华硕VivoBook 17（F712JA）评测。负担得起的17英寸笔记本电脑与被动冷却
VivoBook 17属于华硕在多媒体和办公笔记本电脑中的入门级系列。凭借其Ice Lake CPU和F712JA的标签， 它代表了后续的 笔记本电脑17F712FA配备了英特尔的Comet Lake处理器。我们的配置与制造商的最高设备版本相对应。16GB内存，512GB PCIe-3.0 M.2 SSD，FHD IPS面板和英特尔Core-i7处理器。价格约为799欧元（约843美元）。
最实惠的配置是英特尔奔腾金7505，8GB内存，256GB固态硬盘和HD+屏幕，价格只有一半（399欧元，约421美元）。配备Ryzen 7 5700U（VivoBook S17 S712）或Ryzen 5 5500U（VivoBook 17 M712）的AMD版本也有799欧元（约合843美元），但它们更难找到，因为这些可能是国际版本--优点是它们还提供键盘照明。
如果你想升级内存或自己安装操作系统，你可能还能找到配备Core-i5 CPU、4GB内存、不含操作系统的机型，价格有时会低200-300欧元（约211-317美元）。还有一款配备Tiger Lake 处理器的VivoBook S17，它的电池容量大50%（47Wh）。我们将VivoBook 17与竞争对手的产品进行比较：VivoBook 17惠普Pavilion 17，以及联想V15，以及Acer Aspire 5，以及联想笔记本3.
VivoBook 17 F712JA (VivoBook 17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-1065G7 4 x 1.3 - 3.9 GHz, 25 W PL2 / Short Burst, 15 W PL1 / Sustained, Ice Lake-U
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Core: 1800 MHz, RAM: 1100 MHz, 30.0.100.9864
Memory
16 GB
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel (1 slot + 8 GB soldered in), 22-22-22-52
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOE NV173FHM-N49, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)
Storage
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, 512 GB
Weight
2.2 kg, Power Supply: 136 g
Price
799 Euro
Sold in
Unspecific
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 2.2 kg | 21.4 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 77 % v7 (old) | Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 2.3 kg | 21.4 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 80 % v7 (old) | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 2.2 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 78.6 % v7 (old) | HP 17-ca1149ng R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 2.5 kg | 24.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 80.4 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 R3 5300U, Vega 6 | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.7 % v7 (old) | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350 | 2.2 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
箱子和设备。带有USB-C和Wi-Fi 6的华硕笔记本电脑
哑光的银色外壳是由塑料制成的，很容易被扭曲。虽然这不会导致任何图像失真，但有一些令人不快的吱吱声，即使你只在一个角上举起笔记本，这也会引起一些关于质量的问题。 另一方面，铰链很紧，显示屏只轻微晃动。这也意味着不能用一只手打开盖子。其他方面的做工没有缺陷。
取下底板后，尽管有许多夹子，但很容易，你可以进行一些维护。内存、M.2 PCIe-3.0固态硬盘、Wi-Fi模块和32瓦时的小电池可以被替换，风扇也可以被清洁。值得注意的是，后者只为机箱提供新鲜空气，所以CPU本身是（半）被动冷却的--在性能部分会有更多介绍。有一个2.5英寸的硬盘插槽，可以连接到主板，但你需要相应的电缆和插入框架。
大部分的连接都在机箱的右侧，所以任何电缆都可能妨碍鼠标操作。左侧有USB-2.0端口，右侧提供HDMI 1.4、µSD读卡器、1个USB-C 3.2 Gen 1（5 Gbit/s）、1个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1和音频组合端口。不支持通过USB-C充电。
有趣的是，我们测量了USB-C 3.2 Gen 1的传输速率约为10 Gbit/s。 使用英特尔的AX201，Wi-Fi 6是板载的，约1 Gbit/s的传输速率很好，但不符合该模块的潜力。µSD读卡器在测试领域处于中间位置，速度较慢，为70MB/s，而720p摄像头则糟糕透顶。
由于底部的小边框，这台17英寸笔记本电脑并不是很深，在我们测试领域的17英寸笔记本电脑中，它的占地面积是最小的。然而，406毫米（约16英寸）的尺寸也比许多具有超薄框架的17英寸游戏笔记本宽。它的重量只有2.2公斤（约4.85磅），对于这个设备级别来说是非常轻的，只是通过对低外壳稳定性、弱冷却系统和小电池的妥协来实现。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø933 (475-950)
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø604 (567-620)
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø825 (551-1155)
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø915 (442-953)
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø598 (526-661)
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1415 (1340-1589)
12.8 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
20 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
16 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
输入设备。键盘的反馈很弱，没有照明
15 x 15毫米（约0.6 x 0.6英寸），按键略小。它们提供了一个短的行程（1.4毫米，约0.06英寸）和相当不明确的反馈，并且很容易触发。 至少，压力点是明显的，这意味着在短时间的熟悉后，快速打字也是可能的。 回车键和空格键是嘎嘎作响的那种，许多键的尺寸被缩小了。
其他方面的布局都很好，但银色按键上的灰色标签使它们非常难读，除非光线条件理想。在这个型号中，按键也没有照明，欧洲市场的情况也大致如此。当施加一些力量时，键盘可以被压住，但这并不影响打字的体验。
略小的触摸板（10.5 x 7.4毫米，约4.1 x 2.9英寸）具有良好的滑动特性。集成的鼠标键的行程很短，阻力很小。
华硕VivoBook 17的锐利显示屏
华硕VivoBook 17提供一个17.3英寸的IPS显示屏，分辨率为FHD（1920 x 1080像素）。唯一可供选择的是采用过时的TN技术的HD+面板。
我们已经知道前辈们的磨砂京东方NV173FHM-N49面板，这就是我们的测量结果非常相似的原因：263尼特，它现在只比VivoBook 17 F712FA亮1尼特。竞争对手的亮度约为20至40尼特。对比度从1200：1恶化到900：1。该 IdeaPad 3另一方面，提供了1400:1的对比度，这对IPS显示器来说是非常好的。
从主观上讲，显示屏是锐利和清晰的，因为大多数时候你不会像坐在13英寸笔记本上那样靠近这样一台大的笔记本。 清晰的照明子像素也有助于提高图像输出的质量。
然而，在亮度分布方面仍有一些明显的缺陷，在黑暗的电影或游戏场景中会很明显。另一方面，我们没有看到PWM闪烁的情况。在我们的比较中，游戏的最佳响应时间是由 Acer Aspire 5带dGPU。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NV173FHM-N49 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 287 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 263 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 296 cd/m²
Contrast: 897:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.64 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
40.84% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.85% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.53% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W BOE NV173FHM-N49, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T BOE NV173FHM-N49, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE AU Optronics B173HAN04.3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP 17-ca1149ng Chi Mei CMN175E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 BOE CQ NV156FHM-T07, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 BOE084E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 70% | 51% | 0% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.53 | 39.03 -1% | 68.5 73% | 61.4 55% | 40 1% | 39.98 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.85 | 58.4 -1% | 97.1 65% | 86.6 47% | 57.7 -2% | 59.3 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.84 | 40.32 -1% | 70.1 72% | 62 52% | 41.2 1% | 41.3 1% |
| Response Times | -8% | -82% | -78% | -51% | 42% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 22 ? | 24 ? -9% | 39 ? -77% | 40 ? -82% | 24.8 ? -13% | 14 ? 36% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 15 ? | 16 ? -7% | 28 ? -87% | 26 ? -73% | 28.4 ? -89% | 8 ? 47% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 ? | |||||
| Screen | 3% | 20% | 18% | 6% | 15% | |
| Brightness middle | 269 | 288 7% | 330 23% | 327 22% | 336.4 25% | 321 19% |
| Brightness | 263 | 262 0% | 309 17% | 287 9% | 318 21% | 282 7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 83 -6% | 88 0% | 80 -9% | 84 -5% | 81 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.24 20% | 0.33 -10% | 0.25 17% | 0.24 20% | 0.36 -20% |
| Contrast | 897 | 1200 34% | 1000 11% | 1308 46% | 1402 56% | 892 -1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 6.14 -6% | 2.82 51% | 4.03 31% | 6.46 -11% | 4.3 26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.46 | 18.55 -0% | 6.27 66% | 7.35 60% | 19.75 -7% | 7.1 62% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.64 | 4.55 -25% | 3.58 2% | 4.84 -33% | 5.6 -54% | 2.26 38% |
| Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.37 93% | 2.42 91% | 2.39 92% | 2.25 98% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 6995 93% | 7161 91% | 6994 93% | 6850 95% | 5934 110% | 6650 98% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.6 | 2.09 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 63 | 56 | 38 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58.1 | 97 | 87 | 59 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
0% | 3% /
16% | -3% /
11% | -15% /
-4% | 19% /
16% |
* ... smaller is better
sRGB色彩空间只覆盖到59%。相比之下，V1和HP 17分别达到了97%和87%的好成绩。DeltaE值显然太高了。特别是绿色和蓝色的色调缺乏，而且面板被调整得太暖。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在户外使用VivoBook 17时，哑光面板的好处是，但263尼特的低亮度不足以让人在阳光充足的空间工作。作为典型的IPS显示屏，可视角度处于较高的水平。
性能。英特尔Ice Lake ，半被动冷却的CPU
华硕VivoBook 17的一个典型使用场景是在家里的桌子上把它作为多媒体和办公笔记本电脑使用。我们的配置是英特尔酷睿 i7-1065G7，16GB的双通道内存，英特尔的Ice Lake iGPU，以及512GB的固态硬盘，足以满足这些任务。老的游戏可以在低细节设置下运行。
其他型号配备了酷睿i5处理器或 AMD Ryzen-5000(国际市场)。后续机型配备的是 酷睿i7-1165G7的继任者也是可用的。
处理器
英特尔酷睿i7-1065G7四个核心的产品一般来说足以应付办公和互联网任务。
在30分钟的Cinebench-R15循环中，CPU最初以其所有的能力（3.5 GHz）启动。一分钟后，时钟速度下降到2.3GHz，并保持在这一水平，即使CPU不时地进行一些短暂的提升。在开始时，功耗为31瓦。平均为15瓦，与华硕的性能极限调整相对应。
在短暂上升到90℃（194°F）之后，核心温度保持在85℃（185°F）。在如此大的机箱中，在只有15瓦的消耗下，温度相对较高，其原因可以在被动冷却的CPU中找到，而风扇只为机箱提供冷空气。
对15瓦的限制导致Cinebench R15的分数从一开始的580分下降到第三次运行时的490分，最后持续到475分。风扇不会立即启动，因为它可能更多的是由机箱内部的温度控制，而不是CPU的温度。风扇在一分钟后才开始转动，此时CPU已经从25瓦降到了15瓦。
结果是，一个Core i3 ，只被超越了一点，而即使是前辈的表现也快了30%左右，相应的Tiger Lake -CPU ，快了60%。有八个核心的Ryzen 7 5700U ，其性能应该至少是三倍。在电池运行中，性能降低了约10%，因为在消耗方面，CPU的性能极限下降到最大10瓦。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø487 (474.61-579.98)
Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø632 (625.46-683.92)
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE Intel Core i3-1005G1: Ø404 (389.86-406.96)
HP 17-ca1149ng AMD Ryzen 5 3500U: Ø588 (568.32-652.11)
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 AMD Ryzen 3 5300U: Ø909 (902.16-915.31)
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø798 (785.79-831.69)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T -2! | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W -1! | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng -2! | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (3127 - 4281, n=3) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1050 - 1212, n=2) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1081 - 2024, n=31) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (358 - 474, n=31) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (288 - 836, n=36) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (141 - 190, n=35) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (675 - 1650, n=23) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (10406 - 22898, n=24) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (3289 - 4589, n=24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2464 - 4855, n=18) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (948 - 1348, n=18) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2.2 - 6.38, n=22) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (46.9 - 85.3, n=19) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (0.661 - 0.798, n=18) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2599 - 5966, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (11536 - 24782, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (796 - 1684, n=18) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (31314 - 42918, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1966 - 4074, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (7094 - 14868, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (29068 - 62557, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (138 - 339, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1343 - 3098, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (10972 - 36042, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
系统性能
该系统速度快，反应灵敏。程序启动时没有任何明显的延迟，用几个浏览器标签冲浪也没有任何问题，即使其中一个标签通过YouTube播放4K视频。
AMD在这方面又明显更快。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3878 - 4679, n=20) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (8302 - 9902, n=20) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (5462 - 7379, n=20) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3260 - 4424, n=20) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) () | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) () | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) () | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) () | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4039 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (19170 - 51100, n=19) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (21532 - 53870, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (20855 - 51537, n=19) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (71.9 - 111, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
根据LatencyMon，输入的延迟很高，因此该系统不适合实时处理音频和视频。这方面的责任在于Windows的设备内核模式驱动程序。
在YouTube上重现4K视频时，CPU负载为25%，GPU负载为46%，没有掉落任何单帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
512GB M.2-2280 NVMe SSD的速度甚至仍然低于PCIe-3.0水平。你可以升级到两倍于此速度的硬盘。
竞争对手和前代产品的传输速度相似。2.5英寸硬盘插槽可以使用相应的电缆和插入框架。
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Samsung PM991 MZALQ256HAJD | HP 17-ca1149ng Vega 8, R5 3500U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -17% | -13% | -29% | 0% | 27% | |
| Seq Read | 1759 | 1679 -5% | 1734 -1% | 1583 -10% | 2635 50% | 2217 26% |
| Seq Write | 927 | 910 -2% | 911 -2% | 839 -9% | 1592 72% | 1920 107% |
| 4K Read | 58.64 | 56.1 -4% | 50.7 -14% | 45.09 -23% | 43.59 -26% | 31.52 -46% |
| 4K Write | 143.71 | 153.6 7% | 134.5 -6% | 87 -39% | 113.5 -21% | 215.3 50% |
| 4K-64 Read | 458.24 | 324.4 -29% | 467.5 2% | 325.9 -29% | 981 114% | 301.4 -34% |
| 4K-64 Write | 926.94 | 792 -15% | 706 -24% | 590 -36% | 1016 10% | 1395 50% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.089 | 0.088 1% | 0.117 -31% | 0.099 -11% | 0.086 3% | 0.052 42% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.026 | 0.046 -77% | 0.028 -8% | 0.052 -100% | 0.101 -288% | 0.035 -35% |
| Score Read | 682 | 548 -20% | 692 1% | 529 -22% | 1288 89% | 555 -19% |
| Score Write | 1141 | 1037 -9% | 932 -18% | 761 -33% | 1289 13% | 1802 58% |
| Score Total | 2154 | 1849 -14% | 1954 -9% | 1540 -29% | 3191 48% | 2635 22% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1189 | 801 -33% | 774 -35% | 1173 -1% | 1438 21% | 1662 40% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 362 | 340.9 -6% | 356.3 -2% | 239.3 -34% | 195.9 -46% | 641 77% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 869 | 568 -35% | 572 -34% | 589 -32% | 567 -35% | 1266 46% |
* ... smaller is better
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Average Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø1981 (1971.11-1983.28)
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU: Ø2524 (2171.39-2607.18)
图形卡
集成的英特尔Ice Lake GPU可以在低细节设置下用于老游戏。至少，在 英特尔HD 620的前辈可以超越60%左右。AMD的 Vega iGPU在相应的Ryzen 5000型号中或 NvidiaGeForce MX350中的Acer Aspire 5更合适。
在游戏时，GPU的时钟速度为900MHz，CPU为1400MHz。在电池运行时，性能下降了约10%。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 -1! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T -1! | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2112 - 4630, n=28) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (1418 - 3156, n=27) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (526 - 851, n=23) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3550 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2057 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 743 points | |
Help | ||
The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Multimedia (36 - 428, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (28.2 - 58, n=20) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23 - 327, n=40, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (20.8 - 36.8, n=18) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (10.9 - 20.1, n=18) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| GTA V | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
| Average of class Multimedia (52.4 - 187.4, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (24.8 - 50.9, n=3) | |
| 1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (45.6 - 186.4, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (33.1 - 43.5, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11.9 - 186.1, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (12.7 - 13.3, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Strange Brigade | |
| 1280x720 lowest AF:1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (39.7 - 460, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (47.7 - 53.9, n=3) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| 1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (15.2 - 300, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (18.5 - 21.4, n=3) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| 1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12.8 - 244, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (15.4 - 17.3, n=3) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Dota 2 Reborn | |
