英特尔酷睿i9-12900H首次亮相。联合利华科技GM7AG8P笔记本评测

Name: SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Brand: SCHENKER

一个没有Razer Blade名字的Razer Blade 17。

你真的能把GeForce RTX 3080 Ti和Core i9 CPU同时塞进一个超薄的外形尺寸而不需要扼杀性能吗？当然，一定会有一些问题。我们对GM7AG8P裸机进行了深入研究，以了解用户可以期待哪些削减的角落，如果有的话。

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/25/2022 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...

Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

英特尔终于以其第12代Alder Lake-H平台回应了AMD令人印象深刻的移动Zen 3 H系列。Schenker和Uniwill Technology为我们提供了首批搭载基于GM7AG8P机箱的12代酷睿i9-12900H的笔记本电脑之一。截至目前，Schenker还没有公开提供这种确切的配置，但零售选择可能会在以后出现。

我们的测试装置配备了上述的Core i9 CPU，新的GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GPU，DDR5-4800内存，以及1440p（QHD）IPS 165 Hz显示屏。这篇评论将集中在性能方面，以显示用户在与各自的上一代同类产品相比时，可以对新的英特尔CPU和英伟达GPU有什么期待。

更多申克评论。

Test device courtesy of Uniwill Technology

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P

Processor

Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 75 W PL2 / Short Burst, 75 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1590 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz ( including 175 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 511.65, MSHybrid

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-4800, PC5-38400, 40-39-39-76, Quad-Channel

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, Controller: BOE0977, glossy: no, 165 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm earphones, Card Reader: MicroSD

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 394 x 260.8

Battery

91 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Control Center, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.264 kg, Power Supply: 983 g

Links

SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	20 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
87.4 % v7 ^(old)		SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	27.45 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
89 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2021	Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	3.2 kg	21.4 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
89.4 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2021	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	19.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.2 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2021	MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	20 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2021	Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	19.81 mm	17.30"	2560x1440

案例--典型的 "同方"。

前身为同方科技，同方科技在其许多游戏笔记本和移动工作站中使用了类似的材料和设计。在这种情况下，GM7AG8P与XMG Neo 17和XMG Pro 17在功能、硬度和质地方面有很多共同之处，即使它们的尺寸、外观和大小略有不同。整体尺寸与Razer Blade Pro 17几乎相同，而重量却少了500克，主要是因为GM7AG8P没有蒸汽室冷却器。

尺寸比较

SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - Thunderbolt 4...有时

端口选项基本上与Schenker XMG Neo 17相同，但有几个重要的区别。例如，GM7AG8P使用较小的MicroSD读卡器，而Thunderbolt 4和外部G-Sync/Adaptive Sync兼容性只有在MSHybrid模式下运行时才会启用。

后部。USB-C带雷电4（5V/3A输出），HDMI 2.1，2.5Gbit RJ-45，AC适配器

左边：Kensington锁，USB-A 3.1 Gen. 2，3.5毫米麦克风，3.5毫米耳机

SD卡读卡器 - 仅限MicroSD

尽管有17.3英寸大的外形尺寸，该系统还是集成了一个MicroSD读卡器。此外，与其他大多数MicroSD读卡器不同，GM7AG8P上的读卡器不是弹簧式的，完全插入的卡也必须倒着插入。传输速率是平均的，因为从我们的UHS-II测试卡中移动1GB的图像需要大约15秒，而在最新的Razer Blade 17.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)	208.9 MB/s +200%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	196 MB/s +181%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)	174.7 MB/s +151%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)	74.8 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Intel Core i7-11800H	72.1 (72.11^min - 72.11^max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro V60)	69.7 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)	245.4 MB/s +210%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	199 MB/s +151%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)	190.1 MB/s +140%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Intel Core i7-11800H	91.2 MB/s +15%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)	88.3 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro V60)	79.2 MB/s

沟通

可拆卸的M.2英特尔AX201 WLAN模块。当与我们的Netgear RAX200测试路由器配对时，我们在两个方向都记录了稳定的性能。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)	1499 (1390^min - 1622^max) MBit/s +5%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1422 (1091^min - 1492^max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1239 (1143^min - 1322^max) MBit/s -13%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)	1220 (1110^min - 1275^max) MBit/s -14%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1138 (921^min - 1230^max) MBit/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	963 (300^min - 1245^max) MBit/s -32%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1491 (1415^min - 1540^max) MBit/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1468 (1377^min - 1515^max) MBit/s
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1416 (1350^min - 1459^max) MBit/s -4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)	1328 (642^min - 1384^max) MBit/s -10%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)	1242 (1169^min - 1337^max) MBit/s -15%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	852 (602^min - 1058^max) MBit/s -42%

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1468 (1377-1515)

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1422 (1091-1492)

网络摄像头

尽管有200万像素的传感器，但相机质量很差。即使按照已经很低的笔记本网络摄像头标准，图像的颗粒度也比预期的要大。

红外线是内置的，用于支持Windows Hello。

ColorChecker SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P: 12.04 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 30.98 ∆E

维护

底部面板由10颗飞利浦螺钉固定，便于维修。用户可以直接接触到两个M.2 2280存储托架、两个SODIMM插槽、主电池和WLAN模块。

配件和保修

除了交流电适配器和文件之外，盒子里没有任何额外的东西。制造商的标准保修期为1至2年，具体取决于地区。

输入设备

键盘

GM7AG8P使用了传统的基于膜的按键，更类似于XMG Core 17或XMG Pro 17，而不是XMG Neo 17的机械按键。然而，与XMG Core 17或XMG Pro 17的传统按键不同，这里的按键在物理上更大，更容易输入。键的反馈是统一的，所有的键之间都有相对安静的咔哒声，但我们确实希望行程和反馈整体上能更坚定。

触摸板

点击板的大小与Blade Pro 17上的几乎一样（13.3 x 7.6厘米对13 x 8厘米），但按下时的点击声更坚定、更响亮。滑动性能平稳，即使以较慢的速度移动光标，也几乎没有粘连。

显示 - 快速和多彩

我们的GM7AG8P测试装置使用了与去年的GM7AG8P完全相同的BOE0977显示控制器和NE173QHM-NY2 IPS面板。申克XMG Neo 17 GM7TG8S.因此，这两台笔记本电脑之间的观看体验和显示属性非常相似，包括1440p原生分辨率、快速响应时间、~1000:1对比度、165赫兹刷新率和全sRGB覆盖。最大亮度也继续保持在400尼特以下。

如下图所示，我们的特定测试设备上的背光出血可以得到改善。虽然一些出血是IPS的预期，但我们的设备表现出的出血比我们希望的要多。


374.9 cd/m²	364.5 cd/m²	355 cd/m²
366.3 cd/m²	387.1 cd/m²	359.8 cd/m²
333.4 cd/m²	369.8 cd/m²	340 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE NE173QHM-NY2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 387.1 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 361.2 cd/m² Minimum: 19.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 387.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 1210:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.67
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24

	SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S BOE0977 (NE173QHM-NY2), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E AU Optronics B173ZAN, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH AUO B173ZAN06.1 (AUODE95), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Display		-3%	24%	3%	-7%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	68.9	67.1 -3%	88.3 28%	71.7 4%	63 -9%	70.7 3%
sRGB Coverage	97.8	96.3 -2%	100 2%	98.8 1%	94.8 -3%	99.4 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.7	68.6 -3%	100 41%	73.6 4%	65 -8%	71.7 1%
Response Times		16%	14%	54%	47%	4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14.8 ?(8, 6.8)	15.2 -3%	14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) 3%	4.2 ?(1.6, 2.6) 72%	8.8 ?(2.8, 6) 41%	15.6 ?(8.4, 7.2) -5%
Response Time Black / White *	13.6 ?(7.6, 6)	8.8 35%	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) 24%	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4) 35%	6.4 ?(2, 4.4) 53%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) 12%
PWM Frequency
Screen		18%	11%	-9%	22%	9%
Brightness middle	387.1	396 2%	438.7 13%	323.3 -16%	474 22%	389.7 1%
Brightness	361	366 1%	435 20%	315 -13%	454 26%	363 1%
Brightness Distribution	86	82 -5%	91 6%	91 6%	88 2%	84 -2%
Black Level *	0.32	0.45 -41%	0.48 -50%	0.33 -3%	0.46 -44%	0.47 -47%
Contrast	1210	880 -27%	914 -24%	980 -19%	1030 -15%	829 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.32	1.43 67%	4.34 -0%	4.59 -6%	1.5 65%	1.93 55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.58	2.2 74%	7.3 15%	10.82 -26%	5.59 35%	6.84 20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.67	1.34 20%	0.72 57%	1.4 16%	0.86 49%	1.31 22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.6	1.8 73%	2.4 64%	7.9 -20%	2.8 58%	2.4 64%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.4 ^92%	2.09 ^105%	2.28 ^96%	2.158 ^102%	2.12 ^104%
CCT	6114 ^106%	6489 ^100%	6413 ^101%	5941 ^109%	6597 ^99%	6658 ^98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		10% / 13%	16% / 14%	16% / 3%	21% / 19%	5% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

灰度在开箱后没有得到很好的校准，由于6100K左右的暖色温，其平均deltaE值相对较高，为6.6。一旦用X-Rite色度计进行校准，灰度和ColorChecker都会得到改善，最终的平均deltaE值分别只有1.1和1.67。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.6 ms rise
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8 ms rise
14.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能--对于尺寸来说是极端的

高级优化（或优化2.0）不可用，这意味着用户将不得不通过BIOS在独立GPU和MSHybrid之间手动切换。此外，请记住，GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GPU默认设置为150 W TGP，尽管Nvidia控制面板指出它能够达到175 W。用户必须通过附带的控制中心软件将GPU手动设置为175 W。

测试条件

在运行以下任何性能基准测试之前，我们将我们的设备设置为默认的BIOS和控制中心设置，尽管涡轮增压电源配置文件处于激活状态。我们强烈建议用户熟悉控制中心，因为重要的功能在这里被切换。

处理器--明显的跨代改进

原始的CPU性能只比普通的CPU慢大约9%。酷睿i9-12900HK上发现的微星GE76.当与上一代的酷睿i9-11900H的情况下，该酷睿i9-12900H直接取代，用户可以期待单线程和多线程性能分别提高约20%和30%。这一提升足以推动新的英特尔CPU高于 Ryzen 7 5800H和 Ryzen 9 5900HX它们是一些最快的移动Zen 3 CPU。

关于桤木湖平台的其他细节可以在我们的概述中找到这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2545 (2524.61-2567.06)

SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1746 (1721.47-1773.68)

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2073 (2064.09-2085.83)

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K: Ø2057 (2014.3-2361.09)

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K: Ø2359 (2290.43-2532.77)

Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS: Ø1835 (1810.86-1981.87)

MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	86.6 pt
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	81.2 pt
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	77 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	72.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	68.8 pt
MSI WE76 11UM-456 ^-1! Intel Core i9-11980HK	64.3 pt
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	62.8 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	62.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	61.8 pt
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	60.2 pt
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 ^-2! Intel Core i7-11800H	57 pt
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	55.3 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	47.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	47 pt
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	41.5 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)	21994 Points +33%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	18288 Points +10%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	16587 (14797.9^min - 16587.2^max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7359 - 19648, n=28)	15133 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	14066 Points -15%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	13387 Points -19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	13012 Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	12693 Points -23%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	12476 Points -25%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	12373 Points -25%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	11981 (11268.1^min - 11981.1^max) Points -28%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	11641 Points -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	8504 Points -49%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	8408 Points -49%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5216 Points -69%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	1920 Points
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	1909 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)	1894 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1634 - 1930, n=28)	1829 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	1619 Points -16%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	1613 Points -16%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	1575 Points -18%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	1504 Points -22%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	1503 Points -22%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1491 Points -22%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1479 Points -23%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1429 Points -26%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	1305 Points -32%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	1225 Points -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	1208 Points -37%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)	8352 Points +31%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	6849 Points +7%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	6395 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2681 - 7471, n=28)	5717 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	5055 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4925 Points -23%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	4878 Points -24%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	4850 Points -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	4776 Points -25%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	4456 Points -30%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	4437 Points -31%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	4304 Points -33%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	3244 Points -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	3235 Points -49%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	1994 Points -69%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	736 Points
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	734 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)	727 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (624 - 738, n=28)	706 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	634 Points -14%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	622 Points -15%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	610 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	581 Points -21%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	581 Points -21%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	580 Points -21%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	573 Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	560 Points -24%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	506 Points -31%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	476 Points -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	471 Points -36%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)	3440 Points +34%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	2909 (2660.99^min - 2908.88^max) Points +13%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	2567 (2524.61^min - 2567.06^max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1395 - 3077, n=28)	2454 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	2361 Points -8%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	2192 (1955.32^min - 2192.14^max) Points -15%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	2148 (1832.59^min - 2147.65^max) Points -16%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2087 (2046.66^min - 2087.25^max) Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	2086 (2064.09^min - 2085.83^max) Points -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2041 (1981.96^min - 2041.34^max) Points -20%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	1872 (1711.82^min - 1871.52^max) Points -27%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	1853 (1809.95^min - 1853.31^max) Points -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	1508 (1385.57^min - 1507.73^max) Points -41%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	1382 Points -46%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	832 (785.79^min - 831.69^max) Points -68%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)	278 Points +1%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	275 Points 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	275 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (235 - 277, n=29)	262 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	254 Points -8%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	244 Points -11%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	241 Points -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	239 Points -13%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	238 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	233 Points -15%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	226 Points -18%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	222 Points -19%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	209 Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	196 Points -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	192 Points -30%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	581 Seconds * -206%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	326 Seconds * -72%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	326 Seconds * -72%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	270 Seconds * -42%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	250 Seconds * -32%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	249 Seconds * -31%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	247 Seconds * -30%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	246 Seconds * -29%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	242 Seconds * -27%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 451, n=28)	231 Seconds * -22%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	227 Seconds * -19%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	190 Seconds *
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	181 Seconds * +5%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)	169.4 Seconds * +11%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)	85738 MIPS +27%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	72836 MIPS +8%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	67423 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34684 - 76677, n=28)	60849 MIPS -10%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	59986 MIPS -11%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	59182 MIPS -12%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	57579 MIPS -15%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	55231 MIPS -18%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	53817 MIPS -20%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	53426 MIPS -21%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	53205 MIPS -21%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	49275 MIPS -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	42138 MIPS -38%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	40876 MIPS -39%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	23768 MIPS -65%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)	6322 MIPS +7%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	6174 MIPS +5%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	6144 MIPS +4%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	5885 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=28)	5843 MIPS -1%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	5726 MIPS -3%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5681 MIPS -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5664 MIPS -4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	5640 MIPS -4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5535 MIPS -6%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	5463 MIPS -7%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	5404 MIPS -8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	5393 MIPS -8%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5380 MIPS -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	5068 MIPS -14%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)	15098 Points +19%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	13648 Points +7%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	12710 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=31)	11913 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	10482 Points -18%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	10081 Points -21%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	9856 Points -22%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	9294 Points -27%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	9062 Points -29%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	8135 Points -36%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	7599 Points -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	7353 Points -42%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	6688 Points -47%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5056 Points -60%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	1918 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)	1898 Points +4%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	1820 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1631 - 1897, n=31)	1800 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	1777 Points -2%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	1679 Points -8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	1632 Points -10%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	1569 Points -14%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1538 Points -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1529 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1505 Points -17%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	1351 Points -26%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	1264 Points -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	1237 Points -32%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)	23.6 fps +22%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	19.9 fps +3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	19.4 fps
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	17.1 fps -12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8.05 - 22.5, n=28)	17.1 fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	16 fps -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	15.8 fps -19%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	15.8 fps -19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	15 fps -23%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	14.8 fps -24%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	14.3 fps -26%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	13.6 fps -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	11.1 fps -43%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	11.1 fps -43%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	6.38 fps -67%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	56.5 s * -27%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	56.1 s * -26%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	51.7 s * -16%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	51.5 s * -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	49.8 s * -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	49.3 s * -11%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	49.3 s * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	48.7 s * -10%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)	48.1 s * -8%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	47.7 s * -7%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	46.4 s * -5%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	44.4 s *
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36.8 - 59.8, n=28)	42.4 s * +5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	40.5 s * +9%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	38.9 s * +12%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H	0.621 sec * -45%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	0.577 sec * -35%
Alienware m17 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.574 sec * -34%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	0.572 sec * -34%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.566 sec * -33%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	0.545 sec * -28%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	0.533 sec * -25%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.511 sec * -20%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.502 sec * -18%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	0.4981 sec * -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.4926 sec * -15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.506, n=28)	0.454 sec * -6%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)	0.4366 sec * -2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4269 sec *
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4252 sec * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2567 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

247 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

275 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6395 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

736 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16587 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1920 Points

Help

... in comparison

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	8540 KRay/s

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	39721 Points

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2983 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101357 Points

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9985 Points

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	23539 Points

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	61517 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1053 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s -100%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s -100%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s -100%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s -100%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	5016 KRay/s

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40529 MPixel/s

系统性能

PCMark分数是我们数据库中最高的一些分数，基本上可以与配备台式机Core i9-11900K的Schenker XMG Ultra 17相媲美。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	7884 Points 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	7883 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (7139 - 8083, n=6)	7705 Points -2%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	7511 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB	7461 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7212 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	6972 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	11266 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	11050 Points +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	10854 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (10254 - 11178, n=6)	10808 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB	10608 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	10450 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	10226 Points -6%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9102 - 11186, n=6)	10038 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	9827 Points 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9789 Points
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9564 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	9136 Points -7%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	9077 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB	8985 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	12511 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	12250 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB	11829 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9847 - 12627, n=6)	11487 Points -8%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	11245 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	10184 Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	9847 Points -21%

PCMark 10 Score		7883 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62554 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	61251 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	47304 MB/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	44180 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65452 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65301 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	47698 MB/s -27%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	46438 MB/s -29%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65518 MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64282 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	47022 MB/s -28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	46176 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.6 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	92.3 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	80.3 ns *
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 ns *
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	0 ns *
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	0 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示在我们的主页上打开多个标签时有轻微的DPC问题。在60 FPS下的4K视频播放很流畅，但并不完美，因为我们在长达一分钟的视频测试中能够记录到14个丢帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6767 μs * -948%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	4407 μs * -582%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	762 μs * -18%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	646 μs *
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	526 μs * +19%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	395.1 μs * +39%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备 - 2x M.2 PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘

512GB的三星PM9A1硬盘提供的连续读取和写入速度分别高达6900MB/s和5000MB/s。在循环运行DiskSpd时，我们能够达到接近最高速度，但性能最终会从悬崖上跌落，在测试结束时 "只有 "3200MB/s，如下图所示。结果表明，由于温度的限制，该硬盘可能无法长时间保持最高性能。

最多支持两个PCIe4 x4 SSD。我们的测试装置在发货时，两个驱动器不在RAID配置中，但如果需要，用户可以配置为RAID 0或1。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6790 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5012 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 705 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 485.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 4425 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 4045 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 90.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 226.7 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	91.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	90 pt
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	84.8 pt
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	83.8 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	80.9 pt
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	52.6 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4426 (4422.86^min - 4426.46^max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4251 (4236.46^min - 4250.93^max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4209 (4177.98^min - 4209.4^max) MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3980 (3953.55^min - 3979.77^max) MB/s -5%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3167 (2857.53^min - 3167.08^max) MB/s -25%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	2161 (2137.42^min - 2160.91^max) MB/s -49%
seq write
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4288 (4263.58^min - 4288.05^max) MB/s +9%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4283 (4269.53^min - 4283.43^max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3945 (3883.08^min - 3944.74^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3840 (3826.15^min - 3839.76^max) MB/s -3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3834 (3789.52^min - 3833.59^max) MB/s -3%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	2978 (2936.01^min - 2977.75^max) MB/s -25%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	6684 (5510.27^min - 6684.46^max) MB/s +62%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6678 (5921.52^min - 6678.38^max) MB/s +62%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6670 (6036.74^min - 6669.78^max) MB/s +61%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6653 (6275.76^min - 6652.91^max) MB/s +61%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6371 (5985.48^min - 6371.15^max) MB/s +54%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4134 (3437.91^min - 4133.91^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5013 (4970.67^min - 5012.61^max) MB/s +3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4999 (4987.66^min - 4998.77^max) MB/s +3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4949 (4924.12^min - 4949.28^max) MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4921 (4905.7^min - 4920.56^max) MB/s +1%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	4917 (4616.04^min - 4917.19^max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4855 (4802.31^min - 4855.33^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 read
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	91.7 (91.52^min - 91.69^max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	90.5 (90.32^min - 90.48^max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	87.6 (87.01^min - 87.6^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	59 (58.85^min - 58.97^max) MB/s -33%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	56.2 (55.28^min - 56.2^max) MB/s -36%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	51.2 (51.08^min - 51.21^max) MB/s -42%
4k q1 t1 write
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	232 (230.16^min - 231.56^max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	227 (226.1^min - 227.27^max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	227 (226.47^min - 227.34^max) MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	174 (171.94^min - 173.87^max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	170 (169.81^min - 170.42^max) MB/s -25%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	166 (164.47^min - 165.73^max) MB/s -27%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4180 (4177.07^min - 4179.97^max) MB/s +22%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4080 (4052.11^min - 4079.84^max) MB/s +19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4071 (4064.6^min - 4070.6^max) MB/s +19%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3423 (3416.77^min - 3422.76^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3408 (3395.09^min - 3407.81^max) MB/s 0%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	724 (719.56^min - 724.12^max) MB/s -79%
4k q32 t16 write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3545 (3290.66^min - 3545.47^max) MB/s +22%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3531 (3517.4^min - 3531.03^max) MB/s +22%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3295 (3221.5^min - 3294.97^max) MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2975 (2942.71^min - 2974.69^max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2903 (2888.07^min - 2902.85^max) MB/s
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	376 (372.82^min - 375.8^max) MB/s -87%

AS SSD
Score Total
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8874 Points +6%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8847 Points +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8830 Points +5%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	8404 Points
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7794 Points -7%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	4314 Points -49%
Score Read
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3301 Points +9%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3300 Points +9%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3285 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3044 Points +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3019 Points
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	1801 Points -40%
Score Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3963 Points +1%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3953 Points +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3926 Points 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3917 Points
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3252 Points -17%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	1737 Points -56%
Seq Read
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	5459 MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5408 MB/s -1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5367 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5302 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5223 MB/s -4%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	4978 MB/s -9%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3977 MB/s +4%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3965 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3922 MB/s +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3863 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3842 MB/s
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	2058 MB/s -46%
4K Read
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	82.2 MB/s +4%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	79.9 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	78.8 MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	55 MB/s -30%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	52.7 MB/s -33%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	43.4 MB/s -45%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	207.6 MB/s +10%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	194.2 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	188.5 MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	153.1 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	148.7 MB/s -21%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	146.9 MB/s -22%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2715 MB/s +13%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2692 MB/s +12%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2684 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2439 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2394 MB/s
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	1260 MB/s -47%
4K-64 Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3416 MB/s +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3414 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3345 MB/s
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3335 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2652 MB/s -21%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	1385 MB/s -59%
Access Time Read
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.046 ms * -12%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.044 ms * -7%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.041 ms *
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	0.039 ms * +5%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.027 ms * +34%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.022 ms * +46%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.085 ms * -33%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	0.074 ms * -16%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.066 ms * -3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.064 ms *
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.027 ms * +58%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.021 ms * +67%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P: Ø5606 (2290.12-6783.3)

GPU性能--比移动版GeForce RTX 3080好一点

与台式机GeForce RTX 3080 Ti比台式机GeForce RTX 3080快约10%一样，笔记本GeForce RTX 3080 Ti也只比笔记本GeForce RTX 3080快约10%。预计性能与台式机GeForce RTX 3070最为相似，这与原生QHD 165 Hz显示屏完美契合。

在MSHybrid模式而不是dGPU模式下运行将导致Time Spy GPU得分降低1.2%（12176分对12020分），以表明切换到MSHybrid时的性能下降几乎可以忽略不计。

当通过控制中心将GPU设置为175W时，我们的Time Spy 图形得分将增加到12714分，性能提升只有4%到5%。

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X	45785 Points +46%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	40910 Points +31%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	31341 Points
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	31096 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6928 - 34439, n=43)	29496 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	28036 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X	27228 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	27138 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10900K	25504 Points -19%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK	22391 Points -29%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	14599 Points -53%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X	19081 Points +57%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	17467 Points +43%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	13579 Points +12%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	12176 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (4921 - 13835, n=43)	11850 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X	11099 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10900K	10938 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	10797 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	10098 Points -17%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK	8479 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	5591 Points -54%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X	12074 Points +56%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	10793 Points +39%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	8483 Points +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6613 - 8613, n=17)	7891 Points +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	7741 Points
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X	6379 Points -18%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK	5166 Points -33%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X	12798 Points +66%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	11238 Points +46%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	8191 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6423 - 8462, n=28)	7800 Points +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	7721 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10900K	6633 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	6540 Points -15%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK	5092 Points -34%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	569 Points -93%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X	61244 Points +54%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	47287 Points +19%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	40646 Points +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	39791 Points
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X	39651 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (13920 - 45841, n=45)	39402 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	37779 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	37405 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10900K	36838 Points -7%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK	29220 Points -27%

3DMark 11 Performance		33697 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		65615 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		26968 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		12364 points
Help

... in comparison

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø112.2 (106-119)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	186	183	179	125	111
The Witcher 3 (2015)	472.4	368.4	236.3	117.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	186	172	166	159
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	167	155	117
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	160	142	107
Far Cry 5 (2018)	186	160	150	138	120
Strange Brigade (2018)	472	290	231	203	151
Hunt Showdown (2020)	243.2	197.9	167.6		103.6
Doom Eternal (2020)	491.8	321.3	292.4	279	210.6
Gears Tactics (2020)	366.3	270	195.5	136.5	97.1
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)	162	141	130	118	98
Watch Dogs Legion (2020)	137	128	116	84	64
Dirt 5 (2020)	217.5	167.8	136.8	105.4	85.6
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020)	166	118	99	85	68
Hitman 3 (2021)	297.5	228.9	211.9	201.8	133.9
F1 2021 (2021)	364	328	271	103	71
Far Cry 6 (2021)	158	131	117	107	88
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021)	157	157	157	152	122
Riders Republic (2021)	207	159	133	122	90
Halo Infinite (2021)	260.3	165.7	146.7	137.3	96.3
God of War (2022)	158.5	135.2	110.1	79	64.4

排放

系统噪音 - 不出所料的响亮

像大多数其他游戏笔记本一样，不需要很多屏幕上的活动就能让内部风扇旋转起来。像网页浏览或视频流等要求不高的动作会使风扇噪音达到30.8 dB(A)，而静音背景为23.1 dB(A)。噪音的增加是明显的，但是在GM7AG8P上，风扇转速的调整通常是渐进的，而不是急剧的，因此更容易忍受。

运行更高的负载，如游戏，会导致噪音水平与我们在XMG Neo 17 GM7TG8S上观察到的非常相似。预计在这种情况下，风扇噪音会在50dB(A)的低到中的范围内，这是发烧级游戏笔记本的常见范围。风扇的声音很大，我们建议在玩《堡垒之夜》等游戏时戴上耳机，因为安静的音频提示对游戏至关重要。

风扇噪音曲线（白色。背景，红色。系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：Witcher 3 ，绿色。Prime95+FurMark压力)

在CPU上使用Liquif金属散热膏。我们的设备会表现出轻微的电子噪音，因此它从来没有真正的安静。

Noise Level

Idle		28.1 / 28.1 / 30.8 dB(A)
Load		39.1 / 52.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A)

	SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise		7%	6%	4%	-2%	6%
off / environment *	23.1	23 -0%	24.9 -8%	24.2 -5%	24 -4%	23.8 -3%
Idle Minimum *	28.1	23 18%	24.9 11%	24.7 12%	24 15%	23.9 15%
Idle Average *	28.1	23 18%	24.9 11%	24.7 12%	25 11%	23.9 15%
Idle Maximum *	30.8	23 25%	29.6 4%	24.7 20%	42 -36%	23.9 22%
Load Average *	39.1	39.5 -1%	31.1 20%	44.3 -13%	46 -18%	38 3%
Witcher 3 ultra *	52.4	54.5 -4%	49.7 5%	56.3 -7%	48 8%	55.9 -7%
Load Maximum *	52.5	55.09 -5%	54.8 -4%	47.7 9%	48 9%	55.9 -6%

* ... smaller is better

温度 - 热中心，冷角落

机箱中心区域的表面温度总是很高。例如，当在桌面上闲置，没有其他运行的应用程序时，键盘中心和底板后部的温度可以达到40℃。

平均表面温度通常比竞争者Razer Blade Pro 17的温度低，后者使用镁合金底盘而不是ABS塑料。因此，我们的GM7AG8P的掌托在游戏时能比Razer的掌托保持更凉爽和舒适，超过几摄氏度。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


46.8 °C	50.2 °C	38.2 °C
37.6 °C	56.8 °C	28.6 °C
29.6 °C	30.2 °C	28.8 °C

Maximum: 56.8 °C
Average: 38.5 °C


40 °C	59.2 °C	43.2 °C
30.8 °C	60.2 °C	37 °C
28.4 °C	33.8 °C	30.8 °C

Maximum: 60.2 °C
Average: 40.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


33.4 °C	36.2 °C	33 °C
31.2 °C	40.2 °C	28.4 °C
26 °C	26 °C	25.6 °C

Maximum: 40.2 °C
Average: 31.1 °C


34.8 °C	43 °C	36.2 °C
29.2 °C	39.4 °C	32.2 °C
27 °C	29 °C	28.6 °C

Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 33.3 °C

Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


42 °C	45 °C	37 °C
32 °C	53.4 °C	26 °C
28.4 °C	28.2 °C	25.6 °C

Maximum: 53.4 °C
Average: 35.3 °C


37.2 °C	55.4 °C	41.6 °C
28.6 °C	53 °C	34.2 °C
26.8 °C	30.2 °C	30.4 °C

Maximum: 55.4 °C
Average: 37.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 44 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56.8 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.2 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).

	SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Heat		8%	13%	19%	20%	7%
Maximum Upper Side *	56.8	51 10%	58.4 -3%	41 28%	49 14%	54.2 5%
Maximum Bottom *	60.2	62 -3%	49 19%	47.2 22%	57 5%	52.2 13%
Idle Upper Side *	40.2	35 13%	33.6 16%	33.2 17%	28 30%	37.4 7%
Idle Bottom *	43	38 12%	34.6 20%	39 9%	30 30%	41.4 4%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

运行Prime95给CPU施加压力将导致时钟频率提升到3.2至3.6GHz的范围，并且核心温度稳定在80C。CPU封装的功率也将无限期地稳定在75W，这是默认的TDP设置。如果需要，用户可以通过控制中心将PL1和PL2的限制提高到120W。

运行时 Witcher 3根据GPU-Z的数据，在dGPU设置为默认的150W时，将导致GPU的稳定温度为76C，板子的耗电量约为150W。如果通过控制中心设置为175 W，内存时钟将从1750 MHz增加到1800 MHz，而GPU温度也将从76 C增加到86 C，主板功耗将稳定在170 W左右，或略微低于175 W的最大值。有趣的是，在150W或175W的TGP模式下，GPU时钟速率将保持在1500-1600MHz的范围内。

用电池供电运行将比预期的更大程度地限制性能。在dGPU和电池上进行的Time Spy 测试将返回物理和图形分数，分别为7150和897分，而在主电源上则为13552和12176分，即使禁用Nvidia Whisper Mode 2.0和Battery Boost。

	CPU时钟（GHz）	GPU时钟（MHz）	CPU平均温度（°C）	GPU平均温度（°C）
系统空闲	--	--	40	38
Prime95压力	3.2 - 3.6	--	80	58
Prime95 + FurMark压力	2.5	~1102	90	85
Witcher 3 应力（150 W TGP模式）	~1.0	~1537	73	76

发言人

在最大音量下有粉红噪音。扬声器的音量不错，但与微星GP66上的扬声器相比，几乎没有那么大的音量或那么宽的范围。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

功率消耗--要求高的部件

我们上面的基准测试显示，与Core i9-11900H和GeForce RTX 3080相比，CPU性能提高了20%至30%，GPU性能提高了10%，这在Schenker XMG Neo 17 GM7TG8S.尽管如此，Metrahit的测量结果显示，在类似的条件下，我们的GM7AG8P比旧的GM7TG8S略微更耗电。尤其是运行Prime95时，GM7AG8P的耗电量增加了约10%至15%，这意味着上述CPU性能的提升并不是完全免费的。因此，与Tiger Lake-H相比，Alder Lake-H的每瓦性能并没有高出很多。

在同时运行Prime95和FurMark压力时，我们能够从大型（约18 x 8.5 x 3.5厘米）280瓦的AC适配器上记录到292瓦的临时最大耗电。如果手动将GPU设置为175 W模式，预计这一最大值甚至会高出20 W或更多。这一速度将持续约20秒，然后下降并稳定在250W左右，如我们下面的截图所示，可能是由于散热限制。

Prime95压力在10秒后启动。消耗量将保持稳定，没有下降，表明涡轮增压的可持续性良好。

Prime95+FurMark在10s标记处启动。消耗量将飙升至近300W，然后下降到250W左右。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.09 / 11.2 Watt
Idle	29.7 / 33.6 / 35.5 Watt
Load	113.8 / 292 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Power Consumption		18%	9%	11%	29%	28%
Idle Minimum *	29.7	19 36%	10.2 66%	20.9 30%	14 53%	11 63%
Idle Average *	33.6	25 26%	21.2 37%	25.1 25%	19 43%	15.6 54%
Idle Maximum *	35.5	28 21%	48.4 -36%	45 -27%	31 13%	34 4%
Load Average *	113.8	105 8%	118.7 -4%	102 10%	97 15%	81.2 29%
Witcher 3 ultra *	210	223 -6%	249 -19%	189 10%	156 26%	204 3%
Load Maximum *	292	226 23%	262 10%	234.8 20%	231 21%	257.3 12%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø210 (205-258)

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø254 (144-292)

Power Consumption external Monitor

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø142.4 (138-147)

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø130.4 (88.7-136)

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø194.9 (188-202)

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø206 (202-210)

电池寿命

集成电池的功率相对较大，为91瓦，而采用11代英特尔的XMG Neo 17只有62瓦。尽管如此，电池寿命仍然很平庸，即使设置为平衡或办公电源配置文件，实际使用WLAN的时间也只有3小时。

用附带的交流适配器从空到满的充电时间比预期的3小时要慢得多。换句话说，在浏览网页时，系统的充电时间和耗电时间一样长。大多数超极本和其他游戏笔记本电脑可以在2小时或更短时间内完全充电。

可悲的是，该系统不能通过第三方USB-C适配器充电，这与雷蛇Blade Pro和华硕或Alienware的大多数其他游戏笔记本不同。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		0h 00min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 32min

	SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 91 Wh	SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh	Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 87 Wh	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh	MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 91 Wh
Battery Runtime		-19%	-30%	-11%	-8%	8%
Reader / Idle			419	404	592
WiFi v1.3	384	224 -42%	353 -8%	314 -18%	382 -1%	416 8%
Load	92	96 4%	45 -51%	88 -4%	79 -14%
H.264		222

Pros

+ 轻薄的GeForce RTX 3080 Ti游戏笔记本

+ 广泛的控制中心性能选项

+ 快速的显示响应时间，没有PWM

+ 支持PCIe4 x4 RAID 0/1

+ 易维修性

Cons

- 不能长时间保持最大的SSD传输率

- 不能通过第三方USB-C适配器为笔记本电脑充电

- 显示屏可以在开箱时进行更好的校准

- 网络摄像头质量差，没有每个键的RGB灯光

- 大而重的280瓦交流适配器

- 明显的均匀背光渗漏

结论--每体积的性能非常高

在审查中。联合利华科技GM7AG8P。测试装置由申克公司和Uniwill Technology提供。

移动GeForce RTX 3070 Ti和 RTX 3080 Ti是为了在移动GeForce RTX 3000系列不可避免地推出之前延长其寿命而推出的，GeForce 4000系列。然而，在那之前，移动RTX 3080 Ti可以提供发烧友所渴望的额外性能提升。尽管该GPU只比移动RTX 3080 Ti快一点，但看到像GM7AG8P这样的超薄型号超过像微星GE76 10UH这样的更厚更重的替代产品的旧版RTX 3080，仍然令人印象深刻。

也许GM7AG8P更值得注意的方面是它能够维持150+W的TGP目标，尽管它的外形纤细，重量相对较低。这款 Razer Blade Pro和MSI GS76 Stealth根据我们对其他超薄游戏笔记本的经验，Uniwill Technology已经成功地安装了一个比我们最初预期更强大的GPU。

无论尺寸和重量如何，CPU和GPU在任何游戏笔记本电脑中都是最快的，但笨重的280瓦交流适配器使笔记本电脑原本轻薄便携的设计大打折扣。

至于酷睿i9-12900HCPU，其性能提升超过了酷睿i9-11900H比从移动RTX 3080到移动RTX 3080 Ti的跳跃更显著。代与代之间的改进足够大，足以舒适地取代AMD Zen 3 H系列，成为游戏笔记本电脑的顶级CPU。

GM7AG8P最大的缺点之一是它的大型280瓦砖，需要为里面的苛刻处理器供电。几乎整整一公斤，适配器和相关电缆与一些15.6英寸超极本一样重。令人遗憾的是，该系统不能通过USB-C充电，这迫使业主在旅行时携带庞大的适配器。相比之下，华硕ROG Zephyrus和Alienware笔记本电脑可以通过适合旅行的第三方USB-C适配器进行充电。游戏时预期会有很大的风扇噪音，这是这个特定类别中所有游戏笔记本的共同特征。