Notebookcheck Logo

Wiko U Feel Prime 智能手机简短评测

便宜,值。 Wiko带来了一台全高清双卡并带有指纹识别功能的5英寸智能手机,并且价格不到300欧元(约合316美元)。我们的测试报告将会告诉你这台设备仅是廉价或亦富有竞争力。
Touchscreen Smartphone ARM Android
Wiko U Feel Prime (U Feel Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memory
4 GB 
Display
5.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 441 PPI, 五点触控电容屏, IPS, 2.5D-glass, 全贴合, CABC, 1600W色, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm 耳机接口, Card Reader: 最大69G micro-SD 储存卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计, 陀螺仪, 距离传感器, 罗盘
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B20); bandwidth (download/​upload): 150Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE); SAR-rate: 0.99W/​kg (head), 0.80W/​kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 142.5 x 69.9
Battery
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 28 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 21 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 450 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 双LED闪光灯, HDR, 录像@1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 自拍闪光灯, 录像@720p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: 底边单扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 耳机, USB 线缆, 充电器r, SIM 工具, SIM 转换插座, News Republic, phone assistent, Zenly, One Clean, 24 Months Warranty, USB-OTG, FM 收音机, fanless
Weight
150 g, Power Supply: 48 g
Price
0 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

145.8 mm 72.3 mm 8.1 mm 159 g145.5 mm 71 mm 7.45 mm 153 g143 mm 70.7 mm 8.55 mm 145 g143.6 mm 66.8 mm 7.9 mm 137 g142.5 mm 69.9 mm 8.7 mm 150 g141 mm 68.88 mm 8.45 mm 149 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ZUK Z2
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
318 MBit/s +498%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash
104 MBit/s +95%
Wiko U Feel Prime
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.2 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ZUK Z2
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
296 MBit/s +434%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s +82%
Wiko U Feel Prime
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 MBit/s
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Wiko U Feel Prime – overview
GPS Wiko U Feel Prime – overview
GPS Wiko U Feel Prime – crossing
GPS Wiko U Feel Prime – crossing
GPS Wiko U Feel Prime – bridge
GPS Wiko U Feel Prime – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
354
cd/m²
410
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
411
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 411 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 385.6 cd/m² Minimum: 17.81 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 411 cd/m²
Contrast: 1142:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.53
Wiko U Feel Prime
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Lenovo ZUK Z2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2"
Wiko U Feel
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Screen
-38%
-7%
-21%
-9%
-4%
Brightness middle
411
518
26%
512
25%
451
10%
289
-30%
500
22%
Brightness
386
475
23%
502
30%
443
15%
291
-25%
485
26%
Brightness Distribution
86
81
-6%
84
-2%
93
8%
96
12%
83
-3%
Black Level *
0.36
0.61
-69%
0.58
-61%
0.4
-11%
0.22
39%
Contrast
1142
849
-26%
883
-23%
1128
-1%
2273
99%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.3
6.8
-58%
3.8
12%
5.4
-26%
4.7
-9%
6.3
-47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.9
11.4
-44%
11.2
-42%
9.9
-25%
7.3
8%
14.4
-82%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
7
-150%
2.7
4%
6.7
-139%
3
-7%
5.2
-86%
Gamma
2.53 87%
2.35 94%
2.09 105%
2.33 94%
2.03 108%
2.17 101%
CCT
6589 99%
8151 80%
6076 107%
8262 79%
6291 103%
7536 86%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2273 Hz ≤ 1 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2273 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2273 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
44420 Points
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points +9%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
122513 Points +176%
Honor 8
94671 Points +113%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points -39%
Wiko U Feel
28175 Points -37%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
644 Points
Honor 8
1726 Points +168%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
2085 Points
Honor 8
5481 Points +163%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
9548 Points
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points +17%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29241 Points +206%
Honor 8
20235 Points +112%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points -54%
Wiko U Feel
4969 Points -48%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points
Lenovo ZUK Z2
32997 Points
Honor 8
22157 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points
Wiko U Feel
4355 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points
Lenovo ZUK Z2
20910 Points
Honor 8
15531 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points
Wiko U Feel
9801 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
584 Points
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points +3%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3302 Points +465%
Honor 8
1273 Points +118%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points -91%
Wiko U Feel
202 Points -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
514 Points
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points +2%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
4506 Points +777%
Honor 8
1112 Points +116%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points -92%
Wiko U Feel
166 Points -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
1118 Points
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points +13%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1706 Points +53%
Honor 8
2587 Points +131%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points -37%
Wiko U Feel
860 Points -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
301 Points
Sony Xperia XA
422 Points +40%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2419 Points +704%
Honor 8
961 Points +219%
Wiko U Feel
126 Points -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
250 Points
Sony Xperia XA
306 Points +22%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2792 Points +1017%
Honor 8
818 Points +227%
Wiko U Feel
101 Points -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
1034 Points
Sony Xperia XA
1236 Points +20%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1648 Points +59%
Honor 8
2482 Points +140%
Wiko U Feel
853 Points -18%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
16 fps
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps +75%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
60 fps +275%
Honor 8
43 fps +169%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps -39%
Wiko U Feel
14 fps -12%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
17 fps
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps +6%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
91 fps +435%
Honor 8
41 fps +141%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps -69%
Wiko U Feel
8.4 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.5 fps
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps +100%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
43 fps +473%
Honor 8
19 fps +153%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps -49%
Wiko U Feel
5.9 fps -21%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.1 fps
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps +1%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
44 fps +520%
Honor 8
19 fps +168%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps -75%
Wiko U Feel
3 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.8 fps
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps +129%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29 fps +504%
Honor 8
11 fps +129%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
Wiko U Feel
4.4 fps -8%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.4 fps
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps +9%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
30 fps +582%
Honor 8
10 fps +127%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
Wiko U Feel
1.9 fps -57%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
3347 Points
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points +40%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
6969 Points +108%
Honor 8
6735 Points +101%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points +23%
Wiko U Feel
3856 Points +15%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
290 Points
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points +260%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2290 Points +690%
Honor 8
2034 Points +601%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points +102%
Wiko U Feel
544 Points +88%
System (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
1281 Points
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points +79%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2986 Points +133%
Honor 8
3952 Points +209%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points -17%
Wiko U Feel
1121 Points -12%
Memory (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
774 Points
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points +39%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1983 Points +156%
Honor 8
2556 Points +230%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points -17%
Wiko U Feel
455 Points -41%
Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
740 Points
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points -10%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
4335 Points +486%
Honor 8
1703 Points +130%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points -58%
Wiko U Feel
288 Points -61%
Web (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
10 Points
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points +7070%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1071 Points +10610%
Honor 8
994 Points +9840%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points +5410%
Wiko U Feel
595 Points +5850%

Legend

 
Wiko U Feel Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo ZUK Z2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko U Feel Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
3383 Points
Sony Xperia XA
4046 Points +20%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
8436 Points +149%
Honor 8
10692 Points +216%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2730 Points -19%
Wiko U Feel
2723 Points -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
10826 ms *
Sony Xperia XA
9610 ms * +11%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3290 ms * +70%
Honor 8
2979 ms * +72%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
13046 ms * -21%
Wiko U Feel
13599 ms * -26%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
21.4 Points
Sony Xperia XA
27.5 Points +29%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
51.7 Points +142%
Honor 8
64 Points +199%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
16.8 Points -21%
Wiko U Feel
18 Points -16%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
270.9 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
240.4 MB/s -11%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
239.4 MB/s -12%
Honor 8
247.5 MB/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
147 MB/s -46%
Wiko U Feel
234.8 MB/s -13%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
137.3 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
68.6 MB/s -50%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
46.52 MB/s -66%
Honor 8
119.3 MB/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
72 MB/s -48%
Wiko U Feel
39.94 MB/s -71%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
55 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
22.05 MB/s -60%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
21.27 MB/s -61%
Honor 8
34.16 MB/s -38%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
21 MB/s -62%
Wiko U Feel
23.24 MB/s -58%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
9.4 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
10.6 MB/s +13%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
5.64 MB/s -40%
Honor 8
31.5 MB/s +235%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
11.6 MB/s +23%
Wiko U Feel
8.83 MB/s -6%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
41.98 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
72.9 MB/s +74%
Honor 8
53.7 MB/s +28%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
79.8 MB/s +90%
Wiko U Feel
30.25 MB/s -28%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime
35.21 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
50.7 MB/s +44%
Honor 8
23.59 MB/s -33%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
46.61 MB/s +32%
Wiko U Feel
16.24 MB/s -54%
Max. Load
 37.4 °C37.5 °C35.1 °C 
 37.8 °C37.1 °C34.2 °C 
 37.1 °C36.2 °C34.2 °C 
Maximum: 37.8 °C
Average: 36.3 °C
35.8 °C35 °C35.1 °C
35.4 °C35.2 °C34.9 °C
34.3 °C34.7 °C35 °C
Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 35 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.649.52525.441.33125.3374032.935.45033.644.86331.641.38028.433.11002730.112520.829.81602234.320021.334.725020.842.431521.248.140019.452.350019.557.663017.764.280017.968100017.871.8125017.371.1160017.470.4200016.769.9250017.270.1315018.273400017.976.5500017.679.8630017.776.8800017.870.91000017.966.71250018.162.51600018.249.6SPL3085.5N1.359.1median 17.9median 66.7Delta1.410.837.727.732.437.722.330.631.322.326.529.131.726.52931.4262932.337.239.432.32927.736.22924.627.628.624.623.223.425.423.228.321.821.328.330.823.223.330.834.52422.534.537.222.922.437.242.126.921.342.147.428.218.447.456.236.117.556.262.641.517.562.670.848.617.270.875.853.716.875.872.450.217.372.470.548.117.470.568.146.716.668.167.245.117.367.268.547.217.668.570.949.417.670.974.953.217.774.976.554.417.476.576.354.717.776.365.242.617.965.251.330.718.151.346.826.118.146.884.162.229.884.156.714.71.356.7median 65.2median 42.6median 17.7median 65.212.912.11.712.928.726.528.725.52725.524.426.924.430.230.330.23125.2312223.12222.621.722.625.123.325.135.731.435.728.720.728.740.12040.149.620.449.654.821.154.85719.65757.220.957.256.520.156.557.92157.959.617.959.662.217.662.265.616.665.667.316.767.366.215.266.263.316.263.362.315.262.364.31464.361.613.861.659.213.659.26013.6606113.86156.313.456.375.329.375.334.21.234.2median 59.2median 17.6median 59.27.22.97.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseWiko U Feel PrimeSamsung Galaxy J5 2016HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Wiko U Feel Prime audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.23 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.66 / 1.66 / 1.76 Watt
Load midlight 2.85 / 5.01 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Wiko U Feel Prime
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Wiko U Feel
2500 mAh
Power Consumption
-6%
-53%
-28%
17%
-33%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
0.72
-9%
1.31
-98%
0.78
-18%
0.61
8%
0.82
-24%
Idle Average *
1.66
1.5
10%
2.03
-22%
1.89
-14%
1.41
15%
1.61
3%
Idle Maximum *
1.76
1.57
11%
2.08
-18%
2.02
-15%
1.51
14%
1.8
-2%
Load Average *
2.85
3.48
-22%
5.45
-91%
5.28
-85%
2.56
10%
5.99
-110%
Load Maximum *
5.01
6.04
-21%
6.75
-35%
5.44
-9%
3.1
38%
6.7
-34%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
20h 54min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 35min
Wiko U Feel Prime
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Wiko U Feel
2500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-39%
-5%
3%
20%
-4%
Reader / Idle
1254
775
-38%
1487
19%
1599
28%
WiFi v1.3
575
353
-39%
546
-5%
499
-13%
643
12%
552
-4%
H.264
460
526
658
Load
170
255
402

Pros

+ 高分辨率,高色准屏幕
+ 出色的内存配置
+ 出色的续航时间
+ 坚固的外壳
+ 相对较快的GPS
+ 可扩展的手势控制
+ 双SIM卡

Cons

- 屏幕亮度偏低
- 麦克风音量偏低
- 主相机跑焦
- 部分边缘粗糙
In review: Wiko U Feel Prime. Review sample courtesy of Wiko Germany.
In review: Wiko U Feel Prime. Review sample courtesy of Wiko Germany.

虽然相较于Wiko’s U Feel贵70欧元(约74美元),但十分值得:Wiko’s U Feel Prime在几乎所有的测试中都完胜同系列低配款。他们的电池续航能力相当,但Wiko’s U Feel Prime有更高的分辨率,且内存配置更好,更不用说性能了。

Wiko U Feel Prime 在和其他手机的竞争中也有一些自己的优势。但在稍高一点的价位上,相比起Wiko U Feel Prime来说,荣耀8和联想ZUK2有着客观的性能提升。

但较低的屏幕亮度与轻微的亮度不均匀是一大遗憾。麦克风仍是老旧的型号,导致我们的声音在对方听来很小声。摄像头本可以有更好的素质,特别是主摄像头的锐利度堪忧。

用户将会以不到300欧元(约合316美元)的价格得到一台有着金属外壳,全高清屏幕和出色性能的手机。Wiko U Feel Prime给我们留下了良好的印象并有着出色的性价比。

总之, 在众多中低端手机中,Wiko’s U Feel Prime是一款值得推荐的手机。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Wiko U Feel Prime - 12/29/2016 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
68 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
38 / 60 → 64%
Weight
92%
Battery
92%
Display
86%
Games Performance
19 / 63 → 31%
Application Performance
35 / 70 → 49%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
66%
Average
71%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Wiko U Feel Prime 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2017-01-22 (Update: 2017-01-22)