Notebookcheck Logo
(Bildquelle: Daniel Schmidt)

小米 15 Ultra 评测--搭载徕卡的动力之王

智能手机领域的重量级竞争者

小米 15 Ultra 的目标是成为智能手机摄像头的巅峰之作，它继续与徕卡合作，配备了两个新的传感器，将其主设置提升到 350 MP。它能实现其雄心勃勃的目标吗？它还能提供什么？我们的评测为您解答。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

结论：小米证明了自己的实力

小米 15 Ultra 提供了旗舰智能手机所能提供的一切：顶级的性能、时尚的设计、明亮的显示屏、超长的电池续航时间和强大的摄像头配置。此外，它还拥有 IP 认证、现代连接选项和快速充电技术。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

尽管如此，小米 15 Ultra 也有一些不足之处。小米 15 Ultra 不支持 UWB，其 SoC 在持续负载下会出现节流。小米还可以在软件更新方面更加慷慨--即使是三星的中端设备也能更好地处理这个问题。

尽管超广角镜头的像素略有下降，但它的摄像头仍是智能手机中最出色的配置之一，没有真正的技术弱点。尽管如此，小米和徕卡在色彩调校方面采取了独特的方法，这可能不会吸引所有人。

Pros

+ 明亮准确的 LTPO AMOLED 显示屏
+ 支持快速充电
+ 出色的摄像头设置
+ 通过 IP68 认证
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 电池容量小于国产机型
- 不支持 UWB
- 在持续负载下性能会下降

价格和供应情况

在进行测试的德国，小米 15 Ultra 可以直接从制造商的商店购买，并且作为早鸟优惠活动（截止到 2025 年 3 月 31 日）的一部分，价格更低，还可以免费获得额外配件。此外，在亚马逊（Amazon.de）和德国媒体市场（MediaMarkt.de）等零售商处也有销售，售价为 1,499,90 欧元。

Amazon Logo
$7.99
Aiziki 2 Pack for Xiaomi 15 pro 5G/ Xiaomi 15 ultra Screen protector, 3D full Coverage Tempered Glass, Ultra Resistant, Hatterproof, Scratch-Resistant, Bubble Free for Xiaomi 15 Pro Tempered Glass, Case Friendly
  • $7.59
    Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible with Xiaomi 15 Pro/Xiaomi 15 Ultra Screen Protector, 3D Full Coverage 9H Tempered Glass Film, HD Clear Scratch Resistant, Bubble-Free
  • $5.52
    KJYFOANI for Xiaomi 15 Ultra Screen Protector Tempered Galss, [1 Pack] High Clear [9H Hardness] [Bubble Free] Screen Tempered Glass Protective Film for Xiaomi 15 Ultra 6.73 Inch.

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
89.5%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $7.99
Aiziki 2 Pack for Xiaomi 15 ...
2. $7.59
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ...
3. $5.52
KJYFOANI for Xiaomi 15 Ultra...
List Price: 1499€		229 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.73"
3200x1440
521 PPI
AMOLED
2.
89.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $9.36
AACL 3-Pack for Samsung Gala...
2. $7.98
Ailun Glass Screen Protector...
3. $16.82
Ferilinso [Auto Dust Install...
List Price: 1449€		218 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"
3120x1440
498 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
3.
88.6%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro ⎘
Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe		Amazon:
1. $37.99
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Clea...
2. $8.98
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
3. $6.98
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
List Price: 1449€		227 g256 GB NVMe6.90"
2868x1320
458 PPI
Super Retina XDR OLED
4.
89.2%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $14.99
Vaxson Privacy Screen Protec...
2. $11.99
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
3. $12.68
Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
List Price: 1300€		223 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"
2800x1280
453 PPI
OLED
5.
87.3%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. 
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
2. $12.99
Vaxson 3-Pack Anti Blue Ligh...
3. $6.57
[1-Pack] for Oppo Find X8 Pr...
List Price: 1199€		215 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2780x1264
450 PPI
AMOLED

继14 Ultra 之后，小米 15 Ultra 也将于今年在中国发布后不久在全球上市。不过，它也有一个小缺点：与中国机型的 6000 毫安时电池相比，全球版本的电池容量较小。

小米还为其旗舰智能手机配备了比上一代更快的 SoC、更亮的显示屏和更大的电池。Ultra 还是首款正式支持蓝牙 6.0 和 UFS 4.1 的智能手机。

在德国，小米 15 Ultra 有两个存储版本：512 GB 和 1 TB，售价分别为 1500 欧元和 1700 欧元。

规格小米 15 Ultra

Xiaomi 15 Ultra (15 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 830, Core: 1100 MHz
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.73 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 521 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, TCL M9, AMOLED, wet touch technology, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, Xiaomi shield glass 2.0, 300 Hz touch sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 477.9 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Barometer, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.35 x 161.3 x 75.3
Battery
5410 mAh Lithium-Ion, Supports: QC3+, QC3.0, QC2.0, PD3.0, PD2.0; 18 W Reverse-Charging, Silicon-Carbon-Anode
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (LYT-900, f/1.63, 23 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (3x Tele-Macro, IMX858, f/1.8, 70 mm, OIS) + 200 MPix (4.3x Tele, HP9, f/2.6, 100 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (Ultra Wide / Macro, JN5, f/2.2, 14 mm); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (OV32B, f/2.0, 21 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-Cabel, SIM-Tool, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V5 | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid | DRM Widevine L1 | Dual-eSIM | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 490.4 MB/s (connected to Samsung 980 Pro in an Asus ROG Strix Arion Case (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: 0.998 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.997 W/kg | max. charging speed: 90 W (wired) / 80 W (wireless), fanless, waterproof
Weight
229 g
Price
1499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳：小米 15 Ultra 通过 IP68 认证

小米 15 Ultra 有黑色、白色和银色铬合金三种颜色（我们的测试机为银色铬合金）。它的厚度和重量略高于其 p前代但依然保持了良好的平衡，尽管摄像头模块很大，但并没有头重脚轻的感觉。小米公司称其厚度为 9.35 毫米，但我们的测量结果显示其厚度为 9.7 毫米，加上摄像头，厚度增加到 15.6 毫米。

背面由玻璃纤维和 PU 皮革制成，确保了材料的高耐用性。边框是铝制的，正面则采用了小米自制的盾形玻璃 2.0，据说抗摔性提高了 16 倍。制造质量非常出色--这款智能手机给人一种高级感，接缝严密均匀。唯一的小缺点是在扭动设备时会有轻微的吱吱声。

小米智能手机通过了 IP68 认证，具有防尘和防水功能。SIM 卡托盖由铝制成，而卡托本身则由塑料制成。

(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
162.7 mm 77.1 mm 8.8 mm 223 g163 mm 77.6 mm 8.25 mm 227 g162.8 mm 77.6 mm 8.2 mm 218 g161.3 mm 75.3 mm 9.35 mm 229 g161.4 mm 75.3 mm 9.2 mm 219.8 g162.3 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 215 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能和连接性小米蓝牙 6.0

乍一看，小米 15 Ultra 与它的 p前代但这款专注于摄影的智能手机引入了一些竞争对手尚未采用的创新技术。除了 UFS 4.1 存储系统外，它还采用了蓝牙 6.0 技术，该技术提高了能效，增强了安全性，提高了数据传输效率，减少了延迟。新标准还支持精确的距离测量（信道探测），能更准确地跟踪蓝牙设备的距离，从而有可能减少对 UWB 的需求。说到这里，小米再次选择放弃 UWB 支持。

USB 3.2 端口速度高达 10 Gbit/s，支持有线视频输出。在我们的拷贝测试中，该接口的速度达到了 490.40 MB/s，尽管该标准有可能实现更高的性能。该设备还包括 NFC 和红外触发器。

顶部边缘（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
顶部边缘
左侧（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
左侧
右侧：音量按钮和电源按钮（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
右侧音量按钮和电源按钮
底部边缘：扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风和 SIM 卡托盘（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
底部边缘扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风和 SIM 卡托盘

软件：内置人工智能功能，并提供六年的更新支持

小米 15 Ultra 运行谷歌Android 15 和 HyperOS 2.0。该操作系统承诺四年更新一次，安全补丁可延长两年。

这款智能手机还拥有小米 HyperAI 旗下的一系列人工智能功能。这些功能包括双子座、Circle to Search、动态壁纸创建、AI 翻译等。它还提供大量基于人工智能的照片编辑工具。

不足之处是，小米手机预装了多个第三方应用程序，不过都可以卸载。

可持续性

小米 15 Ultra 的包装几乎完全不使用塑料。不过，该公司只提供了有关使用可回收材料的模糊信息，也没有披露二氧化碳排放量。

小米不提供用户维修手册或备件。

连接性和全球导航卫星系统：Wi-Fi 7 和精确定位

小米 15 Ultra 支持包括 5G Sub-6 在内的所有现代移动标准，但不支持 5G mmWave。由于支持多个频段，它应该能够在全球范围内建立数据连接。在城市地区接收质量稳定。

由于采用了 IEEE 802.11be，小米 15 Ultra 可以在所有三个频段上提供 Wi-Fi 7 的全部带宽。在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000（亚马逊链接）作为参考路由器进行的测试中，传输速度既快又稳定。

Networking
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
984 (min: 960) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
840 (min: 800) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1565 (min: 1348) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1620 (min: 1545) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼92%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
887 (min: 567) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
762 (min: 726) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1418 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1258 (min: 1190) MBit/s ∼78%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
981 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
829 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1884 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1569 (min: 1486) MBit/s ∼97%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
563 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼30%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1610 (min: 1480) MBit/s ∼99%
Average Wi-Fi 7
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1020 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1002 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1544 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1517 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
720 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
702 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1437 (min: 521) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1367 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼84%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1566 (1348-1604)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1720 (798-1853)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1618 (1545-1651)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1289-1530)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø984 (960-1005)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1806 (1767-1846)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø839 (800-859)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1468 (744-1523)
GPS 测试：户外
户外活动
GPS 测试：室内
室内

小米 15 Ultra 在室外能快速实现卫星定位，即使在室内，它也能保持高精度，同时迅速建立连接。

在一次散步中，我们将小米智能手机与Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表进行了比较。虽然这两款设备都没有出错，但 15 Ultra 能更精确地跟踪行走的距离。

GNSS 测试：路线
GNSS 测试：路线
全球导航卫星系统测试：池塘环航
全球导航卫星系统测试：池塘环航
全球导航卫星系统测试：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试：总结

电话功能和通话质量

小米 15 Ultra 支持 VoLTE、Wi-Fi 通话和双卡功能。它可以容纳两个 nano-SIM、两个 eSIM 或两者的组合。

将智能手机放在耳边时，双方都能听到自然的语音质量。降噪功能在大多数情况下都表现出色，不过偶尔也会有非常响亮的背景噪声穿透手机，使 15 Ultra 用户的声音变得低沉。免提模式令人印象深刻，不过在较远的距离上，小米用户的声音听起来会略显尖锐。

摄像头小米放弃可变光圈

与小米 15 Ultra 自拍（纵向模式）
自拍（纵向模式）

小米 15 Ultra 的前置摄像头基本保持不变。尽管没有自动对焦和像素分级功能，但它仍能捕捉迷人的自拍照，并支持高达 60 fps 的超高清视频录制。

然而，真正的明星在背面：采用徕卡 Summilux 镜头的四摄像头设置，由 1 英寸索尼传感器支撑。小米取消了可变光圈，取而代之的是一个 8P 非球面高透光率镜头，并通过双重防反射涂层进行了增强。用户可以选择三种标准焦距：23 毫米、28 毫米和 35 毫米。结果令人印象深刻，小米 15 Ultra 在所有光线条件下都能提供智能手机所能达到的良好到出色的图像质量。

一个小缺点是实时取景预览并不总是与最终图像效果相匹配，特别是在弱光环境下，实际照片往往要亮得多。

一个显著的变化是新的超广角传感器，它实际上比前一代的 14 超.虽然图像质量不错，但边缘略显柔和。该镜头还可用作微距镜头，对焦距离最远可达 2.5 厘米。

变焦由两个专用镜头完成。3 倍变焦（包括 10 厘米的远摄模式）沿用了上一代机型，但新增加了一个大型三星 HP9 传感器，可在 200 MP 下实现 4.3 倍变焦。即使是放大 10 倍以上的数码变焦，这一设置也能带来出色的效果。超过 20 倍数码变焦时，额外的光学取景器会启动，该设备支持高达 120 倍的数码变焦。

一个小缺点是长焦距下的防抖功能。虽然小米 15 Ultra 具有光学（OIS）和电子（EIS）防抖功能，但实时取景有时会突然抖动。此外，当智能手机晃动时，防抖机制会产生明显的嘎嘎声。

23 毫米
23 毫米
3 倍光学变焦（70 毫米）
70 毫米
4.3 倍光学变焦（100 毫米）
100 毫米
10 倍数码变焦（233 毫米）
233 毫米
60 倍数字变焦（1400 毫米）
1400 毫米
120 倍数字变焦（2791 毫米）
2791 毫米
宏观
宏观

小米 15 Ultra 可录制各种分辨率的视频，从 720p 到 8K。不过，8K 的帧率仅限于 30 帧/秒，并且适用于所有镜头，但在录制过程中不能切换镜头。在超高清格式下，帧率最高可达 120 帧/秒，如果您坚持使用 60 帧/秒，还可以使用杜比视界进行录制。遗憾的是，它不支持 PAL 帧率。拍摄效果令人印象深刻，防抖效果也很好。在音频方面，降噪功能表现可靠，但会稍微改变说话的声音。这种效果的强度视情况而定。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light

在可控光照条件下，小米 15 Ultra 可以捕捉到测试图表的大量细节，甚至是边缘部分。纸张表面的纹理保持得很好。

通过 ColorChecker，大多数颜色都能准确再现，而且没有过度增亮。不过，少数色调的 DeltaE 值超过了 10，略高于理想值。

ColorChecker
3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 15 Ultra: 5.41 ∆E min: 2.42 - max: 11.22 ∆E
ColorChecker
9.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 15 Ultra: 8.59 ∆E min: 3.34 - max: 16.21 ∆E

配件和保修：可选摄影套件

小米 15 Ultra 随附的配件极少：一根 USB 数据线、一个 SIM 卡工具和一个透明塑料盒。

小米网店提供兼容的电源适配器。摄影套件也回来了，通过一个保护套和一个手柄附件扩展了 Ultra 的功能。保护套可选择安装 67 毫米滤镜，手柄包括一条背带、内置 2,000 毫安时电池和可配置的控制按钮。该套件还新增了一个可拆卸的拇指托，使单手握持智能手机时不会触碰到触摸屏。不过，该套件的售价为 200 欧元（建议零售价），并不完全符合预算要求。

小米只为其智能手机提供 12 个月的保修服务，这与

零售商的法定保修服务是分开的。.该设备也可以通过Xiaomi Care 投保。提供两年的保修服务，价格为 159 欧元。

小米 15 Ultra 摄影套件（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
小米 15 Ultra 摄影套件（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
小米 15 Ultra 摄影套件（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）

输入设备和控制装置：小米 15 Ultra 具有更高的触摸采样率

小米将电容式触摸屏的采样率略微提高到了 300 Hz，从而实现了更快更精确的输入。超声波屏内指纹传感器快速可靠。

线性振动电机可提供清晰的触觉反馈。如果感觉过于强烈，可以在设置中降低强度，因为默认设置为最大值。

其他功能包括非触摸手势控制、单手模式和手势快捷键。手势快捷方式允许你使用轻拍设备背面作为输入方法，并可选择双击或三击。不过，自定义选项非常有限，而且主要与中文应用程序相关。

 

显示屏：精确的 LTPO-AMOLED 显示屏，亮度超过 3,600 cd/m²

子像素结构
子像素结构

从纸面上看，显示屏与前代产品相比变化不大：面板尺寸为 6.73 英寸，分辨率为可选的 1440p。由于集成了 LTPO 技术，刷新率可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节，并支持所有 HDR 标准。

在测试 14 Ultra的测试中，小米宣称的峰值亮度只有在播放 HDR 内容时才能达到，但现在不同了。在全屏白色显示的情况下，亮度超过了 1,000 cd/m²，而在较小的白色区域（APL18），我们测得的亮度高达 3,438 cd/m²，在 HDR 播放时为 3,630 cd/m²。这两项数据都明显高于小米的标称规格（3,200 cd/m²）。在手动亮度调节方面，用户可以调节到 617 cd/m²。

通过示波器，我们测得基本闪烁率为 120 Hz。不过，小米还额外实现了 1920 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光。在最低显示亮度下，我们记录到的频率为 1,923 Hz。再加上平缓的振幅，这款 OLED 显示屏对眼睛比较友好，不太可能产生不适感。

1045
cd/m²		1044
cd/m²		1074
cd/m²
1053
cd/m²		1041
cd/m²		1083
cd/m²
1047
cd/m²		1055
cd/m²		1089
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
TCL M9 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1089 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1059 cd/m² Minimum: 1.97 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1041 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"		Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"		Honor Magic7 Pro
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"		Oppo Find X8 Pro
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"		Xiaomi 14 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
-41%
-25%
27%
17%
-14%
Brightness middle
1041
1357
30%
1055
1%
1607
54%
1167
12%
997
-4%
Brightness
1059
1350
27%
1061
0%
1609
52%
1160
10%
1002
-5%
Brightness Distribution
96
94
-2%
93
-3%
95
-1%
98
2%
96
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
3.1
-210%
1.5
-50%
0.9
10%
0.87
13%
1.6
-60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
4.7
-74%
4.7
-74%
1.8
33%
1.64
39%
3.3
-22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
2.2
-16%
2.3
-21%
1.7
11%
1.4
26%
1.8
5%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2 110%
2.21 100%
2.24 98%
2.311 95%
2.19 100%
CCT
6697 97%
6391 102%
6625 98%
6346 102%
6426 101%
6493 100%

* ... smaller is better

Display: HDR Peak Brightness | APL18 Peak Brightness
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic7 Pro
4697 cd/m² +29%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
3630 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
2768 cd/m² -24%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
2600 cd/m² -28%
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
3438 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
2613 cd/m² -24%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
2357 cd/m² -31%
Honor Magic7 Pro
1634 cd/m² -52%

Legend

 
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Qualcomm Adreno 830, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 830, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro, Apple A18 Pro GPU, 256 GB NVMe
 
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Qualcomm Adreno 830, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 14.56 %
Secondary Frequency: 1923 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8584 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
最低显示亮度
25% 显示屏亮度
25% 显示屏亮度
50% 显示亮度
50% 显示亮度
75% 显示亮度
75% 显示亮度
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列。(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

我们使用卡尔曼和光度计来评估面板的色彩准确度。只要配置正确，小米 15 Ultra 在这项测试中的表现非常出色（详情请参考截图说明）。在出厂设置中，白平衡略微偏冷。

灰度（色彩方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB)
灰度（色彩方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB)
颜色（色彩方案：Original Colour Pro，色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB)
颜色（色彩方案：Original Colour Pro，色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB)
色彩空间（色彩方案：原色 Pro，色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案：原色 Pro，色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6905 ms rise
↘ 0.623 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.87 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4885 ms rise
↘ 0.3775 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

在室外，这款功能强大的相机给人留下了良好的印象，在大多数光线条件下都能保持较高的可读性，从良好到优秀不等。不过，在较浅的视角下，反光可能会影响可视性。

小米 15 超户外
室外（垂直）
小米 15 超户外
室外（水平）

小米 15 Ultra 的视角稳定性也非常出色。在极浅的可视角度下，仅能明显感觉到轻微的蓝色色调，亮度也略有下降。

小米 15 Ultra 的视角稳定性
小米 15 Ultra 的视角稳定性

性能骁龙 8 精英版为小米 15 Ultra 提供动力

小米 15 Ultra 采用高通公司的旗舰产品 骁龙 8 精英版可使用高达 16 GB 的内存。这款 SoC 是目前同类产品中速度最快的之一，在Android 领域仅被主频更高的 vivo Xeon 所超越。的的 Galaxy S25 Ultra.

在基准测试中，小米智能手机取得了不俗的成绩，但与骁龙名义上的全部潜能相比还略有不足。具体来说，在系统基准测试中，Honor 和三星的表现更好。不过，这种差异在日常使用中并不明显，小米 15 Ultra 的流畅和无缝性能给人留下了深刻印象。

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
3479 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3200 Points +3%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3099 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2847 - 3228, n=9)
3084 Points 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3050 Points -2%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2605 Points -16%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2254 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=188, last 2 years)
1508 Points -51%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10020 Points +3%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9685 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8731 - 10401, n=9)
9528 Points -2%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9019 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
8568 Points -12%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
7480 Points -23%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6933 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=188, last 2 years)
4271 Points -56%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2474369 - 3015111, n=9)
2690093 Points +6%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2534721 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2474369 Points -2%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2374537 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2262067 Points -11%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1987321 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1739816 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=124, last 2 years)
1310811 Points -48%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (18231 - 27169, n=9)
22390 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20764 Points +12%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20630 Points +11%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18590 Points
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
17260 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=194, last 2 years)
13563 Points -27%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12314 Points -34%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2354 Points +24%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2259 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1153 - 2674, n=8)
2041 Points +8%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1898 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1517 Points -20%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1239 Points -35%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1145 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=166, last 2 years)
954 Points -50%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
13729 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13325 Points +11%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11984 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8334 - 13729, n=8)
11094 Points -7%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10871 Points -9%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
10697 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 13729, n=160, last 2 years)
6608 Points -45%
System
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19891 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17171 Points +20%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15843 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (10849 - 19891, n=8)
15523 Points +9%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14292 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12891 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 19891, n=160, last 2 years)
10420 Points -27%
Memory
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
17503 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17355 Points -1%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
15541 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7263 - 18911, n=8)
13500 Points -23%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
12716 Points -27%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9432 Points -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=160, last 2 years)
7221 Points -59%
Graphics
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
56004 Points +29%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
51041 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45562 Points +5%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
43358 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (35527 - 51041, n=8)
42371 Points -2%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
33187 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=160, last 2 years)
18693 Points -57%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2322 Points +22%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2252 Points +18%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2089 Points +10%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1923 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1901 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1202 - 2363, n=8)
1792 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=160, last 2 years)
1592 Points -16%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
75143 Points +285%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
23281 Points +19%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20782 Points +7%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19512 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=151, last 2 years)
18072 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8865 - 22767, n=8)
17676 Points -9%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
14617 Points -25%
AImark - Score v3.x
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
51509 Points +2449%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1790 - 307528, n=9)
35868 Points +1675%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
33044 Points +1535%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
27025 Points +1237%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2021 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1923 Points -5%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1796 Points -11%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1491 Points -26%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1368 Points +136%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=45, last 2 years)
764 Points +32%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
682 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
666 Points +15%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
580 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (267 - 754, n=5)
535 Points -8%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9283 Points +1492%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=45, last 2 years)
3546 Points +508%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
679 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
662 Points +14%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
583 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (271 - 755, n=5)
523 Points -10%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12709 Points +872%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=45, last 2 years)
5123 Points +292%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1586 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1428 Points +9%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1307 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (641 - 1765, n=5)
1219 Points -7%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=35, last 2 years)
953 Points +264%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
262 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
248 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
240 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (137 - 287, n=4)
234 Points -11%
Score V6
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10818 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10742 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10621 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (302 - 10957, n=8)
5757 Points -47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 10957, n=33, last 2 years)
4033 Points -63%

图形加速由集成的 Adreno 830.基准测试显示的模式与之前的测试类似：性能很强，但略微落后于一些竞争设备。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6907 Points +19%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5933 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5794 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5383 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4739 Points -18%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4690 Points -19%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6845 Points +18%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6303 Points +9%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5809 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5800 Points 0%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4937 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4752 Points -18%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26614 Points +21%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23837 Points +9%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
21937 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
18368 Points -16%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16691 Points -24%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12395 Points +24%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10066 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
9972 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9461 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8146 Points -18%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7523 Points -25%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12711 Points +26%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10634 Points +6%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
10070 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9553 Points -5%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8289 Points -18%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8264 Points -18%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2397 Points +3%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2334 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2334 (17.3min - 17.3max) Points 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2248 Points -4%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1998 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
1715 Points -27%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2651 Points +18%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2272 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2253 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2253 (16.7min - 16.7max) Points 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2069 Points -8%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2054 Points -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
744 fps +4%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
717 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps -1%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
631 fps -12%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
536 fps -25%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
529 fps -26%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps -47%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps +13%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
469 fps +12%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
418 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
368 fps -12%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
328 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
324 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
341 fps +16%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
293 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
284 fps -3%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
250 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
225 fps -23%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps +7%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
97 fps
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -38%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -38%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
179 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
172 fps -4%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
161 fps -10%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
143 fps -20%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
102 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps +10%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
91 fps
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -34%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -34%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -34%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +1%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
106 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98 fps -8%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps -15%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps -25%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
56 fps -47%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
259 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
257 fps -1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
237 fps -8%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
192 fps -26%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
184 fps -29%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +6%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
49 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps -10%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41 fps -16%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
30 fps -39%

浏览器性能稳定，小米 15 Ultra 在同类产品中处于中等水平。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
353.735 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
315.056 Points +22%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
284.674 Points +10%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
257.756 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (89.7 - 289, n=10)
229 Points -11%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
215.998 Points -16%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
146.13 Points -43%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=170, last 2 years)
130.3 Points -49%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
557 runs/min +43%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
425 runs/min +9%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
419 runs/min +7%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
390 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (342 - 419, n=5)
385 runs/min -1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
269 runs/min -31%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
220 runs/min -44%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
155.5 runs/min -60%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
33.5 runs/min +34%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
29.3 runs/min +17%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
26.1 runs/min +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 34, n=9)
26.1 runs/min +4%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
25 runs/min
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
16.3 runs/min -35%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=84, last 2 years)
12.4 runs/min -50%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
11 runs/min -56%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
271 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
236 Points +38%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
196 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (125 - 255, n=8)
194 Points +13%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
171 Points
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
156 Points -9%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
147 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=160, last 2 years)
122.3 Points -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
100368 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
99202 Points +35%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
89248 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (37943 - 94399, n=9)
79524 Points +8%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
73424 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
60987 Points -17%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
60574 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=208, last 2 years)
40641 Points -45%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=169, last 2 years)
1469 ms * -189%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
688 ms * -35%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
625.4 ms * -23%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
508.2 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (422 - 685, n=9)
485 ms * +5%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
429.4 ms * +16%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
376.8 ms * +26%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
279.4 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

小米 15 Ultra 是首款采用全新 UFS 4.1 存储的智能手机。不过，它并不比竞争对手使用的 UFS 4.0 更快，甚至在传输小数据块的测试中表现稍差--不过这些差异很小，只有在仔细观察时才能发现。新变体的优势在于它支持更现代的 M-PHY 和 UniPro 协议版本。

Xiaomi 15 UltraSamsung Galaxy S25 UltraHonor Magic7 ProOppo Find X8 ProXiaomi 14 UltraAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-10%
-6%
-19%
9%
0%
-34%
Sequential Read 256KB
4109.79
3823.28
-7%
3910.81
-5%
3482.9
-15%
4102.56
0%
4110 ?(n=1)
0%
1973 ?(269 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
3761.19
3361.24
-11%
3683.81
-2%
3498.5
-7%
3095.36
-18%
3761 ?(n=1)
0%
1580 ?(94.2 - 4030, n=192, last 2 years)
-58%
Random Read 4KB
312.69
287.85
-8%
282.34
-10%
375.7
20%
362.88
16%
313 ?(n=1)
0%
280 ?(47.6 - 504, n=192, last 2 years)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
379.29
331.61
-13%
357.04
-6%
100.4
-74%
527.15
39%
379 ?(n=1)
0%
320 ?(9.4 - 964, n=192, last 2 years)
-16%

游戏120 FPS 游戏性能的小米智能手机

小米 15 Ultra 可实现高帧率（HFR）游戏而不影响细节，还支持基于硬件的光线追踪。大尺寸显示屏和大功率扬声器使整机更加完美。

我们使用GameBench 测试了游戏性能：《荒野大镖客》始终流畅运行，没有出现任何问题，而《PUBG Mobile》偶尔会出现掉帧现象，不过由于 FPS 始终保持在较高水平，因此掉帧现象并不严重。

小米 15 Ultra 上的 PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
英雄联盟小米 15 Ultra 上的狂野飙车
英雄联盟荒野大镖客
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Ultra; League of Legends: Wild Rift; lowest: Ø119.5 (100-120)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra; League of Legends: Wild Rift; max: Ø59.8 (56-61)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.6.0: Ø115.5 (84-120)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.6.0: Ø59.7 (49-61)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (35-41)

排放：SoC 在持续负载下节流

温度

小米 15 Ultra 某些区域的表面温度最高可达 42.7 °C，这既不会影响日常使用，也不会造成技术问题。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，会出现明显的节流现象。虽然这种现象比14 Ultra 更为明显，但与竞争对手相比，其严重程度往往较低。

Max. Load
 42.1 °C42.7 °C41.1 °C 
 41.7 °C42.3 °C39.1 °C 
 41.1 °C42.1 °C37.5 °C 
Maximum: 42.7 °C
Average: 41.1 °C
38.7 °C38.9 °C35.6 °C
37.9 °C41.9 °C37 °C
35 °C39.4 °C39.2 °C
Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 38.2 °C
Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
94.6 % +50%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92.3 % +47%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64.4 % +2%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
63 %
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.6 % -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.9 % -13%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % +12%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
67.6 %
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.5 % -3%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 % -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.3 % -23%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
72.6 % +9%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.1 % +8%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
66.6 %
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.5 % -17%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 % -25%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
% -100%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
73.4 % +13%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.4 % +5%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
65 %
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 % -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.6 % -22%
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø30 (26.1-38.6)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (21.9-41.9)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø20.8 (19.3-29.5)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø32.2 (30.7-33.8)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø106.7 (86-136.6)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø91 (76-138.4)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (56.7-59.9)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø118.2 (112.9-124.7)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø29.5 (25.1-37.7)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø26 (19.8-39.8)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø20.8 (20.2-27.7)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø30.1 (27.8-31.1)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø14.2 (11.9-18.3)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.4 (10-19.8)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø10.9 (10.6-14.4)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3, with Fan: Ø15.2 (15.2-15.3)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15 (13.7-15.3)

发言人

小米 15 Ultra 的双扬声器音质不错，音量很大。不过，在高音量时，高音略显明显，导致声音尖锐。

在有线音频方面，USB 端口可用于音频传输。无线方面，蓝牙 6.0 提供了广泛的编解码器支持，但 LC3 显然不在支持之列，尽管它在规格中被列为支持。此外，还支持 Auracast。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203343.72527.539.63122.838.84026.340.45036.441.66321.139.98020.743.610019.645.312512.650.316016.357.520016.356.525013.159.231512.460.1400106150010.867.663012.471.680011.976.5100011.679.6125012.480.8160011.678.2200011.377.6250011.981.3315012.184.8400013.181.7500013.179.4630013.780.4800013.379.91000013.678.51250013.768.81600014.269SPL24.692.1N0.692.6median 12.6median 77.6Delta1.18.838.443.230.640.119.240.421.539.636.944.224.447.719.746.315.84714.150.615.260.112.459.29.560.99.763.410.566.4970.29.873.98.976.69.479.711.579.211.278.31283.911.783.41282.31282.912.58312.981.113.38013.578.613.569.513.665.623.9930.598.2median 12median 78.31.58.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 15 UltraSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命：尽管电池容量较小，但运行时间出色

耗电量

小米 15 Ultra 的功耗很低，即使在负载情况下，系统芯片所需的能量也相对较少。这很可能是基准测试速度稍慢的原因，因为小米似乎在这方面把效率放在首位。

智能手机的无线充电功率可达 80 瓦，有线充电功率可达 90 瓦--前提是你有合适的电源适配器。这样，56 分钟即可充满电（50%：18 分钟；80%：33 分钟；90%：41 分钟）。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.18 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.49 / 0.87 / 0.94 Watt
Load midlight 8.82 / 9.26 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
5410 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh		Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh		Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh		Oppo Find X8 Pro
5910 mAh		Xiaomi 14 Ultra
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-27%
-20%
-56%
-1%
-12%
-37%
-40%
Idle Minimum *
0.49
0.55
-12%
0.42
14%
0.94
-92%
0.6
-22%
0.8
-63%
0.751 ?(0.49 - 0.99, n=8)
-53%
0.87 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=158, last 2 years)
-78%
Idle Average *
0.87
0.77
11%
1.55
-78%
1.5
-72%
0.8
8%
0.89
-2%
1.278 ?(0.87 - 2.06, n=8)
-47%
1.444 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=158, last 2 years)
-66%
Idle Maximum *
0.94
0.91
3%
1.58
-68%
1.57
-67%
0.9
4%
0.91
3%
1.358 ?(0.94 - 2.1, n=8)
-44%
1.592 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=158, last 2 years)
-69%
Load Average *
8.82
13.81
-57%
3.41
61%
11.03
-25%
6.8
23%
8.99
-2%
9.45 ?(6.7 - 13, n=8)
-7%
6.9 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=151, last 2 years)
22%
Load Maximum *
9.26
16.69
-80%
11.82
-28%
11.68
-26%
10.9
-18%
9.01
3%
12.3 ?(8.86 - 19.2, n=8)
-33%
10.3 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=151, last 2 years)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.82 (0.623-9.24)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.9 (0.652-11.1)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.573 (0.516-0.889)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.685 (0.559-0.896)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.2 (8.42-9.27)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.6 (10.5-10.8)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.573 (0.516-0.889)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.685 (0.559-0.896)

运行时间

小米 15 Ultra 的电池容量为 5,410 毫安时，虽然小于中国版本（6,000 毫安时），但在测试中的续航能力非常出色。与前代产品相比，这些结果也明显更好。不过，在大多数情况下，竞争对手的续航时间仍然更长。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
44h 48min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 132)
21h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
27h 30min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 29min
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
5410 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh		Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh		Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh		Oppo Find X8 Pro
5910 mAh		Xiaomi 14 Ultra
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
8%
37%
6%
29%
-35%
Reader / Idle
2688
2750
2%
4226
57%
2527
-6%
3665
36%
1983
-26%
H.264
1650
1935
17%
1990
21%
1806
9%
1976
20%
1055
-36%
WiFi v1.3
1270
1331
5%
1249
-2%
1481
17%
1411
11%
751
-41%
Load
209
223
7%
357
71%
217
4%
309
48%
131
-37%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米 15 Ultra 提供了符合高端智能手机标准的全面配置。唯一值得注意的疏漏是 UWB（超宽带）和更新支持，后者并非顶级产品。作为回报，它拥有目前最好的摄像头配置之一。

Xiaomi 15 Ultra - 03/07/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
69 / 69 → 99%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
92%
Games Performance
43 / 55 → 78%
Application Performance
80 / 85 → 95%
AI Performance
33%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
84 / 90 → 93%
Camera
88%
Average
71%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
97.3%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
78%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 55.1%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 15 Ultra 评测--搭载徕卡的动力之王
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-03-11 (Update: 2025-03-11)