Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar华硕 Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T 变形本简短评测
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T (Zenbook UX360CA Series)
Processor
Intel Core m3-6Y30 2 x 0.9 - 2.2 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 515, Core: 700 MHz, RAM: 930 MHz, DDR3
Memory
8 GB
, 双通道 LPDDR3 1866MHz SDRAM 半在内存, 最高 8 GB SDRAM
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, 镜面触控屏幕, AUO B133HAN02.7, IPS，覆盖 72% NTSC色域, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
Lite-On CV1-8B128, 128 GB
, serial ATA 6GB, 62 GB free
Weight
1.348 kg, Power Supply: 170 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUO B133HAN02.7 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 319 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 297.8 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 302 cd/m²
Contrast: 1438:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.13 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T 1920x1080 IPS | Toshiba Satellite Radius 12 P20W-C-106 3840x2160 IPS | HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng 2560x1440 IPS | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 2560x1440 IPS | Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK 3200x1800 IPS | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 2736x1824 IPS | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N 2160x1440 sAMOLED | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 1% | 6% | -3% | 2% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.1 | 63.6 -2% | 66.8 3% | 69.6 7% | 63.2 -3% | 65 0% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 93 | 94.7 2% | 92.8 0% | 98 5% | 88.7 -5% | 96.5 4% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.5 | 65 -2% | 67.3 1% | 70.7 6% | 64.9 -2% | 67 1% | |
| Response Times | -117% | 16% | 120% | 183% | -58% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29 ? | 68 ? -134% | 24 ? 17% | 36 ? -24% | 38.8 ? -34% | 46 ? -59% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 44 ? -100% | 19 ? 14% | 30 ? -36% | 22.4 ? -2% | 31.2 ? -42% | |
| PWM Frequency | 192 ? | 1000 ? 421% | 1316 585% | 50 ? -74% | |||
| Screen | 13% | -1% | 19% | -27% | 9% | 111% | |
| Brightness middle | 302 | 388 28% | 324 7% | 320 6% | 319.8 6% | 413 37% | 363 20% |
| Brightness | 298 | 351 18% | 324 9% | 308 3% | 302 1% | 396 33% | 378 27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 85 -6% | 90 0% | 91 1% | 88 -2% | 87 -3% | 90 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.32 -52% | 0.34 -62% | 0.17 19% | 0.835 -298% | 0.36 -71% | 0.03 86% |
| Contrast | 1438 | 1213 -16% | 953 -34% | 1882 31% | 383 -73% | 1147 -20% | 12100 741% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.33 | 1.83 71% | 4.36 31% | 3.18 50% | 2.68 58% | 3.09 51% | 4.8 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.89 | 9.91 17% | 6.91 42% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.13 | 2.17 73% | 4.62 43% | 4.13 49% | 2.35 71% | 3.92 52% | 5.04 38% |
| Gamma | 2.52 87% | 2.43 91% | 2.18 101% | 2.03 108% | 2.09 105% | 2.3 96% | 2.57 86% |
| CCT | 6811 95% | 6703 97% | 6857 95% | 6752 96% | 6975 93% | 7333 89% | 7255 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60 0% | 60 0% | 65 8% | 57 -5% | 61 2% | 73 22% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 95 2% | 93 0% | 98 5% | 88 -5% | 97 4% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -35% /
-8% | 5% /
2% | 48% /
36% | 51% /
19% | -16% /
-6% | 111% /
111% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 192 Hz | ≤ 30 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 192 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 192 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2727 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3496 points | |
Help | ||
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA Lite-On CV1- 8B128 | Toshiba Sat. Radius 12 P20W-C Samsung PM871 | HP Spectre x360 13 Samsung PM851 | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T Lite-On CV1- 8B256 | Lenovo Yoga 900- 13ISK Samsung PM871 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Samsung PM951 | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N Lite-On CV1- 8B128 | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Samsung PM871 | HP Spectre x2 12 Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271 N.N. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 44% | -11% | 44% | 42% | 28% | -8% | 26% | 6% | 18% | |
| Read Seq | 497 | 492.6 -1% | 491.8 -1% 491.8 -1% | 507 2% | 514 3% | 666 34% | 419.8 -16% | 497.9 0% | 410.1 -17% | 518 4% |
| Write Seq | 182.9 | 306.5 68% | 264.5 45% 264.5 45% | 354.4 94% | 459.5 151% | 154.2 -16% | 162.9 -11% | 153.5 -16% | 316 73% | 199.9 9% |
| Read 4k | 31.89 | 33.48 5% | 30.88 -3% 30.88 -3% | 32.66 2% | 36.34 14% | 28.51 -11% | 27.49 -14% | 36.2 14% | 27.4 -14% | 29.3 -8% |
| Write 4k | 62 | 89.7 45% | 75.6 22% 75.6 22% | 81.6 32% | 100.1 61% | 101.5 64% | 48.44 -22% | 95.5 54% | 53.5 -14% | 76.8 24% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 207.7 | 323.9 56% | 31.85 -85% 31.85 -85% | 277.6 34% | 313.8 51% | 368.3 77% | 236.2 14% | 389.5 88% | 196 -6% | 272 31% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 131.8 | 249 89% | 73.9 -44% 73.9 -44% | 261.2 98% | 96.8 -27% | 153.6 17% | 135 2% | 154 17% | 147.8 12% | 197.1 50% |
| AS SSD | 20% | 36% | 62% | 42% | -8% | 17% | -1% | 16% | ||
| Seq Read | 486.3 | 491.7 1% 491.7 1% | 514 6% | 505 4% | 832 71% | 473.3 -3% | 499.7 3% | 439.1 -10% | 505 4% | |
| Seq Write | 175.6 | 255.5 46% 255.5 46% | 342 95% | 454.6 159% | 142.5 -19% | 169.6 -3% | 147 -16% | 216.9 24% | 186.6 6% | |
| 4K Read | 28.29 | 23.7 -16% 23.7 -16% | 30.32 7% | 32.29 14% | 34.24 21% | 20.79 -27% | 32.41 15% | 23.12 -18% | 31.06 10% | |
| 4K Write | 57 | 63.4 11% 63.4 11% | 71.3 25% | 80.6 41% | 86.5 52% | 52.5 -8% | 80.7 42% | 49.2 -14% | 66 16% | |
| Score Read | 372 | 437 17% 437 17% | 345 -7% | 458 23% | 645 73% | 343 -8% | 459 23% | 333 -10% | 460 24% | |
| Score Write | 180 | 274 52% 274 52% | 371 106% | 429 138% | 239 33% | 176 -2% | 227 26% | 223 24% | 228 27% | |
| Score Total | 737 | 930 26% 930 26% | 896 22% | 1129 53% | 1190 61% | 686 -7% | 913 24% | 722 -2% | 918 25% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 44% /
44% | 5% /
5% | 40% /
40% | 52% /
53% | 35% /
35% | -8% /
-8% | 22% /
21% | 3% /
2% | 17% /
17% |
Lite-On CV1-8B128
Sequential Read:
497 MB/s
Sequential Write:
182.9 MB/s
512K Read:
353 MB/s
512K Write:
144.1 MB/s
4K Read:
31.89 MB/s
4K Write:
62 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
207.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
131.8 MB/s
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA | |
| Toshiba Sat. Radius 12 P20W-C | |
| HP Spectre x360 13 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13 | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900- 13ISK | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| HP Spectre x2 12 | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA | |
| Toshiba Sat. Radius 12 P20W-C | |
| HP Spectre x360 13 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13 | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900- 13ISK | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| HP Spectre x2 12 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 785 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4205 points | |
Help | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N | |
| Tomb Raider | |
| 1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| 1024x768 Low Preset (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA | |
| HP Spectre x360 13 | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 34.8 | 12.4 | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 36.4 | 20.2 | 15.8 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 8.4 | 4.2 |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128 | Toshiba Sat. Radius 12 P20W-C HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP Spectre x360 13 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256 | Lenovo Yoga 900- 13ISK HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | ||||||
| off / environment * | 31.3 | 31.3 | ||||
| Idle Minimum * | 32.5 | 29.6 | 31.3 | 29.7 | 31.5 | |
| Idle Average * | 32.6 | 29.6 | 31.3 | 29.8 | 31.5 | |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.6 | 34.6 | 31.8 | 30 | 31.5 | |
| Load Average * | 41 | 34.7 | 39.2 | 32 | 40.5 | |
| Load Maximum * | 41 | 37.9 | 39.1 | 38.5 | 40.7 |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA 6Y30 fanless | Toshiba Sat. Radius 12 P20W-C 6500U fan | HP Spectre x360 13 6200U fan | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T 6500U fan | Lenovo Yoga 900- 13ISK 6500U fan | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 6300U fan | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N 6Y30 fanless | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54 fanless | HP Spectre x2 12 6Y75 fanless | Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271 6200U fanless | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -14% | -5% | -0% | 1% | -44% | -30% | -9% | -16% | -20% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 46.5 -19% | 39.6 -2% | 40 -3% | 37.4 4% | 52.3 -34% | 42.5 -9% | 38.6 1% | 43.5 -12% | 46.7 -20% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 37.6 | 43 -14% | 39.7 -6% | 37.6 -0% | 36.4 3% | 51.4 -37% | 44.6 -19% | 40.8 -9% | 42 -12% | 51 -36% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.7 | 28.9 -12% | 25 3% | 25.1 2% | 26.6 -4% | 43.2 -68% | 36.6 -42% | 30.4 -18% | 33 -28% | 29.5 -15% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26 | 28.4 -9% | 29.8 -15% | 26 -0% | 25.6 2% | 36 -38% | 38.6 -48% | 28 -8% | 29.3 -13% | 28.6 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.3 °C / 0.6 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.3 °C / 0.6 F).
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA 6Y30 fanless | Toshiba Sat. Radius 12 P20W-C 6500U fan | HP Spectre x360 13 6200U fan | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T 6500U fan | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 6300U fan | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N 6Y30 fanless | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54 fanless | HP Spectre x2 12 6Y75 fanless | Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271 6200U fanless | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -103% | -25% | -68% | -20% | 5% | -28% | -11% | -54% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 8.8 -159% | 3.9 -15% | 6.2 -82% | 4.4 -29% | 3.4 -0% | 4 -18% | 4.5 -32% | 7.3 -115% |
| Idle Average * | 7 | 12.8 -83% | 7.4 -6% | 8 -14% | 9 -29% | 8 -14% | 8.6 -23% | 7.7 -10% | 10 -43% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.6 | 13.7 -80% | 9.2 -21% | 11.6 -53% | 10.7 -41% | 9 -18% | 9.3 -22% | 8.3 -9% | 10.15 -34% |
| Load Average * | 19 | 38 -100% | 28.1 -48% | 40 -111% | 19.6 -3% | 12 37% | 18.6 2% | 19.8 -4% | 25.2 -33% |
| Load Maximum * | 20.1 | 39 -94% | 27.6 -37% | 36.6 -82% | 19.9 1% | 16.1 20% | 36.3 -81% | 20.6 -2% | 29.3 -46% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.27 / 0.34 Watt |
| Idle |  3.4 / 7 / 7.6 Watt |
| Load |
19 / 20.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA 6Y30 fanless | Toshiba Sat. Radius 12 P20W-C 6500U fan | HP Spectre x360 13 6200U fan | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T 6500U fan | Lenovo Yoga 900- 13ISK 6500U fan | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 6300U fan | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N 6Y30 fanless | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54 fanless | HP Spectre x2 12 6Y75 fanless | Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271 6200U fanless | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -38% | 30% | -33% | -20% | -18% | 22% | -12% | -15% | -36% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1027 | 669 -35% | 844 -18% | 899 -12% | 1110 8% | 861 -16% | 954 -7% | 640 -38% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 386 | 241 -38% | 500 30% | 382 -1% | 403 4% | 427 11% | 525 36% | 440 14% | 361 -6% | 321 -17% |
| Load | 239 | 85 -64% | 128 -46% | 111 -54% | 157 -34% | 166 -31% | 112 -53% | |||
| H.264 | 393 | 515 | 450 | 468 |
Pros
+ 轻盈，高品质的机身
+ 非常优秀的触控板
+ 明亮，高对比度屏幕
+ 维护升级较难但仍然可能
+ 无噪音
+ 支持A型和C型USB接口
+ 全尺寸SD卡读卡器
Cons
- 键盘品质较差
- 屏幕转轴不稳定
你正在寻找一款多功能的轻盈变形本，又希望它能够有美观的设计？华硕在尝试重新设计Zenbook UX305CA（酷睿m，无风扇）时在这两者间寻找一个平衡，借鉴了Yoga的设计风格。它将会成为联想Yoga 900-13ISK (1400欧元, 约10177人民币)的竞争对手。当然，这台华硕设备的价位更实惠（830欧元，约6033人民币），但是它没有搭配4K屏幕，也只采用了酷睿 m3，没有吸引眼球的表带式转轴。
“只搭配了酷睿m3”真的是一个缺点吗？我们认为不是。华硕和我们的观点相同，在我们的测试中，在酷睿m3、m5和m7之间，m3提供了最高的性价比。搭配酷睿m7的设备如惠普 Spectre x2 12由于过热降频而无法发挥完全的性能。这就像是买一台会被限速80千里／时的摩托车一样。选择一台节能的轻型机车将会是更好的选择。它也会在拥挤的城市中更加游刃有余，就像我们的系统测试结果显示的一样。归功于高速固态硬盘，酷睿i和酷睿m额实际性能表现差距也很小，12-15%的差距一般很难感觉到。
微软没有为无风扇的Surface Pro 4提供酷睿m5和m7的选项。需要更强性能的用户则需要选择酷睿i处理器。而华硕也没有在这台360度旋转机型提供其他选项，但传统设计的Zenbook则可以升级处理器。售价略高的选择还有Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N（搭配Thunderbolt 3接口）和东芝 Satellite Radius 12 P20W-C-106。
相比平板电脑，UX360CA提供了更多的接口。根据需要不同，这可能并不一定是个优势。联想 IdeaPad Miix 700提供了一个全尺寸的A型USB接口和一个micro-HDMI，而惠普 Spectre x2 12则搭配了两个USB-C接口，但是没有独立视频输出接口。
华硕的Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T是一台设计优秀的变形本，弱点只有不太稳定的键盘。需要长时间打字的用户可能对它不会非常满意。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
- 06/15/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch
Convertible - Weighted Average
Price comparison
