英特尔酷睿i5-13400F台式机CPU回顾。经济实惠的10核处理器,适合游戏和工作
英特尔通过Alder Lake系列推出了混合CPU架构,将所谓的P和E核心结合在一个散热片下。到目前为止,E-cores在入门级CPU中被省略了,这主要影响了多线程性能。随着第13代酷睿的诞生,英特尔终于在6个P核的基础上给酷睿i5-13400F增加了4个E核。因此,它现在可以与 英特尔酷睿i5-12600K的Alder Lake系列。然而,这两个型号在功耗方面有很大的不同。然而,在性能方面,这两种型号只有几个百分点的差距,在这一点上我们可以透露一下。
英特尔Alder-Lake和英特尔Raptor-Lake都共享socket 1700作为子结构。因此,所有新的处理器也可以在旧的600芯片组上运行。不过,应事先进行BIOS更新,以便识别和正确支持最新的处理器。谈到桤木湖和猛禽湖。英特尔酷睿i5-13400F可以选择B0或C0步进。B0步进指的是猛禽湖DIE,而Alder-Lake DIE则在C0步进的散热器下面。
在下表中,我们为您整理了新的Raptor Lake S系列最重要的代表。的更多细节 英特尔酷睿i5-13400F可以在这里找到.
英特尔的酷睿处理器的比较
型号 | 核心 / 线程 |
时钟 P-Core / Turbo | 时钟 E-Core / Turbo | 缓存 L2 + L3 | 图形 | PBP | MTB | 价格(MSRP) |
Core i9-13900K | 24 (8P + 16E) /32 | 3.0 GHz / 5.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz / 4.3 GHz | 32 + 36 MB | UHD 770 | 125 Watt | 253 Watt | $ 589 |
Core i9-13900KF | 16 (8P + 16E) /32 | 3.0 GHz / 5.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz / 4.3 GHz | 32 + 36 MB | - | 125 Watt | 253 Watt | $ 564 |
Core i9-12900K | 16 (8P + 8E) /24 | 3.2 GHz / 5.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz / 3.9 GHz | 14 + 30 MB | UHD 770 | 125 Watt | 241 Watt | $ 589 |
Core i9-12900KF | 16 (8P + 8E) /24 | 3.2 GHz / 5.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz / 3.9 GHz | 14 + 30 MB | - | 125 Watt | 241 Watt | $ 564 |
Core i7-13700K | 16 (8P + 8E) /24 | 3.4 GHz / 5.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz / 4.2 GHz | 24 + 30 MB | UHD 770 | 125 瓦 | 253 瓦 | $409 |
Core i7-13700KF | 16 (8P + 8E) /24 | 3.4 GHz / 5.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz / 4.2 GHz | 24 + 30 MB | - | 125 Watt | 253 Watt | $ 384 |
Core i7-12700K | 12 (8P + 4E) /20 | 3.6 GHz / 4.9 GHz | 2.7 GHz / 3.8 GHz | 12 + 25 MB | UHD 770 | 125 Watt | 190 Watt | $409 |
Core i7-12700KF | 12 (8P + 4E) /20 | 3.6 GHz / 4.9 GHz | 2.7 GHz / 3.8 GHz | 12 + 25 MB | - | 125 Watt | 190 Watt | $ 384 |
Core i5-13600K | 14 (6P + 8E) /20 | 3.5 GHz / 5.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz / 3.9 GHz | 20 + 24 MB | UHD 770 | 125 瓦 | 181 瓦 | $ 319 |
Core i5-13600KF | 14 (6P + 8E) /20 | 3.5 GHz / 5.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz / 3.9 GHz | 20 + 24 MB | - | 125瓦 | 181瓦 | $ 294 |
Core i5-12600K | 10 (6P + 4E) /16 | 3.7 GHz / 4.9 GHz | 2.8 GHz / 3.6 GHz | 9.5 + 20 MB | UHD 770 | 125 Watts | 150 Watts | $ 289 |
Core i5-12600KF | 10 (6P + 4E) /16 | 3.7 GHz / 4.9 GHz | 2.8 GHz / 3.6 GHz | 9.5 + 20 MB | - | 125 Watt | 150 Watt | $ 264 |
Core i5-13400F | 10 (6P + 4E) /16 | 2.5 GHz / 4.6GHz | 1.8 GHz / 3.3GHz | 9.5 + 20 MB | - | 65 Watt | 148Watt | $ 196 |
Core i5-12400F | 6 (6P + 0E) /12 | 2.5 GHz / 4.4 GHz | - | 7.5 + 18 MB | - | 65瓦 | 117瓦 | $ 194 |
关于我们测试系统的细节
- Streacom BC1 V2开放式工作台
- 英特尔酷睿i5-13400F
- 华硕ROG Maximus Z690 Hero (BIOS v2204)
- 定制环形水冷系统(泵:Alphacool Aquastream XT Ultra,散热器:EK MO-RA3 420 LT BLACK)
- NvidiaGeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition (驱动:528.02)
- EVGA SuperNOVA P+ 1600W
- G.Skill Ripjaws S5 (2x 16 GB - DDR5-5200 MT/s)
- 英特尔Optane 905p (480 GB系统+基准测试)
- 西部数据SN720 (游戏)
- 微软Windows 11专业版64位(版本22H2)
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
测试条件 - Z690在更新BIOS后仍可使用
我们继续使用华硕ROG Maximus Z690 Hero作为本次测试的基础,自推出以来,它已经是我们的选择。 Alder-Lake处理器以来,它一直是我们的选择。.在经历了一些问题后,我们在测试过程中遇到的问题是 英特尔酷睿i9-13900K遇到一些问题后,我们在测试英特尔酷睿i9-13900K时遇到了一些问题。英特尔酷睿i5-13400F.安装了最新的BIOS v2204,以便启动英特尔酷睿i5-13400F。幸运的是,华硕ROG Maximus Z690 Hero提供了更新BIOS的可能性,无需CPU和内存。
所有测试都是在最新的BIOS和启用XMP1配置文件的情况下进行的。此外,所有的功率限制被禁用,以获得处理器的全部性能。
处理器基准测试
不幸的是,我们目前无法与英特尔酷睿i5-12400F进行直接的性能比较。然而,我们的数据库中有许多其他处理器,可以作为参考。因此,我们看到英特尔酷睿i5-13400F与英特尔酷睿i7-12700F相比,优势很小。平均而言,英特尔酷睿i5-13400F可以取得更好的结果,尽管缺少线程肯定会导致个别测试中的得分更低。我们看到,在直接与AMD Ryzen 7 5800X的比较中,情况几乎相同。 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X.与英特尔酷睿i5-13400F一样,后者提供16个线程,但在纯多线程基准测试中可以获得更好的分数。
如果你需要更多性能,你可以选择英特尔酷睿i5-13600K。这里有大约20%的性能提升。同样的性能增长也可以通过一个 AMD Ryzen 7 7700X.
更多关于处理器的基准测试可以在以下网站找到这里.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
Cinebench R23 | |
Single Core | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
Multi Core | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K |
wPrime 2.10 | |
32m | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
1024m | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | |
Pass 1 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
Pass 2 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
WinRAR - Result | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
TrueCrypt | |
AES Mean 100MB | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Twofish Mean 100MB | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
Serpent Mean 100MB | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Multi-Core | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
Single-Core | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
Geekbench 5.0 | |
5.0 Multi-Core | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
5.0 Single-Core | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
* ... smaller is better
英特尔酷睿i5-13400F与Cinebench R15多循环对比
在压力测试中,我们用Cinebench R15连续循环运行,在稳定的电源发展方面没有问题。英特尔允许酷睿i5-13400F的最大功率为148瓦,冷却系统没有受到特别的挑战。英特尔酷睿i5-13400F只比英特尔酷睿i5-12600K稍慢,在所有50次运行中平均为2338分。 英特尔酷睿i5-12600K(2,545分)。
合成基准和应用性能
英特尔酷睿i5-13400F在应用基准测试中也能取得很好的成绩,相当于一个 英特尔酷睿i5-12600K在性能方面相当。与这里列出的猛禽湖处理器的K模型相比,我们的审查样本不得不接受一个明显的赤字,虽然。尽管如此,英特尔酷睿i5-13400F在日常使用中提供了坚实的性能,对于大多数应用来说是完全足够的。
PCMark 10 - Score | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F | |
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Intel Core i5-11400F |
CrossMark - Overall | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i7-12700F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
Average of class (4514 - 234662, n=1773) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Average of class (4031 - 271066, n=1734) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Average of class (3506 - 242868, n=1739) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class (6.9 - 346, n=1810) | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
* ... smaller is better
游戏基准
和以前一样,我们的审查样本主要是在游戏测试中与英特尔酷睿i5-12600K对决。在高分辨率和高预设的情况下,这两个对手的差距越来越大。如果是纯粹的游戏,你肯定不会选错英特尔酷睿i5-13400F。凭借其16个线程,目前所有的游戏在相应的显卡下都可以很好地发挥。在我们的测试中,我们使用了一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3090 Founder Edition以比较我们的测试样品和对比设备的性能。如果你也想在游戏的同时进行流媒体,我们目前推荐使用 英特尔酷睿i9-13900K或抓住一个 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X.
Gaming Performance
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
F1 22 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K |
Far Cry 5 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F |
X-Plane 11.11 | |
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
Dota 2 Reborn | |
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F |
GTA V | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 187.5 | 187.5 | 187.1 | 161.4 | 151.8 | 182.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 773 | 586 | 384 | 188.1 | 156.9 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 293.1 | 257 | 250.4 | 231.65 | 216.7 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 236 | 231 | 190.8 | 146.6 | 88.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 225 | 199.2 | 160.9 | 133.5 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 244 | 211 | 203 | 186 | 176 | 110 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 741 | 479 | 380 | 329 | 249 | 153.1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 314 | 261 | 251 | 234 | 172.2 | 99.6 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 200 | 176 | 169 | 151 | 143 | 109 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 311 | 223 | 175.2 | 140.1 | 115.8 | 76.6 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 244 | 213 | 190.8 | 164.1 | 131.6 | 75.3 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 487 | 403 | 374 | 270 | 218 | 138.8 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 648 | 548 | 441 | 224 | 175.4 | 105.3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 214 | 213 | 174 | 173 | 88 | 46 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 364 | 294 | 212 | 168.5 | 124 | 70.8 |
F1 22 (2022) | 344 | 361 | 321 | 125.1 | 83.8 | 42.4 |
The Quarry (2022) | 282 | 216 | 177.7 | 144.4 | 103.6 | 58.9 |
能源消耗
根据英特尔酷睿i5-13400F的技术规格,其功耗为65瓦,在负载下可达到148瓦。如果在BIOS中没有对该处理器的功耗进行限制,那么这148瓦是永久开启的,不受时间上的露水值限制。我们用该处理器做的所有测试都是在没有任何限制的情况下进行的。我们在Cinebench R15多测试中记录了测试系统的功耗,只有184瓦。因此,英特尔酷睿i5-13400F比英特尔酷睿i5-12600K要节俭得多,后者在我们的测试中只需要不到206瓦特。我们注意到,在压力测试中还需要214瓦特。尽管如此,能源消耗低得令人高兴。
由于功耗低,英特尔酷睿i5-13400F不需要太多的冷却。因此,你可以安全地不使用AiO,高质量的空气冷却器对该CPU来说是完全足够的。
Power Consumption / Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K (Idle: 70.5 W) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (Idle: 78.1 W) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (Idle: 78 W) | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K (Idle: 70.45 W) | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X (Idle: 79.23 W) |
Power Consumption / Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K (Idle: 70.5 W) | |
Intel Core i5-12600K (Idle: 70.45 W) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (Idle: 78 W) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (Idle: 78.1 W) | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X (Idle: 79.23 W) |
Power Consumption / The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition (Idle: 91.1 W) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K (Idle: 70.5 W) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (Idle: 78 W) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (Idle: 78.1 W) | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X (Idle: 79.23 W) | |
Intel Core i5-12600K (Idle: 70.45 W) |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption With External Monitor
Pros
Cons
结论 - 经济、快速、易于冷却
英特尔已经将Alder Lake一代的可敬的继任者送上了Raptor Lake的竞赛。在相同基础上的中端和入门级机型现在正逐步到来。尽管如此,你必须仔细观察并注意CPU的步进,因为它不一定是猛禽湖CPU。在我们的案例中,我们有英特尔酷睿i5-13400F的C0步长,这表明它的核心是阿尔德湖CPU。只有B0步长表明是原生猛禽湖CPU。这两个版本都应该是可用的,我们假设它们的性能同样良好。
同时,英特尔用英特尔酷睿i5-13400F提供了一个节俭的10核,除了P核之外还有4个E核。该模型的功率高达148瓦,在满负荷情况下相对节俭。此外,温度很容易处理,不需要复杂和昂贵的冷却。在测试中,英特尔酷睿i5-13400F可以很好地跟上英特尔酷睿i5-12600K,在能源效率方面的匹配显然有利于更节俭的模型。AMD的Zen 4处理器是无法跟上的。在这里,我们测试的原生10核反而与AMD Ryzen 7 5800X排名,后者也有16个线程。
英特尔酷睿i5-13400F为日常使用提供了坚实的性能,也掌握了最新的游戏。由于TDP较低,这款节俭的处理器也可以在小机箱中冷却,没有任何问题。
带有600系列芯片组的主板仍可用于基本单元。这在升级时不会对钱包造成太大压力。尽管如此,必须考虑到不会再有新的英特尔一代的插座1700。目前的传言说,插座1851将与Meteor Lake一起推出。这意味着,新的主板将再次成为强制性的。
价格和可用性
英特尔酷睿i5-13400F目前在Notebooksbilliger.de的售价为227欧元(约247美元)。.对于260欧元的价格,你可以买到带集成显卡的产品,也可以在Notebooksbilliger.de购买。.