华硕Zenbook Flip 14 OLED回顾。归功于AMD和OLED的绝对感觉
正如在以前的评论中所显示的那样，比如说对 华硕Zenbook 14x华硕开始对OLED面板进行标准化，这样不仅高价设备可以享受其优势，而且中端设备也可以。随着华硕Flip 14 OLED的推出，市场上出现了另一款有趣的可折叠机，配备了强大的AMD 5800H以及集成的RX Vega 8 iGPU。OLED面板的刷新率为90赫兹，分辨率为2880x1800，格式为16:10，包括HDR和Pantone认证。最后但并非最不重要的是，该机箱不仅非常坚固和时尚，而且还在点击板上配备了一个集成的数字计算器。
竞争者也提供了良好的设备，如 戴尔Latitude 9420 2合1或 联想Yoga 9i，这两款产品都提供强大的英特尔硬件和同样好的显示屏。OLED显示屏是否足以作为购买的理由？还有什么其他区别？我们在接下来的评论中澄清这些问题。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 82.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 89 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 13.94 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 81.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.5 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 |
外壳：高质量和稳定
华硕Zenbook Flip 14的外壳很有学问，制造质量也很牢固。它由一个铝制底盘组成，不幸的是，它很容易受到指纹的影响。使用该设备时，掌托会略微发热。这款敞篷车几乎可以用一只手打开而不滑落，还提供磁力关闭。 360度铰链在操作过程中保持稳定，但在打字时有点晃动。指纹传感器被集成到电源按钮中。
华硕Zenbook Flip 14是我们比较领域中最轻的设备。它与 戴尔Latitude 9420 2-in-1在尺寸上不相上下。
硬件。华硕Flip 14不含Thunderbolt
端口的范围受到这里的冷却系统的限制。三个细长的冷却口被集中安置在设备的每一侧。总共有六个端口。华硕Zenbook Flip 14没有雷电4，而是有两个USB 3.2 Gen2端口，支持Power Delivery和Displayport。这些端口的位置相互之间有足够的距离，因此在使用上没有任何限制。该设备没有Kensington锁。局域网连接和额外的USB端口在这里需要一个底座
在可用的端口方面。 戴尔的9420二合一有雷电4，而 惠普x360有一个Thunderbolt 4和两个USB-A端口，都比较好。相比之下 戴尔9420，但是，惠普没有Power Delivery或Displayport支持。稍微老一点的 戴尔Inspiron 14 7400在我们的敞篷车旁边表现得更差，因为它的端口更老。瑜伽 瑜伽9i 14有较少的端口，但配备了手写笔和底座。
SD卡阅读器
用我们的AV PRO microSD V60测试的SD卡读卡器的性能，只是刚刚超过平均水平。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
沟通
内置的英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX200实现了非常强大的性能值，并与其他品牌分享了第一名。 联想Yoga 9i.
网络摄像头
笔记本的一个众所周知的问题是网络摄像头的质量。在720p的分辨率下，这里的网络摄像头几乎不能满足日常应用的需要。拍摄文件是不可能的，因为后面缺少第二个网络摄像头，前面的网络摄像头的图像质量相当模糊和嘈杂。此外，你应该寻找一个好的光源，因为图像质量不足以在弱光下进行视频通话。
安全问题
与其他笔记本一样，华硕Zenbook Flip 14的标准配置是TPM。指纹传感器被集成到电源按钮中。
辅料
除了笔记本之外，交货时还包括一个电源装置和通常的文件。这里不包括一支手写笔。
维护
Zenbook Flip 14的外壳可以通过卸下十颗相同长度的Torx螺丝来打开。必须使用T6螺丝刀，并以正确的角度卸下螺丝，因为有些螺丝是略微弯曲的。底盖被紧紧地固定住，必须小心地取出。打开后，可以更换固态硬盘和Wi-Fi卡，并对风扇进行清洁。
担保
华硕Zenbook Flip 14在德国的保修期为24个月。其他国家的条款和条件可能有所不同。
输入设备。经过深思熟虑，非常有用
键盘
键盘的打字感觉是可以接受的，而布局也很清晰，考虑周到。键盘本身有点摇晃，键程较短。另一方面，按键间距足够大，使用过程中的按键噪音也不会让人感觉到烦躁。表面感觉很扎实，键盘有三个级别的背光，包括特殊字符的照明。
触摸板
华硕Zenbook Flip 14的触摸板的滑行性能很好，其尺寸也很合适。响应时间和精确度都很好。此外，触摸板上有一个背光数字板，可以通过触摸触摸板右上角的符号快速激活和停用。此外，通过在触摸板的左侧区域向下移动手指，可以毫不迟疑地激活常用的计算器。启动笔记本电脑时，数字键盘也会自动激活。触摸屏非常精确，对输入的反应非常快。
显示。优秀的触摸屏
这款敞篷车的亮点是显示屏。华硕在所有方面都令人信服：14英寸的16:10格式，分辨率为2800x1800，确保了图像的锐利。此外，这是一个OLED面板，刷新率为90赫兹。除了我们的评测设备，还有另一个带有4K OLED面板的变体，它应该更加明亮，并配有HDR-500认证，而不是我们评测设备中的HDR-400认证。
除了OLED的典型品质--非常快的响应时间、出色的对比度和黑色水平之外，该面板还提供了366烛光的坚实亮度值。我们测试的几乎所有色彩空间都被完全覆盖，工厂校准对于依赖色彩保真度的专业用户来说也是足够的。HDR-400和Pantone认证也是可用的。在测试中，我们无法确定任何PWM闪烁的情况。
如果我们将我们的面板与竞争对手进行比较，它们在几乎所有类别中的表现都更差，除了亮度，华硕Zenbook在这方面属于中游。可以通过MyAsus软件对显示器进行进一步调整。例如，你可以通过 "护眼 "设置使颜色显得更加鲜艳，甚至加强蓝光过滤器。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 366 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.81
ΔE Greyscale 2.32 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W SDC4154, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 Chi Mei 140HCA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng Chi Mei N140HCA-E5B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K Lenovo CSOT3 MNE001EA1-2, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -50% | -13% | -49% | -7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.7 | 42.5 -57% | 80.7 -19% | 42.7 -57% | 94.4 -5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 63.1 -37% | 100 0% | 63.7 -36% | 99.3 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.6 | 44 -55% | 79.7 -19% | 44.2 -55% | 84 -15% |
