华硕Vivobook 13 Slate平板电脑的回顾。OLED的最佳表现
一站式生产力和娱乐是华硕对其Vivobook 13 Slate OLED的描述。工作和消费内容应该是可以通过这台13英寸的笔记本实现的。为了实现这一目标,它配备了奔腾银处理器和色彩丰富、高对比度的全高清OLED显示屏,包括一支手写笔2.0。
被动冷却的四核CPU能跟上这个说法吗?考虑到华硕的所有大话,Vivobook 13 Slate至少应该能够跟上微软Surface Go 2和 三星Galaxy Book S.这两个竞争对手更加昂贵,而且没有配备OLED显示屏,但他们设定了性能标准,一个有生产力雄心的可拆卸设备至少应该达到这个标准。一台奔腾N6000能否跟上 m3-8100Y或 酷睿i5-L16G7?
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Asus Vivobook 13 Slate Pentium N6000, UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | 1.4 kg | 7.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85.4 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615 | 790 g | 8.3 mm | 10.50" | 1920x1280 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2020 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | 1.1 kg | 8.5 mm | 12.30" | 2736x1824 | |
84.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2019 | Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1, Adreno 685 | 1 kg | 7.3 mm | 13.00" | 2880x1920 | |
85.1 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2020 | Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel i5-L16G7, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | 940 g | 11.8 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 可拆卸的脚架
这款平板电脑由一个铝制框架组成,显示屏和硬件从正面插入其中。该设备具有良好的抗扭转能力,但也不是非常坚固。为维护目的打开它是不可能的,至少对普通用户来说是这样。反正没有可更换的部件,因为内存、Wi-Fi模块和存储驱动器都是板载的。
键盘套用磁力吸附在平板电脑上;它能自己吸附,所以你不必寻找正确的方法来使其适合。另一方面,支架固定在背面的一个精确定义的位置,即上层场集成了左右两块强磁铁的地方。它们将平板电脑牢牢地固定住,甚至可以被支架举起。支架有一个沉重的连续铰链,决定了平板电脑的放置角度。这使得平板电脑可以在110至170度的范围内直立起来。在腿上使用是可能的,只要你设法给支架一个安全的支撑。这一点被左侧的切口所阻碍。
可拆卸的重达1.4公斤,相比之下,这是个不小的数字,没有哪个竞争对手有这么重。每个部件都对重量有贡献,但可拆卸支架(334克)是最重的。最后但并非最不重要的是,冷却系统和用于连接支架的磁铁以及50Wh电池导致平板电脑本身的重量达到789克。图表中的数字总是指带键盘的总重量。12.5英寸到13英寸的竞争产品的重量没有这么大。Surface Pro X和Galaxy Book S重量约为一公斤。
连接性 - 可拆卸的快速Wi-Fi
当涉及到端口时,生产力就会停滞不前。华硕的设备缺乏Thunderbolt连接。有两个Type-C端口,都有DisplayPort。其中一个可能总是被充电器挡住,例如在家里。这意味着,实际上只能连接一个显示器。
SD卡阅读器
我们使用我们的参考SD卡(AV Pro V60)来测试内置读卡器的速度。在复制大数据块时,最大传输速度为39MB/s,而对于标准的jpg图像文件(每个约5MB),可以预期41MB/s。在这里,竞争对手的速度有时是其两倍。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate |
沟通
Wi-Fi 6搭载了英特尔AX201。该芯片在这里处于最佳状态,因为它的性能高于这种类型设备的平均水平。集成在电源按钮上的指纹识别器不是很明显,但它就在那里。你只需将手指放在上面。由于缺乏红外摄像头,华硕平板电脑没有提供带有面部识别功能的Windows Hello。
网络摄像头
辅料
华硕在包装盒中包括一支主动式手写笔,一条充电线,一个用于笔的磁性支架,以及一个用于整个平板电脑的大型便携箱。此外,还包括一个套筒键盘和一个65瓦的电源适配器。遗憾的是,手写笔的充电线有一个Type-A接口,所以它不能和平板电脑一起充电,而是需要一个单独的充电器或一台笔记本电脑。这支笔的磁力支架可以粘在支架上,也可以粘在平板电脑上(仅右侧)。
维护
未经训练的用户无法打开平板电脑。由于没有风扇,反正也不需要清洁什么。
担保
Vivobook 13 Slate OLED(T3300)还没有在商店出售。华硕通常为其所有产品提供两年的提货和退货保证,可以通过升级保证来延长。
输入设备--你在生产力平板电脑中需要的一切
在使用触摸屏时,固定的支架得到了回报。即使手指大力敲击屏幕,平板电脑也不会晃动或打滑。
面板也可以用手写笔来操作。我们的评测样品配备了一支带有可拆卸笔尖(2H、H、HB、B)的蓝牙笔,更确切地说,是一支Active Stylus SA203H(4,096个压力级别,266Hz采样率)。华硕将出售带有和不带手写笔的设备。
键盘
琴键的特点是坚固,几乎是僵硬的冲程,而且琴键之间的间距很大。键盘完全是平的,有点滑,而且键程很短(1.4毫米)。因此,打字很迅速,但有点笨拙。没有键盘背光灯。
触摸板
巨大的ClickPad宽度超过了许多15英寸或16英寸设备的尺寸。它有13厘米宽,6.7厘米高。表面从光滑到湿滑不等,而且点击的声音相当低沉和安静。与按键一样,弱点是行程短,上半部分更短。作为回报,压力点很清晰,能提供适度的反馈。
显示屏 - 色彩出色,就像在智能手机上一样
三星的13.3英寸FHD面板反应灵敏,亮度适中,覆盖P3色彩空间,并支持HDR真黑500。除了亮度,我们的测量结果证实了制造商的规格。我们只测量了302cd/m²的平均亮度,而华硕表示550尼特。测量的对比度为3000:1。由于采用了OLED面板,屏幕出血并不是一个问题。
作为OLED的典型,响应时间很好。在这个OLED面板中,在50%及以下的水平,PWM(60赫兹)被用于降低亮度,这时PWM(60赫兹)开始发挥作用。在此之前,直流调光是活跃的,我们也发现在90%到50%的亮度下,直流调光是60赫兹。由于直流调光在低亮度下会产生模糊的图像,它在50%时被关闭--然后在状态托盘中弹出以下警告。"从现在开始,如果没有直流调光,你的眼睛可能会变得紧张,休息一下吧。"
夜间工作者可能会受此影响;在特殊情况下,低于50%的亮度可能是可取的。在白天,我们在60%-70%的亮度下工作,所以我们没有面临没有直流调光的工作的不便。
一个OLED面板需要一定的照顾,这是第一次拥有者需要学习的课题。静态图像,如Windows桌面,可能会被烧毁,这是对显示器不可修复的损害。这就是Pixel Refresh和Pixel Shift存在的原因。前者是一个移动的屏幕保护程序,在没有活动的30分钟后启动。
Pixel Shift一直在运行,它不断地将图像内容从右到左移动一个像素,你可以想象成TFT的细微晃动。因此,即使图像是相同的,每个像素也会改变模式。
Pixel Refresh和Pixel Shift都可以在MyAsus/OLED Care中停用,风险自负。例如,我们在进行电池测试时就是这样做的。
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 303 cd/m²
Contrast: 3030:1 (Black: 0.1 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.84
ΔE Greyscale 4.33 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate Samsung SDC4169 ATNA33XC21, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel BOE07E7, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y NV105WAM-N31, IPS, 1920x1280, 10.5" | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 LG Philips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro X LP129WT112684, IPS, 2880x1920, 13" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | 5% | -0% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 65 | 70 8% | 68.7 6% | 66 2% | |
sRGB Coverage | 97 | 97.2 0% | 100 3% | 93.8 -3% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67 | 71.3 6% | 70.1 5% | 66.9 0% | |
Response Times | -1940% | -432% | 10986% | -1188% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 51.2 ? -2460% | 37.2 ? -1760% | 34.8 ? -1640% | 49.6 ? -2380% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2 ? | 30.4 ? -1420% | 22.8 ? -1040% | 26.4 ? -1220% | 30.4 ? -1420% |
PWM Frequency | 60 ? | 962 ? 1503% | 21550 ? 35817% | 201.6 ? 236% | |
Screen | -26% | 15% | -48% | -22% | |
Brightness middle | 303 | 385 27% | 404 33% | 480.4 59% | 466 54% |
Brightness | 303 | 354 17% | 402 33% | 485 60% | 470 55% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 88 -6% | 88 -6% | 91 -3% | 92 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.1 | 0.3 -200% | 0.28 -180% | 0.48 -380% | 0.44 -340% |
Contrast | 3030 | 1283 -58% | 1443 -52% | 1001 -67% | 1059 -65% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.29 | 3.8 11% | 0.7 84% | 5 -17% | 2.1 51% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.63 | 6.4 3% | 1.2 82% | 7.72 -16% | 4 40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.84 | 2.2 -20% | 0.7 62% | 2.44 -33% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.33 | 4.6 -6% | 1 77% | 5.9 -36% | 2.8 35% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.2 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.38 92% | 2.05 107% |
CCT | 6004 108% | 7424 88% | 6485 100% | 7805 83% | 6589 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.3 | 64.5 | 60.3 | 72.1 | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.2 | 99.7 | 93.2 | 96.8 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -654% /
-293% | -137% /
-77% | 3646% /
2168% | -605% /
-340% |
* ... smaller is better
我们发现在校准前,灰度和颜色的DeltaE分别为4.33和4.29--可以接受,但并不完美。校准后,这些数值分别提高到1.83和1.84。这使它们低于3.0,这是一个非常好的精确度。注意:我们必须停用HDR并卸载MyAsus,包括AsusSplendid,以使我们创建的色彩配置文件变得活跃。它之前被华硕的色温工具Splendid阻止使用。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在户外,光泽(非触摸)表面受到反射的影响,而适度的亮度无法弥补。该面板可以在有限的范围内用于阴暗区域。
OLED面板的可视角度是目前最好的。即使从平坦的角度看,颜色仍然稳定,亮度也不会失去强度。
性能 - 内容创作只能在有限的范围内进行
的英特尔奔腾银N6000是基于Jasper Lake架构的,该架构于2021年初推出,主要针对节能的低端设备。一些芯片可以被动地冷却,比如我们的Vivobook 13 Slate。到目前为止,被动系统已经使用了酷睿m芯片,如 m3-8100Y在微软Surface Go 2,或非常特殊的Ice Lake 芯片,如i5-L16G7有七瓦(三星Galaxy Book S).奔腾银的TDP为6瓦,甚至更加节俭。
四个核心的标准时钟频率为1.1GHz,但在单核使用时可提高到3.3GHz。这也发生在实践中;一个R15单核基准在3.2GHz下进行,随着时间的推移,3.1GHz被保持。
为了不忽视英特尔奔腾银N6000在其他设备中提供的性能,我们把Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1子笔记本。它是数据库中唯一采用这种奔腾CPU的设备。
测试条件
我们使用Windows配置文件 "高性能 "运行所有基准测试。这并没有什么区别,因为在 "平衡 "模式下,Cinebench R15和PCMark取得了相当的分数,如果不是更好的话。在 "电源效率 "下,R15的结果具有可比性,但PCMark 10取得的分数明显更高。考虑到这一点,我们使用每种情况下的最佳分数进行评级。
处理器
在性能方面,审查样本几乎与微软Surface Go 2(m3-8100Y)。Vivobook设法从奔腾银中提取更多的性能,比14英寸的Acer Swift 1 SF114-34拥有相同的、被动冷却的SoC。微软Surface Pro 7中的风冷酷睿处理器的性能也很好。微软Surface Pro 7运行速度几乎是其两倍--但它们在连续负载下也下降到27%。Vivobook中的奔腾更稳定,只有-5%。奔腾几乎没有短期负载的空间。所有被动冷却的竞争对手都是这种情况。
我们还看了FurMark中的英特尔UHD GraphicsiGPU。时钟率并不可读。在GPU压力测试中,GT核心消耗了4.5瓦特。在游戏中,这是在3至3.5瓦之间。
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 -6! | |
Microsoft Surface Pro X -12! | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y -2! | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel -2! | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18070, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (1610 - 1911, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Convertible (308 - 1970, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (653 - 679, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (595 - 730, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 755, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (237 - 268, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (266 - 322, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (109 - 121, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (1738 - 3157, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Average of class Convertible (193 - 1059, n=56, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (8096 - 9668, n=5) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (2320 - 3387, n=5) | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro X | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (1784 - 2004, n=5) | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 1981, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Pro X | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (720 - 736, n=5) | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 20.1, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (1.55 - 1.76, n=5) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (84.5 - 128, n=5) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=56, last 2 years) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (1.084 - 1.278, n=5) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=56, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Convertible (468 - 25226, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (940 - 1085, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Convertible (2644 - 106512, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (5420 - 6418, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Convertible (182 - 4764, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (397 - 467, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (19506 - 24270, n=4) | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Convertible (659 - 14835, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (934 - 1090, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Convertible (1420 - 56839, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (2811 - 3343, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (14460 - 16999, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1088, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (140 - 166, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Convertible (254 - 13175, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (523 - 603, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average of class Convertible (5136 - 52599, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (6647 - 10571, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
系统性能
PCMark分数的应用性能当然不表明有突出的表现,而是足够的表现。这肯定也与SSD的选择有关;它是一个PCIe Gen 3.0 x4,而不是一个焊接的闪存单元。尽管华硕设备不得不承认败给了 Surface Pro 7但它可以跟上甚至超过了 Surface Go 2.值得注意的是。三星的Galaxy Book S在这些测试中远远落后,这在上面的CPU基准测试中已经有所暗示。
关于内容创建者。Vivobook在内容创作方面的得分高于平均水平。尽管如此, Surface Pro 7在这一领域要好50%。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000, Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (2467 - 2823, n=3) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000, Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (5705 - 6729, n=3) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000, Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (3706 - 3955, n=3) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000, Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (1912 - 2295, n=3) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
PCMark 10 Score | 2823 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Convertible (16353 - 95631, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (15623 - 26405, n=4) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (15719 - 17883, n=4) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Convertible (10177 - 93451, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (17170 - 34661, n=4) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (57.8 - 71.4, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试中(网页浏览、4K YouTube播放、CPU负载),Vivobook出现了延迟升高的问题。这是由于DirectX、网络和ACPI驱动造成的。因此,这种驱动配置并不适合实时音频应用。在4K视频播放中,有95个跳帧(掉帧)。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate |
* ... smaller is better
储存
WDC PCIe 3.0 SSD(NVMe M.2)的总容量为256GB。它安装在标准模型中,据华硕称,它不是板载的,这意味着理论上它可以被替换。入门级版本有一个128GB的eMMC驱动器。
WDC SN530在驱动器基准中的排名相当低,通常在子分数上被两款Surface机型中的东芝固态硬盘所超越。虽然访问时间读取非常好,但在读取和写入大块和小块数据时,WDC就比较差了。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
英特尔UHD Graphics iGPU(32个EUs,350-850 MHz)协助快速同步(视频渲染)和高分辨率视频的播放。除了来自Windows商店的游戏外,没有什么可写的。最近甚至更早的大片,我们测试了其中一些,很可能会失误,正如非常红的游戏表所显示的那样。平滑的游戏通常甚至不可能使用最低设置。
3DMark 11 Performance | 1963 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1245 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 432 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
我们用《Witcher 3 》测试了被动冷却的平板电脑如何应对SoC上的持续负载。芯片加热到68℃(约154°F)和70℃(约158°F)之间,处理器部分运行在450或600MHz(1,100MHz是正常的时钟速度)。这意味着大规模的节流正在发生。GPU时钟速率无法读取,但我们也可以根据GT核心的功耗(分别为2.5瓦和3.5瓦)来确定性能的降低。作为一个专门的GPU压力测试,FurMark以4.5瓦的功率运行。
GTA V - 1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Average of class Convertible (57.7 - 179.3, n=46, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (6.57 - 26.8, n=6) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
Far Cry 5 - 1280x720 Low Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Convertible (15 - 135, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) () |
New World - 1280x720 Low Video Quality | |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) () |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 26 | 12 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 20.1 | 10 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 50.1 | 26.9 | 14.9 | 13.8 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 20 | 12.4 | 12.5 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | ||||
New World (2021) | 17 |
排放--华硕无风扇平板电脑
噪声排放
没有噪音排放,因为该平板电脑没有风扇。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26.3 / 26.3 / 26.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 26.3 / 26.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26.3 dB(A) |
温度
测试设备在温度方面表现正常。它在闲置时最高达到33℃(约91°F),而平均只有30℃(约86°F)。在负载情况下,它的触感会变热。平均36°C(约97°F),在某些时候41°C(约106°F)。这意味着Vivobook可以一直放在手中或腿上使用。带风扇的更强大的对手在负载下甚至更热,而在空闲使用时则与之持平--在Surface Pro 7Surface Pro 7的风扇只有在负载下才会打开。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-8.8 °C / -15.8 F).
