Notebookcheck Logo
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

努比亚红魔 8S Pro 评测--游戏智能手机的风扇控制更出色

Beskar 电话

RedMagic 8S Pro 再次采用了当前的骁龙 8 处理器,并在外壳中集成了可控主动风扇。与去年的机型相比,只有轻微的升级,与 RedMagic 8 Pro 的差异微乎其微。
5G Android Gaming Smartphone Touchscreen
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro (RedMagic Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.80 inch 20:9, 2480 x 1116 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive, up to 960 Hz touch sampling rate, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 473.85 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Audio Jack (3.5 mm), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: G-sensor, Electronic Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Sensor hub, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19, BC0), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28a, 28b, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G Sub6 (Band 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.47 x 163.98 x 76.35
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung GN5, 1/1.57", f/1.88, 82°) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 120°) + 2 MPix (f/2.4, 78°); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (UDC, f/2.0, 1.12 µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, Clear phone case, 65W-Charger, USB-C-Cabel, SIM-Tool, RedMagic OS 8.0, 12 Months Warranty, Shoulder Trigger Buttons: 520Hz touch sampling rate touchpads; Game Space Switch: Toggles special game mode on or off; RGB Light: fully customizable lighting effects; 20,000 RPM high-speed turbofan; DRM Widevine L1; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a)
Weight
228 g, Power Supply: 125 g
Price
779 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
88.3 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
228 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2480x1116
85.9 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
228 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2480x1116
90.2 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
239 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2448x1080
85.9 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
210 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

外壳和功能 - 全新设计的 RedMagic 8S Pro

RedMagic 8S Pro 的根本创新在于其全新的设计,与前代产品 7S Pro以及姊妹机型 8 Pro.8S Pro 的设计更加棱角分明,有午夜版(12 GB 内存、256 GB UFS 4.0、649 欧元)、铂金版(16 GB 内存、512 GB UFS 4.0、779 欧元)和极光版(16 GB 内存、512 GB UFS 4.0、799 欧元)。我们的测试机是铂金版,其条形外观和金属光泽外壳让人联想到贝斯卡钢。现在,所有版本都配备了 LED 风扇。

做工精良,缝隙紧密均匀,令人信服。显示屏与表面的比例为 89%,达到了很好的水平,并再次得到改进,这部分归功于显示屏下的摄像头(UDC)。右侧长边的两个触摸表面可配置为游戏的附加输入元素,采样率也达到了 520 Hz。

(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
带保护盖的 RedMagic 8S Pro(照片:Daniel Schmidt)

尺寸比较

173 mm 77 mm 10.3 mm 239 g164.5 mm 77 mm 9.47 mm 228 g163.98 mm 76.35 mm 9.47 mm 228 g162.5 mm 76.7 mm 8.5 mm 210 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

通信、软件和操作 - 配备 Wi-Fi 功能的游戏手机 7

在测试中,RedMagic 8S Pro 的移动连接功能并不明显,智能手机可以依靠宽频带支持。将手机放在耳边时,电话功能表现不错,但对环境噪声的抑制却相当一般。有了 Wi-Fi 7,智能手机支持最先进的 WLAN 标准,在连接测试中也显示出强劲的进步。在 6 GHz 网络中传输速率非常好,但在 2.4 和 5.0 GHz 网络中只使用了 VHT80。

RedMagic 智能手机装有谷歌Android 13 和 RedMagic OS 8.0 界面。在测试时,安全补丁的有效期已到 2023 年 6 月 1 日,因此仍然是最新的。制造商保证将更新至Android 14,而且还将提供长达两年的安全补丁。这些补丁在前六个月每两个月推出一次,之后每三个月推出一次。

生物识别安全由集成在显示屏中的光学指纹扫描仪提供,其工作令人满意,甚至可以测量脉搏。此外,还可以通过前置摄像头进行安全性较低的面部识别。除了两个额外的电容式肩按键外,边框上还有一个醒目的红色按钮,可将智能手机切换到一个特殊的游戏界面。在这里可以对各个游戏进行设置,还可以对可能连接的配件进行管理。

Networking
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
979 (min: 959) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
988 (min: 487) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1639 (min: 824) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1689 (min: 1571) MBit/s ∼92%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
887 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
734 (min: 569) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1838 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1840 (min: 1760) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
946 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
822 (min: 748) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1760 (min: 1669) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1522 (min: 1471) MBit/s ∼83%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
902 (min: 875) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
824 (min: 405) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1768 (min: 1697) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1342 (min: 580) MBit/s ∼73%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1611 (824-1697)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1760 (1669-1815)
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1680 (1571-1722)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1471-1568)
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø960 (487-993)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø821 (748-844)
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø979 (959-999)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø947 (911-978)

摄像机 - RedMagic 8 Pro 的可靠设置

与 RedMagic 8S Pro 自拍
与 RedMagic 8S Pro 自拍

相机设置与姊妹机型相同 RedMagic 8 Pro.正面有一个显示屏下摄像头(UDC),几乎看不到。使用该摄像头拍摄的照片并不出众,但也绰绰有余。

背面的三摄像头配有一个超广角和一个微距镜头。5000 万像素的主摄像头在日光下拍摄的照片效果不错,色彩还原比较自然,但附加镜头的质量却相当一般。

主镜头最多可拍摄高分辨率的 8K 视频。前置镜头只能拍摄全高清视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow Light
ColorChecker
10.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro: 8.52 ∆E min: 2.77 - max: 13.99 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
17 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro: 15.55 ∆E min: 7.94 - max: 21.58 ∆E

显示屏 - RedMagic 8S Pro,120 Hz OLED 显示屏调整更佳

子像素结构
子像素结构

RedMagic 8S Pro 的 OLED 显示屏与其姊妹机型在技术上完全相同 8 Pro在规格表上完全相同,但在测量中却显示出更为自然的色彩还原。反过来,它的亮度也不尽如人意,但差别只是可测量的。

在纯白显示屏上,8S Pro 通过激活环境光传感器可达到 787 cd/m²。如果明亮的表面均匀分布(APL18),亮度会上升到 932 cd/m²。手动控制亮度时,最高亮度可达 524 cd/m²。

努比亚采用永久直流调光,以防止 OLED 闪烁。60 Hz 的频率相当低,但调制水平较低,振幅曲线均匀。

771
cd/m²
775
cd/m²
787
cd/m²
771
cd/m²
775
cd/m²
785
cd/m²
778
cd/m²
775
cd/m²
784
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 787 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 777.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 775 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.8"
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Response Times
28%
276%
66%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.06 ?(1.027, 1.03)
0.87 ?(0.4345, 0.436)
58%
1.29 ?(0.6245, 0.6675)
37%
0.89 ?(0.423, 0.468)
57%
Response Time Black / White *
1.88 ?(1.065, 0.819)
1.37 ?(0.7155, 0.656)
27%
1.2 ?(0.6115, 0.5925)
36%
1.14 ?(0.557, 0.585)
39%
PWM Frequency
60
60
0%
513
755%
121.4
102%
Screen
-49%
12%
-5%
Brightness middle
775
811
5%
1010
30%
807
4%
Brightness
778
817
5%
1016
31%
806
4%
Brightness Distribution
98
91
-7%
95
-3%
99
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
2.9
-123%
1.3
-0%
1.2
8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.4
4.7
-96%
2.5
-4%
3.1
-29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
3.4
-79%
1.6
16%
2.2
-16%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.39 92%
2.24 98%
2.2 100%
CCT
6693 97%
6390 102%
6405 101%
6439 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-11% / -23%
144% / 100%
31% / 19%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.88 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.065 ms rise
↘ 0.819 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.06 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.027 ms rise
↘ 1.03 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
50 % 显示屏亮度
50 %
75 % 显示屏亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

灰度(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
灰度(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩空间(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩空间(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
饱和度(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
饱和度(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
RedMagic 8S Pro 户外
户外活动
RedMagic 8S Pro 的视角
视角

性能、排放和电池寿命--刹不住车,你就输了

RedMagic 8S Pro 配备了 骁龙 8 第二代处理器并可根据型号使用 12 或 16 GB 工作内存。由于集成了风扇,这款游戏智能手机的性能非常出色,在任何情况下都能保持绝对稳定。努比亚对风扇的控制进行了一些改进,因为在满载情况下风扇的声音不再那么刺耳,但几乎和 8 Pro 一样响亮。通过切换到 "Burnout "基准来模拟满载,RedMagic 8S Pro 现在在表面上也非常响亮。

两个扬声器的表现还算不错。不过,由于风扇的缘故,耳机更适合用于游戏,尤其是音频插孔被证明噪音相当低(声压级:75.61 dBFS)。无线耳机还提供广泛的音频编解码支持(SBC、AAC、LC3、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+ 和 LDAC)。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1574 Points
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1496 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1482 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1048 - 1574, n=20)
1455 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1298 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1021 Points -35%
Multi-Core
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5238 Points +2%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5182 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5129 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4192 - 5243, n=20)
4918 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3624 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3404 Points -34%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2104 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1432 - 2104, n=17)
1926 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=165, last 2 years)
1478 Points -30%
Multi-Core
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5648 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4255 - 5765, n=17)
5226 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=165, last 2 years)
4126 Points -27%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
19783 Points +14%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
17399 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 20394, n=24)
15817 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13827 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)
13055 Points -25%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
12600 Points -28%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=71, last 2 years)
3075 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=71, last 2 years)
3259 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=71, last 2 years)
3280 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
16291 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
16100 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
16067 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10839 - 16291, n=19)
14676 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9873 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 22303, n=160, last 2 years)
7934 Points -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
26802 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
25478 Points -5%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
25350 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (18010 - 26802, n=19)
24462 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
16937 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33560, n=160, last 2 years)
11805 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7042 Points +3%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
7036 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
6866 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4177 - 7042, n=19)
6150 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10259, n=160, last 2 years)
4663 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4182 Points -39%
Wild Life Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  ()
13896 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=109, last 2 years)
2859 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
Points
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14737 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14093 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (12705 - 14737, n=22)
13957 Points -5%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
13956 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9837 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 21065, n=181, last 2 years)
7682 Points -48%
Wild Life Extreme
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
3935 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
3773 Points -4%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
3732 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (3192 - 3935, n=23)
3674 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2578 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=188, last 2 years)
2114 Points -46%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
3900 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
3732 Points -4%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
3647 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (3088 - 3900, n=24)
3629 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2537 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=186, last 2 years)
2107 Points -46%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
123 fps +105%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (45 - 143, n=24)
83.3 fps +39%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
62 fps +3%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
60 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)
51.6 fps -14%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
165 fps
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
163 fps -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (82 - 181, n=24)
150.2 fps -9%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
108 fps -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)
82.4 fps -50%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
77 fps +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (35 - 97, n=24)
62.3 fps +4%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
60 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 (ES3.1)
56 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)
38.5 fps -36%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
72 fps
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
63 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (24 - 72, n=24)
60.8 fps -16%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
37 fps -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)
33.2 fps -54%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
33 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (18 - 33, n=22)
29.1 fps -12%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
29 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 52, n=203, last 2 years)
15.6 fps -53%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288 (Edge 108)
54773 Points +4%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Edge 115)
52492 Points
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Chrome 115)
19870 Points -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (19870 - 65418, n=25)
45827 Points -13%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
42421 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37721 Points -28%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 (MS Edge 102)
30884 Points -41%
Nubia RedMagic 8S ProNubia RedMagic 8 ProAsus ROG Phone 7 UltimateXiaomi Poco F4 GTAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
6%
13%
-28%
4%
-39%
Sequential Read 256KB
3576.35
3556.62
-1%
3429.17
-4%
1832.34
-49%
Sequential Write 256KB
2682.03
2719.64
1%
3061.82
14%
1482.42
-45%
Random Read 4KB
369.76
393.88
7%
450.1
22%
328.58
-11%
Random Write 4KB
479.52
551.93
15%
572.05
19%
457.69
-5%

温度

Max. Load
 55.8 °C55.6 °C52.5 °C 
 55.8 °C55.6 °C50.6 °C 
 54.3 °C55.6 °C53 °C 
Maximum: 55.8 °C
Average: 54.3 °C
48.5 °C52.4 °C49.5 °C
50.9 °C52.5 °C50.4 °C
49.5 °C48.9 °C47.5 °C
Maximum: 52.5 °C
Average: 50 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 54.3 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.8 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.5 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
99.6 (23.1min - 23.2max) %
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
98.2 (22min - 22.4max) % -1%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
96.3 (21.7min - 22.6max) % -3%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
46.2 (7.07min - 15.3max) % -54%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
99.8 (81min - 81.2max) % 0%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
99.4 (83.8min - 84.3max) %
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
91.8 (74.6min - 81.2max) % -8%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
50.4 (27.7min - 54.9max) % -49%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
99.9 (83.9min - 84max) %

Legend

 
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.1.2-rc1: Ø18.4 (18.4-18.4)
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.1.2-rc1: Ø18.6 (18.5-18.6)
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.2)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø22.4 (21.7-22.6)
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.0.2: Ø84 (83.8-84.3)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø80.2 (74.6-81.2)

Fan

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.937.52522.335.63123.234.24025.429.45031.134632020.38017.821.210017.519.212517.3151601519.320015.115.325016.321.431513.518.640013.917.450013.419.363013.320.980011.720.610001422.212501427.4160013.331.920001333.8250013.533.3315014.335.1400013.432.5500014.729.4630013.632.6800014.130.5100001430.11250014.225.71600013.822.2SPL25.843.3N0.73.8median 14median 22.2Delta0.75.833.836.227.928.224.325.628.227.136.735.322.221.525.420.42120.618.620.415.419.515.118.513.133.11226.312.716.411.820.812.919.610.421.413.322.313.225.912.130.712.233.812.935.114.837.315.83416.129.414.431.413.630.713.532.314.432.51531.925.944.30.74.2median 13.5median 29.41.36.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseNubia RedMagic 8S ProNubia RedMagic 8 Pro

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.9412522.337.53123.2364025.442.25031.141.5632042.38017.840.610017.543.512517.348.61601552.320015.153.325016.356.431513.559.240013.959.850013.467.663013.371.980011.773.810001477.312501480.5160013.380.920001383250013.582.4315014.384.8400013.482.7500014.779.8630013.674.1800014.166100001464.91250014.263.41600013.854.5SPL25.892.4N0.786.1median 14median 71.9Delta0.710.929.634.5303424.53325.838.137.543.625.238.920.24220.445.717.554.714.459.714.359.715.258.811.966.113.568.212.174.712.474.511.775.311.879.411.479.112.380.712.280.212.181.312.280.212.980.813.478.713.276.112.970.713.669.313.472.313.258.124.890.70.687median 12.9median 74.70.98.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNubia RedMagic 8S ProAsus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
6000 mAh
1120 min +9%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
6000 mAh
1050 min +2%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
6000 mAh
1026 min
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years)
985 min -4%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
4700 mAh
747 min -27%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 115)
17h 06min

Pros

+ 性能高且稳定
+ 附加触摸传感器
+ 不间断的灵敏显示
+ 电池续航时间长

Cons

- 温度很高
- 仅更新两年
- 风扇声音大

结论 - RedMagic 8S Pro 是性能之王

回顾:努比亚红魔 8S Pro。测试设备由努比亚红魔提供。
回顾:努比亚红魔 8S Pro。测试设备由努比亚红魔提供。

在测试中,RedMagic 8S Pro 表现出了真正的纯种游戏玩家的风范,由于集成了风扇,它可以毫不妥协地提高性能。遗憾的是,这也意味着其表面会变得相当热。

额外的肩部传感器是游戏时的真正附加值,显示屏下方的前置摄像头(UDC)意味着没有任何东西会干扰内容的查看。

努比亚红魔 8S Pro 是目前速度最快的智能手机!

总的来说,RedMagic 智能手机证明了它的全面性,它还支持 NFC、蓝牙 5.3、Wi-Fi 7 和 5G。不过,在摄像头设置方面不得不做出妥协。扬声器很不错,但在这里你会发现 8S Pro 的价格比 ROG Phone 7音频插孔也是如此。

除了华硕智能手机,还有 红魔 8 Pro也是一个有趣的选择。它在价格上处于同一水平,在技术上几乎没有差别。充其量,设计可能是决定性因素。

价格和供应情况

RedMagic 8S Pro 可直接从制造商处购买,起价 649 美元。.此外,美国亚马逊也有售,配备 16GB RAM 和 512GB ROM 的机型售价约为 900 美元。

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro - 08/22/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
66 / 70 → 95%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
92%
Games Performance
82 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
97 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
75%
Noise
63%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Average
81%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 努比亚红魔 8S Pro 评测--游戏智能手机的风扇控制更出色
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-08-23 (Update: 2023-08-23)