Xiaomi Mi Series
Processor: unknown, Intel Atom x5 Z8500, Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956, Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC, Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 636, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 821, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 835, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 845, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 855Graphics Adapter: unknown, Imagination PowerVR GE8320, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Qualcomm Adreno 330, Qualcomm Adreno 405, Qualcomm Adreno 418, Qualcomm Adreno 430, Qualcomm Adreno 506, Qualcomm Adreno 509, Qualcomm Adreno 510, Qualcomm Adreno 530, Qualcomm Adreno 540, Qualcomm Adreno 630, Qualcomm Adreno 640
Display: 0.50 inch, 5.00 inch, 5.15 inch, 5.20 inch, 5.50 inch, 5.70 inch, 5.84 inch, 5.99 inch, 6.00 inch, 6.39 inch, 6.40 inch, 6.44 inch, 6.90 inch, 7.90 inch
Weight: 0.129kg, 0.13kg, 0.132kg, 0.133kg, 0.135kg, 0.145kg, 0.149kg, 0.15kg, 0.161kg, 0.163kg, 0.165kg, 0.166kg, 0.168kg, 0.185kg, 0.187kg, 0.189kg, 0.203kg, 0.209kg, 0.211kg, 0.218kg, 0.221kg, 0.255kg, 0.332kg
Price: 0, 200, 210, 250, 300, 350, 400, 470, 500, 600, 799 euro
Average of 526 scores (from 1094 reviews)
Xiaomi Mi 4i
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi 4iProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 405
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.13kg
Price: 300 euro
Links: Mi 4i (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So there you have it, for this closer look at the Xiaomi Mi 4i! There’s no denying that this is a really good phone that features an unbeatable price tag, but Xiaomi’s marketing of the Mi 4i being an “affordable flagship” is quite misleading. Affordable, definitely, but flagship, not quite. While you do get excellent design and build quality, great display, impressive battery life, and a good software experience, its processing package, and the availability of just 16 GB of non-expandable storage puts this device in the mid-range.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/29/2015
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 4i bridges the gap between the flagship Mi series and the Redmi lot, a likable gadget but not in the sense of a pet - it may be an affordable phone but not underpowered and full of compromise. No, on paper everything seems near perfect for the Mi 4i. And for the most part, the Xiaomi Mi 4i lives up to its promise. Its 5" 1080p screen is great and the imaging department is quite capable as well. Both the 13MP primary unit and the 5MP selfie cam produce good images with great detail and subtle processing. The thoughtful design results in a great handling experience, the connectivity options are above average, and the battery backup is solid.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/10/2015
Xiaomi Mi Note Pro
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi Note ProProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 430
Display: 5.70 inch, 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixels
Weight: 0.161kg
Price: 500 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
My only other niggles with the Pro are a keyboard backlight that's either on or off with no adjustment for duration or brightness, a rather mundane one-megapixel webcam, and cooling fans that when working full-tilt can be a little intrusive.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As our first Xiaomi phone ever to be reviewed, there are a lot of thoughts to be had on this phone, more than a usual review. However, in order to discuss them we need to start by talking about what we’ve learned throughout the testing process. Probably the best place to start is design. Xiaomi is clearly capable of creating a phone that is well designed, and it shows with the Mi Note line.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/11/2015
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The specs are mighty fine with this, we’re not denying that, but it still performs slightly behind the Note5 in many areas. Furthermore, it doesn’t have the nearly the same amount of diversified features that cater to power users, so its particular user experience might be thought of as limiting to some folks. The low cost and drool worthy specs sheet give the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro a lot of credibility in generating attention, however, it still lacks the solid performance and meaningful experiences to really give the Note5, as well as some other noteworthy phones in the same caliber, any sort of threat.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/11/2015
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Androidbeat EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At the end of the day, I can’t see many AndroidBeat readers opting to import one of these, though. There’s nothing intrinsically wrong with the Mi Note Pro, in some ways it’s an Android powerhouse. But at the same time, you can get more functions, more flexibility, more familiarity, and more manufacturer and retailer support from a vanilla Galaxy Note 4 for roughly the same outlay, now at summer 2015 pricing in most of the world.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/13/2015
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So there you have it for this in-depth look at the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro! Xiaomi claims that the Mi Note Pro is the best smartphone in the world, and while that statement is certainly subjective, the device does manage to impress in key aspects, with regards to build quality, performance, the camera, software, and the overall user experience. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is definitely a worthy competitor to the current crop of Android flagships, and it is actually quite a shame that, at least for now, more people won’t be able to get their hands on it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/09/2015
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2017
Xiaomi Mi 4c
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi 4cProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 418
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.132kg
Price: 300 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Based on the specs, build quality and software alone, the answer is a resounding yes. The Mi4C is well made, has a fantastic 1080p screen, sports a wonderful camera and is compact and comfortable to use. It also has one of the best Android UI skins on the block in the shape of MIUI 7 – even if it does copy Apple's iOS to an almost shameless degree.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/18/2015
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
On paper the Xiaomi Mi 4C is an excellent mid-range Android phone, with a fantastic spec for the money - it's half the price of the Nexus 5X and can be just as fast. There's a generous battery, a fairly good camera and some interesting new features such as USB-C. However, our benchmarking showed overheating to be a problem, and the issues we experienced with software out of the box make it difficult to recommend to less techie users.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/12/2015
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% features: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The bottom line is this: If you are on a budget, want the best bang-for-buck, and don't mind to manually pamper the phone on a regular basis, the Mi 4c is certainly a hard choice to overlook.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/02/2015
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We aren't sure if the Xiaomi Mi 4c was a necessary upgrade over the Mi 4i, but we are still glad for its existence. The Mi 4c has a lot going on for it - it is beautiful and comfy, it punches above its class when it comes to performance, it has an amazing still camera and great MIUI 7 interface.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/21/2015
Source: Fudzilla EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All in all, the Xiaomi Mi4c is a jack of all trades, an excellent all-round 5-inch smartphone. It’s compact, light, well designed and well built. The screen is top notch, and so is the camera. It packs a processor that wouldn’t be out of place in a $500 phone. The storage is fast, although 16GB feels cramped in this day and age. Sure, you can go for the 3GB/32GB version, but at $275 it almost as much as the proper Mi4, or the Meizu MX5. Too bad there is no 2GB/32GB model under the $250 mark. For the time being, only the 2GB/16GB model is available, in black and white. If you want a pink, yellow or cyan Mi4c, or if you want the 3GB/32GB version, you’ll have to wait.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/15/2015
Xiaomi Mi4
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi4Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 330
Display: 0.50 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.149kg
Price: 300 euro
Links: Mi4 (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Fudzilla EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi4 Overseas Edition is a strange phone. It’s a 3G flagship in an era of 4G mainstream phones, so it’s clearly not a good choice for people who want to use the fastest possible mobile data standard. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, because 4G is simply not available in a lot of markets, and coverage is spotty even in countries that already have a 4G infrastructure. If you live in a country with no 4G, or in a remote location where you can only use 3G, the watered down Mi4 starts to make perfect sense. The Mi4 Overseas Edition sells for $227 via GearBest, but if you pounce over the next few weeks, you can use coupon GBMI4 to get it down to $205 (valid till January 15). Basically the Mi4W costs as much as a mid-range phone. It’s actually slightly cheaper than the Mi4c we had a chance to review a couple of months ago.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/10/2015
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi MiPad 2Processor: Intel Atom x5 Z8500
Graphics Adapter: Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
Display: 7.90 inch, 4:3, 2048 x 1536 pixels
Weight: 0.332kg
Price: 200 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
iPad Mini clone. The Chinese manufacturer Xiaomi launches a 7.9-inch tablet dubbed MiPad 2 on the market that is a carbon copy of Apple's iPad Mini. Unlike its Cupertino twin, the MiPad 2 is powered by Google's Android operating system and is relatively affordable. It has quite a lot to offer for its price...
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Once you dive into the world of Mi, it is important to mention that you are joining a large and friendly community of technology enthusiasts. This does not have to matter to you, but the culture around the brand is light-hearted and filled with fun mascots and accessories. Xiaomi pays close attention to its users, if ever you wanted to help influence what the next manufacturer built device or software will include, this is the ecosystem that you want to get involved with.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If money is no object then the iPad mini 4 is the superior tablet here with all-round quality on offer. That's not to say the Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 is bad, though. We're really impressed with it and you can save a lot of cash this way. However, prepare yourself for a slightly odd Android experience which requires some tweaking due to its Chinese roots.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 02/09/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Whether Xiaomi intended to or not, the Mi Pad 2 is an Android tablet disguised as an iPad mini. This may disgust you or be exactly what you're looking for. Either way, we can't deny that this is a well-made, stylish tablet with decent specs for the price. You're best off getting the 64GB model and if the iOS style user interface is a turn-off, remember that Android is highly customisable.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/26/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 90% features: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 24/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Putoinformatico ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2017
Source: Saggiamente IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tablety PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi 4sProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 418
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.133kg
Price: 350 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
高端手机,主流价位。 Mi 4s的300美元(约1951人民币)售价对于旗舰机型来说十分有竞争力。请参考我们的评测了解这台小米手机相比其他主流和旗舰机型表现如何。
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There is no doubt that the Xiaomi Mi 4S is a great smartphone, especially for the price. Despite its flaws of a lack of global availability, disappointing low-light camera performance, and an outdated version of Android, there are several reasons why the Mi 4S may be appealing. Its very nice display, impressive performance for the price, excellent battery life, and great daylight camera performance may be enough to win over many who would have instead purchased the Mi 5.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 86% display: 86% mobility: 86% workmanship: 84%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There is no doubt that the Xiaomi Mi 4S is a great smartphone, especially for the price. Despite its flaws of a lack of global availability, disappointing low-light camera performance, and an outdated version of Android, there are several reasons why the Mi 4S may be appealing. Its very nice display, impressive performance for the price, excellent battery life, and great daylight camera performance may be enough to win over many who would have instead purchased the Mi 5.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 86% display: 86% mobility: 86% workmanship: 84%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 4s goes right by the book and pays due respect to its predecessors while genuinely trying to stand out and increase its chances of getting noticed. The Mi 4s improves on both the original Xiaomi Mi 4 and the Mi 4c version with more - and expandable - storage, a beefier battery and a fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 4s goes right by the book and pays due respect to its predecessors while genuinely trying to stand out and increase its chances of getting noticed. The Mi 4s improves on both the original Xiaomi Mi 4 and the Mi 4c version with more - and expandable - storage, a beefier battery and a fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2016
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 82% display: 90% mobility: 82%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 82% display: 90% mobility: 82%
Source: GadgetGear.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GadgetGear.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Xiaomi Mi 5 Pro
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi 5 ProProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Display: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.13kg
Price: 600 euro
Links: Mi 5 Pro (Model)
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 Pro feels like a handset to match many of the other devices we've seen launch recently. With a release date planned for 1 March for the Chinese market, it will then be launching in India with more territories planned for the future. We're yet to see exactly what that means, or exactly how much it might cost, but we're looking at around £300 for a flagship spec handset, half the price of mainstream rivals.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/24/2016
Xiaomi Mi 5
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi 5Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Display: 5.15 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.129kg
Price: 300 euro
Links: Mi 5 (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Light smartphone heavyweight. The newest flagship model by the Chinese manufacturer Xiaomi proves that it has arrived in the premium smartphone sector. High-end specifications, a generous configuration, weight of just 129 grams, and high-quality glass casing: These clearly challenge established companies at a local street price of just below 300 Euros (~$332).
Foreign Reviews
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi's best handset yet should worry the established names in the Android sector - it offers the same performance for half the price. A remarkable mobile in almost every regard.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: University Herald EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With this next generation technology in the Mi 5S, the phone will enable sensors on its panels and frames without any dedicated spot. Other leaked specs include the 5.15 inch screen and 6 GB of RAM paired with 256 GB of internal storage. The handset will sport 16 MP rear camera and pack 3,490 mAh battery. It will be powered by Snapdragon 821.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/16/2016
Source: Soycincau EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So, is the Mi 5 for you? Well, if you want a well-built, light, ergonomically-sound “flagship” smartphone and only have RM1,549 to spend then probably yes. In fact, you could probably get it for less than the RRP if you pick it up with promo codes or through cashback services.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/15/2016
Source: Fudzilla EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To sum up: With the Mi5, Xiaomi is back in the flagship space, after skipping one product cycle. It’s a great comeback, and since Xiaomi prices tend to tumble a few months after launch, chances are the Mi5 will become even more attractive from a price/performance perspective in the near future. None of this would have been possible without Qualcomm’s stellar Snapdragon 820 and its custom Kryo CPU cores. Kudos to the gifted engineers in both outfits, they’ve done an impressive job.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/09/2016
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But on comparing the camera features, OnePlus 3 lags behind somewhat as Mi 5 offers more camera enhancements than OnePlus 3 camera. The camera on OnePlus 3 uses a stock interface that has nothing much to offer but it can be replaced with a nice third party camera app to avail the features. The camera on Mi 5 supports HDR, Panorama, Timer, Audio, Manual, Straighten, Beautify, HHT, Tilt-shift, Fish eye, Slow motion, Burst shot while OnePlus 3 stock camera offers HDR, HD, Manual, RAW, Panorama, Beauty, Time-lapse, Slow motion, Burst shot.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 07/29/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Finally, we’d like to re-emphasize our point from the beginning of this comparison: the Xiaomi Mi 5 might have prices starting from $300 ($340 for the mid-tier 64 gig model and $400 for the 128GB one) in China, but if you import it from your average eBay re-seller you’d have to put a $100 on top of each of those prices. And all you get usually is a shabby 30-day warranty with no manufacturer service or warranty. No surprise: the Xiaomi Mi 5 is NOT meant to be sold outside of China (and maybe India and the adjacent markets). And that’s a risk that you have to know about.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/13/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We end with reminding you: the Xiaomi Mi 5 is not a phone meant to be sold in the U.S. or Europe. It’s only available via unofficial channels (you can find it on eBay in the United States and shop from resellers with European warehouse like GizChina’s shop in the EU), but dealing with warranties and repairs would be a huge pain. That’s probably the biggest downside to owning a Xiaomi phone right now. Then, there is the price: the phone is sold for a full retail price of $300 to $400 in China, while third-party resellers add a $100 premium on top of that.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/13/2016
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The one-word review for this phone is "impressive". That's the word I keep coming back to. The Xiaomi Mi5 is impressively designed, impressive in its battery life, and genuinely impressive in terms of power and performance. It's reasonably easy to build a cheap phone these days, and it's reasonably easy to build a powerful phone – but you usually can't do both. For the £300 (US$450) or so that the Mi5 is available for you would expect a fair few compromises to have been made, but there are almost none.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Wired Magazine EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It’s an excellent phone that, while lacking visual flair, makes up for it with great hardware and an innovative customized Android experience. One last note about that software. The Mi 5 comes in two different versions: one for the Chinese market with Xiaomi’s Mi Store on board, and one for international markets with the Google Play Store and Google’s services. If you’re going to buy it somewhere online and you don’t live in China, be sure to get the international version.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the Xiaomi Mi 5 is a great all-around smartphone, only customers in China and India will be able to score it at bargain prices, starting at the equivalent of around $300 for the 32GB model. Shoppers from the rest of the world can buy the Mi 5 from eBay and other web stores, but chances are they'll end up paying a higher price. Most online retailers who sell Xiaomi products charge a price premium and ship their stock from China, which means you'll have to handle any import and sales taxes imposed by your state or country. Depending on where you are, these can be costly!
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With its fantastic array of high-end parts, the Mi 5 is a superb option. The package is only made sweeter by the its low price. The Xiaomi Mi 5 is around £300 cheaper than rival devices – such as the Galaxy S7 and HTC 10 – that run on similar hardware . Yet, it doesn’t feel like it. While it may not be quite as sturdy as those higher priced phones, it performs just as well.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% performance: 90% features: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Should Mi 4 users upgrade to the Mi 5? That depends on 3 factors – 4G connectivity, slim form factor, a faster phone. On the software front, there isn’t much that will be different. If you have a higher budget, you can certainly go for the Samsung Galaxy S6. The only real issue with any Xiaomi phones is the flash sale model, where a lot of potential buyers just do not manage to get through on the day of the sale and are frustrated at not being able to buy the phone. So, if you’re willing to be patient with the Mi 5 flash sales, this phone certainly offers a good value proposition.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 85%
Source: Androidbeat EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Should you buy the Xiaomi Mi 5? If you don’t mind MIUI and the average camera, then yes. However, money is not the only thing you will need to buy the handset. You will also need patience and an hour in hand. Due to demand exceeding supply, Xiaomi currently only sells the Mi 5 in India on Wednesday at 2PM through its official website, where it usually goes out of stock within a minute or two. Worse, Xiaomi only sells the white variant of the Mi 5 in India right now with 32GB of storage space. Since the phone lacks a microSD card slot, the lack of a higher 64GB offering from Xiaomi can be a deal breaker for many. If you are ready to live with these compromises, the Mi 5 is almost a no-brainer, as it offers the best value for money in its range.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A fantastic Android flagship that comes in at an outrageously low price, the Xiaomi Mi 5 has the braun and the beauty to match the greats. Perhaps not a wise choice for first time Android users, but those comfortable in customising the setup will love the excellent-value, gorgeously designed Xiaomi Mi 5.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 90% features: 90%
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Should Mi 4 users upgrade to the Mi 5? That depends on 3 factors – 4G connectivity, slim form factor, a faster phone. On the software front, there isn’t much that will be different. If you have a higher budget, you can certainly go for the Samsung Galaxy S6. The only real issue with any Xiaomi phones is the flash sale model, where a lot of potential buyers just do not manage to get through on the day of the sale and are frustrated at not being able to buy the phone. So, if you’re willing to be patient with the Mi 5 flash sales, this phone certainly offers a good value proposition.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 85% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 85%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, there’s no denying that Xiaomi has made yet another excellent smartphone. The Mi 5 undercuts the best smartphones on the market in price but not nearly as much in features as in previous years. Although its lack of U.S. availability and 4G LTE support are a major hurdle, its low-light camera may be somewhat disappointing, and MIUI could use a few updates, there’s certainly a lot to love about the Xiaomi Mi 5.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 89% display: 87% mobility: 91% workmanship: 90%
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 without a doubt pushes the boundaries of what has been achievable in an affordably priced handset. The phone brings top of the line performance, amazing battery life and stunning design for a price point of Rs. 24,999 which is unprecedented. Sure, the camera could be a bit better and we do lament the absence of a higher capacity variant in India but we can’t help but recommend the Xiaomi Mi 5 as a device that lines up right alongside the current generation flagships and handily wins from a price to performance ratio.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/13/2016
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi may be better known for its budget smartphones, but with the Mi 5 it has shown that it is more than capable of building a competent premium device as well. Although a lot of people will have problems with the price and the general idea that Xiaomi is even trying to build something premium, we feel that it's time to move on and give the company the respect it deserves. The Mi 5 is a solid effort that succeeds in giving you a flagship smartphone experience at a price that we consider excellent for a phone of this quality.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 100% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi made it easy for us. The Mi 5 is one of the most beautiful, most powerful, and most capable smartphones to date and there is little to dwell on it. If the Mi 5 is available in your geographic region, our recommendation is to grab one right away.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 100% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70% emissions: 80%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 is a flagship class smartphone, at a mid-ranged price. The Snapdragon 820 makes it one of the most powerful smartphones in India at the moment, and even after being downclocked, it can go toe-to-toe with a Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge. The camera is disappointing, but at Rs. 24,999, there's no denying the value.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi made it easy for us. The Mi 5 is one of the most beautiful, most powerful, and most capable smartphones to date and there is little to dwell on it. If the Mi 5 is available in your geographic region, our recommendation is to grab one right away. Xiaomi is not ready to offer waterproofing just yet, but we can forgive its omission by being dazzled by the looks and thin profile. The lightweight glass body and sturdy metal frame, both thoughtfully crafted, may have had suffered from water-proofing anyway.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 features a new 5.15" IPS display of 1080p resolution. Even though most of the rumors suggested an upgrade to 2K resolution, Xiaomi chose to keep the Full HD screen, and we don't mind that. A pixel density of 428ppi is more than respectable and leaves the Snapdragon 820 chip with power to spare on tasks and productivity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/24/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/25/2016
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 93%
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/03/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 7/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/15/2016
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 96%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 92% display: 92% mobility: 85%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/29/2016
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Sin Celular ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/20/2016
Source: Teknofilo ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/20/2016
Source: Tecno User IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% performance: 90% features: 90% display: 85% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Meilleurmobile FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 80% features: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 50%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 100%
Source: Spiders Web PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/05/2016
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/17/2016
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 9% price: 90% performance: 90%
Source: Teknokulis TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% features: 88% workmanship: 85%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/08/2016
Xiaomi Mi Max 6.4 inch
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi Max 6.4 inchProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
Graphics Adapter: unknown
Display: 6.40 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.203kg
Price: 400 euro
Links: Mi Max 6.4 inch (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Design wise Xiaomi Mi Max is brilliant and big screen device lovers will definitely love this handset . It has 32GB ROM and 3GB RAM furthermore with 16 MP rear camera and 5MP back camera. All these specifications are directly for those people who wants a slim and stylish phone with full entertainment package. The device has great camera results and fast processor so you should consider this device before buying any other device.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 90% performance: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: T Break EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Simply put, the Mi Max is a great phablet device, especially when you look at the pricing which is just AED 899. Xiaomi has cut corners in some places such as design and build quality, but makes up for it with its performance and battery life. So, if you are on the lookout for a cheap phablet, but are willing to look over some minor flaws, then the Xiaomi Mi Max is a good choice.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 85% performance: 80% workmanship: 65%
Source: Fudzilla EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Max is a weird device. It sits halfway between Redmi and Mi series products, but in most respects, it’s closer to Redmi devices in terms of overall performance and build quality. This is reflected in the price as well, so you can pick up an entry-level Mi Max for about $170, which is quite nice.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/05/2016
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
You never feel like you’ve been short changed in any area, with a Full HD IPS display that’s vibrant enough for on-the-go movie watching, performance that lets Android tick along nicely, and a design that doesn’t feel too cheap either. There are even some clever software tweaks going on behind the scenes, something we hope Xiaomi brings back for its top-end phones. Sure, it’s plastic fantastic when you get close, and it doesn’t have the best camera, but if all you care about is a massive display, the Mi Max has got you covered.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Now for how much all this will cost. Xiaomi has fitted the Mi Max with a R4 700 price tag. As such, for the outlay of a mid-range device, users will be getting something close to a flagship phablet range, minus a few frills of course. In terms of value for money and sheer inches then, the Mi Max is a standout. That said, the 6.44" frame is not for everyone and only those that will be consuming a lot of content, as well as doing a fair bit of multitasking will get the most out of the Mi Max.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Review Zat EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/20/2016
Source: Htxt Africa EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you can look beyond the huge dimensions of the Mi Max you'll discover a great smartphone with enough performance to keep you moving at a comfortable pace. It also helps that the battery will last four days on the trot. It's great, but only if you can handle a big chunk of aluminium.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I have to admit that Xiaomi Mi Max look much better from Cubot Max. But if we take under consideration that the Cubot has a better camera from Mi Max, the battery is removable and for only 114.99€, you get a very good and big mobile, I would toss it easily. On the other hand, Mi Max comes for 195.99€, almost twice the price from Cubot, but with better characteristics. So if you are looking for a good, big mobile, Cubot Max is your choice. If you can afford more money, then you should look at Mi Max.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 10/11/2016
Source: Techspot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Using the Xiaomi Mi Max for a couple of weeks was an enlightening experience. The phone is enormous, but there’s no doubting the quality of the hardware Xiaomi has managed to include at an affordable price point. Most of the issues I had with the Mi Max relate to its size. At 6.44-inches, there is simply no comfortable way to hold and operate this smartphone in one hand, at least without resorting to constantly using the one-handed software mode. Restricted to two-handed use in the majority of circumstances, the Mi Max quickly became cumbersome, particularly when I wanted to hold another object while operating this device.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Techy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Max bridges the gap between a tablet and a large smartphone by bringing you the best of both worlds. While this phone is not meant for everyone, it is a definite choice for someone in search of a compact tablet. I am one of those and absolutely enjoyed my time with the MI Max. And before you ask – Yes, it does fit in a jeans pocket and it will restrict certain movements, but when out of pocket, be prepared for some massive fun.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/17/2016
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the Xiaomi Mi Max is one of the very few in its segment, the trend of smartphones with display sizes bigger than 6 inches and less than 7 inches is expected to rise in the next few months. Xiaomi seems to have hit the centre point between offering the immersive experience of tablets with the design and features of a smartphone. While the handset is definitely big, the experience while gaming or watching videos or consuming other media is definitely noteworthy. Added to that, the performance and long-lasting battery life make it just perfect.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/28/2016
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Max has few competitors in the ‘Max’ category. As we have mentioned in past reviews, it’s not just the battery life that matters but the overall package and Xiaomi seems to have built a solid smartphone with a solid battery life. We were not fans of the software but the camera won us over and the same goes for the overall package.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 75% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It's safe to say that the Mi Max is yet another solid offering from Xiaomi, only this time, it's targeted at a rather niche market. There could be some demand for phones with enormous displays, and now buyers have a decent option. The Mi Max could potentially inject new life into this segment as it's a very good all-rounder. Its size is a subjective matter, as many people don't make a lot of voice calls, but do like watching movies and reading books. A device such as this could eliminate the need to use a separate phone and tablet, at home and also while traveling or commuting.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you want a huge phone and you don’t want to pay as large a wedge of cash, the Xiaomi Mi Max is a fantastic phablet with good looks, decent performance, strong runtime and, most importantly of all, a gigantic screen. Not ideal for novice users, but otherwise the Mi Max is a highly recommended smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% features: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Max certainly feels like a first attempt at what is largely unchartered territory for Xiaomi. While it has undercut the competition in price, it has also cut corners in many areas: the device's cheap build quality, poor imported device software experience, and lack U.S. availability are clearly disappointing attributes. But no smartphone is perfect, and the Mi Max has plenty to offer for the price. Its impressive camera, excellent battery life, and smooth performance are all great reasons to buy this phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 85% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We live in the digital renaissance where everything can be found online, but our windows to it are tiny - as tiny as the screens of the phones we're holding. There are people in developing markets whose only computer is their phone. From this perspective, you can clearly see there is a market niche for big screen phones. The nice is not necessarily a big one but it's big enough to fit these large-screen monsters.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/06/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There are few direct competitors to the Mi Max, for handsets with screens this big are rare and you're more likely to settle for a 6-inch or 7-inch device if you are looking for an alternative. And then, there's the price. In China, India and neighboring countries, the phablet starts from $230, which is a very good price. But the rest of the world will have to deal with markups, shipping, and import costs that could push the device between $300 to $400.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Pit - Heft 7/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/01/2018
Source: Andro Asia ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2016
Rating: mobility: 95% workmanship: 85%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/03/2016
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/19/2016
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tecnoandroid.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 87% display: 90% mobility: 95% workmanship: 85%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/20/2016
Source: Mobileimho.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/05/2016
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 70%
Source: Fony.sk SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/24/2016
Source: Reviewzat →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/31/2016
Xiaomi Mi5s
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi5sProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Display: 5.15 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.145kg
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As the Mi 5s has been in the market for a few months now, it has picked up a price cut that brings the cost of the phone down to under $300. As you can't buy it directly from Xiaomi, you'll have to rely on resellers. GearBest is selling it for $289 after entering code Mi5GSB. If you're in a market where LTE connectivity is available, the Mi 5s is a no-brainer for the cost.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Source: Fudzilla EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi5s is an evolution of the Mi5, and it’s better than its predecessor in almost every respect. However, it’s not that much better, because it’s almost the same phone, updated with a new SoC and camera module. In other words, nobody who owns a Mi5 or a different Snapdragon 820 device will be interested in the Mi5s.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2017
Source: Mobile Choice EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi's revised Mi 5 adds in some key areas, like camera quality, while leaving us wanting more in others. Built quality is suspect, and that much-hyped fingerprint scanner truly is one of the worst we've used - it only worked about 60% of the time.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 100% mobility: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We cannot recommend the Xiaomi Mi5s enough. This is the smartphone every 2016 flagship wanted to be, and it comes with a price tag half that of theirs. Fantastic build quality, fantastic performance, fantastic storage, battery and connectivity options - the Xiaomi Mi5s gets a big thumbs-up from us.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 90%
Source: Androidbeat EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi 5s is the perfect ‘s’ upgrade to the Mi 5. It improves in all key areas — build quality, camera, and performance — to deliver a vastly improved experience than its predecessor. Ideally, the Mi 5s is what the Mi 5 should have originally been. Nonetheless, if you have been holding out on buying the Mi 5 for some reason, go ahead and just buy the Mi 5s. It can hold its own against many other newer flagships and is a great phone for the price it commands. It truly is a shame that Xiaomi will not be bringing the Mi 5s to India where it could have been a formidable competitor to the likes of OnePlus 3 and Moto Z Play.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi 5s is a great flagship with excellent build quality, performance, battery life, and imaging skills. It makes a few notable upgrades over the Mi 5 predecessor - a metal unibody, a bigger battery, a more power-efficient chipset, and a capable main camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nubia Z11 Mini S and Xiaomi MI5S can have nice similarity in camera, design, and battery, but in terms of hardware, Xiaomi MI5S can win over Nubia Z11 Mini not only in terms of antutu. But considering the price, Nubia Z11 Mini S RAM 4GB ROM 64GB version sells at 1499 yuan, $250, RAM 4GB ROM 128GB black golden advanced version at 1899 yuan, $316, but Xiaomi MI5S RAM 3GB ROM 64GB at 1999 yuan, $330, and RAM 4GB ROM 128GB version at 2299 yuan, $383. Therefore, if you don’t pursue too high-end performance, Nubia Z11 Mini S is enough to use, but you are a game lover, we highly recommend choosing Xiaomi MI5S.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 10/19/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In all, Xiaomi MI5S can compare with Galaxy S7 with the good performance to prove Xiaomi has entered into the International market to compete with Samsung and Apple. Personally, we think we don’t have to spend much money on a smartphone.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/11/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Although Xiaomi MI5S and ZUK Z2 Pro has different processor, according to real test, they have no large gap in hardware, however, in design and camera, ZUK Z2 Pro can win over Xiaomi MI5S. Therefore, we still think ZUK Z2 Pro is more beautiful, especially back design. Just share more with us.
User Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/08/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
According to teardown, Xiaomi MI5S internal design has nice layout, the back metal cover has used Injection molding with exquisite processing for better cooling, such as the graphite stickers, in order to keep the phone’s thickness, it uses shield to ditch the OIS and Infrared function. The overall tear down is not so difficult, but about the maintenance, if the ultrasonic fingerprint scanner is broken, it is a little difficult to repair or change.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/29/2016
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 94% features: 58% display: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 96% features: 93% display: 97% mobility: 98%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 93% display: 92% mobility: 88%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: Andro Asia ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 95% display: 90% mobility: 85%
Source: Profesional Review ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Profesional Review ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: El Sabio Informatico ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/10/2016
Source: El Confidencial ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/19/2016
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/09/2016
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 95%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/19/2016
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/10/2016
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% display: 84% mobility: 84% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% display: 84% mobility: 84% workmanship: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% features: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% features: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% features: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 90% features: 93% display: 93% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 86%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2016
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/29/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2017
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 100% mobility: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/19/2016
Source: Clubic FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% mobility: 100% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: One Tech PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2017
Source: Spiders Web PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 100% display: 88% mobility: 78%
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2016
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Portal SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% display: 80% workmanship: 80%
Xiaomi Mi 5S Plus
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi 5S PlusProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 821
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Display: 5.70 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.168kg
Price: 400 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
One of the Xiaomi Mi 5SPlus’s main weaknesses for video is the lack of effective stabilization, which makes smooth videos a challenge; we recommend some phone support for improved results. Video autofocus is fast and accurate, however, with no performance issues shooting video in bright light. This said, some noticeable steps in focus, together with an increase in instability and slow convergence (including unnecessary refocusing during panning), result in more focus failures shooting video under changing lighting conditions. Some visible ringing, aliasing, and blocking artifacts are also visible in videos shot under all lighting conditions.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi5S Plus is a really amazing mobile. Very fast, very strong, elegant, light at the hand, you are going to fall in love with it! You can find it at Coolicool the 6/128GB version for $509.99 or $429.99 the 4/64GB version. Do you have one to? Write me down your impressions about it! What ROM you have and can you beat this score with your ROM? I want to hear news from you.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi 5s Plus is also the fastest Android smartphone today, with great screen and battery life. MIUI8 is a nice launcher, too. Unless you are after the whole Leica experience from Huawei or the water-proof body from Sony or Samsung, you would probably find the Mi 5s Plus to be an excellent deal that's really tempting.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/02/2016
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The handset has a solid build quality although personally, I’m not a fan of its gold color. We’re also not complaining that it only has a Full HD resolution as battery life greatly benefitted from it. We’re also fans of the dual camera setup ala Huawei P9 and its Monochrome mode that shoots sharp photos with great contrast.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: University Herald EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus is specced slightly higher than the Mi 5 but is it really match to Google Pixel XL performance? Find out here!
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/31/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The main difference between Xiaomi MI5S Plus and Huawei P9 Plus is in their hardware, due to Snapdragon 821 processor, it makes Xiaomi MI5S enjoy higher performance than Huawei P9 Plus, but Huawei P9 Plus still performs nice in dual camera. If you are looking for a cheaper but higher performance smartphone, Xiaomi MI5S Plus can be your first choice, but if you are more into better quality, Huawei P9 Plus will not let you down.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 10/07/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
According to comparison between Xiaomi MI5S Plus and Asus Zenfone 3 Deluxe., we know Asus Zenfone 3 Deluxe has some advantages in design, craftsmanship, performance and camera, but Xiaomi MI5S Plus also has its own merits such as battery and price. If you are looking for a cheaper RAM 6GB Snapdragon 821 smartphone, Xiaomi MI5S Plus is a good choice, if you don’t mind the price, of course, you can try Asus Zenfone 3 Deluxe first.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi MI5S Plus in terms of its design looks a little like Redmi Pro, but according to the hardware, it can be called the flagship right now in MI series. If we enjoy larger screen, better camera, why not have a try this Xiaomi MI5S Plus? Welcome to share more with us.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/29/2016
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/04/2016
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 100% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/22/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 94% display: 84% mobility: 87%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75%
Source: Sin Celular ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/20/2016
Source: Canaltech PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/23/2017
Source: Canaltech PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/23/2017
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/17/2017
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100%
Source: Canaltech PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: Tecnoandroid.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/11/2016
Rating: performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 100% display: 90% mobility: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/29/2016
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 88% workmanship: 84%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 85% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 80%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 100% mobility: 80%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Xiaomi Mi Max Prime
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi Max PrimeProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 510
Display: 6.44 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.203kg
Links:
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/10/2016
Xiaomi Mi Note 2
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi Note 2Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 821
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Display: 5.70 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.166kg
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Note 2 was wrongly overshadowed at its launch. This is a gorgeous big-screen Android phone with very decent performance, a great camera and plenty of storage. We'd like to see a Quad-HD screen on Xiaomi's flagship phone, but this one should prove plenty sharp and clear. Google apps are not preinstalled, but there is a workaround if you are happy to do some tweaking.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Note 2 was wrongly overshadowed at its launch. This is a gorgeous big-screen Android phone with very decent performance, a great camera and plenty of storage. We'd like to see a Quad-HD screen on Xiaomi's flagship phone, but this one should prove plenty sharp and clear. Google apps are not preinstalled, but there is a workaround if you are happy to do some tweaking.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Once you get to know the device inside and out, you’ll soon realize that the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 offers an experience that is quite compelling in both hardware and software, and instead of just being a clone, is instead a worthy alternative to the Galaxy Note 7.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 95% workmanship: 85%
Source: Slashgear EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If we were getting this device for the price it goes for in China, converted directly to USD, it’d be a real deal. As it stands, we still need to go through 3rd-party retailers to get the device. I mean the standard 128GB version in China, which can be found for around RMB 3299 which is around $480 USD, compared to the version we have. We have the version called Mi Note 2 Global.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fudzilla EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 is not a Samsung Note 7 rip-off, but even if it was, the Note 7 is dead anyway. The Note 2 is not original either. It’s not a cheap phone, but it’s still somewhat cheaper than similar devices from mainstream brands. It’s might not be as big as you’d expect from a 5.7-inch beast, yet it doesn’t exactly have a small footprint (Samsung still beats it on account of its smaller bezels, made possibly by the curvier AMOLED display). That’s sort of our problem with the Mi Note 2. It feels like it was designed by a committee.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We approached the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 review with high expectations. The vacant spot left by Samsung's phablet this fall season was prime for the taking and we really wanted to see the Mi Note 2 as a product that's as at least as much disruptive as its pedigree suggests.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/09/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Note 2 was wrongly overshadowed at its launch. This is a gorgeous big-screen Android phone with very decent performance, a great camera and plenty of storage. We'd like to see a Quad-HD screen on Xiaomi's flagship phone, but this one should prove plenty sharp and clear. Google apps are not preinstalled, but there is a workaround if you are happy to do some tweaking.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90%
Source: Manila Shaker EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi MI Note 2 is expected at P28,990 $580 for the version with 4GB RAM and 64GB storage while higher specced version will land at about P34,990 or $700 6GB/128GB variant.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Forbes EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Is the Mi Note 2 going to win acclaim this year? Probably not. The unveiling of the Mi Mix all but guaranteed that it’ll be taking a backseat. But priced at just $413 ($2800 rmb) and $488 (3300 rmb), this is — like most Xiaomi phones — one of the best value smartphone on the market. You’re getting a Snapdragon 821 device, with 4/6GB of RAM and a great build for half the price of the Google Pixel.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/05/2016
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The original Mi Note was well-spec’ed and launched with a lot of fanfare, but for whatever reason - maybe it’s the price, maybe it’s just the wrong timing - it didn’t help Xiaomi crack the premium smartphone segment. As Samsung stumbles, there’s now a sliver of opening here, a great chance that I’m sure the Chinese and Taiwanese companies would not let slip. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2, packed with all the technical and practical wizardry CEO Lei Jun and his team could muster, couldn’t have arrived at a better time. Well, at least for the good folks in China.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/30/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In conclusion, Xiaomi mi note 2 keeps the good level in its inner design and craftsmanship, although there is no big innovation, it’s good for maintenance. The most improvement of Xiaomi mi note 2 is to use dual curved screen. So are you ready to catch one?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi MI Note 2 uses dual curved 3D glass with great holding grip. We can confirm Xiaomi MI Note 2 is the most beautiful smartphone until now. It’s 5.7inch screen with ultra narrow frame which makes us fall in love with it deeply. So we are quite satisfied with the design, as for hardware, Xiaomi mi note 2 doesn’t let us down, Snapdragon 821 processor, RAM 4GB ROM 64GB, RAM 6GB ROM 128GB, two versions, and 8MP front camera and 23MP back camera. Most importantly, it sells at the most competitive price right now. So are you ready to get one?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Gear Open EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Concerning the packaging, we witness the new trend with the box. Instead of mimicking Apple’s iPhone box, Xiaomi came up with their idea which seems to be perfection. Xiaomi has decided to walk with simplicity and elegance as the package appears to be plain white with an engraved Mi Logo at the center. We observe no diagram of Xiaomi Mi Note 2 at all.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It was a very well-documented fact that Xiaomi’s new Mi Note 2 would be a device that had a dual-curve display. Previously a feature unique only to Samsung devices, Xiaomi and others are now jumping on the bandwagon.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While there's a version of the Mi Note 2 that will have LTE support for the US and lots of other countries, the bad news is that the phone will be China-only, and Xiaomi has no plans to sell this elsewhere, even in places like Singapore or Hong Kong. It's a surprising move, but perhaps Xiaomi is looking inwards to its homeground as it aims to regain market share, having slipped to fourth position as rivals Oppo and Vivo have surged ahead.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/08/2017
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2016
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/27/2016
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 96% features: 90% display: 89% mobility: 91%
Source: Golem DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/16/2016
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/14/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/23/2016
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 92% display: 91% mobility: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 100% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: ZDNet DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Profesional Review ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 90% performance: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: El Confidencial ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: El Confidencial ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 87%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/10/2016
Source: Key for web IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% display: 80% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 50%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 70% features: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 87% ergonomy: 87%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2016
Rating: performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/29/2016
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/28/2016
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 72% mobility: 85% workmanship: 89%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 85% features: 98% display: 65% mobility: 89% ergonomy: 82%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/12/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% features: 90% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/21/2016
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/09/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/21/2016
Source: Android Portal SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi MixProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 821
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Display: 6.40 inch, 17:9, 2040 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.209kg
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
屏幕即是一切,一切都是屏幕。 小米的新旗舰平板手机在一个不会比传统的高端手机大多少的外壳中装进了一个巨大的6.4英寸的屏幕。考虑到700欧元(约合737美元)左右的起步价,它并不便宜。那么进口一台这样富有创新的设备是否值得呢?
Foreign Reviews
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This is a really great display overall. The only area where the MIX falls a little short is white balance, which is a little cool by default. It’s not nearly as bad as what we’ve seen on other Chinese phones, though, and it probably will not bother most people. Xiaomi provides the Cool and Warm color modes to shift the white point, but it would be nice to see finer grained controls.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/10/2017
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This is a really great display overall. The only area where the MIX falls a little short is white balance, which is a little cool by default. It’s not nearly as bad as what we’ve seen on other Chinese phones, though, and it probably will not bother most people. Xiaomi provides the Cool and Warm color modes to shift the white point, but it would be nice to see finer grained controls.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/10/2017
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix, for your reference, starts at RMB 3,499 (roughly Rs 34,500) for the base 4GB RAM and 128GB memory option while the top-tier 6GB RAM and 256GB storage option is available for RMB 3,999 (approx Rs 39,500) in China.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix, for your reference, starts at RMB 3,499 (roughly Rs 34,500) for the base 4GB RAM and 128GB memory option while the top-tier 6GB RAM and 256GB storage option is available for RMB 3,999 (approx Rs 39,500) in China.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It might sound expensive, but the £799 Xiaomi Mi Mix actually offers very good value when you consider its meaty core hardware and generous 256GB of storage - it's certainly less than you'd pay for an iPhone 7 Plus. This isn't a phone you buy with budget in mind, however: the Mi Mix is the phone you buy when you want onlookers to say "Oh my gosh, what is that? It's amazing - I want one of those!" The Mi Mix is a revolutionary phone that we hope is a sign of things to come, with that gorgeous bezel-less display, beautiful ceramic body, fantastic performance, long, long battery life and all the other fancy tech we can't even pronounce, let alone understand. No matter - it works. Highly recommended.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It might sound expensive, but the £799 Xiaomi Mi Mix actually offers very good value when you consider its meaty core hardware and generous 256GB of storage - it's certainly less than you'd pay for an iPhone 7 Plus. This isn't a phone you buy with budget in mind, however: the Mi Mix is the phone you buy when you want onlookers to say "Oh my gosh, what is that? It's amazing - I want one of those!" The Mi Mix is a revolutionary phone that we hope is a sign of things to come, with that gorgeous bezel-less display, beautiful ceramic body, fantastic performance, long, long battery life and all the other fancy tech we can't even pronounce, let alone understand. No matter - it works. Highly recommended.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It might sound expensive, but the £799 Xiaomi Mi Mix actually offers very good value when you consider its meaty core hardware and generous 256GB of storage - it's certainly less than you'd pay for an iPhone 7 Plus. This isn't a phone you buy with budget in mind, however: the Mi Mix is the phone you buy when you want onlookers to say "Oh my gosh, what is that? It's amazing - I want one of those!" The Mi Mix is a revolutionary phone that we hope is a sign of things to come, with that gorgeous bezel-less display, beautiful ceramic body, fantastic performance, long, long battery life and all the other fancy tech we can't even pronounce, let alone understand. No matter - it works. Highly recommended.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It might sound expensive, but the £799 Xiaomi Mi Mix actually offers very good value when you consider its meaty core hardware and generous 256GB of storage - it's certainly less than you'd pay for an iPhone 7 Plus. This isn't a phone you buy with budget in mind, however: the Mi Mix is the phone you buy when you want onlookers to say "Oh my gosh, what is that? It's amazing - I want one of those!" The Mi Mix is a revolutionary phone that we hope is a sign of things to come, with that gorgeous bezel-less display, beautiful ceramic body, fantastic performance, long, long battery life and all the other fancy tech we can't even pronounce, let alone understand. No matter - it works. Highly recommended.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s a lot to like about the Mi Mix - but it isn’t faultless. Beyond that stunner of a screen, its resolution could stand to be be higher, and camera quality is only average.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s a lot to like about the Mi Mix - but it isn’t faultless. Beyond that stunner of a screen, its resolution could stand to be be higher, and camera quality is only average.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It might sound expensive, but the £799 Xiaomi Mi Mix actually offers very good value when you consider its meaty core hardware and generous 256GB of storage - it's certainly less than you'd pay for an iPhone 7 Plus. This isn't a phone you buy with budget in mind, however: the Mi Mix is the phone you buy when you want onlookers to say "Oh my gosh, what is that? It's amazing - I want one of those!" The Mi Mix is a revolutionary phone that we hope is a sign of things to come, with that gorgeous bezel-less display, beautiful ceramic body, fantastic performance, long, long battery life and all the other fancy tech we can't even pronounce, let alone understand. No matter - it works. Highly recommended.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It might sound expensive, but the £799 Xiaomi Mi Mix actually offers very good value when you consider its meaty core hardware and generous 256GB of storage - it's certainly less than you'd pay for an iPhone 7 Plus. This isn't a phone you buy with budget in mind, however: the Mi Mix is the phone you buy when you want onlookers to say "Oh my gosh, what is that? It's amazing - I want one of those!" The Mi Mix is a revolutionary phone that we hope is a sign of things to come, with that gorgeous bezel-less display, beautiful ceramic body, fantastic performance, long, long battery life and all the other fancy tech we can't even pronounce, let alone understand. No matter - it works. Highly recommended.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90%
Source: Androidbeat EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix is gorgeous to look at and, once configured, superb to use, with high spec components throughout, camera permitting (for space reasons). As Unique Selling Points go, having almost zero bezels on three sides comes pretty high on the list and I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see more and more smartphones come with similar designs in 2017. Imagine a phone with a 5.5” display in the body of what normally houses a 5” screen. Oh wait, such a Mi Mix ‘nano’ is already rumoured from Xiaomi – but they won’t be alone here. All I’m asking, aside from a properly thought out ‘world edition’ in terms of updates, bands and regions, is that the polished ceramic finish be dialled down somehow – smartphones don’t need to also be works of art!
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/29/2016
Source: Androidbeat EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix is gorgeous to look at and, once configured, superb to use, with high spec components throughout, camera permitting (for space reasons). As Unique Selling Points go, having almost zero bezels on three sides comes pretty high on the list and I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see more and more smartphones come with similar designs in 2017. Imagine a phone with a 5.5” display in the body of what normally houses a 5” screen. Oh wait, such a Mi Mix ‘nano’ is already rumoured from Xiaomi – but they won’t be alone here. All I’m asking, aside from a properly thought out ‘world edition’ in terms of updates, bands and regions, is that the polished ceramic finish be dialled down somehow – smartphones don’t need to also be works of art!
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/29/2016
Source: Mobile and Apps EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi has launched this amazing piece for mass market as compared to other edgeless screen phones, which are available in extremely limited numbers (and places).
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/09/2016
Source: Mobile and Apps EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi has launched this amazing piece for mass market as compared to other edgeless screen phones, which are available in extremely limited numbers (and places).
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/09/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi was brave enough to go for something rather new, instead of pushing the limits of performance, screen resolution, camera skills, or battery endurance. Design is where Xiaomi desired to make a difference and an edge-to-edge screen is a game-changer in this department.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi was brave enough to go for something rather new, instead of pushing the limits of performance, screen resolution, camera skills, or battery endurance. Design is where Xiaomi desired to make a difference and an edge-to-edge screen is a game-changer in this department.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2016
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix is a glimpse of the all-screen future of phones. But Xiaomi needs to improve on basics like the camera and find a way to make more of these before we can wholeheartedly recommend it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix is a glimpse of the all-screen future of phones. But Xiaomi needs to improve on basics like the camera and find a way to make more of these before we can wholeheartedly recommend it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Chinese users will get a big kick out of using this phone on the daily, especially those that consume and stream media a lot (a highly common occurrence in the East). And for a concept phone, it is surprisingly affordable – the RMB price roughly converts to just over $500 in the base model. This is mostly due to the small quantities that Xiaomi is actually manufacturing – they want to get the phone in as many hands as possible without creating so many that the price needs be higher to cover those costs.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 85% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Chinese users will get a big kick out of using this phone on the daily, especially those that consume and stream media a lot (a highly common occurrence in the East). And for a concept phone, it is surprisingly affordable – the RMB price roughly converts to just over $500 in the base model. This is mostly due to the small quantities that Xiaomi is actually manufacturing – they want to get the phone in as many hands as possible without creating so many that the price needs be higher to cover those costs.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 85% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Forbes EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So in all, Xiaomi’s Mi Mix is not a phone without flaws. But if you want the latest, coolest tech that will catch other people’s eye, the Mi Mix is it. There’s no other phone on the market like it, and it makes the the iPhone and Pixel look outdated. Tech geeks are always complaining that smartphone designs have become boring. Well, this is anything but.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2016
Source: Forbes EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So in all, Xiaomi’s Mi Mix is not a phone without flaws. But if you want the latest, coolest tech that will catch other people’s eye, the Mi Mix is it. There’s no other phone on the market like it, and it makes the the iPhone and Pixel look outdated. Tech geeks are always complaining that smartphone designs have become boring. Well, this is anything but.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2016
Source: Mashable EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The beautiful, innovative design of the Xiaomi Mi Mix has its compromises, but you'll happily deal with them to hold a phone from the future.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2016
Source: Mashable EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The beautiful, innovative design of the Xiaomi Mi Mix has its compromises, but you'll happily deal with them to hold a phone from the future.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi can make some truly remarkable devices; the Mi Mix is really a testament to that. However, I still think the company can still work on its software: MIUI 8 still doesn’t feel quite as polished and refined as other versions of Android.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/05/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi can make some truly remarkable devices; the Mi Mix is really a testament to that. However, I still think the company can still work on its software: MIUI 8 still doesn’t feel quite as polished and refined as other versions of Android.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/05/2016
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix costs a mere 3499 Yuan, which translates to about Rs. 35,000. So, it’s essentially a phone that feels more premium than a Google Pixel XL, is just as fast, but is priced nearer to the OnePlus 3. While it isn’t comparable to the best flagships in all aspects, it’s a glimpse at where the competition is going to be in future.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix costs a mere 3499 Yuan, which translates to about Rs. 35,000. So, it’s essentially a phone that feels more premium than a Google Pixel XL, is just as fast, but is priced nearer to the OnePlus 3. While it isn’t comparable to the best flagships in all aspects, it’s a glimpse at where the competition is going to be in future.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Soycincau EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
You won’t get very good mileage with a V12 Lambo. Nor will you be able to park it, or see out the back of it, or drive it in narrow town streets. Plus, it might catch fire in a traffic jam. But you’ll love a big V12 Lambo and I think love is the best way to describe my feelings towards the Mi MIX.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/31/2016
Source: Soycincau EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
You won’t get very good mileage with a V12 Lambo. Nor will you be able to park it, or see out the back of it, or drive it in narrow town streets. Plus, it might catch fire in a traffic jam. But you’ll love a big V12 Lambo and I think love is the best way to describe my feelings towards the Mi MIX.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/31/2016
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So there you’ve it: the big surprise that is the Mi MIX. My hunch is that two things motivated Xiaomi into making this phone. One is to shake off its copycat reputation, which unfortunately has surfaced once again in some people’s minds because of the Mi Note 2. The other is a response to some critics (maybe even some of its most ardent fans) who observed that its recent phones all kind of look very similar to one another.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/30/2016
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So there you’ve it: the big surprise that is the Mi MIX. My hunch is that two things motivated Xiaomi into making this phone. One is to shake off its copycat reputation, which unfortunately has surfaced once again in some people’s minds because of the Mi Note 2. The other is a response to some critics (maybe even some of its most ardent fans) who observed that its recent phones all kind of look very similar to one another.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/30/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi MIX is the first smartphone to keep the balance between high-end specs but also design and price. More importantly, it only sells at 3499 yuan,$583 which makes us give them five start good comment. Although the stock is not stable, we think it will not stop our passion for grabbing one. Come on.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: Gear Open EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi MIX is the first smartphone to keep the balance between high-end specs but also design and price. More importantly, it only sells at 3499 yuan,$583 which makes us give them five start good comment. Although the stock is not stable, we think it will not stop our passion for grabbing one. Come on.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi MIX is the first smartphone to keep the balance between high-end specs but also design and price. More importantly, it only sells at 3499 yuan,$583 which makes us give them five start good comment. Although the stock is not stable, we think it will not stop our passion for grabbing one. Come on.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: Gear Open EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi MIX is the first smartphone to keep the balance between high-end specs but also design and price. More importantly, it only sells at 3499 yuan,$583 which makes us give them five start good comment. Although the stock is not stable, we think it will not stop our passion for grabbing one. Come on.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
That said, do not discount the fact that this will be a blueprint of sorts for smartphone designs of the future. There is a lot of tech that goes unnoticed underneath to make something like the Mi Mix a reality. And let’s also not forget that this is actually a working device that goes on sale in a week’s time; this phone is right up there with the best of today’s flagships with its hardware set.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Smartphone designs today are beginning to be very predictable. After all, how much different can your rectangular slab be? As it turns out, quite a bit still, as Xiaomi showed earlier with its “concept” phone, the Mi Mix.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
That said, do not discount the fact that this will be a blueprint of sorts for smartphone designs of the future. There is a lot of tech that goes unnoticed underneath to make something like the Mi Mix a reality. And let’s also not forget that this is actually a working device that goes on sale in a week’s time; this phone is right up there with the best of today’s flagships with its hardware set.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Smartphone designs today are beginning to be very predictable. After all, how much different can your rectangular slab be? As it turns out, quite a bit still, as Xiaomi showed earlier with its “concept” phone, the Mi Mix.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Android Police EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This Mi Mix is very interesting. It might be the first time we see both the ultrasonic proximity sensor and the piezoelectric acoustic technology in the same device, and the fact that they come in such a beautiful package make them even more intriguing. I hate large bezels just as much as the next guy/gal, but I'm not sure I'd like an almost bezel-less phone. Where would I rest my fingers? How would I hold it? How durable is the frame with such a large display when surviving a fall? And would I spend my time wiping the screen from fingerprints now that I have to put my grubby mitts on it to even hold the phone? Gah. Too many questions that I can't answer because this is only being released in China.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Android Police EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This Mi Mix is very interesting. It might be the first time we see both the ultrasonic proximity sensor and the piezoelectric acoustic technology in the same device, and the fact that they come in such a beautiful package make them even more intriguing. I hate large bezels just as much as the next guy/gal, but I'm not sure I'd like an almost bezel-less phone. Where would I rest my fingers? How would I hold it? How durable is the frame with such a large display when surviving a fall? And would I spend my time wiping the screen from fingerprints now that I have to put my grubby mitts on it to even hold the phone? Gah. Too many questions that I can't answer because this is only being released in China.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Futurezone.at DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: Futurezone.at DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: ZDNet DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: ZDNet DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/09/2017
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/09/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/06/2017
Rating: performance: 100% features: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/06/2017
Rating: performance: 100% features: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/11/2016
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/11/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/08/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/08/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 92% display: 84% mobility: 84%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 92% display: 84% mobility: 84%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/25/2016
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/25/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: ZDNet DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: ZDNet DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 95% display: 90% mobility: 95% workmanship: 95%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 95% display: 90% mobility: 95% workmanship: 95%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: El chapuzas Informatico ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2016
Source: El chapuzas Informatico ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2016
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 60% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 60% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: El Confidencial ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/19/2016
Source: El Confidencial ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/19/2016
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 90% display: 100% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 90% display: 100% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tutto App Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/13/2017
Source: Tutto App Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/13/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% features: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 85%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% features: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 85%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 60% display: 100% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 40%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 60% display: 100% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 40%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/16/2016
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/16/2016
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/07/2016
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/07/2016
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/05/2016
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/05/2016
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/23/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/23/2016
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 75% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/23/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/23/2016
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 75% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 80% features: 89% display: 98% mobility: 92% ergonomy: 60%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 80% features: 89% display: 98% mobility: 92% ergonomy: 60%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/13/2016
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/13/2016
Source: Bright.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/21/2016
Source: Bright.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/21/2016
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2017
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2017
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 100% mobility: 90%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 100% mobility: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/14/2016
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/14/2016
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/09/2017
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/09/2017
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobileimho.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: Mobileimho.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/17/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/17/2017
Source: Mobile Review RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Mobile Review RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/13/2016
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/13/2016
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/30/2016
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/30/2016
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/21/2016
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/21/2016
Source: Sohoa VN Express VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Sohoa VN Express VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/15/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/15/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/09/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/09/2016
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Android Portal SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Android Portal SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi 5sProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 821
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Display: 5.15 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.145kg
Links:
Price comparison
Reviews
它很特别? 去年,小米Mi 5智能手机非凡的性价比而给我们留下了深刻印象。这次,我们将看看续作Mi 5s,它带有更多存储、坚固的金属外壳和更好的功能。它拥有时下最快的处理器:骁龙SoC。
Xiaomi Mi 5c
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi 5cProcessor: unknown
Graphics Adapter: unknown
Display: 5.15 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.135kg
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It’s the first time that Xiaomi enters into its own processor field. We can see Xiaomi has done well on its first own processor smartphone, Xiaomi MI5C. We can feel that Xiaomi MI5C is the successor of Xiaomi mi4c. This light and thin smartphone can be popular with different kinds of people. If you like 5 inch smartphone, you can consider this one.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 70% display: 100% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2018
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/30/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 73%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 80% display: 78% mobility: 54%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/01/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/04/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Xiaomi Mi6
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi6Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 835
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 540
Display: 5.15 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.168kg
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Even with the cons, the pros are stacked with the price point leading the way. It might not be perfect as a flagship, but if you can get your hands on it, this amalgam of features could be one of the best bang for buck phones in existence.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 85% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This really is an amazing phone, and only the Chinese software puts us off recommending it for a UK audience. It is crazy fast, crazy beautiful and crazy priced. If you know your way around Android go and get one, and you won’t be disappointed.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi tried to put everything that's hot right now in a low-fare package and the resulting Mi 6 is an amazing phone for the price. Xiaomi's keen on making a statement with it and challenging the big names in the game. The way the Chinese go about it is probably not the most subtle but in terms of looks and specs, the Xiaomi Mi 6 is the best Mi yet.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/26/2017
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you’ve been searching for a smartphone with Snapdragon 835 that doesn’t break the bank, all you have to search for is Xiaomi. The Chinese tech company has been giving us the best specifications and performance for a certain price point like its latest flagship — the Mi 6. Launched just last month, the handset has 2017 flagship features you’d expect but not as expensive as the others. Here’s our review.
video review
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/26/2017
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi is yet to announce India launch plans for the Mi 6, though a representative told Gadgets 360 that there's no truth to rumours claiming that the phone won't launch here at all. We can expect the Mi 6 to be priced at around the same aggressive level as it is priced in China, in order to take on the popular OnePlus 3T.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
My first impressions put the Mi 6 in a pretty positive spot, as Xiaomi attempts to make their flagship the place to find the best specs and features in one place. We will continue our testing over the next week or so before we give you our full review.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi MI6 is quite amazing in terms of design, its hardware is quite powerful, until now, no Chinese smartphone can beat it. As for camera, its performance can compete with that of Huawei P10 or Huawei Mate 9. But the most competitive factor is the price, Xiaomi MI6 only sells at least, 2,499 yuan, $400. By the way, you can use coupon code: GB9% to save money.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2017
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A premium ceramic version with 6GB RAM and 128GB onboard storage will retail for just a little more at 2,999 Chinese yuan (that's $435, £340 or AU$580). If you want to get one in the US, UK or Australia, you'll have to go through online third-party retailers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/19/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Golem DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/01/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 95% display: 88% mobility: 91%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/13/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 95% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/18/2017
Source: El Confidencial ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2017
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 70% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Sin Celular ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: El Sabio Informatico ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/11/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/30/2017
Source: El Confidencial ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2017
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/10/2017
Source: Wiz Blog IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/05/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% features: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/24/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 75% features: 85% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Tutto App Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 90% features: 98% display: 90% mobility: 86% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% mobility: 75% workmanship: 82%
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/20/2017
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/18/2017
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mobile Review RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/14/2017
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 90% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/24/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: KinaTech HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/19/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Source: Yeu Laptop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/01/2017
Source: TechZ VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/29/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/25/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/19/2017
Xiaomi Mi Max 2
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi Max 2Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 506
Display: 6.44 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.211kg
Price: 210 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
China import for phablet fans. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a screen size of over 6.4-inches - which you may or may not like. But if you do go for the XXL smartphone, you will find that it has quite a lot to offer for $370.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Manila Shaker EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For a phablet its size, the Mi Max 2 has potential. It doesn’t have other gimmicky options that make it stand out compared to other phablets, but it works in delivering what people want in a phone, and with a powerful processor and surprisingly smooth interface, Xiaomi’s phablet is pretty good for its price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/03/2017
Source: Tech2 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To put it in a nutshell, go for this device only if you have two major needs — long lasting battery and media consumption. The large battery and display are the unique selling points of this phone, as in every other department you can find better faring alternatives, some from Xiaomi itself. Also, the large size of the phone means that it is not suitable for use for everyone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75%
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is a bigger device compare to other devices so it is a little bit difficult and new thing to handle. It is a phablet size smart phone with good features. The users who like to have a big smart phone must go for Xiaomi Mi MAx 2.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s no doubt Mi Max 2 is a niche phone, which performs well and delivers on the core area of display, battery, and performance. Battery is one of its best features, and this could be the device that never dies. But unless you actively want a 6.4-inch phone to make your daily calls, you can look at other options in the market, including Redmi Note 4, Moto G5 Plus and others.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/22/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is certainly not everyone's cup of tea. Now, what we have here is more of a mug - if not the entire teapot - but you know what we mean. Stretching the limits of a smartphone screen is nothing new, but many have tried and failed to leave a meaningful mark in the 6-inch-and-above bracket. Sony's Ultra series are among the better examples and Huawei's had a few phablets right as well.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/18/2017
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Max 2, just like last year's Mi Max, is an all-rounder that pretty much checks in all the right boxes. But, at the end of the day, it's just another Redmi Note 4 clone -- in every sense of the word -- except that it has been made to order for people -- if any -- who like large-sized phablets. More or less, it shares all the plus and minus points of its younger (and more affordable) sibling. The Mi Max 2 is well-built, has a good display, is a slick and very capable performer, has excellent audio and a fantastic battery life. Is it any better than the Mi Max though? Well, only marginally. Which means, if you already happen to own a Mi Max, I would suggest you hold on to it for some more. If you don't however, and you're looking for a phone of such gigantic proportions, the Mi Max 2 is the only phone at its price point that -- as mentioned earlier -- checks in all the right boxes.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Max 2 is a nice, progressive iteration of the idea. The refined design and the incredible battery life make for a well-rounded package. The camera is not the best and the processing power isn’t top tier, yet at INR 16,999 ($270) in India, it is a great pick for anyone who wants a phone with a large display or wants a power bank with smartphone features thrown in.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 81% display: 82% mobility: 100% workmanship: 82%
Source: iTech Post EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The device also has some cons like it's not easy to pick up, and, without a stand, it's unwieldy to hold and watch videos one-handed. Still, with good processing speed, multitasking features, a bright enough display Xiaomi Mi Max 2 comes just for INR 16,999 ($270), which looks like a nice deal.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/07/2017
Source: Androidbeat EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the end though, for the price that Xiaomi commands for the Mi Max 2 — Rs 16,999, it is almost impossible to ignore just how much of a value for money the device offers, especially since you are getting 64GB of storage and 4GB of RAM for that price. If you want a device that bridges the gap between a phone and a tablet, go for the Mi Max 2 with your eyes closed — you will not regret your decision.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/02/2017
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Large smartphones aren’t meant for everyone. The problems with the phablets are, they aren’t easier to carry in the hands, they can’t be able to fit inside your small pockets, feels bulkier, and so on. That said, in a nutshell, if you love big screen smartphones, want excellent battery life, and have the ₹17,000 budget to spend, Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is worthy in our opinion. If you have a lesser budget, the first generation Mi Max is still the right pick.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/01/2017
Source: Gadgets Now EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is definitely a charmer in multiple ways. An impressive performance courtesy the processor and ample RAM, decent display and camera, all mashed in an elegant-looking shell is what an everyday user would want in the given price range of Rs 16,999. However, as the name clearly says, it is a 'Max' sized smartphone and definitely not meant for a single-handed use. It is for those media consuming lot who love to watch movies, TV series and play games on the move with a larger and more engaging experience.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, the smartphone is not just a regular phone you will in the market. It has a pretty large screen, which is ideal for media consumption but takes some time to get used to it. The phone comes with some impressive battery backup and the overall performance of the device is at par with the rest of the competition. So, if you fancy large screens and is looking to buy one, then Xiaomi Mi Max 2 can be considered as a good option.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/27/2017
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Max 2 is a unique device that is larger than most so-called phablets yet it is uniquely positioned to be much more portable than tablets. Given the success of the Mi Max, it is clear that a market most certainly exists that craves for a device that sits at the cross-section of these two categories. The Mi Max 2 takes everything good from the original and improves it further.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/27/2017
Source: Gogi.in EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Excellent smartphone or call it a phablet, its powerful, does not heat up, camera is excellent and so is the battery life. The only thing to consider is the size, since this is big and if you are comfortable using it then there is no better option in this phablet category. Those who are already using the Mi Max can upgrade if required.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The overall design is impressive while performance smooth. Battery performance left us pleasantly surprised. On the other hand, the camera could have used improvement. There haven't been many good launches in the Rs. 15,000-20,000 price band of late, so we would recommend the Mi Max 2 to anyone looking for a great display and battery performance in a smartphone in this segment, if they don't mind its size.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In a fiercly competitive mid-range segment, the Mi Max 2 is a smartphone that simply stands out. It certainly isn't for everyone, but it rewards those who can handle its size with a quality build, adequate performance, decent cameras, and exceptional battery life and multimedia experience.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Likewise, how Redmi Note 3 and Redmi Note 4 price didn’t change, I was expecting a similar case with the Mi Max 2 with under ₹15,000 price. Its predecessor has a price of ₹14,999 whereas its second generation comes with a price hike, available at ₹16,999 which is ₹2,000 more.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/20/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It might not be as fast as the original Mi Max, but performance isn’t the main reason you’ll be buying the MI Max 2. Crossing the boundary between phone and tablet, the gigantic 6.44in screen will leave those of you who like your phones big all hot under the collar. With more storage, an improved camera and longer battery life, the Mi Max 2 is a no-brainer of an upgrade.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is the right budget phablet for those who don't have the Mi Max already. Premium buyers can get a far better phone with the Galaxy C9 Pro.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/18/2017
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To sum up, the Mi Max 2 banks heavily on display and battery performance. The smartphone is not a like a regular smartphone, you will find it in the market. The large screen is ideal for media consumptions, but it also makes it a bit difficult to operate as compared to other smartphones. As for the competition is concerned, the device will pit against Lenovo Vibe P2, Motorola Moto G5 Plus and others in terms of hardware specifications.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/18/2017
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While phablets are still too big for constant everyday use due to their large pocket footprint and degree of difficulty to hold, they are still perfect for leisurely use. The Mi Max 2 was an outstanding device to use for web browsing, social media, watching videos, and light gaming. Knowing that it will last a very long time on heavy use with its large battery makes it perfect for just that.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/06/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In terms of Antutu performance, Xiaomi MI MAX 2 can be not so excellent, but in terms of photographing, battery life, craftsmanship, and price, Xiaomi MI MAX 2 can be a amazing smartphone, after all its official price is 1,699 yuan, $283. And it has large screen and durable battery life that most users like. We believe you will enjoy it a lot. You can use this coupon code: GB9% to catch Xiaomi MI MAX 2 at lower price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/26/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% price: 91%
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/11/2017
Source: Android TV DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 85%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/07/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 84% display: 82% mobility: 98%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: El Confidencial ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/17/2017
Source: Descargar.mobi ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/12/2017
Source: Tutto App Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/07/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/03/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 85% features: 76% display: 85% mobility: 96% workmanship: 78%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/25/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Style HD IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/24/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 80% display: 78% mobility: 95% workmanship: 70%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/16/2017
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 85% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 98% ergonomy: 55%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/23/2017
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: One Tech PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/24/2017
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2017
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/26/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/22/2017
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 74% display: 90% mobility: 100%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 61% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/27/2017
Source: KinaTech HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/25/2017
Source: VNReview VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/30/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/04/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/11/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/26/2017
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Reviewzat →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/01/2017
Xiaomi Mi5X
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi5XProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 506
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.165kg
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Mad Shrimps EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5X has impressed us quite a bit in terms of build quality, performance, camera quality, GPS locking speed, accuracy and also sports a decent battery life. This model is a 5.5’’ phablet with a Full HD resolution screen and runs the latest MIUI 9.2 version; the same hardware is also sold with a different name “Mi A1” under the Android One software, if you do prefer a clean, non-skinned Android experience. GearBest lends a helping hand in order to avoid Customs hassles for European customers, so they have this model as ready to ship from their EU warehouse. The product link for this particular model can be accessed from HERE.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/06/2018
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Mi 5X from Xiaomi is one of the best devices in its price category. A powerful, powerful, reliable smartphone with an excellent screen and good autonomy. A lot of additional features and settings, high-quality cameras and a very smart fingerprint scanner make it a strong competitor to even more expensive flagships from second-tier manufacturers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/10/2017
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, the 5X is one of the best budget phones I have ever tried so much so that it feels like you are getting a 2000 ringgit device for the price of only 950 ringgit which the 5X cost. Xiaomi has also produced the Mi A1 which is basically the 5X running on a pure stock android. If you do not like the MIUI interface that comes with the 5X, you can easily opt of the A1 which is the exact same specs but running on stock android. If you are looking to pick up the 5x, you can head over to GearBest as they are having a promotion on the phone which you can pick up for under RM1,000.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 95% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi 5X is pretty straightforward - one of the most affordable smartphones in the upper midrange, where available, that is. It offers great dual-camera experience on the cheap and that can't be matched by any reputable maker.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/19/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Compared with Xiaomi MI5C, Xiaomi MI5X has more beautiful design, and it also has dual rear camera with more advantage, besides, its battery life and price are also attractive, if you want a competitive mid-range smartphone with good camera and battery, you can try this phone. Right now Xiaomi MI 5X 3GB 32GB version is in flash sale at $216.99, and 4GB+64GB version at $249.99.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/19/2017
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5X is a mixed bag of goodies but not really a master of anything. It’s got a nice design, decent performance, and good hardware. But that’s just it — nothing really outstanding. Even the dual rear camera which is supposed to be its main selling point is only above average at best. It is only good on daylight shots and while the optical zoom feature of the secondary camera does the job well, we don’t see much use for it.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/12/2017
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite the disappointing numbers from its battery test, it’s not hard to see the value the Xiaomi Mi 5x gives. Again, you’re mostly seeing devices with the same processing package at a high price bracket, which already makes this phone from the Chinese brand worth a look. Perhaps, the only thing holding us back from giving it a glowing recommendation is the company’s status in the country and the lack of an official warranty. It’s still pretty tough to pass up though and you are getting an in-store warranty.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2017
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If there’s one brand that always comes up, whether it’d be on reviews for the latest phone release or just leaks for devices to come, it has got to be Xiaomi. We can’t really blame you, they made a significant impact when they came to our shores in an official capacity, and a good portion of our readership still clamors for the bang-for-your-buck product from the Chinese brand. Thankfully, online retailers still keep stock of the phones from the popular brand and one of their latest devices just arrived at HQ. Today, we’re going to be taking the Xiaomi Mi 5x for a quick go-around before it goes in for its full review.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/24/2017
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 52% display: 82% mobility: 74% workmanship: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 95% price: 93%
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2017
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/24/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/13/2017
Source: El Confidencial ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/19/2017
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 80% performance: 75% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 80% features: 65% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Tutto App Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/23/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% features: 82% display: 82% mobility: 88% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 89% features: 77% display: 75% mobility: 83% ergonomy: 72%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/06/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% features: 85% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 89% display: 79% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/17/2017
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/28/2017
Source: KinaTech HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/29/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/24/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/03/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/27/2017
Xiaomi Mi Note 3
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi Note 3Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 510
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.163kg
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Looking to improve features and performance principally for Chinese consumers, Xiaomi has really upped its game for photography with the Mi Note 3. Compared to the Mi 5 and Mi 5S Plus (the last Xiaomi devices we tested), the Mi Note 3 shows significant signs of development, improving still photos in many areas and adding those desirable zoom and bokeh features, which are well-implemented. Our new challenging test scenes highlight some issues with texture on moving subjects, but in static scenes detail is good both outdoors and indoors, and autofocus is fast. When all is said and done, by offering premium flagship photography features and performance at a mid-range price point, the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 is a great choice for the budget-savvy smartphone shooter.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Gogi.in EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Note 3 looks premium and performance was impressive, the MIUI 9 makes it even better. This handset is not available in India and if you are planning to buy this, you can order from GearBest, you will need to pay custom duty consider that too.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Gogi.in EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This Mi Note is not to be confused with Redmi Note series that is available in India, both are different. This variant I got comes with 6GB RAM and 64GB ROM. It packs a 3500 mAh battery. There is LED notification, there is dual SIM slot, you need 2x nano SIM’s there is no micro SD slot and OTG is supported. The home button on the front doubles up as finger print sensor, there is IR blaster too.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/23/2017
Source: BGR EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Its similarities to the iPhone’s Plus models are hardly a knock against Xiaomi, as the company has never been shy about following trends set by the big dogs in mobile, but the real story here is how well they manage to pull it off. It would be much harder to excuse the obvious Apple inspiration if the phone wasn’t such a pleasure. Oh, and then there’s the little matter of it being incredibly affordable, with prices landing at around $450 depending on where you look. Gearbest (which provided our review unit) currently has the Mi Note 3 at $409.99.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/17/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Compared with Xiaomi mi note 2, Xiaomi MI Note 3 has different market position, since Xiaomi MI MIX series became the flagship, although Xiaomi MI Note 3 chooses Snapdragon 660 processor, it still has excellent design, craftsmanship, face ID, good camera, etc, so if you want larger screen, MI Note 3 will be better choice. Right now Xiaomi MI Note 3 is in flash sale from Gearbest at $549.99.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/15/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi has announced three new products few day ago: The Xiaomi Notebook Pro, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 and grade 3 – and the Note 3 has surprised us! Had the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 still above the Mi5s filed, the Grade 3 now ranks below the MI6. The spearhead of Xiaomi will now form the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2ndInstead of MI6 Plus now the Mi Note 3 is coming! The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 slims, in contrast to its predecessor, significantly from: 5.5 “inches instead of 5.7”, a Snapdragon processor from the upper middle class and a significantly lower price. Succeeds, the attack on the iPhone Plus?
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/13/2017
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you're coming from the Mi Note 2, we suggest you look towards the Mi MIX 2 instead. That'll be a significant upgrade, since you'd get a 5.99-inch in a 5.5-inch body, instead of the 5.7-inch display Mi Note 2 users were working with previously.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/12/2017
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/29/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2017
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/25/2018
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 85% features: 80% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tutto App Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/14/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% performance: 85% features: 87% display: 85% mobility: 88% workmanship: 82% ergonomy: 82%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 85% features: 88% display: 89% mobility: 93% ergonomy: 78%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 85% display: 75% mobility: 87% workmanship: 81%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/13/2017
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/16/2017
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/14/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/12/2017
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 835
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 540
Display: 6.00 inch, 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.185kg
Price: 600 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Neck and neck. One year after the launch of the predecessor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix, the Chinese manufacturer has now released a new model. Not much has changed on the outside, apart from the device shrinking slightly. While other Asian manufacturers are fighting for customers with very competitive prices, Xiaomi displays confidence in its pricing, thereby placing its focus on quality and design.
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There are other negatives. It doesn’t have a 3.5mm jack, there’s no IP68 water-resistance, there’s no microSD slot (only two slots for nano SIMs), and the ceramic finish attracts fingerprints. Plus, if I’m being truly finickity, the camera housing protrudes a little. Nevertheless, if you can forgive these foibles and surmount that Chinese interface, then you will own an object of true beauty.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s only going be a small subset of customers for this device outside of the few countries where it’s officially sold. That’s really a shame because I believe that this was one of the best devices of 2017 and still remains a solid buy in 2018. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S is coming soon, but it’s only a relatively small change and I think you could save the money and pick up the Mi Mix 2 and be just as happy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% display: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 is a strikingly designed smartphone for a cut of the price compared to its flagship competitors. In most departments it more than gives them a run for their money, too. It's powerful, that ultra-trim bezel is well considered and gives the device a look like no other, while the 18:9 ratio screen is ideal for one-handed use.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi MIX 2 is one of those handsets that you will probably never see another soul using if you live outside of Asia. If you are someone who likes having something unique, this is probably the handset for you. The device starts at $465 and can go a little higher if you choose to opt for more RAM and internal storage space. But considering that Samsung and LG are charging around $700 and over for their flagships, this isn't a bad price at all for what you get.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi 6 was already doing the bare minimum for budget flagships, and the same missing features on a pricier Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 places a huge emphasis on its bezel-less display, which in itself, isn't as feature-filled as its competition. However, it is still the most affordable bezel-less experience without the insane price tags as of late, paired with great performance returns. If you still want to experience using a bezel-less or edge-to-edge flagship smartphone before diving into the deep, pricey end with all the bells and whistles, the Mi MIX 2 is an excellent place to begin for S$699.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2 offers incredible power, great looks and an excellent user interface experience at a price that puts many other top-tier phones to shame.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In practically every regard the Mi Mix 2 is a flagship handset that can stand proud with the best the smartphone world has to offer.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: The Techy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2 is a sleek looking flagship smartphone from Xiaomi. The phone features a design that is dominated by the immersive display and impressed with the edge-to-edge experience. Well, like any other device, the phone has its pros and cons. We witness a frequent call drop on both incoming and outgoing calls even though we have the strongest network in our area. The front camera is located at the unusual location which makes it difficult to capture good selfies unless you turn the phone by 180-degrees. It looks great and proves to be a winner when it comes to performance. If you can live with the Mi Mix 2’s average camera and Xiaomi’s own MIUI 9, then it is certainly a compelling flagship.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For the money -- less than half the price of an iPhone X and two-thirds the price of a Samsung Galaxy S8 -- Xiaomi's Mi Mix 2 is a stunning smartphone. It looks and feels fantastic, performs well and represents a near-miracle of packaging. And on top of all that, you'll have a phone that none of your friends or colleagues have.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It might seem alien at first, but there's little need to be sceptical: the Mi Mix 2 wraps all the home comforts of an Android flagship in an altogether more affordable device, without compromising the design. It's a great sign of the future to come from this maker.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/29/2017
Source: Androidbeat EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As I mentioned at the beginning of this review, the Mi Mix 2 is a work of art. The design of the handset is straight up gorgeous and photos don’t do justice to just how beautiful it looks in real life. Once you have seen the Mi Mix 2 in real life, there’s no way you can ignore it. The handset is not without its own demerits which includes the 12MP primary camera being a disappointment and the weird position of the 5MP front camera. None of that, however, changes the fact that the Mi Mix 2 is an excellent smartphone. For its price of Rs 35,999, the handset rivals the incredibly popular OnePlus 5 in India which it handily beats in the design and build department.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/24/2017
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 is likely the most stylish smartphone with the full-screen display. It has good battery timings whereas it doesn’t have microSD card slot, no headset jack and the phone is not water-resistant. The device is a little bit expensive because Xiaomi is a new company in Pakistan so the audience will take time to spend that much money on Xiaomi device.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/24/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, whether it is Mi Mix 2 ceramic version or all-ceramic version, the appearance of a full screen and ceramic body design, as well as the flagship processor brings powerful performance and low power consumption, so from which aspects it Is a very cool technology products.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2017
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s nothing bad here, so don’t take that the wrong way. But when you’re used to Samsung and Google’s way of handling Android, Xiaomi’s skin almost feels like a completely different operating system. I’m still not 100% used to it after a few weeks of playing with it, and I think most people in my situation would feel the same.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2017
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As Xiaomi marches ahead towards dominating smartphone sales in India, it can’t just count on the Redmi series to be its cash cow. Capturing the midrange and premium smartphone market with larger margins is the bigger play here. In spite of the me-too route, Xiaomi is smartly launching devices that have a gimmick to offer. The Mi A1 comes with stock Android, the Mi Mix 2 ships with almost no bezels. By differentiating themselves from the competition, the company hopes to offer a unique proposition.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But the Mi Mix 2 is still a fantastic phone: significantly faster than its predecessor, and much better looking. Better still, it's as affordable as ever, making it a great alternative to other Android flagships - provided you can either live without or cope with having to set up Google services yourself.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2 is the perfect bezel-less phone for Android fans all over the world, but can be hard to get if you don't live in China or India.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi has tasted one success after another over the past 12-18 months, and the company looks set to dethrone Samsung as the number one player by volume in India’s smartphone market. This has largely been possible because of its budget Redmi offerings, but recently, we’ve seen the company looking to experiment with other price bands and product segments with the likes of the Xiaomi Mi A1 and the recently launched Redmi Y1 series.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Which, by and large, all sounds great, so surely the Mi Mix 2 is as pricey as its other 18:9 screen, trim bezel, high-powered flagship competitors? Well, no, not even nearly. With its €499 asking price in Europe - well, Spain for the time being, which is where the handset launches on 11 November 2017 (hopefully with more European nations to follow) - it's a lot, lot more affordable than the competition. It even has the potential to slap about OnePlus with its imminent 5T launch. Changing times.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/07/2017
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To sum up, the smartphone comes loaded with some premium design along with top-of-the-line performance and battery comfortably last a day. However, both the cameras are average and there is no scaling option. To conclude, the phone can be considered as a good option if you fancy bezel-less display with some premium look, but overall, it faces a stiff competition with the likes of OnePlus 5, LG G6, and more.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/06/2017
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 carries on the legacy of its predecessor. It has a tall screen, minuscule bezels at three sides and has a ceramic back that makes the phone look more premium. Of course, the Mi MIX 2 comes with a smaller screen as compared to the Mi MIX, but, that makes it more compact and operable with one hand.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/30/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is an elite smartphone that offers a combination of cutting-edge performance, incredible bezel-less design and true premium feel in every way. In addition to some of the slight objections that apply to the Chinese version of the MIUI user interface, the average camera and slip in the hands of this device have nothing to complain about. We were really pleased with this smartphone in the world.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/30/2017
Source: Gadget Diary EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2 is by far Xiaomi’s most good looking flagship, and the best part is that it isn’t just about beauty. The device performs equally well as the OnePlus 5, but you’ll have to shell out an extra some for that exceptional design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/28/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi has established itself as a force in the budget smartphone market in India, and as the number two smartphone vendor in the country, it is inching closer to the market leader Samsung with every launch.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/27/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 is not exactly an easy phone to recommend. Or, at least not universally applicable as such. For us reviewers, constantly entrenched in the thick of the smartphone realm, with dozens of handsets coming and going, it constitutes a breath of fresh air. A nice shift and interesting new trend in design and take on the tired "slab" form factor.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All in all, the Mi Mix 2 is one very exotic and unconventional smartphone.Xiaomi has put a big emphasis on the design of this handset, which has led to sacrifices being made in other key areas such as the camera department.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s no doubt Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 delivers on the premium experience. Yes, the design is different and the display excellent. But that’s never enough. It’s definitely a phone worth considering, if you don’t really care for dual rear cameras. But nonetheless, Xiaomi will have a tough time convincing customers to pick this one from the several other mid-range flagships in the market.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To sum it up, the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is indeed a beautiful smartphone, and, the bezel-less design makes it look more gorgeous. Of course, the phone does have a glossy back and it tends to slip off your hands, however, it does come bundled along with a nice quality hard case which you can snap on to the device for extra protection.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/17/2017
Source: Tech2 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2 is Xiaomi’s best flagship smartphone offering yet. It almost is an all-rounder if you don’t factor in its abnormal low light camera performance. With that said, it performs equally good as the OnePlus 5 if not better on some fronts (just that it does not come with a Portrait mode).
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2 is a great device and has its strengths lying in areas such as aesthetic bezel-less design, strong built quality and vibrant display. Apart from that, it performed very well in all the everyday tasks without any hiccups. It is easily Xiaomi's best built smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gogi.in EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I guess the review cleared all your doubt. If you are looking for a premium handset then Mi Mix 2 is an excellent option for the price. One thing is for sure, once you get this handset you are going to get a lot of attention, I mean the Mi Mix 2.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 96%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi 6 was already doing the bare minimum for budget flagships, and the same missing features on a pricier Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 places a huge emphasis on its bezel-less display, which in itself, isn't as feature-filled as its competition. However, it is still the most affordable bezel-less experience without the insane price tags as of late, paired with great performance returns. If you still want to experience using a bezel-less or edge-to-edge flagship smartphone before diving into the deep, pricey end with all the bells and whistles, the Mi MIX 2 is an excellent place to begin.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: PC Quest EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi became the first to launch a truly full screen display smartphone in India with Mi MIX 2, a gorgeous evolution of Mi MIX, the revolutionary concept phone unveiled a year ago.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/11/2017
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi has launched its high-end flagship phone with a near bezel-less screen, the Mi Mix 2, in India at a hefty price tag of Rs 35,999. Successor to last year's concept phone Mi Mix, the Mi Mix 2, is notably Xiaomi's most expensive phone in India to date. Considering what it brings to the table, however, it takes no genius to ascertain that the Mi Mix 2 ought to be an expensive phone. In line with current-generation high-end flagship phones like the Samsung Galaxy Note 8, the LG V30 and even Apple's soon-to-be available iPhone X.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 has all the makings of a true flagship, but it's weak in the camera department. Barring that, this is the phone for those who have mid-ranged budgets and want a phone that feels extremely premium and high-end.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech PP EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mix 2 has evolved from a crazy concept phone to a usable flagship phone. The all-screen front will ensure it stands out in the crowd. The ceramic back and the 18K-carat golden rim around the camera will ensure the phone looks premium. The Snapdragon 835 paired to 6GB of RAM will ensure you have a snappy experience throughout. The support for global LTE bands ensures one can use the Mix 2 no matter where they reside (you can purchase it from e-retailers like Gearbest and Aliexpress if you are not from China or India). If you can live with some obvious shortcomings in MIUI 9 and an average camera (by modern flagship standards), the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 has a lot to offer for ~$550 even after the vanity factor of bezel-less display wears off in the near future. For now, Xiaomi has blended all that style with a great deal of substance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 85% performance: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 95%
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi MIX2 compared to MIX, improved the criticism of the handset problem, the use of conventional handset speaker with the catheter, the handset sound quality, and the normal mobile phone is no different The other is to reduce the screen to 18: 9 5.99 inches, one hand more friendly. Abandon the ceramic frame using the metal material, easier to mass production, reduce costs. unibody all ceramic enjoyment version is millet to explore the new ceramic material of another progress.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/01/2017
Source: BGR EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Much like a concept car which has its boldest, but ultimately unconventional aspects toned down before hitting the assembly line, the Mi Mix served as the inspiration for what is ultimately a more usable, but still unique device in the Mi Mix 2. The software is perhaps a bit rough around the edges if you’re buying one for use outside of China, but that shouldn’t stop you from enjoying the many upsides it has to offer. The Mi Mix 2 starts at around $600, depending on where you find it, but GearBest (which provided our review unit) currently has it for $569.99.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/01/2017
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So what’s our final verdict? Of the 7 factors we mentioned at the start of the post, the Mi Mix 2 passes most of them with flying colors, especially with Design (Build), Power, Display, and Battery Life. The only real issues are with the camera and the software (which can be remedied if you exert effort).
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/29/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All in all, the main problem the Mi Mix 2 is that the things its predecessor did differently are now standard in the smartphone world. The original Mi Mix was co-opted by the Essential Phone, among others, and we are seeing a move toward the phone’s 2:1 aspect ratio (well, 17:9 but close enough), along with minimal bezel displays, across the industry.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 85% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Last year Xiaomi mi mix made all of mi fans stunned, according to users’ feedback, it has some disadvantages, but Xiaomi MI MIX 2 has changed the disadvantages, lighter design, better camera, larger battery, latest OS, and improved hardware, etc. We believe most users will be very satisfied with it. Right now Geekbuying starts to sell Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 to $652.99 via coupon.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/13/2017
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
That said, a bezel-less display at just CNY3,299 (~S$681.23) is too affordable to ignore. The Mi MIX 2's design is appealing, and Xiaomi paid plenty of attention to maximizing the display's utility. We'd have a better assessment when we try the phone within the confines of our sunny shores, but until then, the Mi MIX 2 is what it is - innovative design at an accessible price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/12/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, what we really like about the Mi Mix 2 is that it takes a lot of the same cues from its predecessor while making it more accessible. The phone is a lot easier to handle even with a 6-inch screen, which alleviates one of the major concerns from last year.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/11/2017
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At the moment, it still remains to be seen if the Mi Mix 2 will ever be brought into Malaysia officially. Then again, considering the fact that the device supports 43 different bands, we reckon the Mi Mix 2 won’t just be a China-only product. Hopefully, the Mi Mix 2 will be officially sold in Malaysia in the near future; if priced right, it may be a winner for Xiaomi.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/11/2017
Source: Futurezone.at DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/22/2018
Source: Smart Checker DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2018
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/11/2018
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/08/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 87%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Hartware DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/02/2017
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/30/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 87% performance: 100% features: 80% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 70% features: 80% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 70% features: 80% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/03/2017
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 95% display: 95% mobility: 85% workmanship: 93%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2017
Source: Kustruki ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/20/2017
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 85% performance: 85% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/14/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/12/2018
Source: Tutto App Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/06/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tutto App Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/20/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 75% features: 82% display: 88% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 81% features: 95% display: 89% mobility: 81% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/20/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 60% display: 79% mobility: 50% workmanship: 88%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/30/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% features: 85% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/11/2017
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Meilleurmobile FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/28/2017
Source: Journal du Geek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/26/2017
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/08/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 95% display: 95% mobility: 95% workmanship: 90%
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/18/2017
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/13/2017
Source: Mobileimho.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/28/2018
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/12/2018
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/21/2017
Source: DGL.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/19/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 59% performance: 90% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/28/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/15/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/12/2017
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/12/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/03/2017
Source: VNReview VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/18/2018
Source: Tinh Te VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/24/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/16/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/11/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Unlimited Tech →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/08/2017
Rating: performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2SProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 845
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 630
Display: 5.99 inch, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.189kg
Price: 799 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
First League. A Snapdragon 845 SoC, up to 8 GB of RAM, a dual camera system, and a 6-inch display - with its first-rate equipment, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S enters the direct competition against the top dogs such as the Apple iPhone X. Our test shows whether the current Xiaomi flagship can really stir up the smartphone high-end.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The original full-display smartphone is evolving into something really special. Now with wireless charging, faster performance and a dual-camera that builds in AI, the Mi Mix 2S is a closer rival to western flagships than ever - and at a fraction of the price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At just over $500 but rivaling the specs of a Samsung flagship, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S is a fantastic value in the same vein as the OnePlus series of phones. While it has a couple head-scratching design snafus, you will never be disappointed by the performance of the device as a whole.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 90% performance: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I’ve only spent about a week with the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S, but early returns on the device are great. It’s got a unique design, great aesthetic, phenomenal, flagship-caliber specifications and a much-improved UI that’s just different enough to set it apart.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/02/2018
Source: Manila Shaker EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For a price of Php 27,990 (6GB + 64GB storage) and Php 29,990 (6GB +128GB storage), this device is worth it if you’re the type of person that uses the phone for gaming, watching videos and web browsing.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/13/2018
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall Xiaomi offers a great product, while not perfect in every aspect, it also doesn’t have any immediate deal breakers that I would say would put it out of consideration for buyers. The screen is one thing that’s subjective and if you have the chance, it’s best to be experienced and evaluated it in person. Oh, and it doesn’t have a headphone jack, so that’s also a thing. All in all, it’s definitely priced where it should be.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/29/2018
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S has fixed battery of Li-ion 3400 mAh, the satisfactory battery. It would have been much better if they provide 4000 mAh battery because it has 6GB RAM or 8GB RAM with an octa-core processor. It will resume more energy than any other smartphone. Excessive usage of the camera can drain the battery very rapidly.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S, although, an updated version of the Mi Mix 2, is a device worthy to be called a flagship and can compete with other devices in its class. Let’s do a rundown – it has a large 5.99 FHD+ display with slim bezels, Snapdragon 845 chipset, 6GB RAM, and great-performing dual rear cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/19/2018
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With improved cameras, a large, notch-less display, Snapdragon 845 processor and great cameras (on the rear at least) the Mi Mix 2s is probably the most compelling budget flagship you can buy today under 30K. We have a feeling that we’ll be eating our words when the OnePlus 6 officially gets priced in the Philippines by Digital Walker in a few days but for now, the Mi Mix 2s is the best value for money flagship you can get if you’re cash strapped and need a powerful machine for less.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2018
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
L’habit ne fait pas le moine, le Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S reste une évolution majeure par rapport au Mi Mix 2. Certes son design est quasi identique. Cependant, nous avons droit à un appareil photo principal largement amélioré. Les performances assurées par le Snapdragon 845 sont tout simplement excellentes. L’autonomie et l’écran ne font pas non plus défaut à l’appareil. Cerise sur le gâteau, toutes nos bandes de fréquences 4G sont supportées.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Its custom MIUI interface takes some getting used to, but the big and beautiful, notch-less display, the capable camera, the well-executed gesture navigation and the overall sophistication and elegance of the design more than make up for it. If you are willing to deal with something new and different, and if you happen to live in a country where Xiaomi actually sells its phones, you should definitely consider buying the Mi Mix 2s.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2S majors on performance and design. With its ceramic, mirror-finish case and 18:9 display it looks and feels incredible in the hand.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S is yet another high end phone from the Chinese company that’s yet to make its way to the west. Though Xiaomi is strong in India and slowly popping up in Europe, plans for the U.S. seem inevitable but continue to be an ongoing internal discussion.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The phone is slated to retail at Php 27,990, making it only Php 1,000 more than the flagship killer, OnePlus’ 5T, which currently retails for Php 26,990 for the 6GB/64GB version with last year’s SD835 processor. With rumors of the OnePlus 6 costing considerably more than last year’s model, it’s entirely possible that Xiaomi’s Mi Mix 2s may end up being the flagship killer of 2018, at least locally.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/13/2018
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But that's not the reality. The Mi Mix 2S doesn't contend with the best devices in its class, and prospective buyers have to jump through too many hoops just to get their hands on one. It's interesting, but simply too inconvenient to recommend.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Regardless of how it would perform in the US, the Xiaomi Mi Mix lineup has morphed from a large unicorn in its original model, to a more manageable and streamlined model, fit for the average consumer. The Mi Mix 2S is an incredible value at its price point and one that will be hard to beat, but will see fierce competition in the category in the several months to come.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/06/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S is a phone that's as exciting as it is mystifying. The trim-bezel design and considerable power on board are great to behold for its price, yet the so-so screen and sometimes problematic software are just two of a handful of hurdles to overcome.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fudzilla EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2S, as we said, is an upgrade from last year's Mi Mix 2 phone. On the surface, the differences might look subtle, but in reality, the upgrade is noticeable and welcomed.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/24/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We might not be 100 per cent on board with the software, and the front-facing camera is inherently poorly placed (it's got to go somewhere, eh?), otherwise the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 is a shining example of just what can be achieved without a huge price tag being part and parcel of the deal.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/04/2018
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi hasn't yet confirmed when or even if the Mi Mix 2S will launch in India, and what its price might be. Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 for updates, as well as our detailed review of the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, in which we will extensively test the phone's cameras, performance, software, and battery life, and deliver a final verdict.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/30/2018
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi MIX 2S will be available in black and white for the price of 3,299 yuan ( about $524.54 ) for the 6/64 GB version (same price as the previous Mi MIX 2), 3,599 yuan ( about $572.24 ) for the 6 / model 128 GB, and finally 3,999 yuan ( about $635.84 ) for the top of the range, with 8/256 GB and with a wireless charging base included. The latter obviously also supports competing smartphones, such as iPhone X and Galaxy S8 / S9, and costs just 99 yuan, not even $15.74. Right now you can preorder it to use coupon code: VMSZDMWM at $589.99 for Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 6GB-64GB Black version.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I will be using the Mi Mix 2S for a while in its “natural habitat”, as I travel through parts of Asia. This phone will not be made available in the West, but at least the global bands return if you wish to import it. Stay tuned for my full review of the phone including the better camera, and then, when I get my hands on the final review unit and software, I will do a camera follow up to give it the fair treatment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2018
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2S is a good example of a device that aims very high, but at the same time is weighed down by costs and efficiency. Where the original Mi Mix was forward thinking, it had some issues that ultimately got Xiaomi to rethink the device’s direction, and to look for a balance between innovation, practicality, and cost. Does the Mi Mix 2S find that balance? We’re just as curious to find out.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/27/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, though, we like what we are seeing so far from this camera. Xiaomi told us that this is the best camera they have ever put on a phone and it shows. We would definitely be interested in exploring this aspect in more detail when we get the final retail unit.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/27/2018
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 95% display: 80% mobility: 69% workmanship: 100%
Source: Connect - 10/18
Single Review, , Medium, Date: 10/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% features: 82% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 77%
Source: Hartware DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/02/2018
Source: ZDNet DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/20/2018
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 95% display: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/03/2018
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/06/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2018
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 95% display: 95% mobility: 85% workmanship: 93%
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 100% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 100% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 85% display: 70% mobility: 85% workmanship: 100%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/03/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/05/2018
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/25/2018
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% features: 90% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/18/2018
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/15/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 83% features: 95% display: 89% mobility: 82% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% features: 90% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 72% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 88%
Source: Le monde numerique FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/28/2018
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 90% display: 87% mobility: 95% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/04/2018
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/04/2018
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 90% features: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 100% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 90% display: 95% mobility: 85% workmanship: 95%
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/03/2018
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 100% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/20/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/23/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/08/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/28/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/27/2018
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Unlimited Tech →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi Max 3Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 636
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 509
Display: 6.90 inch, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.221kg
Price: 250 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
6.9英寸的小米Max 3不仅为用户提供了比上一代还要大的屏幕,也在硬件配置上做出了一定的升级。
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
When you spend less than £250 on a phone you don't expect great things, but the Mi Max 3 might surprise you. This is not the fastest phone you'll find today, but it does have a very big, beautiful screen, capable cameras and some useful extra features.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
When you spend less than £250 on a phone you don't expect great things, but the Mi Max 3 might surprise you. This is not the fastest phone you'll find today, but it does have a very big, beautiful screen, capable cameras and some useful extra features.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Playing a particular angle in any product, especially tech is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, you could limit your goals to a particular niche requirement alone and cruse though everything else, cutting corners as you please. Chances are that with a unique enough offering, you can still make the bottom line work.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Playing a particular angle in any product, especially tech is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, you could limit your goals to a particular niche requirement alone and cruse though everything else, cutting corners as you please. Chances are that with a unique enough offering, you can still make the bottom line work.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, at this price, the performance of Xiaomi Max 3 is still very good. Inheriting the price of 1699 yuan from the previous work, whether it is the feel, battery life, photo or experience is superior, for the users who like a big screen, so it is a great choice for them.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/25/2018
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, at this price, the performance of Xiaomi Max 3 is still very good. Inheriting the price of 1699 yuan from the previous work, whether it is the feel, battery life, photo or experience is superior, for the users who like a big screen, so it is a great choice for them.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/25/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/08/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/08/2018
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/07/2018
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/07/2018
Source: Profesional Review ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% performance: 81% mobility: 92% workmanship: 79%
Source: Profesional Review ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% performance: 81% mobility: 92% workmanship: 79%
Source: Optima IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 80% performance: 75% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 65%
Source: Optima IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 80% performance: 75% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 65%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/22/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/22/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 57% features: 84%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 57% features: 84%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 85% display: 70% mobility: 98% workmanship: 71%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 85% display: 70% mobility: 98% workmanship: 71%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/26/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/26/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2018
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 85% display: 70% mobility: 98% workmanship: 71%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 85% display: 70% mobility: 98% workmanship: 71%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/20/2018
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/20/2018
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/03/2018
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/03/2018
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/02/2018
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/02/2018
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/17/2018
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/17/2018
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/07/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/07/2019
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/25/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/25/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2018
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 90% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 90% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi Mix 3Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 845
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 630
Display: 6.39 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.218kg
Price: 470 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
小米Mix 3采用久经考验的技术——滑盖和无边框,更重要的是它没有刘海。除此之外,小米Mix系列的最新产品也有另外一个惊喜。
Foreign Reviews
Source: Ricks Tech
Support, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2024
Source: Ricks Tech
Support, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2024
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 5G is faster and has a higher-capacity battery than the standard Mi Mix 3, yet weighs only 8g more. And while Vodafone’s 5G network is patchy right now, by the time you’re even halfway through your 24-month contract we should be in a completely different situation in terms of coverage. But are you prepared to pay double dollar for the priviledge of future-proofed connectivity and slightly better performance on an already fast phone?
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 08/01/2019
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone. In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come. The 5G variant is similarly good value, and not only the first 5G phone to go on sale in the UK but also the cheapest.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 5G is faster and has a higher-capacity battery than the standard Mi Mix 3, yet weighs only 8g more. And while Vodafone’s 5G network is patchy right now, by the time you’re even halfway through your 24-month contract we should be in a completely different situation in terms of coverage. But are you prepared to pay double dollar for the priviledge of future-proofed connectivity and slightly better performance on an already fast phone?
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 08/01/2019
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone. In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come. The 5G variant is similarly good value, and not only the first 5G phone to go on sale in the UK but also the cheapest.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This phone is different; it's interesting, powerful and offers a distinctive, nearly bezel-free design with great screen quality. You get a lot of phone for your money, although it's hard to recommend above and beyond some more conventional rivals, as its slider mechanism doesn't really add that much and the selfie camera quality is poor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This phone is different; it's interesting, powerful and offers a distinctive, nearly bezel-free design with great screen quality. You get a lot of phone for your money, although it's hard to recommend above and beyond some more conventional rivals, as its slider mechanism doesn't really add that much and the selfie camera quality is poor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone. In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come. The 5G variant is similarly good value, and not only the first 5G phone to go on sale in the UK but also the cheapest.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone. In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come. The 5G variant is similarly good value, and not only the first 5G phone to go on sale in the UK but also the cheapest.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This phone is different; it's interesting, powerful and offers a distinctive, nearly bezel-free design with great screen quality. You get a lot of phone for your money, although it's hard to recommend above and beyond some more conventional rivals, as its slider mechanism doesn't really add that much and the selfie camera quality is poor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This phone is different; it's interesting, powerful and offers a distinctive, nearly bezel-free design with great screen quality. You get a lot of phone for your money, although it's hard to recommend above and beyond some more conventional rivals, as its slider mechanism doesn't really add that much and the selfie camera quality is poor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone. In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone. In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come. Soon it will also be one of the first 5G phones in the world.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come. Soon it will also be one of the first 5G phones in the world.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Phandroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 is available on Amazon for $500 or as cheap as £400 in the UK. For the price, the device by Xiaomi is a great buy for those that want a premium feeling device without a notch. The specs on the device will handle anything you throw at it, which again for the price is impressive. However, MUI 10 may be a deal breaker for some that want a more vanilla Android experience and the sliding mechanism raises some longevity questions, which may deter some potential buyers. With solid battery life, a great display, decent camera, and good performance, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 should be on your list for consideration in the mid-range market.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phandroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 is available on Amazon for $500 or as cheap as £400 in the UK. For the price, the device by Xiaomi is a great buy for those that want a premium feeling device without a notch. The specs on the device will handle anything you throw at it, which again for the price is impressive. However, MUI 10 may be a deal breaker for some that want a more vanilla Android experience and the sliding mechanism raises some longevity questions, which may deter some potential buyers. With solid battery life, a great display, decent camera, and good performance, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 should be on your list for consideration in the mid-range market.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you're intrigued by the device's neo-slider form-factor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 honestly feels like a downright steal at $899. The camera lacks the versatility or low-light performance you’d get out of the P30 Pro and it doesn’t feel as futuristic to use as something like the Samsung Galaxy S10 - but it’s still an incredibly compelling package at an incredibly compelling price and if you're looking for the best value-for-money flagship option available right this moment: this is probably it.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you're intrigued by the device's neo-slider form-factor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 honestly feels like a downright steal at $899. The camera lacks the versatility or low-light performance you’d get out of the P30 Pro and it doesn’t feel as futuristic to use as something like the Samsung Galaxy S10 - but it’s still an incredibly compelling package at an incredibly compelling price and if you're looking for the best value-for-money flagship option available right this moment: this is probably it.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Outside of the score, we would like to praise Xiaomi for its “natural” camera tuning style, which is superior to Apple’s iPhone XS camera when it comes to capturing colors tones at night. The XS remains generally better with edge details and HDR in daylight.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2019
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Outside of the score, we would like to praise Xiaomi for its “natural” camera tuning style, which is superior to Apple’s iPhone XS camera when it comes to capturing colors tones at night. The XS remains generally better with edge details and HDR in daylight.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2019
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
That annoying play between the two halves aside, Xiaomi’s flagship slider is a pretty good buy if you’re looking for a device that delivers an all-screen experience for not much money.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2019
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
That annoying play between the two halves aside, Xiaomi’s flagship slider is a pretty good buy if you’re looking for a device that delivers an all-screen experience for not much money.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2019
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Still, I can’t recommend a phone that makes me feel less connected to the people in my life. Even after spending quite a bit of time in the settings making sure that there were zero settings stopping me from getting my notifications, the issues persisted. I even tried factory resetting and still had issues. If Xiaomi ever figures out software or gives users the option of using pure Android over its skin, I’ll be the first in line for its devices. Until then, buyer beware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/09/2019
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Still, I can’t recommend a phone that makes me feel less connected to the people in my life. Even after spending quite a bit of time in the settings making sure that there were zero settings stopping me from getting my notifications, the issues persisted. I even tried factory resetting and still had issues. If Xiaomi ever figures out software or gives users the option of using pure Android over its skin, I’ll be the first in line for its devices. Until then, buyer beware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/09/2019
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It has both pros and cons, but taken as a complete package the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is one of the best mid-to-upper-range Android phones on the market in 2019.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It has both pros and cons, but taken as a complete package the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is one of the best mid-to-upper-range Android phones on the market in 2019.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Having recently told you about another SmartPhone from this company, here – their latest – has landed on my desk. Anything designed by Phillipe Starck is always eye catching; an early DAB radio was his work and still sits on my bedside table in daily use.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Having recently told you about another SmartPhone from this company, here – their latest – has landed on my desk. Anything designed by Phillipe Starck is always eye catching; an early DAB radio was his work and still sits on my bedside table in daily use.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 seems like a very deliberate attempt by Xiaomi to make a smartphone with a unique design that stands out from its rivals. That's an understandable impulse, but modern smartphone design and usage has become very standardized, especially in hardware, and users can get attached to certain features. Some people may balk at a phone with a slider and prefer similarly priced handsets like the Honor View 20 or OnePlus 6T, which have less idiosyncratic designs.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 seems like a very deliberate attempt by Xiaomi to make a smartphone with a unique design that stands out from its rivals. That's an understandable impulse, but modern smartphone design and usage has become very standardized, especially in hardware, and users can get attached to certain features. Some people may balk at a phone with a slider and prefer similarly priced handsets like the Honor View 20 or OnePlus 6T, which have less idiosyncratic designs.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, we like what Xiaomi is bringing to the table. The SD855 edition of the Mi Mix 3 sort of explains why the regular Mi Mix 3 comes with Snapdragon 845. The Explorer edition is a nice spin to the already quite intriguing specs that the regular Mi 9 has. And the Mi 9 SE, well, we're looking forward to putting it through its paces in our review routine.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, we like what Xiaomi is bringing to the table. The SD855 edition of the Mi Mix 3 sort of explains why the regular Mi Mix 3 comes with Snapdragon 845. The Explorer edition is a nice spin to the already quite intriguing specs that the regular Mi 9 has. And the Mi 9 SE, well, we're looking forward to putting it through its paces in our review routine.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi's flagship phone is almost the perfect phone, and the company's making it available in even more countries. The bad news is the US isn't one of them.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi's flagship phone is almost the perfect phone, and the company's making it available in even more countries. The bad news is the US isn't one of them.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Probably the only thing that’s working against the Mi Mix 3 is its small-ish battery capacity, coming in at 3200mAh. Thankfully the phone has Qualcomm’s QuickCharge 4 and wireless charging capability out of the box.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/13/2019
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Probably the only thing that’s working against the Mi Mix 3 is its small-ish battery capacity, coming in at 3200mAh. Thankfully the phone has Qualcomm’s QuickCharge 4 and wireless charging capability out of the box.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/13/2019
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 3 only came to Malaysia in January this year since it was released in China last year during October, but nothing is ever too late if the price is right which they nailed it. Starting at RM2199 (or RM2299 if you want the Sapphire Blue or Jade Green), this bad boy has most of the features covered - using the current best Snapdragon chipset, great camera performance, it can play games well, a true maximized full-screen for video playback and a classy design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is the phone to buy if you like to watch movies and TV episodes on your way to work.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 3 only came to Malaysia in January this year since it was released in China last year during October, but nothing is ever too late if the price is right which they nailed it. Starting at RM2199 (or RM2299 if you want the Sapphire Blue or Jade Green), this bad boy has most of the features covered - using the current best Snapdragon chipset, great camera performance, it can play games well, a true maximized full-screen for video playback and a classy design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is the phone to buy if you like to watch movies and TV episodes on your way to work.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 steps into the past to bring us the future. The slider phone design makes way for a display-forward and almost bezel-free design that's unlike its pricier mechanised alternatives from Oppo and Vivo. And as the Mi Mix 3 arrives in the UK, it keeps its Honor and Lenovo competitors at bay.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 steps into the past to bring us the future. The slider phone design makes way for a display-forward and almost bezel-free design that's unlike its pricier mechanised alternatives from Oppo and Vivo. And as the Mi Mix 3 arrives in the UK, it keeps its Honor and Lenovo competitors at bay.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The last couple of years have been exciting for mobile photography, as manufacturers have developed multiple sensors and lenses for their rear cameras, and combined that hardware with advanced signal processing to maximize imaging possibilities. Xiaomi is one of the first to apply this approach to the front camera, and the benefits are clear, with the Mi MIX 3 delivering excellent results for flash and bokeh, thanks to the built-in selfie light and depth-sensing second sensor. Other attributes such as face exposure, color, and detail are also impressive, and thanks to generally good skin tone rendering, the Mi MIX 3 ranks high in our database of front camera image quality. There are things it can improve, of course, most notably the fact that both focus and depth of field are too limited. Denoising and dynamic range could be better as well, but given its many pluses, along with good results when shooting video, it’s clear that the Xiaomi Mi MIX 3 is a solid choice for the selfie enthusiast.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/22/2019
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The last couple of years have been exciting for mobile photography, as manufacturers have developed multiple sensors and lenses for their rear cameras, and combined that hardware with advanced signal processing to maximize imaging possibilities. Xiaomi is one of the first to apply this approach to the front camera, and the benefits are clear, with the Mi MIX 3 delivering excellent results for flash and bokeh, thanks to the built-in selfie light and depth-sensing second sensor. Other attributes such as face exposure, color, and detail are also impressive, and thanks to generally good skin tone rendering, the Mi MIX 3 ranks high in our database of front camera image quality. There are things it can improve, of course, most notably the fact that both focus and depth of field are too limited. Denoising and dynamic range could be better as well, but given its many pluses, along with good results when shooting video, it’s clear that the Xiaomi Mi MIX 3 is a solid choice for the selfie enthusiast.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/22/2019
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Really, though, considering its price that is less than that of a OnePlus phone, there is little we could hold against the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. It looks gorgeous, the full screen experience is something really cool, the gesture navigation is among the best we’ve used and it’s a joy just navigation around, plus you have plentiful storage on board.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 89%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Really, though, considering its price that is less than that of a OnePlus phone, there is little we could hold against the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. It looks gorgeous, the full screen experience is something really cool, the gesture navigation is among the best we’ve used and it’s a joy just navigation around, plus you have plentiful storage on board.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 89%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This phone is different; it's interesting, powerful and offers a distinctive, nearly bezel-free design with great screen quality. You get a lot of phone for your money, although it's hard to recommend above and beyond some more conventional rivals, as its slider mechanism doesn't really add that much and the selfie camera quality is poor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 is an impressively high-end device for the price. However, its unique design solves a problem that newer phones have since managed to more elegantly.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This phone is different; it's interesting, powerful and offers a distinctive, nearly bezel-free design with great screen quality. You get a lot of phone for your money, although it's hard to recommend above and beyond some more conventional rivals, as its slider mechanism doesn't really add that much and the selfie camera quality is poor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 is an impressively high-end device for the price. However, its unique design solves a problem that newer phones have since managed to more elegantly.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Slashgear EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is set for release in the UK for £499 in Onyx Black or Sapphire Blue. There’s a limited deal appearing right out the gate for £449 when it launches at 12pm on the 16th of January 2019. If you’re buying from a source in China (online, even), you can find the device for around £445, shipped for free to the UK. This device isn’t currently available on Amazon, but if you’re getting one shipped to the USA through a source like GearBest, you can find this phone for around $550 USD.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Slashgear EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is set for release in the UK for £499 in Onyx Black or Sapphire Blue. There’s a limited deal appearing right out the gate for £449 when it launches at 12pm on the 16th of January 2019. If you’re buying from a source in China (online, even), you can find the device for around £445, shipped for free to the UK. This device isn’t currently available on Amazon, but if you’re getting one shipped to the USA through a source like GearBest, you can find this phone for around $550 USD.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 is an excellent offer coming just before the next flagship season. Xiaomi will be upgrading the phone in a month or two with the next 5G-capable Snapdragon chipset, but the price will go north of the current €500 mark.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 92%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 is an excellent offer coming just before the next flagship season. Xiaomi will be upgrading the phone in a month or two with the next 5G-capable Snapdragon chipset, but the price will go north of the current €500 mark.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 92%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 doesn’t disappoint as a flagship smartphone. It offers fantastic specs with great performance, great design, a near bezel-less screen, and a fantastic camera that takes excellent photos in all conditions. It lacks battery capacity and isn’t water resistant, but that’s a sacrifice you’ll have to make if you want to experience a new take on an old design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 doesn’t disappoint as a flagship smartphone. It offers fantastic specs with great performance, great design, a near bezel-less screen, and a fantastic camera that takes excellent photos in all conditions. It lacks battery capacity and isn’t water resistant, but that’s a sacrifice you’ll have to make if you want to experience a new take on an old design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is an unquestionable looker, with a sliding mechanism that’s better engineered for real-world use than some of its motorised competitors.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a true all-screen smartphone straight out of the future, yet it takes cues from our slider phone past. You physically slide the display down to expose the selfie camera, which does make it a bit thicker and heavier than your average phone, and we do have durability questions. But the price and flagship-level specs make it tempting.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 steps into the past to bring us the future once more. The slider phone design makes way for a display-forward and almost bezel-free design that's unlike its pricier mechanised alternatives from Oppo and Vivo.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is an unquestionable looker, with a sliding mechanism that’s better engineered for real-world use than some of its motorised competitors.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a true all-screen smartphone straight out of the future, yet it takes cues from our slider phone past. You physically slide the display down to expose the selfie camera, which does make it a bit thicker and heavier than your average phone, and we do have durability questions. But the price and flagship-level specs make it tempting.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 steps into the past to bring us the future once more. The slider phone design makes way for a display-forward and almost bezel-free design that's unlike its pricier mechanised alternatives from Oppo and Vivo.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Speaking of juice, the Mi MIX 3 only has a 3200mAh battery, mostly due to space constraints because of the sliding mechanism, though fast charging via QuickCharge 4+ and wireless charging capabilities make up for it.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Speaking of juice, the Mi MIX 3 only has a 3200mAh battery, mostly due to space constraints because of the sliding mechanism, though fast charging via QuickCharge 4+ and wireless charging capabilities make up for it.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 sets itself apart with its full-screen design, which targets a particular market of users who love having all the screen they can get – today. Because the design decisions behind this product are bold and therefore risky, the phone itself might be polarizing. Some people will love it, while others may laugh at the slider idea. In the end, it only matters how many people love it, and so far, the feedback is seemingly excellent.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/05/2018
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 sets itself apart with its full-screen design, which targets a particular market of users who love having all the screen they can get – today. Because the design decisions behind this product are bold and therefore risky, the phone itself might be polarizing. Some people will love it, while others may laugh at the slider idea. In the end, it only matters how many people love it, and so far, the feedback is seemingly excellent.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/05/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
zSlider phones are back and I couldn’t be happier. Nothing beats that satisfying snap as the phone clicks back into place. Xiaomi has updated the form factor for 2018 though, with a large bezel-free display, four cameras and premium ceramic build material. This is our Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 hands-on.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
zSlider phones are back and I couldn’t be happier. Nothing beats that satisfying snap as the phone clicks back into place. Xiaomi has updated the form factor for 2018 though, with a large bezel-free display, four cameras and premium ceramic build material. This is our Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 hands-on.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Sliders and flip phones were highly popular once, but the all touchscreen phone killed them off. The slider form factor is back and better than ever. Will the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 start a trend the same way that the original did (which was among the first tall aspect ratio smartphones)?
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All said, there's no doubt that the Mi Mix 3 continues in the run of exciting, adventurous and experimental phones to come out of China. Throughout 2018 it's been a veritable feature of future tech and, on this evidence, that strength will only continue.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Packing the same camera hardware as the Mi 8, Xiaomi’s latest smartphone has managed an improvement in its photography capabilities with modifications to its software and image processing algorithms. For still photos, it’s up there with some of the best devices we’ve tested, with good color, dynamic range, texture, and flash performance. Video performance is very similar to the Mi 8’s, although improved stabilization gives the Mi MIX 3 an advantage when shooting low-light movies. In short, the new Xiaomi is an excellent all-rounder.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Sliders and flip phones were highly popular once, but the all touchscreen phone killed them off. The slider form factor is back and better than ever. Will the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 start a trend the same way that the original did (which was among the first tall aspect ratio smartphones)?
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All said, there's no doubt that the Mi Mix 3 continues in the run of exciting, adventurous and experimental phones to come out of China. Throughout 2018 it's been a veritable feature of future tech and, on this evidence, that strength will only continue.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Packing the same camera hardware as the Mi 8, Xiaomi’s latest smartphone has managed an improvement in its photography capabilities with modifications to its software and image processing algorithms. For still photos, it’s up there with some of the best devices we’ve tested, with good color, dynamic range, texture, and flash performance. Video performance is very similar to the Mi 8’s, although improved stabilization gives the Mi MIX 3 an advantage when shooting low-light movies. In short, the new Xiaomi is an excellent all-rounder.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 96% display: 86% mobility: 86% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 96% display: 86% mobility: 86% workmanship: 80%
Source: Connect - 4/19
Single Review, , Long, Date: 03/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 86% features: 86% mobility: 99% ergonomy: 81%
Source: Connect - 4/19
Single Review, , Long, Date: 03/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 86% features: 86% mobility: 99% ergonomy: 81%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2019
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/20/2019
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/20/2019
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 96% display: 86% mobility: 82% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 96% display: 86% mobility: 82% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/14/2018
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/14/2018
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 95% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 95% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2018
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2018
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/26/2019
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/26/2019
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/12/2019
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/12/2019
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2019
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2019
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 95% display: 90% mobility: 78% workmanship: 85%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 95% display: 90% mobility: 78% workmanship: 85%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/30/2018
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/30/2018
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 90%
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/02/2019
Source: Tech Different IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 95% performance: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 95%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/02/2019
Source: Tech Different IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 95% performance: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 95%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2019
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2019
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/16/2019
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/16/2019
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/06/2019
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/06/2019
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 64% features: 89%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 64% features: 89%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 75% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 75% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 86% features: 97% display: 92% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 65%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 86% features: 97% display: 92% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 65%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2018
Source: Notebook Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2018
Source: Notebook Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2018
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/25/2019
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/25/2019
Source: Meilleurmobile FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Meilleurmobile FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Clubic FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Clubic FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2018
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 100% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 100% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2019
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2019
Source: Galaktyczny PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/30/2018
Source: Galaktyczny PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/30/2018
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 100% display: 70% mobility: 60%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 100% display: 70% mobility: 60%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Galaktyczny PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/28/2018
Source: Galaktyczny PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/28/2018
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/10/2019
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/10/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/05/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/05/2019
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2019
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2019
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2018
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2018
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/06/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/06/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: VNReview VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2019
Source: VNReview VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/14/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/14/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/28/2018
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/28/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/03/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/03/2018
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 100%
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 SE
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 SEProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 835
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 540
Display: 5.99 inch, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.187kg
Links:
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/09/2019
Xiaomi Mi Play
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi PlayProcessor: unknown
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 5.84 inch, 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.15kg
Price: 200 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Play does not fight the price/performance ratio but attracts users through additional selling points. It is still innovative, but if it is heavy use of mobile phones or game players, it is still necessary to consider carefully. At present, most of the Xiaomi Mi Play on the market are used as spare machines or as old-age machines. If you don’t use Xiaomi Play as a daily heavy-duty model, you can still start. Right now you can buy it from Geekbuying at 199.99usd for 4GB 64GB version with coupon code: ELCKWJOI
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/29/2018
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/11/2019
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/26/2018
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5G
Specifications
Notebook: Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5GProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 855
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 640
Display: 6.39 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.255kg
Price: 600 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Now, after half a year, although the existence of the national version, the release time, and the price have not been announced, but with the multiple factors such as the decline in component costs, and the rumored millet 9S 5G version on the road, Xiaomi Mi MIX 3 5G does not return Then, once the return is bound to give a surprising price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/08/2019
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you can get past the fact the Mi Mix 3 5G will accidentally slide open and start doing stuff when you take it out of your pocket every so often, it’s a great phone and among the most affordable 5G options around. Whether you need a 5G option is another conversation entirely.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As with all of the 5G phones we've reviewed, in isolation, the Mi Mix 5G is a great bit of kit, but the premium 5G adds is hard to justify until the service really takes off. We were only able to reach speeds of 250Mbps in our time with the phone, and we had to hunt for 5G in central London. And while we found EE to perform faster than Vodafone in general when we did have 5G signal in London, the service is in its infancy, and both networks are live in a handful of postcodes.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 5G is faster and has a higher-capacity battery than the standard Mi Mix 3, yet weighs only 8g more. And while Vodafone’s 5G network is patchy right now, by the time you’re even halfway through your 24-month contract we should be in a completely different situation in terms of coverage. But are you prepared to pay double dollar for the priviledge of future-proofed connectivity and slightly better performance on an already fast phone?
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 08/01/2019
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/16/2019
Comment
Xiaomi:
Qualcomm Adreno 405:
Qualcomm Adreno 418:
Qualcomm Adreno 330:
支持OpenGL ES 3.0标准的集成显卡。
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
Qualcomm Adreno 510:
基于Adreno 500架构的集成显卡,类似在骁龙820中的Adreno 520集成显卡。它的性能应该类似于较老的骁龙801中的Adreno 330。它支持DirectX12,OpenCL 2.0,OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE。
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
Qualcomm Adreno 509:
Qualcomm Adreno 430:
Qualcomm Adreno 530:
搭配于高通Snapdragon 820中的集成显卡,最大频率为624MHz。在2016年初它属于安卓系统智能手机/平板的高端显卡,可以运行需求很高的游戏。
Qualcomm Adreno 540:
高通骁龙835系统芯片中集成的图形卡。与Adreno 530相比,体系结构得到了优化,但由于采用了新的10纳米工艺,因此具有更高的时钟频率。在2017年初,安卓系统下的智能手机中最快的显卡芯片之一。
Qualcomm Adreno 630:
高通骁龙845 SoC中的集成显卡。据高通公司称,比旧款骁龙835中的Adreno 540快了30%,功耗降低30%。
Qualcomm Adreno 640:
适用于智能手机和平板电脑的图形芯片已集成在Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC中。 高通公司声称它比Snapdragon 845 SoC中的Adreno 630快20%,并提供了50%以上的计算单元(ALU)。
unknown:
Imagination PowerVR GE8320:
用于中档ARM SoC的集成显卡。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
820 MSM8996:
整合四核处理器(两颗2.15GHz高速核心以及两颗1.6GHz节能核心)和Adreno 530显卡的高端ARM系统芯片。使用14纳米HPM技术制造。
625:
中端八核处理器,搭配8个ARM Cortex-A53处理核心,频率最高2GHz,一颗Adreno 506显卡芯片,一个DDR3L-1866内存控制器和X9 LTE(Cat. 7)网络模组。采用最新的14纳米制程技术制造。
SD 845:
适用于智能手机的高端SoC,于2018年初推出,采用台积电的10 nm LPP FinFET制造。 集成了高性能2.8 GHz(最高)4x Kryo 385内核(Cortex-A75),和低功耗1.8 GHz(最高)4x Kryo 385内核,从而提高效率。 此外,还提供X20 LTE调制解调器,交流WiFi和双通道32位1866 MHz LPDDR4x内存控制器。
SD 636:
中档八核SoC,具有8个高达1.8 GHz的Kryo 260 CPU内核,Adreno 509 GPU,LPDDR4-2666内存控制器和X12 LTE(Cat 13 / 12,300 / 150 MBit)调制解调器。采用现代14nm工艺制造。
SD 855:
用于智能手机的高端SoC,于2018年末推出,以台积电(TSMC)7纳米制程生产。集成了一个基于改良的ARM Cortex-A76架构的``Prime Core'',频率高达2.84 GHz。另外三个基于A76的性能内核,但频率为2.42 GHz。此外,还集成了四个基于ARM Cortex-A55架构的节能内核,频率为1.8 GHz。除了处理器内核之外,SoC还集成了X24 LTE调制解调器(最多下载速度12 Gigbit),新的Wi-Fi调制解调器(支持Wi-Fi 6、60 GHz mmWave),Hexagon 690 DSP和用于AI处理的新Tensor内核。 ,一个Spectra 380 ISP,具有集成的计算机视觉引擎和集成的LPDDR4x存储器控制器。
Intel Atom x5:
:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.90:
这个屏幕尺寸介于智能手机和平板的边缘。大部分平板电脑都采用更大尺寸的屏幕,不过也有一些智能手机提供了这样大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
7.90:
这个屏幕尺寸对于平板电脑来说十分小。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
82.04%: No rating comment found (one expected)!
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.