惠普 ZBook 15u G3 工作站简短评测
HP ZBook 15u G3 (ZBook 15u G4 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-6600U 2 x 2.6 - 3.4 GHz @ 2.6 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
AMD FirePro W4190M - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 900 MHz, RAM: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, 15.201.1701.1005
Memory
16 GB
, DDR4-2133
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, 10点触控, CMN15C3, TN LED, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Sunrise Point-LP
Storage
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, 256 GB
Weight
2.166 kg, Power Supply: 318 g
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMN15C3 tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Maximum: 297.8 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 283.8 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 297.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 351:1 (Black: 0.849 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 9.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
80.42% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
50.99% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
53.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
| HP ZBook 15u G3 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE 15.5", 2880x1620 | Dell Precision 5510 15.6", 3840x2160 | HP ZBook 15 G2 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 13% | 57% | 26% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 53.2 | 62.3 17% | 88.4 66% | 68.5 29% |
| sRGB Coverage | 80.1 | 86.5 8% | 100 25% | 97.3 21% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 54.9 | 62.6 14% | 99.5 81% | 70.7 29% |
| Response Times | -12% | |||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.6 ? | 56.4 ? -24% | ||
| Response Time Black / White * | 34.4 ? | 34 ? 1% | ||
| PWM Frequency | 198.4 ? | |||
| Screen | 33% | 56% | 31% | |
| Brightness middle | 297.8 | 360 21% | 391 31% | 309 4% |
| Brightness | 284 | 323 14% | 361 27% | 289 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 81 -9% | 87 -2% | 84 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.849 | 0.54 36% | 0.4 53% | 0.47 45% |
| Contrast | 351 | 667 90% | 978 179% | 657 87% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.68 | 3.45 60% | 4.85 44% | 3.82 56% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.98 | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.3 | 2.98 68% | 4.01 57% | 5.94 36% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.06 107% | 2.18 101% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 10585 61% | 6338 103% | 7340 89% | 6996 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 50.99 | 56 10% | 96 88% | 63.8 25% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 80.42 | 86.3 7% | 100 24% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 23% /
28% | 34% /
46% | 29% /
30% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 198.4 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
| PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5493 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3974 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4453 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4900 points | |
Help | ||
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Transfer Rate Minimum:
990 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum:
1140 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average:
1127 MB/s
Access Time:
0.1 ms
Burst Rate:
231.5 MB/s
CPU Usage:
5.7 %
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 12929 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2173 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 37532 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6567 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1517 points | |
Help | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value) | |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
| HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 85.2 | 38.42 | 34.08 | 13.64 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 14 | 8 |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 FirePro W4190M, 6600U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Dell Precision 5510 Quadro M1000M, E3-1505M v5, SK hynix SC920 512 GB | Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE Quadro K620M, 5500U, Samsung SSD PM851 512 GB MZ7TE512HMHP | HP ZBook 15 G2 FirePro M5100, 4910MQ, SanDisk A110 SD6PP4M-256G-1006 | MSI WS60 2OJ8H11W7P Quadro K2100M, 4710HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | 13% | 0% | 1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.8 | 30 -1% | 26.9 10% | 30.6 -3% | 30.4 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 29.8 | 30 -1% | 26.9 10% | 30.6 -3% | 30.4 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.8 | 30 -1% | 26.9 10% | 30.6 -3% | 30.4 -2% |
| Load Average * | 39.5 | 42.08 -7% | 30.4 23% | 35.7 10% | 36.6 7% |
| Load Maximum * | 43.2 | 46.78 -8% | 38.1 12% | 43.2 -0% | 42.3 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 29.8 / 29.8 / 29.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 39.5 / 43.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.7 °C / 83.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-0.8 °C / -1.5 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.7 °C / 83.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-0.8 °C / -1.5 F).
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | / 0.68 Watt |
| Idle | 4.3 / 7.9 / 11.5 Watt |
| Load |
43.3 / 72.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP ZBook 15u G3 FirePro W4190M, 6600U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Dell Precision 5510 Quadro M1000M, E3-1505M v5, SK hynix SC920 512 GB | Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE Quadro K620M, 5500U, Samsung SSD PM851 512 GB MZ7TE512HMHP | HP ZBook 15 G2 FirePro M5100, 4910MQ, SanDisk A110 SD6PP4M-256G-1006 | MSI WS60 2OJ8H11W7P Quadro K2100M, 4710HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -85% | 6% | -149% | -83% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 8.6 -100% | 4 7% | 17.1 -298% | 8.8 -105% |
| Idle Average * | 7.9 | 16.2 -105% | 9.6 -22% | 21.9 -177% | 12.4 -57% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.5 | 16.7 -45% | 10.8 6% | 23.2 -102% | 22.4 -95% |
| Load Average * | 43.3 | 82.6 -91% | 36.9 15% | 86.6 -100% | 89 -106% |
| Load Maximum * | 72.3 | 131.8 -82% | 54.5 25% | 120.7 -67% | 111.7 -54% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP ZBook 15u G3 FirePro W4190M, 6600U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Dell Precision 5510 Quadro M1000M, E3-1505M v5, SK hynix SC920 512 GB | Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE Quadro K620M, 5500U, Samsung SSD PM851 512 GB MZ7TE512HMHP | HP ZBook 15 G2 FirePro M5100, 4910MQ, SanDisk A110 SD6PP4M-256G-1006 | MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 Quadro M2000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -25% | 111% | -41% | -70% | |
| Reader / Idle | 756 | 428 -43% | 1728 129% | 370 -51% | 160 -79% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 312 | 286 -8% | 715 129% | 278 -11% | 106 -66% |
| Load | 141 | 109 -23% | 247 75% | 53 -62% | 51 -64% |
| H.264 | 197 | 667 | 260 | 141 | |
| WiFi | 298 | 237 |
Pros
+ 实用且诱人的设计
+ 轻盈
+ 出色的输入设备
+ 考虑到尺寸，接口配备优秀
+ 支持双硬盘配置
+ 由于搭配了NVMe固态硬盘，读写性能超高
+ 在负载下噪音小，温度合理
+ 对于移动工作站来说功耗低，电池续航优秀
Cons
- 维护不够方便
- 屏幕对比度和色彩准确度较差
- TN屏幕的可视角度范围小
- 亮度低于100%时均使用了闪烁亮度控制
- 在处理器／显卡性能方面无法与其它工作站竞争，包括戴尔Precision M5510
- 无法在负载下充分利用处理器或显卡的加速性能
仅仅一年之前，尺寸略大的惠普 ZBook 15 G2得到了89%的优异成绩，它在机身品质，维护升级空间，输入设备，屏幕品质，以及各方面性能上都表现一流。一年之后，相比肯定的回答，轻了近30%的ZBook 15u G3给我们留下了更多的问号。当然它有很多值得称赞的地方，比如轻盈同时坚固的机身设计，优秀的接口配备以及硬盘选项（包括NVMe固态硬盘），低噪音和发热量，以及相对优秀的电池续航。
不过它也有缺点，对于已经熟悉了毫无弱点的ZBook 15 G2的用户来说可能有些难以接受。特别是，双核处理器和AMD FirePro W4190M显卡可能相比前代ZBook中的四核以及高TDP硬件显得不够强劲，相比其它的便携机型如戴尔 Precision M5510也是一样。不仅如此，我们无法完全利用处理器和显卡的加速性能，不论是单独运行还是同时运行的情况。同时我们的测试机搭载的1080p屏幕表现让人失望，它的对比度和色彩准确度都很差；这点可能对于一些用户来说并不重要，不过相比上周我们测试的另一机型来说是一个严重退步。至少其它的配置型号没有出现这个问题。
Book 15u G3相比纤薄的身材带来的妥协可能对于已经熟悉了毫无弱点的ZBook 15 G2的用户来说有些难以接受。
不过考虑到整体环境，惠普ZBook 15u G3对于一部分用户来说依然十分合理。实际上它的定价十分实惠（我们的测试机售价1350美元），它还捆绑了三年的现场保修。除此之外，并不是所有人都需要把四核处理器或顶级工作站显卡放进笔记本电脑之中，一部分人也愿意牺牲屏幕品质来节省一些成本。这些注重性价比的用户将会对ZBook 15u G3更加有兴趣，它是目前不多的几款介于超极本和移动工作站之间，而不过于偏向二者之一同时保证了性价比的设备之一。另外，如果预算不是问题的话，我们很难说它是否相比戴尔 Precision M5510更值得推荐，它应该是和ZBook 15u理念最接近的竞争对手。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
HP ZBook 15u G3
- 03/07/2016 v5 (old)
Steve Schardein
Workstation - Weighted Average
Price comparison
