Notebookcheck Logo

Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 in review:这款笔记本电脑是否对得起它的名字？

它实际上快吗？

这款笔记本电脑的名字中包含的 "swift "一词表明这是一款强大的设备。阅读我们的评论，了解16.1英寸的宏碁Swift 3是否配备了相对很少使用的英特尔酷睿i7-11370H和其板载的Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs GPU，名符其实。
Business Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake Windows

宏碁提供不同版本的Swift 3。对于16.1英寸机型，我们有SF316-51-75MK旗舰机型供审查。它配备了Intel Core i7-11370H及其板载Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ，配以四通道模式的16GB LPDDR4x内存和512GB SSD。

宏碁Swift 3 SF316-51-75MK不仅要在我们的测试中证明其在各个类别的价值，而且还要面对竞争。我们的评论显示了该设备与配备相同CPU的小米RedmiBook Pro 15，或与配备较弱的Intel Tiger Lake i5-11300H 笔记本处理器 i5-11300H联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6的回顾。16英寸全能型产品，电池寿命良好的联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6相比较，这两款产品都配备了 MX450GeForce 。

Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 (Swift 3 SF316 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11370H 4 x 3.3 - 4.8 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 32 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H35
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - 1024 MB VRAM, Core: 1350 MHz, RAM: 1600 MHz
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR4x (quad-channel)
Display
16.10 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 137 PPI, Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD, 512 GB 
, 420 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: combo, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.9 x 367.8 x 236.1
Battery
56 Wh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 11.5 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix HD webcam
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.674 kg, Power Supply: 271 g
Price
999 Euro
Links
Acer homepage
Acer notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.4 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		1.7 kg15.9 mm16.10"1920x1080
83.2 %
v7 (old)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450		1.7 kg16 mm15.60"3200x2000
82.3 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450		1.8 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080
86 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450		1.9 kg18.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
82.1 %
v7 (old)
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
R7 5700U, Vega 8		1.8 kg16.1 mm15.60"1920x1080
86 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2021
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
R5 4600H, Vega 6		1.7 kg18.4 mm16.10"1920x1080

大多数对比机型都配备了15.6英寸显示屏，比宏碁Swift 3 SF316-51-75MK的16.1英寸显示屏略小。尽管如此，由于显示器边框较窄，该设备除了几毫米之外几乎没有更大的尺寸。

我们的评测样本不需要不避讳面对华为MateBook D 16-53011VFJ 和联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 ，它们也都有16英寸显示屏。MateBook D 16的尺寸几乎相同，但它更厚一点，重量也相同，约为1.7公斤。IdeaPad 5更窄一些，但更长、更厚。因此，Swift 3给人留下了很好的印象，其紧凑的尺寸和令人愉快的轻量，甚至是15.6英寸的对比设备都无法超越。包括电源适配器在内，它的重量不到2公斤。

Size comparison

❌
369 mm 234 mm 18.4 mm 1.7 kg367.8 mm 236.1 mm 15.9 mm 1.7 kg359.8 mm 233.8 mm 16.1 mm 1.8 kg356 mm 251 mm 18.4 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 229 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg351 mm 242 mm 16 mm 1.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性。笔记本电脑有雷电4，但没有SD读卡器

所有的端口都分布在机箱的左侧和右侧。由于侧面的形状，这些端口都位于后部区域，朝前的部分比较窄。然而，它们之间有足够的空间，所以它们不会相互干扰。

有一个HDMI输出，以及一个通过USB Type-C提供的Thunderbolt 4端口，用于连接外部显示器。然而，没有网络连接。

左边：1个电源，1个USB 3.2 Type-C Gen 2（带Thunderbolt 4），1个HDMI，1个USB 3.2 Type-A
左边：1个电源，1个USB 3.2 Type-C Gen 2（带Thunderbolt 4），1个HDMI，1个USB 3.2 Type-A
右边：1个耳机/麦克风组合端口，1个USB 3.2 Type-A，1个Kensington
右边：1个耳机/麦克风组合端口，1个USB 3.2 Type-A，1个Kensington

沟通

内置的英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201在测试中表现稳定，但在发送数据时仍低于平均水平。蓝牙5.1版可用于额外的无线连接。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1420 (686min - 1498max) MBit/s +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1367 (960min - 1479max) MBit/s +21%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s +3%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1126 (552min - 1223max) MBit/s
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
884 (449min - 951max) MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1343 (650min - 1573max) MBit/s +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1339 (1289min - 1364max) MBit/s +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1314 (1233min - 1359max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -4%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1192 (1109min - 1450max) MBit/s -9%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1314 (1233-1359)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1343 (650-1573)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1289-1364)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1192 (1109-1450)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1108 (552-1223)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1397 (686-1498)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1367 (960-1479)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø869 (449-951)

网络摄像头

由于平均DeltaE为10.6，720p网络摄像头在色彩再现方面表现得很好。对于视频通话等来说，这绝对是足够的。

ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
18 ∆E
16 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
0 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Swift 3 SF316-51: 10.62 ∆E min: 0 - max: 18.43 ∆E

安全问题

在设备的右侧集成了一个用于Kensington锁的插槽。没有额外的安全功能。

辅料

盒子里只包括大小适中的65瓦充电器。更多的配件没有包括在内，但它们可以直接从制造商那里购买，形式包括通用的外壳、适配器等等。

维护

进入内部的通道被12颗小的Torx螺丝挡住了。清洁两个风扇，安装不同的固态硬盘，或更换电池，都可以轻松完成。

担保

宏碁在德国为Swift笔记本电脑提供通常的24个月制造商保修，并提供送检和退货服务。可以选择购买第三年的服务延期，以换取50至150欧元（约58至约173美元）。

输入设备。宏碁Swift 3很适合在上面打字

键盘

除了具有坚实的按键尺寸的键盘外，宏碁还在16.1英寸的机箱中集成了一个极其紧凑的数字键盘。除了左右两边2厘米宽的边框外，制造商利用了设备的整个宽度。

打字体验很好，噪音发展也很适中。这使得它很容易快速打字，特别是由于背光的作用，即使在黑暗中按键也非常清晰。

指纹传感器的位置有点缺乏新意；它位于键盘下方的中心位置，在掌托的上边缘。拇指很难触及，但可以用中指舒适地使用它。

触摸板

触摸板略微偏向机箱左侧，位于空格键下方。它非常大，约12.5 x 8厘米。在触觉和功能方面没有任何抱怨。我们唯一可以批评的是两个 "鼠标按钮 "的点击噪音，它们没有显示出明显的分离，因为它们可以更安静一点，听起来更高质量。

斯威夫特3的显示屏是对比笔记本电脑中最好的。

几乎没有屏幕渗漏。
几乎没有屏幕渗漏。

宏碁在Swift 3 SF316-51-75MK中安装了一块带有LED背光的16.1英寸磨砂IPS面板。我们审查样本中的面板来自奇美。分辨率为1920x1080像素，相当于全高清。在这种尺寸下，更高的分辨率将是可取的，因为图像有时看起来略微有些冲淡。这就是说，全高清是这个价格范围内的通常标准。

在其他方面，与所选择的竞争者进行直接比较时，该显示器有许多加分项。它在许多方面都超过了竞争对手。只有当它的亮度略低于300cd/m²和它的响应时间时，它才不得不让位于一些竞争对手。作为回报，它几乎没有屏幕出血现象。

302
cd/m²		283
cd/m²		267
cd/m²
284
cd/m²		304
cd/m²		274
cd/m²
288
cd/m²		279
cd/m²		274
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei CMN160B tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 304 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 283.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 257 cd/m²
Contrast: 1842:1 (Black: 0.165 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
IPS, 3200x2000, 15.6"		Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
BOE NV15N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Chi Mei N156HCA-EAB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
N161HCA-EA3, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"
Display
-1%
-40%
6%
-34%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
66.6
66.7
0%
39.92
-40%
74
11%
43.6
-35%
66.8
0%
sRGB Coverage
99.5
96.3
-3%
58.8
-41%
98.7
-1%
65.2
-34%
99
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
68.5
68.5
0%
41.24
-40%
74.5
9%
45
-34%
69
1%
Response Times
-15%
-48%
60%
25%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
32 ?(15, 17)
34.8 ?(17.2, 17.6)
-9%
41 ?(21, 20)
-28%
13 ?(6, 7)
59%
18 ?(8, 10)
44%
25 ?(16, 9)
22%
Response Time Black / White *
20 ?(11, 9)
24 ?(12.4, 11.6)
-20%
31 ?(17, 14)
-55%
8 ?(4, 4)
60%
19 ?(10, 9)
5%
22 ?(12, 10)
-10%
PWM Frequency
2500 ?(10)
1000 ?(90)
-60%
2500 ?(30)
0%
Screen
-60%
-55%
-21%
-69%
-2%
Brightness middle
304
312
3%
286
-6%
356
17%
289
-5%
352
16%
Brightness
284
298
5%
268
-6%
322
13%
267
-6%
330
16%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
87
-1%
80
-9%
85
-3%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.165
0.18
-9%
0.275
-67%
0.27
-64%
0.56
-239%
0.28
-70%
Contrast
1842
1733
-6%
1040
-44%
1319
-28%
516
-72%
1257
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.44
5.39
-274%
4.74
-229%
2.4
-67%
3.96
-175%
1.35
6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.62
9.95
-175%
8.27
-128%
4.42
-22%
6.76
-87%
2.58
29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
6.3
-142%
1.57
40%
2.81
-8%
3.43
-32%
2.02
22%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.192 100%
2.24 98%
2.4 92%
2.28 96%
2.49 88%
CCT
6527 100%
7473 87%
6348 102%
6294 103%
7191 90%
6445 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68.5
69
1%
42
-39%
63
-8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5
96
-4%
65
-35%
99
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.15
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-25% / -42%
-48% / -50%
15% / -2%
-26% / -50%
1% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

该显示器几乎完全覆盖了较小的sRGB色彩空间，达到99.5%。较大的AdobeRGB仍然覆盖了近69%。然而，这对于专业图形编辑来说是不够的。但是，宏碁Swift 3并不是针对这个目标群体的。

在DeltaE、对比度和黑度方面，我们的评测样本在某些情况下明显超过了一些竞争对手。总的来说，该设备配备了一个良好的显示屏，但我们希望它能更亮一些。

卡尔曼：灰鳞
卡尔曼：灰鳞
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
卡尔曼：色彩饱和度
卡尔曼：色彩饱和度

这将使该设备更适合于户外使用。然而，只要阳光不完全照射到显示屏上，宏碁Swift 3也可以在户外很好地使用，其亮度略低于260 cd/m²，特别是由于采用了磨砂显示屏。此外，图像的视角非常稳定，虽然所有的IPS面板都是如此，但也是如此。

在户外也有坚实的能见度
在户外也有坚实的能见度
视角稳定的IPS面板
视角稳定的IPS面板

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2500 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能。快速的四核CPU，集成GPU

这款型号为SF316-51-75MK的宏碁Swift 3配备了强大的英特尔酷睿i7-11370H及其集成英特尔Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 。此外，制造商还为其配备了四通道模式的16GB LPDDR4x内存，以及通过PCI Express连接的512GB SSD。

除了型号为SF316-51-75MK（NX.ABDEV.007）的配置外，宏碁还提供配有Intel Core i5-11300H和8 GB LPDDR4x内存的SF316-51-54R8（NX.ABDEG.002）的Swift 3。这个功能较弱的版本的建议零售价为899欧元（约合1,039美元），比我们测试机型的价格低100欧元（约合116美元）。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO

处理器

内置的英特尔酷睿i7-11370H是来自英特尔目前的Tiger Lake 系列，今年才推出。目前，它只能在相对较少的设备中找到，如RedmiBook Pro 15比较模型。该CPU与更普遍的英特尔酷睿i7-1185G7 ，但它允许制造商将TDP设定在28至35瓦之间。在这种情况下，宏碁选择了35瓦，从而充分利用了该CPU的性能。在Boost模式下，四核处理器的运行速度高达4.8GHz，而基本时钟速度为3.3GHz。

由于高TDP配置，英特尔酷睿i7-11370H在基准测试中表现积极，在Cinebench的单核得分中处于领先地位。像往常一样，它不得不在多核测试中让位于基于AMD最新Ryzen CPU的竞争者。

在短暂的初始下降之后，该处理器在耐久性测试中表现稳定，与配备相同CPU（PL1可变）的小米红米书Pro 15的水平相当。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520Tooltip
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø926 (914.45-1017.58)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Variable PL1 : Ø928 (765.3-1048.55)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Pl1 @ 25W: Ø792 (781.11-959.72)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; PL1 fixed @ 28W: Ø849 (836.45-917.33)
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø626 (588.39-777.54)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø954 (921.15-990.11)
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U: Ø1437 (1387.54-1534.27)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H: Ø1378 (1362.03-1401.3)
Cinebench R23: Single Core | Multi Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2249, n=90, last 2 years)
1751 Points +13%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1556 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1529 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1081 - 1556, n=11)
1469 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1431 Points -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
1367 Points -12%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1264 Points -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1134 Points -27%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=99, last 2 years)
15382 Points +149%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
9051 Points +46%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
7713 Points +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
6465 Points +5%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
6182 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5639 Points -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5344 (4894.88min - 5344.23max) Points -14%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (3696 - 6646, n=12)
5563 Points -10%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
4914 Points -21%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)
653 Points +9%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
601 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
589 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (475 - 601, n=11)
566 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
548 Points -9%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
526 Points -12%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
490 Points -18%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
454 Points -24%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)
5712 Points +148%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
3536 Points +54%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3219 Points +40%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
2382 Points +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
2299 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
2152 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1438 - 2578, n=11)
2146 Points -7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
1914 Points -17%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=87, last 2 years)
257 Points +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
233 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
231 Points 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
232 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (162.9 - 233, n=15)
220 Points -5%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
188 Points -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
178 Points -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
176 Points -24%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
139 Points -40%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)
2447 Points +140%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1535 Points +51%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1401 (1362.03min - 1401.3max) Points +38%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1049 (765.3min - 1048.55max) Points +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
960 (781.11min - 959.72max) Points -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
917 (836.45min - 917.33max) Points -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1018 (914.45min - 1017.58max) Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
990 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (606 - 1086, n=17)
946 Points -7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
778 Points -24%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
654 Seconds * -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
542 Seconds * -7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
538 Seconds * -6%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (432 - 762, n=11)
531 Seconds * -5%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
507 Seconds *
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
349 Seconds * +31%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
323 Seconds * +36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)
251 Seconds * +50%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)
5727 MIPS +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5411 MIPS 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
5393 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (5074 - 5550, n=11)
5290 MIPS -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4947 MIPS -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
4937 MIPS -8%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
4588 MIPS -15%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4428 MIPS -18%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)
60664 MIPS +125%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
42760 MIPS +58%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
37660 MIPS +39%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
27015 MIPS
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
25382 MIPS -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
25353 MIPS -6%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (18961 - 28520, n=11)
25340 MIPS -6%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
20562 MIPS -24%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)
1821 Points +13%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1607 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1574 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1376 - 1607, n=10)
1540 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1447 Points -10%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
1342 Points -16%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1191 Points -26%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1118 Points -30%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)
12041 Points +97%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
6254 Points +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
6115 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5963 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (3828 - 6115, n=10)
5258 Points -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5214 Points -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4905 Points -20%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
3631 Points -41%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)
16.5 fps +114%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
10.6 fps +38%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.8 fps +27%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
7.7 fps
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (4.98 - 8.82, n=11)
7.24 fps -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
7.08 fps -8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
6.91 fps -10%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
5.67 fps -26%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
59.5 s * -45%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
57.2 s * -39%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
52.4 s * -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)
49.2 s * -20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
47.3 s * -15%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
47 s * -14%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (23.6 - 56.5, n=11)
45.9 s * -12%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
41.1 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.627 sec * -14%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.607 sec * -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.604 sec * -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
0.585 sec * -7%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (0.544 - 0.596, n=11)
0.564 sec * -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.552 sec * -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.548 sec *
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)
0.4833 sec * +12%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1018 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
106 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
232 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2299 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
601 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1556 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
6182 Points
Help

系统性能

在实际测试中，即使在重载情况下，系统也能愉快地平稳运行。各种PCMark 10基准测试显示了良好的性能，其中宏碁Swift 3 SF316-51通常被定位在顶部，与RedmiBook Pro 15直接竞争。配备酷睿i5-11300H和类似CPU的对手一般没有机会接近这一性能水平。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
PCMark 8: Storage Score v2 | Work Score Accelerated v2 | Creative Score Accelerated v2 | Home Score Accelerated v2
PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6816 Points +25%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5625 Points +3%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
5459 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5402 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5199 - 5459, n=6)
5356 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5333 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5110 Points -6%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
4899 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10539 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (9996 - 10650, n=6)
10375 Points +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
10241 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
9270 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9123 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8931 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
8568 Points -16%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8366 Points -18%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
9662 Points +31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8957 Points +21%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8554 Points +16%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8292 Points +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
8111 Points +10%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
7517 Points +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
7388 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (6911 - 7388, n=6)
7057 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9244 Points +58%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5880 Points +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
5838 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5483 - 5838, n=6)
5699 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5691 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5388 Points -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5283 Points -10%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
4600 Points -21%
PCMark 8 / Storage Score v2
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5074 Points +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
4929 Points 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
4919 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  ()
4919 Points 0%
PCMark 8 / Work Score Accelerated v2
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5603 Points +73%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5424 Points +68%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5317 Points +64%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3115 - 6078, n=10, last 2 years)
5081 Points +57%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4067 Points +26%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
3234 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2996 - 3234, n=2)
3115 Points -4%
PCMark 8 / Creative Score Accelerated v2
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
7983 Points +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
7666 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  ()
7666 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6183 Points -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4971 Points -35%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
4703 Points -39%
PCMark 8 / Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
5575 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5025 - 5575, n=2)
5300 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4484 - 5583, n=10, last 2 years)
5126 Points -8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
4944 Points -11%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4652 Points -17%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
4376 Points -22%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4078 Points -27%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5575 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7666 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3234 points
PCMark 10 Score
5459 points
Help

DPC延迟

Swift 3在我们的延迟测试中表现非常好，这是每个被评测的笔记本电脑都必须面对的任务。在所有提到的对比型号中，它的延迟是最低的。因此，在这方面，实时音频和视频编辑的问题应该不会出现，尽管这始终只是一个瞬间的快照。

延迟监测
延迟监测
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5117 μs * -1075%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1945 μs * -347%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
722 μs * -66%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
629 μs * -44%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
587 μs * -35%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
435.4 μs *

* ... smaller is better

储存

称512GB固态硬盘为阿基里斯之踵可能有点夸张。但总的来说，大多数其他比较设备在各种读取和写入基准测试中显示出更好的结果。因此，在长期读取测试中，它在其他类别中排在最后。

然而，由于默认情况下SSD的速度相当快，通常不再像当时的HDD那样成为PC系统中的大瓶颈，所以最终这只是一个题外话，因为在日常工作中没有明显的问题。毕竟，该设备仍然能够领先于配备相同SSD的设备的平均值。

Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G		Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00		Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Average Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
1%
13%
48%
10%
46%
-8%
Write 4K
171.8
136
-21%
207.3
21%
203
18%
116.8
-32%
147
-14%
153.1 ?(94.8 - 259, n=7)
-11%
Read 4K
79.4
60.4
-24%
61.3
-23%
52.3
-34%
43.92
-45%
65.5
-18%
64.6 ?(48.9 - 79.4, n=7)
-19%
Write Seq
1099
1447
32%
1499
36%
2138
95%
1990
81%
2680
144%
1125 ?(1059 - 1154, n=6)
2%
Read Seq
1847
1507
-18%
1858
1%
1974
7%
1959
6%
2556
38%
1808 ?(1620 - 1990, n=6)
-2%
Write 4K Q32T1
539
235.6
-56%
510
-5%
640
19%
373.3
-31%
413.4
-23%
367 ?(64.7 - 539, n=7)
-32%
Read 4K Q32T1
555
737
33%
640
15%
707
27%
524
-6%
500
-10%
507 ?(377 - 555, n=7)
-9%
Write Seq Q32T1
1095
1529
40%
1521
39%
2973
172%
1985
81%
2978
172%
1138 ?(1095 - 1158, n=7)
4%
Read Seq Q32T1
1988
2357
19%
2316
16%
3559
79%
2456
24%
3567
79%
1997 ?(1668 - 2248, n=7)
0%
AS SSD
-100%
-36%
56%
15%
39%
-15%
Seq Read
2015
1972
-2%
2086
4%
2541
26%
2082
3%
2829
40%
1885 ?(1473 - 2036, n=7)
-6%
Seq Write
1055
981
-7%
1124
7%
2555
142%
1844
75%
2423
130%
998 ?(742 - 1109, n=7)
-5%
4K Read
73.9
55.8
-24%
54.1
-27%
56
-24%
44.33
-40%
42.06
-43%
62.2 ?(54.9 - 73.9, n=7)
-16%
4K Write
223.2
133.5
-40%
138.1
-38%
129.6
-42%
157.5
-29%
126.1
-44%
162 ?(127 - 232, n=7)
-27%
4K-64 Read
589
1277
117%
1295
120%
1633
177%
1039
76%
1481
151%
585 ?(581 - 589, n=7)
-1%
4K-64 Write
1029
313.9
-69%
750
-27%
1863
81%
1556
51%
2009
95%
863 ?(196.4 - 1047, n=7)
-16%
Access Time Read *
0.056
0.15
-168%
0.141
-152%
0.077
-38%
0.05
11%
0.079
-41%
0.07329 ?(0.035 - 0.117, n=7)
-31%
Access Time Write *
0.039
0.513
-1215%
0.169
-333%
0.029
26%
0.065
-67%
0.029
26%
0.04957 ?(0.039 - 0.092, n=7)
-27%
Score Read
865
1530
77%
1558
80%
1944
125%
1292
49%
1806
109%
836 ?(791 - 865, n=7)
-3%
Score Write
1358
546
-60%
1001
-26%
2248
66%
1898
40%
2377
75%
1125 ?(539 - 1358, n=7)
-17%
Score Total
2644
2819
7%
3316
25%
5192
96%
3845
45%
5087
92%
2366 ?(1817 - 2644, n=7)
-11%
Copy ISO MB/s
1186
1105
-7%
678
-43%
2246
89%
1441
22%
1358
15%
1191 ?(982 - 1413, n=7)
0%
Copy Program MB/s
782
799
2%
364.8
-53%
861
10%
484.9
-38%
407.1
-48%
477 ?(228 - 782, n=7)
-39%
Copy Game MB/s
1028
957
-7%
557
-46%
1552
51%
1098
7%
918
-11%
857 ?(632 - 1052, n=7)
-17%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-50% / -63%
-12% / -19%
52% / 53%
13% / 13%
43% / 42%
-12% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1988 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1095 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 555 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 539 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1847 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1099 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 79.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 171.8 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

宏碁没有在Swift 3中实施一个专门的图形解决方案。相反，它依靠处理器的能力Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsGPU。配有1GB内存的图形引擎的基本时钟速度为400MHz。当它处于负载状态时，它在Boost模式下可以运行到1350MHz。

没有独立显卡的一个好处是，该设备消耗的能量较少，我们将在下面看到更多细节。尽管如此，该GPU为许多应用目的提供了足够的性能。毕竟，众所周知，它在许多方面与GeForce MX350笔记本电脑相当，在某些情况下，它甚至可以跟上GeForce MX450。

该设备在电池供电的情况下，在3DMark 11中取得了6436分的成绩。这意味着不连接电源适配器时的可用性能只比使用外部电源时低5%左右。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)
20266 Points +194%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
9580 Points +39%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
8517 Points +23%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
7983 Points +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
6904 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2867 - 7676, n=202)
6353 Points -8%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
5667 Points -18%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4505 Points -35%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)
57741 Points +73%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
33806 Points +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
33402 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
27524 Points -18%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (13162 - 38578, n=180)
26508 Points -21%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
25467 Points -24%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
23044 Points -31%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)
14568 Points +152%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
5771 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
5573 Points -3%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2286 - 6482, n=215)
4920 Points -15%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
4766 Points -17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
4435 Points -23%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
3430 Points -41%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
2985 Points -48%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)
5501 Points +220%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
2300 Points +34%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
1896 Points +10%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
1717 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (707 - 1871, n=212)
1495 Points -13%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1040 Points -39%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
914 Points -47%
3DMark 11 Performance
7431 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22314 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5300 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1917 points
Help

游戏性能

眼前的宏碁Swift 3绝对不是一款游戏设备，仅从缺乏专用的图形解决方案就可以看出这一点。尽管如此，它在基准测试中的表现还是绰绰有余的，尤其是在涉及到老游戏的时候。例如， Witcher 3 ，在中等图形设置下可以没有问题，甚至在高图形设置下也有轻微的限制。

总的来说，该设备在测试领域排名居中--尽管大多数其他对比机型都配备了专用GPU。例如，戴尔Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR，配备了NvidiaGeForce MX450落后。此外，Swift 3的性能总是远远高于平均Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsGPU。

CPU的集成显卡显示它们有相当大的能力，所以偶尔的游戏环节对评测样本来说应该不是问题。当然，前提是用户对性能和图形的期望值不要太高。

The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | Rise of the Tomb Raider | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 428, n=47, last 2 years)
213 fps +111%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
136 (12.2min, 38.3P0.1, 86.7P1 - 283max) fps +35%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
101 fps
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
99.3 (8.73min, 25.8P0.1, 56.6P1 - 209max) fps -2%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (28.9 - 117.2, n=186)
84 fps -17%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
54 (32.2min, 32.6P0.1, 38P1 - 130max) fps -47%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
50.8 fps -50%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 327, n=40, last 2 years)
144.6 fps +131%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
81.4 (34.1min, 42.6P0.1, 59.5P1 - 198max) fps +30%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
62.6 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
58 fps -7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
57.8 (27.2min, 33.7P0.1, 39.8P1 - 118max) fps -8%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (21.4 - 77.8, n=184)
53.6 fps -14%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
38.5 (24.8min, 25.3P0.1, 26.8P1 - 66max) fps -38%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
33.2 fps -47%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 290, n=74, last 2 years)
100.9 fps +203%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
42.8 (12.2min, 16.6P0.1, 29.7P1 - 169max) fps +29%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
34 fps +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
33.3 fps
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
30.7 (14.9min, 14.9P0.1, 15.6P1 - 188max) fps -8%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (10.6 - 45.9, n=189)
28.7 fps -14%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
19.6 (15min, 15.3P0.1, 16.1P1 - 25.5max) fps -41%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
19.4 fps -42%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=81, last 2 years)
54.2 fps +219%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
24.3 (12.1min, 14.5P0.1, 19.1P1 - 111max) fps +43%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
20 (15min) fps +18%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
17.7 (12.4min, 12.7P0.1, 13.9P1 - 20.8max) fps +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
17 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (8.79 - 20.1, n=179)
14 fps -18%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
13.4 (8.64min, 9.14P0.1, 10.9P1 - 16.2max) fps -21%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
11.2 fps -34%
Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Average of class Multimedia
  (37.2 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)
139.1 fps 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
139 (124.5min) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
136 (121min) fps -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
123 (110.1min) fps -12%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
104 (93.3min) fps -25%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
104 (92.4min) fps -25%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (36 - 148, n=215)
100.3 fps -28%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
97 (84.9min) fps -30%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (36.7 - 208, n=80, last 2 years)
121.2 fps +39%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
119 (103min) fps +37%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
112 (100.6min) fps +29%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
90.5 (80.6min) fps +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
87.1 (70.8min) fps
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
84.3 (76.7min) fps -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
75.8 (64.7min) fps -13%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (31.6 - 108.5, n=215)
75.7 fps -13%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (28 - 196.9, n=82, last 2 years)
104.2 fps +77%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
104 (91.9min) fps +76%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
86 (74.6min) fps +46%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
80.7 (71min) fps +37%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
59 (51.1min) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (23.2 - 88.1, n=215)
54.2 fps -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
48.9 (44.4min) fps -17%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
48.8 (44min) fps -17%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)
96.8 fps +74%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
95.5 (80.2min) fps +72%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
79.4 (72.2min) fps +43%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
75.3 (66.7min) fps +35%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
55.6 (48.8min) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (20.6 - 78.5, n=215)
49.4 fps -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
45.6 (41min) fps -18%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
45.3 (41.6min) fps -19%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1024x768 Lowest Preset
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
81.1 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (46 - 85.5, n=5)
71.3 fps -12%
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
49 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (35.1 - 49, n=5)
43.6 fps -11%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.2 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (19.9 - 28.2, n=5)
24.9 fps -12%
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
22.7 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (16.4 - 22.7, n=5)
19.7 fps -13%
X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Average of class Multimedia
  (32.9 - 196.4, n=83, last 2 years)
96.1 fps +107%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
88.3 fps +90%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
79.6 fps +72%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
68.8 fps +48%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
46.4 fps
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
43.8 fps -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
42.2 fps -9%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (13.4 - 88.4, n=212)
41.5 fps -11%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Average of class Multimedia
  (25.6 - 177.4, n=80, last 2 years)
82 fps +115%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
73.4 fps +92%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
64.9 fps +70%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
53.7 fps +41%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
38.2 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (11.6 - 69.5, n=213)
35.2 fps -8%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
32.4 fps -15%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
32.3 fps -15%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)
67.1 fps +88%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
62.6 fps +75%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
57.7 fps +62%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
47 fps +32%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
35.7 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (11.1 - 59.8, n=212)
31.6 fps -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
28.9 fps -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
28.8 fps -19%
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (19.3 - 114.7, n=17, last 2 years)
67.3 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
41.5 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (12.1 - 38.4, n=11)
20.7 fps
Strange Brigade
1280x720 lowest AF:1
Average of class Multimedia
  (39.7 - 460, n=71, last 2 years)
232 fps +156%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
134 (96.7min, 110P1 - 199max) fps +48%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
106 (79.5min, 82.5P1 - 156max) fps +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
104 (49.4min, 60.8P1 - 309max) fps +15%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
90.8 (20.4min, 36.2P1 - 384max) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (48.5 - 115.1, n=168)
84.8 fps -7%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
72.3 (43min, 47.8P1 - 131max) fps -20%
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Average of class Multimedia
  (15.2 - 300, n=74, last 2 years)
119.2 fps +196%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
53.2 (44.2min, 46.6P1 - 68.5max) fps +32%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
40.6 (27.2min, 35.5P1 - 61.5max) fps +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
40.3 (10.6min, 19P1 - 257max) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
38.6 (28.4min, 31.8P1 - 76max) fps -4%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (18.2 - 51.4, n=166)
36.5 fps -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
29 (20.3min, 25.2P1 - 38.6max) fps -28%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Multimedia
  (12.8 - 244, n=78, last 2 years)
102 fps +214%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
46.7 (38.7min, 39.3P1 - 62.7max) fps +44%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
35.4 (29.1min, 29.9P1 - 47.3max) fps +9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
34.2 (24.1min, 29.1P1 - 60.9max) fps +5%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
32.5 (8min, 9.79P1 - 290max) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (15.4 - 39.8, n=165)
29.3 fps -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
24.6 (18.4min, 19.2P1 - 33.3max) fps -24%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)
88.5 fps +235%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
32.2 (15.7min, 25.4P1 - 113max) fps +22%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26.4 (6.4min, 7.32P1 - 326max) fps
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
25 (19.2min, 20.7P1 - 31.4max) fps -5%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (13.2 - 31.7, n=163)
23.7 fps -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
21.1 (15.4min, 16.7P1 - 33.8max) fps -20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
18.9 (13.9min, 14.2P1 - 24.7max) fps -28%
lowmed.highultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 101 62.6 33.3 17
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 139 87.1 59 55.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 81.1 49 28.2 22.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 46.4 38.2 35.7
Strange Brigade (2018) 90.8 40.3 32.5 26.4

排放物。愉快的安静的笔记本电脑，只有在满负荷的情况下才会有点热。

噪声排放

在空闲状态下，宏碁Swift 3在26 dB(A)和正常环境噪音水平下几乎听不见。即使在满负荷的情况下，该设备甚至没有超过40dB(A)的标志，所以考虑到这是一个带有主动式风扇的设备，它可以正确地被描述为安静。其他噪音，如线圈啸叫或类似的声音，在我们的测试设备中没有出现。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 26 / 27.7 dB(A)
Load
32.7 / 39 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.929.530.928.230.92530.630.934.632.230.63134.131.629.231.934.14028.42626.627.828.45024.123.724.328.624.16321.124.223.92421.18018.918.519.822.618.910018.117.217.918.318.112518.919.120.118.418.916019.520.420.716.919.520018.419.219.31618.425017.41819.114.217.431516.217.119.713.716.240015.817.421.51315.850015.218.522.312.515.263015.418.822.412.415.480015.620.425.412.615.6100016.323.629.412.416.3125015.123.329.412.715.1160015.221.827.612.915.2200015.222.929.313.715.2250015.421.928.813.715.4315015.420.928.11415.4400015.518.627.814.115.5500015.71825.114.415.7630015.917.523.714.515.980001617.422.415.1161000016.518.420.41516.51250017.219.319.81517.21600015.217.216.313.515.2SPL27.832.83925.927.8N11.62.90.71median 15.8median 18.8median 22.4median 14median 15.8Delta0.81.63.71.10.835.23934.134.639.232.434.131.534.438.342.345.239.242.545.228.530.82727.331.832.938.536.122.241.941.237.926.931.93836.429.120.121.134.324.921.816.916.427.726.92317.218.631.531.220.61919.732.730.721.921.321.93029.319.617.119.53031.416.715.616.73130.915.21413.63131.813.212.712.332.432.91411.611.232.834.515.111.710.734.233.414.512.210.932.833.114.712.211.533.23314.212.511.633.232.513.912.711.832.23413.713.112.333.429.214.413.913.328.729.414.514.814.828.931.314.114.2143128.714.114.213.528.2241413.813.623.323.214.313.513.222.12114.512.912.717.617.612.812.312.315.143.726.925.725.343.54.70.90.70.74.6median 30.9median 14.5median 13.8median 13.3median 313.921.62.43.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Swift 3 SF316-51Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15

温度

尽管噪音发展很低，但温度仍然相对适中。在空闲使用时，所有顶部和底部区域保持在最高32°C（约90°F）。即使在满负荷的情况下，顶部的温度也只上升到40°C（约104°F），最热的区域就在显示屏前面，这也是经常出现的情况。另一方面，触摸板和掌托的区域几乎没有比空闲时的温度高。

唯一真正值得关注的区域是底部的右角，因为当温度高达47℃（约117°F）时，直接放在腿上会变得有点不舒服。然而，这实际上只是在满负荷情况下的情况，这应该很少是该设备的典型用途之一。

宏碁Swift 3 SF316-51-75MK在压力测试中。
宏碁Swift 3 SF316-51-75MK在压力测试中。

宏碁Swift 3在我们的标准化压力测试中没有表现出任何不正常的情况。经过短暂的提升，CPU稳定在2000MHz左右的时钟频率，温度刚刚超过70℃（约158°F）。GPU也保持在这个温度范围内，并在1100MHz左右持续运行。在测试中没有出现节流现象，所以这里没有任何性能损失可以抱怨。此外，即使在压力测试中，风扇也保持着令人愉快的安静。

Max. Load
 40 °C39 °C35.1 °C 
 38.5 °C32.6 °C27.8 °C 
 32.6 °C27.1 °C26.6 °C 
Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 33.3 °C
34.8 °C41.6 °C47 °C
27.5 °C39.9 °C38.4 °C
28.3 °C33.7 °C34.2 °C
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 36.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.8 °C / -6.9 F).

发言人

宏碁Swift 3在音频测试中显示出有些单薄的声音。这主要是由于相对较弱的低音，这显然低于所有测试的笔记本电脑的平均水平。相比之下，该设备以非常平衡的方式再现了中音和高音，因此至少没有明显的失真。

简而言之：对于音乐来说，缺少一点冲击力。这里建议通过音频插孔或蓝牙使用耳机。否则，由于其平衡性，声音再现是令人愉快的，而且对于视频通话等也是足够的。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.528.230.52542.832.242.83131.231.931.24025.627.825.65024.828.624.86321.92421.98020.222.620.210025.518.325.512532.618.432.61603716.93720043.21643.225055.214.255.23155913.75940064.61364.650060.212.560.263061.712.461.780068.612.668.6100069.512.469.5125067.512.767.5160068.512.968.5200068.513.768.5250067.613.767.6315068.41468.4400067.914.167.9500073.214.473.2630072.714.572.7800075.215.175.21000074.91574.9125007215721600064.513.564.5SPL82.325.982.3N53.50.753.5median 67.6median 14median 67.6Delta6.81.16.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Swift 3 SF316-51Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理。节俭的笔记本电脑，电池寿命长

能源消耗

宏碁Swift 3在能源消耗方面表现出色。在这方面，它可以或多或少地将自己与所有的对比设备区分开来。由于其内部的GPU，它的消耗量平均比竞争对手少5%到60%，而且也仅低于GPU的平均水平。65瓦的电源适配器的尺寸绰绰有余，最大消耗量略高于50瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.8 / 7.4 / 9 Watt
Load midlight 34.9 / 51.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G, IPS, 3200x2000, 15.6"		Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
R7 5700U, Vega 8, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
R5 4600H, Vega 6, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"		Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 		Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-62%
-18%
-56%
-18%
-14%
-22%
-76%
Idle Minimum *
4.8
6
-25%
4
17%
5
-4%
5
-4%
5.2
-8%
5.34 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=193)
-11%
6.88 ?(2.17 - 21.1, n=85, last 2 years)
-43%
Idle Average *
7.4
9
-22%
7.6
-3%
9
-22%
7.7
-4%
8.2
-11%
8.55 ?(3.8 - 63, n=193)
-16%
11.3 ?(4.6 - 30, n=85, last 2 years)
-53%
Idle Maximum *
9
12
-33%
10.2
-13%
9.4
-4%
12.2
-36%
9.4
-4%
10.8 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=193)
-20%
13.5 ?(5.6 - 30.4, n=85, last 2 years)
-50%
Load Average *
34.9
74
-112%
49.4
-42%
71
-103%
41
-17%
40
-15%
45.3 ?(12.5 - 87.3, n=193)
-30%
71.9 ?(14.3 - 147, n=83, last 2 years)
-106%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34.9
70.7
-103%
49.4
-42%
72.4
-107%
43
-23%
40.5
-16%
Load Maximum *
51.4
91
-77%
63.4
-23%
99
-93%
65
-26%
67
-30%
67.5 ?(30.1 - 123.3, n=193)
-31%
118.3 ?(47.7 - 270, n=84, last 2 years)
-130%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø34.9 (33.8-59.9)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 i7-11370H, GeForce MX450; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø70.7 (64.4-83.8)
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø49.4 (46.2-64.2)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø72.4 (69.7-85.3)
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA R7 5700U, Vega 8; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø43 (41.3-47.3)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ R5 4600H, Vega 6; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø40.5 (39-50.4)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø51.3 (48.3-61.3)
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø63.4 (56.6-67)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø100.7 (94.5-105)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ R5 4600H, Vega 6; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø66.5 (65.9-67.4)

电池寿命

宏碁Swift 3 SF316-51实际上在纸面上与所选对比机型相比，地位较弱。除了华硕VivoBook S15 ，它的电池是最小的。

然而，由于已经提到的低消耗，该设备仍然能够在电池运行时间方面将所有对手甩在后面。在我们的Wi-Fi浏览测试中，该设备持续了近10个小时，而在观看本地存储的视频时，它甚至可以持续10个小时。即使在满负荷的情况下，该设备也能运行超过1.5小时而不需要外部电源。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
20h 05min
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
2h 10min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 45min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
7h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 15min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 43min
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450, 70 Wh		Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, 54 Wh		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, 75 Wh		Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
R7 5700U, Vega 8, 50 Wh		Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
R5 4600H, Vega 6, 56 Wh		Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-35%
-4%
-7%
-8%
-31%
-2%
Reader / Idle
1205
650
-46%
1163
-3%
710
-41%
1146 ?(612 - 2760, n=18, last 2 years)
-5%
H.264
615
323
-47%
625
2%
510
-17%
821 ?(319 - 1481, n=52, last 2 years)
33%
WiFi v1.3
585
493
-16%
564
-4%
543
-7%
538
-8%
538
-8%
627 ?(279 - 1204, n=85, last 2 years)
7%
Witcher 3 ultra
130
59
-55%
76.3 ?(57 - 96, n=4, last 2 years)
-41%
Load
103
70
-32%
84
-18%
68
-34%
98.6 ?(39 - 212, n=65, last 2 years)
-4%

Pros

+ 电池寿命长
+ 良好的性能
+ 负载下也很安静
+ 稳定的金属外壳
+ 尺寸紧凑
+ 重量轻
+ 指纹传感器
+ 良好的显示效果

Cons

- 相对较慢的SSD

结论：宏碁Swift 3在测试中给我们留下深刻印象

在审查中。Acer Swift 3 SF316-51-75MK。测试设备由以下单位提供
在审查中。Acer Swift 3 SF316-51-75MK。测试设备由以下单位提供

宏碁Swift 3 SF316-51-75MK在我们的测试中留下了全面的印象。

宏碁Swift 3的性能对于这个级别的笔记本电脑的常见应用来说是绰绰有余的，如网页浏览、办公任务和流媒体。CPU还能处理一些要求较高的应用。你还可以玩一些游戏，即使大多数时候只是在中等图形设置下。

事实证明，Swift 3在能源消耗方面具有出色的性能，因此在电池寿命方面也是如此--尽管其电池相当小。我们选择的竞争对手在这方面几乎没有机会。高对比度和生动的显示屏也很吸引人，但它本可以更亮一些。

以大约1,000欧元（约合1,116美元）的价格，买家将得到一台均衡的笔记本电脑，在测试中没有显示出任何主要的弱点，而且不需要在这个价格范围内避开其竞争对手。它是一个很好的全能型产品，既适合工作也适合娱乐。

在列出的对比型号中，它的性能最好，但在某些情况下，它也比竞争对手贵100至200欧元（约116至231美元）。一些在性能方面接近的替代品是采用相同CPU的小米RedmiBook Pro 15 ，或采用较弱的Intel Tiger Lake i5-11300H 笔记本处理器i5-11300H联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6的回顾。16英寸全能型产品，电池寿命良好的联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 ，这两款产品都配备了 MX450 作为其专用图形解决方案GeForce。

价格和可用性

在撰写本文时，你可以在亚马逊 ，找到宏碁Swift 3(Intel Core i7-11370H,Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 16 GB DDR4x RAM, 512 GB SSD) ，价格约为999美元。

Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 - 10/01/2021 v7 (old)
Marcus Schwarten

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
85%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
52 / 80 → 65%
Weight
67 / 20-72 → 90%
Battery
87 / 95 → 91%
Display
88%
Games Performance
72 / 90 → 80%
Application Performance
92 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
90%
Noise
94 / 95 → 99%
Audio
70%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Average
78%
86%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 (Swift 3 SF316 Series)

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 in review:这款笔记本电脑是否对得起它的名字？
Marcus Schwarten, 2021-10- 8 (Update: 2021-10- 8)