Notebookcheck Logo

华硕 VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T 变形本简短评测

21小时。 时尚的铝合金外壳搭配360度转轴。这台售价650欧元(约4844人民币)的机型能否和更昂贵的竞争对手一较高下呢?它的待机续航达到了21小时,而上网浏览续航时间为何不足5个小时?
Convertible / 2-in-1 Windows Touchscreen Skylake
Asus  VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T (VivoBook Flip TP301 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i3-6100U 2 x 2.3 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 520, Core: 950 MHz, RAM: 798 MHz
Memory
8 GB 
, 单通道, DDR3L 1600 MHz SDRAM, 板载内存 4 GB , 内存槽最大支持 8 GB
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, 10点触控, BOE HB133WX1-402, TN, 可选 IPS 全高清 (1920x1080), glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP, 128 GB 
, SATA 2.5寸, 50 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 音频输出和麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD/​SDHC/​SDXC, Sensors: 陀螺仪
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 323 x 227
Battery
55 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3 芯, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 10 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 90万像素 640x480
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, SonicMaster Lite 技术, Keyboard: 孤岛式, 45瓦电源适配器, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.658 kg, Power Supply: 172 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

343.8 mm 230.4 mm 17.9 mm 1.5 kg324.8 mm 224.4 mm 20.4 mm 1.6 kg323 mm 227 mm 19.9 mm 1.7 kg325 mm 218 mm 16 mm 1.5 kg323 mm 220 mm 13.9 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Headphone/microphone, USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-C), 2x USB 3.0, HDMI, power-in
Headphone/microphone, USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-C), 2x USB 3.0, HDMI, power-in
USB 2.0, card reader, volume control, power button
USB 2.0, card reader, volume control, power button
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
 
31 MB/s
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
 
27.9 MB/s -10%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
 
20.4 MB/s -34%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
 
14.3 MB/s -54%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
 
38.7 MB/s
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
 
37.17 MB/s -4%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
 
25.2 MB/s -35%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
 
24.73 MB/s -36%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
439 MBit/s +89%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (Seb)
232 MBit/s
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Seb)
134 MBit/s -42%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (Seb)
457 MBit/s
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
323 MBit/s -29%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Seb)
281 MBit/s -39%
170
cd/m²
174
cd/m²
173
cd/m²
156
cd/m²
166
cd/m²
158
cd/m²
158
cd/m²
162
cd/m²
164
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE HB133WX1-402 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 174 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 164.6 cd/m² Minimum: 9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 166 cd/m²
Contrast: 377:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.99 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.02% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
BOE HB133WX1-402, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
AUO B133HAB, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Sharp LQ133T1JW02, , 2560x1440, 13.3"
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
LG Philips LGD0000, , 2560x1440, 13.3"
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
AUO B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display
-7%
63%
55%
53%
Display P3 Coverage
41.63
38.88
-7%
69.6
67%
66.8
60%
65.1
56%
sRGB Coverage
62.6
57.7
-8%
98
57%
92.8
48%
93
49%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
43.02
40.17
-7%
70.7
64%
67.3
56%
66.5
55%
Response Times
-130%
557%
-37%
55%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38 ?(19, 19)
44 ?(20, 24)
-16%
36 ?(12, 24)
5%
24 ?(11, 36)
37%
29 ?(15, 14)
24%
Response Time Black / White *
9 ?(4, 5)
31 ?(15, 16)
-244%
30 ?(8, 22)
-233%
19 ?(10, 28)
-111%
22 ?(5, 17)
-144%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(90)
1000 ?(10)
1900%
192 ?(30)
284%
Screen
21%
72%
49%
35%
Brightness middle
166
240
45%
320
93%
324
95%
302
82%
Brightness
165
229
39%
308
87%
324
96%
298
81%
Brightness Distribution
90
92
2%
91
1%
90
0%
90
0%
Black Level *
0.44
0.24
45%
0.17
61%
0.34
23%
0.21
52%
Contrast
377
1000
165%
1882
399%
953
153%
1438
281%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.07
4.75
-17%
3.18
22%
4.36
-7%
6.33
-56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.38
9.09
-42%
9.91
-55%
11.89
-86%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.99
4.3
-8%
4.13
-4%
4.62
-16%
8.13
-104%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.5 88%
2.03 108%
2.18 101%
2.52 87%
CCT
7491 87%
5893 110%
6752 96%
6857 95%
6811 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40
36.79
-8%
65
63%
60
50%
60
50%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
63
57.39
-9%
98
56%
93
48%
93
48%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-39% / -5%
231% / 161%
22% / 38%
48% / 42%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 50 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

System info: CPU-Z CPU
System info: CPU-Z Cache
System info: CPU-Z Mainboard
System info: CPU-Z Memory
System info: Latency Checker OK
System info: GPU-Z HD 520
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points +37%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel Core i5-6200U
113 Points +19%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel Core i7-6500U
104 Points +9%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Intel Core i3-6100U
95 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
85 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel Core i7-6500U
321 Points +32%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Intel Core i7-6500U
312 Points +28%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel Core i5-6200U
284 Points +16%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Intel Core i3-6100U
244 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
208 Points -15%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
30.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
244 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
95 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
3699 Points +25%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3161 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
2960 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
2727 Points -8%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
4577 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
4121 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3971 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
3496 Points -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2960 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4121 points
Help
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Lite-On CV1-8B256
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Lite-On CV1-8B128
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
610%
761%
389%
406%
Read Seq
396
479
21%
507
28%
491.8
24%

491.8
24%

497
26%
Write Seq
133.5
270.1
102%
354.4
165%
264.5
98%

264.5
98%

182.9
37%
Read 512
259.5
428.3
65%
355.3
37%
396.2
53%

396.2
53%

353
36%
Write 512
23.86
267.9
1023%
353.9
1383%
264.5
1009%

264.5
1009%

144.1
504%
Read 4k
5.783
23.77
311%
32.66
465%
30.88
434%

30.88
434%

31.89
451%
Write 4k
8.507
81.4
857%
81.6
859%
75.6
789%

75.6
789%

62
629%
Read 4k QD32
97.5
333.6
242%
277.6
185%
31.85
-67%

31.85
-67%

207.7
113%
Write 4k QD32
8.515
200.9
2259%
261.2
2968%
73.9
768%

73.9
768%

131.8
1448%
Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
Sequential Read: 396 MB/s
Sequential Write: 133.5 MB/s
512K Read: 259.5 MB/s
512K Write: 23.86 MB/s
4K Read: 5.783 MB/s
4K Write: 8.507 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 97.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 8.515 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1490 Points +41%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1415 Points +33%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1326 Points +25%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1326 Points +25%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
1060 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
714 Points -33%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
7945 Points +68%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
7843 Points +66%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7439 Points +57%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7439 Points +57%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
5510 Points +17%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
4724 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
911 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
853 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
853 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
1141 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3915 points
Help
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
17.3 fps +24%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
14 fps
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
8.4 fps -40%
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
32.2 fps +33%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
29.6 fps +22%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
27.3 fps +12%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
24.3 fps
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
20.2 fps -17%
Thief - 1024x768 Very Low Preset
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
24.3 fps +83%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
13.3 fps
lowmed.highultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 43 24.3 18.4
Thief (2014) 13.3 8.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 14 9

Noise Level

Idle
31.3 / 31.3 / 32.9 dB(A)
Load
35 / 34.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
 24.3 °C24.5 °C25.1 °C 
 24.2 °C25.7 °C25.4 °C 
 24.2 °C24.5 °C25 °C 
Maximum: 25.7 °C
Average: 24.8 °C
25.1 °C25.4 °C25.1 °C
25.9 °C26.6 °C25.5 °C
24.9 °C24.7 °C24.7 °C
Maximum: 26.6 °C
Average: 25.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.929.537.92537.933.637.93138.834.338.84032.830.632.85030.932.430.96333.228.933.28030.728.430.71003726.43712544.126.544.116046.424.546.420042.824.442.825048.823.148.831553.522.653.540054.421.254.450049.220.449.263052.519.652.580061.219.461.2100065.41965.4125066.118.566.1160069.318.269.3200071.918.671.9250069.818.569.831507218.672400073.318.873.3500074.218.874.2630068.418.868.4800065.918.965.91000064.918.864.91250059.218.759.21600046.918.646.9SPL81.831.281.8N47.21.647.2median 61.2median 18.9median 61.2Delta10.31.410.339.136.833.739.137.936.337.137.936.237.735.836.233.633.833.633.631.932.832.431.930.831.229.830.828.429.328.528.428.530.433.428.531.835.439.331.835.439.14235.441.14547.841.1505458.45054.359.263.254.358.263.467.858.258.163.667.358.160.665.870.260.669.374.277.669.364.169.67364.159.564.868.459.554.6606454.656.161.665.556.155.260.564.355.254.159.363.254.153.258.562.853.248.553.956.148.543.748.952.543.744.249.553.144.245.851.355.545.855.56165.255.552.357.762.152.371.676.780.371.623.732.741.323.7median 54.1median 59.2median 63.2median 54.17.17.17.37.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006TAcer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.26 / 0.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.95 / 5.6 / 7.7 Watt
Load midlight 22.6 / 23.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
6100U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP, TN, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
6500U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
6500U, HD Graphics 520, Lite-On CV1-8B256, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.3"
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.3"
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS with 72% NTSC, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Power Consumption
-22%
-67%
-25%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
2.95
4.4
-49%
6.2
-110%
3.9
-32%
3.4
-15%
Idle Average *
5.6
6.1
-9%
8
-43%
7.4
-32%
7
-25%
Idle Maximum *
7.7
6.8
12%
11.6
-51%
9.2
-19%
7.6
1%
Load Average *
22.6
29
-28%
40
-77%
28.1
-24%
19
16%
Load Maximum *
23.5
31.9
-36%
36.6
-56%
27.6
-17%
20.1
14%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
21h 00min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 13min
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
6100U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 54 Wh
Battery Runtime
-40%
-24%
72%
13%
Reader / Idle
1260
674
-47%
669
-47%
1027
-18%
WiFi v1.3
290
240
-17%
382
32%
500
72%
386
33%
Load
193
86
-55%
85
-56%
239
24%
H.264
393

Pros

+ 坚固,高品质的机身
+ 易于维护更新
+ 非常清凉安静
+ 低功耗

Cons

- 相对较短的电池续航
- 键盘反馈僵硬
- TN屏幕较暗
- 低于90%亮度屏幕采用50赫兹的闪烁亮度控制
- 缓慢的SATA固态硬盘
- HD 520整合显卡性能低
In review: Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T. Test model courtesy of Cyberport.de
In review: Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T. Test model courtesy of Cyberport.de

华硕再次为我们带来了一台优点众多的产品,但它同时也存在一些不小的问题。VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T在较低的售价上,应该可以成为一款有潜力的变形本。在650欧元(约4864人民币)的价位上,它搭配了铝合金机身,全高清分辨率,丰富的接口,不错的可维护性,高速固态硬盘和实用的电池续航时间。

不过,这台华硕设备的入门机型也有一些缺点,TN屏幕的可视角度窄不太适合作为平板使用。而略为僵硬的键盘和不太稳定的屏幕转轴也同样会影响使用感受。因为这些缺点,我们不太推荐这台测试机,不过它的高配机型十分值得考虑。升级之后,它搭配同样分辨率的IPS屏幕,可视角度更宽,以及GeForce 920M显卡和256 GB固态硬盘,售价999欧元(约7476人民币)起。更贵的高配机型可能也是搭配的较慢的SATA固态硬盘,不过容量更大。 

需要更丰富接口的用户可以考虑Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T,不过它也更笨重一些。Zenbook UX360CAAspire R13 R7-372TSpectre x360相比都有两个优势:M.2固态硬盘速度更快以及效果更好的IPS屏幕。Spectre x360 13-4104ng还提供了品质更高的机身,和Aspire R13 R7一样,它们的屏幕分辨率也更高。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T - 08/30/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis
87 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
71%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
46 / 80 → 57%
Weight
67 / 35-78 → 74%
Battery
80%
Display
74%
Games Performance
54 / 68 → 79%
Application Performance
76 / 87 → 87%
Temperature
96%
Noise
90%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
23 / 85 → 27%
Average
70%
78%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T 变形本简短评测
Sebastian Jentsch, 2016-09- 3 (Update: 2016-09-10)