Acemagic M2A Starship 评测:采用英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 处理器和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU 的未来派飞船外观游戏 PC
已与 Tank03的时候,这家来自远东的系统制造商就已经推出了一款功能强大的游戏电脑,并因其外观和小巧而备受赞誉。在 Acemagic M2A Starship 上,该制造商也采用了类似的方法,只是设备稍大一些。作为回报,Acemagic M2A 的设计也极不寻常。不过,内部硬件采用的是 Acemagic Tank03 中使用的熟悉组件。
在顶级配置中,制造商搭配了 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H与 英伟达GeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑配备 16GB VRAM。此外,还有 32 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB 存储空间的固态硬盘。在此配置下,该设备的零售价为 1599 欧元。更便宜的配置基于 英特尔酷睿 i7-12700H和 英伟达GeForce RTX 3070 笔记本电脑或 英伟达GeForce RTX 3060 笔记本电脑已在商店中列出。但目前无法保证供货。制造商偶尔会在自己的商店中提供丰厚的折扣。因此,不妨到制造商的在线商店看看。
在这次评测中,Acemagic M2A Starship 必须在与自己公司以及 Minisforum、英特尔和 Zotac 的竞争中证明自己。我们在下表中汇总了对比设备的概况。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Memory | Weight | Height |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.7 % | 06 / 2024 | Acemagic M2A i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 32768 MB | 2.1 kg | 200 mm |
90.6 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 6600M | 32768 MB | 1.6 kg | 69.3 mm |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon i7-12700H, A770M | 32768 MB | 2 kg | 60 mm |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Acemagic Tank03 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 32768 MB | 2.2 kg | 159 mm |
v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Minisforum NUCX i7 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 16384 MB | 2.4 kg | 393 mm |
v (old) | 05 / 2022 | Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 32 MB | 1.8 kg | 62.2 mm |
外壳 - 带有 RGB 元素和显示屏的飞船外观
Acemagic M2A Starship 因其外观而具有极高的辨识度。制造商将硬件装在一个奢华的外壳中,看起来就像一艘宇宙飞船。如果您正在寻找一款外观与众不同的电脑,那么 Acemagic M2A 一定会让您爱不释手。在材料的选择上,Acemagic M2A 主要使用塑料。这并不是一个悲剧,因为银色元素与黑色塑料机箱搭配得天衣无缝。这款引人注目的微型电脑的占地面积略大于其他竞争对手。不过,Acemagic M2A Starship 并没有完全夸张。测试样品的重量略高于 2.1 千克,而巨大的 300 瓦电源则重达 1.1 千克。该设备结构坚固,具有很高的刚性。不过,如果设备温度较低,在负载情况下外壳可能会破裂,而在游戏过程中,在负载情况下外壳可能会发热。
作为视觉亮点,制造商安装了一些发光元件,可使用小工具进行控制。正面还有一个小显示屏,可显示一些系统信息。这也可以通过一个应用程序进行自定义。但这还不是全部,在显示屏下方的中间位置还有一个小灯,可以将 Acemagic 的标志投射到桌面上。
功能 - 多个端口,可连接 USB4
Acemagic M2A Starship 提供足够数量的外部接口。总共有六个 USB-A 接口和一个额外的 USB4 接口,可通过扩展坞等提供更多接口。有两个 HDMI 输出和一个 DisplayPort 用于图像输出。另外,USB4 端口也可用于视频输出。值得注意的是,所有外部接口都位于机身后部。就设计而言,这一决定当然是可以理解的。
交流
Acemagic M2A Starship 配备了 Realtek 的无线局域网模块。相同型号已用于 Acemagic Tank03.该无线模块在测试中取得了良好的结果。不过,它没有使用最新的 Wi-Fi 标准。这意味着你最多只能使用 5 GHz 频段。所有 Wi-Fi 测试均使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 测试路由器进行。在有线网络连接方面,Acemagic M2A Starship 提供两个 RJ45 接口,每个接口的速度最高可达 2.5 Gbit/s。
配件
Acemagic 并没有为 M2A Starship 提供太多的额外配件。除了设备本身,相对较大的包装盒内还包括一个 300 瓦的大型电源装置、一根高质量 HDMI 电缆和一本用户手册。
维护
Acemagic M2A Starship 没有提供快速简便的内存或固态硬盘更换方法。这是一个遗憾,因为 M2A 星舰上有两个维护挡板。 王牌魔力 Tank03.不过,只要你稍微聪明一点,Starship 迷你电脑还是可以拆卸的。要进入内部,必须先卸下许多螺丝。在胶粘的橡胶脚下还隐藏着四颗螺丝。卸下脚垫和下面单独拧上的塑料盖后,就只能更换 WLAN 模块了。内存和固态硬盘位于主板的另一侧。基本上,包括散热装置在内的整个主板都必须拆卸下来。我们开始工作,并将设备拆卸到这种程度。遗憾的是,我们无法快速更换内存或扩展大容量存储空间。其他设备在这方面提供了更简单的解决方案。最后,Acemagic M2A Starship 可以配备两个 NVMe SSD。该设备正好为内存提供了两个 SO-DIMM 插槽,其中配备了两个 16 GB 模块。
软件
Acemagic M2A Starship 预装了 Windows 11 Home 操作系统。设备上还预装了两个小应用程序,用于控制灯光和调节集成显示屏。RGB 控制非常简单,不提供太多自定义选项。该程序还可用于开关底部的小型投影灯。正面的显示屏用于显示一些系统信息,可进行有限的定制。不过,Acemagic 可以更有效地利用正面的空间。内置显示屏相对较小,而且由于塑料盖呈弧形,无法始终完美读取。
关于 Acemagic,病毒和木马的话题仍然令人余味无穷。不过,我们无法在测试设备上检测到任何异常情况。为了安全起见,你应该自己完全重新安装预装的操作系统。这个过程与制造商无关,应始终执行!
性能 - 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 或英特尔酷睿 i7-12700H
使用 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900Hacemagic 在顶级配置中安装了快速而强大的 SoC,与 英伟达GeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑可提供出色的游戏性能。另外,Acemagic M2A Starship 配备了 英特尔酷睿 i7-12700H.3D 加速器仍包括一个 英伟达GeForce RTX 3070 笔记本电脑或 英伟达GeForce RTX 3060 笔记本电脑可供选择。
测试条件
所有性能测试均在 "平衡 "能量模式下进行。Acemagic M2A 星舰保持交付状态。安装了测试前可用的所有 Windows 更新。
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H是一款基于英特尔 Alder Lake 架构的高端处理器。该 SoC 拥有 14 个内核和 20 个线程,可轻松驾驭强大的应用程序。竞争对手也表现出了同样出色的性能,这让 Acemagic M2A Starship 有了不错的表现。不过,在直接的性能比较中,它只能屈居第二。英特尔酷睿 i7-12700H 处理器的出色性能 英特尔酷睿 i7-12700H的出色性能 英特尔 NUC 12 Serpent Canyon的出色性能是我们的测试样品无法比拟的。与 Acemagic Tank03不同,处理器的性能无法进一步降低甚至提高。英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 的性能极限为峰值 65 瓦,但长期可用功率为 45 瓦。
您可以在这里找到更多有关该处理器的基准测试结果 这里.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon |
WinRAR - Result | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Acemagic M2A |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Acemagic M2A |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Average of class Mini PC |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Average of class Mini PC (561 - 51004, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Acemagic M2A |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Average of class Mini PC (3604 - 214250, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Average of class Mini PC (225 - 9399, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Acemagic M2A |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=119, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Acemagic M2A |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Average of class Mini PC (1958 - 113499, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Acemagic M2A |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Average of class Mini PC (74.8 - 2039, n=119, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Average of class Mini PC (308 - 26952, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Acemagic M2A |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 |
Cinebench R15 多循环
通过 Cinebench R15 连续循环测试,我们对内置冷却系统的性能有了初步印象。英特尔酷睿 i7-12900H 的最大可用功率为 65 瓦。56 秒后,功率永久降至 45 瓦,这在结果中得到了很好的体现。因此,在长时间负载的情况下,性能会明显下降。
系统性能
Acemagic M2A Starship 的系统性能丝毫不逊色于其他竞争对手。这款游戏电脑运行流畅,能毫不费力地完成多线程任务。DDR5 内存的使用值得肯定,结合我们的测试样本,它取得了最佳成绩,紧随其后的是 Acemagic Tank03.
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 99171, n=119, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在 Edge 浏览器中打开多个浏览器标签页时,我们检测到 DPC 延迟增加。在播放 4K YouTube 视频时,延迟值起初并没有增加。此外,这里还使用了 iGPU,其负载约为 22%。使用 Prime95 进行压力测试后,数值再次略有上升。与其他微型电脑相比,Acemagic M2A Starship 仍然取得了第三名的好成绩。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Acemagic M2A Starship 配备了来自 Rayson 的 1 TB SSD。所使用的型号采用了 PCIe 4.0 x4 速度的 M.2 接口。在测试中,该大容量存储设备取得了合理的性能,在比较中名列第三。从连续性能可以看出,温度会导致性能下降。
在维护部分已经提到,Acemagic M2A 可以安装两个大容量存储设备。不过,安装第二块固态硬盘并非易事。考虑到迷你 PC 的目标群体,直接安装一个 2 TB 存储空间的固态硬盘更为合理。
有关进一步的基准测试,请参阅我们的 比较表.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
显卡 - NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU,16 GB
我们测试样本中的专用显卡是 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU.移动显卡的性能限制从 80 瓦到 150 瓦不等。在 Acemagic M2A 中,3D 加速器的性能最高限制为 115 瓦,这意味着显卡的潜力无法得到充分发挥。从合成基准测试结果来看,我们的测试样品无法与两家竞争对手的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 笔记本电脑 GPU.由于散热装置和迄今记录的温度较高,制造商本可以期望专用显卡的性能更高一些。Acemagic M2A 中的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU 的最大优势当然是充足的显存。这里使用的是 16 GB VRAM。在 Acemagic Tank03时,制造商就已经使用了这种组合。
关于所安装的显卡,一个重要的注意事项与驱动程序和制造商的支持有关。Nvidia 的官方驱动程序无法安装。为什么制造商要绕道而行,只允许安装特殊驱动程序,这对我们来说是个谜。由于 Acemagic 对其设备的驱动程序更新问题相当忽视,这导致了与较新游戏的兼容性问题。同样的问题也存在于 Acemagic Tank03 上,它最终也有类似的基础。可以通过 GitHub 在互联网上下载并安装专门适配的驱动程序。但需要注意的是,这不是官方来源,可能包含恶意软件。
您可以在GeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU 找到更多基准测试结果 这里.
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon |
Acemagic M2A, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU i9-12900H | Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G, AMD Radeon RX 6600M R7 7735HS | Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon, Intel Arc A770M i7-12700H | Acemagic Tank03, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU i9-12900H | Minisforum NUCX i7, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU i7-11800H | Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU i7-11800H | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 12 | 70% | -31% | -3% | -5% | -1% | -44% | |
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 216 | 246 14% | 150 -31% | 217 0% | 230 6% | 233 8% | 75.4 ? -65% |
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 114 | 248 118% | 144 26% | 111 -3% | 108 -5% | 115 1% | 64.2 ? -44% |
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 64.1 | 109 70% | 37.7 -41% | 62.5 -2% | 55.4 -14% | 59 -8% | 37 ? -42% |
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 11.8 | 31.3 165% | 2.13 -82% | 12.1 3% | 12.8 8% | 13.3 ? 13% | |
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 190 | 198 4% | 136 -28% | 183 -4% | 199 5% | 212 12% | 64 ? -66% |
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 79.4 | 97.6 23% | 40.4 -49% | 55.7 -30% | 57.2 -28% | 28.5 ? -64% | |
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 133 | 120 -10% | 104 -22% | 125 -6% | 138 4% | 136 2% | 35.3 ? -73% |
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 78.4 | 214 173% | 61.1 -22% | 75.3 -4% | 68.6 -12% | 79.4 1% | 72.4 ? -8% |
SPECviewperf 13 | 56% | -17% | -4% | 2% | 5% | -52% | |
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 217 | 246 13% | 149 -31% | 215 -1% | 233 7% | 235 8% | 74.8 ? -66% |
Catia (catia-05) | 158 | 381 141% | 211 34% | 159 1% | 155 -2% | 163 3% | 91.4 ? -42% |
Creo (creo-02) | 218 | 273 25% | 77.6 -64% | 215 -1% | 215 -1% | 225 3% | 73 ? -67% |
Energy (energy-02) | 24.8 | 41.8 69% | 19.2 -23% | 24.6 -1% | 24.5 -1% | 25.5 3% | 17.7 ? -29% |
Maya (maya-05) | 308 | 340 10% | 281 -9% | 304 -1% | 333 8% | 337 9% | 97.5 ? -68% |
Medical (medical-02) | 59.2 | 130 120% | 70.4 19% | 58.9 -1% | 67.2 14% | 69.5 17% | 37.6 ? -36% |
Showcase (showcase-02) | 133 | 121 -9% | 105 -21% | 120 -10% | 138 4% | 135 2% | 35 ? -74% |
Solidworks (sw-04) | 115 | 201 75% | 66.2 -42% | 98.6 -14% | 104 -10% | 111 -3% | 76.6 ? -33% |
SPECviewperf 2020 | 167% | -29% | 1% | -7% | -4% | -34% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 9.84 | 20.7 110% | 15.6 59% | 10.4 6% | 10.8 10% | 11 12% | 7.74 ? -21% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 29.1 | 19.1 -34% | 14.1 -52% | 29.6 2% | 20.1 -31% | 19.7 -32% | 10.8 ? -63% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 79.7 | 88.4 11% | 45.5 -43% | 76.8 -4% | 75.5 -5% | 78.3 -2% | 29.7 ? -63% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 37.6 | 55.1 47% | 36 -4% | 38 1% | 36.4 -3% | 37 -2% | 18.3 ? -51% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 84.5 | 42.5 -50% | 40.1 -53% | 86.8 3% | 72.1 -15% | 76.4 -10% | 21.8 ? -74% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 18.7 | 224 1098% | 2.42 -87% | 18.5 -1% | 16.5 -12% | 17.3 -7% | 37.5 ? 101% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 190 | 162 -15% | 149 -22% | 186 -2% | 206 8% | 210 11% | 56.4 ? -70% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 98% /
94% | -26% /
-26% | -2% /
-2% | -3% /
-3% | 0% /
0% | -43% /
-44% |
3DMark 05 Standard | 52380 points | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 51819 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 82066 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 29880 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 85003 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 51583 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 22912 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 12338 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10307 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2337 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 10323 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 10344 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
基本上,Acemagic M2A Starship 配备了 英伟达GeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU性能出众,可流畅运行几乎所有当前游戏。不过,在性能对比中,我们的测试样品无法明显区别于配备 Nvidia GPU 的竞争对手。不过,与英特尔 NUC12 Serpent Canyon 相比,我们发现 Acemagic 优势明显。英特尔 英特尔 Arc A770M没有机会,尽管该机型也有 16GB 的 VRAM。Acemagic M2A Starship 适合全高清游戏。如果不一定总是玩最新的游戏,这款迷你电脑也能以 QHD 甚至 UHD 的帧率进行游戏。此外,还可以选择使用 DLSS 形式的升采样。
如需了解所有测试游戏与其他机型的性能比较,请参阅我们的 GPU 游戏列表.
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G |
Borderlands 3 | |
1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon |
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon |
Far Cry 6 | |
1280x720 Low Graphics Quality | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
1920x1080 High Graphics Quality AA:T | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C |
Farming Simulator 22 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C |
Dead Space Remake | |
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon |
Hogwarts Legacy | |
1280x720 Low Preset AA:Low T | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:High T | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Acemagic Tank03 | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon |
FPS-Diagramm - Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty, 1920x1080, Ultra, (FSR off)
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K FSR | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 338 | 316 | 308 | 260 | 177.7 | ||||
Palworld (2024) | 118.6 | 113.7 | 96.8 | 92.3 | 68.2 | 47 | 35.3 | ||
Enshrouded (2024) | 76.2 | 66.5 | 57.4 | 49 | 38 | 34.4 | 28.8 | 23 | |
Helldivers 2 (2024) | 126.5 | 106.7 | 94.9 | 93.2 | 66.6 | 37.6 | |||
Skull & Bones (2024) | 100 | 91 | 75 | 60 | 47 | 43 | 40 | 31 | |
Last Epoch (2024) | 192.2 | 183.7 | 175.6 | 128 | 83.8 | 40.7 | |||
Alone in the Dark (2024) | 189.5 | 180.5 | 163.1 | 108.5 | 64.9 | 47.3 | 58.7 | 18.4 | |
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 100.3 | 89.5 | 63.4 | 62.4 | 47.7 | 41.5 | 39.5 | 29.8 | |
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 68.9 | 56.9 | 45.2 | 31.7 | 30.2 | 29.3 | |||
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 93.6 | 79.1 | 70.9 | 58.6 | 46 | 42.7 | 28.7 | ||
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 57.6 | 48.2 | 35.6 | 25.9 | 23.7 | 14.5 | |||
F1 24 (2024) | 252 | 230 | 175.6 | 58.8 | 38.3 | 33.2 | 18.7 | ||
The First Descendant (2024) | 147.6 | 93.3 | 76.1 | 64.5 | 43.3 | 24.3 | 23.9 | ||
Once Human (2024) | 188.2 | 134.3 | 114.2 | 104.1 | 69.4 | 36.2 | |||
Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 76 | 58 | 44 | 24 | 27 | 18 | 19 | 11 |
排放物 - 四个风扇的声音清晰可闻
噪音排放
Acemagic 在 M2A Starship 中安装了四个风扇,它们始终保持旋转。空转时,微型电脑仍然安静宜人,噪音约为 33 dB(A)。但是,在负载和游戏时,风扇的转速会大大提高。我们达到了 53.9 dB(A)的峰值,声音清晰可闻。游戏时音量略有下降,但 49.3 dB(A) 的音量也不算小。至少风扇不会产生令人不悦的高频率,这意味着主观噪音水平会稍低一些。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 32.7 / 32.8 / 33.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 40.7 / 53.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A) |
Acemagic M2A i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 6600M | Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon i7-12700H, A770M | Acemagic Tank03 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Minisforum NUCX i7 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 14% | -1% | 6% | 9% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 24.3 | 25 -3% | 30.3 -25% | 25 -3% | 29.5 -21% | 30.7 -26% |
Idle Minimum * | 32.7 | 27.5 16% | 31.8 3% | 26.6 19% | 29.5 10% | 32.7 -0% |
Idle Average * | 32.8 | 27.5 16% | 31.9 3% | 26.7 19% | 29.5 10% | 32.8 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.1 | 27.5 17% | 32 3% | 26.7 19% | 29.5 11% | 32.8 1% |
Load Average * | 40.7 | 38.5 5% | 44.4 -9% | 47.3 -16% | 32.8 19% | 41.7 -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.3 | 39.58 20% | 47.3 4% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 45.8 | |||||
Load Maximum * | 53.9 | 40.7 24% | 44.5 17% | 53.1 1% | 40.8 24% | 45.4 16% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Acemagic M2A Starship 的冷却系统由 7 根热管和 4 个风扇组成,可从侧面和底部吸入冷空气。然后,热空气从两侧和后部排出机箱。通风效果良好,任何时候都不会出现热量积聚导致机箱温度过高的情况。
我们看到处理器在负载情况下的最高温度为 97 °C,但这并不是永久性的。在 45 瓦的功耗下,英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 处理器的温度为 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H温度稳定在 76 °C左右。处理器 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU冷却效果也很好,在负载情况下温度不会达到 75 °C。115 瓦的最大功耗可以在较长时间内顺利耗尽。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.2 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.2 °C / 90 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.2 °C / 90 F for the class Mini PC.
能源管理
与其他微型电脑相比,Acemagic M2A Starship 并不十分经济。尽管如此,我们的测试样本也并非完全不符合要求,在空闲模式下仅需约 30 瓦。在平均负载情况下,我们记录的功率略高于 112 瓦,但峰值功率达到了 212 瓦。电源装置的额定功率为 300 瓦,尺寸也比较合适。
Off / Standby | 1.8 / 3.3 Watt |
Idle | 26.4 / 30.4 / 33.5 Watt |
Load |
112.6 / 215 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acemagic M2A i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 6600M | Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon i7-12700H, A770M | Acemagic Tank03 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Minisforum NUCX i7 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 27% | -35% | -5% | 4% | -31% | 9% | 57% | |
Idle Minimum * | 26.4 | 16.5 37% | 28.8 -9% | 27.5 -4% | 28.2 -7% | 31.3 -19% | 19.8 ? 25% | 9.48 ? 64% |
Idle Average * | 30.4 | 21.5 29% | 39.3 -29% | 30.1 1% | 29.9 2% | 35.1 -15% | 24.3 ? 20% | 11.5 ? 62% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.5 | 24.4 27% | 57.1 -70% | 38.1 -14% | 36.2 -8% | 41.6 -24% | 33.3 ? 1% | 14.9 ? 56% |
Load Average * | 112.6 | 77.2 31% | 158.7 -41% | 101 10% | 83.2 26% | 214 -90% | 108.1 ? 4% | 57.4 ? 49% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 194.7 | 206 -6% | 177 9% | |||||
Load Maximum * | 215 | 193.3 10% | 270.9 -26% | 252 -17% | 215.7 -0% | 231 -7% | 230 ? -7% | 97.5 ? 55% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 167 | 193.5 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption with external monitor
Pros
Cons
评价:外观抢眼的优秀游戏 PC
Acemagic M2A Starship 是制造商推出的一款非常有趣的游戏电脑。不过,它并没有配备市场上最新的硬件,这有点遗憾。不过,英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 的性能与 英伟达GeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU可以实现良好的游戏性能。我们在测试中可以确定,几乎所有现代游戏都可以在 1080p 的屏幕上流畅显示。因此,Acemagic M2A Starship 符合游戏电脑的要求。显存的大小值得肯定,因为 16GB 的显存很少会出现瓶颈。许多游戏甚至在全高清模式下也能充分利用显存。在显卡功耗方面,Acemagic 采取了保守的做法:NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU 的功耗为 115 瓦,其性能受到一定限制,这就是为什么显卡的性能甚至落后于性能良好的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 笔记本电脑 GPU在Minisforum NUCxi7.
Acemagic M2A Starship 是一款非常抢眼的小巧型游戏 PC,具有良好的游戏性能。
Acemagic M2A Starship 的设计当然值得商榷。不过,这款迷你 PC 绝对是一款抢眼的产品。在做工方面,没有什么可抱怨的。它使用了大量塑料,你不应该指望它能给你带来任何触觉上的享受。安装组件的安排不切实际。内存和固态硬盘可以交换,但对许多人来说,够不着它们是个大问题。在 Acemagic Tank03 上,这个问题得到了更好的解决。
值得强调的是,由于设计原因,所有连接都必须移到后部。不过,任何不想经常插拔外围设备的人都能应付自如。另外,还可以通过 USB4 连接扩展坞来避免这个问题。
遗憾的是,散热效果不佳。Acemagic M2A Starship 配备了四个风扇。这些风扇可确保 CPU 和 GPU 在负载情况下保持稳定的性能。不过,四个风扇会产生明显的背景噪音。
Acemagic M2A
- 06/21/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.