Notebookcheck Logo

带有RTX 3080的Schenker XMG Pro 17(Clevo PC70HS)评测。一台节流的超轻薄游戏笔记本和工作站合二为一

与其说是游戏笔记本电脑,不如说是工作站。

与其15英寸的兄弟姐妹模型一样,新的XMG Pro 17也采用了超薄的外壳,同时仍然带来了RTX 3080。为了避免冷却系统的潜在问题,Schenker对此进行了节流。我们在这个测试中发现,这个概念是否成功,以及为什么这个超薄的高性能笔记本电脑更像是一个工作站而不是一个游戏设备。
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake

我们上次测试17英寸版本的XMG Pro是在2020年初,从那时起已经发生了很多事情。正如我们在 15英寸版本我们现在要问的是,这种超轻薄的设计是否能同时为游戏玩家和专业人士提供足够的动力。

前代产品配备了RTX 2060和 英特尔酷睿i7-9750H几乎不再适合进行比较。因此,对于基准测试,我们使用其他竞争对手,如 Alienware x17 R1,以及Medion Erazer Beast X25以及明显更昂贵的 华硕ROG Zephyrus S17MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH以及15英寸的 XMG Pro 15的同胞模型进行比较。

XMG Pro 17 (XMG Pro 17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 135 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, 105 W TDP, No whisperMode, no advanced Optimus, Geforce 497.09, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB Samsung DDR4 SDRAM (DDR4-3200, M471A2K43DB1-CWE)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AUO B173ZAN3.0 (AUO309B), IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, 1024 GB 
, 860 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: headset port, microphone port, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 395.9 x 264.95
Battery
73 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HD Webcam
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty, battery: only 12 months
Weight
2.431 kg, Power Supply: 591 g
Price
3323.99 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors for Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
84.7 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2022
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg19.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
84.6 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2022
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2 kg19.8 mm15.60"3840x2160
89 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3.2 kg21.4 mm17.30"3840x2160
85 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Medion Erazer Beast X25
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.2 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg20 mm17.30"3840x2160
90.1 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"2560x1440

外壳 - 超薄的金属外壳和塑料键盘

最大开启角度:130度
最大开启角度:130度

纤细的黑色外壳现在几乎完全由金属制成,除了显示屏边框和镶嵌在底座上的键盘。对于一台游戏笔记本电脑来说,其设计保持了非常适度,更多地反映了其作为专业工作站的平行野心。

底座并不完全耐翘,但仍然相当坚固,尽管当我们试图弯曲它时,它仍然产生各种吱吱嘎嘎的声音,特别是在右侧。

虽然显示器盖子也可以稍微弯曲,但由于金属框架的存在,它显得很舒适坚固。铰链可以更紧,特别是在小的开放角度。

Schenker提供各种17英寸笔记本电脑,但新的XMG Pro 17在超薄设计方面可以轻松击败Key、Apex、Core、Ultra、Focus、Neo和前代产品。它整整瘦了一厘米(约0.4英寸),成为整体上最薄的17英寸申博太阳城手机版!

微星和华硕ROG也同样纤薄,但价格要高得多。Alienware和Medion在这里不能完全跟上,即使至少Alienware是什么都不厚。

Size Comparison

399.23 mm 299.49 mm 21.4 mm 3.2 kg395 mm 262 mm 23 mm 2.3 kg396 mm 259 mm 20 mm 2.4 kg395.9 mm 264.95 mm 19.9 mm 2.4 kg394 mm 264 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg357.5 mm 238 mm 19.8 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - 3台外部显示器

通过Thunderbolt 4(没有充电功能的USB-C)、MiniDisplayport和HDMI,你可以将三个外部显示器连接到Pro 17。所有的显示端口都兼容G-Sync。用于麦克风和耳机的独立端口也是积极的。

另一方面,专业用户可能会错过SD读卡器,而且连接的位置也让人有一些抱怨的小理由。尽管接口分布在背面、左侧和右侧,但不幸的是,它们被放在一起非常近。在这方面,所有的制造商都应该看一看价格低廉的 MSI GP66 Leopard作为一个很好的例子。

左边:Kensington,USB-A 3.0,耳机,麦克风
左边:Kensington,USB-A 3.0,耳机,麦克风
右边:2个USB-A 3.0,LAN
右边:2个USB-A 3.0,LAN
背面。MiniDP,HDMI 2.1,电源,USB-C 3.2 Gen2x1与Thunderbolt 4。
背面。MiniDP,HDMI 2.1,电源,USB-C 3.2 Gen2x1与Thunderbolt 4。
正面。控制LED
正面。控制LED

沟通

WiFi模块
WiFi模块

虽然这里使用的英特尔AX201 WiFi模块实现了千兆速度,但它的表现仍然略低于其全部能力,特别是在接收数据时。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1499 (1390min - 1622max) MBit/s +39%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1498 (748min - 1544max) MBit/s +39%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1460 (1142min - 1595max) MBit/s +36%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1220 (1110min - 1275max) MBit/s +13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1075 (526min - 1130max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
636 (325min - 728max) MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AX12
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1390 (669min - 1618max) MBit/s +37%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1328 (642min - 1384max) MBit/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1290 (800min - 1659max) MBit/s +28%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s +25%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1242 (1169min - 1337max) MBit/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1011 (390min - 1048max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
698 (529min - 748max) MBit/s -31%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080); iperf3 receive AX12: Ø944 (390-1048)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080); iperf3 transmit AX12: Ø993 (526-1130)

网络摄像头

尽管目标群体是富有创造力的专业人士,但有一个标准的720p网络摄像头,它的色彩偏差甚至比竞争对手还要大,这已经不是很好了。

ColorChecker
22.1 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
17 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
2 ∆E
9 ∆E
17 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080): 20.91 ∆E min: 2.01 - max: 31.58 ∆E

安全问题

有一个Kensington锁插槽,也有TPM 2.0。此外,Pro 17提供了一个指纹传感器,它被集成到触摸板的左上角。

该传感器与Windows Hello结合使用,可以非常迅速地解锁笔记本电脑。

辅料

除了通常的文件之外,作为Schenker的典型代表,盒子里还包括一个带有驱动程序的U盘,或者还有一张驱动光盘,以及一块黑色的清洁布。 其他制造商只包括较少的附件,或者根本就没有附件。

维护

箱子的底部用12颗飞利浦螺钉固定。卸下这些螺丝后,虽然底板是由坚固的金属制成,但要撬开它并不难。一旦你能进入内部,你就可以更换两个内存模块、WLAN模块和SSD,还可以清洁两个风扇。还有空间可以放置第二块固态硬盘,电池也可以拿到。

看一看里面的情况
看一看里面的情况
2个三星RAM模块
2个三星RAM模块

担保

XMG提供两年的制造商保修。在订购笔记本电脑时,你也可以将其扩大到三年,但需要支付额外费用。与许多其他制造商相比,保修服务还包括免费检查。在你免费送来笔记本后,会对其进行清洁,更新散热膏,并将固件更新到最新版本。如果你愿意,还可以重新安装Windows,并提供所有当前的更新。

保修条件
保修条件

输入设备 - 键盘上的小按键弯曲太大

键盘

键盘
键盘

键看起来相当小,特别是对于17英寸的笔记本电脑来说。但布局看起来非常干净,而且有一个数字块。不幸的是,普通键盘和数字块之间没有缝隙,因此普通尺寸的方向键没有被单独放置,而是被放置在两块键盘之间。

乍一看并不明显,但镶嵌在金属底座上的键盘只是由薄塑料制成。这意味着按键下面的薄板会经常向下弯曲,在打字的时候会有明显的波动。这对我们来说有点过分,变得很烦人。

笔画高度一般,但反馈清晰,打字也相当舒适。只有小尺寸的按键稍微令人讨厌。打字的噪音非常适中。

键盘为每个键提供了单独的RGB照明,允许你用不同的颜色来照亮WASD键,例如,使它们从其他键中更加突出。这方面的设置包含在控制中心中。

箭头键
箭头键
非常小的(功能)键
非常小的(功能)键
电源按钮
电源按钮

触摸板

触摸板
触摸板

触摸板相当大(约13×6.8厘米,约5.1×2.7英寸),下面有专用的鼠标键。 指纹传感器集成在左上角。手指在上面和左边的移动不会被记录。

表面允许手指轻松滑动,即使在慢速运动中也几乎没有任何停顿。

下面的额外的鼠标键很宽,第一眼就能给人留下好印象。鼠标点击的音量也处于适中的水平。然而,当仔细聆听时,按键会产生一些轻微的吱吱声。

显示屏 - 4K,色彩空间覆盖率高

一个哑光的、有颗粒感的像素网格
一个哑光的、有颗粒感的像素网格

哑光4K IPS显示屏与去年的Schenker XMG Ultra 17所使用的相同。不幸的是,由于4K分辨率的原因,你必须做的是没有更高的刷新率。另外,这款笔记本电脑也可以选择全高清显示屏和快速的300赫兹。

此外,该面板非常明亮,亮度分布也还算不错。黑值和对比度也处于良好水平,后者甚至略高于竞争对手的水平。

不太好的是非常蹩脚的响应时间。结合较低的刷新率,这也表明配备4K显示屏的XMG Pro 17更多的是针对创意专业人士,而游戏玩家可能更愿意选择全高清型号,这取决于他们的偏好。

我们没有检测到任何PWM。即使在黑暗中非常仔细地观察,我们也只能在底部边缘看到一些最小的屏幕出血(但在截图中看不到),所以这并不是什么问题。

470
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO B173ZAN3.0 (AUO309B) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 492 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 451.1 cd/m² Minimum: 28 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 471 cd/m²
Contrast: 1397:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.51
ΔE Greyscale 6.56 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
AUO B173ZAN3.0 (AUO309B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung ATNA56WR14-0, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
AU Optronics B173ZAN, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Medion Erazer Beast X25
BOE NE173FHM-NZ1 (BOE0884), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
AUO B173ZAN06.1 (AUODE95), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
BOE099D (BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Display
-7%
0%
-16%
-23%
-3%
Display P3 Coverage
87.1
81.2
-7%
88.3
1%
70.4
-19%
63
-28%
94.2
8%
sRGB Coverage
100
97.7
-2%
100
0%
99.8
0%
94.8
-5%
98.7
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
100
89.1
-11%
100
0%
71.6
-28%
65
-35%
84.4
-16%
Response Times
94%
69%
82%
81%
83%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
46.8 ?(23.4, 23.4)
3.2 ?(1.2, 2)
93%
14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)
69%
9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4)
80%
8.8 ?(2.8, 6)
81%
4.8
90%
Response Time Black / White *
32.6 ?(16.6, 16)
1.6 ?(1, 0.6)
95%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
68%
5.6 ?(2.8, 2.8)
83%
6.4 ?(2, 4.4)
80%
8
75%
PWM Frequency
60 ?(81)
Screen
212%
13%
17%
22%
11%
Brightness middle
475
443
-7%
438.7
-8%
329
-31%
474
0%
322
-32%
Brightness
451
434
-4%
435
-4%
315
-30%
454
1%
288
-36%
Brightness Distribution
84
94
12%
91
8%
88
5%
88
5%
72
-14%
Black Level *
0.34
0.02
94%
0.48
-41%
0.33
3%
0.46
-35%
0.3
12%
Contrast
1397
22150
1486%
914
-35%
997
-29%
1030
-26%
1073
-23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.84
3.73
36%
4.34
26%
2.03
65%
1.5
74%
3.05
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.97
8.12
19%
7.3
27%
5.5
45%
5.59
44%
5.23
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.51
0.72
79%
0.82
77%
0.86
75%
1.92
45%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.56
2.5
62%
2.4
63%
3.5
47%
2.8
57%
3.11
53%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.001 110%
2.09 105%
2.223 99%
2.158 102%
2.13 103%
CCT
6376 102%
6522 100%
6413 101%
6526 100%
6597 99%
6553 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
84
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
Total Average (Program / Settings)
100% / 144%
27% / 18%
28% / 19%
27% / 21%
30% / 18%

* ... smaller is better

Schenker宣传该显示器是由X-Rite校准的颜色,但颜色偏差仍有改进的余地。暖色调、红色调占主导地位,至少在全亮度下是如此。手动校准进一步降低了Delta-E值,你可以从上面的链接中下载相应的ICC配置文件。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜料检查器
颜料检查器
灰度标定
灰度标定
饱和度校验
饱和度校验
校准的ColorChecker
校准的ColorChecker

该显示器非常适用于图像处理和视频编辑,因为各种色彩空间都被很好地覆盖。虽然sRGB和AdobeRGB被完全覆盖,但DCI-P3仍被覆盖到87%。

Alienware的4K面板和华硕Zephyrus的2K面板也同样不错,Medion Erazer Beast和微星GS76 Stealth在这里的表现更差,但这也是价格的问题。

sRGB 100%
sRGB 100%
AdobeRGB 99.9
AdobeRGB 99.9
DCI-P3 87.1%
DCI-P3 87.1%

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.6 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.4 ms rise
↘ 23.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在户外,哑光表面、超过400尼特的高亮度、良好的视角和相当高的对比度将使你受益,让你在大多数情况下阅读显示内容而不会受到太大的影响。

可视角度的稳定性还不错,尽管在极端的可视角度下亮度会明显下降。 有一些IPS面板的可视角度甚至更稳定。

Performance - Throttled for the slim case

Schenker为XMG Pro 17做了广告,目标是游戏玩家以及专业用户。该 英特尔酷睿i7-11800H和特别是 NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080笔记本GPU,以及充足的32GB内存支持这一原因。另一方面,4K显示屏只有60赫兹,但色彩空间覆盖率非常好,这表明这款笔记本电脑的目标略微偏向创意用户的需求,而不是游戏玩家。另外,你也不会真的指望从一个超薄的设计中获得最高的游戏性能。例如,显卡的TGP被限制在相对较弱的105瓦特。

 

测试条件

XMG的性能模式
XMG的性能模式

Schenker对其各种性能配置的性能值相当透明。制造商官方推荐的 "娱乐 "模式是噪音量和性能之间的最佳折衷方案。然而,由于我们在最佳性能模式(不超频)下测量所有的游戏笔记本电脑,我们在控制中心中改为 "性能 "模式。只有在这里,GPU也被允许使用动态提升,而且CPU的TDP也略高。下面的图片显示了申克公司列出的所有模式的性能值。

取决于性能模式的TDP和TGP(图片来源:Schenker)。
取决于性能模式的TDP和TGP(图片来源:Schenker)。

处理器

英特尔酷睿i7-11800H提供了充足的八个核心,其时钟速度在2.3和4.6GHz之间。

在Cinebench循环中,数值在前四或五次循环内下降了约7%,但之后保持稳定。

尽管它们使用相同的CPU,但在多核测试中,XMG Pro无法跟上强大的、没有节流的Alienware X17,而其他竞争者则略微领先于它。然而,这些微小的差异在日常操作中并不重要,只有Alienware的速度明显快了10-15%。

在单核测试中,笔记本电脑之间的差异明显更小。

在电池模式下,CPU的性能要低得多。在13瓦的初始值之后,TDP下降到只有11.5瓦。相应地,得分从1,865-2,009降至只有534分,这至少减少了71%!这也是一个很好的例子。

主电源与电池运行时的TDP
主电源与电池运行时的TDP

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1879 (1859.17-2009.14)
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2136 (2089.97-2164.85)
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2004 (1981.96-2041.34)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H: Ø2117 (2043.84-2183.76)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
83.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
61.2 pt
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
58.8 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
58.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
57.4 pt
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
57.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
56.5 pt
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
 
53.9 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)
21651 Points +77%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
14011 (13899.7min - 14010.8max) Points +14%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
13012 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12721 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
12720 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12373 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12253 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6508 - 14088, n=48)
11650 Points -5%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)
1877 Points +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1586 Points +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1575 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1516 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1513 Points 0%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
1508 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1522, n=45)
1497 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1491 Points -2%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points +77%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
5383 Points +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5023 Points +8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
4878 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4776 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4756 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4647 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2498 - 5408, n=50)
4459 Points -4%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points +23%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
610 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
608 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
585 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
585 Points 0%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
581 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=47)
576 Points -2%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +69%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
2184 (2043.84min - 2183.76max) Points +9%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
2165 (2089.97min - 2164.85max) Points +8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
2148 (1832.59min - 2147.65max) Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
2050 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2041 (1981.96min - 2041.34max) Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
2009 (1859.17min - 2009.14max) Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=50)
1894 Points -6%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
241 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
239 Points +4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
238 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
225 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
225 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (201 - 231, n=46)
225 Points -2%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 454, n=46)
277 Seconds * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
256 Seconds *
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
250 Seconds * +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
249 Seconds * +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
243 Seconds * +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
231 Seconds * +10%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
219 Seconds * +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)
172.1 Seconds * +33%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)
84653 MIPS +65%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
59182 MIPS +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
57263 MIPS +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
55743 MIPS +8%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
54133 MIPS +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
53205 MIPS +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
51421 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (33718 - 56758, n=46)
48384 MIPS -6%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)
6281 MIPS +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5795 MIPS +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5664 MIPS +1%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
5640 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5587 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5521 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5732, n=46)
5492 MIPS -2%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
5367 MIPS -4%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)
14891 Points +59%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
9856 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
9628 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
9408 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
9380 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
9294 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4655 - 9851, n=40)
8551 Points -9%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)
1882 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1648 Points +3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1632 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1602 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1571 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1429 - 1625, n=40)
1561 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1529 Points -5%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)
23.3 fps +56%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
17.2 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
16.7 fps +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.8 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.7 fps +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
15 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
14.9 fps
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (7.38 - 17.4, n=46)
13.8 fps -7%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
49.3 s * -1%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
49.3 s * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
48.8 s * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
48.7 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)
47.6 s * +2%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.5 s * +5%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 59.9, n=45)
46.5 s * +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
44.4 s * +9%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.615, n=46)
0.566 sec * -3%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.565 sec * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.549 sec *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.549 sec * -0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.533 sec * +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.53 sec * +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4926 sec * +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)
0.4402 sec * +20%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2009 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
197 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
229 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4647 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
585 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1516 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12253 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
97.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
72.1 pt
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
 
64 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)
21640 KRay/s +50%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
14463 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8772 - 15961, n=20)
13481 KRay/s -7%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)
106090 Points +74%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
60967 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (39404 - 65636, n=20)
57444 Points -6%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)
4852 MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
4109 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2599 - 4439, n=20)
3855 MB/s -6%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)
116237 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
91605 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (85233 - 91941, n=20)
90603 Points -1%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)
13175 Points +35%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
9775 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6420 - 9792, n=20)
9145 Points -6%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)
53471 Points +47%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
36460 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (23365 - 39464, n=20)
34552 Points -5%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
142475 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (74617 - 149388, n=20)
123317 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)
109176 MB/s -23%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)
1349 MB/s +75%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
773 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (461 - 830, n=43)
358 (461min - 830max) MB/s -54%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)
11654 KRay/s +49%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
7830 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4545 - 8717, n=21)
7332 KRay/s -6%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)
39919 MPixel/s +50%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
26597 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (11898 - 26757, n=21)
22376 MPixel/s -16%

系统性能

在PCMark 10中,XMG Pro不一定能提供最强大的性能,可以说很温和。通常情况下,测试中的竞争对手仍然相当接近,但我们的测试设备总是落后于竞争对手约8%(微星)至18%(Alienware)。虽然在这个性能级别中,这在日常操作中不会真的那么明显,因为一切都运行顺畅,但对于性能爱好者来说,这款超薄笔记本电脑的PCMark分数让人失望。

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +11%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
7470 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7245 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (6673 - 7470, n=11)
7154 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6996 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6842 Points -2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6822 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6673 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)
10836 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10630 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (9862 - 11064, n=11)
10328 Points +3%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
10130 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10024 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10018 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9862 Points -2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9690 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)
9878 Points +8%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
9803 Points +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9252 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9182 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9126 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8278 - 9803, n=11)
9115 Points 0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8882 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8278 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)
12030 Points +18%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
11323 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10573 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (9881 - 11323, n=11)
10560 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10160 Points
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10014 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9881 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9377 Points -8%
PCMark 10 Score
6996 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)
64907 MB/s +37%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
48016 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
47304 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
42811 MB/s -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (24508 - 48144, n=21)
42778 MB/s -10%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)
68658 MB/s +44%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
48045 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
47698 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (25882 - 50365, n=20)
45259 MB/s -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
44887 MB/s -6%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)
66727 MB/s +45%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46718 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46214 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46176 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (22240 - 46214, n=20)
42489 MB/s -8%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
93.6 ns * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
92.3 ns *
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
85.8 ns * +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (71.9 - 104.1, n=44)
43.3 (71.9min - 104.1max) ns * +53%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

当刚打开网络浏览器(Edge)时,LatencyMon软件已经遇到了一些延迟问题。在播放我们的4K、60帧的YouTube测试视频(32个丢帧)或短暂启动Prime95测试时,这些问题会增加。

故障似乎主要在于NT的ACPI驱动,但也有一个Nvidia驱动给系统带来一些问题。

然而,在我们的比较中,延迟值的大小更多的是处于中间位置,而且比较的笔记本电脑也不是没有问题。只是他们的延迟开始得比较晚,而且绝对不是在刚开始使用浏览器的时候。

YouTube测试视频
YouTube测试视频
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4407 μs * -250%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1445 μs * -15%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1259 μs *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1056 μs * +16%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
907 μs * +28%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
762 μs * +39%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

Schenker使用了成熟而快速的三星SSD 980 Pro,拥有1TB的存储空间。它的性能处于最高端,只有同一制造商的PM9A1(微星,华硕Zephyrus)在某些方面稍快。

在不断的读取测试中,随着时间的推移,非常高的性能略有下降,但它应该仍然高于一些竞争对手的性能。

水晶石标记
水晶石标记
AS SSD
AS SSD
AS SSD复制
AS SSD复制
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7109 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5188 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 754 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 580 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 93.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 243 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1666 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2849 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
93.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
90.4 pt
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
83.6 pt
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
 
78.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
72.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
70.7 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
53.5 pt
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
51.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4645 (4634.08min - 4645.19max) MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4285 (4213.14min - 4284.51max) MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3980 (3953.55min - 3979.77max) MB/s -7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2659 - 4315, n=26)
3877 MB/s -10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3829 (3821.85min - 3829.08max) MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)
3487 MB/s -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2376 (2356.88min - 2376.42max) MB/s -45%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
2161 (2137.42min - 2160.91max) MB/s -50%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4574 (4560.15min - 4574.31max) MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4325 (4312.56min - 4324.91max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4318 (3897.94min - 4317.86max) MB/s 0%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2839 - 4493, n=26)
3893 MB/s -10%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3834 (3789.52min - 3833.59max) MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)
3797 MB/s -12%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
2978 (2936.01min - 2977.75max) MB/s -31%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2461 (2448.92min - 2461.11max) MB/s -43%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7089 (6335.16min - 7089.42max) MB/s +6%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
6684 (5510.27min - 6684.46max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6672 (6155.41min - 6672.09max) MB/s 0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6670 (6036.74min - 6669.78max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6666 (6346.92min - 6665.59max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3227 - 6902, n=26)
6544 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)
6328 MB/s -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3471 (3205.62min - 3471.02max) MB/s -48%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5251 (5213.16min - 5250.64max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5006 (4951.75min - 5006.11max) MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4949 (4924.12min - 4949.28max) MB/s -1%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4917 (4616.04min - 4917.19max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3184 - 5087, n=26)
4879 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)
4823 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4124 (2287.86min - 4123.91max) MB/s -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3537 (3525.65min - 3537.42max) MB/s -29%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
93.6 (93.28min - 93.6max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
91.2 (91.05min - 91.17max) MB/s -3%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (61.1 - 94.3, n=26)
79.9 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)
65.8 MB/s -30%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
62.7 (62.59min - 62.69max) MB/s -33%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
62.4 (62.03min - 62.36max) MB/s -33%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
56.2 (55.28min - 56.2max) MB/s -40%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
51.2 (51.08min - 51.21max) MB/s -45%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
255 (254.32min - 255.35max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
248 (247.22min - 247.96max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
246 (245.08min - 246.35max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)
222 MB/s -10%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (132.2 - 311, n=26)
217 MB/s -12%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
174 (171.94min - 173.87max) MB/s -30%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
166 (164.47min - 165.73max) MB/s -33%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
134 (134.04min - 134.47max) MB/s -46%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4198 (4186.31min - 4197.96max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4192 (4183.34min - 4192.34max) MB/s 0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4071 (4064.6min - 4070.6max) MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4060 (4051.28min - 4059.64max) MB/s -3%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (895 - 4483, n=26)
3197 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)
2555 MB/s -39%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1393 (1367.28min - 1392.8max) MB/s -67%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
724 (719.56min - 724.12max) MB/s -83%
4k q32 t16 write
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3531 (3517.4min - 3531.03max) MB/s +188%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3437 (3425.9min - 3437.33max) MB/s +181%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (345 - 4383, n=26)
2341 MB/s +91%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)
2101 MB/s +72%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1225 (1217.23min - 1224.73max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1184 (1165.59min - 1184.31max) MB/s -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
509 (508.08min - 509.24max) MB/s -58%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
376 (372.82min - 375.8max) MB/s -69%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9011 Points
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8830 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8380 Points -7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3394 - 9322, n=24)
7334 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)
6737 Points -25%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6065 Points -33%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5733 Points -36%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4314 Points -52%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3372 Points
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3285 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3161 Points -6%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1501 - 3512, n=24)
2811 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2673 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)
2441 Points -28%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1801 Points -47%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1648 Points -51%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3980 Points
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3953 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3631 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3269 Points -18%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1130 - 4194, n=24)
3159 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)
3113 Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2211 Points -44%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1737 Points -56%
Seq Read
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5408 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5315 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5274 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5085 MB/s -4%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4978 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)
4944 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (545 - 5692, n=24)
4838 MB/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2591 MB/s -51%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4434 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3920 MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3863 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)
3720 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1613 - 4136, n=24)
3490 MB/s -11%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
2058 MB/s -47%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1900 MB/s -52%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1613 MB/s -59%
4K Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
86.2 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
80.3 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (53.5 - 86.8, n=24)
72 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)
65.1 MB/s -24%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
55 MB/s -36%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
53.9 MB/s -37%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
52.7 MB/s -39%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
43.4 MB/s -50%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
220.6 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
214.7 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)
211 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
208.7 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (134.6 - 254, n=24)
188.8 MB/s -14%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
153.1 MB/s -31%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
146.9 MB/s -33%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
112.6 MB/s -49%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2754 MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2692 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2573 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (915 - 2938, n=24)
2234 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2091 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)
1876 MB/s -32%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1335 MB/s -52%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1260 MB/s -54%
4K-64 Write
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3414 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3367 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2972 MB/s -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2966 MB/s -12%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (557 - 3708, n=24)
2622 MB/s -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)
2533 MB/s -25%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1841 MB/s -45%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1385 MB/s -59%
Access Time Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.067 ms * -97%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)
0.05509 ms * -62%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.046 ms * -35%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (0.022 - 0.073, n=24)
0.04075 ms * -20%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
0.039 ms * -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.038 ms * -12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.034 ms *
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.018 ms * +47%
Access Time Write
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
0.074 ms * -289%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)
0.04843 ms * -155%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.036 ms * -89%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (0.018 - 0.089, n=24)
0.03363 ms * -77%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.027 ms * -42%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.02 ms * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.02 ms * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.019 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

034068010201360170020402380272030603400374040804420476051005440578061206460Tooltip

图形卡

16GB版本的NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑GPU被使用,但它只允许消耗90瓦,加上15瓦的动态提升,导致总的最大功率为105瓦。相比之下,Zephyrus S17的功率高达140瓦,Alienware X17 R1甚至达到165瓦。这表明,由于超薄的外壳,Schenker不得不做出一些妥协,更多的是为了提高效率而不是最大的性能。

虽然我们的测试装置的配置不提供先进的Optimus,但你可以在BIOS中通过MUX为USB-C端口选择是否应该通过iGPU或dGPU连接。

GPU的规格(Nvidia系统控制)。
GPU的规格(Nvidia系统控制)。

在3DMark测试中,XMG Pro的表现相应地略低于平均水平,但它在某些方面仍然比微星甚至Medion笔记本电脑表现得更好。华硕ROG Zephyrus和Alienware显然更快。

在电池模式下,大部分的3D性能都会丢失。 Witcher 3 Ultra"不是以90-107帧的速度运行,而是只能以8-10帧的速度运行,这让它无法播放。所以离开了插座,你只能玩休闲或古老的游戏。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
97.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
91.9 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
 
82.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021) -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
81.9 pt
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
78.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
77.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
72.5 pt
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
65.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +15%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
42555 Points +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (31288 - 43744, n=40)
38259 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
38087 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
37779 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
36134 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
35678 Points -6%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
34062 Points -10%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
161692 Points +178%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
142796 Points +146%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (38816 - 192950, n=35)
116297 Points +100%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
95835 Points +65%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
58097 Points
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
53147 Points -9%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
50300 Points -13%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
28939 Points +3%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
28687 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
28036 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (16455 - 32366, n=46)
27420 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
26868 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
26771 Points -5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
25043 Points -11%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points +29%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
12055 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
11424 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
10752 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (6407 - 13210, n=45)
10681 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10098 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
9981 Points -1%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
9377 Points -7%
3DMark 11 Performance
28822 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
36099 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21796 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9917 points
Help

游戏性能

XMG Pro能够在全高清状态下流畅地玩所有的游戏,但节流的RTX 3080在原生4K分辨率的非常现代的游戏中会出一些汗。例如,4K和最大细节的"新世界"在开始的序列中只能以37帧运行,在一些复杂的战斗中,可能已经有一些停滞。在"Far Cry 5"中在相同的设置下,至少可以达到56帧的好成绩。

正如预期的那样,根据不同的游戏,其性能将略低于普通的RTX 3080,但在一些游戏中,TGP的劣势几乎无法察觉。相应地,该卡将再次排在中间位置,与3DMark测试中的顺序相似。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years)
238 fps +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
197.1 fps +4%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
192 (183min) fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (149 - 242, n=32)
190.8 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
189 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
176 (29.8min, 59P0.1, 119P1) fps -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
175 (146min) fps -7%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
174 (141min) fps -8%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
112 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
109 fps
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
105.2 (98min) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (85.1 - 123, n=40)
105.1 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
100 (34.2min, 39.9P0.1, 63.9P1) fps -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
97.9 (84min) fps -10%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
93.8 (75min) fps -14%
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (50.6 - 167.6, n=43, last 2 years)
111.4 fps +86%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
80.2 (75min) fps +34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (60 - 82.2, n=11)
71.7 fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
69.6 (25.8min, 36.3P0.1, 52.6P1) fps +16%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
66.7 (57min) fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
60 fps
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (42.8 - 107.6, n=11, last 2 years)
71.6 fps +40%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
51.6 (48min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
51 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (47 - 51.6, n=5)
49 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
47 (26.5min, 27.2P0.1, 34.3P1) fps -8%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (35 - 232, n=100, last 2 years)
139.4 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
134 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
128 fps
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
125 (93min) fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
123 (103min) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (79 - 155, n=28)
121.7 fps -5%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
120 (98min) fps -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
119 (94min) fps -7%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years)
130.5 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
125 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
120 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
115 (88min) fps -4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
114 (78min) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (75 - 146, n=33)
113.7 fps -5%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
112 (86min) fps -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
110 (83min) fps -8%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (71 - 194, n=82, last 2 years)
118.9 fps +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
103 fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (86 - 112, n=17)
101.6 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
101 fps
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
98 (80min) fps -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
95 (81min) fps -6%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
90 (80min) fps -11%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (39 - 113, n=29, last 2 years)
84.5 fps +51%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
63 (55min) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (52 - 63, n=9)
56.6 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
56 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
54 (49min) fps -4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
52 (47min) fps -7%
New World
1920x1080 High Video Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (75.1 - 96.7, n=4)
86 fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
75.1 fps
1920x1080 Very High Video Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (71.5 - 90.4, n=4)
80.2 fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
71.5 fps
2560x1440 Very High Video Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (63.3 - 67.2, n=2)
65.3 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
63.3 fps
3840x2160 Very High Video Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (37.1 - 42.9, n=2)
40 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
37.1 fps
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
176 (3.22min, 125P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (24.2 - 187.1, n=146, last 2 years)
168.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
166 (6.59min, 111P1) fps
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
164 (5.22min, 100P1) fps
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
163 (16.4min, 111P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (137 - 176, n=30)
162.8 fps
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
157 (4.69min, 100P1) fps
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)
113 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
112 (6.15min, 76.9P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
102 (19.1min, 71.4P1) fps
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
98.5 (17.3min, 62.5P1) fps
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
98.1 (9.21min, 71.4P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (68.6 - 114.6, n=34)
97.7 fps
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
91.9 (26.9min, 66.7P1) fps
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (36.9 - 160.6, n=113, last 2 years)
106.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (82.2 - 99.1, n=12)
91.6 fps
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
89.2 (7.71min, 62.5P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
85.7 (35.3min, 58.8P1) fps
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
82.3 (16.3min, 58.8P1) fps
3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (33.6 - 90.9, n=41, last 2 years)
65.6 fps
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
57.8 (8.03min, 41.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (32.4 - 57.8, n=9)
50 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
48.6 (7.94min, 33.3P1) fps
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Gaming
  (49.4 - 465, n=155, last 2 years)
253 fps +24%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
225 (96.9min, 169P1) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (165 - 248, n=30)
212 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
210 (112min, 146P1) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
204 (42.5min, 152P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
201 (65.5min, 153P1) fps -1%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
185 (31.9min, 133P1) fps -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
180 (70.1min, 121P1) fps -12%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)
227 fps +25%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
199 (44.5min, 144P1) fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
186 (93.1min, 142P1) fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (117 - 219, n=34)
184 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
182 (75.8min, 132P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
176 (116min, 133P1) fps -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
168 (63.8min, 123P1) fps -8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
165 (97.3min, 123P1) fps -9%
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (52.8 - 322, n=123, last 2 years)
189.9 fps
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
152 (81.4min, 123P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (123 - 165, n=14)
142.9 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
130 (52.7min, 104P1) fps
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
123 (36.9min, 94.8P1) fps
3840x2160 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (54.5 - 298, n=49, last 2 years)
118.5 fps
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
91.6 (64.5min, 78.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (55.9 - 91.7, n=12)
77.8 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
76 (61.3min, 63.9P1) fps
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
72.1 (46.2min, 60.4P1) fps
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Gaming
  (31.6 - 244, n=189, last 2 years)
160 fps +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
148 (8.7min) fps +10%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
146 (120.5min) fps +9%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
143 (121.6min) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
137 (109.1min) fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (108.1 - 161, n=45)
134.5 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
134 (117.3min) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
126 (111.5min) fps -6%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)
149.3 fps +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
138 (121.1min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
136 (109.5min) fps
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
135 (117.3min) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
132 (109.4min) fps -3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
131 (113.6min) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (98 - 156, n=45)
126.5 fps -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
119 (104.1min) fps -12%
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (26.5 - 205, n=67, last 2 years)
143.4 fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
119 (96.7min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
116 (95.6min) fps -3%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
111 (96.7min) fps -7%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
110 (8.5min) fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (55.2 - 128, n=17)
106 fps -11%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)
119 fps +26%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
106 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (55.5 - 115, n=34)
99.2 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
97.5 fps +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
97 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
94.2 fps
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
88 (56min) fps -7%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (32.5 - 169.2, n=134, last 2 years)
104 fps +42%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
81.8 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (61.6 - 90.3, n=18)
79.4 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
74.6 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
73.1 fps
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
71.2 (44min) fps -3%
3840x2160 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (32.2 - 94.7, n=53, last 2 years)
66.4 fps +52%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
50.8 fps +17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
44.1 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
43.6 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (28.4 - 53.2, n=16)
43.5 fps 0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
42.9 (27min) fps -2%
X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)
107.2 fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
102 fps +15%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
89.2 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
88.8 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
88.5 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (65.6 - 113, n=44)
84 fps -5%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
79.7 fps -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
72.1 fps -19%
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (26.3 - 145.5, n=64, last 2 years)
101.5 fps +49%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
67.9 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
67.9 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (39.9 - 88.6, n=17)
66.5 fps -2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
63.2 fps -7%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
56.9 fps -16%

在一个小时内,《Witcher 3 》的帧率只在开始时从大约109帧下降到100帧,降幅很小。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU: Ø101 (96-109)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 151 262 189 109 60
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 178 151 134 136 119
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 187 123 94.2 73.1 43.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 125 110 88.8 67.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 170 135 128 120 101 56
Strange Brigade (2018) 472 254 204 182
New World (2021) 97.4 80.8 75.1 71.5 63.3 37.1

排放 - 相当大的噪音和热量

噪声排放

纤细的外形因素在这里付出了代价,噪音负荷比大多数竞争对手要高一些,只有Medion的野兽才有类似的声音。在最大负荷下,XMG甚至是我们测试领域中最响亮的,尽管其RTX TGP有限。即使在空闲运行时,风扇也大部分时间是打开的。静音 "模式只有在最低性能设置下才对得起它的名字,即使在空闲运行时也是如此。

在平均负荷下(3DMark 06的第一个基准),风扇已经变得相当响亮,在"TheWitcher 3 ,"噪音水平甚至高于51分贝。我们没有注意到任何电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
24 / 31.26 / 38.64 dB(A)
Load
48.11 / 56.74 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.732.434.72540.137.440.13143.141.243.14033.128.533.15032.327.132.36330.829.830.8803027.43010031.325.431.312528.22128.216031.319.131.320031.822.231.825034.220.834.231538.613.938.640041.813.441.850043.710.443.763041.98.741.980044.610.144.6100045.58.845.5125046.49.246.4160048.39.948.3200046.89.846.8250045.110.645.1315043.21143.2400043.611.343.6500045.711.545.7630042.911.742.9800039.111.739.11000038.311.638.31250035.912.335.91600028.412.528.4SPL56.723.856.7N11.30.511.3median 41.9median 11.6median 41.9Delta6.12.96.137.238.339.437.841.633.934.8373534.641.543.948.545.545.129.630.835.432.432.327.733.828.82831.929.435.828.925.232.8342622.218.632.727.62319.416.827.828.923.926.117.129.830.324.325.819.732.53239.925.225.133.533.829.922.619.835.836.828.522.315.939.439.742.225.213.440.138.131.722.212.238.93828.817.312.138.43928.817.311.739.241.729.417.611.542.844.731.81911.945.245.832.419.51246.243.429.816.712.143.642.428.315.81243.341.426.915.812.542.441.326.715.913.141.84329.117.813.644.341.223.415.41342.838.516.513.613.139.238.115.813.313.337.834.114.813.712.93333.314.713.212.129.554.142.630.225.354.99.54.21.40.710median 38.5median 28.5median 17.6median 13median 39.24.43.64.21.94.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)Medion Erazer Beast X25
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Noise
-11%
11%
-4%
5%
16%
off / environment *
24
24
-0%
24.9
-4%
25
-4%
24
-0%
23
4%
Idle Minimum *
24
31
-29%
24.9
-4%
26
-8%
24
-0%
23
4%
Idle Average *
31.26
37
-18%
24.9
20%
30
4%
25
20%
23
26%
Idle Maximum *
38.64
41
-6%
29.6
23%
43
-11%
42
-9%
23
40%
Load Average *
48.11
56
-16%
31.1
35%
54
-12%
46
4%
41
15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51.5
53
-3%
49.7
3%
52
-1%
48
7%
45
13%
Load Maximum *
56.74
58
-2%
54.8
3%
55
3%
48
15%
52
8%

* ... smaller is better

温度

尽管风扇的声音大了一些,性能也降低了,但冷却系统很难将表面温度保持在适度范围内。虽然在最高53°C(127°F)时,顶部达到了与竞争对手相似的温度,但我们在底部测得的温度高达68°C(154°F),这对我们的口味来说绝对是太高了。15英寸机型在底部的温度也明显高于顶部。在最新的压力测试中,你应该把XMG Pro 17从你的腿上拿开。

即使在压力测试期间,掌托仍然相对凉爽,整个左侧包括WASD键受到热量发展的影响较小。至少,这台17英寸的笔记本电脑在空闲运行时保持相对凉爽。

压力测试 - 顶部
压力测试 - 顶部
压力测试底部
压力测试底部
TheWitcher 3 - 顶部
TheWitcher 3 - 顶部
TheWitcher 3 - 底部
TheWitcher 3 - 底部
Max. Load
 40 °C49 °C49 °C 
 43 °C53 °C52 °C 
 30 °C35 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 53 °C
Average: 42.7 °C
66 °C68 °C54 °C
49 °C56 °C49 °C
35 °C37 °C35 °C
Maximum: 68 °C
Average: 50.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  65 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 68 °C / 154 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Heat
-1%
-8%
-9%
3%
-11%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
44
17%
58.4
-10%
54
-2%
49
8%
59
-11%
Maximum Bottom *
68
60
12%
49
28%
57
16%
57
16%
53
22%
Idle Upper Side *
27
30
-11%
33.6
-24%
34
-26%
28
-4%
35
-30%
Idle Bottom *
28
34
-21%
34.6
-24%
35
-25%
30
-7%
35
-25%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

核心以大约4.2 GHz的速度开始压力测试。然而,几秒钟后,CPU的温度就达到了90°C(194°F)以上,热节流功能开始发挥作用。在整个测试过程中,时钟速度继续下降。大约30分钟后,它只有3GHz,一小时后,只有2.8GHz,几分钟后,只有2.7GHz。当这种情况发生时,CPU的温度往往非常高,持续达到90℃(194°F),节流的目标温度约为85℃(185°F)。

GPU开始时的时钟速度约为1.5 GHz。根据热负荷,速度有时会下降到1.2GHz,然后再恢复到1.3GHz以上。这里的温度也达到了相当高的85℃(185°F),甚至暂时更高。

在压力测试之后,系统恢复得相当快。 紧接着进行的3DMark 11测试的结果是比平时低了大约3-4%。

压力测试开始
压力测试开始
14分钟后的压力测试
14分钟后的压力测试
1小时后的压力测试
1小时后的压力测试
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(℃) GPU平均温度(℃)
系统空闲 3.6 350 (iGPU) 35 35
Prime95 + FurMark压力 2.6 1,230 - 1,375 88 85

发言人

扬声器产生了相当好的最大音量和平衡、线性的高频。虽然中音的表现略显不足,但低音却几乎没有,尽管是17英寸的外形尺寸。

你可以使用耳机或线路输入端口连接外部音频设备。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.927.933.92534.932.234.93138.136.838.14035.525.435.55034.324.734.36335.931.935.98038.723.138.710046.924.946.912544.918.944.916037.816.237.820042.422.842.42504521.34531550.318.850.34005212.45250055.810.355.863069.38.669.3800778.777100078.78.378.71250808.580160080.2980.2200077.39.777.3250073.410.173.4315071.91171.9400072.411.272.4500069.711.569.7630068.511.768.5800068.511.968.51000067.811.767.81250065.111.665.11600066.110.766.1SPL87.423.787.4N64.20.564.2median 68.5median 11.5median 68.5Delta123.31235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--效率高,但供电能力弱

消耗功率

有时,电力供应不足
有时,电力供应不足

在空闲运行期间,XMG Pro 17呈现出相对高效的特点。在游戏时,我们的测试设备也比Alienware或华硕ROG的耗电量略低,但这些设备的性能明显更高。总的来说,消耗水平与性能相对应。

我们测量的最高消耗量为227瓦。然而,附带的LiteOn电源的额定功率只有180瓦。即使在最大消耗以外的时间,这也会成为一个问题。例如,在压力测试期间,它不断使用约200瓦。在这种极端情况下,电源无法为笔记本电脑可靠地充电。

Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 13.6 / 19.4 / 27.7 Watt
Load midlight 110 / 227 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Medion Erazer Beast X25
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-9%
-21%
-24%
1%
-21%
-18%
0%
Idle Minimum *
13.6
20
-47%
10.2
25%
22
-62%
14
-3%
21.7
-60%
19.8 ?(8 - 62, n=35)
-46%
Idle Average *
19.4
22
-13%
21.2
-9%
26
-34%
19
2%
27
-39%
24.3 ?(11.7 - 64, n=35)
-25%
Idle Maximum *
27.7
26
6%
48.4
-75%
34
-23%
31
-12%
33
-19%
33.3 ?(12 - 69, n=35)
-20%
Load Average *
110
103
6%
118.7
-8%
120
-9%
97
12%
108
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
170
186
-9%
249
-46%
189
-11%
156
8%
195
-15%
Load Maximum *
227
218
4%
262
-15%
231
-2%
231
-2%
210
7%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø173.5 (160.37-192.77)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø209 (168.92-227.36)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø125.2 (123.23-127)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø116.4 (114.53-118.25)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø159.3 (153.87-164.07)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø169.6 (167.36-173.82)

电池寿命

与15英寸机型一样,申克在这里也使用了73瓦时的电池。竞争对手提供87(Alienware)到几乎100Wh(MSI),但这并不一定导致对比机型的电池寿命更好。只有华硕ROG Zephyrus的90瓦时电池明显持续时间更长,其余竞争对手的部分表现甚至更糟,包括微星。

你可以计划在降低亮度的情况下看一个大约5小时的电影之夜,而在冲浪时,XMG的持续时间大约为40分钟。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
5h 40min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
4h 11min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 9min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 47min
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 87 Wh
Medion Erazer Beast X25
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 91 Wh
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-3%
-27%
-2%
-7%
41%
8%
H.264
309
392
27%
430
39%
WiFi v1.3
340
314
-8%
353
4%
410
21%
382
12%
449
32%
Load
107
78
-27%
45
-58%
81
-24%
79
-26%
162
51%
Reader / Idle
636
419
591
592
Witcher 3 ultra
62

Pros

+ 非常纤薄的游戏笔记本,金属外壳
+ 雷电4
+ 4K显示屏,具有良好的亮度和色彩空间覆盖率
+ 快速的SSD
+ 合适的电池寿命

Cons

- 键盘向下弯曲得很厉害
- 连接点放在一起
- 没有存储卡读卡器
- 显示屏响应时间慢,60赫兹
- 低于平均水平的GPU性能(低TGP)。
- 底部变得相当热
- 电源可能太小,有可能

评语--与其说是游戏笔记本,不如说是工作站

Schenker XMG Pro 17,测试装置由Schenker提供。
Schenker XMG Pro 17,测试装置由Schenker提供。

尽管XMG Pro 17想同时吸引游戏玩家以及创意专业人士,但它不太可能吸引游戏玩家中的性能爱好者,因为由于超薄的设计,有太多的性能妥协。然而,Schenker模型可能仍然对一些游戏者感兴趣。至少,这款配备RTX 3080的超薄笔记本电脑比大多数竞争对手更具有移动性,除了尺寸和重量之外,电池寿命也很合适。 明亮的4K显示屏,其大色彩空间覆盖率也是专业人士的一大优势,使其也适合视频编辑或图像处理。

凭借其强大的硬件,超薄外壳的缺点也很明显。笔记本电脑底部会相当热,并不真正安静,而且性能也低于许多竞争对手的水平。此外,摇晃的键盘底座有点令人讨厌,Schenker也应该重新考虑其电源,它真的太弱了。

除了4K显示屏之外,XMG Pro 17的大优势在于其超薄的外壳和相对较低的重量。那些喜欢移动性而不是最大性能的游戏玩家和专业人士应该给这个模型一个机会。

其他笔记本电脑也不是什么都做得很好,也许华硕ROG Zephyrus是个例外,它同样纤薄,但也比它重400克(约14盎司)。但是那款笔记本电脑几乎在所有方面都给我们留下了深刻印象,你在购买时只需注意一些单位的任何恼人的噪音。不幸的是,华硕的价格也更高一些,尽管XMG Pro也不是一个便宜货。那些想省钱的人应该看一下 微星GP66 Leopard,价格不到2000欧元(~$2286).

价格和可用性

XMG Pro 17在Schenker商店的价格为:2249欧元,配备全高清显示屏,配备4K显示屏的价格为278欧元。全高清显示屏,4K显示屏的价格为278欧元。Clevo PC70HS具有类似的结构,在Clevo商店的起价为 2560美元。.

SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080) - 01/13/2022 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze

Chassis
82 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
79%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
67 / 80 → 83%
Weight
60 / 10-66 → 90%
Battery
64 / 95 → 67%
Display
87%
Games Performance
96%
Application Performance
95%
Temperature
73 / 95 → 77%
Noise
64 / 90 → 71%
Audio
78%
Camera
36 / 85 → 42%
Average
74%
85%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 带有RTX 3080的Schenker XMG Pro 17(Clevo PC70HS)评测。一台节流的超轻薄游戏笔记本和工作站合二为一
Christian Hintze, 2022-01-18 (Update: 2022-01-18)