配备可拆卸电池的经济型耐用手机
Florian Schmitt, 2024-03-25 (Update: 2024-08-15)