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate Intel Pentium Silver N6000, Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel Intel Core i5-L16G7, Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | Microsoft Surface Pro X Microsoft SQ1, Qualcomm Adreno 685 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 16% | 10% | -4% | 8% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.4 | 38.1 8% | 45.4 -10% | 43.6 -5% | 41.8 -1% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40.8 | 40 2% | 42.6 -4% | 47.8 -17% | 45.7 -12% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32.9 | 24.8 25% | 24.9 24% | 32 3% | 26.3 20% |
Idle Bottom * | 34.1 | 24.8 27% | 23.8 30% | 32.4 5% | 25.8 24% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
SoC在长时间的负载下有什么反应?Prime95和FurMark由CPU和iGPU同时处理,这导致时钟速度很快下降到1.0和1.2GHz之间。这个速度是持续的,而废热则稳定在70℃(约158°F)。相当了不起的是,这种热量发展在表面上只转化为41℃(约106°F)。
发言人
华硕谈到了一个带有智能放大器的四扬声器系统。这应该是为了提供更高的音量,减少失真和环绕声。正如华硕所说的 "爆炸性的声音体验"?
好吧,与其他相同尺寸的平板电脑所提供的相比,以及与标准笔记本电脑所提供的相比,四扬声器系统是相当令人印象深刻的。它很响亮,在最大音量下不失真,中音和高音似乎很平衡。低音不存在,但讲话听起来很清晰,很突出。我们用音乐和语音测试了扬声器的人工智能降噪功能,没有发现任何影响,甚至用连接到组合端口的耳机也没有。
麦克风的降噪功能(MyAsus:AI降噪)工作得很完美。语音录制很干净,无论我们是在设备前、两米外,还是看着窗外说话。这是一个非常好的视频会议解决方案。
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--以耗电为代价的OLED便利性
能源消耗
正如预期的那样,该系统的功耗很低,这是由7瓦的奔腾保证的。然而,OLED显示屏通常会增加消耗率,我们在与竞争对手的比较中也观察到这一点。该Galaxy Book S在空闲状态下,2.5到6瓦就可以满足,而我们的Vivobook则需要4.2到8.2瓦。当OLED屏幕保护程序处于激活状态时,该快照的功耗增加了15%。最后,由于显示屏的原因,Vivobook并不像其他硬件那样节俭。在负载下,我们看到有限的性能能力反映在功耗上。平均和最大能量水平接近,这也是压力测试中显著节流的地方。风冷的竞争者的形式是Surface Pro 7在这里自然超过了Vivobook,因为英特尔酷睿要强大得多,这或多或少是对高能耗的补偿。奔腾银系列内部的一个有趣的比较是通过我们的TheWitcher 3测试和压力测试中的能耗来说明的。当我们的13英寸可拆卸式电脑以恒定的速度消耗能量并因此提供恒定的性能时,宏碁Swift达到了一个惊人的峰值,但随后又恢复到一个较低的水平。这证实了我们在上面看到的处理器的情况。我们的Vivobook在连续负载下比Aspire笔记本电脑有更多的计算能力。
Off / Standby | 0.6 / 0.7 Watt |
Idle | 4.2 / 6.1 / 8.2 Watt |
Load |
16.4 / 17.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate Pentium N6000, UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel i5-L16G7, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1, Adreno 685, 256 GB NVMe, IPS, 2880x1920, 13" | Average Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 17% | -98% | -19% | -15% | -108% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 2.5 40% | 4.5 -7% | 3.2 24% | 4.83 ? -15% | 5.25 ? -25% |
Idle Average * | 6.1 | 4.8 21% | 9.2 -51% | 8.5 -39% | 7.13 ? -17% | 8.19 ? -34% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.2 | 6 27% | 9.6 -17% | 9.6 -17% | 7.88 ? 4% | 11 ? -34% |
Load Average * | 16.4 | 14.9 9% | 42 -156% | 19.8 -21% | 17.5 ? -7% | 44.9 ? -174% |
Load Maximum * | 17.7 | 20.1 -14% | 63.5 -259% | 24.7 -40% | 24.9 ? -41% | 65.7 ? -271% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test
电池寿命
3芯锂离子电池是测试领域中最大的型号,有50Wh。然而,Wi-Fi运行时间为7:30小时,大大落后于 Surface Pro 7和Galaxy Book S.OLED更高的能耗在此可见一斑。
低性能也反映在高负载运行时间上。我们在禁用OLED护理的情况下,以最大亮度运行Battery Eater Classic。负载下的4:54小时是不寻常的,但它没有什么用,因为由于计算能力较低,任务也需要更长的时间。
最长的时间是15小时;这是在最低亮度下,没有OLED Care,没有无线模块,当然还有闲置模式(Battery Eater Reader)。的Surface Pro 7持续了令人印象深刻的22小时--只用了45Wh的电池。
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate Pentium N6000, UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), 50 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel i5-L16G7, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), 42 Wh | Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615, 27 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 45 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1, Adreno 685, 38.2 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 5% | -36% | 6% | 4% | 4% | |
Reader / Idle | 909 | 1336 47% | 1304 ? 43% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 452 | 591 31% | 407 -10% | 597 32% | 469 4% | 587 ? 30% |
Load | 294 | 233 -21% | 115 -61% | 116 -61% | 115.6 ? -61% | |
H.264 | 718 | 542 | 776 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 大众的OLED平板电脑
只有一半的速度 速率的一半,但有一个更好的显示屏。在价格-性能-显示方面,看一下竞争对手的情况就能清楚地说明Vivobook Slate的优势。这里安装了一个OLED显示屏,这在800欧元(约合904美元)以下的价格范围内直到现在还没有出现过。笔记本的IPS面板 Galaxy Book S, Surface Pro 7, 和笔记本Surface Go 2相比之下,它们显得过时了。当然不是在亮度方面,但OLED面板在所有其他方面显然更有优势。
在性能方面,我们的审查样本几乎与 微软Surface Go 2(m3-8100Y)。Vivobook设法从奔腾银中提取更多的性能,而不是14英寸宏碁Swift 1 SF114-34,后者有一个相同的、被动冷却的SoC。微软Surface Pro 7中的风冷酷睿处理器的性能也是如此。 微软Surface Pro 7的速度几乎是它的两倍--但它们在连续负荷下也会下降到27%。Vivobook中的奔腾要稳定得多,只有-5%。奔腾几乎没有短期负载的空间。然而,所有被动冷却的竞争对手都是这种情况。
大量的显示,大量的娱乐,以及适度的性能。Vivobook 13 Slate以低廉的价格击中了目标。华硕将OLED带入Windows平板电脑的主流。
有点创造性的工作是可能的,但Vivobook 13 Slate主要是为消费者提供的设备。用非常好的平板电脑声音欣赏YouTube短片和Netflix,用最好的麦克风质量参加会议,用一个体面的16MP摄像头拍摄花园里的宠物。
除了固有的高能耗--导致运行时间比预期的短--OLED技术也带来了对眼睛的不利影响。直流调光在50%及以下的亮度时就会关闭,之后面板会以60赫兹的速度显示PWM闪烁。虽然这种低亮度不是典型的情况,但在这个亮度范围内工作的人将不得不应对眼睛疲劳--即使他们在其他情况下对闪烁不那么敏感,因为60赫兹的频率非常低。作为比较。笔记本电脑的TFT经常表现出250至2500赫兹的频率。
你几乎要用放大镜才能发现其他缺点。这里可以提到相机质量一般,重量大,读卡器慢。
价格和可用性
华硕Vivobook 13 Slate OLED(T3300)将于12月上市,起价599美元。Surface Go 2如果加上Surface Go Type Cover的价格,它甚至比廉价的Surface Go 2低约130美元。较弱的是三星Galaxy Book S也仍然要929美元。在这种情况下,Vivobook 13 Slate的优点超过了它的缺点。
Asus Vivobook 13 Slate
-
11/25/2021 v7 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch