华硕ZenBook 14X OLED AMD笔记本电脑评测中。颜色多,电池寿命长,价格低
华硕在OLED上下注。许多笔记本电脑系列都默认配备了OLED显示屏。不仅是高端的Zenbook受益于更多的色彩和对比度,Vivobooks也是如此,例如 Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC.
这将OLED和3K/4K带入了较低的价格区域,而更多的制造商将效仿。当与没有OLED的设备的差异只达到200至300欧元(约204至约305美元)时,中端客户将开始认真考虑购买OLED。
也就是说,华硕的Zenbook 14X并没有呈现出中档的硬件和做工。机箱特别坚固,质量很高。输入设备是一流的,Ryzen 7的性能在顶级次笔记本联盟中排名靠前--这要归功于45瓦的处理器。
竞争对手也有OLED,如 戴尔XPS 13 9310 OLED或联想Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14,它也有一个GeForce MX450.在内部,有一个几乎相同结构的 Zenbook 14X UX5400EA,它的顶级配置中也有一个MX450。
由于没有那么多的OLED 14英寸机,我们也会考虑IPS的对手。这款HP Envy 14-eb0010nr配有英特尔处理器和GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q对于游戏爱好者来说可能是最有趣的。这款Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC配备了名义上更强大的RTX 3050和OLED,但它的外壳并不像Zenbook 14X那样纤薄和高质量。
我们审查过的其他华硕Zenbook。
华硕Zenbook 14X OLED UX5400EA与Tiger Lake MX450
华硕ZenBook 14 UX435EGTiger Lake MX450 IPS
华硕ZenBook 13 OLED UX325EATiger Lake MX450
华硕Zenbook S13 OLEDRyzen 6800U
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 R7 5800H, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 3456x2160 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.5 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
84.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
82.2 % v7 (old) | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 高品质的华硕电脑
该机箱与14X英特尔版本完全相同,甚至在端口方面也没有任何区别。华硕避免让机箱尽可能地轻,但这导致了机箱的抗扭性。盖子不能用普通的力气翘起来。盖子的铝制背面与内置的显示面板形成一个看似坚不可摧的单元。对背部施加的压力或扭转的尝试不会对屏幕产生任何影响。
铰链的质量也很牢固。关闭的位置以磁力固定在底座上;上面的小缝隙可以用一根手指拉开。之后,铰链就紧紧地固定在那里,在携带或提起设备时没有任何晃动或移动。
底部装置也是如此,它完全由铝制成,包括可拆卸的底盖。键盘在任何时候都不会屈服,而底座本身也是完全坚硬的。
Zenbook的重量为1.406公斤,是较重的子笔记本之一。在比较领域中,它只被以下产品超过了HP Envy 14-eb0010nr其1.6公斤。与较轻的14英寸和13英寸笔记本的平均值相比,有100克的差异。然而,作为回报,你会得到一个更坚固的底座。比较中最薄的机型是戴尔XPS 13 9310 OLED14.8毫米,只有1.2公斤。Zenbook 14X的厚度为17毫米,属于平均水平,但华硕并没有用它建立新的标准。
连接性 - 没有Thunderbolt
AMD版本没有Thunderbolt端口,但从外部看,这些端口是一样的。两个Type-C端口支持DisplayPort,这意味着理论上可以连接三个显示器,因为还有HDMI。然而,在实践中,这种情况不会发生,因为一个Type-C接口会被电源适配器挡住。不再有一个用于电源适配器的空心连接器。
SD卡阅读器
microSD读卡器的表现一般,但不如戴尔XPS的表现好。我们使用AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60进行测试。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
沟通
英特尔AX200 Wi-Fi模块被插入,它甚至可以被交换。我们在全新的华硕GT-AXE11000 Wi-Fi 6路由器和我们的Zenbook之间没有遇到任何连接问题。速度高于该芯片的平均水平。英特尔版本在板上有一个AX201,但它是焊接的。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (447 - 1645, n=127) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (523 - 1684, n=128) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (1347 - 1700, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (951 - 1784, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (1006 - 1696, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (642 - 1792, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
网络摄像头
E-Shutter网络摄像机即使在最好的照明条件下,也会产生低分辨率和有噪音的720p图像。电子快门意味着,当按下相应的F键时,摄像头被电动关闭。不幸的是,你不能像机械快门那样在相机镜头前直观地检测到这一点,机械快门会显示一个红色的 "帘子"。然而,正如戴尔XPS 13所显示的那样,在竞争者中质量并没有好到哪里去。
辅料
配件包括100瓦的电源适配器,一个USB Type-A以太网加密狗,以及一个设备的套筒。一支带电池和可更换笔尖的数字笔--与英特尔版本的14X一样--并不包括在AMD版本中。英特尔和AMD版本的Zenbook目前都配备了触摸屏。
维护
松开螺丝,在前面打开一个缺口,就可以拆下底盖。Wi-Fi模块、电池和固态硬盘可以被替换,而内存则在机身上。
担保
华硕在德国给予两年的提货和退货保证。
Input devices - Fast typing on the laptop
键盘
哑光的防滑键有一个独特的压力点,行程适中,冲程有力。打字时几乎没有声音。由于采用了三段式白色背光,在黑暗环境中工作是可能的。使用方向键需要一点灵巧性,这对换挡键的好处是异常小的。
按笔记本电脑的标准,按键间距相当大(2.5毫米),因为这里使用的是底座的整个宽度。右侧甚至有足够的空间用于上/下页和主页/末页--这是在实际使用中完成的布局。键盘坚实的底座是一个非常积极的方面;这里没有任何东西产生,没有任何一点。
总而言之,结果是一个宽敞的键盘,只是在压力点方面有点落后于商业专业人士。在Zenbook上快速打字是绝对可能的。华硕用一个可以在ClickPad上启用的小键盘来补充这个键盘。
触摸板
ClickPad的敏感度一直到边缘,而且它的行程很短。它的操作有一种沉闷、安静的噪音。哑光表面很光滑,只是接近于滑溜。它能舒适地引导手指。不过,我们发现短距离的移动是不令人满意的。
显示 - 大量的色彩,大量的对比度
购买Zenbook 14X的主要理由是其14英寸OLED面板。三星提供了一个WQXGA+面板,像素为2880x1,800(16:10)。刷新率为90赫兹,响应时间为2毫秒,该显示器超过了任何IPS面板。
它还承诺100%的DCI-P3色域,这一点我们也可以通过测量确认。华硕报告的亮度为400尼特,而我们测量的平均亮度为366cd/m²,最大亮度为372cd/m²。尼特和cd/m²是1:1转换的,所以制造商宣传的亮度几乎没有。亮度是均匀分布的,这是典型的OLED(97%的亮度分布)。
无论如何,高亮度对OLED显示器是有害的,所以你不应该连续使用它。华硕用一个不能禁用的OLED屏保来应对烧毁问题。它在15分钟后开启。用户可以在评估风险后停用屏保(警告通知)。这只能 通过个人的MyAsus设置来实现。这迫使用户创建一个账户。
屏占比为92%;这意味着很多显示屏周围的边框非常小。三星的面板使用直流调光来降低亮度。这种行为也可以在MyAsus中调整。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 363 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.45 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 Samsung SDC4154 ATNA40YK04-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Samsung 134XK01, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.4" | Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W Samsung SDC415B ATNA40YN04-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr AU Optronics AUOF392, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T SAMSUNG: SDC4171, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 BOE CQ NV140FHM-N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 0% | -15% | -1% | 0% | -53% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 100 | 99.7 0% | 100 0% | 77.1 -23% | 99.41 -1% | 99.9 0% | 39.9 -60% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.94 0% | 100 0% | 58.8 -41% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98 | 97.7 0% | 98 0% | 76.7 -22% | 94.79 -3% | 97.6 0% | 41.2 -58% |
Response Times | 39% | 44% | -2197% | 50% | 67% | -535% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 2.2 ? -10% | 2 ? -0% | 61.2 ? -2960% | 3 ? -50% | 2.4 ? -20% | 25 ? -1150% |
Response Time Black / White * | 3 ? | 2.2 ? 27% | 2 ? 33% | 46 ? -1433% | 3 ? -0% | 2.4 20% | 16 ? -433% |
PWM Frequency | 120 ? | 240.4 ? 100% | 240 ? 100% | 360 200% | 362.3 ? 202% | 92 ? -23% | |
Screen | -14% | 17% | 18% | 24% | 14% | -49% | |
Brightness middle | 363 | 384 6% | 345 -5% | 412 13% | 384 6% | 399 10% | 347 -4% |
Brightness | 367 | 387 5% | 348 -5% | 392 7% | 385 5% | 401 9% | 311 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 97 0% | 98 1% | 81 -16% | 98 1% | 98 1% | 81 -16% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.07 | 0.001 | 0.12 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.92 | 4.56 -56% | 1.92 34% | 1.88 36% | 1.75 40% | 2.5 14% | 5.05 -73% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.34 | 7.27 -36% | 4.72 12% | 3.06 43% | 3.41 36% | 4.6 14% | 16.98 -218% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.92 | 4.52 -55% | 1.96 33% | 2.32 21% | 2.2 25% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.45 | 1.5 39% | 0.85 65% | 2.2 10% | 1.06 57% | 1.8 27% | 1.63 33% |
Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.26 97% | 2.37 93% | 2.1 105% | 2.39 92% | 2.17 101% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6109 106% | 6219 105% | 6475 100% | 6650 98% | 6440 101% | 6368 102% | 6666 98% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 87.1 | 68.7 | 38 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99.8 | 58 | ||||
Contrast | 1288 | 5486 | 399000 | 2892 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
2% | 20% /
20% | -731% /
-359% | 24% /
24% | 27% /
23% | -212% /
-172% |
* ... smaller is better
正如预期的那样,OLED显示屏表现出出色的对比度(∞:1);黑色是深黑色,颜色是鲜艳的。作为OLED的典型,响应时间也很好。MyAsus处理颜色和OLED的问题。
在校准之前,我们确定灰度和颜色的DeltaE值分别为2.5和2.9--这些是好的比率,因为它们低于3.0。校准并不能改善结果。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
用于降低亮度的PWM在360赫兹下用于0到5的亮度水平(10,见上下图);高于这个水平,则使用直流调光(无图像,用线代替波)。这种技术是PWM的一种替代方法,即像素在短时间内被关闭。直流调光会降低电压,这就是为什么像素发出的亮度较低。低于60%的亮度,直流调光将导致色彩再现的显著恶化,这就是为什么OLED面板在这里使用PWM(360Hz)。敏感的用户可能会受此影响,尽管我们在实践中很少将亮度设置在60%以下。在有日光的正常办公环境中,我们使用的亮度为70%-80%。用户可以通过 "无闪烁OLED调光 "选项调整显示器的调光水平。
眩光型表面在户外受到反射的影响,即使是良好的亮度也没有什么帮助。该面板可以在阴暗的地方很好地使用,这也是因为在电池供电的情况下亮度不会降低(屏幕中心的亮度为363cd/m²)。
毫无疑问,OLED面板的可视角度是目前最好的。即使从平坦的角度看,颜色也保持稳定,而且亮度也不会失去强度。
性能--得益于AMD Ryzen的更大提升
的锐龙7 5800H是一款适用于大型笔记本电脑的处理器,但这并不妨碍华硕把它放在一个14英寸的设备中。然而,该处理器享有双风扇的奢侈,这对于没有专用图形的笔记本电脑SOC来说是不寻常的。该芯片包括八个Zen 3核心,运行速度高达4.4GHz。5800H是唯一的芯片选择,不包括英特尔版本。甚至16GB内存(板载)和512GB固态硬盘似乎也是标准配置;没有其他选择。
测试条件
在MyASUS应用程序中可以选择三种不同的性能模式。这里有性能模式、标准模式和耳语模式。性能模式只适用于外部电源。根据测试要求,我们选择了不同的性能模式。这样,基准测试是在性能模式下进行的。负载下的电池耐久性和平均负载下的能量测量是在标准模式下进行的。悄悄话模式被选作电池运行时间测量和空闲能量测量。最大能量消耗是在性能模式下测量的。所有三种性能模式也进行了噪声排放测试。
处理器
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H是一款强大的移动处理器,有八个核心和16个线程。在日常使用中,Ryzen 7可以轻松处理所有负载。在性能基准测试中,该处理器显示了AMD典型的高多核性能,而在单核基准测试中,它与英特尔的处理器相当。
在这方面,正如Cinebench R15循环所显示的那样,AMD处理器即使在长时间的负载下也能保持其高性能。然而,有一些笔记本电脑的AMD Ryzen 7 5800H在我们的数据库中,有一些配备AMD Ryzen 7 5800H的笔记本电脑从该处理器中获取了更多的性能(与平均水平相比为-8%)。在这台Zenbook中,根据性能模式,Ryzen 7被允许以45瓦的功率运行,甚至在更远的距离上也是如此。在电池供电时,系统只允许处理器以24瓦的功率运行。
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (8812 - 13214, n=29) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=61, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1294 - 1441, n=29) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (3430 - 5020, n=31) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (502 - 560, n=30) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1487 - 2119, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (209 - 234, n=29) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (237 - 340, n=29) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (45773 - 59986, n=28) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5038 - 5632, n=29) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (6551 - 9062, n=28) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1336 - 1505, n=28) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (11.6 - 16.1, n=29) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (47.4 - 113, n=29) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (0.511 - 0.559, n=28) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (10349 - 15169, n=29) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (63663 - 95954, n=29) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (2096 - 3287, n=29) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (91846 - 99215, n=29) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (9962 - 11871, n=29) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (36083 - 52732, n=29) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (50226 - 127832, n=29) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (591 - 828, n=29) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5457 - 7884, n=29) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 53954, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (14445 - 25421, n=29) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
系统性能
根据PCMark 10,Zenbook 14X在应用性能方面处于最顶端,它甚至可以在生产力方面领先于AMD Ryzen 9和XPS 13,占据首位。这不一定是英特尔670p固态硬盘的功劳,下面关于固态硬盘的部分将显示。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (5989 - 6365, n=5) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (10112 - 10690, n=5) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (9198 - 9729, n=5) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (6236 - 6730, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1352 - 1429, n=3) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1356 - 1408, n=3) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1444 - 1523, n=3) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1105 - 1233, n=3) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W |
PCMark 10 Score | 5989 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (34964 - 44180, n=29) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (39548 - 47260, n=29) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 112837, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (28456 - 47022, n=29) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (76.3 - 105.1, n=29) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
用LatencyMon进行的延迟测试的结果是略低于两毫秒的延迟。因此,在我们测试的硬件和软件配置中,笔记本电脑有能力处理实时应用。在播放我们的4K 60 Hz YouTube测试视频时,只有一帧被丢弃。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
* ... smaller is better
储存
内置的英特尔670p固态硬盘排名在中游。在我们的SSD和HDD的基准表中,英特尔SSD占据了较低的位置之一。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W -1! | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
内置的Vega 8 iGPU是更强大的iGPU之一,它可以将许多游戏流畅地带到屏幕上--在低分辨率和设置下。以最大速度(1900MHz)长时间运行是可能的--这在我们的TheWitcher 3测试中显示。然而,这只适用于 "性能模式 "配置文件处于激活状态,并且笔记本电脑被插上。基准测试结果与我们迄今为止确定的Vega 8 iGPU的平均值相对应。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6542 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23278 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3554 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1444 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
在像《东京幽灵》这样的现代游戏中,FPS下降到了膝盖,在低设置下甚至不可能有可玩的速率。在较早的作品中,情况有所不同;在全高清分辨率下使用中等设置时,最多可以达到25至35FPS。Radeon iGPU的性能对其设计来说是平均水平。对这一点不满意的用户可以考虑英特尔14X兄弟姐妹机型的MX450,或华硕的 Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC,它没有那么苗条,但它确实配备了OLED面板。
GTA V - 1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (63.4 - 172.6, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (34 - 148, n=42) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 |
Ghostwire Tokyo - 1920x1080 Low Settings | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (13 - 21.3, n=4) |
不管这是否是一个游戏设备,我们测试了一次iGPU的稳定性。 Witcher 3,在这里以全高清分辨率和Ultra设置循环运行。在测试过程中,我们中途拔掉了笔记本的插头。起初,iGPU不断让自己的2000MHz时钟速率,伴随着62℃(~144°F)的适度温度。在电池供电的情况下,时钟速率不得不下降,即使是在性能模式下。现在它在1,400和1,800MHz之间波动。
The Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 101 | 34 | |||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 68.1 | 44 | 21 | 14.4 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 117.5 | 100.2 | 58.1 | 53.6 | 14.9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 38.1 | 19.2 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 50.1 | 39.2 | 35.2 | 25.3 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 46 | 26 | 22 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 83.7 | 32.6 | 27.8 | 23.2 | |
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 17.6 | 16.6 |
排放 - 应要求提供无声的Windows笔记本电脑
噪声排放
在整个负载范围内,Zenbook并没有产生过多的噪音。在日常使用中(办公室、互联网),风扇是安静的,没有噪音。这也适用于性能模式,所以用户不必不断地来回切换。在负载情况下,声压级上升到45 dB(A)--这比英特尔版本的声音要大一些。
积极的一面。风扇需要相对较长的时间才会启动。负载下的噪音发展可以通过使用 "耳语模式 "性能配置文件来减少--以牺牲处理能力为代价。然而,正如我们在上面的PCMarks中看到的那样,性能的下降是很小的。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.6 / 24.6 / 24.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45 / 51.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.6 dB(A) |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 Vega 8, R7 5800H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H) | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 GeForce MX450, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 11% | -0% | 1% | -11% | 2% | -5% | |
off / environment * | 24.6 | 24.8 -1% | 26.6 -8% | 25.9 -5% | 25.4 -3% | 24.7 -0% | 26 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.6 | 25 -2% | 26.6 -8% | 26 -6% | 25.4 -3% | 24.7 -0% | 26 -6% |
Idle Average * | 24.6 | 25 -2% | 26.6 -8% | 26 -6% | 25.4 -3% | 24.7 -0% | 26 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.6 | 25 -2% | 27.2 -11% | 26 -6% | 30.9 -26% | 27.3 -11% | 26 -6% |
Load Average * | 45 | 25.3 44% | 40.1 11% | 34.9 22% | 56 -24% | 41 9% | 46.3 -3% |
Load Maximum * | 51.5 | 35.8 30% | 40.4 22% | 48.7 5% | 56 -9% | 43.5 16% | 52.9 -3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.8 | 34.5 | 43.5 | 46.3 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在日常使用中(办公室、互联网),温度处于绿色区域内。在压力测试中,某些区域的温度上升。双风扇做得很好;它们在键盘上方吸入空气,并通过左右两边将废热吹出机箱。这样一来,掌托始终保持凉爽。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.4 °C / -4.4 F).
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 2% | -11% | -5% | -11% | -9% | -17% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.5 | 46.6 -10% | 49.1 -16% | 41.2 3% | 42.3 -0% | 44.5 -5% | 55.6 -31% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.7 | 46 -5% | 50.4 -15% | 45.6 -4% | 49.6 -14% | 56.4 -29% | 67.8 -55% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31.1 | 26.6 14% | 33.6 -8% | 31.8 -2% | 34.2 -10% | 29.1 6% | 28.3 9% |
Idle Bottom * | 32 | 29.2 9% | 33.6 -5% | 37.8 -18% | 37.9 -18% | 34 -6% | 28.9 10% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
CPU和GPU分别以3.5GHz和930MHz的频率开始压力测试(Prime95和FurMark)。在这种情况下,优先考虑的是CPU,当出现瓶颈时,iGPU不得不退居次席。随着测试的进行,时钟速率下降到2.7 GHz(CPU),而iGPU保持在900 MHz。压力测试代表了一种极端情况。我们用这个测试来检查系统是否在全负荷下保持稳定。
发言人
Zenbook提供了音量,一定量的低频和低音,它以一种平衡的方式再现了高音。小型扬声器位于掌托下的左右两边,将表面作为反射器。在这方面,声音在桌子的硬表面上比在地毯上更好。双阵列麦克风可以无噪音地拾取声音,是视频通话和会议的理想选择。
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65.71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 偶尔耗电,长期节俭
能源消耗
最大空闲功耗为11瓦,与其他OLED设备持平。在其他方面,可实现的最大亮度在这里发挥了作用,我们的Zenbook比Yoga Slim或戴尔XPS 13低。令人遗憾的是。OLED强制屏保导致空闲时不必要的6-8瓦的高额外消耗。
Witcher 3Ultra,即最大游戏负荷,是54瓦,这是由于适度强大的iGPU。图形负载在开始时没有峰值,但在Prime95和FurMark的压力测试中,处理器部分有。在压力测试的最大负载期间,100瓦的电源适配器并没有被过度消耗。我们在开始的很短的时间内测量到81瓦,然后它就稳定在65-70瓦的水平。
使用外部显示器的功耗显示了一个全面的情况。在CPU负载期间,SoC允许自己在开始时有5秒钟的80-85瓦的峰值,然后不断下降到60-65瓦。在英特尔酷睿i7-1185G7(戴尔XPS 13,Zenbook 14X英特尔)中没有观察到如此高的初始启动。
Off / Standby | 0.17 / 0.25 Watt |
Idle | 6.7 / 9.3 / 11.1 Watt |
Load |
53.5 / 81 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 R7 5800H, Vega 8, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.4" | Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H), OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 22% | -17% | -40% | -15% | -39% | 6% | 19% | 19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.7 | 5.7 15% | 8.1 -21% | 4.2 37% | 6.6 1% | 9.5 -42% | 3 55% | 5.26 ? 21% | 4.49 ? 33% |
Idle Average * | 9.3 | 6 35% | 10 -8% | 18.3 -97% | 9.6 -3% | 14.1 -52% | 6.3 32% | 7.78 ? 16% | 7.66 ? 18% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.1 | 12.3 -11% | 11 1% | 19.2 -73% | 7.3 34% | 14.9 -34% | 10.3 7% | 9.18 ? 17% | 9.56 ? 14% |
Load Average * | 53.5 | 44.4 17% | 67.8 -27% | 72.9 -36% | 73 -36% | 79.5 -49% | 66 -23% | 44.9 ? 16% | 46.6 ? 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.8 | 36.5 33% | 57 -4% 72.3 -32% | 61.5 -12% | 74.4 -36% | 73.5 -34% | 66.6 -22% | ||
Load Maximum * | 81 | 47.8 41% | 104 -28% | 127.8 -58% | 119 -47% | 98.5 -22% | 90.6 -12% | 59.4 ? 27% | 68.6 ? 15% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption during our The Witcher 3 test / stress test
Energy consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试中,这款14英寸的手机实现了8小时的良好运行时间。一个脚本被用来重现访问网站引起的负载。英特尔版本没有那么长的时间:在相同容量的情况下为5:30小时。这对于OLED 14英寸显示器来说是一个非常好的结果;其他OLED机型的持续时间要少20%到30%。
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 R7 5800H, Vega 8, 63 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 63 Wh | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 63.3 Wh | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450, 61 Wh | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 52.4 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -21% | -19% | 14% | 17% | -34% | 5% | 35% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 496 | 391 -21% | 334 -33% | 649 31% | 569 15% | 327 -34% | 523 5% | 719 ? 45% |
Load | 94 | 89 -5% | 90 -4% | 112 19% | 116.6 ? 24% | |||
Reader / Idle | 675 | 1661 | 687 | 1750 ? | ||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 98 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 比英特尔的电池寿命更好
AMD版本的ZenBook 14X OLED(UM5401QA-XXX)保持了英特尔版本的成功。 英特尔版本,但它的重点是价格。其结果是一个高质量的入门级ZenBook,价格约为1,000欧元(约合1,022美元),提供明显更长的电池寿命,具有相同的显示屏和制造质量。除了缺少Thunderbolt,外壳、输入设备和端口都与英特尔版本相同。英特尔版本有Thunderbolt 4和一个小型专用MX450 GPU的优势。这可以让游戏运行得更流畅一些。
处理能力将英特尔的同类产品甩在后面;Ryzen APU有更多的提升,在更长的时间内有更高的持续处理能力。这伴随着更高的负载量--但这可以通过华硕提供的性能模式来调整。如果需要,Zenbook 14X AMD可以像耳语一样安静,即使在高活动期间。由于保守的设置而导致的性能损失很低。
选择Zenbook 14X的用户将获得大量的显示效果,加上强大的45瓦处理能力,以及坚固的高质量构造。
和以前一样,我们不得不批评MyAsus的强制账户。没有注册的用户无法访问基本的性能、电池和OLED设置。这是唯一可以激活性能模式的地方,也是唯一可以禁用恼人的OLED屏保的地方。
再多花300欧元(约306美元),就可以买到没有dGPU的入门级英特尔版Zenbook 14X,但它已经配备了Core i7和512GB的存储空间。如果你想要MX450,你至少要花1800欧元(约1833美元)。这种价格上的巨大飞跃使AMD版本(UM5401QA-XXX)变得有趣,即使不包括Thunderbolt。
如果OLED没有发挥很大的作用,那么强大的14英寸产品如 华硕Zenbook 14 UX435EG(MX450)或 HP Envy 14-eb0010nr(GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q)成为问题,其中羡慕14拥有更好的IPS显示屏和最好的显卡,到目前为止在比较领域。
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162
- 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch