Notebookcheck Logo

联想Yoga Tab 13平板电脑评测--拥有强大音效的多媒体平板电脑

好久没见了。

在联想的Yoga Tab系列中,其标志性的电池筒和内置脚架已经安静了很久,但现在它又回来了。Yoga Tab 13是否能够重新点燃吸引联想多媒体平板电脑的旧火焰,Android?
Android ARM Tablet
联想Yoga Tab 13

几年前,联想以其不寻常的Yoga Tabs搅动了已经变得有点陈旧的平板电脑市场。乍一看,其独特的形状和底部边缘的电池圆筒看起来不实用,但在日常使用中却变成了一个好主意。首先,它提供了一个握住平板电脑的好方法,其次,它为联想提供了一个连接内置脚架的铰链的地方。

有几个型号甚至包括一个内置的投影仪,变成了一个奢侈的,但经过深思熟虑的,替代无处不在的iPad的产品。

一段时间以来,新的联想Yoga Tab 13一直是延续设计传统的新平板电脑,尤其是注定要用于多媒体任务。4个JBL扬声器,2K显示屏,以及一个强大的处理器,据说也适合游戏,联想正试图说服娱乐爱好者。

另一方面,你也必须为此付出高昂的代价。联想为其平板电脑要价749欧元(约合878美元)。这值得吗?

Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Yoga Tab Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 8 x 2.4 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
13.00 inch 16:10, 2160 x 1350 pixel 196 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, position sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.2 x 293.35 x 203.98
Battery
10000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 4 JBL speakers Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
830 g
Price
730 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.2 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
SD 870, Adreno 650
830 g6.2 mm13.00"2160x1350
91.3 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2021
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1, M1 8-Core GPU
682 g6.4 mm12.90"2732x2048
88.4 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2020
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
460 g7.2 mm10.80"2560x1600
85.8 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
608 g6.3 mm12.40"2560x1600

箱子 - 不寻常且符合人体工程学

外壳的特殊形状是Yoga Tab系列的显著特征。在其中一个长边上有一个圆柱形的凸起,它为一些特殊的东西提供了空间。它容纳了集成不锈钢脚架的铰链,可以让你支撑起平板电脑,甚至挂在墙上,提供良好的稳定性。然后,联想还将额外的空间用于放置更多的扬声器,一个微型HDMI端口,以及更多的电池容量。

这在人机工程学方面意味着什么。实际上,圆柱形的凸起在这里也成为一种优势。它提供了一个良好的抓地力,可以非常安全地用一只手握住平板电脑。在横向操作中,它还可以放在食指上作为额外的安全保障。如果你把平板电脑放在桌子上,显示屏将总是略微倾斜,这使得在虚拟键盘上打字更容易。

唯一的缺点是,由于其不寻常的设计,这款平板电脑需要在你的包里增加空间。它也明显比同类机型重。830克(约1.83磅)是相当可观的,有了这个,我们的测试装置的重量与超移动的笔记本,如联想ThinkPad X1 Nano等超移动笔记本相差不大,而联想ThinkPad X1 Nano又带来了明显更多的性能和电池容量。

在材料方面,联想在前面使用大猩猩玻璃3。尽管这提供了一些保护,使显示屏不至于破碎,但它也已经有几年的历史了。考虑到显示屏的价格和尺寸,我们希望看到一个稍微新一点的,同时也更坚固的保护玻璃。 外壳由铝制成,上半部分和背面由Alcantara织物覆盖。这提供了一个有吸引力的表面,但也吸引了灰尘。

对于像Yoga Tab 13这样的大型平板电脑,稳定性当然是至关重要的。虽然压力不会到达屏幕,但平板电脑可以翘起来,在右下角的音量摇杆区域,外壳可以相当容易地与显示屏分开几毫米,伴随着一些明显的吱吱声。 这在日常操作中不是什么大问题,但它减少了我们对质量的印象。

联想Yoga Tab 13
联想Yoga Tab 13
联想Yoga Tab 13
联想Yoga Tab 13
联想Yoga Tab 13
联想Yoga Tab 13
联想Yoga Tab 13
联想Yoga Tab 13

Size Comparison

293.35 mm 203.98 mm 6.2 mm 830 g284.8 mm 185 mm 6.3 mm 608 g280.6 mm 214.9 mm 6.4 mm 682 g246 mm 159 mm 7.2 mm 460 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - HDMI和大量的存储

在欧洲中部,Yoga Tab 13目前只有一种设备配置。只有Wi-Fi,配备8GB内存和128GB存储。就存储设备而言,这使得它的价格很有价值,而相应的 iPad Pro则要贵得多。

除了USB-C端口外,Yoga Tab 13还提供了一个支持HDCP 1.4的微型HDMI端口。由于甚至包括了相应的电缆,Yoga Tab 13可以很容易地作为另一个有HDMI端口的设备的第二个显示器使用。这款平板电脑还可以使用笔输入进行操作,因此你可以把它作为一个图形平板电脑,例如。

顶部:扬声器、麦克风
顶部:扬声器、麦克风
左边:微型HDMI端口,麦克风
左边:微型HDMI端口,麦克风
右边。USB-C接口、待机键、音量摇杆、麦克风
右边。USB-C接口、待机键、音量摇杆、麦克风
底部:扬声器
底部:扬声器

软件--更新情况不清楚

Android 11预装在平板电脑上,联想内部的ZUI并没有对基本结构做很多改变。在测试时,安全补丁处于2021年6月的水平,所以迫切需要更新。

不幸的是,这款平板电脑(仍然)没有被列入联想的更新矩阵中。这使得我们很难预测任何新的软件版本。较小的Yoga Tab 11应该仍会在2022年中期得到Android ,我们认为这也应该发生在Yoga Tab 13上。

该操作系统完全为娱乐而设。从主屏幕向右滑动,会出现谷歌的娱乐空间,它将所有的娱乐应用捆绑在一起。其中包括游戏、YouTube等视频应用、音乐应用,以及Netflix等流媒体服务。提到Netflix:通过DRM-L1认证,你还可以在平板电脑上享受高清流媒体内容。

联想Yoga Tab 13软件
联想Yoga Tab 13软件
联想Yoga Tab 13软件

通信和GNSS--Yoga Tab 13仅配备WLAN

联想Yoga Tab 13目前只有Wi-Fi版本,所以它不提供对移动通信的支持。另一方面,你可以得到一个现代的Wi-Fi 6,具有2x2 MIMO和体面的速度,正如我们用Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器进行的测试所显示的那样。然而,我们的测试装置仍然没有达到 华为MatePad Pro 10.8的速度,尽管它使用旧的Wi-Fi 5,但显然有更多的内置天线,使其能够达到更高的速度。

通过蓝牙5.2,支持最新的蓝牙版本,但你必须在没有NFC的情况下才能做到。Wi-Fi版本也不提供GPS模块,因此,你只能通过WLAN网络获得大致的位置。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
873 (750min - 946max) MBit/s +1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
864 (771min - 896max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
722 (678min - 737max) MBit/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
630 (597min - 669max) MBit/s -27%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1065 (1022min - 1104max) MBit/s +34%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
795 (717min - 849max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
780 (699min - 882max) MBit/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
655 (601min - 674max) MBit/s -18%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø795 (717-849)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø864 (771-896)

摄像头 - 只有一个前置摄像头

用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

这款平板电脑的背面没有摄像头,前面只有一个用于自拍或视频通话的单镜头。虽然你仍然可以用Yoga Tab 13拍摄自拍以外的照片,但这是相当麻烦的。该相机的分辨率为800万像素,拍出的照片质量一般,表面结构不干净,颜色苍白,动态不大。在弱光条件下,你几乎无法在照片中看到任何东西。

因此,那些至少想偶尔拍照的人,最好由竞争对手提供服务。我们的三款对比设备都在背面提供了一个摄像头,在所有情况下对平板电脑来说都是不错的。根据你的使用场景,这对联想昂贵的平板电脑来说是一个明显的缺点。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera Umgebung
ColorChecker
18 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
20 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
15 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
16 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Yoga Tab 13: 14.07 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 20.6 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.3 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
66.4 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
37 ∆E
77.6 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
93.8 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Yoga Tab 13: 46.92 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 93.75 ∆E

配件和保修 - 盒子里有很多东西

联想在配件方面也不吝啬。除了充电器和USB线,盒子里还包括一条微型HDMI转HDMI线和一个从USB-C到3.5毫米音频的适配器,用于模拟耳机。

同样有趣的是,你可以在Yoga Tab 13上使用一支数字笔。这将花费近60欧元(约70美元)

在欧洲,联想为该平板电脑提供了两年的保修期。

输入设备和操作 - 准确的人脸识别

触摸屏可以准确操作,但似乎没有像 iPad Pro 12.9,它使用的是120赫兹的面板。虽然这些差异是明显的,但在日常操作中可能并不那么重要,这取决于你的使用。

谷歌的标准解决方案被用作屏幕键盘,但它也可以选择由Play Store的其他键盘应用程序取代。

如果需要,你可以通过人脸识别来解锁平板电脑,只要你从待机状态打开平板电脑,它就能可靠地工作,而且相当快。然而,这只是一个软件解决方案,它不像硬件支持的系统那样安全。

键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 纵向

显示屏--Yoga Tab 13采用深色显示屏

子像素网格
子像素网格

Yoga Tab 13的显示屏提供16:10格式,分辨率为2160 x 1350像素,比全高清略高。这使得这款平板电脑比iPad Pro 12.9略微呈矩形。 iPad Pro 12.9,这也意味着它略微更适合16:9的电影再现,因为顶部和底部只会有小黑条。

在分辨率和显示亮度方面,联想Yoga Tab 13无法跟上任何对比设备。联想指定400尼特(或cd/m²)为显示屏的平均亮度,我们的测试也证实了这一点。同时,Apple 、华为或三星的平板电脑提供了明显更亮的屏幕,产生约600cd/m²。联想的娱乐平板电脑的黑值和对比度也略差。

376
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 404 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 374.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.04 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 404 cd/m²
Contrast: 1010:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
IPS, 2160x1350, 13"
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
IPS mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.9"
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
LCD IPS, 2560x1600, 12.4"
Screen
40%
31%
48%
Brightness middle
404
620
53%
606
50%
619
53%
Brightness
374
612
64%
579
55%
593
59%
Brightness Distribution
85
96
13%
89
5%
91
7%
Black Level *
0.4
0.32
20%
0.22
45%
Contrast
1010
1894
88%
2814
179%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.94
1.8
39%
2.9
1%
2.6
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.74
4.9
44%
6
31%
6.6
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.3
3.1
28%
4.3
-0%
4
7%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2214 0%
2.22 99%
2.17 101%
CCT
7084 92%
6892 94%
7272 89%
6973 93%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们在测试实验室中运行CalMAN软件,并使用光谱光度计评估图像还原度。我们确定,与其他高端平板电脑相比,在默认设置以及预定义的 "明亮 "第二色彩模式下,色彩偏差略高。特别是白色的再现显示出一种绿色的色调。

CalMAN灰度 - 默认设置
CalMAN灰度 - 默认设置
CalMAN色彩精确度 - 默认设置
CalMAN色彩精确度 - 默认设置
CalMAN灰度--"亮 "色模式
CalMAN灰度--"亮 "色模式
CalMAN色彩精确度--"明亮 "色彩模式
CalMAN色彩精确度--"明亮 "色彩模式
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN Adobe RGB色彩空间
CalMAN Adobe RGB色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在户外,这款平板电脑能够做得相当好,但由于其亮度一般,如果你想轻松阅读屏幕,最好在晴天时找一个阴凉处。亮度传感器对光线条件变化的反应很迟钝。

可视角度的稳定性没有什么可抱怨的。

视角
视角
在户外使用
在户外使用

性能--板载了大量的平板电脑功率

平板电脑的核心是其SoC。联想已经决定使用 高通骁龙870这也是一个关于功率的决定。八个处理器内核的时钟速度高达3.2GHz,在日常操作中产生了很高的性能。虽然这款平板电脑的性能仍无法达到 Apple's iPad Pro 12.9M1处理器但它超过了所有其他Android 。

在图形方面,该SoC也显示了它的力量,在那里也提供了很多性能。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
1710 Points +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (943 - 1046, n=16)
989 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
967 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
759 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
656 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
7378 Points +136%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (2725 - 4455, n=16)
3245 Points +4%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
3131 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
2893 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2496 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
1885 Points -40%
OpenCL Score
Average of class Tablet (516 - 11980, n=11, last 2 years)
6500 Points +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (3413 - 3724, n=15)
3593 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
3508 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
1294 Points -63%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Average of class Tablet (532 - 11502, n=14, last 2 years)
4995 Points +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (3159 - 4324, n=13)
3603 Points +7%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
3371 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
1253 Points -63%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (9827 - 16054, n=15)
12937 Points +19%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
10829 Points
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9812 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
8897 Points -18%
3DMark
Wild Life Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
17221 Points +310%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (4166 - 4374, n=16)
4264 Points +1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
4204 Points
Average of class Tablet (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1743 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
1101 Points -74%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
18303 Points +341%
Average of class Tablet (289 - 32525, n=72, last 2 years)
4578 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (4152 - 4352, n=16)
4247 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
4154 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
1099 Points -74%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
5035 Points +319%
Average of class Tablet (75 - 8689, n=73, last 2 years)
1303 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1203 - 1254, n=15)
1232 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
1203 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
330 Points -73%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
4975 Points +316%
Average of class Tablet (72 - 8889, n=71, last 2 years)
1543 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1195 - 1246, n=15)
1226 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
1195 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
334 Points -72%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
120 fps +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (60 - 142, n=14)
100.8 fps +68%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 144, n=67, last 2 years)
63.9 fps +7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
60 fps 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
44 fps -27%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
588 fps +163%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
224 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (171 - 233, n=14)
215 fps -4%
Average of class Tablet (15 - 809, n=67, last 2 years)
187.6 fps -16%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
135 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
55 fps -75%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
115 fps +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (59 - 116, n=14)
83.8 fps +40%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
60 fps
Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 122, n=67, last 2 years)
52.1 fps -13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
44 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
25 fps -58%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
318 fps +143%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
131 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (96 - 142, n=14)
127.1 fps -3%
Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 530, n=67, last 2 years)
108.9 fps -17%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
64 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
43 fps -67%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
74 fps +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (33 - 95, n=14)
65.2 fps +11%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
59 fps
Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=67, last 2 years)
39.4 fps -33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
34 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
16 fps -73%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
227 fps +147%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
92 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (72 - 99, n=14)
88.9 fps -3%
Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=67, last 2 years)
78.2 fps -15%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
41 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
32 fps -65%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
55.3 fps +32%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
42 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (21 - 51, n=14)
41.5 fps -1%
Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 117.9, n=66, last 2 years)
24.6 fps -41%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
21 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
9.8 fps -77%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
150 fps +163%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
57 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (43 - 59, n=14)
54.9 fps -4%
Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 284, n=66, last 2 years)
46.4 fps -19%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
38 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
18 fps -68%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
43.7 fps +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (17 - 34, n=16)
28.8 fps +7%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
27 fps
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 106.4, n=78, last 2 years)
18.6 fps -31%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
13 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
6.7 fps -75%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
63 fps +186%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
22 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (18 - 23, n=16)
21.8 fps -1%
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 114.5, n=78, last 2 years)
21 fps -5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
17 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
7.3 fps -67%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
67 fps +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (22 - 54, n=16)
45.2 fps +5%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
43 fps
Average of class Tablet (3 - 120, n=78, last 2 years)
26.9 fps -37%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
17 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
10 fps -77%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
177 fps +200%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
59 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (50 - 62, n=16)
58.2 fps -1%
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 340, n=78, last 2 years)
55 fps -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
41 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
19 fps -68%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
1186706 Points +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (581322 - 716502, n=13)
682849 Points +1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
676505 Points
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)
464403 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
356422 Points -47%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
1037959 Points +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (573296 - 595585, n=3)
585665 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
573296 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
409039 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
303200 Points -47%
AImark - Score v2.x
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
119686 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (111838 - 123847, n=9)
117183 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
45392 Points -62%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
6164 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (5289 - 6369, n=13)
5926 Points -4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4738 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4210 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
3608 Points -41%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
Points -100%
System
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
10489 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (8463 - 10489, n=13)
9469 Points -10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8215 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7279 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
7162 Points -32%
Memory
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
7215 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (5689 - 8167, n=13)
7166 Points -1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
6751 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4874 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
4637 Points -36%
Graphics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
12350 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (10386 - 12801, n=13)
12016 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9171 Points -26%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8775 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
4022 Points -67%
Web
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
1544 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1315 - 1791, n=13)
1517 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
1283 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points -18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
1032 Points -33%

Legend

 
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 990, ARM Mali-G76 MP16, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

我们在上网时看到的情况相当类似。这 Apple iPad Pro 12.9是无以伦比的,与此同时,其他厂商的昂贵的Android 平板电脑也无法跟上联想Yoga Tab 13的步伐。

在实践中,这体现在快速加载的网页和滚动时立即显示的图像上,用户无需等待。一些小的吹毛求疵。由于60赫兹的显示屏,滚动并不十分流畅。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
182.5 Points +94%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)
108.7 Points +16%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)
94 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (60.7 - 108.3, n=12)
87.7 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
55.3 Points -41%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
55.1 Points -41%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
403.4 Points +136%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)
171.2 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (105.1 - 184.5, n=9)
147.7 Points -14%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
101.2 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
93.4 Points -45%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
221 Points +65%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)
149.6 Points +12%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)
134 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (94 - 155, n=13)
127.5 Points -5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
97 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
83 Points -38%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
210 runs/min +183%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)
115.5 runs/min +56%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chome 92)
74.2 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (51.4 - 77, n=12)
67.2 runs/min -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
63.9 runs/min -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
43.09 runs/min -42%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
62789 Points +86%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)
33694 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (20543 - 41256, n=13)
33246 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28653 Points -15%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
19885 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
17823 Points -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3789 ms * -227%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
2403 ms * -108%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
2345 ms * -103%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1055 - 1792, n=13)
1401 ms * -21%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)
1158 ms *
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
495 ms * +57%

* ... smaller is better

这款平板电脑的高性能能力也延续到了存储方面。这里使用的UFS-3.0存储证明了自己在读取和写入数据时的速度。

Lenovo Yoga Tab 13Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-28%
-11%
-17%
Sequential Read 256KB
1431
1789
25%
861
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB
711
399
-44%
512
-28%
546 ?(213 - 740, n=13)
-23%
Random Read 4KB
249.1
224.6
-10%
192
-23%
Random Write 4KB
215.2
262.4
22%
167.5
-22%
193.9 ?(29.9 - 271, n=13)
-10%

游戏--60帧的游戏

在游戏方面,Yoga Tab 13也显示出它正走在正确的道路上。虽然由于60赫兹的屏幕,最多只能达到60帧,但在 "Armajet "和 "PUBG Mobile "中,无论选择何种设置,都能稳定地保持这些帧数。

这意味着,联想已经对其平板电脑进行了很好的游戏优化。通过触摸屏和位置传感器的可靠操作是确保愉快游戏会话的额外因素。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.8 (58-60)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 1.6.0: Ø59.7 (58-60)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.6.0: Ø59.8 (57-60)

排放 - 一个好的音响系统

温度

野生动物压力测试
野生动物压力测试
野生动物极端压力测试
野生动物极端压力测试

经过较长时间的负载,最大的热量发展是40.8 °C (~105.4°F),这在局部非常有限。在一些地区,即使在负载下,你也感觉不到任何热量。因此,即使在热天,你也应该能够舒适地使用Yoga Tab 13。

性能能力不受热量发展的影响,这在3DMark Wild Life的压力测试场景中显示出来,即使在多次运行后,帧率仍然相当稳定。

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.5 (1093min - 1099max) % 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
99.5 (25.1min - 25.2max) %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
99.7 (7.29min - 7.31max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.5 (332min - 337max) % -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
74.6 % -25%
Max. Load
 25.9 °C28.1 °C33 °C 
 26.5 °C30.2 °C36.3 °C 
 27.4 °C31.4 °C37.3 °C 
Maximum: 37.3 °C
Average: 30.7 °C
35.3 °C30.3 °C26.8 °C
39.5 °C32.7 °C27.4 °C
40.8 °C32.7 °C28.6 °C
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 32.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

在这一点上,四个扬声器在高端平板电脑中已经不是什么稀罕物,而是标准。联想Yoga Tab 13满足了这一要求,甚至有可能通过其圆柱形的凸起带来一些额外的声量。这是否也会产生明显的积极影响?

在高达86 dB(A)的音量下,由JBL调校的四个扬声器可以变得相当响亮,因此,只要环境噪音不是太大,你甚至可以在中等大小的房间里使用它们。就音质而言,你也可以听到一些较低的频率,但扬声器听起来不像Apple"顶级平板电脑 "那样丰满。在最大音量下,高频有点过度强调。

你还可以通过蓝牙或USB-C连接外部扬声器或耳机。还有一个附带的3.5毫米音频的适配器。音质还算不错。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2050.750.32541.339.4313131.84035.637.8503840.26330.131.98030.839.210023.549.412520.36016020.366.220016.266.925015.970.831513.972.240013.669.750013.569.763019.37680016.572.6100013.973.812501471.8160013.272.4200013.272.6250014.267.431501670.8400017.271.9500017.978.5630018.578.5800019.175.41000019.869.41250019.369.81600020.158.4SPL28.886N1.172.4median 16.5median 71.8Delta32.640.840.724.323.326.527.326.324.323.720.627.523.441.822.557.318.763.421.764.622.863.117.867.417.469.517.871.918.974.215.27011.573.610.374.210.175.710.972.510.271.110.569.310.864.810.871.211.269.611.36511.47311.374.511.471.411.357.110.583.924.260.50.5median 70median 11.34.23.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Yoga Tab 13Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池和电源管理--Yoga平板电脑可持续使用很长时间

消耗功率

Yoga平板电脑在这里产生了一个混合的结果。一方面,在非常低或非常高的负载下,消耗量比其他平板电脑高,但另一方面,在空闲运行时,总体上非常高效。

Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 3 / 3.4 / 4.1 Watt
Load midlight 9.9 / 13.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
10000 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
7250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
10090 mAh
Power Consumption
-59%
2%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
3
1.8
40%
1.98
34%
1.06
65%
Idle Average *
3.4
9.6
-182%
5.66
-66%
6.25
-84%
Idle Maximum *
4.1
9.8
-139%
5.69
-39%
6.3
-54%
Load Average *
9.9
12.2
-23%
6.96
30%
8.76
12%
Load Maximum *
13.8
12.6
9%
6.98
49%
9.54
31%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13: Ø10.2 (5.86-15.9)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.7 (5.75-13.3)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.37 (3.18-3.69)

电池寿命

电池容量为10,000毫安时,具有相当大的容量,然后该平板电脑在闲置模式下也能持续40小时以上。实际效果是,你也可以让平板电脑在待机模式下躺上几天,而电池不会被耗尽。

在我们的WLAN测试中,该平板电脑持续了17:36小时,取得了非常好的成绩。因此,在中度使用的情况下,远离电源插头使用几天应该不成问题。在高负荷下,你也可以用Yoga Tab 13工作几个小时,然后再插上电源。

该平板电脑通过附带的30瓦充电器充电,充电时间约为2小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
42h 16min
WiFi Websurfing
17h 36min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 59min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 06min
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
10000 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
7250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
10090 mAh
Battery Runtime
-28%
-23%
3%
Reader / Idle
2536
1877
-26%
2485
-2%
H.264
1199
818
-32%
909
-24%
1249
4%
WiFi v1.3
1056
673
-36%
891
-16%
1020
-3%
Load
306
255
-17%
233
-24%
342
12%

Pros

+ 闪电般的速度
+ 电池寿命长
+ 伟大的声音系统
+ 快速的无线网络
+ 带有微型HDMI接口的广泛连接
+ 实用且符合人体工程学的设计
+ 笔输入

Cons

- 没有5G选项
- 显示屏较暗
- 相当重
- 做工略有不足
- 后面没有摄像头

结论--联想瞄准了娱乐业

测试联想Yoga Tab 13。测试装置由联想德国公司提供。
测试联想Yoga Tab 13。测试装置由联想德国公司提供。

联想的Yoga Tab 13是不同的。看一下圆柱形手柄的设计,你已经注意到这一点。这被证明是令人惊讶的符合人体工程学的,就像以前的型号一样。内置的脚架也非常实用,甚至允许你把它挂在墙上。

你得到的是目前最快的Android 平板电脑之一,其性能甚至能够与旧版本的Apple iPad Pro竞争。同时,Yoga Tab 13并不真正适合在户外使用,因为显示屏太暗,不适合。而对于旅行,也有更轻更薄的伴侣。

联想的Yoga Tab 13是一款灵活的大尺寸平板电脑,主要为娱乐而设计,性能很高。

尽管有笔支持和微型HDMI端口,联想的目标是娱乐界的朋友,而不是不喜欢任何妥协的专业用户。这些用户可能会更喜欢iPad Pro,它的速度又明显更快,分辨率更高,并提供120-Hz显示屏。

然而,那些出于某种原因不想使用Apple 生态系统的人,或者那些只是想找一个更实惠的替代品的人,会在Yoga Tab 13上得到他们所付出的东西:长的电池寿命、良好的声音、体面的游戏性能、现代设备和快速的WLAN是一些很好的论据。

另一方面,背面没有摄像头和没有5G选项是联想Yoga Tab 13不得不接受的明显缺点,与之相比,联想Yoga Tab 13的缺点是:1. 三星Galaxy Tab S7 FE比如说。或者说,为华为MatePad Pro说话的论点 华为MatePad Pro是更明亮的面板和更好的做工,但问题是缺乏谷歌服务,以及你无法复制高清流媒体内容的事实,因为它缺乏Widevine认证。

价格和可用性

联想Yoga Tab 13只有带WLAN和128GB存储的单一版本。在美国,联想出售的平板电脑价格约为680美元。

Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 - 09/22/2021 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
85 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
77 / 80 → 96%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
43 / 70 → 62%
Weight
78 / 40-88 → 79%
Battery
92%
Display
84%
Games Performance
61 / 78 → 78%
Application Performance
83 / 92 → 91%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
84 / 91 → 92%
Camera
25 / 85 → 30%
Average
77%
86%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想Yoga Tab 13平板电脑评测--拥有强大音效的多媒体平板电脑
Florian Schmitt, 2021-09-24 (Update: 2024-08-15)