realme 9i智能手机评测--带立体声扬声器的经济实惠的中档机型
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.8 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Realme 9i SD 680, Adreno 610 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2412x1080 | |
| 78.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 186 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 1600x720 | |
| 80.5 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 | |
| 80.5 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 SD 678, Adreno 612 | 178.8 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 |
外壳和功能 - 不寻常的背板
realme 9i是目前realme 9系列中最便宜的智能手机，它代表了中端级别。只需花200多欧元，你就能得到一部背面装饰有垂直条纹图案的塑料智能手机。根据观察的角度，背面以这样的方式反射光线，使观察者看到条纹--这是一种有趣的效果，我们在任何其他智能手机上都没有遇到。
颜色选择是浅蓝色或黑色。我们的测试设备在屏幕上施加压力时，显示屏上很快出现斑点，但它们马上就消失了。因此，稳定性一般，但制造质量处于高水平。
制造商提供两种存储选项。
- realme 9i 64 GB大容量存储/4 GB内存：220欧元
- realme 9i 128 GB大容量存储/4 GB内存：240欧元
用于移动支付服务的NFC也在机上，蓝牙5.0和3.5毫米音频端口也可用。还有一个专门的microSD插槽，所以它可以和两个SIM卡一起使用。用我们的参考microSD卡Angelbird AV Pro V60进行的测试表明，该microSD读卡器在复制测试和CPDT基准测试中都达到了不错的数据传输速度。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Realme 9i (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - realme手机没有5G
在200欧元左右的价格范围内，WiFi 5是智能手机的等级标准。realme 9i满足了这一点，还提供了约300 Mbit/s的典型传输速率。然而，速度在实际平均速率附近波动很大，所以也会有下降的情况。
realme 9i不提供5G支持，可用的4G频率也不多，所以在旅行时，你可能会被切断移动互联网，这取决于国家的情况。在我们的样本测试中，接收强度明显低于高端智能手机，但在室内仍可使用。
Realme安装了Android 11和realmeUI 2.0作为操作系统。在测试时，安全补丁是2022年3月的，因此是最新的。Realme没有提供任何官方信息，说明这款智能手机的系统和安全更新将支持多长时间，但由于realme 7仍将获得Android 12，至少应该保证2次操作系统升级。
90赫兹的屏幕和现代的处理器使系统运行流畅。指纹传感器位于外壳右侧略微凹陷的待机按钮中，可以快速可靠地解锁设备。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Realme 9i | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Realme 9i | |
照相机--弱于弱光
realme 9i有一个5000万像素的主摄像头。然而，全分辨率只能在一个特殊模式下使用。通常情况下，通过像素分档，只用四分之一的分辨率记录照片，从而达到更高的光照强度。即使在放大的情况下，图像清晰度仍然很好，但像天空这样的大面积物体会出现条纹和颜色边缘。
这款相机显然在非常低的光线下很吃力，这也被我们照片实验室的照片所证明，在那里我们可以更好地调节照明条件。视频可以以1080p和30 fps的速度录制，自动对焦和亮度调节在这里工作得相当迅速和准确。数字变焦的平滑速度控制的可能性很好，所以可以创造出很酷的效果。
没有广角镜头，只有一个微距镜头，你可以在特殊模式下使用。第三个镜头包含了一个黑白传感器，用于支持主相机的模糊效果。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
显示器 - realme手机的明亮IPS屏幕
像A22 4G中的AMOLED显示屏 Galaxy A22 4G或 Redmi Note 10realme 9i中没有。相反，它有一个全高清IPS显示屏，平均最大亮度超过500cd/m²，令人信服。同样不错的是，亮度分布相当均匀。它是一个90赫兹的显示屏，可以动态地使帧率适应所观看的内容。然而，这种调整并不平滑，从30赫兹开始，有5个步骤。
0.6cd/m²的黑色值相当平庸，在明亮的颜色中明显可见的偏蓝也削弱了对画质的印象。蓝色调的色彩偏差相当高，但总体上仍在限制范围内。我们没有测量PWM
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 508 cd/m²
Contrast: 847:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.153
| Realme 9i IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Super AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.4" | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 75% | -70% | 84% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 6 ? 82% | 50 ? -47% | 4.8 ? 86% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 18 ? | 6 ? 67% | 34.8 ? -93% | 3.2 ? 82% |
| PWM Frequency | 127.6 | 250 ? | ||
| Screen | -27% | 2% | 37% | |
| Brightness middle | 508 | 349 -31% | 504 -1% | 695 37% |
| Brightness | 513 | 352 -31% | 499 -3% | 693 35% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 92 -5% | 91 -6% | 98 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.6 | 0.72 -20% | ||
| Contrast | 847 | 700 -17% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.68 | 5.87 -60% | 3.3 10% | 2.2 40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.36 | 15.51 -86% | 6 28% | 4.8 43% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 2.7 53% | 4.1 28% | 1.9 67% |
| Gamma | 2.153 102% | 2.07 106% | 2.28 96% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 7733 84% | 6970 93% | 7041 92% | 6286 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 24% /
-1% | -34% /
-12% | 61% /
49% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 一个真正的长跑运动员
该 高通骁龙680是一个相当新的SoC，为日常使用提供足够的性能。尽管采用了现代的6纳米制造工艺，但拥有8个内核的处理器通常只能与对比设备相提并论，而图形单元也提供了同类产品中的典型性能。
很好的是，realme安装了UFS 2.1存储，在我们的测试设备中实现了相当快的数据传输。在日常使用中，用户通常会有足够的动力在系统中顺利导航。只是在更复杂的应用程序中，智能手机显然不能提供像高端智能手机那样的动力。
令人高兴的是，即使在我们的基准测试中经过1小时的高负荷，realme手机的升温也被控制在限制范围内，最高为40.9℃。
作为奖励，realme 9i配备了立体声扬声器：听筒被用作第二个扬声器。声音系统可以变得相当响亮，但在清晰度方面并没有达到顶级水平。至少高音没有被过分强调，所以即使在高音量下，声音仍然比较悦耳。通过3.5毫米音频端口或蓝牙连接扬声器或耳机，效果会更好。这里支持许多编解码器，包括LDAC和aptX HD。
realme 9i配备了一个5000毫安的电池，可以用最大33瓦的功率充电。包括一个合适的充电器，当电池为空时，只需要一个多小时就能充满。在我们的WLAN测试中，该智能手机实现了约17:36小时的运行时间，这在同类比较中是一个很好的结果，在合理节俭使用的情况下，也足够在远离电源插座的几天内使用。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme 9i | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4.6 - 17, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme 9i | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (5.1 - 9.8, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme 9i | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2.7 - 11, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=208, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme 9i | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1.4 - 3.3, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=208, last 2 years) | |
| Realme 9i | Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -60% | -7% | -38% | -25% | 96% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 976 | 297.7 -69% | 964 -1% | 497.4 -49% | 760 ? -22% | 1889 ? 94% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 719 | 183 -75% | 471 -34% | 241.5 -66% | 297 ? -59% | 1473 ? 105% |
| Random Read 4KB | 176.8 | 101.2 -43% | 148.8 -16% | 131.5 -26% | 152.9 ? -14% | 278 ? 57% |
| Random Write 4KB | 137.4 | 66.9 -51% | 171.8 25% | 122.1 -11% | 131.6 ? -4% | 312 ? 127% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Realme 9i audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Realme 9i 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A22 4G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 1056 | 1252 19% | 966 -9% | 889 -16% | 995 ? -6% |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 明亮的屏幕和大电池，价格低廉
价格低廉的中档手机realme 9i绝对可以与对手竞争，它配备了明亮的屏幕和快速充电技术。在我们的测试中，它也被证明比许多类似价格的设备更耐用，不会过度发热。
电源开发足以让系统顺利运行，但它没有超过同类标准。
缺乏对5G的支持可能会让买家感到失望，而显示屏的明显偏蓝也应该在购买前考虑。弱光下的照片看起来相当阴暗，但我们喜欢正常光线下的照片，相当不错。只是遗憾的是，realme没有安装一个广角摄像头以提高灵活性。
价格便宜，漂亮，速度快。realme 9i相当有说服力，但在低光照方面有一个弱点。
总体而言，realme 9i值得购买。特别是如果你能以一个好价格买到它。这款 小米Poco M4 Pro 5G然而，它可以夸耀5G和更多的性能。如果你想拥有一个AMOLED屏幕，你可以仔细看一下 Redmi Note 10.
价格和可用性
realme 9i可直接从制造商那里获得64或128GB的。.但也有Cyberport和其他大型零售商，如amazon.de或notebooksbilliger.de有智能手机提供。
Realme 9i
- 04/02/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