| Response Times | -1310% | -2070% | -1250% | -1500% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 28.8 ? -1340% | 54 ? -2600% | 32 ? -1500% | 45.6 ? -2180% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 2 ? | 27.6 ? -1280% | 32.8 ? -1540% | 22 ? -1000% | 18.4 ? -820% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -99% | -2% | -62% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 366 | 262.7 -28% | 483.6 32% | 269 -27% | 493 35% |
| Brightness | 369 | 245 -34% | 465 26% | 241 -35% | 453 23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 84 -12% | 92 -4% | 82 -15% | 85 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.11 | 0.3 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.84 | 6.23 -119% | 3.69 -30% | 5.68 -100% | 2.2 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.29 | 22.62 -328% | 5.97 -13% | 9.61 -82% | 5.6 -6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.81 | 1.8 36% | 2.05 27% | 1.2 57% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.32 | 7.1 -206% | 3.5 -51% | 4.95 -113% | 3.6 -55% |
| Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.22 99% | 2.04 108% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 6170 105% | 6241 104% | 6158 106% | 6628 98% | 6754 96% |
| Contrast | 710 | 1511 | 2445 | 1643 | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 44.2 | 75.2 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 63.7 | 99.3 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -486% /
-288% | -695% /
-349% | -454% /
-275% | -499% /
-246% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |   | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在测试中没有检测到用于降低亮度的PWM。这里只使用了直流调光，就像OLED面板通常使用的那样，从50%的亮度开始。敏感的用户应该不会对显示屏有任何问题。
对于户外使用，亮度不足以补偿反射性显示。从照片中可以看出，即使在间接的阳光下，你也会有一段艰难的时间。反射式显示屏和亮度不足的组合使得户外观看不适合。
由于采用了OLED面板，即使在非常宽的视角下也不会出现失真，而且也不会出现显示出血，因为当显示内容为黑色时，像素会关闭。
性能。快速的AMD 5800H处理器
我们的评测设备配备了强大的AMD Ryzen 7 5800H。但那些想要更多性能的人还可以选择购买配备AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX的设备。
AMD 5800H的TDP设定为45W，通过MyAsus软件在性能 模式下也能达到这个数值。在平板电脑模式下，性能 模式被自动禁用，功耗被限制在15W。我们选择性能 模式进行审查。
处理器
凭借内置的AMD 5800H，引擎盖下有足够的动力来击败竞争对手。在Cinebench R15多重持续负载测试中，你可以看到华硕Zenbook Flip 14的性能在整个测试期间平均为1823分。戴尔Inspiron 14以平均1282分的成绩紧随其后，位居中游。惠普Pavilion ，联想Yoga 9和戴尔Latitude 9420二合一的平均分在584至866分之间，在这里排在后面。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 -2! | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 -2! | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (8812 - 13214, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average of class Convertible (616 - 18698, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average of class Convertible (308 - 1980, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1294 - 1441, n=29) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (3430 - 5020, n=31) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average of class Convertible (242 - 7303, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 781, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (502 - 560, n=30) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1487 - 2119, n=28) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 302, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (209 - 234, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (175 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (237 - 340, n=29) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (45773 - 59986, n=28) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5038 - 5632, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (6551 - 9062, n=28) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Convertible (319 - 2062, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1336 - 1505, n=28) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (11.6 - 16.1, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 22.4, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (47.4 - 113, n=29) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (0.511 - 0.559, n=28) | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (10349 - 15169, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (468 - 29594, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (63663 - 95954, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2644 - 114033, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (2096 - 3287, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average of class Convertible (182 - 4841, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (91846 - 99215, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (9962 - 11871, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average of class Convertible (659 - 16315, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (36083 - 52732, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (1420 - 61249, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (50226 - 127832, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (591 - 828, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1243, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5457 - 7884, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (254 - 16065, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (14445 - 25421, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
系统性能
除了PC Mark 10之外，华硕Zenbook Flip 14在系统性能上占优势：在基本要素 类别中，华硕Zenbook Flip 14的系统性能是很好的。 戴尔9420 2-in-1略高于华硕。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (5989 - 6365, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (10112 - 10690, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (9198 - 9729, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (6236 - 6730, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6053 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (34964 - 44180, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (39548 - 47260, n=29) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (28456 - 47022, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (76.3 - 105.1, n=29) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
延迟测试（网页浏览、YouTube 4K、CPU负载）证实了敞篷车适用于实时视频编辑。没有检测到掉帧现象。这适用于我们使用当前驱动程序的测试配置，但这可能会根据驱动程序和硬件更新而发生变化。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
与竞争设备相比，华硕Zenbook的SSD性能属于中等水平。引人注目的是，固态硬盘在测试中并没有提供一致的性能，而是在某些方面减弱，而在另一些方面闪亮。更多细节，请参考个别基准测试。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU
内置的AMD Radeon Vega 8 4000的3DMark性能能够跟得上 惠普x360的Iris XE图形的80 EUs（执行单元）。竞争的设备，如 戴尔Latitude 9420 2合1和 联想Yoga 9i这些设备配备了英特尔Iris XE图形，有96个EUs，比我们的iGPU高出17%至27%。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5632 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18460 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3447 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1383 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
这也反映在游戏性能上：在这里，Iris XE以96 EUs领先8-53%。然而，唯一的例外是《GTA 5》和《Far Cry 5》，其中RX Vega 8以96 EUs略微领先于Iris XE。因此，Zenbook Flip 14只适合在中低端细节上进行要求不高的游戏。
| F1 2021 - 1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
| Average of class Convertible (101.6 - 191.7, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (51.8 - 134, n=22) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| F1 2020 - 1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
| Average of class Convertible (last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (60.1 - 127, n=13) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 89.1 | 78 | 25.4 | 10.45 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 64 | 43 | 21.6 | 15.2 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 105.8 | 87.1 | 50.2 | 47.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 36.1 | 18.7 | 13.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 48.4 | 38.1 | 34 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 43 | 19 | 17.8 | 16.2 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 88.2 | 33.8 | 28.3 | 24.1 |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 94.8 | 43.9 | 33.6 | 23.9 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 91 | 43.2 | 32.7 | 19.8 |
排放。以牺牲噪音为代价的高性能
噪声
闲置时，风扇是无声的。这基本上对应的是Whisper 模式，这是三种可能的可调节的风扇配置文件之一。在标准 模式下，风扇动态运行，根据负载加速或减速，这在日常使用中几乎不会造成困扰。整个审查是在性能 模式下进行的--在这里，风扇的特性是相似的，但不同的是，在要求不高的任务中，如冲浪或使用微软办公室工作时，风扇以非常低的速度持续运行。一旦你同时运行几个任务并播放视频或音乐，风扇就会随着负载的增加而变得更加响亮。当游戏或运行要求更高的程序（如Photoshop）时，风扇很快达到最大，但仍然表现得很动态。在这样的情况下，这两个风扇是可以明显感觉到的，因为我们发现动态行为比风扇以稳定的速度运行时更令人讨厌。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 26 / 26 / 27.3 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 39.8 / 42.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W Vega 8, R7 5800H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 9% | 3% | -1% | 9% | |
| off / environment * | 26 | 25.4 2% | 27 -4% | 24.9 4% | 24.3 7% |
| Idle Minimum * | 26 | 25.4 2% | 27 -4% | 24.9 4% | 24.3 7% |
| Idle Average * | 26 | 25.4 2% | 27 -4% | 28.3 -9% | 24.3 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.3 | 25.4 7% | 27 1% | 29.5 -8% | 24.3 11% |
| Load Average * | 39.8 | 25.4 36% | 38.3 4% | 39.7 -0% | 35.7 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 42.4 | 41.3 3% | 33.2 22% | 39.7 6% | 37.3 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.3 | 39.7 | 37.5 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在笔记本电脑模式下进行游戏时，Zenbook Flip 14的掌托和底部明显变热。因此，在这种情况下，不建议在膝上操作。键盘和触摸板不受影响，在平板电脑模式的游戏中没有明显的发热现象。然而，在出厂设置下，平板电脑模式下的设备性能会自动节流50%以上，对性能配置文件的访问被阻止。另一方面，对于日常工作，在膝上操作是可能的，没有任何问题，无论是在笔记本电脑还是平板电脑模式下。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.1 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-3.9 °C / -7 F).
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 10% | 9% | 15% | 15% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42.7 | 39.4 8% | 43.4 -2% | 38.9 9% | 42 2% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 53.1 | 51 4% | 48 10% | 40.3 24% | 48.6 8% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32.9 | 26.2 20% | 29.8 9% | 31.8 3% | 25.3 23% |
| Idle Bottom * | 35.2 | 32.4 8% | 28 20% | 27.4 22% | 25.5 28% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试中，CPU达到了4.4GHz的最大可能值，峰值温度为93摄氏度。然后时钟速度下降到略低于3.7GHz，评测设备可以保持这个速度。CPU风扇以最大速度运行，设备保持在所安装的Ryzen 7 5800H的80摄氏度的水平。因此，即使在极端情况下也能保持指定的TDP为45瓦。如果通过Prime 95充分使用CPU，所安装的iGPU AMD Radeon RX Vega 8的GPU时钟就会从2000MHz下降到1550MHz。
在TheWitcher 3，安装的RX Vega 8可以保持2000兆赫的最大时钟速度，并稳定在62摄氏度。AMD 5800H在这里的负载相当轻，显示的时钟频率为3.2至4.2 GHz，取决于核心的负载。这里还值得注意的是，耗电量只有34瓦，而不是45瓦。有一点很清楚：安装在这里的iGPU正在以其极限运行，但处理器却没有。简而言之：CPU和GPU都被节流了。不过，这种极端情况在日常使用中几乎不可能发生，因此，从已完成的基准测试中可以看出，这里没有什么缺点可言。
发言人
华硕Zenbook Flip 14的扬声器发出的声音可以接受，但它们可以使用更多的音量和低音。中音和高音是平衡的。扬声器对于视频和流媒体服务也是足够的。然而，如果你喜欢听大音量的音乐，并且是一个低音爱好者，你应该选择戴尔9420二合一产品。
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理。平衡的运行时间
消耗功率
虽然华硕Zenbook Flip 14的电池容量最大，为63Wh，但它的能耗也最大。OLED显示屏是导致华硕Zenbook Flip 14能耗普遍较高的原因，尤其是在空转时。戴尔 戴尔Latitude 9420 2合1闲置时的能耗要低30%以上，这在电池寿命方面也很明显。在负载情况下，戴尔的设备仍有超过20%的差距。惠普 惠普Pavilion x360的表现甚至更好，由于内置的i5，其平均消耗量减少了40%，除其他外。
| Off / Standby | 0.5 / 0.5 Watt |
| Idle | 6.4 / 9.4 / 10.7 Watt |
| Load |
52.2 / 69 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 R7 5700U, Vega 8, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 30% | 13% | 40% | 9% | 15% | 8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.4 | 4.5 30% | 4.6 28% | 4 37% | 4.2 34% | 5.26 ? 18% | 5.18 ? 19% |
| Idle Average * | 9.4 | 6.5 31% | 7.8 17% | 6.7 29% | 10 -6% | 7.78 ? 17% | 8.18 ? 13% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.7 | 7.1 34% | 8.2 23% | 8.2 23% | 13.2 -23% | 9.18 ? 14% | 11.1 ? -4% |
| Load Average * | 52.2 | 40.4 23% | 47.9 8% | 29.6 43% | 42.4 19% | 44.9 ? 14% | 46.8 ? 10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53 | 31.7 40% | 38.8 27% | 29.6 44% | 43 19% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 69 | 54.3 21% | 87.1 -26% | 26.7 61% | 60.5 12% | 59.4 ? 14% | 67.2 ? 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption with external monitor
电池寿命
在我们的WiFi测试中，Zenbook的测试时间为522分钟，成绩不错。利用快速充电功能，Flip 14可以在不到两小时内完全充电。尽管如此，戴尔在这两款测试设备上都占据了优势。这款 Latitude 9420二合一在Wi-Fi测试中提供了699分钟的高峰值。
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8, 63 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 43 Wh | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 R7 5700U, Vega 8, 54 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -2% | -14% | 26% | 17% | 16% | |
| H.264 | 542 | 593 9% | 535 -1% | 765 ? 41% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 522 | 531 2% | 427 -18% | 699 34% | 647 24% | 599 ? 15% |
| Load | 124 | 103 -17% | 97 -22% | 146 18% | 137 10% | 113.1 ? -9% |
| Reader / Idle | 1059 | 1721 | 1115 | 1330 ? |
Pros
Cons
评语：华硕敞篷车中的顶级OLED面板
华硕以其Zenbook Flip 14 OLED为市场带来了一款可靠的可转换产品，它以16:10格式的优秀OLED面板和90赫兹的刷新率而得分。此外，所有测试的色彩空间都给出了出色的结果，因此这款14英寸的设备适用于依赖真实色彩的专业用户。高品质和优雅的外壳可以在笔记本电脑和平板电脑模式之间进行360度的平衡，没有任何复杂的问题。触摸屏对所有输入的反应非常迅速，而点击板上有一个内置的数字计算器。精心设计的键盘布局与敞篷车的尺寸非常匹配，提供了坚实的输入体验。AMD 5800H提供了很高的系统性能，因此在竞争设备中占主导地位。然而，Zenbook Flip 14不适合游戏迷，因为内置的Radeon RX Vega 8对游戏的适用性非常有限。
不幸的是，高性能是有代价的，这一点从噪音和废热中可以明显感觉到。此外，我们还希望有更多种类的端口。因此，那些需要大量端口的人可能不得不求助于一个对接站。此外，这款机箱极易沾染指纹，在高负荷情况下发热非常厉害。我们还希望扬声器的音量和低音更大。那些希望在户外使用这台可折叠机的人将不得不找一个阴凉的地方，因为已经高度反射的显示屏没有足够的亮度。
华硕在Zenbook Flip 14 OLED上做对了很多事情，特别是在优秀的显示屏与高系统性能和便携性的结合方面。然而，这款敞篷车也有一些弱点，这对一些用户来说应该不会构成问题。
这款 戴尔Latitude 9420 2合1对于那些寻求更长的电池寿命和希望偶尔以可接受的细节和FPS玩游戏的人来说，只要你能不使用优秀的OLED屏幕，那么戴尔9420二合一绝对是更好的选择。如果你喜欢4K面板，而且还想在户外使用，那么 联想瑜伽9i 14 4K会更适合，尤其是联想提供了双雷电4端口，还在上面装了手写笔和USB集线器。
价格和可用性
截至发稿时，华硕Zenbook Flip 14 OLED已通过美国亚马逊上市。售价为1,099.99美元。
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
- 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Patrick Schüdzig
Price comparison
