Notebookcheck Logo

华硕ROG手机7终极版揭秘：目前最好的游戏智能手机

戏院。

华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate是一款不折不扣的游戏智能手机。几乎所有的硬件都是高端的，如骁龙8代，16GB内存，512GB存储和6.78英寸165Hz显示屏。清单还没有结束，因为还包括一个6000毫安时的电池和一个外置风扇，等等。
5G Android Gaming Smartphone Touchscreen
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate

华硕最近发布了其最新的游戏智能手机，ROG Phone 7 Ultimate。与它已经很强大的前辈相比， ROG Phone 6 Pro，制造商再次改进了处理器。该处理器 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2是目前最快的Android SoC之一。同时，改进的冷却系统确保了更有效的散热。

终极版还配备了一个通过USB-C对接的外部风扇，并有四个额外的控制按钮。

ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的显示屏与前代产品一样强大：6.78英寸AMOLED面板的分辨率为2448 x 1080，帧率高达165赫兹，采用720赫兹的触摸采样率。

Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (ROG Phone 7 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 740
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.78 inch 20.4:9, 2448 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, 720 Hz touch sampling rate, 23 ms touch latency, Gorilla Glass Victus, 2nd display on backcover: ROG Vision color PMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 165 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 484 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerator, E-Compass, Proximity, Ambient light sensor, in-display fingerprint sensor, Gyro, Hall sensor, Ultrasonic sensors for AirTrigger system for grip/press detection, IP54 rating, NTFS support for external storage, 2x2 MIMO, Wi-Fi-Direct; QC3.0+QC5.0/PD3.0, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/28/26/28/32/34/38/39/40/41/43/48/66), 5G (Band 1/2/3/4/7/8/12/18/20/25/26/28/38/40/41/48/66/77/78/79), Head SAR 1.485 W/Kg, Body SAR 1.579 W/Kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 10.3 x 173 x 77
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, dual 3000 mAh batteries
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX766, 1/1.56”, 1µm pixel size, f/1.9, 23.8mm) + 13 MP ultrawide camera (12.5mm) + 8 MP macro camera; video recording up to 8K@24fps with EIS
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix Omnivision OV32 (29.4mm); video recording up to FullHD@30fps with EIS
Additional features
Speakers: dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 65W charger, AeroActive Cooler 7, USB-C cable, protective case, SIM tray needle, documentation, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
239 g, Power Supply: 127 g
Price
1399 Euro
Links
Asus homepage
Asus notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
90.2 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		239 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2448x1080
90.3 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core		240 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
89.5 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		239 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2448x1080
85.9 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		228 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2480x1116
90.3 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy S23+
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		195 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.60"2340x1080
85.7 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		220 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.9 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		210 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

外壳 - 背面有第二个显示屏

背面的PMOLED显示屏。
背面的PMOLED显示屏。

第一眼就可以看出，ROG Phone 7 Ultimate是一款游戏智能手机。我们的测试设备与标准版ROG Phone 7的不同之处在于其后置PMOLED显示屏。

迷你显示屏所显示的内容可以通过Armory Crate应用进行配置，该应用还管理所有的游戏配置文件。有大约60种动画可供选择，用于各种动作，如X模式、游戏开始、新通知或来电。

从外观上看，ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的外壳颜色也与标准版本不同，它有黑色和白色可供选择。另一方面，我们的测试机只有白色，其磨砂背面的特点是略微有区别的双色设计，其中后盖的上半部分是较浅的白色。

ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的制作非常精良，尽管它有6.78英寸的对角线，但却无视所有试图扭曲它或凹陷它的企图。它的重量为239克，与ROG Phone 6 Pro的重量，使其成为一个相当沉重的重量级产品。82%的显示屏与表面的比率也不是很好。另一方面，短边上稍厚的屏幕框架有效地防止了游戏智能手机在横向模式下的错误打字。

ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的后盖由大猩猩玻璃3保护，显示屏由大猩猩玻璃Victus保护。这款智能手机不防水，但通过了IP54认证，因此可以防止灰尘和溅水。

华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate

尺寸比较

❌
173 mm 77 mm 10.3 mm 239 g173 mm 77 mm 10.3 mm 239 g164.5 mm 77 mm 9.47 mm 228 g163.9 mm 76.5 mm 9.5 mm 220 g162.5 mm 76.7 mm 8.5 mm 210 g160.7 mm 77.6 mm 7.85 mm 240 g157.8 mm 76.2 mm 7.6 mm 195 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 16GB内存和512GB存储

华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate只有一种配置：丰富的16GB LPDDR5X内存和512GB UFS 4.0存储，官方价格约为1200美元。

两个USB-C端口对于智能手机来说是不寻常的。底部的USB-C端口以USB 2.0的速度工作，主要用于为智能手机充电，支持快速充电3.0和PD 3.0。第二个USB-C端口位于左侧长条形的中间，以USB 3.2 Gen.2速度运行，也支持快速充电5.0，并能通过DisplayPort 1.4输出4K。两个Nano SIM卡可以放入SIM卡槽。

左边：AirTrigger，电源按钮，音量摇杆，AirTrigger
左边：AirTrigger，电源按钮，音量摇杆，AirTrigger
右边：外部风扇的对接PIN，USB-C 3.2 Gen.2，SIM卡插槽
右边：外部风扇的对接PIN，USB-C 3.2 Gen.2，SIM卡插槽
顶部：无端口
顶部：无端口
底部：USB-C 2.0，3.5毫米插孔
底部：USB-C 2.0，3.5毫米插孔

软件--操作系统升级到Android 15

ROG Phone 7 Ultimate运行Android 13和制造商的ROG UI用户界面。华硕承诺为其智能手机进行两次操作系统升级，并提供四年的安全更新。

ROG UI与标准Android ，主要是在其游戏功能上有所不同。首先，因为最高性能模式，即X模式，直接整合到了UI中。其次，Game Genie和Armory Crate等应用程序不仅可以用来配置性能模式，还可以配置所有重要的智能手机组件，如AirTrigger、后盖显示器和外部风扇。

只有Facebook和Instagram是作为第三方应用预装的，如果不需要，可以很容易地删除。

华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate

通信和GNSS - 快速WLAN，精确GPS

华硕智能手机提供了非常广泛的移动频率覆盖，有24个4G和20个5G频段，因此应该能够在几乎任何地方获得信号。还支持NFC和蓝牙5.2。

这款智能手机使用WiFi 6E和3根天线的Wi-Fi，与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器一起，实现了非常高和稳定的传输速率。不支持Wi-Fi 7。

Networking
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
822 (min: 748) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
946 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1760 (min: 1669) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1522 (min: 1471) MBit/s ∼83%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 643) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
817 (min: 751) MBit/s ∼45%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1553 (min: 1451) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1616 (min: 1469) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1730 (min: 1564) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1617 (min: 1593) MBit/s ∼88%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
734 (min: 569) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
887 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1838 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1840 (min: 1760) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1623 (min: 1491) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1810 (min: 1724) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1804 (min: 902) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1403) MBit/s ∼83%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
853 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
943 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼51%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
824 (min: 405) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
902 (min: 875) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1768 (min: 1697) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1342 (min: 580) MBit/s ∼73%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
713 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
730 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1445 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1373 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼75%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1760 (1669-1815)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1730 (1564-1806)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1471-1568)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1616 (1593-1641)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø821 (748-844)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1551 (1451-1625)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø947 (911-978)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1616 (1469-1714)
室内的GPS信号
室内的GPS信号
室外的GPS信号
室外的GPS信号

在定位方面，ROG Phone 7 Ultimate使用的卫星导航系统包括GPS（L1/L5）、Glonass（L1）、Galileo（E1/E5a）、BeiDou（B1/B2a）、QZSS（L1/L5）到NavIC（L5）。在测试中，智能手机能够快速确定其位置，精确度高达3米。

在一次短暂的自行车旅行中，与Garmin Venu 2智能手表相比，ROG Phone 7 Ultimate证明了它完全适合导航任务。除了极小的偏差外，路线的记录几乎同样准确。

GPS测试：总结
GPS测试：总结
GPS测试：环湖
GPS测试：环湖
GPS测试：循环
GPS测试：循环

电话和语音质量

ROG Phone 7 Ultimate有三个麦克风，确保良好的语音质量，并通过集成的噪音抑制功能可靠地过滤环境噪音。这在免提模式下也很有效。

华硕智能手机有空间容纳两张nano SIM卡。VoLTE也是电话套餐的一部分，同时还可以选择WLAN通话。

照相机--索尼IMX766作为图像传感器

用自拍相机拍照
用自拍相机拍照

相机当然不是游戏智能手机中最重要的角色，但ROG Phone 7 Ultimate在这里也没有留手。通过索尼IMX766，它的50MP主摄像头使用的传感器已经在ROG Phone 6 Pro.

在白天，华硕智能手机拍摄的照片质量很好，其特点是坚实的动态，自然的色彩和高图像清晰度。低变焦水平也能产生体面的结果。然而，在高倍率下，它很快变得嘈杂，传感器在低光拍摄中明显达到了极限。即使如此，这些照片仍然比许多 "非游戏 "智能手机的照片好看。

超广角摄像头的分辨率为1300万像素，明显落后于主摄像头。它的性能对于快照来说是足够的，但如果你仔细看看照片，你很快就会发现它们是相当的像素化和缺乏细节。8MP的微距摄像头具有相对较高的分辨率，但产生清晰可见的图像噪音，即使在良好的照明条件下也是如此。

前置摄像头使用Omnivision OV32作为其图像传感器，分辨率为3200万像素，可以拍摄以非常自然的色彩为特征的体面自拍。它能以每秒30帧的速度录制最大限度的全高清视频。主摄像头能以24帧/秒的速度处理8K视频，并有电子图像稳定功能支持。

用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用微距相机拍照
用微距相机拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra wide angle5x zoomLow light
ColorChecker
9.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate: 7.49 ∆E min: 1.29 - max: 14.83 ∆E
ColorChecker
20.4 ∆E
28 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
35 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
25 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate: 25.86 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 37.95 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括外部风扇

随之而来的是65瓦的电源
随之而来的是65瓦的电源

除了保护壳、65瓦的电源、USB-C电缆、SIM卡工具和用户手册外，华硕智能手机的交货范围还包括AeroActive Cooler 7外置风扇。你还可以从华硕的网店购买其他配件，如适配器、加密狗和对接站。

华硕在德国为ROG Phone 7 Ultimate提供24个月的保修。这在其他国家可能有所不同，所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。

输入设备和操作 - 720 Hz采样率和AirTrigger

由于其反应极为迅速的显示屏，ROG Phone 7 Ultimate是游戏玩家的盛宴。由于其720赫兹的高触摸采样率，AMOLED面板实现了每一个输入，几乎没有任何延迟，确保了整体操作的极其流畅。

除了二维人脸识别，ROG Phone 7 Ultimate还提供了一个用于生物识别的光学指纹传感器，它的识别率非常高。

与前代产品一样，ROG Phone 7 Ultimate再次采用AirTrigger超声波传感器，模拟经典游戏控制器的L和R键。AirTrigger位于右长边的顶部和底部，因此可以用食指轻松触及。

与可安装的AeroActive Cooler 7外置风扇一起，AirTriggers支持总共18种敲击、轻扫和滑动的手势，这又带来了四个输入键。有两种手势是ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的新功能：通过陀螺仪瞄准和 "按压和提升"。后者的功能允许在按下或抬起手指时触发各种反应。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
可附加的外部冷却器风扇AeroActive Cooler 7增加了四个输入按钮。
可附加的外部冷却器风扇AeroActive Cooler 7增加了四个输入按钮。
AeroActive Cooler 7与智能手机的侧面USB-C端口对接。
AeroActive Cooler 7与智能手机的侧面USB-C端口对接。

显示屏 - 具有165赫兹和HDR10+的AMOLED面板

子像素网格
子像素网格

2448 x 1080像素的6.78英寸显示屏支持HDR10+，运行频率高达165 Hz。刷新率由各自的系统模式调整。例如，超耐久 只允许最高60赫兹，而165赫兹只在X模式下可用。刷新率也可以在设置中手动设置，固定在165、144、120、90或60。

相较于 ROG Phone 6 Pro、华硕又一次提高了亮度。AMOLED面板的平均亮度为1016cd/m²，在纯白背景下比前代显示屏的平均亮度为868cd/m²要亮得多。

由于亮区和暗区的均匀分布（APL18），这款智能手机实现了1631 cd/m²的峰值亮度。在没有亮度传感器的情况下，最高可以达到495 cd/m²，在最低亮度水平下，它仍然以相当明亮的4.91 cd/m²闪耀。

在ROG Phone 7 Ultimate中也可以看到典型的OLED面板的PWM闪动。在最低显示亮度下，它在122和513赫兹之间波动。在此之上，波动当然不那么明显，但敏感的用户可能仍然会认为PWM闪烁很烦人。在Android 设置中，有一个直流调光模式，但它只在60赫兹下工作。

995
cd/m²		1018
cd/m²		1029
cd/m²
996
cd/m²		1010
cd/m²		1023
cd/m²
1003
cd/m²		1027
cd/m²		1046
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1046 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1016.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4.91 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1010 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.8"		Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"		Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.8"		Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy S23+
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-2%
-38%
-61%
-37%
-101%
-15%
Brightness middle
1010
1061
5%
860
-15%
811
-20%
1128
12%
642
-36%
807
-20%
Brightness
1016
1057
4%
868
-15%
817
-20%
1136
12%
637
-37%
806
-21%
Brightness Distribution
95
99
4%
97
2%
91
-4%
99
4%
96
1%
99
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.3
-0%
2.4
-85%
2.9
-123%
2.7
-108%
3.19
-145%
1.2
8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.5
3.1
-24%
3.9
-56%
4.7
-88%
4.5
-80%
7.12
-185%
3.1
-24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.6
-0%
2.5
-56%
3.4
-113%
2.6
-63%
4.9
-206%
2.2
-38%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.19 100%
2.08 106%
2.39 92%
2.05 107%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
CCT
6405 101%
6511 100%
6640 98%
6390 102%
6644 98%
7671 85%
6439 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 513 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 513 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 513 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8738 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
闵行区。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

在默认设置下，华硕智能手机提供相当中性的色彩再现。如果你想获得最好的画质，请切换到影院模式并使用我们的色温设置（见截图）。

在这个色温设置下，我们在影院模式下得到了最好的图像质量。
在这个色温设置下，我们在影院模式下得到了最好的图像质量。
色彩保真度（影院模式，色温调整，DCI-P3色彩空间）
色彩保真度（影院模式，色温调整，DCI-P3色彩空间）
色彩空间（影院模式，色温调整，DCI-P3色彩空间）。
色彩空间（影院模式，色温调整，DCI-P3色彩空间）。
灰度（影院模式，色温调整，DCI-P3色彩空间）。
灰度（影院模式，色温调整，DCI-P3色彩空间）。
色彩饱和度（影院模式，色温调整，DCI-P3色彩空间）。
色彩饱和度（影院模式，色温调整，DCI-P3色彩空间）。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6115 ms rise
↘ 0.5925 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6245 ms rise
↘ 0.6675 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

视角稳定的AMOLED显示屏在户外非常容易阅读，而且在明亮的阳光下也有足够的亮度储备。

室外使用（在傍晚的阳光下）。
室外使用（在傍晚的阳光下）。
室外使用（部分阴凉）。
室外使用（部分阴凉）。
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能--ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate搭载了Snapdragon 8 Gen 2是最快的智能手机处理器之一，并由16GB的LPDDR5X内存支持。它的 阿德雷诺740作为该SoC的图形单元。

这款智能手机在合成基准测试中处于领先地位，从性能上看，它无缝地加入了配备骁龙8代2的其他高端智能手机的行列。总体而言，它比ROG Phone 6 Pro快10%左右。 ROG Phone 6 Pro(骁龙8+第一代在Basemark OS II中，比前者的性能优势仅有几个点。AImark的人工智能计算从根本上不适合该SoC。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1885 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1563 Points +5%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1496 Points +1%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1482 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1048 - 1574, n=20)
1455 Points -2%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1309 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1298 Points -12%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1236 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1007 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5533 Points +7%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5238 Points +1%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5182 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4192 - 5243, n=20)
4918 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4906 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
4162 Points -20%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3742 Points -28%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3624 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3359 Points -35%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2008 Points
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1997 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1958 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1753 - 2008, n=10)
1925 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points -37%
Multi-Core
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5702 Points
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5515 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4255 - 5702, n=10)
5234 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5043 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points -41%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1322448 Points
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1300282 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1111522 - 1322448, n=17)
1259049 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1210674 Points -8%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1119358 Points -15%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
978273 Points -26%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
949107 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points -40%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
19783 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
17727 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 20394, n=24)
15817 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
15483 Points -22%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13827 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years)
12972 Points -34%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
12600 Points -36%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12578 Points -36%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1332 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1329 Points +5%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1265 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (778 - 1356, n=22)
1138 Points -10%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1128 Points -11%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1052 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=158, last 2 years)
885 Points -30%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
9555 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (7354 - 9730, n=22)
8794 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8730 Points +3%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8487 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
8406 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6849 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6326 Points -25%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
System
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
14494 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
13602 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10786 - 15148, n=22)
13173 Points +12%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
12962 Points +10%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
11793 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10181 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9473 Points -20%
Memory
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10697 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (6601 - 10834, n=22)
9479 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
9212 Points +2%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9052 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
9017 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7037 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6785 Points -25%
Graphics
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
27384 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (22837 - 32334, n=22)
27375 Points +3%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
26660 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
26616 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
25642 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19984 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
17165 Points -36%
Web
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1963 Points +8%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1826 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1808 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1077 - 2044, n=22)
1777 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1663 Points -9%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1602 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1566 Points -14%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
82801 Points +408%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
16880 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16464 Points +1%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
16295 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=21)
15142 Points -7%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
39328 Points +2788%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (941 - 173234, n=18)
29790 Points +2087%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25873 Points +1800%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1471 Points +8%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1362 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1216 Points -11%

在GPU重度测试中，华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate也表现得非常好，甚至可以击败三星Galaxy S23+在一些3DMark场景中，尽管后者使用的是同一SoC的略高时钟版本，其形式为 骁龙8代2的形式。Galaxy在GFXBench的屏幕测试中，165Hz的最大刷新率得到了很好的利用。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3732 Points
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3647 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3528 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3196 Points -14%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2760 Points -26%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2537 Points -32%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2534 Points -32%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3877 Points +3%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3773 Points
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3732 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3365 Points -11%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2818 Points -25%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2606 Points -31%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2578 Points -32%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14566 Points +3%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14093 Points
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13956 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
12367 Points -12%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11024 Points -22%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10238 Points -27%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9837 Points -30%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7042 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7036 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5777 Points -18%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4743 Points -33%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4182 Points -41%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25478 Points
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25350 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24098 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20955 Points -18%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16937 Points -34%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16100 Points
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16067 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14136 Points -12%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11909 Points -26%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9873 Points -39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
165 fps +14%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -17%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -59%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
480 fps +8%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
455 fps +2%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
446 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
398 fps -11%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
356 fps -20%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
152 fps +5%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -17%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93 fps -36%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -59%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
291 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
289 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
278 fps -4%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
209 fps -28%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
206 fps -29%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
143 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -16%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps -20%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
215 fps +4%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
187 fps -10%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
136 fps -34%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps -35%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +4%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 fps -22%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -43%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
127 fps +4%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
98 fps -20%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps -31%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps +30%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -25%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -27%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
54 fps -30%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps 0%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
41 fps -35%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -41%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -43%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -70%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -2%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -40%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -51%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -65%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
164 fps +1%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
163 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
133 fps -18%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -34%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -40%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -63%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps +7%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -21%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
23 fps -21%

华硕的ROG Phone 7 Ultimate加载网站的速度非常快，打开网站没有任何延迟。另一方面，在浏览器基准测试中，这款智能手机并不总是扮演第一角色，有时表现得略差于 ROG Phone 6 Pro.然而，没有任何Android 智能手机可以与 Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max在浏览器测试中。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
278.979 Points +113%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
176.612 Points +35%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)
144.7 Points +10%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro (Edge 108)
144.42 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23)
133.1 Points +1%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
131.215 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)
121 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)
94.153 Points -28%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
371 runs/min +303%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
150 runs/min +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.9 - 225, n=18)
141.6 runs/min +54%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)
137.4 runs/min +49%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)
128 runs/min +39%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro (Edge 108)
103 runs/min +12%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
92 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)
64.38 runs/min -30%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
201 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
151 Points +16%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)
142 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22)
130.6 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
130 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=153, last 2 years)
114.1 Points -12%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro (Edge 108)
106 Points -18%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
288 Points +43%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
201 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (115 - 238, n=11)
197.5 Points -2%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)
195 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points -26%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)
137 Points -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
72024 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
60423 Points +42%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro (Edge 108)
54773 Points +29%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)
53898 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25)
45827 Points +8%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
42421 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37278 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)
30884 Points -27%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)
1563 ms * -70%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)
1323.4 ms * -44%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro (Edge 108)
1290.8 ms * -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22)
1023 ms * -11%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
918.6 ms *
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)
874.2 ms * +5%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
699 ms * +24%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
469.9 ms * +49%

* ... smaller is better

快速的LPDDR5X内存帮助华硕智能手机实现了出色的读写性能率，从对比设备来看，只有努比亚RedMagic 8 Pro能与之媲美。4KB的随机读/写也特别强。

Asus ROG Phone 7 UltimateAsus ROG Phone 6 ProNubia RedMagic 8 ProSamsung Galaxy S23+Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProXiaomi Poco F4 GTAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-37%
-6%
-37%
-36%
-37%
-7%
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB
3429.17
1949.16
-43%
3556.62
4%
3250.14
-5%
1945.4
-43%
1832.34
-47%
3618 ?(1851 - 4512, n=32)
6%
1847 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years)
-46%
Sequential Write 256KB
3061.82
1454.5
-52%
2719.64
-11%
1014.33
-67%
1485.2
-51%
1482.42
-52%
2973 ?(1524 - 3678, n=32)
-3%
1436 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years)
-53%
Random Read 4KB
450.1
297.48
-34%
393.88
-12%
441.77
-2%
344.9
-23%
328.58
-27%
392 ?(250 - 480, n=32)
-13%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years)
-38%
Random Write 4KB
572.05
459.66
-20%
551.93
-4%
156.82
-73%
424.8
-26%
457.69
-20%
463 ?(45.7 - 709, n=32)
-19%
308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years)
-46%

游戏--保证最大的性能

游戏可以通过Game Genie为ROG Phone 7 Ultimate进行优化。通过从左上角或右上角向屏幕中心滑动，可以激活游戏中的覆盖层。

除了宏录制、"请勿打扰 "模式和FPS计数器等实用功能外，你还可以通过Game Genie调整AirTrigger。要做到这一点，你把L和R图标拖到游戏用户界面的控制上，如武器更换或菜单按钮，然后通过超声波按钮直接操作。对于一些游戏，如《使命召唤》移动版、《元神冲击》和《PUBG》移动版，华硕提供了预定义的AirTrigger预设，这样你就不需要手动分配按键了。

Game Genie还支持按键映射，只要你将ROG Kunai Gamepad 3或另一个支持的控制器（PS4、XBOX One、XBOX Series X或Stadia）连接到智能手机上，这项功能就会被激活。然后，屏幕上的控制可以分配给输入设备上的按钮，使您可以直接用相应的控制器玩游戏。

作为游戏加速器的X模式

ROG Phone 7 Ultimate可以在不同的性能模式下运行，可以在Game Genie或Armory Crate应用程序中选择。最强的性能模式被称为X模式（当AeroActive Cooler 7停靠时称为X模式+），也可以直接通过通知屏幕激活。

在X模式下，CPU、GPU和RAM的性能设置都是最大的，我们也在该模式下进行了基准测试。默认情况下，在主屏幕上，时间旁边的左上角会出现一个橙色的X图标。其他性能模式是动态 （日常使用的平衡设置）和省电模式超耐用。你还可以自定义每种模式的性能设置。

所有重要的游戏设置都可以通过游戏中的覆盖物Game Genie进行调整。
所有重要的游戏设置都可以通过游戏中的覆盖物Game Genie进行调整。
AirTriggers可以被配置为取代游戏用户界面中的控制。
AirTriggers可以被配置为取代游戏用户界面中的控制。

在我们的Gamebench 基准测试中，华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate证明了它可以在最大的细节下流畅地渲染游戏，并且在永久负载下不会出汗--所有这些都没有外部风扇。因此，在冷却方面仍有相当多的储备，但智能手机并不真正需要它们，至少对于当前的游戏一代来说是如此。

PUBG手机在ROG Phone 7 Ultimate上以最大的可选择的超高清/超清 设置运行，每秒持续40帧。然而，无论我们选择多高或多低的细节级别，都无法说服游戏平均输出超过60帧。另一方面，帧率几乎保持在每秒60帧，即使在HDR/Extreme等高端设置下也是如此。我们用Armajet得到同样的结果。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø60.9 (60-62)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.5.0: Ø60 (56-71)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.5.0: Ø59.9 (59-61)

排放--高效冷却和外部重低音扬声器

温度

有效的冷却对于游戏智能手机来说特别重要。毕竟，这类设备应该在长时间的游戏过程中提供持续的高性能，并且在手中总是感觉到舒适的冷却。华硕为ROG Phone 7 Ultimate做了这方面的功课，因为即使经过1小时的压力测试，表面温度也没有超过30.7℃。华硕的 ROG Phone 6 Pro相比之下，最高达到了37℃。

华硕延续了上一代产品的冷却机制，即SoC被置于机箱的中心位置，从而围绕着两个3000毫安时的电池。这种设计的好处是，不仅包括AeroActive Cooler 7可以直接放置在处理器上方，而且由于其中心位置，SoC的热量也可以均匀地散布到各个角落和侧面。

ROG Phone 7 Ultimate在测试中取得了非常好的冷却值，即使没有可安装的风扇。在3DMark压力测试中，它在相对较长的时间内提供持续的高帧率。

华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的冷却系统一目了然。
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的冷却系统一目了然。
Max. Load
 29.5 °C30.7 °C29.4 °C 
 29.8 °C30.5 °C29.4 °C 
 28.9 °C29.5 °C28.5 °C 
Maximum: 30.7 °C
Average: 29.6 °C
28.5 °C29.4 °C29.3 °C
28.1 °C29.3 °C29 °C
28.2 °C29 °C28.6 °C
Maximum: 29.4 °C
Average: 28.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.8 % +9%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.2 % +4%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.8 %
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
80.1 % -13%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.6 % -42%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50.4 % -45%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % +3%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98.2 % +2%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
96.3 %
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
66.7 % -31%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.8 % -40%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46.2 % -52%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø22.4 (21.7-22.6)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø14.4 (13.4-20.1)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; with Fan: Ø16.7 (16.6-16.7)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø22 (22-22.4)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.3 (13.4-23.1)
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø9.07 (7.07-15.3)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø80.2 (74.6-81.2)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø50.6 (47.5-59.3)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; without Fan: Ø61.5 (59.8-62.8)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø81.1 (81-81.2)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.7 (43-80.2)
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø30.1 (27.7-54.9)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø55.3 (50.8-74)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; with Fan: Ø65.7 (65.6-66.1)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø83.9 (83.9-84)
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate

发言人

ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的立体声扬声器以平衡的声音给人留下深刻印象，其中甚至连低音都没有被忽视。通过连接外部AeroActive Cooler 7风扇，声音可以得到进一步改善，它包含一个重低音扬声器，华硕用它来为智能手机产生真正丰富的音质。

外部音频设备可以通过非常低噪音的3.5毫米音频插孔（信噪比：100.74 dBFS）或蓝牙5.2连接到智能手机。所有常见的蓝牙编解码器，如SBC和LC3、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive和LDAC都得到支持。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.634.52530343124.5334025.838.15037.543.66325.238.98020.24210020.445.712517.554.716014.459.720014.359.725015.258.831511.966.140013.568.250012.174.763012.474.580011.775.3100011.879.4125011.479.1160012.380.7200012.280.2250012.181.3315012.280.2400012.980.8500013.478.7630013.276.1800012.970.71000013.669.31250013.472.31600013.258.1SPL24.890.7N0.687median 12.9median 74.7Delta0.98.239.242.133.939273032.428.1363230.928.319.429.519.939.115.544.615.949.912.350.312.955.712.957.49.960.210.266.313.468.61773.814.275.512.87711.776.610.276.411.676.113731574.31673.914.669.615.270.815.970.916.368.316.652.726.286.20.765.9median 14.2median 69.61.98.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Phone 7 UltimateXiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 6000毫安时的电池确保了长时间的运行。

消耗功率

ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的特点是节俭的能源消耗，有时满足于比对比设备少得多的电力。

6000毫安时（2x3000毫安时）的电池可以用高达65瓦的功率充电。在测试中，使用附带的电源将电池从0充到100%大约需要43分钟。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.75 / 0.85 / 1.14 Watt
Load midlight 3.52 / 6.01 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
6000 mAh		Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
4323 mAh		Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
6000 mAh		Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
6000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23+
4700 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
4700 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-28%
-21%
-44%
0%
-42%
-79%
-56%
Idle Minimum *
0.75
0.61
19%
0.8
-7%
0.89
-19%
0.64
15%
1
-33%
1.036 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=23)
-38%
0.893 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=154, last 2 years)
-19%
Idle Average *
0.85
1.7
-100%
1.31
-54%
1.98
-133%
0.88
-4%
1.53
-80%
1.766 ?(0.8 - 7.18, n=23)
-108%
1.449 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=154, last 2 years)
-70%
Idle Maximum *
1.14
1.73
-52%
1.36
-19%
2.04
-79%
0.94
18%
1.57
-38%
1.94 ?(1.07 - 8.22, n=23)
-70%
1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=154, last 2 years)
-41%
Load Average *
3.52
3.85
-9%
3.77
-7%
3.13
11%
4.18
-19%
4.39
-25%
7.22 ?(2.61 - 15.3, n=23)
-105%
6.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=149, last 2 years)
-85%
Load Maximum *
6.01
5.94
1%
7.04
-17%
6.01
-0%
6.59
-10%
8.1
-35%
10.4 ?(4.57 - 18.1, n=23)
-73%
9.87 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=149, last 2 years)
-64%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.55 (1.025-10.8)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.09 (1.072-17.3)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.63 (0.82-14.8)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.925 (0.66-1.237)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2; active fan: Ø1.435 (1.388-1.574)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.265 (1.221-1.341)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.746 (0.695-0.926)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.72 (9.34-10.1)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.4 (11.2-13.4)
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.925 (0.66-1.237)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2; active fan: Ø1.435 (1.388-1.574)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.265 (1.221-1.341)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.746 (0.695-0.926)

电池寿命

在电池寿命方面，由于其大电池和不显眼的功耗，华硕智能手机没有显示任何弱点。大约17.5小时的模拟网络冲浪和近26小时的视频播放是非常好的数值，与那些 三星Galaxy S23+然而，后者的电池要小得多。但是，ROG Phone 7 Ultimate不能完全与 Apple的iPhone 14 Pro Max.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
40h 48min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 111)
17h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
25h 54min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 52min
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
6000 mAh		Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
4323 mAh		Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
6000 mAh		Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
6000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23+
4700 mAh		Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
4650 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
4700 mAh
Battery Runtime
11%
4%
7%
3%
-28%
-39%
Reader / Idle
2448
3473
42%
2585
6%
1562
-36%
H.264
1554
1688
9%
1524
-2%
992
-36%
WiFi v1.3
1050
948
-10%
1097
4%
1120
7%
1196
14%
752
-28%
747
-29%
Load
412
416
1%
385
-7%
189
-54%

Pros

+ 非常高和稳定的性能
+ 非常明亮的AMOLED显示屏，165赫兹
+ 快速的WiFi 6E
+ 非常好的电池寿命
+ 交货范围内包括可安装的风扇
+ 强大的扬声器和外部低音炮

Cons

- 只有2年的操作系统升级
- 沉重
- 没有无线充电

结论：华硕的游戏智能手机变得更加出色

在审查中：华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate。测试单位由德国华硕提供。
在审查中：华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate。测试单位由德国华硕提供。

华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate是目前最好的游戏智能手机。与其强大的前辈相比，它一直在进一步发展，通过改用 骁龙8代2。同时，由于冷却系统的改进，热量排放也大大减少。

可安装的风扇，以前只是一个选项，现在是华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的标准配件。同时，AeroActive Cooler 7中还集成了一个低音炮，帮助智能手机产生强烈的声音效果。

华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate是一场游戏玩家的盛宴，并以毫不妥协的性能获得分数。

ROG Phone 6 Pro的AirTrigger超声波传感器 ROG Phone 6 Pro也是ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的一部分。明亮的AMOLED显示屏也是如此，它不仅以高达165赫兹的刷新率和720赫兹的采样率快速反应，还以极其流畅的操作给人留下深刻印象。同时，华硕还进一步提高了屏幕亮度，从而帮助这台6.78英寸的手机实现了平均四位数的亮度值，峰值超过1600尼特。

华硕的游戏手机几乎没有什么可以批评的地方。ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的价格约为1500美元，在你的钱包里撕开一个大洞。尽管采用了索尼IMX766传感器，但其5000万像素的摄像头也只是一般。这一点更值得注意，因为这款智能手机的所有其他部件几乎都是高端产品。另外，令人遗憾的是，只有2年的操作系统升级，而且不支持无线充电。

华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的替代品是华硕ROG Phone 6 Pro、Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro。努比亚RedMagic 8 Pro和 小米黑鲨5 Pro.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

目前，华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的全球供应量有限。根据网上的信息，这款智能手机在欧洲、中国和台湾的一些地区通过华硕的网站接受预购。4月中旬开始发货，但似乎这款智能手机还没有到达世界某些地区的市场，如美洲。

我们的发现显示，华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate在UK(1199.99英镑),法国(1429,00欧元)和德国(1.399,00€).当然，这个名单并不详尽--建议其他国家的感兴趣的买家直接通过华硕的网站（如适用）或通过授权经销商查询。

价格截止到2023年5月1日，可能会有变化。

Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate - 04/27/2023 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
99%
Connectivity
76 / 70 → 100%
Weight
87%
Battery
93%
Display
93%
Games Performance
79 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
95 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
85 / 90 → 94%
Camera
71%
Average
87%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕ROG手机7终极版揭秘：目前最好的游戏智能手机
Manuel Masiero, 2023-05- 2 (Update: 2024-08-15)