Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 评测--无风扇 M4 SoC 领先竞争对手多年

功率更大,价格更低。

Apple MacBook Air 15 配备了快如闪电的 M4 SoC,但仍采用被动散热方式。它还配备了新的 1200 万像素网络摄像头和新的配色。不过,它的 60 Hz 显示屏没有变化,也没有哑光选项,但 Air 现在便宜了 100 美元。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AI ARM Apple Laptop / Notebook macOS MacBook Thunderbolt

结论:MacBook Air 15 M4 以更低的价格提供更强的性能

即使采用了全新的 M4 处理器,MacBook Air 15 在日常使用中仍然是一款整体性能非常出色的产品,它的高 CPU 性能与被动散热相结合,尤其令人印象深刻。即使在持续负载的情况下,该处理器仍然比英特尔的 Lunar Lake 芯片更快,例如,在单核性能方面,M4 处理器至少领先竞争对手两代。在没有风扇的情况下,Windows 世界中根本没有其他设备能达到如此快的速度。

Apple 还将入门级产品的价格降低了 100 美元,但内存和固态硬盘存储的高额附加费以及缺乏可用的维护选项等问题依然没有改变。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

它的显示屏也没有任何变化,这可能会让一些消费者失望。如果你想要哑光屏或 120 Hz,你还是得换成更笨重、更昂贵的 MacBook Pro。即便如此,它的 IPS 显示屏在没有 PWM 的情况下仍能提供出色的图像质量。IPS 屏幕需要消耗大量电能,尤其是在高亮度情况下,但总体而言,这款笔记本电脑的电池续航时间仍然一如既往地出色。不过,一些竞争对手,如 ThinkPad X9等竞争对手在图像质量和电池续航时间方面都占据了上风。

MacBook Air 当然可以做得更好,但你也必须考虑到它在产品系列中的地位,因为它是Apple 价格最实惠的系列。此外,配备哑光显示屏和 120 Hz 频率的 MacBook Air 15 自然会影响 MacBook Pro 14 M4 的销售数字。 MacBook Pro 14 M4.

Pros

+ 高品质超薄机壳
+ 超快的 M4 SoC
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 永久静音运行
+ 明亮的 P3 显示屏,无 PWM
+ 出色的扬声器
+ 150 尼特的超长电池续航时间
+ 改进的 12 百万像素网络摄像头

Cons

- 无 Wi-Fi 7 或 120 Hz
- 只有 2x USB-C 接口,没有读卡器
- 电源太弱(35 瓦)
- 没有维护选项,升级费用昂贵

价格和供应情况

你可以直接从Apple 订购新款 MacBook Air 15 M4 ,15 英寸机型的起价为 1,199 美元。你也可以在亚马逊等其他主要在线零售商处购买。

Apple 更新了 MacBook Air 产品线,在笔记本电脑中安装了 M4 处理器。旧的 M3 代的内存已在去年增加到至少 16 GB,但现在 M4 MacBook Air 的内存已增加到 32 GB。令人有些意外的是,Apple ,这两款产品的入门级价格分别降低了 100 美元;配备 16GB 内存和 256GB 固态硬盘的 MacBook Air 15 现在的起价为 1199 美元。我们的测试机配备 1 TB 固态硬盘和 16 GB 内存,MRSP 为 1599 美元。

规格

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Processor
Apple M4 (10 cores) 10 x 2.9 - 4.5 GHz, 20.5 W PL2 / Short Burst, 9 W PL1 / Sustained
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5-7500, onboard
Display
15.30 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1864 pixel 224 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
Apple SSD AP1024Z, 1024 GB 
, 955 GB free
Connections
2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 11.5 x 340.4 x 237.6
Battery
66.5 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Apple macOS 15 Sequoia
Camera
Webcam: 12 MP Center Stage
Primary Camera: 12 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Six-speaker sound system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 35W Dual-USB-C PSU, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.52 kg, Power Supply: 188 g
Price
1999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳和连接

天蓝色 MacBook Air 15 M4(左)与太空灰 MacBook Air 13 M1(右)
天蓝色 MacBook Air 15 M4(左)与太空灰 MacBook Air 13 M1(右)

Apple MacBook 的外壳设计没有任何改变,其 11.5 毫米的纤薄设计依然令人印象深刻。铝合金一体成型机身的质量依然很好,但 Air 15 1.52 千克的重量也不轻。可选颜色有所变化,太空灰被取消,取而代之的是天蓝色。

我们对其制造质量和稳定性仍然没有什么可抱怨的,但其连接情况仍然仅限于 MagSafe 和 2x USB-C。不过值得庆幸的是,这些连接现在都支持 Thunderbolt 4,M4 SoC 除了内部面板外,还可以控制两个外部显示器。维护选项不可用。

Mac 的 Wi-Fi 模块仍然支持包括蓝牙 5.3 在内的 Wi-Fi 6E,在我们使用华硕参考路由器进行的测试中,其传输速率非常稳定。网络摄像头有了重大升级,现在安装了一个 1200 万像素的传感器,除了图像跟踪(Center Stage)外,还支持桌面视图。

尺寸比较

352.6 mm 226.9 mm 15.9 mm 1.4 kg340 mm 228.5 mm 17.7 mm 1.4 kg343.8 mm 235.4 mm 13.9 mm 1.5 kg340.4 mm 237.6 mm 11.5 mm 1.5 kg340.4 mm 237.6 mm 11.5 mm 1.5 kg329 mm 237 mm 18.29 mm 1.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
左:MagSafe、2 个 USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4(40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery)
左:MagSafe、2 个 USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4(40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery)
右:3.5 毫米音频
右:3.5 毫米音频
Networking
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1762 (min: 1689) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1618 (min: 1588) MBit/s ∼92%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel BE201 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1656 (min: 1540) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1568 (min: 1525) MBit/s ∼89%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1243 (min: 1139) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1602 (min: 1438) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1029 (min: 963) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1656 (min: 836) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel BE201 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1280 (min: 1203) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1405 (min: 1272) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1516 (min: 1367) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1613 (min: 1567) MBit/s ∼97%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm FastConnect 7800
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1595 (min: 1475) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1740 (min: 1673) MBit/s ∼99%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1698 (min: 1601) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1756 (min: 1717) MBit/s ∼100%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1762 (1689-1816)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1618 (1588-1651)
ColorChecker
17.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
17 ∆E
7 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple MacBook Air 15 M4: 13.25 ∆E min: 5.86 - max: 18.74 ∆E

可持续性

Apple 在其网站上提供了一份详细的环境报告。该设备由 55% 的可回收材料制成。

输入设备

与前代机型相比,它的输入设备没有任何变化。这款笔记本电脑的键盘很舒适,但如果能增加一些键程就更好了。例如,ThinkPad X9 在这方面就有明显的优势。触觉触摸板依然运行出色,但Honor 或华为的竞争对手也在跟进,例如在边缘提供了额外的手势,这些手势由振动电机支持。因此,Apple 在这方面不再具有优势。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光
键盘背光

显示屏 - IPS,60 赫兹

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
几乎没有背光出血
几乎没有背光出血

现在,MacBook Pro 配备了哑光显示屏,许多用户肯定希望 MacBook Air 能有更新,但遗憾的是,情况并非如此。但遗憾的是,MacBook Air 并没有这样做。它仍然使用我们熟悉的 IPS 屏幕,画质依然非常出色,没有任何 PWM 闪烁现象。亮度和色温都可以自动调节。它的频率也仍然是 60 赫兹,这在运动时会很明显。一些竞争对手在这方面做得更好。

它的亮度超过 500 cd/m²,我们对它的黑阶或对比度没有太多的批评。它的出厂校准非常好,完全覆盖了 P3 色彩空间。即使在最大亮度下,背光也几乎没有出血现象,响应时间也很好。

476
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 546 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 512.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 525 cd/m²
Contrast: 1641:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
88.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3", 60 Hz
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
IPS, 2880x1664, 15.6", 60 Hz
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
ATNA53JB01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Sharp LQ150P1JX61, IPS, 2496x1664, 15", 120 Hz
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
CSOT T3 MNF307ZB1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
ATNA56AC03-0, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6", 120 Hz
Display
-0%
3%
-0%
Display P3 Coverage
98.7
98.7
0%
100
1%
98.8
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.9
0%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
88.3
87.8
-1%
94.6
7%
87.5
-1%
Response Times
-6%
97%
-70%
-2%
97%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
33.2 ?(10.5, 12.7)
35.3 ?(16.4, 17.9)
-6%
1.46 ?(0.7, 0.76)
96%
44.4 ?(21.3, 23.1)
-34%
27 ?(13, 14)
19%
0.61 ?(0.3, 0.31)
98%
Response Time Black / White *
14.7 ?(4.6, 10.1)
15.6 ?(5.2, 10.4)
-6%
0.44 ?(0.24, 0.2)
97%
30.3 ?(15.9, 14.4)
-106%
17.9 ?(8.7, 9.2)
-22%
0.67 ?(0.34, 0.33)
95%
PWM Frequency
1200 ?(77)
240 ?(100)
Screen
8%
403%
20%
-4%
155%
Brightness middle
525
526
0%
509
-3%
579.9
10%
509
-3%
378
-28%
Brightness
513
506
-1%
508
-1%
576
12%
479
-7%
379
-26%
Brightness Distribution
87
92
6%
97
11%
92
6%
90
3%
98
13%
Black Level *
0.32
0.37
-16%
0.01
97%
0.34
-6%
0.32
-0%
0.02
94%
Contrast
1641
1422
-13%
50900
3002%
1706
4%
1591
-3%
18900
1052%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.7
1.4
18%
1.1
35%
0.96
44%
2.47
-45%
1
41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4
2
50%
2.5
37%
2.39
40%
4.73
-18%
2.6
35%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
2.1
22%
1.5
44%
1.4
48%
1.5
44%
1.2
56%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.23 99%
2.28 96%
2.13 103%
2.19 100%
2.19 100%
CCT
7010 93%
6865 95%
6294 103%
6407 101%
6790 96%
6460 101%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.6
1.06
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / 4%
168% / 263%
-25% / 2%
-2% / -3%
126% / 143%

* ... smaller is better

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 色彩检查器

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.6 ms rise
↘ 10.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.5 ms rise
↘ 12.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8580 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在阳光下
在阳光下
室外(无阳光直射的晴朗天气)
室外(无阳光直射的晴朗天气)
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - MacBook Air 现配备高达 32GB 内存

处理器 - M4 SoC

我们已经熟悉了 M4 SoC它的整体性能再次非常出色。M4 在测试设备内的最大功耗为 20.5 瓦,但在我们的测试过程中,功耗迅速降低,并在连续负载 20 分钟后最终稳定在 9 瓦(1 分钟后约为 15.5 瓦;5 分钟后为 12 瓦)。因此,它的多核性能略低于 MacBook Pro,但总体上仍然非常出色,特别是考虑到它运行 Cinebench 2024 多核测试的时间(几分钟)。30 分钟后,它的性能为 776 分,仅比 Lunar Lake 竞争对手低 11%,因此仍优于 Lunar Lake 竞争对手。在更短的 Geekbench 测试中,它的表现甚至更好。

不过,M4 的真正亮点是其巨大的单核性能,它不必躲避其较大的同胞兄弟 M4 Pro/Max。根据不同的基准测试,M4 的性能比目前的 Lunar Lake 或快速 Snapdragon 双核 Turbo 机型高出 30-45%。一如既往,它在电池模式下的性能绝对稳定。

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
CPU Performance Rating
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z
99.5 pt
Average Apple M4 (10 cores)
 
98.8 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
96 pt
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
79.7 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
76.4 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
72 pt
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
69.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
68.7 pt
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z
986 Points +13%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
956 Points +9%
Average Apple M4 (10 cores)
  (874 - 986, n=4)
947 Points +8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
926 Points +6%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
874 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
630 Points -28%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
598 Points -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
574 Points -34%
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Average Apple M4 (10 cores)
  (173 - 177, n=4)
174.5 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z
174 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
173 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
142 Points -18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
123 Points -29%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
120 Points -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
119.7 Points -31%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
108 Points -38%
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z
15128 Points +2%
Average Apple M4 (10 cores)
  (14690 - 15173, n=5)
14993 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
14901 Points
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
14256 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
14220 Points -5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
7596 Points -49%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
7596 Points -49%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
12066 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
11037 Points -26%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
10952 Points -27%
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
Average Apple M4 (10 cores)
  (3655 - 3838, n=5)
3733 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z
3673 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
3655 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
3130 Points -14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
2812 Points -23%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
1896 Points -48%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
1896 Points -48%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
2795 Points -24%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
2680 Points -27%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2454 Points -33%
Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z
13.6 Points per Watt +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
13.5 Points per Watt
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU
M3 8-Core GPU, M3
12.7 Points per Watt -6%
Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X1-26-100, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
8.28 Points per Watt -39%
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA
Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
6.04 Points per Watt -55%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
5.89 Points per Watt -56%
Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Micron MT001TAYAX8U40
5.86 Points per Watt -57%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
5.25 Points per Watt -61%
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA
Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00
3.9 Points per Watt -71%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Core 5 220H, YMTC PC411-1TB
3.68 Points per Watt -73%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3.64 Points per Watt -73%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W
Radeon RX 8060S, Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
2.62 Points per Watt -81%
Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
33.7 Points per Watt
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU
M3 8-Core GPU, M3
28.3 Points per Watt -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z
24.8 Points per Watt -26%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
22.2 Points per Watt -34%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
19.7 Points per Watt -42%
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA
Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00
18.5 Points per Watt -45%
Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X1-26-100, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
17.9 Points per Watt -47%
Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Micron MT001TAYAX8U40
17.1 Points per Watt -49%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W
Radeon RX 8060S, Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
14.7 Points per Watt -56%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
14.1 Points per Watt -58%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Core 5 220H, YMTC PC411-1TB
12.9 Points per Watt -62%
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA
Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
12.3 Points per Watt -64%
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12335 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2165 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
173 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
874 Points
Help

系统性能

非晶态内存标记
非晶态内存标记

全新 MacBook Air 15 M4 是一款速度极快的笔记本电脑,其合成基准测试结果令人印象深刻。在跨平台的 CrossMark 测试中,MacBook 的性能超过了整个 Windows 竞争产品。标准配置为 16GB 内存,现在可以选择最大 32GB 内存(需额外支付 400 美元)。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark / Overall
Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (1944 - 2066, n=4)
2010 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
1978 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1857 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
1742 Points -12%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
1663 Points -16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (365 - 1978, n=64, last 2 years)
1568 Points -21%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
1385 Points -30%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
978 Points -51%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (1797 - 1933, n=4)
1881 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
1871 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1728 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
1684 Points -10%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
1612 Points -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (364 - 1875, n=64, last 2 years)
1508 Points -19%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
1303 Points -30%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
913 Points -51%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (2298 - 2420, n=4)
2365 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
2298 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
2210 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
1977 Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
1862 Points -19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (372 - 2298, n=64, last 2 years)
1727 Points -25%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
1496 Points -35%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1090 Points -53%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (1393 - 1569, n=4)
1505 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
1490 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1367 Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (312 - 1899, n=64, last 2 years)
1333 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
1322 Points -11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
1320 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
1301 Points -13%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
869 Points -42%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
479 Points
Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (430 - 479, n=4)
464 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
448 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
444 Points -7%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
419 Points -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (156 - 479, n=64, last 2 years)
311 Points -35%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
306 Points -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
291 Points -39%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
348 Points
Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (315 - 348, n=4)
333 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
315 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
313 Points -10%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
285 Points -18%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
284 Points -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
281 Points -19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (132 - 348, n=64, last 2 years)
262 Points -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Subnotebook
  (278 - 1104, n=72, last 2 years)
515 ms * -85%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
474 ms * -70%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
471 ms * -69%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
454.4 ms * -63%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
399.4 ms * -43%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
363.1 ms * -30%
Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (262 - 319, n=4)
281 ms * -1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
278.4 ms *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

非晶磁盘标记
非晶磁盘标记

现在它的内存至少是 16GB,但 MacBook 的固态硬盘容量仍然是 256GB。我们测试设备中的 1TB SSD(板载)使其总价提高了 600 美元之多。它的传输速度不是特别快,最高只有 3GB/s,但对于日常使用来说已经足够了。首次启动设备后,用户可以使用 955 GB 的容量。

No HDD benchmark entry found!
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test: 5GB Read | 5GB Write
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test / 5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
5401.3 MB/s +86%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP1024Z
5175 MB/s +78%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
Apple SSD AP1024Z
5060.9 MB/s +74%
Average Apple SSD AP1024Z
  (2797 - 5175, n=8)
3667 MB/s +26%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
Apple SSD AP0512Z
3028 MB/s +4%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple SSD AP0512Z
2947.8 MB/s +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2904 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2848 - 2948, n=4, last 2 years)
2901 MB/s 0%
Apple Mac Mini M4
Apple SSD AP0256Z
1326.6 MB/s -54%
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test / 5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
6713.2 MB/s +122%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP1024Z
6431 MB/s +113%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
Apple SSD AP1024Z
6242.8 MB/s +106%
Average Apple SSD AP1024Z
  (2873 - 6431, n=8)
4218 MB/s +39%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
Apple SSD AP0512Z
3426 MB/s +13%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple SSD AP0512Z
3217.8 MB/s +6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2873 - 3243, n=4, last 2 years)
3089 MB/s +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple SSD AP1024Z
3023.9 MB/s
Apple Mac Mini M4
Apple SSD AP0256Z
1927.7 MB/s -36%

图形卡

在我们的测试中,配备 10 个内核的 M4 GPU 性能非常出色,尤其是在与 Lunar Lake iGPU 直接比较时。它的性能也与 M4 MacBook Pro 相当--至少在短期基准测试中是如此。在较长的负载情况下,图形处理器的性能下降了约 22%。它的游戏性能也相当不错,尽管原生游戏(如本例中的《博德之门 3》)的可用性仍然是限制因素。

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
3932 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
3839 Points
Average Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (3583 - 3989, n=5)
3787 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
3227 Points -16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1034 - 3839, n=16, last 2 years)
2429 Points -37%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
2000 Points -48%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
9162 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
8735 Points
Average Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (7335 - 9162, n=4)
8480 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
7331 Points -16%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
6303 Points -28%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (659 - 8735, n=16, last 2 years)
5244 Points -40%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
9628 Points +6%
Average Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (8457 - 9636, n=5)
9140 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
9092 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
8286 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
7068 Points -22%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
6323 Points -30%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2798 - 9092, n=28, last 2 years)
6002 Points -34%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
59.8 fps +7%
Average Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (48.6 - 63.1, n=5)
56.5 fps +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
55.9 fps
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
52.6 fps -6%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
49.6 fps -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16.3 - 88.9, n=15, last 2 years)
41.6 fps -26%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
136.6 fps +11%
Average Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (105.4 - 144, n=5)
124.8 fps +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
123.3 fps
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
120 fps -3%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
105.7 fps -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (37.4 - 123.3, n=14, last 2 years)
84.4 fps -32%
Geekbench 6.4 / GPU Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
57998 Points +6%
Average Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (53465 - 57998, n=4)
56075 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
54887 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (45460 - 54887, n=4, last 2 years)
48933 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
47699 Points -13%
Geekbench 6.4 / GPU OpenCL
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
38291 Points +6%
Average Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (36135 - 38291, n=3)
37441 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
36135 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
30470 Points -16%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
29175 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
27248 Points -25%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (9516 - 52427, n=61, last 2 years)
26442 Points -27%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
20551 Points -43%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
20104 Points -44%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
15316 Points -58%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
15316 Points -58%
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
3839 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
3851 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Average of class Subnotebook
  (103 - 237, n=4, last 2 years)
150.8 Seconds * -46%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
129 Seconds * -25%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
103 Seconds *
Average Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (n=1)
103 Seconds * -0%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
593 Seconds * -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
584 Seconds * -44%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (241 - 1127, n=67, last 2 years)
565 Seconds * -40%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
545 Seconds * -35%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
533 Seconds * -32%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
491 Seconds * -21%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
405 Seconds *
Average Apple M4 10-core GPU
  (n=1)
405 Seconds * -0%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
Average of class Subnotebook
  (210 - 364, n=6, last 2 years)
240 Seconds *
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
210 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
50.3 (43min) fps +80%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
31.6 fps +13%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
27.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
25.5 fps -9%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
24.1 fps -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12.1 - 31.1, n=38, last 2 years)
22.1 fps -21%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
19 fps -32%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
17.1 fps -39%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
16.9 fps -39%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
35.7 (29min) fps +98%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
28.2 (23.1min) fps +57%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8.48 - 31.4, n=42, last 2 years)
20.5 fps +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
20.4 fps +13%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
18.3 (14.1min) fps +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
18 fps
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
14.4 (11.2min) fps -20%
Total War Pharaoh - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
51.4 (42min) fps +46%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
39.9 fps +13%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
35.2 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16.7 - 50, n=8, last 2 years)
31.7 fps -10%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
28 fps -20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
76 (56min) fps +124%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
41 fps +21%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
34 fps
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
30 fps -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22.4 - 34, n=5, last 2 years)
28.3 fps -17%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

No graph data
lowmed.highultra
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 106 43 39 34
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 44.7 34.2 29.8 27.9
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 32.5 26.1 21.9 18
Total War Pharaoh (2023) 51.1 45.7 44.5 35.2

排放与能源

噪音排放

MacBook Air 15 继续采用被动散热方式,因此在任何情况下都能保持完全静音,这与其 Windows 竞争对手相比简直是巨大的优势。

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Noise
off / environment *
24.4
23.3
23.2
24.3
Idle Minimum *
24.4
23.3
23.2
24.3
Idle Average *
24.4
23.3
23.2
24.3
Idle Maximum *
24.4
23.3
26.1
26.2
Load Average *
35.8
25.7
30.9
32.5
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
39.4
31.1
34.1
35.2
Load Maximum *
45
33.2
44.3
39.8

* ... smaller is better

温度

尽管采用了被动散热,但在我们的测试中,笔记本电脑的表面温度并不苛刻,即使在满载的情况下,我们测得的最高温度也只有 45 °C。因此,在正常的日常使用中,MacBook Air 始终保持非常凉爽。即使是 35 瓦的电源也没有过热,最高温度为 43 °C。在综合 CPU/GPU 负载的压力测试中,SoC 的功耗最初为 29 瓦,但很快降至 9 瓦左右。

Max. Load
 42 °C44.9 °C37.4 °C 
 39.4 °C38.7 °C35.4 °C 
 33.4 °C29.7 °C31.8 °C 
Maximum: 44.9 °C
Average: 37 °C
39.1 °C43.9 °C41.2 °C
38.2 °C40.2 °C39 °C
32.2 °C33.5 °C33.7 °C
Maximum: 43.9 °C
Average: 37.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.1 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.5 °C / 95.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-7.3 °C / -13.1 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底部)
表面温度应力测试(底部)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Heat
1%
2%
6%
-21%
-12%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.9
44.3
1%
42.1
6%
45.4
-1%
46.2
-3%
43.6
3%
Maximum Bottom *
43.9
43.4
1%
39.5
10%
37.2
15%
41
7%
53.1
-21%
Idle Upper Side *
23.4
23.1
1%
24.5
-5%
22.4
4%
34
-45%
26.7
-14%
Idle Bottom *
23.5
23.3
1%
24.4
-4%
22
6%
33.8
-44%
27.2
-16%

* ... smaller is better

05101520Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø4 (3.391-14.396)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø3.02 (2.13-17.607)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø13.8 (9.944-20.067)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø5.15 (3.976-15.028)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø9.82 (7.515-15.154)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø15.4 (14.797-18.184)

发言人

Mac 的音响系统没有变化,仍然由 6 个扬声器组成,整体质量非常好,但竞争对手已经迎头赶上,达到了相当的水平。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.541.32531.532.53128.730.84036.335.65031.134.66328.739.78021.349.510021.754.412520.161.916018.856.420017.96425019.56831516.171.240013.270.750012.170.863012.27080011.368100010.868.412501172.6160011.174200011.472.4250011.669.4315012.172.5400012.377.1500012.677.1630012.776800012.876.9100001372.11250012.970.51600012.360.9SPL24.585.8N0.670median 12.6median 70.7Delta2.42.540.440.93140.530.138.233.538.732.137.534.539.323.94422.549.120.456.218.559.218.665.820.466.616.96913.167.611.768.811.175.810.480.51075.510.672.110.673.911.172.411.373.511.974.112.176.912.273.212.476.612.578.612.57812.975.212.164.724.487.50.678.2median 12.2median 73.52.94.631.428.331.424.322.524.319.720.819.722.42322.427.922.427.928.124.128.135.22235.24017.74046.518.246.553145356.813.956.862.414.262.464.516.464.565.113.165.169.311.269.367.310.367.366.210.166.270.19.570.170.79.370.771.29.471.270.29.770.267.810.167.87310.4736810.96867.511.567.561.211.961.262.412.162.465.612.565.665.312.165.360.412.560.48123.28151.30.551.3median 65.6median 11.9median 65.641.9433.63233.625.421.725.421.721.221.722.718.722.724.619.524.633.922.533.954.520.254.559.917.859.962.316.762.368.513.868.567.815.667.868.514.868.572.516.772.572.913.672.972.611.472.671.711.871.773.29.873.271.69.271.669.99.669.969.89.669.870.61070.675.310.375.373.110.873.169.211.269.271.111.371.166.411.466.468.511.768.568.911.768.970.411.570.467.21167.283.523.283.563.80.563.8median 69.9median 11.4median 69.92.21.82.236.242.428.534.227.53031.729.629.529.727.529.221.332.125.241.618.951.617.158.317.562.118.165.31563.612.562.911.364.711.969.310.771.810.769.110.767.410.864.911.167.511.865.112.167.412.463.312.569.212.767.112.969.413.271.91368.312.559.524.379.90.651median 12.5median 65.32.74.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook Air 15 M4Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionMicrosoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteLenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraAsus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量

其功耗值与前代机型基本相同。IPS 面板在全亮度条件下仍然需要相对较高的电量,Air 的耗电量也高于同类产品。在压力测试中,35 瓦的电源仅在几秒钟内起到了限制作用,总的来说是足够的,但同时为电池充电似乎没有太多的储备。可免费选配 70 瓦电源。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.17 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.2 / 11.5 / 11.6 Watt
Load midlight 34.5 / 37.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3"
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2880x1664, 15.6"
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3"
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ, IPS, 2496x1664, 15"
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3"
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"
Power Consumption
1%
-16%
-28%
-42%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
2.2
2.15
2%
2.4
-9%
3
-36%
3.4
-55%
4.4
-100%
Idle Average *
11.5
11.2
3%
3.9
66%
8.3
28%
8.8
23%
6.2
46%
Idle Maximum *
11.6
11.5
1%
5.1
56%
8.4
28%
9.3
20%
7.5
35%
Load Average *
34.5
35.8
-4%
42.5
-23%
34.3
1%
45.4
-32%
33.6
3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
24.4
43.5
-78%
45.8
-88%
49.4
-102%
39
-60%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
26.2
40.2
-53%
41
-56%
44.8
-71%
38.9
-48%
Load Maximum *
37.5
37.2
1%
64.4
-72%
65.2
-74%
66.3
-77%
69.3
-85%
Witcher 3 ultra *
29.6
29.9

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

05101520253035Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø36.4 (34.7-37.5)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.76 (4.73-4.92)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø24.4 (23.2-28.1)

Power consumption with external monitor

05101520253035Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø11.9 (11.2-16.5)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø29.7 (26.6-37.3)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.81 (2.77-2.91)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø26.2 (22.7-31.6)

运行时间

与旧型号相比,它的电池续航时间变化很小。在 150 cd/m² 的 WLAN 测试中,我们注意到它的续航时间为 16.5 小时,而在全亮度条件下,它的续航时间仅为 6:45 小时--这与它的消耗值相符。在视频测试中,Air 实现了近 19 个小时的运行时间。考虑到电池容量,这些结果都不错,但 ThinkPad X9 在所有情况下(尤其是最大亮度下)的续航时间都更长。在使用 35 瓦电源的情况下,其充电时间长达 02:44小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 28min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
6h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 54min
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3, M3 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 80 Wh
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 64 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 70 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
1%
14%
-10%
-5%
-22%
-21%
H.264
1134
1116
-2%
1378
22%
976
-14%
885
-22%
WiFi v1.3
988
1016
3%
1048
6%
889
-10%
1025
4%
783
-21%

Notebookcheck 总评分

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 - 03/11/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
88 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
91%
Pointing Device
99%
Connectivity
65 / 74 → 87%
Weight
69 / 20-77 → 86%
Battery
91%
Display
86%
Games Performance
58 / 75 → 78%
Application Performance
92 / 92 → 100%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
91 / 91 → 100%
Camera
48 / 75 → 64%
Average
75%
91%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
77.4%
Materials
50%
Packaging
100%
Power Use
90.4%
Repairability
0%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 61.3%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Height
Display
1.
91.2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 (10 cores) ⎘
Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $1,199.00
Apple 2025 MacBook Air 15-in...
2. $1,399.00
Apple 2024 MacBook Air 15-in...
3. $999.00
Apple 2025 MacBook Air 13-in...
List Price: 1999€
1.5 kg11.5 mm15.30"
2880x1864
224 PPI
IPS
2.
90.1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘
Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $1,534.49
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Gen 1 ...
2. $39.99
Smatree Hard EVA Protective ...
3. $43.99
Smatree Hard Laptop Sleeve f...
List Price: 1989€
1.4 kg17.7 mm15.30"
2880x1800
222 PPI
OLED
3.
84.3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD
Amazon: $1,399.99
List Price: 1100 USD
1.7 kg18.29 mm15.00"
2496x1664
200 PPI
IPS
4.
84.3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘
Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘
16 GB Memory
Amazon:
1. $10.99
KEANBOLL 3 Pack Designed for...
2. $15.88
MUBUY-GOL Anti Blue Light Sc...
3. $869.99
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X Copilot ...
List Price: 1380 USD
1.5 kg13.9 mm15.30"
2880x1800
222 PPI
IPS
5.
83.3%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $729.99
ASUS Vivobook S 15 15" 3K OL...
2. $799.99
ASUS Vivobook S 15 Laptop; C...
3. $799.00
ASUS Vivobook S 15 Business ...
List Price: 1299€
1.4 kg15.9 mm15.60"
2880x1620
212 PPI
OLED
6.
91.6% v7 (old)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 ⎘
Apple M3 10-Core GPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
List Price: 2059€
1.5 kg11.5 mm15.60"
2880x1664
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 评测--无风扇 M4 SoC 领先竞争对手多年
Andreas Osthoff, 2025-03-12 (Update: 2025-03-12)