XMG Focus 15 (Clevo NP50HK)游戏笔记本回顾。RTX 3050 Ti的极限
XMG Focus 15可以在制造商的bestware.com上进行单独配置。主页上。然而,与Schenker Technologies公司的许多其他笔记本电脑相比,配置选项变得相当少。目前只有显示器(144赫兹的全高清IPS)、显卡(GeForce RTX 3050 Ti),以及处理器(酷睿i7-11800H).你会发现工作内存有更多选择,从8GB到最大64GB不等,存储方面则使用M.2 SSD和/或2.5英寸硬盘。主要是由于2.5英寸的插槽,电池容量只有49Wh。为了使电池寿命更长,我们希望看到这里有两个M.2插槽。客户还可以选择通信模块、键盘语言和操作系统。
XMG Focus 15的价格从1199欧元(约1401美元)起。我们测试的配置有32GB的双通道内存和1TB的固态硬盘,最终价格超过1500欧元(约1753美元),这对RTX 3050 Ti设备来说是相当大的。
竞争对手包括其他15英寸笔记本电脑,其显卡为中高档或低档,如 戴尔XPS 15 9510,以及华硕TUF F15 FX506HM,以及联想Legion 5 15ACH,以及Ryzen版的睿频版的Alienware m15 R5.所有这些笔记本电脑都列在我们的比较图表中。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Possible Competitors for Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.2 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3456x2160 | |
85.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.7 % v7 (old) | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 22.85 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
案例
这款机箱基于Clevo的裸机(NP50HK机箱),几乎在所有方面都显得不显眼。除了设计相当简单外,其余方面也不引人注目。这台15英寸的笔记本电脑大多显示出干净的做工和良好的稳定性,尽管在某些地方,塑料表面可以用一些力量压住。然而,这在实际操作中从未成为一种烦恼。铰链也很牢固。虽然在打开盖子时,底座也会略微抬起,但仍然可以用一只手打开显示屏。
这款机箱的亮点是其低重量。 1.9公斤(约4.2磅)是测试领域的最低值,戴尔XPS 15也是如此。RTX 3060笔记本电脑带来了2.3至2.5公斤(约5-5.5磅)的重量。Focus 15也因其纤细的结构而得分。只有2.2厘米(约0.9英寸)的高度确保了纤细的外观,加上适度的重量,确保了良好的移动性。
装备
连接
那些可以不用Thunderbolt的人应该对Focus 15的连接设备感到满意。左侧提供了一个Kensington锁的开口,两个USB-A端口(1个2.0,1个3.0),以及两个用于麦克风和耳机的音频输出,右侧提供了一个全尺寸读卡器,一个USB-C端口(3.2 Gen2),一个额外的USB-A端口(3.0),以及一个带有折叠装置的RJ45端口。最后,电源和显示输出(HDMI 2.0,Mini-DisplayPort 1.4)的连接位于背面。
由于一些连接被放置在后面,而且USB端口分布良好,所以应该有足够的空间来使用外部鼠标。
SD卡阅读器
内置读卡器支持SD、SDHC和SDXC卡格式,并提供了一个平庸的性能。在连续读取和传输照片时,你可以期待大约80至90 MB/s。作为比较,戴尔XPS 15使用我们的AV Pro 128 GB V60参考卡突破了200MB大关。所有其他竞争对手都不提供读卡器。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
我们的测试装置使用英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201作为通信模块。除了WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax之外,它还支持蓝牙5.1。在我们的范围测试中(与Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器的距离为1米),Focus 15取得了非常好的成绩,发送数据时为1500 Mbit/s,接收数据时为1300 Mbit/s以上。凭借这些数值,它在我们的测试领域分别取得了第一名和第三名的成绩。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL |
网络摄像头
像往常一样,你不应该对网络摄像头有太多的期望。图像的清晰度和色彩还原度相当有限。
辅料
盒子里有一本快速入门手册,一张驱动DVD,一个装有软件的U盘,以及2.5英寸插槽的螺丝。Focus 15的电源是一个令人愉快的轻巧的150瓦模型。
维护
为了进入内部,你必须首先从机箱底部卸下总共15颗飞利浦螺钉。然后,你只需用很小的力气就可以掀开底盖。作为Clevo机箱的典型代表,维护选项非常好。除了电池、WLAN模块和工作内存外,你还可以接触到M.2和2.5英寸的插槽。冷却系统由两个风扇组成,每个风扇都有几根热管通向CPU和GPU(焊接在一起,所以不能更换)。
担保
基本保修期为2年(6个月快速维修)。在额外的费用下,整个保修期内还可以提供长达3年的快速维修。
输入设备
键盘
我们已经知道其他Clevo Barebones的键盘。这款可以用多种颜色和级别照明的小鸡模型提供了一个专门的数字块和相当好的打字体验。买家也应该对舒适的按键尺寸感到满意。除了WASD键之外,方向键也有一个合适的尺寸。打字的噪音既不是很安静,也不是特别大,安在中间的位置。一个积极的观点是,由于键盘的位置较高,掌托的尺寸很充足。
触摸板
触摸板也令人印象深刻。大约12×7.3厘米(约4.7×2.9英寸),对于一个15英寸的笔记本电脑来说是相当多的。遵循目前的趋势,这是一个没有专用按键的ClickPad。凭借光滑的表面和良好的精确度,鼠标移动非常顺利地成功。 然而,制造商应该改进稳定性。特别是垫子的左右边缘可以比平时压得更紧。同样的问题也出现在17英寸的机型上,该机型将很快得到审查评估。
显示
该显示屏由经典的IPS面板组成,分辨率为1920x1080像素,刷新率为144赫兹。
|
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 418 cd/m²
Contrast: 1020:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.98
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED SDC414D, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL B156HAN12.H, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 36% | -35% | 1% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 64.6 | 99.9 55% | 41.9 -35% | 65.4 1% | |
sRGB Coverage | 95.3 | 100 5% | 62.9 -34% | 96.3 1% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.5 | 98.1 48% | 43.3 -35% | 67.5 2% | |
Response Times | 74% | -102% | 10% | 42% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 18 ? | 3.6 ? 80% | 28.4 ? -58% | 13.6 ? 24% | 4 ? 78% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8.8 ? | 2.8 ? 68% | 21.6 ? -145% | 9.2 ? -5% | 8.4 ? 5% |
PWM Frequency | 59.5 ? | ||||
Screen | 49% | -99% | -40% | -13% | |
Brightness middle | 418 | 362 -13% | 268.3 -36% | 350 -16% | 329 -21% |
Brightness | 376 | 367 -2% | 257 -32% | 350 -7% | 321 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 97 17% | 84 1% | 96 16% | 92 11% |
Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.06 85% | 0.34 17% | 0.3 27% | 0.27 34% |
Contrast | 1020 | 6033 491% | 789 -23% | 1167 14% | 1219 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.67 | 2.1 -26% | 5.05 -202% | 3.9 -134% | 2.78 -66% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.88 | 4.1 -6% | 15.43 -298% | 8.2 -111% | 4.88 -26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.98 | 2.5 -155% | 3.21 -228% | 1.6 -63% | 1.63 -66% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 1.4 52% | 5.5 -90% | 5.5 -90% | 2.5 14% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.18 101% | 2.35 94% | 2.15 102% | 2.106 104% |
CCT | 6209 105% | 6608 98% | 7392 88% | 7414 88% | 6201 105% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 76 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 53% /
50% | -79% /
-86% | -10% /
-24% | 15% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
在积极的一面,我们有特别好的亮度。在最大亮度下近376cd/m²的亮度代表了我们测试领域的最佳价值,紧随其后的是戴尔XPS 15的OLED面板,为367cd/m²。这意味着你也可以在户外轻松使用这台15英寸的笔记本电脑。
由于黑值低于最佳值(0.41cd/m²),对比度值只放在领域的中间。但对于大多数买家来说,大约1000:1应该是足够的。另一方面,良好的色彩再现值得一些正面评价。15英寸的屏幕在交付状态下已经提供了一个平衡的图像。
对于色彩空间覆盖率,我们测量了95%的sRGB和66%的AdobeRGB。对于一台游戏笔记本来说,这些都是相对较好的数值。测得的8.8毫秒黑色到白色和18毫秒灰色到灰色的响应时间与其他144赫兹的IPS面板相似。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | |
↘ 8.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
测试条件
预装的控制中心允许调整各种系统设置。我们的测试是在性能模式下使用自动风扇控制进行的。
业绩
尽管我们的测试装置带来了八核CPU、32GB内存和1TB固态硬盘,但XMG Focus 15 "只 "定位于中端。GeForce RTX 3050 Ti更多的是为了那些不需要以最大细节玩每一个新游戏,并且对获得一个面向未来的设备不提出特别高要求的偶尔玩家。
处理器
在移动游戏领域,英特尔的 酷睿i7-11800H是目前最成功的处理器之一。这款10纳米的型号包含24MB L3缓存,并能够通过超线程在16个线程上同时运行。在负载下,时钟速度在2.3和最高4.6GHz之间。
在我们的Cinebench循环中,Focus 15的结果只是一般。即使CPU性能在较长的时间内保持相当稳定,并且范围高于戴尔XPS 15,但Core i7-11800H在其他笔记本电脑中仍然取得了更好的基准测试结果(例如,见华硕TUF F15)。Focus 15在与基于Ryzen 7 5800H的笔记本电脑的比较中也有困难。 Ryzen 7 5800H.然而,由于大多数3D应用都受到GPU的限制,游戏玩家在玩游戏时不必担心任何限制。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (2498 - 5408, n=50) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (520 - 586, n=47) | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (217 - 454, n=46) | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (4655 - 9851, n=40) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1429 - 1625, n=40) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (7.38 - 17.4, n=46) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (38.6 - 59.9, n=45) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (0.548 - 0.615, n=46) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
不仅仅是由于快速的固态硬盘,这台15英寸的笔记本电脑最终在系统测试中排名第一。在PCMark 10中获得6478分,排名第三,Schenker笔记本电脑的表现与Alienware m15 R5的测试配置持平。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (6019 - 6556, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (9490 - 10846, n=5) | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (8176 - 8723, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (7475 - 8577, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED |
PCMark 10 Score | 6478 points | |
Help |
DPC延迟
即使XMG Focus 15与竞争对手相比显示出相对较低的延迟,但根据LatencyMon工具,它只在有限的程度上适用于实时音频和视频处理。至少,在没有任何手动调整的交付状态下是这样的。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
我们的测试设备配备了一个强大的三星固态硬盘。970 Evo Plus的1TB版本超过了所有竞争设备中的固态驱动器,无论是美光、SK海力士还是东芝。该M.2驱动器在读取和写入数据时提供了一流的性能。
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -26% | -17% | -16% | -38% | |
Write 4K | 238.3 | 109.3 -54% | 168.1 -29% | 124.6 -48% | 116.9 -51% |
Read 4K | 55.6 | 53.9 -3% | 65.1 17% | 54.2 -3% | 44.56 -20% |
Write Seq | 3013 | 1991 -34% | 2124 -30% | 2706 -10% | 1552 -48% |
Read Seq | 2879 | 1759 -39% | 2204 -23% | 2298 -20% | 1682 -42% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 569 | 499.8 -12% | 455.3 -20% | 499.7 -12% | 497.8 -13% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 715 | 438.8 -39% | 465.6 -35% | 570 -20% | 436.8 -39% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3287 | 2835 -14% | 2911 -11% | 2999 -9% | 1461 -56% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3561 | 3235 -9% | 3519 -1% | 3461 -3% | 2364 -34% |
AS SSD | -53% | -9% | -23% | -64% | |
Seq Read | 2988 | 1362 -54% | 2873 -4% | 2960 -1% | 2082 -30% |
Seq Write | 2541 | 1440 -43% | 1619 -36% | 2586 2% | 825 -68% |
4K Read | 42.82 | 38.43 -10% | 57.5 34% | 46.84 9% | 42.41 -1% |
4K Write | 87 | 121.4 40% | 149.6 72% | 96.1 10% | 98.3 13% |
4K-64 Read | 2096 | 370.5 -82% | 1252 -40% | 854 -59% | 1255 -40% |
4K-64 Write | 2455 | 1054 -57% | 2196 -11% | 2015 -18% | 738 -70% |
Access Time Read * | 0.068 | 0.042 38% | 0.04 41% | 0.048 29% | 0.109 -60% |
Access Time Write * | 0.043 | 0.135 -214% | 0.082 -91% | 0.094 -119% | 0.17 -295% |
Score Read | 2437 | 545 -78% | 1597 -34% | 1197 -51% | 1506 -38% |
Score Write | 2797 | 1319 -53% | 2508 -10% | 2370 -15% | 918 -67% |
Score Total | 6452 | 2160 -67% | 4869 -25% | 4170 -35% | 3136 -51% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -40% /
-41% | -13% /
-12% | -20% /
-20% | -51% /
-53% |
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
为了获得最大的图形性能,从GeForce RTX 3050 Ti制造商为Focus 15配置了75瓦的TGP(包括动态提升)。有了它,这台15英寸的笔记本电脑明显领先于戴尔XPS 15,后者的RTX 3050 Ti只得到45瓦,只比一半多一点。这种情况也反映在基准运行中,尽管Focus 15并没有提供两倍的性能。
RTX 3050 Ti的最大问题是视频存储量太少。对于一个中端GPU来说,4GB已经不是最新的了。在2012年至少应该是6GB的VRAM。目前的游戏,如"死神》(Deathloop"已经要求在全高清分辨率下超过4GB,即使是在最低设置下。这意味着,Nvidia在这里过于节俭,不必要地限制了未来的实用性。你也不应该期望RTX 3050 Ti有很高的光线追踪性能。例如,在3DMark基准测试的Port Royal测试中,其结果是悲惨的,与RTX 3060,它经常在类似价格的笔记本电脑中运行。
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (7952 - 20905, n=27) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (7917 - 15611, n=26) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (3744 - 6122, n=27) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (280 - 591, n=9) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 19072 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 42503 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13179 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5963 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
尽管RTX 3050 Ti的存储量很小,但它的速度足以在高至最大细节设置的原生全高清分辨率下流畅地运行大多数游戏。只有在糟糕的编程和/或要求极高的游戏中,如"孤岛危机重制版"时,DirectX-12芯片才开始出现问题。虽然Focus 15在这里仍然领先于戴尔XPS 15,但它明显落后于使用RTX 3060的笔记本电脑,后者运行速度约为40%。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 110, n=26) |
我们通过运行角色扮演""来评估显卡在更长的3D负载下的表现。角色扮演Witcher 3"大约60分钟(FHD/Ultra)。结果是,就像CPU的性能一样,GPU的性能也保持相当稳定。
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 180 | 147 | 74.5 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 181 | 102 | 56 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 175 | 163 | 154 | 145 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 78.9 | 57.1 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 133 | 115 | 91.3 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 101 | 93 | 86 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 138 | 112 | 96.4 | |
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 92.5 | 79.2 | ||
Death Stranding (2020) | 98.1 | 89.3 | 85.8 | |
Crysis Remastered (2020) | 90.4 | 46.6 | 31.3 | |
Serious Sam 4 (2020) | 83.2 | 66.7 | 53.1 | |
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 74.1 | 68.3 | ||
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) | 172 | 151 | 138 | |
FIFA 21 (2020) | 237 | 205 | 192 | |
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) | 79.1 | 76.2 | 67.4 | |
Outriders (2021) | 76.2 | 69.5 | 57.2 | |
Resident Evil Village (2021) | 102 | 101 | 76.4 | |
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) | 115 | |||
Days Gone (2021) | 91.2 | 79.8 | 59 | |
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021) | 144 | 143 | ||
Deathloop (2021) | 72.4 | 57.4 | 51.2 |
排放
噪声排放
正如我们已经从其他Clevo Barebones知道的那样,风扇控制原来是非常不幸的,至少在性能模式下是如此。在空闲操作或要求不高的情况下,风扇不是让15英寸的笔记本电脑在低噪音水平下持续运行,而是完全安静或快速旋转到非常明显的水平。然后,Focus 15在负载下的情况就变得非常烦人了。噪声水平在56和58 dB(A)之间的噪音甚至没有达到一些RTX 3070和RTX 3080笔记本电脑也达不到。.这样不戴耳机的游戏就没意思了。除了联想Legion 5在3D操作过程中变得同样响亮之外,竞争对手在测试过程中仍然明显更安静。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25 / 30 / 43 dB(A) |
Load |
| 56 / 58 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 25% | 20% | 5% | 13% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 23.8 1% | 24.8 -3% | 24.2 -1% | 24 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 23.8 5% | 24.6 2% | 29 -16% | 24 4% |
Idle Average * | 30 | 23.8 21% | 24.9 17% | 29 3% | 25 17% |
Idle Maximum * | 43 | 23.8 45% | 24.9 42% | 29 33% | 35 19% |
Load Average * | 56 | 36 36% | 27.1 52% | 53.5 4% | 44 21% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 56 | 36 36% | 46.4 17% | 53.5 4% | 48 14% |
Load Maximum * | 58 | 38.2 34% | 49 16% | 53.5 8% | 50 14% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于显卡在使用FurMark和Prime95工具进行压力测试时被节流了,因此,如果我们用""看一下测试期间的温度发展,那是最好的。。Witcher 3."大约一小时后,机箱顶部的温度高达50℃(122°F),底部的温度高达56℃(133°F)。 对于RTX 3050 Ti设备来说,这些又是相当高的数值。所以Focus 15的冷却系统似乎不是很有效。在空闲运行期间,几乎30至40°C(86-104°F),机箱表面也变得比平时更热。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 16% | 14% | 15% | -13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 45.5 -6% | 46.4 -8% | 42.6 1% | 62 -44% |
Maximum Bottom * | 46 | 44.2 4% | 45.4 1% | 52.2 -13% | 61 -33% |
Idle Upper Side * | 39 | 27 31% | 26 33% | 24.9 36% | 36 8% |
Idle Bottom * | 40 | 26.7 33% | 27.4 31% | 25.3 37% | 33 17% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
根据我们的音频分析,声音质量还有待提高。除了低音之外,最大音量也可以更好。就声音而言,戴尔XPS 15在一个更高的联盟中发挥。
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
消耗功率
即使Focus 15提供图形切换(Nvidia 优化),空闲运行时的消耗值也相当高,为23至29瓦。大多数竞争对手的功耗都低于20瓦。在3D操作中,功耗与TGP和图形性能的比例相当好,如下图所示。
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 2.1 Watt |
Idle | 23 / 25 / 29 Watt |
Load |
106 / 156 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 45% | 18% | 15% | 2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 7.6 67% | 9.5 59% | 7.3 68% | 11 52% |
Idle Average * | 25 | 9.9 60% | 12.1 52% | 10.5 58% | 14 44% |
Idle Maximum * | 29 | 10.8 63% | 22.5 22% | 15.7 46% | 25 14% |
Load Average * | 106 | 81 24% | 99.5 6% | 108 -2% | 123 -16% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 128 | 76.2 40% | 157 -23% | 175 -37% | 176 -38% |
Load Maximum * | 156 | 131 16% | 173.5 -11% | 228 -46% | 226 -45% |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 Power Consumption
电池寿命
作为一个变化,我们使用娱乐模式而不是性能模式进行电池测试。当查看运行时间值时,很快就会发现小电池有负面作用。与竞争对手提供的80至90瓦特相比,49瓦特显得微不足道。在中等亮度的WLAN测试中,Focus 15只持续了4个小时,而戴尔XPS 15在这里能维持7个小时,华硕TUF F15甚至几乎能维持8个小时。
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 49 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 88% | 97% | 59% | 53% | 55% | |
Reader / Idle | 387 | 660 71% | 881 128% | 567 ? 47% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 235 | 420 79% | 473 101% | 290 23% | 306 30% | 376 ? 60% |
Load | 54 | 106 96% | 119 120% | 105 94% | 55 2% | 85.7 ? 59% |
H.264 | 624 | 259 | 525 | 413 ? | ||
Witcher 3 ultra | 96 | 78.3 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决书
对于所提供的东西来说太贵了。这就是你可以用一句话来概括XMG Focus 15的情况。虽然除了一些较小的细节,外壳、输入设备和144-Hz显示屏令人信服,但这台15英寸的笔记本电脑在其他大部分类别中都落后于竞争对手,无论是在电池寿命、冷却系统、风扇控制,还是声音方面。
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti的高TGP同时也是一种诅咒和祝福。
一方面,Focus 15的性能能够将许多配备RTX 3050 Ti的竞争对手甩在身后(例如戴尔XPS 15--然而那是针对多媒体用户而非游戏玩家的)。另一方面,在1000至1500欧元(约1169-1753美元)的价格范围内,GeForce RTX 3060仍然是一个明显更好的选择,即使只是因为更大的视频存储(6 GB GDDR6对4 GB)。
总之,如果再少几百欧元,而且噪音更低,Focus 15会是一个有趣的选择。但就其目前的形式而言,我们建议你买一台替代的笔记本电脑。
价格和可用性
XMG Focus 15在制造商的bestware.com上有售。商店有售,起价1199欧元(约1401美元)。
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
- 09/23/2021 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser