戴尔Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2合1评论。预算中的高性能
Latitude 和XPS型号迎合了专业消费者或商业用户的需求,而Inspiron系列则针对家庭用户、学生和预算较紧的普通观众。机型范围从非常便宜的Inspiron 3000系列到中档的Inspiron 5000至7000系列。
我们这里的设备是14英寸Inspiron 14 7415二合一,零售价约为900至1000美元。虽然它听起来像普通的Inspiron 14 7400蛤壳,但有360度铰链,其物理设计和功能实际上是非常不同的,我们在下面的评论中会显示。SKU的范围从配备8GB内存的AMD Ryzen 5500U CPU到配备16GB内存的Ryzen 7 5700U,而16:9的14英寸1080p触摸屏在所有选项中都是固定的。英特尔第11代Tiger Lake ,也可通过Inspiron 14 5410 2-in-1提供选择,该机共享相同的机箱。
这一领域的竞争者包括其他经济实惠的14英寸可转换笔记本电脑,如 惠普Pavilion x360 14, 联想IdeaPad Flex 5 14, Acer Spin 3, 或华硕VivoBook Flip 14.
更多戴尔评论。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
81.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.5 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.3 % v7 (old) | Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350 | 1.3 kg | 17 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | ||
82.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 21.4 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.2 % v7 (old) | Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
80.7 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2020 | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA R7 4700U, Vega 7 | 1.6 kg | 18.2 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
案例 - 看起来像个专业人士Latitude
机箱是铝和塑料的组合,具有相当高端的视觉设计,特别是当与其他廉价的可转换产品如HPPavilion x360 14或联想IdeaPad Flex 5相比。然而,机箱的刚性,与价格较高的笔记本电脑相比还差了几步,如 Latitude 7400 2合1或惠普Spectre x360 13。例如,盖子和底座的四角更容易弯曲,而骨架感觉比用于Latitude 或Spectre系统的材料薄得多。即便如此,Inspiron 14 7415仍然是其预算类别中外观和手感更好的机型之一。
机箱尺寸比许多竞争对手略小,同时也同样沉重,给人以更密集的感觉。例如,IdeaPad Flex 5 14、VivoBook Flip 14和宏碁Spin 3 SP314都有更厚的边框,因此尺寸更大,但所有四个型号在其他方面的重量都差不多。
连接性--没有Thunderbolt的你
端口选项在物理上与Inspiron 14 7400相同,只是稍作了重新安排。这里的USB-C端口不支持Thunderbolt,就像通常基于AMD的笔记本电脑一样,但它至少支持DisplayPort和Power Delivery,分别用于连接外部显示器和USB-C交流适配器。我们希望至少多一个USB-C端口,即使这意味着完全放弃专有的桶状交流适配器端口。
不支持Thunderbolt,因为戴尔希望用户升级到Latitude 或XPS以获得此类高级功能。即使是英特尔驱动的Inspiron 14 5410二合一版本也不包括对Thunderbolt的支持。
SD卡阅读器
从弹簧式MicroSD读卡器的传输速度很慢。将1GB的照片从我们的UHS-II测试卡移动到桌面需要大约38秒,而惠普Pavilion x360 14的时间不到一半。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
通信 - Wi-Fi 6是标准配置
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng |
网络摄像头 - 无Windows Hello支持的快门
维护 - 易于维修
底部面板只需一把飞利浦螺丝刀就能轻松拆下,露出2个SODIMM插槽、M.2 PCIe SSD和WLAN。我们赞赏Inspiron在需要时很容易维修,这对于廉价的可转换笔记本电脑来说通常不是这样的。
配件和保修
除了交流适配器和文件,盒子里没有任何额外的东西。我们的包装中默认带有一个USB-C交流适配器,但用户可以选择收到一个专有的桶状适配器,因为笔记本电脑可以支持这两种适配器。
标准的一年有限制造商保修适用。
输入设备--标准超极本博览会
触摸板
Precision 点击板比价格较高的戴尔latitude 14 9410二合一电脑上的点击板大(11.5 x 7厘米,10.5 x 6厘米),便于多点触摸输入。无论速度快慢,光标控制都很可靠,但如果以较慢的速度滑行,光滑的表面会感到适度的粘性。在点击板上的点击是海绵状的,需要比我们希望的更多的力量,这在一段时间后会使手指感到疲惫。
显示 - 有限的sRGB覆盖范围
戴尔在其Inspiron 14 3493上使用了相同的奇美140HCA IPS面板。 灵感14 3493和Inspiron 14 7415二合一。不幸的是,这是一款预算面板,其有限的色彩范围、平均对比度和平均响应时间就是例证。虽然竞争机型如 惠普Pavilion x360或 华硕VivoBook Flip具有类似的属性,但太糟糕的是,Inspiron 7415 2-in-1没有配备与Inspiron 14 7400相同的面板。 灵感14 7400它提供了更深的色彩、更高的原始分辨率和更快的响应时间,减少了重影。
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 262.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 710:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.8
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 Chi Mei 140HCA, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng Chi Mei N140HCA-E5B, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW Chi Mei CMN1411, IPS, 14.5", 2560x1600 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE 5D10S39642 LCD MODULE W 81X1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 BOE081D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA BOE NV140FHM-N49, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 54% | -3% | -8% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 42.5 | 42.7 0% | 65.8 55% | 41.24 -3% | 39.25 -8% | 40.47 -5% |
sRGB Coverage | 63.1 | 63.7 1% | 97.4 54% | 61.4 -3% | 58.2 -8% | 60 -5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44 | 44.2 0% | 67.9 54% | 42.67 -3% | 40.55 -8% | 41.81 -5% |
Response Times | 5% | 23% | 12% | 21% | -18% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.8 ? | 32 ? -11% | 29 ? -1% | 30 ? -4% | 29 ? -1% | 36.4 ? -26% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.6 ? | 22 ? 20% | 15 ? 46% | 20 ? 28% | 16 ? 42% | 30.4 ? -10% |
PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | |||||
Screen | 51% | 35% | 28% | 43% | -7% | |
Brightness middle | 262.7 | 269 2% | 360 37% | 243 -7% | 271 3% | 272.5 4% |
Brightness | 245 | 241 -2% | 327 33% | 221 -10% | 272 11% | 260 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 82 -2% | 83 -1% | 79 -6% | 92 10% | 88 5% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.11 70% | 0.45 -22% | 0.16 57% | 0.19 49% | 0.42 -14% |
Contrast | 710 | 2445 244% | 800 13% | 1519 114% | 1426 101% | 649 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.23 | 5.68 9% | 2.04 67% | 6.03 3% | 4.24 32% | 4.65 25% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 22.62 | 9.61 58% | 4.69 79% | 9.21 59% | 6.38 72% | 17.78 21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.8 | 0.92 49% | 4.34 -141% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 4.95 30% | 2.84 60% | 6.4 10% | 2.51 65% | 4.4 38% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.17 101% | 2.34 94% | 2.41 91% | 2.25 98% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6241 104% | 6628 98% | 6360 102% | 6342 102% | 6812 95% | 6984 93% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 44.2 | 62 | 39 | 37 | 38.4 | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 63.7 | 97 | 61 | 58 | 59.8 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 19% /
32% | 37% /
37% | 12% /
18% | 19% /
28% | -10% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示屏的sRGB覆盖率仅为63%,而大多数价格较高的中端至高端超极本或可转换本的覆盖率则超过90%,如 微星Summit E13 Flip.甚至Inspiron 14 7400蛤壳也有一个1600p的显示屏选项,几乎完全覆盖sRGB。
色温开箱后太暖,导致灰度和颜色不准确。幸运的是,在正确校准后,这是一个容易解决的问题,因为平均灰度和颜色的DeltaE值在校准后将分别下降到0.8和1.8。请注意,由于上述面板的色彩空间有限,较高的饱和度水平仍然表现不佳。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于光泽的覆盖层和相对较暗的背光,在户外几乎总是会有一些眩光。请确保通过Radeon软件禁用AMD Vari-Bright,否则在电池供电的情况下,最大亮度会自动下降。如果户外能见度是一个问题,用户可能要考虑XPS 2-in-1,因为它的显示屏更亮。
业绩
用户可以选择6核 Ryzen 5 5500U或8核Ryzen 7 5700U,两者都有集成Radeon RX显卡。另外,英特尔Tiger Lake-U选项可通过视觉上相同的Inspiron 14 5410二合一系列提供,尽管起价更高。我们感谢戴尔的所有SKU都配备了双通道内存,因为单通道内存会严重影响图形性能。
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们的设备被设置为高性能模式,以获得尽可能高的分数。
处理器
多线程性能可能比我们数据库中配备相同的笔记本电脑的平均速度慢15%。 Ryzen 7 5700UCPU。笔记本 联想IdeaPad Flex 5例如,它能够维持更快的时钟频率,因此比我们的戴尔设备的原始性能更快,尽管它配备了相同的处理器。Inspiron 14 7415尽管多线程性能略微令人失望,但仍然非常快。
选择较小的Ryzen 5 5500U可能带来比我们的Ryzen 7配置慢20%的多线程性能。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (2309 - 3877, n=19) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (478 - 495, n=19) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (6649 - 10139, n=18) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (1177 - 1268, n=18) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (1130 - 1691, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (184 - 190, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (292 - 427, n=18) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (4476 - 4620, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (32529 - 47501, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (1105 - 1205, n=17) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (4254 - 7635, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (6.97 - 12.1, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (52.4 - 68.5, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (0.567 - 0.641, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
PCMark基准测试通常高于许多竞争系统,特别是在数字内容创作方面,图形性能是关键。然而,在使用的头几天,预计会有大量来自各种预装的戴尔应用程序的弹出通知。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (4775 - 5518, n=13) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (8347 - 10091, n=13) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (7001 - 8457, n=13) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (4583 - 5964, n=13) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5350 points | |
Help |
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签和运行Prime95压力时,有轻微的DPC延时问题。在我们长达1分钟的测试视频中,4K视频在60FPS下的播放非常流畅,只有一个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Inspiron配备了一个中档的WD SN530 NVMe固态硬盘。顺序读取和写入率最高分别为2400MB/s和1750MB/s,而高端的三星PM981a则超过3000MB/s。如下图所示,我们的测试装置在循环运行DiskSpd读取时,似乎有问题达到硬盘的最大传输率。传输速率首先只达到500MB/s,然后稳步攀升到2400MB/s范围,而不是在整个过程中提供完整的2400MB/s。
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G | Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0 | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 30% | 97% | 18% | -7% | 10% | |
Seq Read | 2018 | 2027 0% | 2891 43% | 2011 0% | 1871 -7% | 1397 -31% |
Seq Write | 1121 | 1057 -6% | 1398 25% | 1080 -4% | 703 -37% | 783 -30% |
4K Read | 32.45 | 52.7 62% | 56.1 73% | 55.2 70% | 45.97 42% | 48.08 48% |
4K Write | 125.5 | 133.5 6% | 138.4 10% | 127 1% | 119.3 -5% | 134.6 7% |
4K-64 Read | 749 | 1257 68% | 1137 52% | 589 -21% | 614 -18% | 835 11% |
4K-64 Write | 418.5 | 736 76% | 1904 355% | 976 133% | 367.1 -12% | 734 75% |
Access Time Read * | 0.078 | 0.068 13% | 0.052 33% | 0.117 -50% | 0.084 -8% | 0.081 -4% |
Access Time Write * | 0.164 | 0.182 -11% | 0.022 87% | 0.053 68% | 0.038 77% | 0.084 49% |
Score Read | 983 | 1512 54% | 1482 51% | 845 -14% | 847 -14% | 1022 4% |
Score Write | 656 | 975 49% | 2183 233% | 1211 85% | 557 -15% | 947 44% |
Score Total | 2102 | 3221 53% | 4359 107% | 2460 17% | 1792 -15% | 2474 18% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1136 | 1564 38% | 982 -14% | 1168 3% | 1212 7% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 544 | 569 5% | 566 4% | 459.8 -15% | 374.3 -31% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1082 | 1184 9% | 838 -23% | 283 -74% | 829 -23% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 17% | 21% | -6% | -10% | -9% | |
Write 4K | 121 | 201.5 67% | 127 5% | 98.5 -19% | 165.2 37% | 121.2 0% |
Read 4K | 44.08 | 56.3 28% | 42.72 -3% | 52.6 19% | 55 25% | 49.91 13% |
Write Seq | 1728 | 1485 -14% | 2025 17% | 1149 -34% | 1015 -41% | 1090 -37% |
Read Seq | 1758 | 1624 -8% | 2205 25% | 1872 6% | 1125 -36% | 1533 -13% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 376.6 | 505 34% | 465 23% | 370.6 -2% | 423.6 12% | 393.3 4% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 405.6 | 620 53% | 376.4 -7% | 507 25% | 483.8 19% | 406 0% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1844 | 1520 -18% | 3020 64% | 1154 -37% | 648 -65% | 1225 -34% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2477 | 2246 -9% | 3478 40% | 2248 -9% | 1802 -27% | 2277 -8% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 24% /
25% | 59% /
65% | 6% /
9% | -9% /
-8% | 1% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
与表现稍差的处理器一样,集成GPU的表现也比预期的要慢。3DMark的结果比我们数据库中配备相同的笔记本电脑的平均速度慢15%左右。 Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU.它的速度仍然足以在低到中等设置下玩大多数游戏,包括《DOTA 2》和《堡垒之夜》,但它比竞争者的速度低了几步。 Iris Xe Graphics G7现在大多数更高端的超极本上都有。选择英特尔版本的Inspiron将意味着牺牲一些处理器性能来换取更高的图形性能。
图形性能可以更稳定。当闲置在 Witcher 3 在低设置下空转一小时,帧率在测试开始时高达60FPS,然后随着时间的推移波动到低50和高50FPS的范围,如下图所示。
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1694 - 5041, n=54) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (540 - 1557, n=54) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Score | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (620 - 1781, n=55) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (3459 - 7591, n=54) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1708 - 5798, n=54) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA |
3DMark 11 Performance | 5597 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20246 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3079 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1100 points | |
Help |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (21.9 - 50.1, n=52) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (11.7 - 25, n=47) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (7.71 - 17.7, n=46) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 87.2 | 76.5 | 23.9 | 9.42 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 62.1 | 20.8 | 13.2 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 94.5 | 75.3 | 46.9 | 43 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 31.9 | 16.3 | 11.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.3 | 30.8 | 26.6 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 40 | 17 | 16 | 15 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 75.6 | 29.7 | 24.9 | 21 |
Emissions
系统噪音 - 高音的风扇噪音
在浏览或视频流等低负载期间,风扇噪音几乎难以察觉,只有26.4或27.1分贝(A),而安静的背景是24.3分贝(A)。当运行3DMark 06的第一个基准场景时,风扇噪音最高为35.7 dB(A),比戴尔Inspiron 14 7400或联想IdeaPad Flex 5安静得多。游戏时的风扇噪音只有37.5 dB(A),稍微大一点。
不幸的是,风扇在较高的转速下运行时是高调的,这使得它比它应该有的更明显,尽管风扇噪音总体上相对较低。
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G | Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i5-1035G4, SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0 | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | -16% | -10% | 1% | -10% | |
off / environment * | 24.3 | 27 -11% | 27.6 -14% | 25.6 -5% | 24.9 -2% | 27.1 -12% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.3 | 27 -11% | 27.6 -14% | 25.6 -5% | 24.9 -2% | 27.1 -12% |
Idle Average * | 24.3 | 27 -11% | 27.6 -14% | 25.6 -5% | 24.9 -2% | 27.1 -12% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.3 | 27 -11% | 27.6 -14% | 25.6 -5% | 26 -7% | 27.1 -12% |
Load Average * | 35.7 | 38.3 -7% | 43.8 -23% | 43.3 -21% | 32.6 9% | 35 2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.5 | 43.7 -17% | 41.3 -10% | |||
Load Maximum * | 37.3 | 33.2 11% | 43.8 -17% | 43.6 -17% | 32.8 12% | 41.3 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.3 / 24.3 / 24.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 35.7 / 37.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A) |
温度
表面温度比我们在Inspiron 14 7400蛤壳上记录的温度要低得多。在我们的敞篷车上,顶部和底部表面的热点将分别达到40摄氏度和51摄氏度,而Inspiron 14 7400在长时间运行类似要求的负载时,每侧的温度为58摄氏度。即便如此,该系统的运行温度仍然略高于一些竞争机型,如联想IdeaPad Flex 5或Acer Spin 3 SP314这些机型的热点往往在40摄氏度到45摄氏度的范围内,而不是在更冷的地方。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.3 °C / 0.6 F).
压力测试
当运行Prime95时,CPU会在第一秒左右提升到3.8GHz,然后在接下来的几分钟内下降到3.4GHz和90℃。如下面的截图所示,时钟频率和温度最终会进一步下降,然后分别稳定在2.7 GHz和69 C。因此,Turbo Boost的可持续性还不错,但远不及Ryzen 7 5700U在更高TDP水平上的能力。
运行时,GPU时钟速率和温度将稳定在1525 MHz和62 C左右。 Witcher 3相比之下,1900 MHz和69 C的 HP Envy x360 15使用相同的Ryzen 7 5700U处理器。
用电池供电运行不会限制性能。在电池上运行的3DMark 11将返回物理和图形分数,分别为9853和5436分,而在主电源上则为9321和5579分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 43 |
Prime95压力 | 2.7 | -- | 69 |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 2.6 | 820 | 67 |
Witcher 3 Stress | ~1.4 | ~1525 | 62 |
发言人
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management
消耗功率
在桌面上空转只需4瓦到8瓦,与现在大多数其他副笔记本一致。当运行更高的负载(如游戏)时,消耗量将介于采用酷睿i5处理器的惠普Pavilion x360 14和采用酷睿i7处理器的 XPG Xenia 14或 框架13.5.多线程处理器性能和图形性能分别比第11代英特尔酷睿U系列慢和快,这意味着每瓦性能可能更低或更高,这取决于工作负载。
在运行极端负载时,我们能够从小型(约11.2 x 5 x 2.8厘米)交流适配器中记录到暂时最大的54.3瓦。当运行 Witcher 3时,功耗会从40瓦左右的高点开始,然后随着时间的推移稳步下降到低至30瓦。
Off / Standby | 0.46 / 0.67 Watt |
Idle | 4.5 / 6.5 / 7.1 Watt |
Load |
40.4 / 54.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 R7 5700U, Vega 8, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE R5 5500U, Vega 7, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA R7 4700U, Vega 7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 13% | -15% | -12% | 9% | 6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.5 | 4 11% | 3.1 31% | 5.6 -24% | 3.4 24% | 4 11% |
Idle Average * | 6.5 | 6.7 -3% | 7.3 -12% | 6.5 -0% | 6 8% | 6.4 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.1 | 8.2 -15% | 9 -27% | 7 1% | 7.9 -11% | 7 1% |
Load Average * | 40.4 | 29.6 27% | 47 -16% | 45.4 -12% | 39.6 2% | 34.6 14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 31.7 | 29.6 7% | 46 -45% | 45.4 -43% | 35 -10% | |
Load Maximum * | 54.3 | 26.7 51% | 65.4 -20% | 50 8% | 41 24% | 45.1 17% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
电池寿命 - 适合全天使用
运行时间非常好,从大小适中的54Wh电池中实际使用WLAN近11小时。结果比我们在竞争产品惠普Pavilion x360 14或宏碁Spin 3 SP314上记录的时间长几个小时,同时与联想IdeaPad Flex 5相当。配备较小的41Wh电池的SKU可用于较低的起始重量。
从空电到满电大约需要两个小时。
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 R7 5700U, Vega 8, 54 Wh | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 43 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, 52 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05-82HU006NGE R5 5500U, Vega 7, 52.5 Wh | Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 48 Wh | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA R7 4700U, Vega 7, 42 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -23% | -32% | -23% | -29% | -26% | |
Reader / Idle | 1115 | 1059 -5% | 835 -25% | 842 -24% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 647 | 427 -34% | 438 -32% | 705 9% | 451.9 -30% | 479 -26% |
Load | 137 | 97 -29% | 65 -53% | 93 -32% | ||
Witcher 3 ultra | 99 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 坚实的基本面
除了我们的戴尔Inspiron 14之外,还有少数廉价的可转换设备可供选择,包括华硕VivoBook Flip 14,Acer Spin 3 SP314,联想IdeaPad Flex 5, 或惠普Pavilion x360 14.戴尔的主要优势是,对于喜欢安装自己的内存或存储设备的用户来说,它易于维修,与上述替代品的预算外观和感觉相比,它的底盘和铰链更坚固,可能更持久。
扎实的基础知识,强大的底盘和强大的处理器。没有巨大的惊喜,这对于一个预算的可折叠机来说是完全可以接受的。
触摸屏的颜色有限是个遗憾,特别是由于AMD的处理器足够强大,可以偶尔进行图片编辑。然而,这也是其他廉价的14英寸敞篷车所共有的一个缺点。
宏碁Spin 3仍然是为数不多的(如果不是唯一的)支持Thunderbolt的经济型14英寸敞篷车之一,适合那些不能没有该功能的用户。
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1
- 12/05/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo