Notebookcheck Logo

小米红米 12 智能手机评测--不足 200 美元的灵活相机系统

照片范围

小米红米 12 是一款价格低廉的中端手机,具有防水功能和良好的日常性能。它的亮点之一是配备了广角镜头和微距镜头的摄像头,但这款售价不到 200 美元的手机真的能拍出出色的照片吗?
Android ARM Smartphone
小米红米 12

小米的红米系列传统上包括价格较低的手机,这些手机通常具有一些特殊功能。这家中国制造商推销的小米红米 12 具有有限的防水保护功能和灵活的摄像头。同时,这款手机的售价应该在 200 美元以下,而且还能提供相当大的存储空间。

另一方面,在这个价格范围内还有很多其他非常强劲的竞争对手,如果你决定购买这样一款廉价手机,往往不得不做出一些妥协。在这篇评测中,我们将仔细分析作为这款设备的潜在用户,你可能不得不放弃的东西。

Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Redmi 12 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G88 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.79 inch 20:9, 2460 x 1080 pixel 396 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD slot (shared, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 168.6 x 76.3
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, silicone bumper, USB cable, headset, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio, IP53-certified, fanless
Weight
198.5 g
Price
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
79 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
198.5 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.79"2460x1080
81.7 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
SD 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619
189 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
75.9 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
201 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2408x1080
78.7 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Nokia G22
T7200, Mali-G57 MP1
195 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.52"1600x720
79 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Motorola Moto G23
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
184.3 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720

小米红米 12 的背面和正面都采用了大猩猩玻璃--不过,小米并未说明是哪个版本。由于这款手机的价格较低,可以肯定的是这是一款较旧的机型,这意味着你不应该指望它能完全防摔。设计方面,红米手机看起来非常漂亮--我们的银色测试样品闪烁着许多不同的颜色,玻璃下的颗粒闪闪发光。

机身侧面采用塑料边框,有黑色、银色和浅蓝色可供选择。每个摄像头在外壳内都有自己的凹陷,这意味着摄像头模块周围没有单一的边框。

小米手机外壳通过了 IP53 认证,因此防尘性能相对较好,但只是防水而非防水。背面在压力下非常稳定,没有任何松动。正面的中等压力可穿透屏幕的液晶。小米手机几乎无法扭转,但当您尝试扭转时,它时不时会出现轻微的裂纹。

小米红米 12
小米红米 12
小米红米 12
小米红米 12
小米红米 12

尺寸比较

168.6 mm 76.3 mm 8.2 mm 198.5 g167.7 mm 78 mm 9.1 mm 201 g165.9 mm 76.2 mm 8 mm 189 g165 mm 76.2 mm 8.5 mm 195 g162.7 mm 74.7 mm 8.2 mm 184.3 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 物有所值的大量存储空间

小米红米 12 有两个存储版本:

  • 4 GB 内存 / 128 GB 存储空间:170 美元
  • 8 GB 内存 / 256 GB 存储空间:187 美元

在国际市场上,你可能还能找到配备 8 GB 内存的较小存储空间版本。

值得庆幸的是,您不必错过 NFC 功能,这意味着您还可以使用 Google Pay 等支付服务。如果你喜欢在旅途中收听广播,又不想占用数据,那么你可以使用手机内置的调频收音机。

另一个独特的功能是红米 12 的红外传感器,它可以让你把智能手机当作电视遥控器使用。

左:SIM 卡插槽
左:SIM 卡插槽
右:待机键,音量摇杆
右:待机键,音量摇杆
底部:麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
底部:麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
顶部:红外触发器、3.5 毫米音频插孔
顶部:红外触发器、3.5 毫米音频插孔

microSD 读卡器

这款手机没有指定的 microSD 插槽,因此您必须决定是使用两个 SIM 卡插槽,还是一个用于 SIM 卡,一个用于 microSD。读卡器可读取存储容量高达 1 TB 的 microSD,不过,在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行的复制测试中,读卡器的读取速度有点慢。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
50 MB/s +167%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
23.14 MB/s +24%
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
21.9 MB/s +17%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
19.6 MB/s +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
18.7 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.3 (25.7-45.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.3 (4.86-48.5)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.3 (26.7-47.7)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.6 (30.1-45.4)
Motorola Moto G23 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø38.6 (28.1-50.2)
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø68.8 (25.3-76.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø61.2 (29.9-79.8)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.3 (37-79.3)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.1 (39-81.8)
Motorola Moto G23 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø73.1 (32.5-76.9)

软件 -Android 13 ex works

红米 12 搭载的 MiUI 是一个依赖于Android 13 的界面--不过,它对系统进行了相当大的改动。喜欢纯粹的Android 的用户可能应该在购买设备前试用一下 MiUI,看看自己是否能接受所有这些改变。

预装了大量应用程序,包括第三方赞助的应用程序。有时,广告会作为系统本身的一部分显示,例如在锁屏界面或安装应用程序时。

在测试时,最新的安全补丁是 2023 年 6 月的,因此仍然是相对最新的。过去,小米甚至为其廉价手机提供至少 2 年的Android 更新,并在多年中定期发布安全补丁。

软件 小米红米 12
软件 小米红米 12
软件 小米红米 12

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 红米 12 配备精确定位功能

在我们使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 进行的 WLAN 测试中,红米 12 的 WiFi 5 和数据传输速率高达 376 MBit/s,证明了其在同价位产品中的表现与预期相符。

在靠近路由器的地方,我们可以获得完整的 WLAN 信号,网站加载速度也相对较快。在距离路由器 10 米远,中间有 3 面墙的情况下,我们开始注意到 WLAN 性能有所下降,网站加载一般需要相当长的时间。

遗憾的是,这款红米 12 不支持 5G。在欧洲以外的国家,你可以找到支持 5G 的版本,即 红米 12 5G.虽然这款手机并不是一款全球通用的手机,但它支持所有必要的 4G 频率。在我们为期两周的测试阶段,接收效果总的来说一般,但在市内地区从未完全失去过信号。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=185, last 2 years)
713 MBit/s +125%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
347 (336min - 351max) MBit/s +9%
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
346 (322min - 350max) MBit/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 (68min - 354max) MBit/s +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
317 (284min - 330max) MBit/s
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
315 (226min - 328max) MBit/s -1%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=187, last 2 years)
730 MBit/s +99%
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
370 (339min - 379max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
367 (341min - 376max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
365 (331min - 379max) MBit/s -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
363 (349min - 374max) MBit/s -1%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
362 (319min - 378max) MBit/s -1%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 12; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø316 (284-330)
Xiaomi Redmi 12; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (341-376)
户外 GPS 测试
户外 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

红米 12 支持所有用于定位的大型卫星网络,当我们在户外时,它的连接速度非常快。在这里,你可以期望在 2 米内定位。它甚至还支持 SBAS,这有助于手机更精确地定位。

让我们来看看红米 12 在实际使用中的定位服务表现如何:为此,我们骑上自行车,带上 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表作为对比,因为它的定位服务非常精确。

只要街道宽敞,房屋低矮,红米 12 就能轻松记录你的路线。在狭窄的城市小巷中,它就不那么精确了,但也不差。因此,我们推荐将红米 12 用于导航。

红米 12 定位服务 - 概述
红米 12 定位服务 - 概述
红米 12 定位服务--转折点
红米 12 定位服务--转折点
红米 12 定位服务 - 桥接
红米 12 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接

电话功能和通话质量 - 通话清晰

尽管系统发生了很大的变化,但这款手机仍然依靠谷歌的标准电话应用程序来拨打电话。

我们喜欢将手机放在耳边时的通话质量--如果需要的话,你可以清楚、大声地听懂对方在说什么。我们的声音传输得很好。在使用扬声器时,我们的通话也很清晰,不过必须确保说话的声音足够大。

相机 - 灵活且具有同类产品的品质

使用前置摄像头拍摄的图像
使用前置摄像头拍摄的图像

广角镜头并不总是廉价中端设备的标配,然而小米红米 12 除此以外还配备了微距摄像头。不过,系统不会自动切换到这些功能,你必须选择微距模式才能使用这个镜头。用它拍摄的图像质量很低,广角摄像头拍摄的图像也很暗,细节层次很低。广角镜头和主镜头之间有一个混合变焦功能。

5000 万像素的主摄像头采用三星 Isocell JN1 传感器,这种传感器通常在廉价智能手机中可以找到。小米小米Redmi Note 12 5G例如,小米手机(Xiaomi 12 5G)也采用了这种主摄像头传感器,总的来说,其摄像头设置非常相似。

在我们的测试设备上拍摄的照片显得有点缺乏生气,在暗处和黑处没有显示出太多的动态。所幸的是,照片的清晰度和细节都相当不错。即使在光线不足的情况下,手机也能拍出不错的照片,而在完全黑暗的环境中,你仍能辨认出一些细节。

录制视频的最高像素为 500 万,速度为 30 fps。自动对焦可能有点慢,但不会抽风,其光线调节功能也很好用。

前置摄像头的分辨率为 500 万像素,乍一看,自拍效果不错,在较暗的地方也能显示一两个细节。如果放大图像,它们很快就会变得颗粒感很强。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera flowerMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightWide-angle
orginal image
click to load images

在光线充足的实验室中,主摄像头只能以中等的细节锐度描绘拍摄对象,但对比度水平良好。只有在照明强度仅为 1 勒克斯的情况下,才能猜测图像内容。

ColorChecker
8.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 12: 7.46 ∆E min: 2.79 - max: 13.77 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.8 ∆E
53.2 ∆E
38 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
53.1 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
65 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
47.5 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
75.9 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
87 ∆E
69.9 ∆E
51.2 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 12: 45.64 ∆E min: 13.52 - max: 86.95 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不含电源

红米 12 不附带电源。包装中包括一个硅胶保护套和一个耳机。

这款手机目前不在小米公司的国际保修服务范围内。的国际保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 精确的指纹传感器

手机的 90-Hz 屏幕可在 36 Hz/48 Hz/60 Hz/90 Hz 四个级别之间自动调节刷新率。这让手机在描绘静态图像时更省电,同时其刷新率也足以提供流畅的操作和快速的反应速度。红米 12 的触摸屏反应灵敏,边边角角都很敏感。

小米在手机右侧的待机键内隐藏了一个指纹传感器。它几乎可以立即解锁手机,而且非常可靠。你也可以使用面部解锁设备,但它只能扫描二维图像,这意味着它有点容易被操控。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
键盘景观
键盘景观

显示屏 - 高分辨率,中等亮度

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

这款手机的 IPS 屏幕分辨率高达 2,460 x 1,080 像素--在这个价位的手机中,720p 分辨率的手机并不少见。遗憾的是,红米 12 的亮度稍有不足,尤其是与同价位的Redmi Note 12 5G.

略微提高的黑色值也导致对比度较差。值得庆幸的是,显示屏没有出现 PWM 闪烁的迹象,但反过来,它的反应速度也只能算中等。

429
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 449 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 437.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 449 cd/m²
Contrast: 898:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.254
Xiaomi Redmi 12
IPS, 2460x1080, 6.8"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Nokia G22
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Motorola Moto G23
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Screen
39%
-91%
-2%
-22%
Brightness middle
449
658
47%
465
4%
674
50%
522
16%
Brightness
437
663
52%
439
0%
641
47%
502
15%
Brightness Distribution
95
98
3%
89
-6%
90
-5%
91
-4%
Black Level *
0.5
0.47
6%
0.43
14%
0.47
6%
Contrast
898
989
10%
1567
74%
1111
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.29
1.4
39%
8.5
-271%
4.45
-94%
4.63
-102%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.49
2.7
40%
15.8
-252%
7.41
-65%
8.59
-91%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
1.7
54%
11.8
-219%
5.1
-38%
5.2
-41%
Gamma
2.254 98%
2.23 99%
2.2 100%
2.072 106%
2.296 96%
CCT
6198 105%
6504 100%
10757 60%
7799 83%
7832 83%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行测量时,我们发现在描绘白色色调时,黄色色调极少,这也是屏幕与参考色彩空间偏差最大的地方。一般来说,色彩描绘得非常好,色彩配置文件 "标准 "似乎是最准确的。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 AdobeRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 AdobeRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 DCI P3
CalMAN 色彩空间 DCI P3
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.9 ms rise
↘ 7.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.7 ms rise
↘ 15.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在室外,屏幕亮度在阴天也能满足手机阅读的需要,但在阳光直射的情况下,这就有点困难了。

由于采用了 IPS 技术,因此各个方向的可视角度都很宽。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 足够日常使用

安装的联发科 Helio G88是廉价中端手机的典型 SoC。在我们的对比测试中,该设备在大多数基准测试中都表现出色,只有在Redmi Note 12 5G.

在日常使用中,你无法完全避免掉帧现象,但在操纵系统时,掉帧现象并不经常发生。更复杂的应用程序很快就会让手机不堪重负。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +165%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
642 Points +71%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
375 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (284 - 378, n=6)
357 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
354 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
350 Points -7%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
310 Points -17%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +158%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
1954 Points +52%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1363 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1334 Points +4%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1318 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1132 - 1475, n=6)
1316 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1284 Points
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=162, last 2 years)
1454 Points +235%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (432 - 442, n=5)
436 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
434 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
413 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=162, last 2 years)
4049 Points +231%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1384 Points +13%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1217 - 1436, n=5)
1311 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1223 Points
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points +193%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
272388 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (259233 - 272388, n=2)
265811 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years)
12972 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9290 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (6789 - 9802, n=6)
8764 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
8215 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
7953 Points -14%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6637 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5720 Points -38%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=158, last 2 years)
885 Points +175%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
539 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
348 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (322 - 326, n=2)
324 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
322 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6326 Points +164%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
3337 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2396 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2247 - 2396, n=3)
2325 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2226 Points -7%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10181 Points +128%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
6437 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5104 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4465 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (4065 - 4695, n=3)
4408 Points -1%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6785 Points +102%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
4065 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3358 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2858 - 3358, n=3)
3140 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2650 Points -21%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
17165 Points +778%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
4001 Points +105%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1954 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1878 - 1960, n=3)
1931 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1811 Points -7%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1566 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
1184 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1125 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1042 - 1125, n=3)
1096 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1002 Points -11%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points +400%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
5395 Points +60%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (3367 - 5025, n=3)
4022 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3630 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3367 Points

在图形基准测试中,这款手机在同价位手机中也表现出色。不过,很快我们就会发现,该 SoC 更适合 720p 屏幕,因为在屏幕测试中,我们对比领域中的相应手机表现要好得多。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points -5%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
112 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
189 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
189 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points -5%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
114 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
749 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
749 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
716 Points -4%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
413 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
748 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
736 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
706 Points -4%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
408 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2677 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2440 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2410 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2150 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2347 Points +86%
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1299 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1260 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1139 Points -10%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2413 Points +74%
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1450 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1388 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1290 Points -7%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3231 Points +29%
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2790 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2694 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2502 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2590 Points +120%
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1263 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1178 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1177 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2709 Points +103%
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1438 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1346 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1334 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +45%
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
54 fps +35%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps -7%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps -17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
85 fps +85%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
46 fps
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
43 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -11%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps +83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps +57%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -4%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps +65%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps -12%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
30 fps +114%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +79%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -7%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps +94%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -6%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.7 fps -46%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +97%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.3 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +70%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9 fps -10%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.2 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps +134%
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps +60%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.4 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
4.7 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.1 fps +109%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.4 fps
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps -6%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2 fps -41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +118%
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +41%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps -4%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +111%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.5 fps
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.8 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps -11%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps -42%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.1 fps +107%
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.5 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps -7%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
0.85 fps -43%

红米 12 的上网速度并不是最好的:网页加载往往需要等待一段时间。即使性能超过 1GB,图片加载也需要时间。这个价位的其他设备通常速度更快一些。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +328%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
58.044 Points +107%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
40.02 Points +42%
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (28.1 - 35.9, n=3)
30.9 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Chrome 115)
28.105 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=147, last 2 years)
136.5 runs/min +563%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
48.5 runs/min +135%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
32 runs/min +55%
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (20.6 - 27.5, n=3)
24.2 runs/min +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Chrome 115)
20.6 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points +267%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
68 Points +119%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
44 Points +42%
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (31 - 38, n=2)
34.5 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Chrome 115)
31 Points
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +246%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
91 Points +112%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
60 Points +40%
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (43 - 53, n=3)
48 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Chrome 115)
43 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +388%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
19867 Points +161%
Motorola Moto G23 (Chrome 111)
13252 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
11782 Points +55%
Nokia G22 (Chrome 112)
10858 Points +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (7611 - 13413, n=6)
9991 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Chrome 115)
7611 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Chrome 115)
5572.6 ms *
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (3706 - 5573, n=3)
4567 ms * +18%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
3347 ms * +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
2117.2 ms * +62%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +72%

* ... smaller is better

小米红米 12 的 eMMC 闪存有点慢。虽然在这个价位内还可以接受,但也有一些手机的闪存速度更快,可以更快地传输文件和打开应用程序,例如Redmi Note 12 5G诺基亚 G22.

Xiaomi Redmi 12Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5GSamsung Galaxy A14 LTENokia G22Motorola Moto G23Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
75%
-28%
83%
-3%
-22%
335%
Sequential Read 256KB
300
520.09
73%
298.69
0%
881
194%
282.4
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB
272.5
505.55
86%
200.17
-27%
367
35%
244.6
-10%
194.6 ?(72.3 - 314, n=76)
-29%
Random Read 4KB
84.8
170.61
101%
55.9
-34%
131
54%
100.2
18%
Random Write 4KB
115
161.26
40%
55.86
-51%
172
50%
100.5
-13%

游戏 - 大部分为 30 fps

玩游戏时,您真的不应该选择超过 30 帧的速度。当然,有些游戏可以达到 60 帧/秒,但在《PUBG Mobile》等更复杂的游戏中,即使在低细节设置下,也无法获得更多帧数。

我们在玩《 暗黑破坏神:不朽》时,也无法在最低分辨率设置下获得高于 30 帧的帧数。此外,我们还发现了一个图形错误,导致游戏无法进行。我们使用GameBench 测试了帧速率。.

使用触摸屏和位置传感器控制游戏时运行稳定。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
暗黑破坏神:不朽
暗黑破坏神:不朽
05101520253035Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 12; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.7.0: Ø36 (25-40)
Xiaomi Redmi 12; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.7.0: Ø28.5 (21-31)
Xiaomi Redmi 12; Diablo Immortal; 2.0.2: Ø29.5 (24-32)

排放 - 红米 12 的温度并不高

温度

我们测得的最高机箱温度为 44.1 °C。虽然可以感觉到,但还不是很严重。这并不影响设备的运行速度--即使在运行了 20 次复杂的基准测试后,手机仍能保持 96% 的原有性能。

Max. Load
 43.9 °C36.9 °C32.6 °C 
 44 °C37.3 °C33 °C 
 43.4 °C37.9 °C32.8 °C 
Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 38 °C
31.9 °C36.4 °C42.9 °C
32.7 °C36.5 °C43.5 °C
32.7 °C36.9 °C44.1 °C
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 37.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G23
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 % +3%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
96.8 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.4 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.4 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
95.9 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98 %
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
95.6 % -2%
00.20.50.70.91.11.41.61.822.32.52.72.93.23.43.63.94.14.3Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.137 (1.123-1.147)
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.49 (4.33-4.52)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.29 (4.15-4.31)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.5 (2.44-2.52)
Motorola Moto G23 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.52 (4.47-4.53)
正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回

发言人

设备底部角落的小型扬声器可以很好地完成任务--声音相对清晰,高音也不夸张。当然,你绝不能指望它能提供什么高保真系统,但偶尔看一些视频或听一些音乐绝对足够了。

手机有一个 3.5 毫米插孔和蓝牙,可以用来连接外部音频设备。手机支持多种编解码器:除了 SBC 和 AAC,它还支持所有重要的 aptX 编解码器、LDAC 和 LHDC(最高版本 5)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.137.92537.538.43131.4314033.330.95032.133.16326.126.38020.219.310016.117.512514.922.81601330.32009.532.925010.538.231511.944.64008.150.950095763010.260.880013.962.5100012.264.7125011.868.1160011.465.8200010.671.4250011.371.831501269.7400012.764.2500013.467.2630014.161.9800014.862.91000015.763.21250016.468.51600017.356.4SPL24.979.4N0.641.2median 12.2median 62.5Delta1.911.438.638.537.136.92827.832.934.731.836.22630.622.922.421.12523.729.718.234.313.334.814.543.312.849.611.45211.755.310.961.615.264.912.266.612.868.210.967.410.966.711.664.71257.512.965.313.669.314.367.915.16615.761.816.566.717.458.425.477.90.740.2median 13.3median 61.82.39.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 12Motorola Moto G23
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 12 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G23 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 良好的续航能力

耗电量

红米 12 在低负载和极低负载下似乎相当省电,但在高负载下,有时会耗费大量电能。

为了给设备充电,我们安装了一个功率高达 18 瓦的充电系统。虽然手机没有配备充电器,但我们使用了几款不同手机的充电器,它们都能被小米红米 12 识别,使手机能够快速充电。完全充满电最多需要 2:15 小时。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.2 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 4.2 / 8.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 12
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G88
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-6%
-22%
-2%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.99
1%
0.89
11%
0.765 ?(0.53 - 1, n=2)
23%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.98
-65%
2.31
-93%
1.605 ?(1.2 - 2.01, n=2)
-34%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
2.02
-35%
2.34
-56%
1.76 ?(1.5 - 2.02, n=2)
-17%
Load Average *
4.2
3.35
20%
4.11
2%
Load Maximum *
8.9
4.72
47%
6.46
27%
7.33 ?(5.76 - 8.9, n=2)
18%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 12; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.46 (3.37-8.96)
Xiaomi Redmi 12; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.206 (1.035-1.437)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 12; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.31 (6.23-7.77)
Xiaomi Redmi 12; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.206 (1.035-1.437)

运行时间

在我们的 WLAN 测试中,小米红米 12 的表现相当不错,平均续航时间为 13:23 小时。你绝对可以用这款设备应付一整天的工作,但肯定还有其他一些同价位的手机可以实现更长的运行时间。其他使用场景(如观看视频或高负载)也显示出了良好的效果,这意味着红米手机在运行时间方面取得了不错的总成绩。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
23h 45min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 22min
Xiaomi Redmi 12
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
5000 mAh
Nokia G22
5050 mAh
Motorola Moto G23
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
-5%
31%
43%
Reader / Idle
1425
1668
17%
1170
-18%
H.264
1086
1065
-2%
1044
-4%
WiFi v1.3
803
645
-20%
896
12%
1052
31%
1152
43%
Load
382
388
2%
348
-9%

Pros

+ 灵活的摄像系统
+ 非常精确的定位
+ 红外热像仪和调频收音机
+ 流线型设计
+ 多种蓝牙编解码器

Cons

- 手机不带电源适配器
- 预装大量臃肿软件
- 系统包含广告
- 内存慢

评语--有吸引力,价格便宜,有亮点

小米红米 12 评测。
小米红米 12 评测。

小米红米 12 外观漂亮,存储空间大。一些积极的方面值得一提,如红外爆破器和调频收音机接收功能。它还配备了必要的耳机,可以代替天线使用。这款价格低廉的中档手机还具有良好的运行时间和非常精确的定位功能。

摄像头配备了三个不错的镜头,使其非常灵活,就价格而言,确实还不错。它的屏幕可以再亮一些,但总的来说,它能很好地描绘色彩。如果你喜欢听音乐,这款手机配备了不错的扬声器、多种蓝牙编解码器和 3.5 毫米插孔。

我们发现小米手机预装的所有软件都有点令人讨厌。更令人遗憾的是,这款手机还应该长期定期接受操作系统更新。这款智能手机没有配备充电器,但这应该不是什么大问题,因为该设备兼容所有常见的充电器。

小米红米 12 是一款极具吸引力且价格低廉的智能手机,它可能不包含 5G,但可以提供大量存储空间和精确定位。

这款手机的主要竞争对手之一其实来自同一家制造商:小米小米Redmi Note 12 5G提供更快的内存、更好的性能和 5G。只是在外观上稍逊一筹。如果您想花更少的钱,那么不妨看看诺基亚 G22.

价格和供应情况

小米红米 12 在亚马逊上有售。128 GB 存储空间和 4 GB 内存版本的手机售价为165.83 美元

配备 256 GB 存储空间和 8 GB 内存的版本目前售价为187 美元

Xiaomi Redmi 12 - 08/06/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
88%
Games Performance
16 / 64 → 24%
Application Performance
62 / 86 → 72%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
63%
Average
74%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米红米 12 智能手机评测--不足 200 美元的灵活相机系统
Florian Schmitt, 2023-08- 8 (Update: 2024-08-15)