华硕VivoBook 15 OLED回顾。安静的办公笔记本,强大的屏幕

华硕的全能型办公笔记本凭借两个亮点脱颖而出。一个强大的Ryzen 7 5700U APU和一个真彩色OLED屏幕。我们已经从相同的姐妹机型VivoBook 15 K513(Core i7-1165G7,GeForce MX350)熟悉了这块屏幕。竞争设备包括联想IdeaPad 5 15ALC05、宏碁Aspire 5 A515-45和戴尔Inspiron 15 3511。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.8 kg | 18.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | Alternative specs
USD 399.99
|
81 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.7 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | Alternative specs
USD 255.00
|
79.9 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3511 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.7 kg | 18.99 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | Alternative specs
USD 349.99
|
83.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.7 kg | 19.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | from EUR 999 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
机箱和硬件 - 没有Thunderbolt的VivoBook
表面光滑的黑色哑光外壳由金属(盖子背面)和塑料(基本单元)制成。该设备没有任何制造方面的缺陷。底部装置和盖子在扭动下扭曲得有点厉害。拆除底壳后可以进入内部。电池不是用胶水粘的,而是用螺丝固定的。
该电脑有三个USB-A端口(2个USB 2.0,1个USB 3.2 Gen 1)和一个USB-C端口(USB 3.2 Gen 1)。后者既不支持Power Delivery,也不支持通过USB-C的DisplayPort。这意味着,只有一个视频输出的HDMI端口可用。microSD存储卡读卡器(参考卡:128GB AV PRO V60)是同类产品中最慢的一个。
在最佳条件下确定的WLAN传输速率(附近没有其他WLAN设备,笔记本和服务器PC之间的距离很短)是可以接受的,但没有达到内置WiFi芯片(联发科MT7921;802.11 ax)的能力。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=34, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3511 (AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3511 (AV Pro V60) |

输入设备 - M513没有背光键盘
显示屏 - 由于采用了OLED,黑度极佳
光面OLED屏幕(15.6英寸,1,920 x 1,080像素)具有出色的对比度(尤其是黑色水平)和较短的响应时间。亮度值(370.6 cd/m²)很好。无法检测到PWM闪烁。
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 366 cd/m²
Contrast: 36600:1 (Black: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 2.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.27 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
97.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W Samsung ATNA56YX03-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 CEC PANDA LM156LF-CL13, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3511 BOE NV15T06, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Lenovo LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -55% | -53% | -51% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 38.09 -62% | 40.1 -60% | |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 57.3 -43% | 58.8 -41% | 59 -41% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.6 | 39.35 -60% | 41.5 -57% | 38 -61% |
Response Times | -1525% | -1290% | -1075% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 38 ? -1800% | 31.6 ? -1480% | 29 ? -1350% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2 ? | 27 ? -1250% | 24 ? -1100% | 18 ? -800% |
PWM Frequency | ||||
Screen | -185% | -344% | -938% | |
Brightness middle | 366 | 229 -37% | 239.9 -34% | 376 3% |
Brightness | 371 | 224 -40% | 230 -38% | 341 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 73 -24% | 87 -9% | 78 -19% |
Black Level * | 0.01 | 0.12 -1100% | 0.21 -2000% | 0.66 -6500% |
Contrast | 36600 | 1908 -95% | 1142 -97% | 570 -98% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 3.76 -98% | 6.34 -234% | 6.4 -237% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.26 | 5.97 -40% | 21.03 -394% | 20.45 -380% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.3 | 4.44 -93% | 2.08 10% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.27 | 3.01 -137% | 5.1 -302% | 4.59 -261% |
Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.41 91% | 2.41 91% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6338 103% | 6484 100% | 6169 105% | 6819 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -588% /
-349% | -562% /
-417% | -688% /
-813% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8529 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能--Ryzen带来了巨大的冲击
通过VivoBook 15 M513UA,华硕在其系列中拥有了一款办公笔记本,为办公和互联网应用以及简单的电脑游戏提供足够的性能。
测试条件
笔记本有三个制造商特定的性能配置文件("性能模式"、"平衡模式"、"安静模式"),用户可以使用组合键 "Fn "+"F "在它们之间交替使用。这次审查是在默认的 "平衡 "模式下进行的。一些基准测试也是在其他配置下进行的。结果可以在对比图中找到。
平衡 | 性能 | 静音 | |
---|---|---|---|
功率限制1 | 25瓦特 | 35瓦特 | 25瓦特 |
功率限制2 | 36瓦特 | 36瓦特 | 36瓦特 |
处理器
Ryzen 7 5700U APU(Lucienne)的CPU部分由一个八核处理器组成,运行的基本时钟为1.8 GHz。使用Turbo,可以提高到4.35GHz。支持同步多线程(每个核心两个线程)。
Cinebench R15基准测试的多线程测试短暂地运行在3.4 GHz,然后下降到2.9 - 3 GHz。单线程测试在1.4至4.35GHz下运行。在电池模式下,CPU运行在1.85 GHz(多线程)或1.4 - 1.85 GHz(单线程)。
我们通过循环运行Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试至少30分钟来检查CPU Turbo在主电源运行时是否持续运行。Turbo在一个中等水平上启动。"性能 "配置文件导致时钟速度略有增加。
