努比亚红魔 9 Pro 评测--速度惊人、设计时尚的游戏手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.8 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 | 229 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" | 2480x1116 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 228 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" | 2480x1116 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 204 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 3200x1440 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 | 225 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能 - 无缝观看体验
努比亚红魔 9 Pro 的外观棱角分明,让人想起前代产品的设计。该设备非常平衡,尽管相当重,但手感很好。它有 Sleet(黑色)、Cyclone(半透明背面)和 Snowfall(银白色)三种配色可供选择。
我们喜欢 9 Pro 的制造质量:手机上的所有缝隙都很小而且均匀。它再次采用了无缝显示屏,前置摄像头隐藏在面板下方。同时,显示屏下方的摄像头几乎看不见,只有在光线照射到显示屏的特定角度才能找到。后置摄像头与手机机身齐平--这在当今并不多见。它们同样被一块不明玻璃所覆盖。
这款游戏手机没有任何 IP 认证,但密封的 SIM 卡插槽表明至少有一些基本的防水溅保护。
在功能方面,这款手机与前代产品类似。在手机右侧,你会再次看到两个触摸式专用触发器。它们提供了良好的触觉反馈,在游戏过程中感觉非常灵敏。
集成的 USB 端口不仅能提供很高的数据传输速度(拷贝测试:635.9 MB/s),还支持通过线缆进行视频输出。这意味着您可以轻松镜像屏幕或加载桌面版 RedMagic Game Space(最高全高清和 144Hz)。
连接、软件和操作
努比亚红魔 9 Pro 支持所有常规移动通信标准,频率覆盖范围广。通过 Wi-Fi 7 以及 5.0 GHz 和 6.0 GHz 两个频率范围,无线局域网连接非常迅速和稳定。
只要将手机贴在耳边,就能获得不错的语音质量。不过,噪音抑制效果一般,RedMagic 在扬声器模式下听起来略有回音。
操作系统方面,该手机配备了Android 14 和努比亚的 RedMagic OS 9.0 定制 UI。在审查时,安全补丁的日期是 2023 年 11 月 1 日,因此不再是完全最新的。根据经验,更新只会零星推出。努比亚只承诺提供一次重大更新和两年的安全补丁。
生物识别安全由显示屏内的光学指纹扫描仪处理,该扫描仪工作正常,还能测量心率。此外,您还可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别,但这种方法的安全性较低。
除了两个额外的电容式肩部触发器外,边框上还有一个醒目的红色按钮,可以让你切换到手机上的特殊游戏界面:RedMagic Game Space。通过它,用户可以自定义各个游戏的设置,并管理任何配对的配件。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
摄像头:双摄像头更好,前置摄像头较弱
前置摄像头没有什么变化。显示屏下方的摄像头具有美颜模式,但即使禁用该功能,图像看起来仍然浑浊且缺乏细节。在弱光环境下,照片的噪点也会很快变多。
现在的主摄像头模块比上一代产品少了一个镜头。广角传感器与 红魔 8S Pro但现在具有光学图像稳定(OIS)功能。第二个镜头也有 5000 万像素,可用于拍摄超广角和微距图像。虽然没有光学变焦,但该手机能够实现高达 10 倍的数码变焦。使用 RedMagic 9 Pro 拍摄的照片具有不错的细节,但看起来有些冲淡和暗淡。
主摄像头可以录制高达 8K(30 帧/秒)的视频,前置摄像头可以录制全高清(30 帧/秒)视频。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light显示屏 - RedMagic 9 Pro 采用明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏
就一般规格而言,RedMagic 9 Pro 的显示屏与上一代产品相比没有变化:它是一块 6.8 英寸全高清+面板,刷新率高达 120Hz。不过,色彩准确度和亮度得到了进一步提高。
在启用环境光传感器后,AMOLED 显示屏的平均峰值亮度达到 1,031 cd/m²,同时显示完全白色的图像。当亮区和暗区均匀分布时(APL 18),面板亮度甚至达到了 1,242 cd/m²。在播放 HDR 时也达到了类似的水平。显示屏的手动最大亮度为 589 cd/m²。
与所有 OLED 面板一样,RedMagic 9 Pro 的屏幕也无法避免闪烁现象。不过,努比亚采用了 2160Hz 的高频 PWM 调光技术,使显示屏尽可能舒适。
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1035 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro BOE Q9+, AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8" | Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.8" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -77% | 20% | 218% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.8 ? | 2.06 ? -158% | 1.09 ? -36% | 1.18 ? -48% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.08 ? | 1.88 ? -74% | 1.13 ? -5% | 1.14 ? -6% |
PWM Frequency | 60 | 60 0% | 120.3 101% | 485 708% |
Screen | -21% | 6% | -30% | |
Brightness middle | 1035 | 775 -25% | 1002 -3% | 1699 64% |
Brightness | 1031 | 778 -25% | 1004 -3% | 1698 65% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 98 2% | 95 -1% | 98 2% |
Black Level * | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.3 -30% | 0.8 20% | 1.9 -90% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.9 | 2.4 -26% | 1.7 11% | 4.7 -147% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.9 -19% | 1.4 12% | 2.8 -75% |
Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6368 102% | 6693 97% | 6468 100% | 6648 98% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -49% /
-39% | 13% /
11% | 94% /
53% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.539 ms rise | |
↘ 0.5365 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4015 ms rise | |
↘ 0.401 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命
努比亚红魔 9 Pro 是全球首批搭载 高通骁龙 8 代 3.内置风扇的运行噪音(最大 39 dB(A))甚至低于 8S Pro。 8S Pro内置风扇的运行噪音比 8S Pro 更低(最大 39 分贝(A)),使手机能够在大部分时间内保持处理器在峰值性能下稳定运行。
在浏览器基准测试中,我们注意到 RedMagic 手机和 Chrome 浏览器的配合并不默契。在使用谷歌浏览器时,结果出奇的差。而当我们使用微软 Edge 浏览器时,情况就不同了。
我们运行了 Burnout 基准测试(CPU + GPU)来模拟高负荷运行。大约十分钟后,RedMagic 9 Pro 就崩溃了,需要重新启动。尽管有风扇,但设备还是过热了。因此,在仅启用 CPU 负载的情况下进行了后续测量。即便如此,游戏手机还是变得非常热。
RedMagic 9 Pro 的两个扬声器音量非常大,但在中等音量下听起来已经很刺耳和空洞。
努比亚手机真正的亮点在于电池续航时间。它的电池容量高达 6,500 毫安时,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中可以持续使用 17 个小时。
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120) | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120) | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84) | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro (Chrome 120.0.6099.115) | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120) | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro (Edge 115) | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro (Chrome 115) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=19) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) |
Basemark GPUScore
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | -42% | -3% | -16% | -51% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 4164.08 | 3576.35 -14% | 1876.8 -55% | 4016.67 -4% | 3622 ? -13% | 1839 ? -56% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 3199.98 | 2682.03 -16% | 1773.94 -45% | 3153.4 -1% | 2956 ? -8% | 1425 ? -55% |
Random Read 4KB | 442.82 | 369.76 -16% | 342.04 -23% | 434.63 -2% | 392 ? -11% | 277 ? -37% |
Random Write 4KB | 691.17 | 479.52 -31% | 372.35 -46% | 648 -6% | 475 ? -31% | 309 ? -55% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.1 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro |
Pros
Cons
判决
努比亚红魔 9 Pro 与前代产品 8S Pro 相比略有进步。 8S Pro.可配置的 LED 灯和额外的肩部按键等熟悉的亮点再次登场,且基本保持不变。除了采用最新的高通 SoC 外,这款游戏手机还提供了更亮的显示屏、更安静的风扇和更大的电池。新的摄像头设置也得到了改进。此外,这款手机现在的充电功率可达 80 瓦。
RedMagic 9 Pro 是一款功能强大、价格便宜的游戏手机。但它会变得非常热。
虽然风扇现在能更安静地运转是件好事,但在我们的压力测试中,散热解决方案还不足以防止手机关机。努比亚最好能稍微降低 SoC 的运行速度,而不是一味追求高性能。虽然游戏时过热不是问题,但表面温度可能会很高。
此外,该机还缺少一些功能,如无线充电和 IP 认证,鉴于产品的重点,这两项功能都可以忽略不计。不过,这个价位的设备应该支持 eSIM 卡。
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 是 RedMagic 9 Pro 最强劲的竞争对手。如果你主要关注的是性能,其他高端智能手机可能同样是你的不错选择,尤其是努比亚 Z60 Ultra。
价格和供应情况
努比亚红魔 9 Pro 有三种配置可供选择:
颜色 | 内存/存储 | 价格 (RRP) |
---|---|---|
Sleet | 12/256 GB | 649 欧元/649 美元 |
旋风 | 16/512 GB | €799/US$799 |
Snowfall | 16/512 GB | €799/US$799 |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
- 02/05/2024 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.