AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX首次亮相。雷蛇Blade 14笔记本电脑评测
现在差不多一年了,2021年的刀锋14可以在今天发布,它仍然是目前大多数(如果不是所有)14英寸笔记本电脑的顶峰。它的AMD Zen 3 Ryzen 9 5900HX CPU和GeForce RTX 3070/3080显卡在笔记本游戏领域毫不逊色,但今年的更新进一步提高了性能,采用了更新的Zen 3+ Ryzen 5900HX CPU,更快的内存,以及GeForce RTX 3070 Ti和3080 Ti显卡选项。
配置从2000美元开始,GeForce RTX 3060 和144 Hz FHD显示器,到3500美元,RTX 3080 Ti 和165 Hz QHD显示器。所有SKU都配备了相同的Ryzen 9 6900HX CPU,100W TGP目标,16GB DDR5-4800焊接内存和1TB PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD。我们的审查单位是中间选项,配备RTX 3070 Ti和165 Hz QHD显示器,零售价约为2700美元。
刀片14的直接竞争对手是华硕Zephyrus G14系列。然而,由于14英寸游戏笔记本很少,我们也将把Blade 14与更多传统尺寸的15.6英寸或更大的型号进行比较,如微星Stealth GS66或联想Legion C7.
更多Razer评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2021 | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
91.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
86.7 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800S | 1.7 kg | 19.5 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
84.5 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 20.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
箱子 - 小尺寸的经典Razer产品
机箱仍然与去年的版本相同,因为2022年的版本只是内部性能更新。然而,一年前的设计仍然感觉很新鲜,特别是由于14英寸游戏空间的竞争仍然稀少。它仍然比 Zephyrus G14有明显的优势,而重量也差不多,感觉更密实。当然,雷蛇用户将放弃华硕独特的AniMe Matrix LED功能,而选择更薄、更平滑的一体式结构。
我们对高端超极本所期待的一些基本功能,如指纹识别器或网络摄像头快门,仍然没有。
连接性 - 没有雷电或Razer核心的兼容性
沟通
无线技术已经从杀手AX1690i换成了高通WCN685x。然而,两者都能达到Wi-Fi 6E的速度,因此这一变化更像是一个侧面的步骤,而不是一个全面的升级。
网络摄像头
相机已经从去年的720p升级到今年的1080p,以获得更清晰的画面。
维护
拆下底板显示出与2021年的Blade 14几乎相同的布局。但请注意,这次的风扇略有不同,但其他方面的直径是一样的。
配件和保修
盒子里有一些雷蛇的标志贴纸,还有常见的交流适配器和文件。至于保修,雷蛇在笔记本的标准一年有限保修的基础上,为每一个新购买的电池引入了两年的保护。
输入设备 - 感觉就像在超极本上打字一样
显示屏 - QHD,所有的钟声和口哨声
我们2022年的测试设备上的1440p IPS面板是TL140BDXP02-2,而我们2021年的设备是TL140BDXP02-0。其他一切都在它们之间几乎是相同的,基本上是同比的观看体验。这仍然是目前市场上唯一的14英寸机型之一,它具有原生165赫兹刷新率、FreeSync Premium、完整的DCI-P3覆盖率和快速响应时间。
值得注意的是 最新的华硕Zephyrus G14型号已经转移到16:10,而刀片14仍然是16:9。然而,与Razer不同的是,华硕型号没有165赫兹的选项。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 354 cd/m²
Contrast: 957:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.66 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX TL140BDXP02-0, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 TL140BDXP02-2, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti BOE NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK NE140QDM-NX1 (BOE0A1D), IPS-Level, 2560x1600, 14" | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS AU Optronics B156ZAN05.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 1% | 0% | -0% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.2 | 97.2 0% | 98.7 2% | 97.4 0% | 96.4 -1% | 89.1 -8% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.7 | 85.4 0% | 86.2 1% | 85.5 0% | 85.6 0% | 99.1 16% |
Response Times | 16% | 10% | 55% | 55% | 42% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.8 ? | 16.4 ? 2% | 17.6 ? -5% | 8.8 ? 48% | 6 ? 64% | 8.2 ? 51% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.2 ? | 10.8 ? 29% | 11.4 ? 25% | 6 ? 61% | 8.4 ? 45% | 10.4 ? 32% |
PWM Frequency | 27170 ? | |||||
Screen | -8% | -18% | -32% | -72% | -41% | |
Brightness middle | 354 | 331.1 -6% | 335.9 -5% | 480 36% | 272 -23% | 406 15% |
Brightness | 328 | 318 -3% | 294 -10% | 456 39% | 253 -23% | 407 24% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 75 -13% | 80 -7% | 87 1% | 88 2% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.36 3% | 0.38 -3% | 0.48 -30% | 0.25 32% | 0.42 -14% |
Contrast | 957 | 920 -4% | 884 -8% | 1000 4% | 1088 14% | 967 1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.66 | 2.25 -36% | 2.82 -70% | 2.62 -58% | 3.73 -125% | 4.36 -163% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.83 | 4.62 -21% | 5.04 -32% | 6.71 -75% | 9.43 -146% | 7.55 -97% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.7 -6% | 1.7 -6% | 4.2 -163% | 6.5 -306% | 3.1 -94% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.3 96% | 2.14 103% | 2.16 102% | 2.172 101% | 2.36 93% |
CCT | 6542 99% | 6751 96% | 6382 102% | 7122 91% | 6485 100% | 6371 102% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.12 | 0.98 | 3.63 | |||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 86.7 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.9 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-3% | -2% /
-10% | 8% /
-11% | -6% /
-36% | 1% /
-18% |
* ... smaller is better
用我们的X-Rite色度计进行的独立测量显示,QUD 2021 Blade 14和QUD 2022 Blade 14的色彩空间几乎相同,约为DCI-P3的97%。然而,在默认情况下,显示器似乎被设置为sRGB,而不是DCI-P3,没有明确的方法来切换到DCI-P3。相比之下,最初的2021型号默认设置为DCI-P3。如果我们成功地将颜色配置文件从sRGB切换到DCI-P3,我们将更新这部分的评论。雷蛇宣传其FHD SKU和QHD SKU分别完全覆盖sRGB和DCI-P3。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 6.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - Ryzen 9 6900HX首次亮相
测试条件
在运行以下任何性能基准测试之前,我们的设备通过Windows设置为性能模式,并通过Synapse将CPU和GPU分别设置为Boost和High。我们建议用户熟悉Synapse软件,因为许多关键功能是在这里切换的,包括视频刷新率和Optimus与独立显卡之间的MUX切换。相比之下,2021年的Blade 14 Synapse软件缺乏MUX开关选项。
处理器 - 明显的单线程性能提升
我们在2021年刀片14的评论中指出,相对于其他H系列CPU,单线程性能令人失望。值得庆幸的是,较新的 Ryzen 9 6900HX解决了这些问题,单线程和多线程性能分别比上一代提升了约30%和10%。 Ryzen 9 5900HX对应的产品。原始多线程性能与第12代酷睿i7-12800HX相比,在个位数百分点之内。 酷睿i7-12800H在较大的 刀片17.简而言之,Blade 14确实可以提供与 "常规尺寸 "游戏笔记本电脑类似的CPU性能水平。
Ryzen 9 6900HX在较大的机箱上可能运行得更快。15.6英寸的 华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS配有较早的Ryzen 9 5900HX,例如,在处理器性能方面与我们较小的Blade 14不相上下。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1523 - 1652, n=21) | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Eluktronics RP-15 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Corsair One i300 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (12.6 - 18.7, n=20) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (10950 - 17963, n=20) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (71414 - 110797, n=20) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (2471 - 3804, n=20) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (84185 - 107544, n=20) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (10970 - 13205, n=20) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (39164 - 61370, n=20) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (54613 - 142360, n=20) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (578 - 911, n=20) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5798 - 9540, n=20) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (26873 - 30604, n=20) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
系统性能
PCMark结果比去年的型号略微快了几个百分点。更值得注意的是,分数与许多大型游戏笔记本电脑相当,包括 微星GE76系列.
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7161 - 7332, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10431 - 10934, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9043 - 9960, n=3) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9351 - 10817, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
PCMark 10 Score | 7332 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (47938 - 53345, n=20) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (43892 - 53321, n=20) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (51085 - 57202, n=20) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (80.7 - 120.6, n=20) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时没有DPC问题。然而,在运行Prime95以强调CPU时,可能会出现延迟峰值。在60FPS下的4K视频播放很流畅,没有丢帧。CPU和GPU的利用率会非常低,分别只有3%和7%。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 现在有了PCIe4 x4支持
我们对2021年刀片14的主要抱怨之一已经在2022年型号上得到解决。用户现在可以配置更快的PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘,而不是局限于PCIe3 x4速度。从我们的连续读取率 三星PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR可以达到超过6600MB/s的持续速度,而去年的三星PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR的持续速度约为3500MB/s。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--升级不多
性能跃升来自 GeForce RTX 3070到2021年刀片14中的 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti在我们的2022型号中的性能跳跃是轻微到中等的,取决于游戏和分辨率设置。如果在较低的图形设置下,2022模型上的游戏运行速度可以达到30%至40%,而在原生1440p分辨率下的较高设置将看到更小的优势,低于10%。赛博朋克2077》就是一个很好的例子,会出现这种情况。我们怀疑Ryzen 9 5900HX的单线程CPU性能的显著提升是在CPU约束的情况下帧率更快的原因,而2022型号更快的DDR5-4800内存在高分辨率下游戏时比旧的2021型号中更慢的DDR4-3200内存贡献更大。
根据3DMark基准测试,移动RTX 3070和移动RTX 3070 Ti之间的差异相对较小,尽管在某些分辨率上运行实际游戏时,可以观察到较大的性能余量。这表明,今年的Blade 14上更快的CPU和内存对GPU的瓶颈作用较小。
目标TGP继续被限制在100W,这是性能尺度的低端。微星 MSI Vector GP66例如,微星Vector GP66配备了与我们的2022年Blade 14相同的RTX 3070 Ti GPU,但其TGP目标更高,为150 W,图形性能提高了15%至20%。
在平衡配置文件而不是最高性能配置文件上运行将对CPU和GPU的性能产生大约6%的影响。
3DMark 11 Performance | 28006 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 60242 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23725 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 9638 points | |
Help |
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (157 - 160, n=2) | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (102 - 111, n=3) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (85 - 94, n=4) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (73 - 80, n=4) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (56 - 62, n=3) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 178.4 | 173.1 | 158.4 | 93 | 89.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 386.2 | 300.4 | 187.5 | 95.2 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 145.6 | 131.1 | 126 | 120.5 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 177.1 | 128.9 | 98.1 | 74.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 114.9 | 100.8 | 81.7 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 141 | 123 | 116 | 110 | 94 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 393 | 254 | 202 | 177.4 | 130 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 129.3 | 108.6 | 86 | 86 | 45.2 |
排放
系统噪音 - 没有预期的那么响亮
风扇噪音与我们在2021年型号上记录的情况并无不同。我们建议在浏览或视频流时将系统运行在静音或平衡模式下,以获得更安静的体验。当在高性能模式下玩游戏时,风扇噪音将稳定在42 dB(A)左右,与Zephyrus G14或微星GS66相似。 微星GS66在类似的条件下。
有趣的是,即使在高性能模式下运行Prime95和FurMark,我们也无法达到去年型号上观察到的50多分贝(A)的最大范围。这并不是说较新的型号不可能有这么大的噪音,但在大多数情况下,用户不太可能达到这么高的风扇噪音水平。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.3 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 34.7 / 42.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A) |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | -9% | -13% | -25% | -12% | |
off / environment * | 23.3 | 25.1 -8% | 23.3 -0% | 24 -3% | 24 -3% | 27 -16% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.3 | 25.2 -8% | 23.3 -0% | 24 -3% | 31 -33% | 27 -16% |
Idle Average * | 23.3 | 25.2 -8% | 23.3 -0% | 26 -12% | 32 -37% | 27 -16% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.3 | 25.2 -8% | 26.3 -13% | 31 -33% | 35 -50% | 27 -16% |
Load Average * | 34.7 | 31 11% | 38.2 -10% | 45 -30% | 48 -38% | 31.2 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.1 | 44 -5% | 50.9 -21% | 43 -2% | 43 -2% | 44.5 -6% |
Load Maximum * | 42.1 | 51.7 -23% | 49.1 -17% | 45 -7% | 48 -14% | 53.5 -27% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使只是在桌面上空转,没有运行任何苛刻的应用程序,表面温度仍然非常高。一个典型的14英寸超极本,如 华硕Zenbook 14 UX425EA在桌面上空转时,其顶部和底部的温度仅为27摄氏度,而我们的Blade 14则为37摄氏度。它没有热到让人感到不适,但在手掌或腿上肯定是明显的。
运行更高的负载,如游戏,将诱发45℃左右的热点,与上述的Zenbook 14相似,尽管它们有巨大的性能差异。最值得注意的是,在类似的游戏条件下,竞争者Zephyrus G14的运行温度甚至可以超过我们的Razer,高达54℃。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.9 °C / -5.2 F).
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -6% | -7% | -3% | 9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 40.6 | 46 -13% | 55 -35% | 54 -33% | 33.4 18% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.6 | 46.8 -10% | 55 -29% | 59 -38% | 45 -6% |
Idle Upper Side * | 38 | 36.2 5% | 30 21% | 26 32% | 30.8 19% |
Idle Bottom * | 37 | 38.6 -4% | 32 14% | 27 27% | 35.4 4% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,时钟速率将稳定在4.0至4.2GHz左右,并且在非常温暖的核心温度下接近93℃,以接近我们在2021年配备旧版Ryzen 9 5900HX的Blade 14上记录的情况。然而,这次的CPU封装功率较高,在测试开始时为90W,然后稳定在75W,而2021年的型号上为77W和53W。很明显,CPU在这里通过尽可能快地运行,同时保持在100℃以下,充分利用了小机箱的尺寸。
运行 Witcher 3在最大性能模式下,GPU时钟、内存时钟和主板功耗分别为1350 MHz、1500 MHz和101 W,而在平衡模式下运行则为1275 MHz、1375 MHz和89 W。因此,如果用户想从笔记本电脑中获得最大的性能,他们将希望通过Synapse软件启用最大性能。在装有相同RTX 3070 Ti GPU的更大的微星Vector GP66上运行同样的测试,会看到更高的GPU和内存时钟速率,分别为1650 MHz和1750 MHz,因为它的TGP目标更高。
在运行同样的测试时,CPU和GPU的核心温度分别比Zephyrus G14的温度高(81℃对74℃)和低(69℃对77℃)。 Witcher 3测试。
用电池供电运行将限制性能。在电池上运行Fire Strike ,物理学和图形学得分分别为14253和5173分,而在主电源上则为26044和26398分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度Tctl/Tdie(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 49 | 44 |
Prime95压力 | 4.0 - 4.2 | -- | 93 | 52 |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 3.7 | 780 | 93 | 68 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡功率曲线) | 2.2 | 1275 | 77 | 69 |
Witcher 3 压力(最高性能功率曲线) | 2.4 | 1350 | 81 | 69 |
发言人
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量 - 对于14英寸的笔记本电脑来说非常高
CPU和GPU性能的小幅提升是以运行高要求负载时功耗的小幅提升为代价的。我们能够记录到228瓦的较高最大消耗量,而去年的型号只有190瓦,表明这次的涡轮增压性能更好,即使它只持续了几秒钟。
与配备Ryzen 9 6900HS和Radeon RX 6800S的竞争产品Zephyrus G14 GA402R相比,Razer在大多数情况下要求稍高,尽管它们之间的原始CPU和GPU性能相似。
中小型(约17 x 7 x 2.5厘米)的230瓦交流适配器同比没有变化。
Off / Standby | 0.64 / 4.3 Watt |
Idle | 10.2 / 26 / 26.7 Watt |
Load |
89.3 / 227.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800S, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK, IPS-Level, 2560x1600, 14" | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 15% | -81% | 19% | 4% | -21% | |
Idle Minimum * | 10.2 | 9.4 8% | 29.8 -192% | 7 31% | 11 -8% | 16.3 -60% |
Idle Average * | 26 | 15.8 39% | 37.1 -43% | 14 46% | 16 38% | 22.5 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.7 | 24.1 10% | 60.8 -128% | 22 18% | 23 14% | 39.9 -49% |
Load Average * | 89.3 | 76.8 14% | 135.3 -52% | 98 -10% | 110 -23% | 116.1 -30% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 158.7 | 154 3% | 243 -53% | 141 11% | 151 5% | 181.2 -14% |
Load Maximum * | 227.5 | 189.7 17% | 273.1 -20% | 188 17% | 230 -1% | 196.7 14% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
WLAN运行时间比我们在2021年机型上记录的时间长几个小时,当时两者都设置为60赫兹Optimus图形设置下的相同平衡电源配置文件。9.5小时的运行时间几乎与我们在最新的Zephyrus G14上的记录完全相同,尽管Razer的电池容量较小(62Wh对76Wh)。
使用附带的桶式交流电适配器,从空电到满电仍然需要大约90分钟。该系统还可以通过其两个USB-C端口中的任何一个,用大多数通用的USB-C充电器进行充电。
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 62 Wh | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800S, 76 Wh | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -8% | -34% | 2% | -25% | -38% | |
Reader / Idle | 732 | 828 13% | 482 -34% | 1085 48% | 467 -36% | 407 -44% |
WiFi v1.3 | 571 | 439 -23% | 330 -42% | 572 0% | 324 -43% | 315 -45% |
Load | 93 | 79 -15% | 68 -27% | 53 -43% | 96 3% | 71 -24% |
Pros
Cons
结论--小的升级,大的进步
在最初的2021年模型引起巨大轰动之后,预计2022年的更新将更多地是对一个已经令人印象深刻的机器进行小幅更新。它增加了一个更高分辨率的网络摄像头(720p到1080p),更快的CPU(Ryzen 9 5900HX到Ryzen 9 6900HX),更快的GPU(RTX 3070/3080到3070/3080 Ti),更快的内存(DDR4-3200到DDR5-4800),更快的M.2 SSD支持(PCIe3 x4到PCIe4 x4),更新的WLAN模块(杀手AX1690i到高通WCN685x),以及用于新集成Radeon 680MGPU的MUX开关。特别是在单线程处理器性能方面,这无疑是一种升级。
2022年的Blade 14是迄今为止自己最好的版本,因为所有的新变化都是在原有的2021年型号基础上的直接升级,特别是在单线程处理器性能方面。然而,越来越明显的是,GPU的100W TGP限制已经碰壁。
然而,如果游戏是你的主要工作负荷,那么2022型号不能提供太多的提升。它的GPU仍然受到100W TGP限制,因此迁移到GeForce Ti GPU最终只是一个小的升级,特别是在原生1440p分辨率下的游戏。相反,该模型需要的是将TGP上限进一步推到130多瓦的范围,以更好地开发任何未来GPU选项的潜力。不管怎么说,它仍然是一台速度极快的游戏机,可以轻松地与外面的许多大型选项相抗衡。如果16:9的长宽比是一个破坏者,那么用户可以考虑稍大的 Zephyrus G14其16:10的长宽比和非常相似的性能水平。
价格和可用性
亚马逊 目前,带有GeForce RTX 3080 Ti的高端配置正在发货,价格为3500美元。另外,用户可以直接从Razerzone.com购买。那里有多种配置可供选择。
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
- 05/06/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo