realme C31评测 - 低成本智能手机的旗舰?
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
75.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Realme C31 T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1 | 197 g | 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
77.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Realme C35 T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1 | 189 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
73.6 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy A03s Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320 | 196 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
77.1 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Motorola Moto E40 Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2 | 198 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能 - 做工良好,有真实感
realme希望在2022年的低价手机领域获得成功,并为200欧元以下的价格区间带来了一些不久前你还只能梦想的功能。
realme C31是中欧地区目前最便宜的产品。它有两个存储版本。
- realme C31 32GB大容量存储/3GB内存:140欧元
- realme C31 64GB大容量存储/4GB内存:160欧元
我们得到了32GB的realme C31,用于测试浅银色,这是与深绿色一起的两种颜色变体之一。这两种色调的背面都有轻微的纹理,巧妙地增强了外观,给人一种塑料面板的愉快感觉。折射光线的射线效果,使其似乎从相机模块发出,也相当漂亮--realme称之为动态纹理设计。
手机做工非常好,在我们的测试中,外壳本身也被证明是非常稳定的:正面的压力只能通过屏幕上的液晶,而手机几乎不能被扭曲。
32GB的大容量存储并不完全是慷慨的,但在这个价格范围内并不罕见。存储空间可以通过专用的microSD插槽扩展,如果需要,甚至可以同时使用两张SIM卡。在我们用参考的microSD卡Angelbird V60进行的拷贝测试中,microSD读卡器被证明是相当慢的,但在CPDT基准测试中,它在同类产品中表现良好。
日常使用中令人讨厌的是:realme C31没有NFC功能,所以不能使用非接触式支付服务。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A03s (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Realme C35 (Angelbird V60) | |
Realme C31 (Angelbird V60) | |
Motorola Moto E40 (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 无5GHz无线局域网
realme C31理论上支持WiFi 5,但没有5GHz频段,所以在我们使用参考路由器华硕GT-AXE11000的测试中,传输速率明显低于 realme C35:大约70-80MBit/s在这个级别中不是一个糟糕的速率,但它也不突出。
在移动通信方面,只有4G,而且只支持最必要的频率。因此,你应该检查你是否还能在东道国使用智能手机进行移动互联网,以便进一步旅行。在我们的简短样本中,事实证明,在接收强度方面,该智能手机在其价格范围内是相当可以的,但它不能跟上高端智能手机。
手机上的realme UI是基于Android 11,安全补丁是2022年4月的,因此在测试时是最新的。这对于这样一款廉价的手机来说是非常令人高兴的。预装的第三方应用程序被控制在一定范围内,这意味着如果你想要一个纯粹的系统,你几乎不必卸载任何东西。然而,令人讨厌的是,realme没有做任何DRM认证,所以你只能用SD观看许多大型门户网站的流媒体内容。
指纹传感器被整合到外壳右侧的待机按钮中。它可以用来直接从待机状态下解锁智能手机,但有一点延迟。在我们的测试中,手指总是被可靠地识别。如果需要,也可以通过面部识别来解锁手机。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Motorola Moto E40 | |
Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Motorola Moto E40 | |
Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Realme C35 | |
Realme C31 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Realme C35 | |
Realme C31 |
照相机--在给定的价格范围内质量正常
realme C31有一个1300万像素的主摄像头,采用索尼IMX258传感器。因此,这款智能手机在其价格范围内是一个很好的公司,即使是 摩托罗拉Moto E40其像素排列的相机名义上提供了更高的分辨率和更多的灵活性。
照片的颜色看起来有点苍白,细节也不是特别丰富。物体周围强烈的轮廓也时常可见。然而,这款智能手机可以用于快照。在弱光下,黑暗区域的细节几乎不可见,但你仍然可以识别图像内容。
该相机由一个200万像素的镜头支持,负责景深计算。还有一个微距相机,也是200万像素,用于极端特写。
用主摄像头拍摄的视频最大可以达到1080p和30fps。细节还不错,但自动对焦总是给自己一秒钟的思考时间,然后在对焦时轻微地跳动。
前面的自拍相机没有特别高的分辨率--500万像素。照片的细节看起来相当模糊,但如果你不那么仔细看,图片质量在这个价格范围内是可以的。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light显示 - 正常分辨率,无PWM
在150欧元以下的智能手机中配备高清显示屏是很常见的,但你必须要有高于60赫兹的帧率。该显示屏在同级别的产品中具有最高413cd/m²的亮度传感器,但在户外非常明亮的日子里可能还是太少。至少亮度分布是相当均匀的。
在我们用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测试中,我们注意到显示屏上有相当强烈的蓝色偏光。此外,特别是黑暗区域的颜色变化相当强烈,这取决于观察角度。我们没有检测到PWM。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 413 cd/m²
Contrast: 1033:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.395
Realme C31 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Realme C35 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy A03s PLS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto E40 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 24% | 10% | 18% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 62 ? | 50 ? 19% | 54 ? 13% | 44 ? 29% |
Response Time Black / White * | 34 ? | 24 ? 29% | 32 ? 6% | 32 ? 6% |
PWM Frequency | 807 ? | |||
Screen | 1% | -6% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 413 | 585 42% | 383 -7% | 452 9% |
Brightness | 394 | 558 42% | 354 -10% | 431 9% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 89 -2% | 88 -3% | 90 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.6 -50% | 0.34 15% | 0.46 -15% |
Contrast | 1033 | 975 -6% | 1126 9% | 983 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.89 | 4.4 10% | 5.09 -4% | 4.15 15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.35 | 8.77 -5% | 9.25 -11% | 6.47 23% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 5.9 -20% | 6.5 -33% | 4 18% |
Gamma | 2.395 92% | 2.228 99% | 2.261 97% | 2.157 102% |
CCT | 7598 86% | 8001 81% | 8152 80% | 7557 86% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 13% /
6% | 2% /
-3% | 13% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 13 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 33 ms rise | |
↘ 29 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 快速内存
与 Unisoc Tiger T612作为SoC,realme C31在同类产品中装备精良,有足够的能力满足日常使用。它并不总是能够顺利地浏览菜单--特别是当更复杂的应用程序在后台运行时。在图形密集型的应用程序中, 摩托罗拉Moto E40在图形密集型应用中略有优势,因为它可以使用其芯片中的第二个图形核心。
在网上冲浪时,你还必须忍受等待时间。尤其是大型网站上的图片,需要时不时地等待一下,直到滚动后加载完毕。
谈到存储,realme将UFS 2.2内存带入其中,从而为加载时间提供了提升,也使系统整体上更顺畅一些。我们的测试设备没有达到realme C35的巨大传输率。 realme C35,至少在我们测试的32GB版本中没有。
在满负荷的情况下,最高温度为40℃,机箱的发热完全不是问题。
背面的小扬声器做得相当差,听起来相当重的高音,有时在最大音量下听起来很不舒服。如果你想连接外部音频设备,你可以通过3.5毫米或蓝牙5.0来实现。然而,最新的aptX编解码器,如aptX Adaptive或aptX LowLatency,则无法使用。
5000毫安时的电池现在是这个级别的标准,realme C31在我们的WLAN测试中实现了类似昂贵设备的典型运行时间,约为16小时。这通常对日常使用来说是绰绰有余的,即使在密集使用期间,你也经常可以在没有电源插座的情况下管理两天的时间。然而,由于realme C31的充电功率最大只有10瓦,所以给电池充电需要一段时间。
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme C31 | |
Realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
Motorola Moto E40 | |
Average Unisoc T7225 (T612) (4.7 - 10, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme C31 | |
Realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
Motorola Moto E40 | |
Average Unisoc T7225 (T612) (5.3 - 5.6, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years) | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme C31 | |
Realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
Motorola Moto E40 | |
Average Unisoc T7225 (T612) (3 - 6.4, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=208, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme C31 | |
Realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
Motorola Moto E40 | |
Average Unisoc T7225 (T612) (1.9 - 2, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=208, last 2 years) |
Realme C31 | Realme C35 | Samsung Galaxy A03s | Motorola Moto E40 | Average 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 122% | -31% | -29% | 71% | 483% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 478.8 | 907.1 89% | 279.8 -42% | 265 -45% | 569 ? 19% | 1889 ? 295% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 131.9 | 271.1 106% | 86.8 -34% | 156.3 18% | 289 ? 119% | 1473 ? 1017% |
Random Read 4KB | 89 | 137.8 55% | 64 -28% | 56 -37% | 125.4 ? 41% | 278 ? 212% |
Random Write 4KB | 61.5 | 206.4 236% | 48.7 -21% | 30.7 -50% | 125.7 ? 104% | 312 ? 407% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Realme C31 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto E40 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Realme C31 5000 mAh | Realme C35 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A03s 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto E40 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||
WiFi Websurfing | 947 | 958 1% | 1193 26% | 995 5% | 995 ? 5% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 低价格范围内的独特功能
realme将UFS存储整合到一部部分价格低于150欧元的智能手机中,这是个小小的轰动。这种快速的存储,别致而稳定的外壳,以及良好的电池运行时间,都对整体印象产生了积极影响。
相机不能从大量的廉价手机中脱颖而出,但在类似的钱中肯定有更慢的手机。事实上,安全补丁显然是不断更新的,这在低于200欧元的价格范围内不一定常见,但对于realme C31来说仍然是这样。
一款非常便宜的手机,拥有快速的内存。
如果允许我们表达对下一代的愿望,我们会希望有NFC、DRM认证、改进的相机和90赫兹的屏幕。即便如此,realme C31在入门级类别中也是一款装备精良的手机。
如果你想用很少的钱买一个90赫兹的屏幕,你应该看看 摩托罗拉Moto E40.如果你再加几欧元,你会得到一个很好的价格,那就是 真格C35它有更快的内存,更快的WLAN,以及更明亮的屏幕。
Realme C31
- 05/05/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt