Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

索尼 Xperia 1 VI - 电池续航能力出众的高端智能手机,摄影爱好者的首选

图片专家

索尼新推出的 Xperia I VI 高端智能手机几乎没有什么值得期待的地方:它配备了进一步改进的摄像头、更出色的性能、超长的电池续航时间以及亮度更高的全新 LTPO 显示屏。此外,它还再次提供了其他旗舰手机所不具备的功能。然而,它仍然面临着几个弱点。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

乍一看,索尼 Xperia 1 系列的第六代产品与上一代产品如出一辙。那么,索尼 Xperia 1 VI 是否一切如旧?不尽然,索尼今年的旗舰智能手机再次拥有了极其丰富的摄像头配置,而且与 Xperia 1 V 相比有了进一步的扩展。最重要的创新之一:在长焦镜头的帮助下,您现在可以连续变焦高达 7.1 倍,而不是 5.2 倍光学放大。

然而,它的显示屏却带来了一个大惊喜。在 Xperia 1 VI 上,索尼告别了标志性的 21:9 显示屏和特别窄的机身,而这正是迄今为止 Xperia 1 系列的特点。此外,它的显示屏分辨率也从 4K 降到了 FullHD+。不过,这款高端智能手机的价格依然没有变化,再次回到了 1300 美元左右。

Sony Xperia 1 VI (Xperia 1 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.50 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 396 PPI, capacitive, OLED, LTPO 1-120 Hz, FHD+, HDR10, HLG, 240 Hz touch sampling rate, Creator mode, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 227 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSDXC up to 1.5 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass, color spectrum, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66), 5G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78), Single SIM + eSIM, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 162 x 74
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 30W max. charging speed
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1/1.35" Exmor T for Mobile, f/1.9, 24mm, 84° FOV, 2,24µm pixel size, 12 MP pixel binning) + 12 MPix (1/1.35" Exmor RS, f/2.3-f/3.5, 85-170mm, 28°-15° FOV, 7.1x optical zoom, 1µm pixel size) + 12 MPix (1/2.5" Exmor RS, f/2.2, 16mm, 123° FOV, 1.4µm pixel size), videos up to 4K@120fps
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (1/2.9 Exmor RS, f/2.0, 24mm, 83° FOV, 1.22µm pixel size)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, quick start guide, warranty information, 24 Months Warranty, Camera2 API: Full, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 (front), Gorilla Glass Victus (backside), Dolby Atmos, DRM Widevine L1; IP6X, IPX5, IPX8; Head SAR 0.86 W/kg, Body SAR 0.76 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
192 g
Price
1399 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
86.3 %v8
08 / 2024
Sony Xperia 1 VI
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
192 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.50"2340x1080
91.1 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU
221 g256 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
89 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7
213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2992x1344
90.1 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Honor Magic5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
219 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.81"2848x1312
91.1 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750
232 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"3120x1440
89.9 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Sony Xperia 1 V
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
187 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.50"3840x1644
89.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Xiaomi 14 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
223 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440

外壳 - Xperia 1 VI 配有玻璃外壳和相机按钮

尽管长宽比有所改变,但新款索尼 Xperia 1 手机的重量同样很轻。尽管拥有 6.5 英寸的屏幕,Xperia 1 VI 192 克的重量仍是目前市场上最轻的高端手机之一。它只比 Xperia 1 V.它的制造质量一如既往地完美无瑕--没有任何晃动,没有任何吱吱作响,而且由于获得了 IP68 认证,它还具有防尘和防水功能。打开 SIM 卡/microSD 卡插槽仍然不需要工具。

总的来说,索尼没有改变这款高端手机的任何设计。金属框架将大猩猩胜利女神 2 号玻璃保护的 OLED 面板与大猩猩胜利女神玻璃制成的机壳背面连接在一起,三个相机镜头垂直排列在机壳背面。手机短边的边框相对较宽。这至少在顶部是合理的,因为自拍摄像头被隐藏在边框内。

后盖表面纹理细腻,手感像塑料,但也能在很大程度上防止指纹沾染。除了我们测试设备的枸杞黑配色外,保护套背面还有卡其色铂银色

Xperia 1 VI 继承了前代产品的专用拍照按钮,位于右侧,非常方便。在标准设置下,该按钮可启动相机应用程序,然后用作快门按钮。此外,Xperia 1 VI 还配备了 3.5 毫米插孔,这在几乎所有其他高端智能手机上都找不到。

索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI

尺寸比较

165 mm 71 mm 8.3 mm 187 g162.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.77 mm 219 g162.6 mm 76.5 mm 8.8 mm 213 g162.3 mm 79 mm 8.6 mm 232 g162 mm 74 mm 8.2 mm 192 g161.4 mm 75.3 mm 8.49 mm 223 g159.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.25 mm 221 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 最大存储容量为 256 GB

Xperia 1 VI 拥有多种连接选项。除了 3.5 毫米插孔和立体声扬声器外,它还提供 NFC、蓝牙 5.4、支持 USB OTG、通过 Miracast 和 Google Cast 传输流媒体,并能通过 "共享电池 "功能为其他兼容 Qi 的设备充电。这款智能手机还可以连接索尼阿尔法相机,用作相机监视器。

索尼只提供一种存储配置的旗舰智能手机,这在高端领域并不多见。这款高端手机配备 12GB LPDDR5X 内存和 256GB UFS 4.0 存储空间,售价约为 1300 美元。制造商已经为 Xperia 1 V-也没有其他存储配置。手机的内部存储空间可通过 microSD 卡扩展,最大容量可达 1.5 TB,也可以 exFAT 文件格式格式化。

Xperia 1 VI 的 USB 端口以 USB 3.2 Gen 1 的速度(5 GBit/s)连接,允许智能手机使用相应的 USB-C 转 HDMI 或 DisplayPort 连接线连接到外部显示器或电视。它最高支持 4K 分辨率,每秒 60 帧。在我们使用三星 980 Pro 作为外置硬盘进行的复制测试中,USB 端口仅实现了 202 MByte/s 的一般传输速率。

左:无连接
左:无连接
右:相机按钮、带指纹传感器的电源按钮、音量摇杆
右:相机按钮、带指纹传感器的电源按钮、音量摇杆
顶部:麦克风,3.5 毫米插孔
顶部:麦克风,3.5 毫米插孔
底部:nano SIM 卡/microSD 插槽、麦克风、USB-C 3.2 Gen 1
底部:nano SIM 卡/microSD 插槽、麦克风、USB-C 3.2 Gen 1

microSD 读卡器

Xperia 1 VI 的 microSD 读卡器只能提供与 Xperia 1 V 大致相当的平庸传输速率。 Xperia 1 V.使用我们的 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考卡时,其连续读取和写入速率都很稳定,但平均值分别仅为 43.3 MB/s 和 28.4 MB/s。在复制测试中,我们记录的数据吞吐量为 17.7 MByte/s。在这两项测试中,中端智能手机有时能达到明显更高的速度。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
18.35 MB/s +4%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
17.69 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Sony Xperia 1 VI Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø28.4 (21.4-32.8)
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø28.3 (19.6-31.9)
Sony Xperia 1 VI Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø43.3 (17.9-92.8)
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø45.7 (28.7-176.3)

软件 -Android 14 和 4 年更新

Xperia 1 VI 运行Android 14,索尼在其中加入了自己的索尼 UI 用户界面。只预装了少量第三方应用程序。不过,你无法通过板载工具将它们全部删除。例如,Facebook 只能停用,而不能卸载。

在运行索尼 UI 时,Xperia 1 VI 的Android 14 与原版Android 几乎没有什么不同,但它提供了一个实用的额外功能,即仪表盘。仪表盘允许用户快速访问常用的手机设置,如显示亮度、图片和音频模式或通知。仪表盘通过右侧的侧边栏打开。

索尼承诺为 Xperia 1 VI 提供三次操作系统升级,以及 4 年的安全更新。与 Xperia 1 V相比,索尼只为 Xperia 1 V 提供了 2 次操作系统升级和 3 年的安全更新。另一方面,与Apple 、谷歌和三星的其他高端手机相比,这种扩展支持仍然很差。例如 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra提供 7 年更新。

索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI

可持续性

Xperia 1 VI 的产品包装由竹子、甘蔗和再生纸制成,独立包装完全不使用塑料。索尼还用纸张替代了用于密封运输箱的塑料胶带,使包装更加环保。

据制造商称,用于制造智能手机主机的一系列内部和外部元件的原材料中,约有 85% 是环保型树脂,如回收树脂和植物性树脂。索尼开发的 SORPLAS(可持续定向再生塑料)也被用于该机型。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 将通过更新跟进

索尼 Xperia 1 VI 支持多种移动电话频段,包括 24 个 4G 频段和 13 个 5G 频段,因此能够在全球范围内建立连接。在短距离内,智能手机通过 WiFi 6E 进行通信。计划在秋季通过固件更新升级到 WiFi 7。

现在,Xperia 1 VI 的 Wi-Fi 上网速度已经非常快了。索尼智能手机与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器连接后,传输速率很高而且相当稳定,但不能完全发挥其 WiFi 调制解调器的全部功能。

Networking
Sony Xperia 1 VI
iperf3 receive AXE11000
792 (min: 399) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
879 (min: 842) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1824 (min: 1765) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1438 (min: 1193) MBit/s ∼83%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
931 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1345 (min: 1298) MBit/s ∼78%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼85%
Honor Magic5 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1531 (min: 1445) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1474 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
801 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
556 (min: 253) MBit/s ∼31%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1553 (min: 815) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1461 (min: 1284) MBit/s ∼84%
Sony Xperia 1 V
iperf3 receive AXE11000
818 (min: 410) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
946 (min: 912) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1778 (min: 891) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1530 (min: 1492) MBit/s ∼88%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1717 (min: 1627) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1783 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1728 (min: 1374) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1731 (min: 1657) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼80%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Sony Xperia 1 VI Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1824 (1765-1873)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, Apple A17 Pro GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1534 (1415-1573)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1526 (815-1800)
Sony Xperia 1 VI Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1437 (1193-1525)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, Apple A17 Pro GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1344 (1298-1361)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1461 (1284-1543)
Sony Xperia 1 VI Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø778 (399-806)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, Apple A17 Pro GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø809 (793-818)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø786 (397-819)
Sony Xperia 1 VI Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø879 (842-911)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, Apple A17 Pro GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø931 (893-949)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (253-611)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收

Xperia 1 VI 在单频模式下使用卫星导航服务 GPS、Glonass、Galileo、Beidou 和 QZSS 确定位置。在静止状态下,无论我们是在室内还是室外,这款智能手机都能以最多 3 米的精度确定我们的位置。

这款旗舰手机非常适合导航。与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表相比,它对我们 10 公里自行车骑行路线的记录可能并不总是那么准确,但它从未真正失准过。

GPS 测试:总结
GPS 测试:总结
GPS 测试:环湖旅行
GPS 测试:环湖旅行
GPS 测试:转折点
GPS 测试:转折点

电话功能和通话质量 - 带有 eSIM 卡的双 SIM 卡

将索尼智能手机放在耳边时,通话质量很好。在我们的测试中,通话双方都能听清对方的声音,而且声音传递得很自然。即使使用免提模式,Xperia 1 VI 也能有效抑制环境噪音。

除 VoLTE 外,索尼手机还支持 WLAN 通话。如果插入一张 nano SIM 卡并配置额外的 eSIM 卡,Xperia 1 VI 还可以在双 SIM 卡模式下使用。

相机 - 焦距从 24 毫米到 170 毫米

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

Xperia 1 VI 配备了与 Xperia 1 V 相同的蔡司镜头摄像头。 Xperia 1 V的蔡司镜头,但有一个例外。手机后置摄像头底部的 OIS 远摄变焦功能已经更新,现在的光圈为 f/2.3-f/3.5,焦距范围为 85 至 170 毫米(以前为 f/2.3-f/2.8,85 至 125 毫米)。

借助新的远摄变焦功能,用户可以在 3.5 倍和 7.1 倍光学放大率之间进行选择(Xperia 1 V:最大 5.2 倍)。同样新颖的是:远摄变焦现在还可用于微距拍摄。与 Xperia 1 V 相比,图像传感器的分辨率和尺寸保持不变(Exmor RS、1200 万像素、1/1.35 英寸)。

该机型的长焦变焦摄像头在成像质量方面无法与其他镜头相提并论,但它拍摄的照片清晰度不错。即便如此,在与 Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro的直接对比中,它只排在第三位。

主摄像头位于长焦变焦上方,继续使用 Exmor T for Mobile(1/1.35")传感器。它的分辨率为 5200 万像素,其中有效像素为 4800 万像素。光学防抖主摄像头采用 4 合 1 像素分选技术,可拍摄出 1200 万像素的照片,小画幅等效焦距为 24 毫米(f/1.9)。如果需要更大的分辨率,也可以使用 4800 万像素全像素拍照。此外,您还可以采用经典的 3:2 长宽比(4000 x 2666 像素)进行拍摄。

位于三摄像头顶端的超广角摄像头可覆盖 123° 的视场角(Exmor RS、1/2.5 英寸、f/2.2、16 毫米),可提供更广泛的焦距选择,在此价格范围内提供高于平均水平的性能。

使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片

专业模式下的最佳图像质量

4800 万像素主摄像头拥有超大感光元件,是三部相机中拍照效果最好的,在自动模式下,其漂亮逼真的色彩描绘给人留下了深刻印象。索尼从 Alpha 相机中引入的 AI 自动对焦眼球和肢体跟踪功能在实际使用中也非常出色。

在标准拍照模式下,相机会自动进行所有设置,我们也使用该模式进行了测试拍摄,照片质量始终非常出色。另一方面,其效果与同类产品相比也并不出色。在弱光环境下,主摄像头无法与 iPhone 15 Pro Max 的镜头相媲美。 Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max的镜头相差甚远。

索尼手机只有在使用相机应用中的专业模式时才能发挥其拍照极限,该模式提供了大量的设置和优化选项,可对拍照对象进行微调。您还可以在这里找到 RAW 图像格式、连拍或视频的 S-Cinetone 色彩模式等选项。专业视频模式允许更详细的视频设置,将在更新中添加。据新闻稿称,这 "预计将在下一次Android OS 版本更新时实现",因此大概会在秋季。

Xperia 1 VI 的自拍摄像头分辨率为 1200 万像素(Exmor RS for Mobile,1/2.9",f/2.0,24 毫米,83°),画质稳定。它最高能以每秒 30 帧的速度录制 4K 视频。使用主摄像头,每秒可拍摄高达 120 帧的 4K 视频。在录制过程中,在单个镜头之间切换只能达到 4K 60fps。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo

在我们测试实验室的可控光线条件下,索尼手机的主摄像头显示出它能够准确捕捉色彩。在最佳照明条件下,它还能清晰地捕捉测试图表。在 1 勒克斯的残余光线下,测试图表和 ColorChecker 色彩图表依然清晰可见,但相机在对焦显示这两个图表时却遇到了相当大的困难。

ColorChecker
7.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Sony Xperia 1 VI: 6.04 ∆E min: 2.76 - max: 9.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.1 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Sony Xperia 1 VI: 17 ∆E min: 10.6 - max: 23.79 ∆E

配件和保修 - 一切费用另计

事实证明,索尼在其旗舰智能手机方面相当吝啬。包装中既没有相应的 30 瓦电源适配器,也没有 USB-C 连接线,只有一份快速入门指南和一本安全说明手册。

在测试时,Xperia 1 VI 有三个可选的官方配件:一个带集成支架的盖子、一个 30 瓦的电源适配器和一个视频监视器,所有这些都可以直接从制造商处购买。

索尼 Xperia 1 VI 在美国享有 24 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 配备指纹传感器的 Xperia 1 VI

Xperia 1 VI 的电容式触摸屏以 240 Hz 的采样率工作,能非常快速、准确地处理输入。得益于其高端 SoC 和 12GB RAM,智能手机不会因要求苛刻的应用程序或同时打开多个应用程序而运行缓慢。线性振动电机可提供精确反馈。

由于屏幕格式从以前的 21:9 改为 19.5:9 长宽比,全屏显示的视频(通常为 16:9)仍会出现黑条。不过,它们不再像 Xperia 1 V.

电容式指纹传感器解锁智能手机非常可靠,即使关闭显示屏也能正常工作。这款手机没有面部识别等其他生物识别认证选项。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - 120 赫兹 LTPO-OLED 面板

子像素
子像素

索尼推出的 Xperia 1 V 的独特卖点之一是 Xperia 1 V的独特卖点之一。Xperia 1 VI 现在使用的是 19.5:9 格式,长宽比不再是以前的 21:9,4K 面板也被缩减为分辨率为 2340 x 1080 像素的 FullHD+。因此,其像素密度从 643 PPI 降至 396 PPI,但画面锐度仍然不错。我们的测试表明,屏幕分辨率的降低对手机的电池续航时间有非常积极的影响。

与 Xperia 1 V 不同,Xperia 1 VI 安装的 OLED 面板可在 1 到 120 Hz 的范围内动态调整刷新率。除 HDR10 外,它还支持 HLG。在激活环境光传感器的情况下,我们测得显示白色背景时的平均亮度为 1319 cd/m²。这使得显示屏的亮度明显高于 Xperia 1 V,与 Xperia 1 V 大致相同。 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra.当显示均匀分布的亮暗图像区域时(APL18 测量),OLED 面板的亮度最高可达 1862 cd/m²。

OLED 显示屏的闪烁频率并不高,我们在所有亮度水平下测得的频率都在 240 Hz 左右。对显示屏闪烁敏感的用户在这方面可能会有一些抱怨。

1317
cd/m²
1304
cd/m²
1328
cd/m²
1318
cd/m²
1305
cd/m²
1324
cd/m²
1328
cd/m²
1310
cd/m²
1336
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1336 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1318.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.31 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1305 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Sony Xperia 1 VI
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"
Google Pixel 8 Pro
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.7"
Honor Magic5 Pro
OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8"
Sony Xperia 1 V
AMOLED, 3840x1644, 6.5"
Xiaomi 14 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
8%
13%
-12%
-22%
1%
-1%
Brightness middle
1305
1102
-16%
1510
16%
1291
-1%
1317
1%
934
-28%
1025
-21%
Brightness
1319
1102
-16%
1467
11%
1289
-2%
1365
3%
948
-28%
1046
-21%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
92
-6%
96
-2%
94
-4%
96
-2%
95
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.8
1.1
61%
1.1
61%
1.7
39%
3.4
-21%
1.5
46%
1.1
61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.5
3.1
31%
3.8
16%
4.4
2%
5
-11%
4
11%
2.9
36%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
1.6
-14%
1.7
-21%
2.9
-107%
2.8
-100%
1.3
7%
2.2
-57%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.19 100%
2.23 99%
2.28 96%
2 110%
2.2 100%
2.25 98%
CCT
6361 102%
6555 99%
6670 97%
6472 100%
6458 101%
6384 102%
6622 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz
Amplitude: 28.85 %

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。

卡尔曼测量显示设置
卡尔曼测量显示设置

使用标准图像模式,OLED 面板的色彩校准效果不错。一些 RGB 色调并不完美,但在日常使用中应该不会很明显。除标准 模式外,还有第二种图像模式可供选择,即创作者模式,该模式使用更大的 BT.2020 色彩空间,而不是 DCI-P3 色彩空间,并针对 10 位色深的 HDR 播放进行了优化。

创作者模式还可用作选定应用程序的标准模式。在这两种模式下都可以进行手动白平衡。截图显示了我们的手动白平衡设置。

色彩准确度(标准模式、手动白平衡、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩准确度(标准模式、手动白平衡、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(标准模式、手动白平衡、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(标准模式、手动白平衡、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(标准模式、手动白平衡、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(标准模式、手动白平衡、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(标准模式、手动白平衡、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(标准模式、手动白平衡、目标色彩空间 sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7195 ms rise
↘ 0.583 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.555 ms rise
↘ 1.641 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Xperia 1 VI 在户外也能很好地使用。视角稳定的 OLED 面板的高亮度通常足以保证良好的辨识度。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 配备骁龙 8 代 3 处理器的 Xperia 1 VI

Xperia 1 VI 配备了 骁龙 8 代 3是目前Android 智能手机中速度最快的处理器之一。时钟稍高的 骁龙 8 代 3Galaxy处理器。 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra的性能甚至更好。

在 CPU 和 GPU 基准测试中,索尼 Xperia 1 VI 与三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 和 小米 14 Pro争夺最高分和最短时间。iPhone Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro在 Geekbench 6.2 和 AImark 中的表现偶尔会好于三者。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2930 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2278 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2250 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (954 - 2329, n=21)
2106 Points -6%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1985 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1774 Points -21%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1769 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7244 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6875 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6804 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4564 - 7501, n=21)
6638 Points -2%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5119 Points -25%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4538 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4255 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points -39%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1716 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1697 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1687 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1343 - 1702, n=14)
1652 Points -3%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1486 Points -12%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1274 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -39%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6439 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6426 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6125 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5393 - 6543, n=14)
6058 Points -1%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4846 Points -21%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3624 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -43%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1390723 - 2162423, n=17)
1934946 Points +7%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1905751 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1837994 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1812093 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1487075 Points -18%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1398472 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points -28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1113506 Points -39%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18672 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (12156 - 21628, n=20)
17861 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17281 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15876 Points -8%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15550 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
11824 Points -32%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1443 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1408 Points +4%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1350 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (983 - 1474, n=13)
1238 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1224 Points -9%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1167 Points -14%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
992 Points -27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
935 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -32%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8148 - 10966, n=16)
9947 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
9940 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9696 Points -2%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
9585 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points -35%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
16475 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16015 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8611 - 16015, n=16)
13995 Points -13%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
13642 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -35%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (7426 - 12716, n=16)
10611 Points +25%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10467 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
10389 Points +23%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8474 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points -17%
Graphics
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
37597 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (26972 - 39727, n=16)
34142 Points -9%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
29649 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
27905 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points -52%
Web
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1994 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1661 - 2145, n=16)
1962 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1913 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1815 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points -18%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
27018 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18852 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18266 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points -2%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16988 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (11487 - 18370, n=15)
16446 Points -10%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
11338 Points -38%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (963 - 245629, n=14)
101518 Points +7591%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
29087 Points +2104%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +1818%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1518 Points +15%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1320 Points
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1266 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1109 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1067 Points -19%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1317 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1141 - 1342, n=6)
1227 Points +7%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1142 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points -28%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1305 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1070 - 1478, n=6)
1301 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1254 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points -43%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
678 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points +4%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
621 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (378 - 663, n=6)
555 Points -11%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4804 Points +10%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4381 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3879 Points -11%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3595 Points -18%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points -45%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5040 Points +13%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4458 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3765 Points -16%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3687 Points -17%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -46%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20068 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19022 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
15260 Points -20%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13827 Points -27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points -53%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7697 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7510 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6478 Points -16%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5329 Points -31%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8620 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8360 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6106 Points -27%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5271 Points -37%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps -3%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
549 fps +5%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
543 fps +4%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
522 fps
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
444 fps -15%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps -33%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
301 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps -17%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
362 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
339 fps +6%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
320 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
262 fps -18%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
260 fps -19%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps -46%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps -64%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps -2%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -4%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -43%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps +5%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
256 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps -4%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
206 fps -20%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
180 fps -30%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -56%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps -58%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps -30%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -40%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -42%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
155 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps -8%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps -19%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
110 fps -29%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps -43%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -52%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps -35%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps -40%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -43%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -47%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
55 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps +5%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps -12%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
61 fps -25%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -54%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -70%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps -5%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -9%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps -24%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -51%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 fps -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
203 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps -8%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps -39%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
117 fps -42%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -52%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps -60%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps +5%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps -18%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps -21%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
25 fps -34%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -58%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1629 Points +19%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1369 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1796 Points +14%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1570 Points

在网上冲浪时,索尼 Xperia 1 VI 一点也不示弱。网页加载迅速,显示迅速,没有任何卡顿。不过,在基准测试中,第一名是 Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max超越了Android 。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
254.048 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
209.919 Points +15%
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
183.071 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
162.564 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=19)
152.3 Points -17%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
143.878 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -32%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
116.696 Points -36%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
105.175 Points -43%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
445 runs/min +65%
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
270 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
265 runs/min -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.6 - 311, n=16)
207 runs/min -23%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
168 runs/min -38%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
158 runs/min -41%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min -47%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
141 runs/min -48%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
111 runs/min -59%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
195 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
189 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
181 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
166 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=15)
161.7 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points -38%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
103 Points -46%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
98 Points -48%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
304 Points +36%
Sony Xperia 1 V
235 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
223 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
218 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (142 - 310, n=9)
208 Points -7%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
198 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points -33%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
129 Points -42%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
86270 Points +19%
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
72665 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
72011 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
60007 Points -17%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
54365 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=19)
50413 Points -31%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
49506 Points -32%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
39825 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -151%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
981.4 ms * -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (546 - 2066, n=16)
841 ms * -39%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
840.2 ms * -39%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
801.6 ms * -32%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
701.7 ms * -16%
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
606.4 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
599 ms * +1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
388.3 ms * +36%

* ... smaller is better

Xperia 1 VI 的 UFS 4.0 存储系统具有很高的数据吞吐量,可确保极短的加载时间。在同类设备中,没有一款能达到这样的写入和读取性能。

Sony Xperia 1 VIGoogle Pixel 8 ProHonor Magic5 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 UltraAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-70%
-32%
-31%
-19%
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
3804.21
1501.13
-61%
3344.12
-12%
3610.25
-5%
Sequential Write 256KB
3348.35
257.28
-92%
2651.87
-21%
1893.63
-43%
2530 ?(555 - 3348, n=26)
-24%
Random Read 4KB
446.31
156.16
-65%
267.91
-40%
437.12
-2%
Random Write 4KB
681.02
258.92
-62%
298.31
-56%
181.55
-73%

游戏 - 保证游戏流畅

对于骁龙 8 代 3 及其集成的 Adreno 750GPU 可以流畅地呈现当前的游戏。我们的两款测试游戏《PUBG Mobile》和《Genshin Impact》即使在最高细节设置下也能流畅运行。遗憾的是,由于索尼 Xperia 1 VI 无法向我们的Gamebench测试工具提供任何数据。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile

排放 - 负载时节流

温度

Xperia 1 VI 在空闲模式下保持良好的冷却状态。不过,在 "Burnout "基准测试中,它的温度高达 44.4 °C,感觉相当热。即便如此,在 1 小时的测试中,它的表面温度始终保持在热安全范围内,既没有过热警告,也没有发生死机。

此外,我们还使用 3DMark 压力测试来检查智能手机的 CPU 和 GPU 性能在持续负载下的表现。在所有测试场景中,其帧频在开始后不久就崩溃了,有时在测试结束时还不到初始值的 50%。这并不罕见,因为其他配备了 骁龙 8 代 3在负载情况下也会大幅降低性能。在这次对比中,其他高端 SoC 的情况看起来也没有什么不同。

Max. Load
 43.6 °C41.6 °C39.1 °C 
 44.1 °C41.2 °C38.8 °C 
 44.4 °C42.3 °C35.5 °C 
Maximum: 44.4 °C
Average: 41.2 °C
38.8 °C40 °C43.3 °C
38 °C42.1 °C44.2 °C
34.6 °C38 °C43.5 °C
Maximum: 44.2 °C
Average: 40.3 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
78.9 % +52%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 % +52%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 %
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.1 % -11%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40.8 % -22%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % +48%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.4 % +27%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.4 % +10%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51.5 %
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.9 % -9%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.1 % +63%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
66.1 % +58%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.9 % +29%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.9 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.6 % +18%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.1 %
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Sony Xperia 1 VI Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.1 (14.5-28.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.3 (17.6-31.2)
Sony Xperia 1 VI Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø58.5 (45.8-88.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø61 (47.5-102.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø87.8 (72-121.8)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.1 (16.3-31.3)
Sony Xperia 1 VI Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø18 (11-26.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø17.6 (13.8-25.6)
Sony Xperia 1 VI Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø8.8 (8.22-12.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø9.47 (9.01-11.8)
索尼 Xperia 1 VI
索尼 Xperia 1 VI

发言人

Xperia 1 VI 内置的两个杜比全景声和360 Reality Audio-Xperia 1 VI 内置的经过认证的立体声扬声器可以发出相对响亮的声音,整体听起来相当平衡。与大多数其他智能手机一样,它的声音组合中明显缺乏低音。

耳机和其他外置音频设备可通过蓝牙 5.4 或 3.5 毫米插孔与索尼智能手机无线连接。后者可提供 80.97 dBFS(信噪比)的低噪音播放。Xperia 1 VI 支持 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、Opus、LDAC 和 LC3 等多种蓝牙编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.837.62530.835.73125.527.34021.525.85031.333.96328.226.78016.535.910018.839.91251646.516017.954.920015.956.825015.558.531516.362.74001464.650015.374.563015.476.98001576.9100015.276.4125014.274.716001573.6200014.275.6250014.275.5315015.578.4400014.280.2500014.175.6630015.574800014.469.51000014.166.11250015.763.21600014.159.9SPL26.987.9N0.875.1median 15.2median 74Delta0.86.636.246.130.739.625.643.926.742.836.743.624.644.317.64618.743.218.245.715.956.617.356.115.260.214.160.413.461.313.866.514.367.713.774.912.478.112.778.612.177.212.981.612.584.612.284.112.88413.18413.578.513.176.913.7741466.813.36425.2930.792.2median 13.5median 74.91.210.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia 1 VISamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia 1 VI audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 难以耗尽

耗电量

在充电速度方面,Xperia 1 VI 与其他旗舰智能手机有很大不同,因为它的最大充电功率被限制在 30 瓦,就像 Xperia 1 V.理想情况下,一个完整的充电周期应在 1.5 小时内完成。另外,Xperia 1 VI 可以使用兼容 Qi 的充电器以最高 15 瓦的功率充电。

我们的充电器(100 瓦的 Anker 317 和 65 瓦的 Ugreen 2C1A)与智能手机的配合并不是最好的,因为它们的最大功率不是 30 瓦,而是都无法超过 22 瓦。不过,充电速度并不慢,我们测得的充电时间为 1:33 小时(Anker 317)。充电到 50%需要 37 分钟,一小时后达到 80%。

在负载情况下,它的功耗并不特别高效,但在闲置模式下功耗很低。总体而言,Xperia 1 VI 的运行能效远高于对比设备。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.12 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.4 / 0.81 / 0.85 Watt
Load midlight 9.25 / 14.99 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia 1 VI
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh
Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh
Honor Magic5 Pro
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia 1 V
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-42%
-34%
-37%
-56%
-114%
-28%
-39%
-45%
Idle Minimum *
0.4
0.5
-25%
0.63
-58%
0.91
-128%
0.73
-83%
1.52
-280%
0.89
-123%
0.859 ?(0.4 - 1.5, n=15)
-115%
Idle Average *
0.81
1.97
-143%
1.47
-81%
1.63
-101%
1.22
-51%
2.16
-167%
1.05
-30%
1.231 ?(0.81 - 1.9, n=15)
-52%
Idle Maximum *
0.85
1.99
-134%
1.55
-82%
1.67
-96%
1.34
-58%
2.2
-159%
1.11
-31%
1.363 ?(0.85 - 2.6, n=15)
-60%
Load Average *
9.25
3.36
64%
8.45
9%
2.61
72%
16.52
-79%
7.85
15%
9.03
2%
Load Maximum *
14.99
10.43
30%
8.63
42%
4.57
70%
16.58
-11%
11.57
23%
9.06
40%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Sony Xperia 1 VI Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.19 (0.62-13)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.63 (0.966-16.1)
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.2 (0.783-8.97)
Sony Xperia 1 VI Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.511 (0.4597-0.935)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.98 (0.924-1.218)
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.732 (0.686-0.884)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Sony Xperia 1 VI Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.56 (6.28-7.31)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.1 (9.83-15.6)
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.87 (7.63-8.96)
Sony Xperia 1 VI Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.511 (0.4597-0.935)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.98 (0.924-1.218)
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.732 (0.686-0.884)

运行时间

Xperia 1 VI 电池续航时间出色,明显优于 Xperia 1 V。 Xperia 1 V的续航时间。这一优势主要得益于其分辨率的降低(FullHD+ 而不是 4K)和改用 LTPO OLED 面板,这可以将手机的刷新率降至 1 Hz。

在实际的 WLAN 测试中,Xperia 1 VI 的续航时间约为 21 小时,在相同条件下连续循环播放视频时,续航时间甚至达到了近 31 小时。因此,即使大量使用 Xperia 1 VI,也能轻松获得两天或更长的电池续航时间。在对比设备中,只有 Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max能跟上,而其他竞争产品有时会被远远甩在后面。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
85h 43min
WiFi Websurfing
21h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
30h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 13min
Sony Xperia 1 VI
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh
Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh
Honor Magic5 Pro
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia 1 V
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh
Battery Runtime
5%
-42%
-22%
-21%
-56%
-34%
Reader / Idle
5143
3514
-32%
1344
-74%
2580
-50%
2227
-57%
1321
-74%
1998
-61%
H.264
1850
2013
9%
1122
-39%
1249
-32%
1922
4%
859
-54%
1437
-22%
WiFi v1.3
1267
1163
-8%
760
-40%
1074
-15%
1148
-9%
743
-41%
897
-29%
Load
253
384
52%
220
-13%
276
9%
202
-20%
189
-25%

Pros

+ 多功能摄像系统,可连续变焦
+ 超长运行时间
+ 明亮的 LTPO-OLED 面板
+ 功能丰富
+ 高品质制造
+ 快速 SoC
+ 防尘防水

Cons

- 不附带电源和 USB-C 连接线
- 充电功率低
- 只有一种存储配置
- 更新时间相对较短

索尼 Xperia 1 VI 的评价

索尼 Xperia 1 VI 评测。测试设备由索尼奥地利公司提供。
索尼 Xperia 1 VI 评测。测试设备由索尼奥地利公司提供。

在顶级智能手机中,索尼 Xperia 1 VI 对于内容创作者、业余摄影爱好者和专业摄影师来说是一款特别的产品,甚至可能是目前最有趣的旗舰手机。

Xperia 1 VI 的摄像系统进一步升级,焦距范围扩大到 24 至 170 毫米,还可选配 vlog 监视器等配件,并可将其用作索尼阿尔法相机的摄像监视器。

索尼 Xperia 1 VI 凭借其专业的相机功能在高端市场独树一帜,但并不适合休闲摄影师。只有在手动更改所有相机设置时,它才能充分发挥潜力。

索尼决定放弃 Xperia 1 V的 4K 显示屏,转而采用分辨率为 FullHD+ 的 LTPO 面板,这一决定最初似乎是一种倒退。不过,总的来说,Xperia 1 VI 显然从中受益匪浅,因为它的电池续航时间大大延长了,在图像清晰度方面没有什么可抱怨的,显示屏的亮度也提高了很多。得益于 骁龙 8 代 3,手机的性能也是如此。

另一方面,Xperia 1 VI 不太适合 "点拍 "摄影师。任何只想按下手机快门键就能拍出好照片的人都不会对索尼智能手机感到失望。不过,在自动模式下,它的照片质量并不比Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 或三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 好多少。归根结底,Xperia 1 VI 的相机取决于使用专业模式对最后一个细节的手动配置。只有这样才能达到最佳效果。

Xperia 1 VI 还存在一些与前代 Xperia 1 相同的缺点。例如,短边的边框仍然很厚,充电速度慢,可用存储空间不超过 256 GB。与 Xperia 1 V 相比,它的更新时间有所延长,但与竞争对手相比,充其量只能算一般。其雄心勃勃的建议零售价约为 1,300 美元,这也可能让一些买家望而却步。

索尼 Xperia 1 VI 的替代品包括其他旗舰智能手机,如Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max、三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 和Xiaomi 14 Pro

价格和供应情况

截至发稿时,索尼 Xperia 1 VI 可通过亚马逊等在线零售商购买,目前售价约为1,170 美元

请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.

Sony Xperia 1 VI - 08/05/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
65 / 69 → 94%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
32 / 55 → 58%
Application Performance
73 / 85 → 86%
AI Performance
58%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
86%
Average
72%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
100%
Power Use
98.2%
Repairability
45%
Software Updates
61.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 59.1%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 索尼 Xperia 1 VI - 电池续航能力出众的高端智能手机,摄影爱好者的首选
Manuel Masiero, 2024-08- 8 (Update: 2024-08-15)