戴尔XPS 13 9310二合一评测。在一个特定方面优于XPS 13 7390二合一产品
戴尔XPS 13 9310二合一与2019年的XPS 13 7390二合一共享相同的机箱,但用较新的Tiger Lake-U第11代英特尔选项来取代旧的Ice Lake 第10代选项。因此,7390二合一的关键功能在9310二合一上都没有改变,包括MagLev键盘键,蒸汽室冷却器,13.4英寸16:10触摸屏,以及适当位置的网络摄像头。
我们的测试装置已经配置了酷睿i7-1165G7处理器,16GB LPDDR4x 4267 MHz内存,以及1920 x 1200触摸屏,价格约为1600美元。其他选项包括Core i5-1135G7 CPU,内存减半或更高分辨率的3840 x 2400显示屏。与XPS 13 9310蛤壳不同,没有OLED选项。
我们建议查看我们的 现有的关于XPS 13 7390二合一的评论来了解更多关于该机箱的物理特性,因为我们的所有评论也适用于9310二合一。这篇评论将重点关注XPS 13 9310二合一的性能,以及用户可以期望比老款但视觉上相同的7390二合一产品获得什么。
这一领域的竞争者包括其他13英寸次笔记本转换器,如 联想Yoga 6 13, 华硕ZenBook Flip 13, 三星Galaxy Book Pro 360 13, 或 微星峰会E13翻转.XPS 13 9310二合一的蛤壳版也有,只是称为XPS 13 9310。
更多戴尔评论。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.7 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.35 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2020 | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2020 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
84.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.3 kg | 18.2 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
85.4 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.1 kg | 13 mm | 13.20" | 1920x1080 |
案例--仍然是周围最时尚的敞篷车
机箱仍然与XPS 13 7390二合一产品相同。然而,戴尔测量尺寸的方式从那时起发生了变化,因此现在的官方尺寸是14.35 x 297 x 207毫米,而不是旧版7390二合一的13 x 296 x 207毫米。
连接性 - 现在有了Thunderbolt 4
上一代机型上的两个雷电3端口已被更新为雷电4。除了那些打算连接外部图形的用户外,这对大多数用户来说不会有什么影响。
SD卡阅读器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 |
沟通
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US |
网络摄像头
低分辨率的720p网络摄像头保持不变,这确实是一个令人遗憾的问题。最新的 最新的Razer Blade笔记本电脑将其网络摄像头从720p升级到1080p,而机箱没有任何其他变化,所以如果能在这台XPS 13上看到类似的东西,那就太好了。
维护
配件和保修
额外的东西包括一个USB-C转USB-A的适配器,因为该系统没有集成全尺寸的USB-A端口。包装也完全由回收材料和25%的海洋塑料制成,这是很好的环保措施。
如果直接从戴尔购买,标准的一年有限保修期适用于许多扩展选项。
显示 - 我们以前见过这样的情况
戴尔在其所有16:10的XPS 13笔记本电脑中使用相同的1200p夏普LQ134N1 IPS面板,包括XPS 13 7390二合一、XPS 13 9300蛤壳、XPS 13 9310蛤壳以及我们的XPS 13 9310二合一。这不一定是坏事,因为它仍然是一个明亮、高质量的13.4英寸面板,具有出色的色彩覆盖率(>99% sRGB),高对比度,以及锐利的像素,没有任何颗粒感问题。缓慢的黑白响应时间仍然是一个弱点,这意味着重影非常明显,特别是在游戏中。
一个更高分辨率的UHD+(3840 x 2400)选项是可用的,我们怀疑这是相同的夏普LQ134R1 IPS面板,因为发现在 XPS 13 9300.
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 555.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1588:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.76
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.98
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 13.4", 1920x1200 | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 13.4", 1920x1200 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 13.4", 1920x1200 | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AU Optronics B133HAN05.F, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Samsung, SDC414A, OLED, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 AMOLED, 13.2", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 0% | 0% | 26% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 69.7 | 70.9 2% | 69.9 0% | 69.7 0% | 99.4 43% | |
sRGB Coverage | 99 | 99.1 0% | 99.2 0% | 99.2 0% | 100 1% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.7 | 72.9 2% | 71.5 0% | 71.4 0% | 96 34% | |
Response Times | 8% | 14% | 23% | 31% | 31% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 55.6 ? | 52 ? 6% | 47.6 ? 14% | 46.8 ? 16% | 2 ? 96% | 2 ? 96% |
Response Time Black / White * | 40.4 ? | 33.2 ? 18% | 29.2 ? 28% | 28.8 ? 29% | 2 ? 95% | 2 ? 95% |
PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | 2475 ? -1% | 2500 ? 0% | 60 -98% | 60 ? -98% | |
Screen | -2% | 7% | -8% | -38% | 235% | |
Brightness middle | 555.7 | 543.3 -2% | 549.8 -1% | 291.5 -48% | 353 -36% | 287 -48% |
Brightness | 528 | 524 -1% | 520 -2% | 294 -44% | 359 -32% | 289 -45% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 92 2% | 86 -4% | 93 3% | 95 6% | 96 7% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.38 -9% | 0.39 -11% | 0.19 46% | 0.1 71% | 0.01 97% |
Contrast | 1588 | 1430 -10% | 1410 -11% | 1534 -3% | 3530 122% | 28700 1707% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.83 | 3.02 37% | 2.12 56% | 3.83 21% | 3.98 18% | 2.24 54% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.46 | 7.61 10% | 3.66 57% | 8.43 -0% | 53.07 -527% | 3.69 56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.76 | 1.23 -62% | 1.37 -80% | 1.07 -41% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 5 18% | 2.6 57% | 6.2 -2% | 1.41 77% | 2.73 55% |
Gamma | 1.98 111% | 2.02 109% | 2.3 96% | 2.2 100% | 2.39 92% | 2.46 89% |
CCT | 6686 97% | 6550 99% | 6884 94% | 6469 100% | 6346 102% | 6523 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66.8 | 65.4 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.6 | 99.7 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
1% | 7% /
7% | 5% /
-2% | -4% /
-19% | 97% /
147% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
55.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise | |
↘ 28 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2500 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 英特尔Tiger Lake-U的救援
处理器 - 表现不佳
CPU性能波动很大,就像我们在XPS 9310蛤壳上观察到的那样,配备了相同的 酷睿i7-1165G7处理器。CineBench R15 xT得分可以从480分到750分不等,相比之下,XPS 13 7390二合一或ZenBook Flip 13的时钟速率更加稳定。 ZenBook Flip 13.因此,处理器性能可能比上一代的 酷睿i7-1065G7在某些时候。
在运行任何基准测试之前,我们的设备通过戴尔电源管理器软件被设置为超性能模式,以获得尽可能高的分数。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=81) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=81) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2525 - 6862, n=64) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1110 - 1539, n=59) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=86) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=78) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=80) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=80) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=80) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=77) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=77) | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78) | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80) |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
PCMark 10的分数是我们期望的,相对于其他配备相同Core i7 CPU的笔记本电脑。与旧的XPS 13 7390二合一产品相比,最大的收获是在GPU重的数字内容创作基准中,我们的Iris Xe可以轻松地超过Iris Plus G7。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4531 - 5454, n=50) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8997 - 11505, n=50) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5570 - 7136, n=50) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4083 - 5550, n=50) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5177 points | |
Help |
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示在我们的主页上打开多个标签或运行Prime95压力时没有延迟问题。在60FPS下的4K UHD播放也很流畅。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了相同的东芝BG4 PCIe3 NVMe SSD与老款XPS 13 7390二合一产品相同。然而,我们不会惊讶地看到一些单位使用美光的SSD来代替。没有对PCIe4速度的支持,而不像在 最新的Vaio Z.
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 70% | 2% | -28% | 15% | |
Seq Read | 2031 | 2091 3% | 1801 -11% | 1860 -8% | 1771 -13% |
Seq Write | 776 | 1396 80% | 1125 45% | 500 -36% | 894 15% |
4K Read | 49.55 | 49.29 -1% | 39.7 -20% | 36.26 -27% | 53.5 8% |
4K Write | 112.2 | 104.2 -7% | 67 -40% | 118.6 6% | 157.8 41% |
4K-64 Read | 1058 | 827 -22% | 1253 18% | 419 -60% | 478.1 -55% |
4K-64 Write | 328.9 | 1636 397% | 209 -36% | 219 -33% | 741 125% |
Access Time Read * | 0.072 | 0.066 8% | 0.069 4% | 0.102 -42% | 0.156 -117% |
Access Time Write * | 0.518 | 0.365 30% | 0.625 -21% | 0.17 67% | 0.023 96% |
Score Read | 1311 | 1086 -17% | 1472 12% | 641 -51% | 709 -46% |
Score Write | 519 | 1880 262% | 388 -25% | 388 -25% | 988 90% |
Score Total | 2447 | 3499 43% | 2583 6% | 1300 -47% | 2034 -17% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1103 | 1544 40% | 1293 17% | 880 -20% | 960 -13% |
Copy Program MB/s | 331.7 | 613 85% | 560 69% | 185.3 -44% | 648 95% |
Copy Game MB/s | 828 | 1451 75% | 927 12% | 212.7 -74% | 882 7% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 24% | -3% | -20% | -12% | |
Write 4K | 129.6 | 97.5 -25% | 106.7 -18% | 89.2 -31% | 170.6 32% |
Read 4K | 52.2 | 50.9 -2% | 49.94 -4% | 33.09 -37% | 44.51 -15% |
Write Seq | 1310 | 1811 38% | 1223 -7% | 988 -25% | 872 -33% |
Read Seq | 1726 | 1836 6% | 1801 4% | 1322 -23% | 1188 -31% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 334.7 | 521 56% | 325.3 -3% | 332.6 -1% | 483.1 44% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 447.6 | 357.5 -20% | 551 23% | 389.3 -13% | 284.3 -36% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1410 | 2879 104% | 1224 -13% | 984 -30% | 950 -33% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2390 | 3204 34% | 2350 -2% | 2461 3% | 1872 -22% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 47% /
53% | -1% /
0% | -24% /
-25% | 2% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--比Iris Plus G7有巨大提升
虹膜Xe图形性能是一个显著的升级,从 Iris Plus G7根据3DMark基准测试,去年的XPS 13 7390 2-in-1的Iris Plus G7显卡性能大幅提升,提升幅度高达60%至90%。用户应该看到支持DX12而不是DX11的游戏的最大跳跃。
然而,性能并不总是稳定的。例如,简单地在 Witcher 3在低设置下空转一小时,会导致帧率在70-98FPS之间波动。因此,虽然平均性能很好,但它可能会周期性地减慢相当大的幅度。这种行为我们在前几代XPS 13机型上也观察到了。
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7676, n=202) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1926 - 7661, n=201) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7018 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 19494 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4786 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1778 points | |
Help |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14.9 - 56.5, n=183) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.5 - 31.2, n=179) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.15 - 27.8, n=172) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 |
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (52 - 166.4, n=162) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (34.7 - 132.1, n=136) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (24.1 - 149.3, n=165) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (20 - 119.3, n=137) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9.39 - 51.6, n=157) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4.13 - 22.9, n=151) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US |
X-Plane 11.11 | |
1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13.4 - 88.4, n=212) | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.6 - 69.5, n=213) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.1 - 59.8, n=212) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 |
Strange Brigade | |
1280x720 lowest AF:1 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (48.5 - 115.1, n=168) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (18.2 - 51.4, n=166) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (15.4 - 39.8, n=165) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13.2 - 31.7, n=163) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA |
Far Cry 5 | |
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (23 - 75, n=92) | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (15 - 48, n=41) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14 - 39, n=90) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10 - 35, n=88) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11 - 33, n=74) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 96.7 | 80.5 | 25.4 | 10 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 86.2 | 54.3 | 29.9 | 14.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 109 | 61.4 | 52.8 | 52.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 36.8 | 21.8 | 15.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 23.5 | 31.9 | 31.3 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 49 | 23 | 22 | 22 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 78.1 | 36.8 | 29.4 | 24 |
Emissions
系统噪音 - 在大多数中低负荷下都很安静
风扇行为与我们在XPS 13 7390二合一上观察到的几乎相同。主要的区别是,当运行3DMark 06等高负载时,风扇噪音可能会更快地提升,这可能是由于与Ice Lake 相比,Tiger Lake-U的涡轮增压和PL2限制更高。否则,用户可以预期在运行高要求的负载时,风扇噪音在38至43 dB(A)之间,或者在视频流或网络浏览时高达27.2 dB(A),而安静的背景为24.3 dB(A)。新的Galaxy Book Pro 360 13将表现出类似的结果。
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | -8% | -1% | -12% | -7% | |
off / environment * | 24.3 | 25.7 -6% | 28.1 -16% | 25.1 -3% | 27 -11% | 27 -11% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.8 | 25.7 -4% | 28.1 -13% | 25.1 -1% | 27 -9% | 27 -9% |
Idle Average * | 24.8 | 25.7 -4% | 28.1 -13% | 25.1 -1% | 27 -9% | 27 -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.8 | 25.9 -4% | 28.1 -13% | 25.1 -1% | 27 -9% | 27 -9% |
Load Average * | 38 | 26.2 31% | 31.7 17% | 41 -8% | 46 -21% | 40.7 -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38 | 36.5 4% | 43.4 -14% | 38.6 -2% | ||
Load Maximum * | 41.5 | 36.6 12% | 43.4 -5% | 38.7 7% | 46.6 -12% | 40.7 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.8 / 24.8 / 24.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 38 / 41.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A) |
温度 - 相对凉爽的掌托
表面温度几乎与我们在Ice Lake-powered XPS 13 7390 2-in-1上观察到的相同,顶部和底部热点分别为50 C和57 C。键盘台面的温度仍然明显高于其他大多数次笔记本,包括新的三星Galaxy Book Pro 360.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
压力测试--循环的时钟频率和帧率
当使用Prime95时,CPU的时钟速率和温度会激增,并在最初的几分钟内保持稳定,达到2.9 GHz和100 C。此后,即使通过戴尔电源管理器软件设置为超性能模式,时钟速率和温度将分别下降并稳定在1.8至2.2 GHz和66至75 C范围内。相比之下,搭载Ice Lake 的XPS 13 7390二合一电脑在更高的核心时钟速率和温度下都会稳定下来。因此,较新的XPS 13 9310二合一似乎是以较低的核心温度为目标,尽管是以较高的Turbo Boost性能为代价。在压力下的循环时钟速率反映了我们上面的CineBench R15 xT循环得分。
在运行Witcher 3 ,GPU时钟速率也会在800至1280 MHz之间循环,这也反映了我们上面提到的循环帧速率。不幸的是,XPS 13上没有 "稳定性能选项",而用户可能更喜欢这种循环行为。
用电池供电运行会限制性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为9805和5106分,而在主电源上则为11424和6569分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 32 |
Prime95压力 | 1.8 - 2.2 | -- | 66 - 75 |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 1.4 - 1.6 | ~650 - 750 | 68 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~0.6 - 1.4 | ~800 - 1280 | 71 |
发言人
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management
耗电量 - 更加省电
尽管图形性能大幅提高,但该系统在游戏时消耗的电力比老款XPS 13 7390二合一产品要少。这表明Iris Xe在电源效率和性能方面可以比Iris Plus G7有多大的飞跃。
Off / Standby | 0.35 / 0.54 Watt |
Idle | 2.6 / 6.4 / 7.7 Watt |
Load |
29.9 / 47.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD, AMOLED, 1920x1080, 13.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -11% | -9% | -20% | -11% | -22% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 3.9 -50% | 2.6 -0% | 5 -92% | 4.4 -69% | 5 -92% |
Idle Average * | 6.4 | 5.9 8% | 5.3 17% | 6.3 2% | 7.4 -16% | 6 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 6.3 18% | 7 9% | 6.9 10% | 11.3 -47% | 11.7 -52% |
Load Average * | 29.9 | 39.7 -33% | 43.1 -44% | 41.5 -39% | 22 26% | 28 6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.2 | 34.8 -8% | 43.1 -34% | 33.2 -3% | 22.8 29% | 28.3 12% |
Load Maximum * | 47.5 | 47.5 -0% | 49 -3% | 46.5 2% | 42.5 11% | 53 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
电池寿命 - 两位数的运行时间
运行时间与我们在XPS 13 9310蛤壳上记录的时间非常接近,同时比老款XPS 13 7390二合一产品多出近两个小时。在11小时的实际WLAN浏览中,电池应该足以满足一天的有效使用。
从空电到满电仍然需要大约1.5小时。45瓦的USB-C适配器也可用于为其他设备充电。
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 51 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7, 60 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 67 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 5% | -16% | -16% | -7% | 12% | |
Reader / Idle | 1525 | 1800 18% | 1050 -31% | 1227 -20% | 1880 23% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 643 | 657 2% | 537 -16% | 791 23% | 639 -1% | 725 13% |
Load | 205 | 193 -6% | 121 -41% | 203 -1% | 203 -1% |
Pros
Cons
结论--更快,无额外费用
XPS 13 9310 2合1提供了比XPS 13 7390 2合1更快的图形性能。更好的是,该系统在相同的功率包络下实现了这一点,这意味着用户获得更好的图形,而不需要牺牲电池运行时间、表面温度或风扇噪音。如果你做大量的图形编辑工作,那么从旧的UHD Graphics 或去年的Iris Plus G7升级到Iris Xe,你无疑会受益匪浅。
英特尔Iris Xe对XPS 13系列来说是一个巨大的福音,但与大多数其他超极本或副本相比,CPU和GPU的时钟速率不稳定,可能会让一些电力用户感到困扰。
不幸的是,处理器的性能几乎没有改善,从 酷睿i7 XPS 13 7390 2-in-1.在我们的酷睿i7 XPS 13 9310 2-in-1上,时钟频率往往更容易波动,而缺乏任何新的显示选项是拥有较新机型的一个少的激励因素。因此,许多家庭用户会发现,与XPS 13 7390 2-in-1相比,XPS 13 9310 2-in-1最多只能获得很少的收益,特别是当旧型号可以找到更便宜的时候。
价格和可用性
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1
- 10/02/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo