Aorus 17X XES回顾。配备i9-12900HX的游戏笔记本提供顶级性能
凭借其最重要的关键规格，这款笔记本电脑注定要用于游戏。由于其360赫兹面板，Aorus 17X应该能很好地处理高帧率。考虑到英特尔i9-12900HX，这是目前Alder Lake级别最强大的移动处理器，拥有丰富的16个核心和NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti，这似乎根本不是一个虚幻的目标。此外，还有一个配备Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti的型号，承诺增加FPS，甚至应该稍快。
有了这么多的性能，竞争对手包括相应的装备良好的游戏笔记本电脑，如 MSI GE67 HX 12 UGS或申克XMG Pro 17 E22.另一个有趣的比较应该是与外部相同的 Aorus 17 XE4，它结合了相同的显卡和一个稍小的CPU。你也可以在Aorus 17 XE4 的评论中找到关于机箱、维护或输入设备的额外细节，因为这些部分对于Aorus 17X是相同的。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 30 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 31 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 27 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
| 87.4 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | MSI Raider GE66 12UHS i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 88.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 20.5 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 85.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Aorus 17 XE4 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 27 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
机箱 - Aorus 17X的大型冷却系统和大量的塑料。
由于体积大，重量重，而且以塑料为主，这款机箱充其量可以说是实用主义的。显示屏的盖子可以更结实一些，但总的来说，没有恼人的吱吱声，而且你还可以用一只手将盖子打开到130度，没有任何问题。考虑到沉重的底座，这当然不足为奇。白色的、发光的Aorus标志看起来很有吸引力。
设备 - 最低限度，但适合于游戏笔记本电脑
连接的数量其实并不丰富。但至少，Thunderbolt 4确保了快速的数据传输。2.5-Gigabit LAN端口提供了类似的优势，不仅是创意专业人士应该对三个不同的视频输出端口感到满意。
通讯
WLAN模块，略微超过了游戏笔记本的平均传输速率，也提供了高带宽。但由于采用了Wi-Fi 6E，这里使用的标准也相应地强大。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=210) | |
| Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (632 - 1851, n=211) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
网络摄像头
与Aorus 17 XE4一样，17X XES也使用一个简单的高清摄像头。由于其分辨率较低，它只是勉强适合视频通话。至少，即使在恶劣的光线条件下，所产生的图像也很容易辨认，而且颜色偏差仍在限制范围内。
另一方面，双阵列麦克风的效果也不错。来自不同方向和距离的录音在几乎相同的音量下被再现。不幸的是，声音听起来非常尖锐，但至少它们很容易被理解。
输入设备--游戏键盘有多彩的照明效果
体面的键盘没有提供大的行程，但有舒适的阻力。框架几乎没有弯曲。至少，有了可自由配置的RGB照明，大量的功能键选择，以及全尺寸的数字块，就没有理由抱怨了。然而，我们必须小心，因为该键盘比标准键盘小得多，这可能会在打字时造成一些刺激。
显示 - 快速但不明亮
对角线为17.3英寸的大显示屏以其360赫兹的刷新率给人留下深刻印象。响应时间也相应变短。此外，还有一个体面的对比度，超过1000:1。高刷新率与全高清分辨率相结合。
不太有说服力的是亮度。即使在桌子上，270cd/m²的平均值有时也显得太低，而且照明缺乏动力。考虑到微弱的背景照明，屏幕出血仍在限制范围内，我们只注意到右上角有一个光晕，图像内容非常暗。
为了使显示器能够自动适应周围环境，技嘉为Aorus 17X配备了一个亮度传感器。虽然它工作可靠，但对于我们的口味来说，它启动的频率有点太高。仅仅通过将手移到前面来制造一些阴影，就可能导致亮度的调整，这也是每次都会报告的。
Nvidia Advanced Optimus在后台运行，将延迟限制在最低限度，确保在iGPU和游戏显卡之间的切换几乎不被注意。这对快速和竞争性游戏特别实用，但在一般情况下也很有用。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 79 %
Center on Battery: 278 cd/m²
Contrast: 1069:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.07
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.224
| Aorus 17X XES Sharp SHP1563, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng BOE09EE, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 BOE099D, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI Raider GE66 12UHS AUO51EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16" | Aorus 17 XE4 Sharp LQ173M1JW12, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -14% | -1% | 19% | 15% | 20% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 70.1 | 59.03 -16% | 71.7 2% | 97.5 39% | 80.4 15% | 98 40% | 69 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 87.46 -12% | 89.7 -10% | 99.9 0% | 98.4 -2% | 99.9 0% | 99.4 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.9 | 61.04 -15% | 75.2 5% | 85.2 18% | 94.7 32% | 86.3 20% | 71.2 -1% |
| Response Times | -192% | 93% | -38% | -287% | -163% | -220% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3.4 ? | 14 ? -312% | 0.25 ? 93% | 5.4 ? -59% | 18.8 ? -453% | 14.6 ? -329% | 15.2 ? -347% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 5.8 ? | 10 ? -72% | 0.4 ? 93% | 6.8 ? -17% | 12.8 ? -121% | 5.6 ? 3% | 11.2 ? -93% |
| PWM Frequency | 100 ? | 480.4 ? | |||||
| Screen | 8% | 24% | 20% | 18% | 16% | 21% | |
| Brightness middle | 278 | 321 15% | 356.1 28% | 349 26% | 351 26% | 459 65% | 274 -1% |
| Brightness | 273 | 302 11% | 358 31% | 319 17% | 347 27% | 434 59% | 267 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 79 | 84 6% | 99 25% | 83 5% | 90 14% | 88 11% | 82 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.41 -58% | 0.32 -23% | 0.35 -35% | 0.44 -69% | 0.25 4% | |
| Contrast | 1069 | 783 -27% | 1091 2% | 1003 -6% | 1043 -2% | 1096 3% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.96 | 1.62 59% | 4.83 -22% | 2.5 37% | 2.54 36% | 2.97 25% | 2.07 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.78 | 4.08 62% | 7.94 26% | 6.87 36% | 8.36 22% | 8.13 25% | 4.89 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.07 | 1.93 -80% | 0.64 40% | 0.67 37% | 1.03 4% | 0.83 22% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 1.24 82% | 3.1 54% | 3.9 43% | 4.1 40% | 4.9 28% | 3 56% |
| Gamma | 2.224 99% | 2.41 91% | 2.2 100% | 2.09 105% | 2.089 105% | 2.235 98% | 2.207 100% |
| CCT | 7651 85% | 6261 104% | 5938 109% | 7192 90% | 7036 92% | 6775 96% | 6999 93% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -66% /
-26% | 39% /
30% | 0% /
12% | -85% /
-26% | -42% /
-9% | -67% /
-18% |
* ... smaller is better
色彩空间的覆盖是针对游戏的最佳选择。sRGB色彩空间基本上可以完全重现。正如预期的那样，该显示器只能覆盖AdobeRGB或DCI-P3色彩空间的部分内容，这些色彩空间大多用于处理媒体。
交付状态下的色彩准确性仍然可以改进。然而，你需要训练有素的眼睛才能真正注意到勉强达到4的DeltaE。在校准之后，我们测量的DeltaE只有1，这相当于一个几乎最佳的色彩再现。你可以从上面的链接中下载相关的颜色配置文件，在面板值的盒子底部。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
很难推荐在户外使用Aorus 17X XES。在阳光直射下，你很难再认出任何东西。即使在阴凉处或从后面照过来，大多数颜色也会缺乏亮度。
这款笔记本电脑仍然足以用于网上冲浪或在阴暗处阅读。但是，图像处理或游戏只能建议在室内进行。
可视角度的稳定性是没有问题的，但我们对IPS面板没有别的期望。即使在几乎90°的陡峭视角下，我们也没有观察到任何颜色变化。虽然亮度降低了，但这并不妨碍识别。
性能--i9 CPU在游戏笔记本中占主导地位
硬件设备证明自己足以满足全高清分辨率的要求。所有目前和很可能还有许多未来的游戏都可以在游戏笔记本电脑上顺利播放，没有任何妥协。如果你能接受较少的细节，非常高的帧率也变得现实，并且由于360赫兹（包括可变刷新率），可以最佳地显示。
此外，总共有24个线程的极快的处理器与32GB的DDR5内存相结合，也允许使用它进行除图形应用之外的苛刻计算。计算性能决不需要隐藏在工作站中。
测试条件
对于所有的测试、游戏和基准测试，以及从文本和图像处理到上网的额外任务，我们使用了技嘉控制中心的性能配置文件的自动切换，这被称为 "Ai Boost"。这不仅可以调整CPU的功率限制，而且颜色配置文件和风扇或键盘的行为也会根据情况而改变。下表显示了为处理器分配了多少功率。
总的来说，该系统工作可靠，能识别所有程序，并将它们与相应的模式联系起来。然而，我们发现颜色配置文件之间非常明显的变化，总是发生一些延迟，这有点令人讨厌。例如，当关闭浏览器并启动一个激活创作者模式的写作程序时，这一点就很明显。
虽然当电源插头从插座上拔下时，完全关闭键盘照明似乎很有必要，但在晚上仍然不大实用。
独立于智能控制，性能配置文件也可以单独调整到最小的细节，以便根据自己的喜好来定位。然而，你需要手动切换它们。你可以通过按下按钮来做到这一点，这也是你可以调整风扇配置文件的同样方式。
| 游戏模式 | 创造者模式 | 涡轮模式 | 会议 | 省电模式 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pl1 | 65 w | 86 w | 86 w | 15 w | 15 w |
| pl2 | 157 w | 157 w | 157 w | 30 w | 30 w |
处理器
这台英特尔酷睿i9-12900HX提供了2个额外的性能核心，相比之下 i9-12900H.再加上8个额外的效率核心，这导致了处理总共24个线程的能力，这在包括多任务在内的高强度任务中变得很明显。
由于只有P核心达到5.0GHz的最大时钟速度，HX芯片在纸面上提供了与i9-12900H相同的性能。 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX在这方面的性能。在Cinebench R15的恒定负载测试中，以及在一般的CPU性能中，它明显领先于AMD芯片。总的来说，i9在原始性能能力方面将大多数竞争对手大大甩在后面，当你考虑到它令人印象深刻的设备时，这并不令人惊讶。拥有6个P核的i9处理器，如i9-12900H，也被甩在后面。
此外，在长期运行中，有一个非常稳定的性能，考虑到高功耗，这也指向了一个非常好的冷却系统设计。在Cinebench R15的第一次运行后，该值在长期运行中甚至没有下降4%。 冷却也代表了Aorus 17 XE4的唯一可见的外部差异。你可以通过风扇通风口看到热管的铜片，而不是由铝制成的黑漆散热片。
我们的 基准列表提供了各种处理器的性能概览。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (18337 - 23482, n=8) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (1897 - 1936, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (7037 - 9042, n=8) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (728 - 745, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (2830 - 3652, n=8) | |
| Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (274 - 282, n=8) | |
| Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (144 - 201, n=8) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (69778 - 88128, n=7) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (6165 - 6358, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (15116 - 16925, n=8) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (1874 - 1949, n=8) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (19.6 - 26.6, n=7) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (33.6 - 42.4, n=7) | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (0.4159 - 0.4242, n=7) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (11535 - 22183, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (52916 - 110093, n=7) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (3559 - 5123, n=7) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (101029 - 104457, n=7) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (10475 - 13062, n=7) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (31779 - 53628, n=7) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (125268 - 183146, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (990 - 1408, n=7) | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (6663 - 11913, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (40239 - 47710, n=7) | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
系统性能
考虑到所使用的处理器，我们几乎期待Aorus 17X在系统性能方面的出色表现。这款笔记本电脑显然能够领先于我们测试的游戏笔记本电脑的平均水平，在某些部分甚至超过了20%。它几乎总是领先于 Aorus 17 XE4这并不十分令人惊讶，因为该系统的处理器性能较低。只有 MSI Raider GE66 12UHS配备了超频的 英特尔酷睿i9-12900HK才能够在整个过程中取得更好的数值。
在几乎每一个应用程序的启动过程中，我们都可以清楚地感受到其性能，而且我们几乎看不到任何延迟。即使并行运行几个应用程序也不会导致任何障碍，这也是由于大而快速的工作存储器的原因。因此，虚拟场景的使用也显得完全现实。
在电池操作下，即强制使用省电模式时，高性能所剩无几，PCMark10的结果只达到最佳值的三分之一。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=164, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=164, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
| Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=164, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=148, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=148, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=148, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=148, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7899 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (62852 - 70863, n=7) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (62140 - 72930, n=7) | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (60001 - 68782, n=7) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (83.9 - 93.4, n=7) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在运行程序时的延迟评估中，这台笔记本电脑无法给我们留下充分印象。为了评估这一点，我们在默认浏览器中打开几个网页，然后以4K分辨率播放Youtube视频并运行Prime95。这导致最大延迟几乎不超过1毫秒。这个数值是有限的，在某些情况下明显低于竞争对手的数值。然而，Aorus 17X XES仍然不适合用它来进行实时音频和视频处理。
4K视频再现给出了坚实但不完美的结果。对处理器的要求不是很高，在完成视频后，总共3500个单帧中只有3个帧被丢掉。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
所使用的技嘉M.2固态硬盘并没有显示出任何弱点。即使在负载测试中，特别是为了显示热量发展是否过高，最大性能也保持不变。PCIe 4.0连接的能力得到了充分的利用。
在其他竞争对手中， Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22显示了事情不应该这样做，因为在很短的时间内已经出现了节流现象。
| Aorus 17X XES Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng WDC PC SN810 1TB | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | MSI Raider GE66 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0) | Aorus 17 XE4 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Performance Rating | |||||||||
| Percent | 76.7 | 55.3 -28% | 75.9 -1% | 73.4 -4% | 77.5 1% | 76.8 0% | 79.3 3% | 74.3 -3% | 59.5 -22% |
| DiskSpd | -25% | 3% | -4% | -2% | 24% | -6% | -6% | -17% | |
| seq read | 3871 | 3605 -7% | 3929 1% | 3141 -19% | 3813 -1% | 4903 27% | 3631 -6% | 3439 ? -11% | 3478 ? -10% |
| seq write | 4224 | 3593 -15% | 4063 -4% | 3391 -20% | 3838 -9% | 7889 87% | 2200 -48% | 3133 ? -26% | 3807 ? -10% |
| seq q8 t1 read | 6921 | 6799 -2% | 6683 -3% | 6766 -2% | 5358 -23% | 10557 53% | 7034 2% | 6974 ? 1% | 6325 ? -9% |
| seq q8 t1 write | 4852 | 5199 7% | 4985 3% | 4993 3% | 4951 2% | 9830 103% | 3611 -26% | 4259 ? -12% | 4867 ? 0% |
| 4k q1 t1 read | 74.1 | 77 4% | 93 26% | 67.2 -9% | 88.3 19% | 73.1 -1% | 88.8 20% | 75.6 ? 2% | 65.9 ? -11% |
| 4k q1 t1 write | 319 | 205 -36% | 275 -14% | 279 -13% | 273 -14% | 359 13% | 356 12% | 324 ? 2% | 222 ? -30% |
| 4k q32 t16 read | 3564 | 1274 -64% | 4176 17% | 4260 20% | 4068 14% | 2390 -33% | 3582 1% | 3521 ? -1% | 2569 ? -28% |
| 4k q32 t16 write | 3570 | 553 -85% | 3491 -2% | 3961 11% | 3478 -3% | 1542 -57% | 3604 1% | 3502 ? -2% | 2121 ? -41% |
| AS SSD | -25% | -21% | -6% | 1% | 0% | 7% | -1% | -36% | |
| Score Total | 9242 | 5693 -38% | 8980 -3% | 9047 -2% | 8959 -3% | 6635 -28% | 9279 0% | 8549 ? -7% | 6743 ? -27% |
| Score Read | 3629 | 1898 -48% | 3469 -4% | 3276 -10% | 3341 -8% | 2619 -28% | 3549 -2% | 3256 ? -10% | 2445 ? -33% |
| Score Write | 3877 | 2955 -24% | 3799 -2% | 4151 7% | 3977 3% | 2556 -34% | 3996 3% | 3713 ? -4% | 3112 ? -20% |
| Seq Read | 5715 | 5233.79 -8% | 5282.63 -8% | 4559 -20% | 5098.97 -11% | 5344.88 -6% | 5031 -12% | 5048 ? -12% | 4940 ? -14% |
| Seq Write | 3218 | 2355.42 -27% | 3975.65 24% | 3548 10% | 3667.77 14% | 7663.27 138% | 3162 -2% | 3202 ? 0% | 3750 ? 17% |
| 4K Read | 94.04 | 68.25 -27% | 86.37 -8% | 63.1 -33% | 84.06 -11% | 68.93 -27% | 108 15% | 90.5 ? -4% | 65.1 ? -31% |
| 4K Write | 256.3 | 224.32 -12% | 240.81 -6% | 254.1 -1% | 244.47 -5% | 328.69 28% | 308.6 20% | 287 ? 12% | 212 ? -17% |
| 4K-64 Read | 2963 | 1306.59 -56% | 2854.25 -4% | 2757 -7% | 2747.2 -7% | 2015.68 -32% | 2938 -1% | 2660 ? -10% | 1880 ? -37% |
| 4K-64 Write | 3299 | 2495.32 -24% | 3160.56 -4% | 3543 7% | 3365.94 2% | 1460.96 -56% | 3371 2% | 3105 ? -6% | 2528 ? -23% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.085 | 0.078 8% | 0.029 66% | 0.073 14% | 0.032 62% | 0.053 38% | 0.048 44% | 0.0632 ? 26% | 0.05526 ? 35% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.014 | 0.017 -21% | 0.054 -286% | 0.018 -29% | 0.018 -29% | 0.013 7% | 0.013 7% | 0.0135 ? 4% | 0.04826 ? -245% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -26% /
-25% | -6% /
-11% | -5% /
-5% | 0% /
-0% | 8% /
10% | 1% /
2% | -3% /
-3% | -25% /
-28% |
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
Aorus 17X提供了NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti显卡的最大功率为130瓦，其中15瓦可以作为CPU的 "动态提升"。在我们的各种基准测试中，该游戏笔记本电脑的表现接近所使用的GPU的平均值。
在TheWitcher 3 的压力测试中，性能也在较长的时间内保持不变，这表明冷却系统的规模足够大。然而，显而易见的是，配备较小的i7-12700H处理器的Aorus 17 XE4在这里的表现更好。看一眼WiNFO的传感器值，就会发现GPU没有达到相同的性能值，这可能可以追溯到较大的处理器的功率和冷却需求明显较高。这意味着GPU的最高温度达到得更快，导致时钟速度降低。下面两张图表的平均值很好地表明了这一点。
你可以找到更多的基准测试和与各种显卡的比较，在我们的 基准列表.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 29161 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 59273 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23528 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 10254 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
我们测试的所有游戏都能够保持超过60FPS的帧率，即使在最高的细节设置下也是如此。这意味着Aorus 17X应该能够很好地处理较新和要求较高的游戏，甚至在可预见的未来。在这里，全高清分辨率也为所需的性能提供了一个务实的限制。
正如已经提到的，RTX 3070 Ti无法发挥其全部潜力。的微星GE67 12UGS采用相同的GPU，在某些方面明显领先。技嘉笔记本电脑的重点更在于生产力。
360-Hz面板可能只在一些较简单的游戏中发挥其全部潜力。然而，由于支持可变刷新率，而且响应时间极短，它在每秒100帧或更多的情况下仍能打出不错的数字。
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (139.7 - 226, n=27) | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=164, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (76.8 - 124.1, n=39) | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| GTA V | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Average of class Gaming (24.2 - 187.1, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (80 - 181.9, n=28) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (44 - 123.9, n=36) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Elex 2 | |
| 1920x1080 High / On AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (36.9 - 118.7, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (83 - 99.4, n=3) | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra / On AA:SM AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (30.1 - 118.5, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (75 - 89, n=3) | |
| Aorus 17 XE4 | |
| Aorus 17X XES | |
除了短暂的下降4%之外，在我们的TheWitcher 3压力测试中，帧率在最大细节上几乎保持不变。这表明，即使在恒定负载下，也有足够的冷却性能。
你可以在图表中以及各种游戏的帧率值中看到 Aorus 17 XE4与相同的显卡和i7-12700H的性能总是好几个百分点。显卡必须与处理器分享太多的资源。然而，这并不改变在适合当前游戏方面的良好总体印象。
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 178.5 | 110.9 | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 158 | 93.7 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 158.3 | 148 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 94.7 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 116.9 | |||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 144 | 135 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 184.7 | 163.2 | ||
| Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 130 | 80 | ||
| God of War (2022) | 92 | 61 | ||
| Elex 2 (2022) | 83 | 75 |
排放--Aorus 17X的高冷却需求
噪声排放
当然，风扇在负载下会变得很响。不幸的是，在某些情况下，噪音量大大超过了竞争对手，但你通常也会听到一些呼呼的声音。
真正突出的是风扇转速的突然升高，有时甚至在电池运行时。在常规负载下，如网上冲浪、图像处理和运行办公程序，这就变得很烦人。风扇的转速一直在突然上升。
显然，技嘉已经注意到了这一点会变得多么令人讨厌。Escape "键提供了第二个功能，只要按一下按钮就可以调整风扇的行为，而不需要做任何其他改变。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 28 / 32 / 38 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 53 / 55 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A) | ||
| Aorus 17X XES GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | MSI Raider GE66 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0) | Aorus 17 XE4 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 6% | 15% | -4% | 8% | 13% | 7% | |
| off / environment * | 26 | 25.4 2% | 22.7 13% | 26 -0% | 26 -0% | 26 -0% | 24 8% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 28 -0% | 22.9 18% | 26 7% | 27 4% | 26 7% | 30 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 28 12% | 22.9 28% | 34 -6% | 30 6% | 27 16% | 31 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 31.2 18% | 22.9 40% | 42 -11% | 39 -3% | 29 24% | 34 11% |
| Load Average * | 53 | 52.2 2% | 44.4 16% | 58 -9% | 45 15% | 41 23% | 44 17% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 54 | 52.2 3% | 55.7 -3% | 57 -6% | 45 17% | 48 11% | 51 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 55 | 52.2 5% | 57.4 -4% | 58 -5% | 47 15% | 50 9% | 49 11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在游戏时，甚至在压力测试期间，游戏笔记本的热量发展并没有变得太极端。掌托保持相对凉爽。键盘区域的热量发展也保持在可接受的范围内，即使按键明显升温。
很大一部分热量是通过底部带走的，它比顶部的温度高几度。我们测得的最大值为65℃（149°F）。这也意味着你不应该在有垫子的表面上使用Aorus 17X，但它最好放在桌子等坚固的表面上。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
| Aorus 17X XES Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Raider GE66 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Aorus 17 XE4 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 18% | 29% | 2% | 4% | 14% | 11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 54 | 31.3 42% | 34.4 36% | 56 -4% | 54 -0% | 45 17% | 50 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 58 | 43.3 25% | 42 28% | 60 -3% | 65 -12% | 50 14% | 58 -0% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 37 | 31.3 15% | 24 35% | 34 8% | 30 19% | 33 11% | 30 19% |
| Idle Bottom * | 39 | 43.3 -11% | 33.2 15% | 36 8% | 35 10% | 33 15% | 32 18% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在恒定的负载下，i9-12900HX最高达到100℃（212°F）。在这之后，Aorus 17X总是不得不大幅节制其时钟速度。然而，只有在显卡也处于重载的情况下才会出现这种情况。在《Witcher 3 》的最大细节设置下，这个场景显示得很好，揭示了耗电的CPU的极高热量发展。
发言人
通过观察下面的条形图，你可以立即看到，这款笔记本电脑缺乏低音。MacBook Pro 16显示了这应该是什么样子的。不幸的是，你可以清楚地听到电子或摇滚等相应音乐的差异。深层频率明显缺乏力量。
相比之下，声音和一般的高频都被清晰准确地再现出来。强调声音的音乐和所有以声音和对话为主的内容听起来都很有说服力。对于笔记本电脑的立体声扬声器来说，这是一个很好的结果。
由于有耳机端口和各种视频端口，有许多额外的选项可用于外部扬声器。
Aorus 17X XES audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 一个耗电的17英寸笔记本电脑
消耗功率
就像其他配置相当、功能强大的游戏笔记本一样，即使没有负载，功耗也已经非常高了。虽然最低18瓦是可以接受的，但如果你考虑到根本没有运行的应用程序，这似乎还是太高了。
超过150瓦的平均负载消耗量明显高于竞争对手的水平。仅i9-12900HX的消耗就比弱小的CPU多出10瓦。然而，这些功率并没有真正得到有效利用。在我们的TheWitcher 3压力测试中，Aorus 17 XE4做得更好，为此也少用了10%的功率。
在最高消耗290瓦的情况下，280瓦的电源仍然能够处理。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
| Idle | 18 / 28 / 36 Watt |
| Load |
153 / 290 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Raider GE66 12UHS i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Aorus 17 XE4 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 24% | 21% | 21% | 14% | 12% | 22% | 25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 18 | 12.2 32% | 13 28% | 16 11% | 19 -6% | 20 -11% | 14.2 ? 21% | 13.5 ? 25% |
| Idle Average * | 28 | 18 36% | 17 39% | 19 32% | 24 14% | 23 18% | 19.9 ? 29% | 19 ? 32% |
| Idle Maximum * | 36 | 19.4 46% | 26 28% | 26 28% | 31 14% | 28 22% | 26.2 ? 27% | 26.7 ? 26% |
| Load Average * | 153 | 128 16% | 120 22% | 110 28% | 104 32% | 120 22% | 125.8 ? 18% | 106.8 ? 30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 221 | 209 5% | 221 -0% | 202 9% | 186.5 16% | 196 11% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 290 | 266 8% | 266 8% | 242 17% | 256 12% | 257 11% | 248 ? 14% | 250 ? 14% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
这并不奇怪，在与Aorus 17 XE4相同的电池容量下，Aorus 17X中更耗电的处理器导致了更差的电池寿命。 特别是在网上冲浪时，尽管系统上几乎没有任何值得一提的负载，但笔记本的表现却令人难以信服。你几乎没有超过4小时的时间再去寻找另一个插座。尽管有省电模式和有限的亮度，但结果仍然低于平均水平，尽管电池储存了近100Wh。
这台笔记本电脑根本不是为电池工作而设计的，所以你应该总是把电源放在伸手可及的地方，尽管它绝不是小的。
| Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 78 Wh | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Aorus 17 XE4 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 46% | 38% | 25% | 65% | 29% | 41% | |
| H.264 | 226 | 273 21% | 559 147% | 366 62% | 408 ? 81% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 266 | 371 39% | 336 26% | 408 53% | 469 76% | 308 16% | 376 ? 41% |
| Load | 86 | 131 52% | 128 49% | 88 2% | 62 -28% | 94 9% | 85.8 ? 0% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 使用技嘉笔记本电脑进行游戏和工作
Aorus 17X XES的核心和亮点是其处理器。有了i9-12900HX，这款笔记本电脑在CPU基准测试中遥遥领先，在高要求的任务中具有令人信服的性能，它也可以很容易地并行运行。 大量的DDR5内存和快速而有能力的M.2 SSD强调了在系统性能方面的高远目标。
尽管有360赫兹的全sRGB色彩空间覆盖的显示器和Nvidia Advanced Optimus的相应快速显示，但这绝不是一台纯粹的游戏笔记本电脑。在办公桌上的合适位置，有一到三个合适的屏幕连接到其视频端口，它也能够证明其工作站的品质。
除其他外，32GB的工作内存非常适用于此。此外，处理器似乎太强大了，而且太需要冷却，无法充分利用显卡的性能，这在游戏时可能成为一个相当大的障碍。
Aorus 17X并不是一台纯粹的游戏笔记本电脑，它同样可以胜任苛刻的任务和偶尔的高水平游戏。
这并不奇怪，这款笔记本电脑在电池寿命、噪音和热量发展方面变得相当弱。强大的组件要求在移动性方面做出明显的妥协。然而，考虑到非常大的电池，我们仍然期待更多。
连接设备也可以变得更丰富一些。17英寸的笔记本电脑肯定会提供足够的空间。此外，两个USB-A连接仍然使用USB 3.0标准，只有5Gbit/s。另一方面，Thunderbolt 4、2.5-Gigbit LAN，以及HDMI和DP多少弥补了这一点。
但当然，这并不能改变良好的系统性能。如果一台笔记本电脑应该工作得非常快，而且还能以最佳质量显示游戏，这里就有了一切。但如果游戏应该是在前台，那么Aorus 17 XE4可能是一个更好的选择。较小的处理器明显降低了价格，但没有限制游戏期间的性能。你可以找到一个更高的系统性能，但价格也相应较高。 MSI Raider GE66，比如说。
价格和可用性
Aorus 17X的上市价格为Gigabyte，而类似的Aorus 17配置与英特尔i9-12900H处理器在BestBuy，售价2999美元。.你可以找到配备i7-12700H的Aorus 17 XE4，它在纯游戏性能方面表现更好，在亚马逊售价1999美元。.
Aorus 17X XES
- 08/17/2022 v7 (old)
Mario Petzold
Price comparison