| 1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
| Average of class Multimedia (37.2 - 233, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (54.4 - 101, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| 1366x768 med (1/3) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (36.7 - 208, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (29 - 62.8, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| 1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (28 - 196.9, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (17.5 - 38.5, n=19) | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| X-Plane 11.11 | |
| 1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (32.9 - 196.4, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (16.4 - 42.9, n=18) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T | |
| 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (10.8 - 19.7, n=18) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
No graph data
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 42.8 | 33.1 | 12.7 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 41.1 | 29.2 | 15.7 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 80.5 | 54.6 | 33.2 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 20.3 | 10.8 | 7.57 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 23.1 | 11 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 47.7 | 18.5 | 15.4 |
排放。华硕推出的安静的多媒体笔记本电脑
噪声排放
在电池操作中，机箱风扇基本上保持关闭状态，即使在满负荷的情况下，也几乎听不到它的声音。
在电源操作中，它也会在空闲时呼呼作响，即使它很难被注意到。在满载的情况下，需要一分钟时间才能开始运转。但即使如此，噪音水平仍在限制范围内，因此可以确保安静工作。比较的设备也同样安静，甚至更安静。
然而，与其他完全集成风扇的冷却系统相比，半被动冷却系统需要更多材料（铜）。这也导致了更高的重量，并且性能仍然低于CPU和大机箱所提供的潜力。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 31.4 / 31.4 / 31.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 36.1 / 40.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29.6 dB(A) | ||
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Samsung PM991 MZALQ256HAJD | HP 17-ca1149ng Vega 8, R5 3500U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 14% | 2% | 12% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 29.6 | 26.7 10% | 25.5 14% | 25.2 15% | 24.9 16% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.4 | 26.7 15% | 25.5 19% | 30.8 2% | 25.8 18% | 24.9 21% |
| Idle Average * | 31.4 | 26.7 15% | 29 8% | 30.8 2% | 25.8 18% | 24.9 21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.4 | 26.7 15% | 29 8% | 30.8 2% | 25.8 18% | 27 14% |
| Load Average * | 36.1 | 43.4 -20% | 30.1 17% | 37.7 -4% | 32.3 11% | 44.1 -22% |
| Load Maximum * | 40.1 | 42.1 -5% | 33.4 17% | 37.7 6% | 44 -10% | 44.8 -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 32 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
华硕VivoBook 17的温度仍然完全不显眼。即使在最大负荷下，在机箱的任何地方也没有明显的热点。竞争对手显示的温度一般也保持在类似的低水平。
在压力测试（Prime95）中，CPU的频率在2分钟后从2.7GHz下降到1.7GHz。有了这个，它们不会低于1.3GHz的基本时钟速度。TDP和核心温度的行为等同于CPU基准循环 。
在综合压力测试（Prime95 + FurMark）期间，CPU和iGPU的时钟速度分别下降到只有800 MHz和大约600 MHz。在电池运行时，分别只有700和400兆赫，而在此期间，核心温度只有66℃（151°F），风扇保持安静。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.9 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.9 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | HP 17-ca1149ng AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 2% | 4% | 18% | 11% | 12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.2 | 41.1 -2% | 37.7 6% | 34.2 15% | 31.2 22% | 35 13% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 47.9 | 44.4 7% | 35.1 27% | 33 31% | 43 10% | 40 16% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.3 | 27.5 -1% | 29.2 -7% | 24.5 10% | 24.8 9% | 25.6 6% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.9 | 27.9 3% | 32.4 -12% | 24.5 15% | 28.2 2% | 25.3 12% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
扬声器指向底部，可以得到足够的音量。也有一些低音的暗示。由于中音和高音发音良好，该设备适合于多媒体。我们的比较领域结果更糟。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理。华硕的小电池只在重量上有所节俭
消耗功率
待机功耗略低于0.5瓦，处于该领域的中间位置，但由于32瓦的小电池，待机一周后情况会变得紧张。怠速运行时的平均耗电量也属于中间范围，不到8瓦，没有显示出任何明显的问题。
在负载情况下，从插座中抽取的最大功率为44瓦，但这只发生在综合压力测试的开始。在这种极端情况下，平均为30至35瓦，在与CPU相关的纯满负荷情况下，大约为25瓦，而在游戏时，为29瓦。这是有效的，即使提供的性能变成了相应的低。
附带的45瓦电源是足够大的。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.49 Watt |
| Idle | 4.2 / 7.9 / 8.8 Watt |
| Load |
29.7 / 44 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Samsung PM991 MZALQ256HAJD | HP 17-ca1149ng Vega 8, R5 3500U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | -11% | -38% | -6% | -23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 3 29% | 4.4 -5% | 6 -43% | 5.6 -33% | 4.1 2% |
| Idle Average * | 7.9 | 7.2 9% | 10 -27% | 12.5 -58% | 6 24% | 7.8 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.8 | 7.7 12% | 11.7 -33% | 12.9 -47% | 7 20% | 10 -14% |
| Load Average * | 29.7 | 42 -41% | 41 -38% | 34.9 -18% | 47 -58% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 28.8 | 26.8 7% | 32.5 -13% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 44 | 44.1 -0% | 42 5% | 46 -5% | 52.1 -18% | 64.7 -47% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W: Ø28.8 (21.5-32.9)
Power Consumption With External Monitor
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø24.7 (23-34.2)
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø28 (24.2-38)
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø35.1 (26.8-44.6)
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø21.5 (15.8-37.2)
电池寿命
在平衡电源模式下150尼特亮度的WLAN测试中，32瓦时的小电池勉强维持了4个半小时。在满负荷的情况下，由于CPU在电池运行时被限制在10瓦，它可以持续1：40小时。
前者的持续时间要长一小时，大多数竞争对手的持续时间甚至是两倍。AMD版本有一个更大的47瓦时的电池，总体上应该提供明显更好的结果。
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 32 Wh | Asus VivoBook 17 F712FA-AU518T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 32 Wh | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 42 Wh | HP 17-ca1149ng R5 3500U, Vega 8, 41.7 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6 R3 5300U, Vega 6, 45 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, 50.2 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 24% | 41% | -11% | 68% | 51% | 69% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 262 | 324 24% | 369 41% | 294 12% | 628 140% | 441.4 68% | 625 ? 139% |
| Load | 100 | 67 -33% | 95 -5% | 133 33% | 97.8 ? -2% | ||
| Reader / Idle | 657 | 1205 | 827 | 1168 ? | |||
| H.264 | 385 | 292 | 821 ? | ||||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 77 | 76.3 ? |
Pros
+ 具有清晰子像素的哑光IPS显示屏
+ 可接受的扬声器
+ 良好的系统性能
+ 易于维护
+ 快速的WLAN
+ 轻巧的17英寸笔记本电脑
+ 安静
+ USB-C + 3x USB-A...
Cons
- ...但其中两个只有USB 2.0
- 看起来很便宜的机箱
- 薄弱的冷却系统和15W TDP锁
- 显示器颜色太暗
- 电池小，续航能力差
- 键盘的反馈很弱，标签很难读懂
- 没有DisplayPort、Power Delivery、完整的SD阅读器和以太网
结论。华硕VivoBook 17与强大的竞争对手
一方面，通过华硕VivoBook 17（F712JA），你可以得到一个真正安静和凉爽的工作设备，具有良好的系统性能，许多连接，良好的维护选项，可以接受的多媒体享受的扬声器，以及锐利和清晰的哑光FHD IPS显示屏。
此外，配备英特尔酷睿i3和HD+显示屏的最实惠配置已经从399欧元（约421美元）开始，而我们的测试装置的最高设备配置目前为729欧元（约769美元）。
另一方面，USB-C接口缺少Power Delivery和DisplayPort，而显示屏，亮度更高，色彩空间覆盖更好。 运行时间不到4:22小时的小电池也只适合那些几乎不在办公桌外使用设备的人，要使用键盘和阅读按键标签，你需要最好的光线条件。将机箱风扇通过热管直接连接到CPU上也是有好处的，这样可以获得更高的TDP。三个USB端口中的两个也只使用较慢的2.0标准。
华硕VivoBook 17以其哑光、锐利的显示屏、良好的系统性能和凉爽安静的办公环境而令人信服。妥协之处主要在于电池寿命和键盘。
然而，其性能和亮度足以满足室内简单的办公和多媒体任务。对于那些能够接受上述缺点--包括略显廉价的外壳--并且能够以良好的价格找到它的人来说，VivoBook应该是足够了。
对于所有其他用户，惠普17 提供更好的键盘和强大的Ryzen 7 5700U 与Vega图形（当前型号）。虽然Acer Aspire 5 提供照明键盘、以太网、金属外壳和更好的电池寿命，但我们竞争中的真正赢家是Lenovo IdeaPad 3 17：它带来了一个明亮的、对比度丰富的显示屏，带有触摸选项和FreeSync，一个非常好的键盘，出色的电池寿命，以及一个强大的Ryzen-CPU。AMD版本的699欧元（约合738美元）和英特尔版本的599欧元（约合632美元）的价格没有任何区别。
价格和可用性
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W
- 05/01/2022 v7 (old)
Marvin Gollor
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Price comparison