CineBench R15 Multi Sustained Load
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Office | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ -2! | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3511 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
Average of class Office | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3511 |
系统性能
PCMark 10 Score | 5253 points | |
Help |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7578, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (4325 - 5518, n=14) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3511 |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (15867 - 39326, n=19) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3511 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3511 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形
3DMark 11 Performance | 5815 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 102899 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21511 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3248 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1306 points | |
Help |
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Office | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3511 |
The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Average of class Office (12 - 106.3, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (19.6 - 55.2, n=35) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W (Leistungsmodus) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W (Flüstermodus) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3511 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 94.7 | 84.3 | 24.5 | 10.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 55.7 | 38.5 | 17.7 | 12.4 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 94 | 75.9 | 47.8 | 44.9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 33.3 | 17.7 | 12.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 38.7 | 31.6 | 28 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 76.5 | 30.2 | 25.5 | 21.9 |
Doom Eternal (2020) | 56.9 | 26.5 | 22.1 | 21.6 |
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021) | 55.8 | 40.4 | 34.9 | |
F1 2021 (2021) | 84.1 | 38.1 | 28.8 | 20.3 |
Alan Wake Remastered (2021) | 47.9 | 19 | 15.1 | |
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 34.5 | 16.8 | 13.9 | 11.8 |
Back 4 Blood (2021) | 77.8 | 29.5 | 24.6 | 21.5 |
Riders Republic (2021) | 36 | 21 | 14 | 12 |
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 64 | 27 | 23 | |
Halo Infinite (2021) | 11.4 | 9.69 | 9.2 | |
God of War (2022) | 15.9 | 12.6 | 9.85 | 6.94 |
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) | 24 | 21 | 20 | 14 |
Dying Light 2 (2022) | 14.6 | 11.7 | 9.8 | |
GRID Legends (2022) | 49.5 | 34.9 | 29.4 | 20.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 16 | 12.1 | 8.9 | 9 |
Elex 2 (2022) | 16.7 | 13.8 | 12.1 | 10.2 |
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 17.5 | 14.6 | 14.5 | 14.3 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 31.8 | 20.8 | 13.44 | 9.5 |
排放与能源 - 华硕笔记本电脑的平均电池运行时间
噪声
在整个负载范围内,笔记本不会产生过多的噪音。在日常使用中(办公室、互联网),风扇经常不活动,安静的统治。负载下的噪音水平上升到41.9 dB(A),这是一个完全可以接受的数值。一个积极的方面。风扇启动的时间相对较长。没有烦人的背景噪音发出。负载下产生的噪音可以通过 "静音 "配置文件来降低--以牺牲计算能力为代价。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26 / 26 / 26.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 41.4 / 41.4 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W Vega 8, R7 5700U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ | Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 Vega 8, R7 5700U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3511 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3GX013N | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Vega 7, R5 5500U | Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | 15% | 1% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 26 | 25 4% | 23.2 11% | 26 -0% | 23.4 10% |
Idle Minimum * | 26 | 25 4% | 23.3 10% | 26 -0% | 23.6 9% |
Idle Average * | 26 | 25 4% | 23.3 10% | 26 -0% | 23.6 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.2 | 29.5 -13% | 23.3 11% | 26 1% | 23.6 10% |
Load Average * | 41.4 | 38.6 7% | 23.3 44% | 42.6 -3% | 41 1% |
Load Maximum * | 41.4 | 38.6 7% | 39.2 5% | 37.4 10% | 47 -14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 31.5 | 42.9 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-1.9 °C / -3.4 F).
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3511 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 4% | 2% | 9% | -4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.6 | 40 -1% | 37.8 5% | 40.5 -2% | 48.8 -23% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48.4 | 42.8 12% | 55.6 -15% | 42 13% | 42 13% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.9 | 32.4 -5% | 26.2 15% | 26.5 14% | 30 3% |
Idle Bottom * | 32.3 | 29.4 9% | 32 1% | 29 10% | 35 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
立体声扬声器产生的声音还不错,但缺乏低音。最大音量相对较低。
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
消耗功率
笔记本电脑在耗电方面没有显示任何异常情况。对于安装在这里的硬件来说,这些数值处于正常水平。测试期间的功耗 Witcher 3几分钟后下降 - 这与测量结果相符。电源的标称输出功率为65瓦。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power Consumption (external monitor)
电池寿命
在我们的实际WLAN测试中,这台15.6英寸的机器实现了6:28小时的运行时间。访问网站时的负载是用一个脚本映射的。
Pros
Cons
结论 - VivoBook 15仍有改进的余地
办公和互联网应用以及简单的游戏不会对VivoBook构成任何重大挑战--这一点由Ryzen 7 5700U APU和16GB内存的内置组合来保证。热量和噪音排放是可以接受的。
在1000欧元以下的笔记本领域,OLED屏幕并不常见。华硕正通过VivoBook 15扩大这一范围。
内置的OLED屏幕(FHD)提供了出色的黑色水平,完全覆盖了DCI-P3色彩空间。它还提供稳定的视角、良好的色彩再现、短的响应时间和足够高的亮度。然而,光亮的屏幕是一个值得批评的地方。
尽管购买价格在900欧元左右,但这台笔记本电脑有在这个水平上不应该存在的弱点:缺乏键盘照明,存储卡读卡器速度慢,没有安装2.5英寸存储设备的安装框架/SATA端口,没有快速的USB-C端口(USB 3.2 Gen 2或Thunderbolt 4)与Power Delivery和DisplayPort。电池运行时间只能说是一般,WLAN运行时间约为6.5小时。
没有OLED的更便宜
作为一个替代方案,有 联想IdeaPad 5 15ALC05它在规格和价格方面与VivoBook相似,但由于有70瓦时的电池,它的运行时间值明显更好。它还配备了背光键盘和Power Delivery。IdeaPad的弱点是焊接的内存和普通的显示屏。
一个更便宜的替代品是 Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 (约600欧元)。这款产品也配备了Ryzen 7 5700U APU,在电池寿命方面也能超过VivoBook。价格水平低的原因是内存只在单通道模式下运行,而且没有包含Windows操作系统。
价格和可用性
华硕VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA在发表这篇评论时,在欧洲以外的地区似乎没有目前的配置(Ryzen 7 5700U, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD, OLED屏幕)。一个非常类似的配置可以从英国亚马逊买到(Ryzen 5 5500U, 8 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD, OLED屏幕),价格为499.99英镑。
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W
- 05/06/2022 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck