data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ee4b/4ee4b09ae2b99ac907bba75487a71445275ef011" alt="Teaser"
联想 ThinkPad X9 15 灵光版笔记本电脑评测--即使没有 TrackPoint,MacBook Air 的竞争对手也非常出色
120 Hz OLED,1100 尼特。
联想的新款 ThinkPad X9 采用全新设计,电池续航时间长,OLED 屏幕性能卓越,令人信服。不过,联想也打破了传统,不再配备 TrackPoint。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
评语:ThinkPad X9 15 是一款非常出色的笔记本电脑,但它还是一款真正的 ThinkPad 吗?
在我们的评测中,新款联想 ThinkPad X9 15 被证明是一款非常出色的笔记本电脑。Lunar Lake 处理器的性能足以满足大多数日常需求,而且功耗非常低。再加上大容量电池,电池续航时间非常长,超过了 MacBook Air 15。铝制机身给人留下了非常精致和坚固的印象,但部件分离区的设计则是一个品味问题。不过,机身的其他部分倒是纤薄了许多。选择 Lunar Lake 处理器也意味着你最多只能获得 32 GB 内存,而且不能升级。
联想只为这款笔记本提供了一块 OLED 屏幕,它具有出色的图像质量和高亮度水平。我们在 SDR 内容下测得的亮度超过 500 尼特,在 HDR 模式下高达 1100 尼特,而且还获得了非常精确的 sRGB 和 P3 色彩空间配置文件,完全覆盖了这些色彩空间。虽然存在 PWM 闪烁,但频率很高,为 1.2 kHz,不会造成任何问题。
新款 X9 与所有其他 ThinkPad 机型的不同之处不仅仅在于机身设计,因为联想还决定更换输入设备。触觉触摸板非常出色,但键盘却存在问题。特别是键盘布局的改变(没有专门的上下翻页键),没有了四个功能键的组合,尤其是去掉了 TrackPoint,这对于 ThinkPad 的长期用户来说是个问题。键盘本身给人留下了良好的印象,只有空格键和回车键的质量稍有欠缺。
总而言之,ThinkPad X9 15 确实是一款不错的笔记本电脑,我们认为它也是目前最好的 Lunar Lake 笔记本电脑之一。ThinkPad 的名字显然更受欢迎,而且该机的质量也绝对符合人们对 X 系列 ThinkPad 的期望。如果联想的主要目标是为潜在的 MacBook Air 用户提供替代产品,那么我们认为 X9 是成功的。除了出色的屏幕,X9 还提供了更好的键盘和更长的电池续航时间,尤其是在使用高亮度设置时。不过,MacBook Air 仍然拥有被动散热的巨大优势。与微软的 Surface Laptop 等骁龙设备相比,你根本不用担心潜在的兼容性问题。
ThinkPad X9 并不便宜,但价格也不低,因为 1749 欧元的基本型号已经提供了出色的 OLED 屏幕、32 GB 内存和 1 TB SDD。如果你正在寻找一款具有出色画质、超长运行时间和良好音响系统的高品质伴侣,你一定要仔细看看新款 ThinkPad X9 15。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
你可以直接从联想美国公司购买新款 ThinkPad X9 15 灵光版,1359 美元起,配备酷睿 Ultra 5 处理器、16 GB 内存和 256 GB 固态硬盘。我们的测试机型售价为 2089 美元。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $39.99 Smatree Hard EVA Protective ... 2. $43.99 Smatree Hard Laptop Sleeve f... 3. $77.95 BoxWave Screen Protector Com... List Price: 1989€ | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 15.30" 2880x1800 222 PPI OLED | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,239.99 List Price: 1100 USD | 1.7 kg | 18.29 mm | 15.00" 2496x1664 200 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $10.99 KEANBOLL 3 Pack Designed for... 2. $1,199.99 Lenovo Slim 7i Aura Copilot+... 3. $897.99 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X Copilot ... List Price: 1380 USD | 1.5 kg | 13.9 mm | 15.30" 2880x1800 222 PPI IPS | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $699.00 ASUS Vivobook S 15 15" 3K OL... 2. $899.99 ASUS Vivobook S 15 Laptop; C... 3. $729.00 ASUS Vivobook S 15 Business ... List Price: 1299€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" 2880x1620 212 PPI OLED | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3 ⎘ Apple M3 10-Core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2059€ | 1.5 kg | 11.5 mm | 15.60" 2880x1664 IPS |
联想新推出的 ThinkPad X9 系列高端笔记本电脑与传统的 ThinkPad 机型不同,采用了新的铝制外壳和总体设计决策。这包括缺少 TrackPoint 和改变键盘布局,无论是 15 英寸还是 14 英寸机型(我们也将很快对其进行评测)。
我们今天的测试机是 ThinkPad X9 15 灵光版,配备英特尔酷睿 7 258V(Lunar Lake)、Arc Graphics 140V、32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 存储和 120 Hz OLED 屏幕,售价 2089 美元。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
机箱 - 轻薄铝制机箱
第一眼看上去,ThinkPad X9 对于 ThinkPad 来说并没有什么特别之处,因为我们已经了解了它的银色配色方案,如 ThinkPad X1 二合一.该设备看起来非常纤薄,只有当你把它转过来时,你才会看到所有端口和主要部件所在的分离区域(无论是厚度还是颜色)。我们认为这看起来不太协调,而且盖子上突出的摄像头凸起也不利于视觉效果。显示屏边框四周都很纤薄,表面也不易沾染灰尘。
不过,就质量而言,没有什么可抱怨的。底座非常坚固,根本无法扭动,只有中间的键盘区域在压力作用下会略微下压,但当你只是在键盘上打字时,这并不是问题。薄薄的盖子也非常稳固,无法扭动。铰链非常坚硬(最大开启角度为 170 度),单手即可打开。新款 ThinkPad X9 的整体制造质量非常出色,给人留下了非常精致的印象。
ThinkPad X9 15 仅重 1.408 千克,是我们对比组中最轻的设备,但不是最薄的。我们测量的最厚处为 17.7 毫米,最薄处约为 13 毫米。这意味着 MacBook Air 15 仍明显要纤薄一些。小巧的 65 瓦 PSU 重 276 克。
连接性 - 配备 Thunderbolt 4 和 Wi-Fi 7 的 ThinkPad X9
端口数量有限,但所有重要的标准都有。接口布局尚可,而且可以像普通 USB-A 端口一样在两侧为笔记本电脑充电,非常方便。不过,如果能在左侧增加一个 USB-C 端口就更好了。ThinkPad X9 是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑。
交流
英特尔的 Wi-Fi 模块(BE201)支持蓝牙 5.4 和最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准。我们使用华硕的参考路由器进行了测试,结果显示传输速率高且稳定。在评测期间,我们也没有发现无线信号有任何稳定性问题。联想没有为 ThinkPad X9 提供 5G/LTE 模块。
Networking | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
联想为 ThinkPad X9 配备了包括电子快门在内的 800 万像素传感器。支持最新的 Windows Studio 效果。图像质量总体不错,在清晰度方面比 1080p 网络摄像头有明显优势。此外,还配备了红外模块,可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3471/b3471fb39d35d4889dcf0d61f4d10aa7e8fbbc45" alt="ColorChecker"
维护
可持续性
输入设备 - 无 TrackPoint,但有触觉触摸板
新款 ThinkPad X9 15 的输入设备可能是讨论最多的话题之一,因为联想与所有其他 ThinkPad 型号都有很大的不同。从布局开始,从缺少四个 F 键到缺少专用的上下翻页键,整体布局更倾向于消费类设备。按键的形状也焕然一新,因为底部的轻微弧度不见了,取而代之的是略微倾斜的下边缘。
总之,新键盘的键入体验非常舒适,尽管键程只有 1.35 毫米,但精确的反馈还是让我们感到惊喜。唯一的两个例外是空格键和回车键,它们的响声更大,而且声音也更大。联想肯定应该再检查一下这两个键。电源键(包括指纹扫描仪)位于右上角,用手指很容易找到。白色背景照明有两个强度级别,可通过传感器进行调节。
显示屏 - 1100 尼特 OLED
联想只为 ThinkPad X9 15 提供 15.3 英寸 OLED 屏幕(2880 x 1800 像素、120 Hz、16:10),也可以与触摸屏组合(升级费用为 50 美元)。光面屏幕(根据面板 ID,来自三星)的主观画质非常出色,明亮的图像上没有网格效应。由于采用了 120 Hz 的频率,屏幕的移动非常流畅,尽管我们可以在亮度低于 77 % 时检测到 PWM 闪烁,但频率非常高,为 1.2 kHz,应该不会造成任何问题。
我们测量到的 SDR 亮度水平超过 500 尼特,再加上 OLED 典型的低黑度,对比度非常高。我们对 HDR 性能感到惊讶,因为我们测量到小区域的亮度高达 1100 尼特(几乎全白的画面亮度为 680 尼特),这比竞争对手提供的要高得多。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 509 cd/m²
Contrast: 50900:1 (Black: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
94.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition ATNA53JB01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Sharp LQ150P1JX61, IPS, 2496x1664, 15", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura CSOT T3 MNF307ZB1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon ATNA56AC03-0, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 IPS, 2880x1664, 15.6", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | -3% | |||
Display P3 Coverage | 100 | 98.8 -1% | 98.7 -1% | ||
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | ||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94.6 | 87.5 -8% | 87.8 -7% | ||
Response Times | -4864% | -2859% | -25% | -2882% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.46 ? | 44.4 ? -2941% | 27 ? -1749% | 0.61 ? 58% | 35.3 ? -2318% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.44 ? | 30.3 ? -6786% | 17.9 ? -3968% | 0.67 ? -52% | 15.6 ? -3445% |
PWM Frequency | 1200 ? | 240 ? -80% | |||
Screen | -419% | -428% | -24% | -468% | |
Brightness middle | 509 | 579.9 14% | 509 0% | 378 -26% | 526 3% |
Brightness | 508 | 576 13% | 479 -6% | 379 -25% | 506 0% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 92 -5% | 90 -7% | 98 1% | 92 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.01 | 0.34 -3300% | 0.32 -3100% | 0.02 -100% | 0.37 -3600% |
Contrast | 50900 | 1706 -97% | 1591 -97% | 18900 -63% | 1422 -97% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 0.96 13% | 2.47 -125% | 1 9% | 1.4 -27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.5 | 2.39 4% | 4.73 -89% | 2.6 -4% | 2 20% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.4 7% | 1.5 -0% | 1.2 20% | 2.1 -40% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.19 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6294 103% | 6407 101% | 6790 96% | 6460 101% | 6865 95% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.06 | 0.6 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2642% /
-1308% | -1097% /
-704% | -25% /
-24% | -1118% /
-732% |
* ... smaller is better
根据联想的说法,该面板在出厂时已经校准,我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件测试了这一说法。X-Rite Color Assistant 软件提供了不同的色彩配置文件,与现代华硕 OLED 机型类似,默认配置文件显示的色彩略微过饱和。不过,还有一个用于图片编辑的非常精确的 P3 配置文件以及一个 sRGB 配置文件。OLED 面板完全覆盖了这两种色彩空间,因此 ThinkPad X9 15 是图片/视频编辑的绝佳选择。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.24 ms rise | |
↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise | |
↘ 0.76 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1200 Hz Amplitude: 22 % | ≤ 77 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 77 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1200 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8600 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 配备 32GB 内存的 Lunar Lake 处理器
ThinkPad X9 15 可配备不同的 Lunar Lake 处理器(包括 vPro),以及 16 或 32 GB 内存(LPDDR5x-8533)。
审查设置
联想的智能散热与标准的 Windows 电源模式相连。我们在 "最佳性能"模式下进行了基准测试和测量。
模式 | CPU TDP | CB R23 Multi | Steel Nomad Light | CP2077 1080p Med | 最大风扇噪音 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
最佳电源效率 | 37/12 瓦 | 6697 分 | 2929 分 | 24,4 fps | 30.3 dB(A) |
平衡 | 37/16 瓦 | 7839 分 | 3223 分 | 37 fps | 37.4 dB(A) |
最佳性能 | 37/25 瓦 | 10138 点 | 3227 点 | 37.5 fps | 45 dB(A) |
处理器 - Core Ultra 7 258V
英特尔 酷睿至尊 7 258V(Lunar Lake)提供八个 CPU 内核,正如我们在之前的众多评测中看到的那样,多核性能只能算一般。在 ThinkPad X9 上,CPU 的功耗最高可达 37 瓦,约 40 秒后功耗降至 25 瓦。单核性能非常有竞争力,与骁龙处理器的竞争对手不相上下,但Apple 的 M3 SoC 在这方面更快,即将推出的 M4 代将进一步扩大优势。酷睿至尊 7 258V 仍能为日常任务提供充足的性能。在电池电量充足的情况下性能稳定,但当 CPU 功耗达到 25 瓦时,多核性能在持续工作负载下会下降约 13%。其他 CPU 基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition |
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura -2! | |
Average of class Office | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 -9! | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9114 - 11097, n=7) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 20399, n=89, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1664 - 1918, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (3530 - 4314, n=7) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average of class Office (590 - 8086, n=88, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (643 - 734, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (246 - 3132, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1550 - 1656, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (258 - 294, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (98 - 290, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Average of class Office (163 - 1956, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (315 - 414, n=7) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 76886, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (32198 - 36724, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (5547 - 5865, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (10.5 - 14.2, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 20.8, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (44.9 - 59.3, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (0.4457 - 0.4715, n=7) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9215 - 12781, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (763 - 31245, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (48758 - 63401, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 125394, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2271 - 2817, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (287 - 5398, n=89, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (49536 - 49818, n=7) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Office (404 - 18321, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4103 - 4429, n=7) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (25361 - 33565, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 66922, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (37860 - 40753, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1366, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (499 - 632, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4891 - 6930, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (432 - 17834, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (51458 - 54971, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=89, last 2 years) |
系统性能
系统的整体性能非常好,所有输入都能快速执行。合成基准测试成绩也很好,我们在评测过程中没有遇到任何稳定性问题。与 Snapdragon 笔记本电脑相反,您不必担心应用程序的兼容性问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 7066, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7578, n=81, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 10557, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9287, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=81, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9728 - 10008, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (2049 - 11108, n=81, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1623 - 1742, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1558 - 1684, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1846 - 1977, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1251 - 1338, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (260 - 312, n=6) | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=83, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (251 - 287, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=83, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Office (399 - 1966, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (468 - 559, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7023 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (107767 - 108783, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=90, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89204, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=90, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (112837 - 117935, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (7.6 - 185.2, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95.2 - 101.1, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的评测机配备的是 1 TB 型号的 WD SN740(M.2-2242),在初始设置后,你可以使用 893 GB 来存储自己的文件和应用程序。PCIe-4.0 固态硬盘的性能一般,在持续工作负载下传输速率会有波动,但对日常使用影响不大。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
英特尔 Arc Graphics 140V这是一款功能强大的集成图形适配器,可轻松处理包括高分辨率视频播放在内的常见日常任务。原始性能略优于 Radeon 890M和 Adreno X1-85和 Adreno X1-85 相比,原始性能略胜一筹,但Apple M3 GPU 仍保持领先。您还可以使用 140V 玩一些游戏,在 1080p 和中等设置下,许多游戏都能达到流畅的帧率。无论是在电池供电还是在持续工作负载下,GPU 性能都非常稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里.
3DMark: 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | Steel Nomad Light Score
Geekbench 6.4: GPU OpenCL | GPU Vulkan | GPU Metal
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
3DMark 11 / Performance GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (10499 - 11506, n=10) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (1468 - 16418, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
3DMark / Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6790 - 10006, n=11) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average of class Office (736 - 9810, n=88, last 2 years) |
3DMark / Time Spy Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (2955 - 4227, n=14) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (313 - 4109, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (2596 - 3406, n=4) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (366 - 3227, n=9, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.4 / GPU OpenCL | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (21831 - 30397, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average of class Office (3059 - 43511, n=76, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.4 / GPU Vulkan | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (19700 - 207733, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (1452 - 46309, n=76, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.4 / GPU Metal | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (4900 - 7647, n=6) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average of class Office (203 - 7401, n=18, last 2 years) |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6982 - 7068, n=2) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (201 - 7068, n=17, last 2 years) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 11737 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8832 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3547 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 808 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3227 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Office (245 - 3964, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (509 - 700, n=9) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
Average of class Office (230 - 416, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (210 - 217, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (6.65 - 28.2, n=32, last 2 years) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=77, last 2 years) |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (4.18 - 35.7, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (9.6 - 58.7, n=68, last 2 years) |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (8.88 - 92.6, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 154.3 | 150.1 | 66.9 | 27.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 86.2 | 65.1 | 41.1 | 73.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 86.6 | 48.4 | 35 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 48.9 | 36.7 | 29.8 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 236 | 84 | 69.8 | 58.7 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 36.6 | 30.6 | 25.7 | 25.5 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 45.5 | 37.5 | 32.4 | 28.2 |
F1 24 (2024) | 82.7 | 79 | 61.5 | 20.2 |
排放 - 非常好的音响系统
系统噪音
这两个风扇通常在空转和简单工作时关闭。不过,当你开始对 CPU 施加更大压力时,风扇会很快达到 35-39 dB(A) 之间的水平,这也是短期功率限制过高(在所有功率模式下)的结果。在这方面肯定还有改进的余地。压力测试开始时,我们测得的噪音高达 45 dB(A),但很快就降到了 42.2 dB(A)。在其他两种功率模式下,该设备的噪音明显较低(分别为 37.4 和 30.3 dB(A))。被动冷却 MacBook Air15 在这方面显然有很大优势。我们在评测设备上没有发现任何其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.4 / 24.4 / 24.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 35.8 / 45 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 14% | 5% | 4% | ||
off / environment * | 24.4 | 23.3 5% | 23.2 5% | 24.3 -0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 24.4 | 23.3 5% | 23.2 5% | 24.3 -0% | |
Idle Average * | 24.4 | 23.3 5% | 23.2 5% | 24.3 -0% | |
Idle Maximum * | 24.4 | 23.3 5% | 26.1 -7% | 26.2 -7% | |
Load Average * | 35.8 | 25.7 28% | 30.9 14% | 32.5 9% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 39.4 | 31.1 21% | 34.1 13% | 35.2 11% | |
Load Maximum * | 45 | 33.2 26% | 44.3 2% | 39.8 12% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+0.2 °C / 0.4 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 4% | -23% | -15% | -1% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.1 | 45.4 -8% | 46.2 -10% | 43.6 -4% | 44.3 -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 39.5 | 37.2 6% | 41 -4% | 53.1 -34% | 43.4 -10% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.5 | 22.4 9% | 34 -39% | 26.7 -9% | 23.1 6% |
Idle Bottom * | 24.4 | 22 10% | 33.8 -39% | 27.2 -11% | 23.3 5% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - ThinkPad X9 非常高效
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ, IPS, 2496x1664, 15" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3" | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2880x1664, 15.6" | Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -27% | -41% | -23% | -49% | -31% | -50% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.4 | 3 -25% | 3.4 -42% | 4.4 -83% | 2.15 10% | 3.66 ? -53% | 4.5 ? -88% |
Idle Average * | 3.9 | 8.3 -113% | 8.8 -126% | 6.2 -59% | 11.2 -187% | 5.89 ? -51% | 7.47 ? -92% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.1 | 8.4 -65% | 9.3 -82% | 7.5 -47% | 11.5 -125% | 8.1 ? -59% | 9 ? -76% |
Load Average * | 42.5 | 34.3 19% | 45.4 -7% | 33.6 21% | 35.8 16% | 39.9 ? 6% | 42.3 ? -0% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 43.5 | 45.8 -5% | 49.4 -14% | 39 10% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 40.2 | 41 -2% | 44.8 -11% | 38.9 3% | |||
Load Maximum * | 64.4 | 65.2 -1% | 66.3 -3% | 69.3 -8% | 37.2 42% | 62.2 ? 3% | 62 ? 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 29.9 | 29.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumption with external screen
电池运行时间
联想使用的是 80 Wh 电池,再加上低耗电值,因此电池续航时间非常长。我们的 Wi-Fi 测试在 150 尼特(测试机最大 SDR 亮度的 60%)和 60 Hz 下运行了约 17.5 小时,在全 SDR 亮度(60 Hz)下运行了 9.5 小时。这些结果击败了竞争对手,包括 Surface Laptop 15 甚至 MacBook Air 15 M3 等 ARM 竞争对手。最糟糕的情况下,电池耗尽时间为 2:14 小时。
设备开机后,完全充电需要 115 分钟,74 分钟后可充满 80% 的电量。我们将在接下来的几天里增加更多的电池测试(视频播放、HDR 视频、120 Hz 下的 WiFi 测试)。
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 80 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 64 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 70 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3, M3 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -19% | 4% | -27% | 8% | -27% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 1048 | 889 -15% | 1025 -2% | 783 -25% | 1016 -3% | 635 ? -39% |
Load | 134 | 104 -22% | 148 10% | 97 -28% | 159 19% | 114.8 ? -14% |
H.264 | 976 | 885 | 1116 | 725 ? |
笔记本检查评级
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
- 02/24/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.