Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

XMG Neo 17 E24 评测--可选配水冷系统的快速游戏笔记本电脑

RTX 4080 笔记本电脑和机械键盘。

XMG Neo 17 是一款纯种游戏机，可配备市场上最快的组件。此外，还可选配 Cherry 机械键盘和外置水冷系统，不仅能降低温度，还能减少背景噪音。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Thunderbolt Windows

结论 - XMG Neo 17 专注于游戏性能

在测试中，XMG Neo 17 作为一款功能强大的游戏笔记本电脑，明显注重组件的最大性能。英特尔酷睿 i9-14900HX 在所有配置中都被用作处理器，而专用的 Nvidia GPU 则可以超频。因此，它是我们迄今测试过的速度最快的 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑之一。这为快速的 240 Hz QHD 面板提供了足够的性能，也非常适合游戏。可选的外置 Oasis 水冷系统的电路得到了改进，现在也覆盖了处理器。因此，温度大大降低，游戏时的噪音也更小。

这款游戏机在其他方面也很出色：有足够的端口可用，机箱质量上乘，可选的 Cherry 机械键盘非常出色，但声音也很大。内存/SSD 容量也可以配置，日后升级也不成问题。17 英寸笔记本相对较大，重量也不轻，只有不到 3 千克。即使不使用 Oasis 水冷散热装置，散热装置的散热效果也不错，但在游戏时风扇的声音会非常大，你应该使用耳机。

就价格而言，3000 多欧元当然不便宜，但这主要是由于GeForce GPU 的缘故。如果您正在寻找一款纯正的游戏机，并且还想利用水冷技术，XMG Neo 17 绝对是一个不错的选择。

Pros

+ QHD+ 屏幕（16:10、240 Hz、G-Sync）
+ 高系统性能
+ 坚固的金属外壳
+ 先进的 Optimus
+ 2x SO-DIMM/2x M.2-2280
+ 液态金属热复合材料
+ 雷电 4
+ 机械键盘
+ 可选水冷

Cons

- 播放时风扇很大
- 偶尔出现线圈啸叫
- 机械键盘声音大
- 无 Wi-Fi 7

价格和供应情况

申克 Neo 17 E24 可直接从Bestware 进行配置和订购。配置 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑的起价为 1,949 欧元，配置 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑的起价为 2,924 欧元。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Geizhals
Weight
Height
Display
1.
84.6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD		Listenpreis 3189€2.9 kg27 mm17.00"
2560x1600
178 PPI
IPS
2.
89.2% v7 (old)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD		Listenpreis 4000 Euro2.9 kg36 mm17.00"
2560x1600
178 PPI
IPS
3.
80.4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD		Listenpreis 1900€2.8 kg30.1 mm17.30"
2560x1440
170 PPI
IPS
4.
85.2% v7 (old)
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD		Listenpreis 4500 USD3.4 kg24.9 mm17.30"
3840x2160
255 PPI
IPS
5.
88.3% v7 (old)
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD		Listenpreis 3600 USD3 kg23 mm17.00"
2560x1600
178 PPI
IPS

申克公司推出的 XMG Neo 17 E24 是一款功能强大的 17 英寸游戏笔记本，配备 240 Hz QHD 面板（G-Sync）。处理器始终采用英特尔酷睿 i9-14900HX，显卡则有以下两种选择 英伟达GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑和其他所有型号，直至 GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑.RAM/SSD 内存可进行广泛配置，除了机械键盘外，还可选配外置 Oasis 水冷系统，该系统可显著提高笔记本电脑的散热能力。

我们的测试设备配备了专用的 GeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑GPU、32 GB 内存和来自三星的 1 TB 固态硬盘，包括机械式 Cherry 键盘在内，价格增至 3,182 欧元（基础价格为 1,948 欧元）。此外，我们还将对配备 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑和 Oasis 水冷系统（199 欧元）的 Neo 17 进行一些基准测试。

规格

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 (XMG Neo 17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 140 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU - 12 MB VRAM, Core: 2385 MHz, RAM: 2375 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 565.90, Advanced Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, max. 64 GB
Display
17.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 178 PPI, NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, 864 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27 x 381.7 x 272.8
Battery
99 Wh, 6450 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, mechanical, Cherry MX ULP Tactile, Keyboard Light: yes, 330W PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.893 kg, Power Supply: 974 g
Price
3189 Euro
Links
SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

箱子和设备

我们已经熟悉了 Medion Erazer Beast 的黑色金属底盘和橡胶底座。 Medion Erazer Beast的黑色金属机箱和橡胶底座已经非常熟悉了。机身后部有一个 LED 灯带，机盖上有一个 XMG 徽标，除此之外，没有任何恼人的制造商贴纸。Neo 17 的整体稳定性非常好，但重量略低于 2.9 千克，高度为 2.7 厘米，重量也不轻。机箱下盖可以比较容易地卸下（水冷连接处的两颗螺丝也必须拧松），你可以接触到所有重要组件，包括内存、2x M.2-2280 固态硬盘或 WLAN 模块。

连接范围非常广泛，除了充足的 USB 端口外，还提供 Thunderbolt 4 和 HDMI 接口。读卡器与我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）配合可实现平均传输速率，1080p 网络摄像头可拍摄足够清晰的照片。英特尔的 Wi-Fi 6E 模块（AX211）与我们的参考路由器配合使用时，传输速率非常高，但还不支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准。

尺寸比较

❌
398 mm 278 mm 30.1 mm 2.8 kg396 mm 278 mm 24.9 mm 3.4 kg383 mm 272 mm 36 mm 2.9 kg381.7 mm 272.8 mm 27 mm 2.9 kg380 mm 298 mm 23 mm 3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
左：Kensington 锁、USB-A 3.2 Gen.2（10 Gbit/s）、耳机输出、麦克风输入
左：Kensington 锁、USB-A 3.2 Gen.2（10 Gbit/s）、耳机输出、麦克风输入
右侧SD 读卡器，2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s)
右侧SD 读卡器，2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s)
后部：连接 Oasis 水冷系统（自密封）、USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4（40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、兼容 G-Sync、Power Delivery）
后部：连接 Oasis 水冷系统（自密封）、USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4（40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、兼容 G-Sync、Power Delivery）
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
77.2 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s 0%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
61.4 MB/s -20%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120 MB/s +49%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90 MB/s +12%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
88.7 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
80.5 MB/s
Networking
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1679 (min: 1606) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1715 (min: 1650) MBit/s ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
636 (min: 501) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1650 (min: 1031) MBit/s ∼96%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
Realtek RTL8852BE
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
850 (min: 782) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
930 (min: 466) MBit/s ∼54%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
793 (min: 386) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1214 (min: 1011) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
691 (min: 640) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1227 (min: 1158) MBit/s ∼84%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1145 (min: 867) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1194 (min: 839) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1192 (min: 941) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1465 (min: 1277) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1679 (1606-1733)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1715 (1650-1733)
ColorChecker
11.1 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
17 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24: 13.28 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 22.57 ∆E

输入设备 - Cherry 机械键盘

Neo 17 既可配备带 4 个照明区的传统薄膜键盘，也可配备带独立按键照明的机械键盘（额外收费 95 欧元）。我们的测试设备中也安装了这种键盘，使用的是 Cherry（MX ULP）触感开关。这些开关名副其实，具有非常好的触感和精确的键入感，但按键的声音也非常大。在选择时一定要考虑到这一点。大型玻璃 ClickPad（15 x 9.5 厘米）使用起来没有任何问题。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

显示屏 - QHD，240 赫兹

子像素结构
子像素结构
背光出血最小化
背光出血最小化

17 英寸 IPS 显示屏采用哑光表面，分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素（16:10），响应时间快，频率为 240 Hz，非常适合游戏。主观画质也非常出色。没有使用 PWM，也没有光晕等重大问题。

平均亮度约为 400 cd/m²，但黑阶略高，为 0.39。因此，最大对比度略高于 1,000:1，还算不错。在室外，面板的亮度应该会更高。出厂校准已经非常不错，但我们还可以通过校准进一步优化显示效果。相应的配置文件可在右侧框中免费下载。有了完整的 sRGB 覆盖范围，该面板还适用于编辑图像/视频。

425
cd/m²		406
cd/m²		421
cd/m²
387
cd/m²		412
cd/m²		407
cd/m²
373
cd/m²		392
cd/m²		384
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
NE170QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 425 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 400.8 cd/m² Minimum: 19.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 412 cd/m²
Contrast: 1056:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz		Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz		HP Omen 17-db0079ng
BOE0B67, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz		Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
BOE CQ NE173QUM-NY1, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3", 144 Hz		MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
AU Optronics B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz
Display
-0%
-3%
20%
22%
Display P3 Coverage
69
68.1
-1%
66.2
-4%
95.9
39%
97.6
41%
sRGB Coverage
98.4
99.5
1%
95.5
-3%
99.8
1%
99.9
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.6
69
-1%
68.1
-2%
84.2
21%
86.5
24%
Response Times
4%
-17%
-40%
38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.1 ?(5.9, 6.2)
11.7 ?(5.7, 6)
3%
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-19%
14.8 ?(7.2, 7.6)
-22%
4.2 ?(1.9, 2.3)
65%
Response Time Black / White *
7.2 ?(3, 4.2)
6.9 ?(2.8, 4.1)
4%
8.3 ?(3.5, 4.8)
-15%
11.4 ?(6.1, 5.3)
-58%
6.4 ?(2.8, 3.6)
11%
PWM Frequency
Screen
14%
-9%
-25%
-51%
Brightness middle
412
422
2%
363
-12%
544.6
32%
398.6
-3%
Brightness
401
388
-3%
341
-15%
507
26%
384
-4%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
84
-5%
77
-12%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.39
0.42
-8%
0.38
3%
0.48
-23%
0.46
-18%
Contrast
1056
1005
-5%
955
-10%
1135
7%
867
-18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
1.42
21%
1.74
3%
3.38
-88%
4.05
-125%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.9
1.97
49%
5.39
-38%
7.13
-83%
8.68
-123%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.9
0.7
22%
1.43
-59%
1.03
-14%
1.02
-13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
1.2
52%
1.3
48%
4.3
-72%
6.5
-160%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.078 106%
2.235 98%
2.42 91%
2.11 104%
CCT
6676 97%
6581 99%
6346 102%
7356 88%
7518 86%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / 10%
-10% / -9%
-15% / -18%
3% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 灰度校准
CalMAN 灰度校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.9 ms rise
↘ 6.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在阳光下
在阳光下
室外（明亮的白天，无阳光直射）
室外（明亮的白天，无阳光直射）
视角
视角

性能 - Raptor Lake-HX

Neo 17 专门配备了 英特尔酷睿 i9-14900HX.标准配置为 16 GB 内存，但由于有两个 SO-DIMM 插槽（附加费 260 欧元），内存容量可高达 96 GB。

 
 
 

测试条件

XMG Neo 17 提供了各种能量曲线，我们在下表中对其进行了总结。我们在基准测试和测量中使用了 "超增压 "模式，因为与"发烧友 "模式相比，噪音差异很小。制造商还提供了Deep Dive提供了有关 Neo 17 和能量曲线的更多技术背景信息。

能源概况 CPU TDP CB R23 Multi GPU TDP Time Spy 图形 CP 2077 Ultra QHD 最大风扇体积
平衡型 45 W 14,899 分 130 W 10,778 分 73.9 FPS 43.1 dB(A)
发烧级 75 W 22,027 分 150 W 18,021 分 78.6 FPS 49.9 dB(A)
超增压 160/140 W 31,740 分 175 W 19,155 分 80.7 FPS 51.9 dB(A)

处理器 - 酷睿 i9-14900HX

英特尔 酷睿 i9-14900HX仍然是速度最快的移动处理器之一，而即将推出的箭湖芯片也不太可能改变这一点。这款处理器的功耗表现非常出色，短时功耗为 160 瓦，连续功耗为 140 瓦。对于用户来说，这意味着非常高且稳定的性能。不过，在电池模式下，CPU 的最大功耗为 35 瓦，相当于在多核测试中降低了 65% 的性能，因此在电池模式下会有明显的损耗。更多 CPU 基准测试请参见 技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

02605207801040130015601820208023402600286031203380364039004160442046804940Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4773 (4743.83-4806.54)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3224 (3189.54-3263.11)
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2557 (2454.44-2575)
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4467 (4379.24-4648.46)
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4856 (4818.7-5120.98)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
87.3 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US -2!
Intel Core i9-13950HX
84.9 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
81.2 pt
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
79.6 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
75 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
66.3 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
53.4 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
32664 (29653.8min - 32664.5max) Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
31740 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
31323 (28572.5min - 31322.6max) Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17078 - 36249, n=36)
28815 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22238 Points -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=188, last 2 years)
21841 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
16494 Points -48%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2233 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2227 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1720 - 2245, n=36)
2149 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2113 Points -5%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2100 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=186, last 2 years)
1888 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1623 Points -27%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
12574 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
12083 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11543 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6579 - 13832, n=36)
10958 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8495 Points -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8311 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6440 Points -47%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
856 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
855 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (657 - 859, n=36)
824 Points -4%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
804 Points -6%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
803 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
725 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
681 Points -20%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
5121 (4818.7min - 5120.98max) Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4807 (4743.83min - 4806.54max) Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4648 (4379.24min - 4648.46max) Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 5589, n=37)
4420 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3421 Points -29%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3263 Points -32%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2575 (2454.44min - 2575max) Points -46%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
317 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
314 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (247 - 323, n=36)
305 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
303 Points -4%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
300 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points -12%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
269 Points -15%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
200 Seconds * -92%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
170.7 Seconds * -64%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
143 Seconds * -38%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (91 - 206, n=36)
121.2 Seconds * -17%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
105 Seconds * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
104 Seconds *
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
101 Seconds * +3%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
127033 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
124376 MIPS
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
121036 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (66769 - 136645, n=36)
111340 MIPS -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
92386 MIPS -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85288 MIPS -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
64759 MIPS -48%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7340 MIPS +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7095 MIPS
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
7064 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (5452 - 7545, n=36)
7021 MIPS -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6658 MIPS -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6304 MIPS -11%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
5197 MIPS -27%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18572 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18291 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13158 - 19665, n=36)
17312 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
15849 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=109, last 2 years)
14213 Points -23%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12697 Points -32%
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3077 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3074 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2419 - 3129, n=36)
2967 Points -3%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2874 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=109, last 2 years)
2650 Points -14%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2550 Points -17%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
21853 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21616 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 23194, n=36)
19403 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17082 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15012 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
11864 Points -45%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8618 Points -60%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2168 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2116 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2097 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=36)
2093 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1891 Points -11%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1765 Points -17%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1669 Points -21%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
34.5 fps +3%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
33.8 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
33.4 fps
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (16.8 - 38.9, n=36)
29.3 fps -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23.7 fps -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.5 fps -30%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
19.4 fps -42%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
77 s * -104%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=182, last 2 years)
47.3 s * -25%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
46.8 s * -24%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (31.4 - 85.1, n=36)
43.3 s * -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
42.8 s * -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
37.7 s *
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
37.6 s * -0%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4935 sec * -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.438 sec * -16%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=36)
0.3853 sec * -2%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3845 sec * -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.3823 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3772 sec *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3717 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4807 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
288 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
317 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
856 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
12083 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
31740 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2233 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
130 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1731 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
97.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
94.5 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
94.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
85.7 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
73.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
72.1 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
28521 KRay/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
27883 KRay/s -2%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
26984 KRay/s -5%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
26816 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13098 - 33474, n=35)
24776 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)
21760 KRay/s -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20114 KRay/s -29%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
144410 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
141829 Points -2%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138436 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (67573 - 166040, n=35)
124243 Points -14%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
113402 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)
106366 Points -26%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
103901 Points -28%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7026 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6946 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6905 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3589 - 7979, n=35)
6137 MB/s -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
4905 MB/s -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)
4885 MB/s -30%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4814 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144137 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
143407 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
140103 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148966, n=35)
138178 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
132613 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)
116755 Points -19%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116204 Points -19%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
16799 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
16696 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16403 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (10475 - 18517, n=35)
15240 Points -9%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15101 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
13541 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)
13213 Points -21%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
70219 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
69911 Points 0%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67115 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (32543 - 83662, n=35)
61114 Points -13%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60582 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)
53525 Points -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
50393 Points -28%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
241777 MB/s +79%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=35)
139720 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
134957 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
134830 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)
109308 MB/s -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
99333 MB/s -26%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87760 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2069 MB/s +5%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2037 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1979 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1054 - 2292, n=35)
1792 MB/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1443 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)
1361 MB/s -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1080 MB/s -45%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15367 KRay/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15367 KRay/s
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
14781 KRay/s -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14253 KRay/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6809 - 18349, n=35)
13343 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)
11721 KRay/s -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
10990 KRay/s -28%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
51118 MPixel/s +4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
50323 MPixel/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
49116 MPixel/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
49089 MPixel/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (23903 - 54702, n=35)
46809 MPixel/s -5%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41300 MPixel/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)
40119 MPixel/s -18%

系统性能

在合成系统基准测试中，Neo 17 也给人留下了深刻印象，尽管竞争对手在这方面通常非常接近。在日常使用中，这意味着系统反应极为灵敏，尽管在切换显卡时会出现短暂的卡顿。不过，这完全是正常现象，完全关闭 iGPU 即可避免。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
8963 Points +3%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8771 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8694 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (7703 - 9223, n=6)
8687 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7800 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)
7791 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (11255 - 11825, n=6)
11523 Points +2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11488 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11348 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
10871 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)
10841 Points -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10499 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
11759 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11057 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10474 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (6662 - 11410, n=6)
10243 Points -7%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10202 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)
9900 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
15287 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (14211 - 16246, n=6)
15275 Points +7%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
15221 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
14211 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)
12077 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
12023 Points -15%
CrossMark / Overall
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
2238 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1992 - 2334, n=6)
2157 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2144 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1992 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years)
1905 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1899 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1531 Points -23%
CrossMark / Productivity
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
2113 Points +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2070 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1812 - 2204, n=6)
2013 Points +11%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1846 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1812 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years)
1805 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1488 Points -18%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (2327 - 2500, n=6)
2401 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2397 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
2341 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2323 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years)
2090 Points -13%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2035 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1683 Points -30%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
2327 Points +53%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1520 - 2254, n=6)
1938 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
1874 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years)
1704 Points +12%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1681 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1520 Points
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1255 Points -17%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
332 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
332 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (310 - 345, n=6)
328 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
326 Points -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
315 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=160, last 2 years)
304 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
275 Points -17%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
314 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (300 - 321, n=6)
311 Points -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
308 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
295 Points -6%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
291 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=148, last 2 years)
267 Points -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
564 ms * -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=174, last 2 years)
503 ms * -14%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
474 ms * -8%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
467 ms * -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (437 - 446, n=6)
441 ms * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
440 ms *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
437 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8694 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77961 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77775 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77283 MB/s -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76328 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (38028 - 83392, n=35)
74992 MB/s -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67615 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
65204 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
86296 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85378 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85340 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43306 - 87568, n=35)
81259 MB/s -6%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80139 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
69101 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60660 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86590 MB/s +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77302 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77260 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
76482 MB/s -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76442 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (37146 - 80589, n=35)
72271 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
66867 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
101 ns * -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
94 ns * -14%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85.5 ns * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (76.1 - 105, n=35)
84.8 ns * -3%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84.4 ns * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
82.3 ns *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80.9 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，采用测试 BIOS 版本的系统在使用实时音频应用程序时表现出了局限性。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3493.7 μs * -66%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2103.7 μs *
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1962 μs * +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
1305.5 μs * +38%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
1123.4 μs * +47%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

两个 M.2-2280 插槽
两个 M.2-2280 插槽

Neo 17 提供两个通过 PCIe 4.0 x4 连接的快速 M.2-2280 插槽。测试设备中安装的是 1 TB 版本的三星 990 Pro，可实现快速传输速率，是市场上速度最快的固态硬盘之一。此外，即使在持续负载的情况下，性能也能保持完全稳定。初始启动后，用户可使用 864 GB。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7106 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6110 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 495 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 517 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 56.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.5 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 480 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1102 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
91.1 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
62.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
61.9 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
59.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
51.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
51.4 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
34.8 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4233 (4196.61min - 4232.61max) MB/s +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=163, last 2 years)
3478 MB/s +7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2556 - 4234, n=19)
3283 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3241 (3226.94min - 3241.38max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3238 (3056.39min - 3237.58max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2760 (2709.34min - 2760.41max) MB/s -15%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
2672 (2652.21min - 2671.88max) MB/s -18%
seq write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
9307 (5304.83min - 9307.21max) MB/s +159%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3598 - 5842, n=19)
4816 MB/s +34%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4387 (4345.42min - 4387.07max) MB/s +22%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3940 (3577.56min - 3940.13max) MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=163, last 2 years)
3810 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3598 (3547.33min - 3597.6max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2905 (2803.32min - 2905.46max) MB/s -19%
seq q8 t1 read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
12029 (6621.31min - 12029.1max) MB/s +71%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7085 (6214.7min - 7085.23max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7052 (5956.79min - 7051.62max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4958 - 7148, n=19)
6979 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
6929 (6183.66min - 6928.97max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=163, last 2 years)
6322 MB/s -10%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4998 (4326.58min - 4998max) MB/s -29%
seq q8 t1 write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
11581 (11375.7min - 11581max) MB/s +69%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6863 (6837.3min - 6863.35max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6898, n=19)
6796 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
5740 (5704.67min - 5740.32max) MB/s -16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5219 (5185.74min - 5219.39max) MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=163, last 2 years)
4867 MB/s -29%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3187 (3173.56min - 3187.38max) MB/s -54%
4k q1 t1 read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
95.9 (94.45min - 95.94max) MB/s +69%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 99, n=19)
77.1 MB/s +36%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
76.2 (75.22min - 76.22max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=163, last 2 years)
66 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
56.8 (56.66min - 56.81max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
54.5 (53.38min - 54.47max) MB/s -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
44.2 (43.54min - 44.16max) MB/s -22%
4k q1 t1 write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
397 (385.91min - 396.86max) MB/s +196%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
324 (322.91min - 324.37max) MB/s +142%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (133.9 - 343, n=19)
235 MB/s +76%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
228 (227.02min - 228.2max) MB/s +70%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=163, last 2 years)
222 MB/s +66%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
133.9 (132.36min - 133.89max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
97.6 (96.73min - 97.61max) MB/s -27%
4k q32 t16 read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
6172 (6083.33min - 6171.85max) MB/s +510%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3653 (3636.8min - 3652.63max) MB/s +261%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3467 (3436.61min - 3466.79max) MB/s +243%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4926, n=19)
3398 MB/s +236%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=163, last 2 years)
2579 MB/s +155%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1011 (977.69min - 1010.73max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
822 (788.59min - 821.86max) MB/s -19%
4k q32 t16 write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
4485 (4443.23min - 4484.95max) MB/s +788%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3447 (3336.65min - 3446.75max) MB/s +583%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=19)
2584 MB/s +412%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2354 (2252.28min - 2353.53max) MB/s +366%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=163, last 2 years)
2132 MB/s +322%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
505 (499.39min - 505.04max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
395 (366.26min - 394.87max) MB/s -22%
AS SSD
Score Total
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
13854 Points +105%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
8462 Points +25%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10591, n=19)
8285 Points +22%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8252 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6773 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6760 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4108 Points -39%
Score Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
4345 Points +158%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3177 Points +89%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3033 Points +80%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=19)
2874 Points +71%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2452 Points +46%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1683 Points
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1270 Points -25%
Score Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
7208 Points +67%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4313 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4852, n=19)
4041 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3948 Points -8%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3511 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3118 Points -28%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2264 Points -48%
Seq Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
7812.91 MB/s +39%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5638.22 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5630 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
5459.84 MB/s -3%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4362 - 5760, n=19)
5223 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4942 MB/s -12%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3717 MB/s -34%
Seq Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
9485.67 MB/s +149%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3376 - 5651, n=19)
4740 MB/s +25%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4458.9 MB/s +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3914.76 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3804 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3756 MB/s -1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1997 MB/s -48%
4K Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
89.1 MB/s +69%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
82.84 MB/s +57%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (52.7 - 90.9, n=19)
71.9 MB/s +36%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
68.69 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65.3 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
52.7 MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
51.5 MB/s -2%
4K Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
350.79 MB/s +62%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
237.11 MB/s +10%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (172.3 - 306, n=19)
221 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
216 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
194.62 MB/s -10%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
176.5 MB/s -18%
4K-64 Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
3474.56 MB/s +225%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2544.4 MB/s +138%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2404.46 MB/s +125%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (787 - 3182, n=19)
2235 MB/s +109%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1887 MB/s +77%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1068 MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
846 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
5908.55 MB/s +59%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3717 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1592 - 4090, n=19)
3352 MB/s -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3319.37 MB/s -11%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2870.73 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2533 MB/s -32%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1888 MB/s -49%
Access Time Read
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.062 ms * -244%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
0.057 ms * -217%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05542 ms * -208%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.035 ms * -94%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.018 - 0.074, n=19)
0.03384 ms * -88%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
0.02 ms * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.018 ms *
Access Time Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
0.1 ms * -488%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.064 ms * -276%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04837 ms * -185%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.021 ms * -24%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.012 - 0.053, n=19)
0.01995 ms * -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.017 ms *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
0.016 ms * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6971 (6313.69-6994.9)

图形卡

GPU-Z NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑
GPU-Z NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑

在我们的测试设备中，专用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑安装了 12GB VRAM。显卡的最大功耗为 175 瓦（150 瓦 TGP + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost），因此 Neo 17 可以充分利用 GPU。得益于高级 Optimus 图形切换功能，RTX 4080 笔记本电脑的游戏性能非常出色，完全可以满足原生 QHD 分辨率的要求。此外，即使在持续负载的情况下，性能也能保持完全稳定。

在我们的《赛博朋克 2077》环路中比较 CPU/GPU 数据时，外部水冷的优势非常明显，因为 CPU/GPU 温度降低了约 20 °C，这也是风扇工作更少的原因。

在电池模式下，GPU 的功耗限制在 52 瓦，因此 GPU 性能降低了约 53%。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
98.5 pt
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
97.7 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
95.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
90.6 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
89.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
 
84.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
64.6 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
63.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
66129 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
64540 Points +4%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
63191 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
62207 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
59348 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (45199 - 63128, n=24)
56791 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=181, last 2 years)
43915 Points -29%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
43236 Points -30%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
46191 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
44366 Points +6%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
42663 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
42022 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (33058 - 45220, n=22)
40862 Points -3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
31765 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years)
31443 Points -25%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
22104 Points +15%
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
21074 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20806 Points +9%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
19299 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19155 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (13282 - 19663, n=22)
17777 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=187, last 2 years)
13142 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12536 Points -35%
3DMark 11 Performance
45722 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
34851 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
18980 points
Help
Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
22 Seconds * -69%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=175, last 2 years)
20.9 Seconds * -61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (13 - 20, n=21)
15.1 Seconds * -16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
15 Seconds * -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13 Seconds *
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12 Seconds * +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
11 Seconds * +15%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=181, last 2 years)
36.5 Seconds * -74%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
33 Seconds * -57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (21 - 28, n=22)
22.8 Seconds * -9%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
22 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
21 Seconds *
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19 Seconds * +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
17 Seconds * +19%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
318 Seconds * -75%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=186, last 2 years)
295 Seconds * -62%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
253 Seconds * -39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (177 - 337, n=22)
230 Seconds * -26%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
185 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
182 Seconds *
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
177 Seconds * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Performance Rating - Percent
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX -1!
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
100 pt
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample -2!
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.1 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 -1!
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
92.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85.2 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US -2!
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
73.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
65.2 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng -1!
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61.5 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144.7 (63.1min) fps +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
121.3 (96.1min) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
118.9 (49.7min) fps -2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88.9 (73.4min) fps -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=78, last 2 years)
86.8 fps -28%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
200.4 fps +79%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
111.8 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 208, n=43, last 2 years)
104 fps -7%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
152.2 (3.85min, 111.1P1) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
143.4 (5.64min, 100P1) fps
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
142.4 (3.92min, 100P1) fps -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141.5 (3.53min, 100P1) fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=167, last 2 years)
113.8 fps -21%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
103.9 (5.11min, 71.4P1) fps -28%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
102.9 (4.87min, 76.9P1) fps -28%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
189.1 fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
181.1 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
173.9 fps
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
148.5 fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=179, last 2 years)
120 fps -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.2 fps -33%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
402 (69.8min, 280P1) fps +16%
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
386 (5.9min, 291P1) fps +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
371 (5min, 273P1) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
347 fps
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
258 (51.3min, 185.4P1) fps -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=177, last 2 years)
229 fps -34%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
213 (103.5min, 157.8P1) fps -39%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
195.2 (163.9min) fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
189.9 (162.8min) fps +6%
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
183.5 (157.1min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
179.7 (154.5min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (33.2 - 220, n=185, last 2 years)
150.6 fps -16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
145.6 (127.5min) fps -19%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.3 (102.1min) fps -30%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
150.2 fps +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
143.9 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
138.9 fps
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
126.8 fps -9%
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
123.4 fps -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=191, last 2 years)
108.4 fps -22%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.5 fps -36%
CPU/GPU 数据 Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Ultra（红色：RTX 4080 笔记本电脑，绿色：RTX 4090 笔记本电脑，蓝色：RTX 4090 笔记本电脑 + Oasis 水冷散热器）
CPU/GPU 数据 Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Ultra（红色：RTX 4080 笔记本电脑，绿色：RTX 4090 笔记本电脑，蓝色：RTX 4090 笔记本电脑 + Oasis 水冷散热器）

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø110.3 (99-116.6)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 181.7 143.4 135.1 163.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 220 197.1 194 179.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 226 215 173.9 134.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 202 176.8 138.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 179 162 157
Strange Brigade (2018) 381 347 239 122
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 212 176
Far Cry 6 (2021) 156 141
F1 23 (2023) 321 111.6 70.7 35.5
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 231 143 122.2 111.8 88.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 101.1 146.9 133.8 121.3 80.7
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) 197 153 129
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) 180 171 123
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) 125 97 66
F1 24 (2024) 304 323 289 112.2 71.2

排放与能源

噪音排放

两个风扇和扩展水冷通道
两个风扇和扩展水冷通道

带有两个风扇的散热系统与去年的型号基本相同，但配备 RTX 4080/4090 的 Neo 17 笔记本电脑提供了一个改进的水冷通道，现在还可以直接在 CPU 上运行。风扇一直在运转，但在执行非常简单的任务（上网、收发电子邮件、观看视频）时，只能听到非常小的噪音。但在游戏时，噪音会明显增大，达到 52 分贝（A）。虽然有更大音量的竞争对手，但在游戏时还是应该使用耳机。在基准测试/游戏过程中，还能听到一些轻微的线圈啸叫声。

Noise Level

Idle
28.1 / 28.1 / 28.1 dB(A)
HDD
0 dB(A)
Load
43.1 / 51.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.140.338.340.5412529.130.829.331.131.73127.527.92828264027.427.927.426.824.85025.52423.629.523.5632824.921.72223.6802724.52019.620.910030.825.322.92020.612531.626.220.917.32416030.42518.914.317.220033.130.117.615202503628.418.816.621.231535.82925.512.420.640036.830.519.41120.350038.43120.110.420.163039.531.518.79.621.180041.734.119.69.621.2100041.834.517.99.719.8125042.13416.51018.9160041.13215.210.217.1200040.131.214.510.616.3250039.230.512.810.814.2315039.831.412.711.612.8400040.630.213.111.613.4500040.628.412.411.812.5630038.625.712.312.112800035.42312.71212.4100003319.712.612.412.4125003221.81311.9131600028.121.112.811.412.2SPL51.943.128.223.329.1N8.54.310.51.1median 38.4median 30.1median 16.5median 11.6median 17.2Delta4.13.23.31.64hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB		Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5		HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00		Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB		MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Noise
-6%
-2%
-7%
-0%
off / environment *
23.3
25
-7%
25
-7%
23.7
-2%
23.4
-0%
Idle Minimum *
28.1
28
-0%
25
11%
31.7
-13%
24.2
14%
Idle Average *
28.1
29
-3%
29
-3%
31.7
-13%
25.6
9%
Idle Maximum *
28.1
32
-14%
33
-17%
32.9
-17%
31
-10%
Load Average *
43.1
48
-11%
45
-4%
34
21%
43.3
-0%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
51.9
48
8%
Load Maximum *
51.9
52
-0%
52
-0%
61.6
-19%
59.1
-14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
61.6
56.3

* ... smaller is better

温度

从 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑开始，申克为 CPU 和 GPU 配置了液态金属散热接口。在执行简单任务时，机箱温度保持低温，但在负载情况下，我们在某些位置测得机箱底部温度超过 50 °C。不过，由于 Neo 17 的尺寸，它不会放在你的大腿上，所以这些数值不成问题。键盘区域的发热也很明显，但没有任何限制。在压力测试中，显卡稳定在 160 瓦，处理器稳定在 70 瓦左右。

CPU/GPU 数据压力测试
CPU/GPU 数据压力测试
Max. Load
 45.9 °C46.2 °C43 °C 
 43.6 °C45.5 °C40.8 °C 
 33.5 °C30.1 °C32.5 °C 
Maximum: 46.2 °C
Average: 40.1 °C
51.2 °C56.7 °C53.9 °C
39.4 °C41.9 °C39.4 °C
32.8 °C33.8 °C34.2 °C
Maximum: 56.7 °C
Average: 42.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  50.6 °C | Room Temperature 22.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.7 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.5 °C / 92.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.6 °C / -8.3 F).
表面温度应力测试（顶面）
表面温度应力测试（顶面）
表面温度应力测试（底部）
表面温度应力测试（底部）
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Heat
1%
14%
1%
10%
Maximum Upper Side *
46.2
47
-2%
44
5%
52.2
-13%
37.4
19%
Maximum Bottom *
56.7
54
5%
45
21%
53.2
6%
45
21%
Idle Upper Side *
29.8
30
-1%
26
13%
28.6
4%
29.8
-0%
Idle Bottom *
32
32
-0%
27
16%
29.8
7%
32.4
-1%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

立体声扬声器的效果不是特别好，但偶尔播放 YouTube 视频还是足够的。不过，由于风扇声音较大，扬声器在游戏中并不实用。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.539.42531.130.6312828.24026.826.45029.526.2632229.68019.635.61002040.412517.340.616014.342.42001548.425016.650.831512.455.14001161.850010.4706309.677.58009.679.110009.774.812501068.3160010.270.2200010.666.5250010.866.2315011.662.1400011.667.3500011.872.8630012.172.480001265.31000012.4611250011.955.11600011.448.8SPL23.383.7N0.556.7median 11.6median 65.3Delta1.68.247.440.740.244.346.652.830.634.928.731.325.83518.140.515.448.717.754.119.457.322.459.12063.613.666.212.972.912.279.611.680.711.977.211.674.911.675.211.678.211.874.312.373.113.268.513.472.61479.91478.313.972.813.570.51367.21357.825.388.20.779.4median 13.2median 72.91.87.24237.234.734.545.447.129.832.725.537.63032.616.324.215.434.71842.118.546.922.553.418.655.514.757.813.765.41369.812.372.311.772.111.669.111.967.711.967.51267.612.66313.467.812.763.11359.713.364.313.66913.172.112.67412.268.225.280.20.749.2median 13median 67.51.76.133.738.733.726.828.326.822.725.122.723.123.223.128.431.328.429.226.929.232.125.132.132.321.532.335.319.935.343.221.743.246.721.146.751.121.951.153.82153.858.621.558.661.42261.468.319.968.369.523.569.565.623.265.662.325.562.362.522.462.560.922.360.954.121.254.154.91954.958.615.558.657.115.457.159.512.859.558.11258.153.211.453.248.711.448.737.410.737.474.232.974.232.91.632.9median 57.1median 21.1median 57.17.33.47.337.82937.828.226.628.229.519.529.525.620.525.62817.8283418.63440.618.840.648.91648.953.615.853.659.615.759.661.115.161.165.515.765.569.220.769.271.617.171.673.317.773.377.420.277.475.720.175.774.321.374.374.821.974.87321.77373.420.873.473.718.573.771.316.371.367.41667.467.216.467.26715.96766.613.166.664.812.464.859.712.859.760.812.560.884.43184.463.61.363.6median 67.4median 16.3median 67.45.43.15.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024HP Omen 17-db0079ngEurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HXMSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Omen 17-db0079ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

对于一款大型 17 英寸笔记本电脑来说，13 瓦的最大闲置功耗是非常低的。但在游戏时，功耗约为 300 瓦，考虑到较高的 TDP/TGP 值，这也不足为奇。提供的 330 瓦电源装置尺寸适中。不过，2.1 瓦的待机功耗过高。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.31 / 2.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 9.1 / 13.3 / 13.7 Watt
Load midlight 120.6 / 303 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stresstest

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø254 (221-303)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.89 (3.63-18.4)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø314 (266-350)

Power consumption with external monitor

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø225 (215-246)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø216 (208-219)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø78.6 (75.6-89)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø223 (220-228)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø248 (225-282)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø28.7 (28.1-31.8)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø305 (261-343)

电池寿命

Neo 17 配备了 99 Wh 电池，在 150 cd/m²（测试设备最大亮度的 58%）的 WLAN 模式下，可实现约 6 小时的正常运行时间。与同类产品相比，这款大型游戏机的续航时间处于中游水平。在设备开启的情况下，充满电需要 107 分钟，大约 45 分钟后，80% 的电池电量即可恢复。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
6h 16min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
544 min +45%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
376 min
Average of class Gaming
  (85 - 889, n=152, last 2 years)
376 min 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
374 min -1%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
363 min -3%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
284 min -24%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

XMG Neo 17 显然专注于游戏性能，而且性能非常出色。得益于可选的水冷系统，温度和风扇噪音再次大幅降低。亚光 QHD 面板的 240 Hz 和快速响应时间也非常适合游戏。

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 - 11/27/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
69 / 80 → 86%
Weight
57 / 10-68 → 81%
Battery
66 / 95 → 69%
Display
85%
Games Performance
88%
Application Performance
92%
Temperature
83 / 95 → 87%
Noise
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
77%
Camera
33 / 75 → 44%
Average
60%
85%
Gaming - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
73.7%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 31%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > XMG Neo 17 E24 评测--可选配水冷系统的快速游戏笔记本电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-11-29 (Update: 2024-11-29)