Apple MacBook Air M2评测--更快的10核GPU并不值得购买
我们已经能够广泛地测试新的MacBook Air M2,现在我们的测试中有一个配备更快的10核GPU和更多存储的型号。这是星光色的配置,带有更快的M2芯片,16GB的共享工作内存,以及一个大的1TB SSD。在这次审查中,我们主要想集中讨论与基本型号的区别。对于其他部分,如外壳、设备、输入设备、显示器和扬声器,我们请你参考我们对基本版的评论,因为在这些方面没有差异。
我们已经知道,新的MacBook Air M2的价格已经明显提高。我们这里有一个装备精良的模型(建议零售价2,309欧元,约合2,380美元),你已经进入了一个 MacBook Pro 14的范围,它在许多方面(性能、Mini-LED显示屏、连接、扬声器)显然更有优势。配备16GB内存和512GB固态硬盘的MBP 14基本型号目前在市场上的售价约为1950至2000欧元(约合2,010-2,061美元),而配备1TB固态硬盘的型号售价约为2,300欧元(约合2,371美元),这与我们的Air M2测试单元的价格相同。当然,Air的目标受众不同,移动性更好,但我们也将Pro列入我们的比较图表中。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
92 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 | |
92.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2, M2 8-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 | |
91.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 1.4 kg | 15.6 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
92.7 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
90.1 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 1.1 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" | 3840x2400 |
案例--星光色明显不容易受影响
随着新的 午夜色的MacBook Air M2我们确定,虽然深蓝色看起来非常好,但它也非常容易受到灰尘和指纹的影响。目前的测试设备也是新的星光色版本(银色,略带金色),在这些方面明显不容易受到影响,更符合已知的银色和太空灰的版本。
在我们对基本版本的评论中,我们已经提到,尽管新的MacBook Air M2非常苗条,但它仍然比直接竞争对手,如 戴尔XPS 13 Plus或 华硕ZenBook S 13.如果我们也把它与 MacBook Pro 14的对比,Pro主观上显得明显更笨重,当然也更厚,而且重了约400克(约0.9磅)。然而,就纯粹的占地面积而言,两者的差别并不是很大。
显示屏 - 一个没有时间抖动的IPS面板
我们请你参考我们的对基本版的评论了解有关显示的信息。在评论区,我们被问及时间性抖动(它被用来创造更多色彩深度的错觉)。因此,我们用显微镜检查了Air M2的IPS面板,并创建了一个每秒240张图像的慢动作记录。虽然我们能够检测到时间上的抖动,例如,在目前的 采用Mini-LED面板的MacBook Pro 16在一些特定的灰色色调中,这在旧的MacBook Air M1中并不存在。 MacBook Air M1和新的MacBook Air M2都没有这种情况。
性能 -Apple M2,有10个GPU核心
处理器
由于新MacBook Air的处理器模块无论配置如何始终保持不变(共有8个核心,由4个性能核心和4个效率核心组成),我们可以在这里简单介绍一下。性能基本上是相同的。在Cinebench循环中,我们看到基本型号在几次运行后有轻微的优势,在最后的运行中,高端Air的速度也是最小的。然而,这也可以用芯片本身的正常差异来解释。在实践中,这种差异是不明显的。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Apple 由于比M1处理器的时钟速度更高,因此能够提高单核和多核性能,但你也要为它付出更高的功耗。我们已经在另一篇文章中表明 另一篇文章因此,在处理器性能方面,M2也不像它的前辈那样高效运行。
然而,新的M2芯片总体上对日常工作产生的性能绰绰有余,即使与MacBook Air的被动冷却相结合。事实上,新的Air M2几乎能够与 8核M1 Pro的MacBook Pro 14,至少在简短的多核基准测试中,尽管Pro 14的性能仍然完全稳定,没有下降。
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry -3! | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Average Apple M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average Apple M2 (8517 - 8772, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M2 (1580 - 1638, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Average Apple M2 (2231 - 2416, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M2 (216 - 446, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Average Apple M2 (1210 - 1243, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average Apple M2 (222 - 229, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M2 (549 - 713, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average Apple M2 (8491 - 8994, n=8) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average Apple M2 (1887 - 1953, n=8) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
在主观性能方面,我们最初并没有注意到与MacBook Air M2基本款的任何区别。 基本型号的MacBook Air M2特别是在日常工作中,如写邮件、播放视频或上网冲浪。然而,在一些基准测试中,更大的存储空间和更快的SSD变得很明显。基本上,模拟程序通过Rosetta 2运行也没有任何问题,但是Apple 芯片的原生应用程序通常更快,资源效率更高。一个很好的例子是Adobe Photoshop和Premiere Pro应用程序,它们都可以接受英特尔版本的运行,但明显比原生应用程序慢。 因此,PugetBench的结果也只有有限的用途,但它们仍然显示出与MacBook Air M2的基本型号相比,增加的工作内存和更快的SSD的优势。
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K Metal | 12:1 8K CPU
Photoshop PugetBench: Overall Score | GPU Score | General Score | Filter Score
Premiere Pro PugetBench: Overall Score 0.9 | Export 0.9 | Live Playback 0.9 | GPU 0.9
Jetstream 2: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Speedometer 2.0: Result
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1437 - 1585, n=8) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1319 - 1441, n=8) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1765 - 1967, n=8) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1008 - 1182, n=8) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (59 - 85, n=4) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (59 - 67, n=3, last 2 years) |
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (25 - 32, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (24 - 26, n=4) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (747 - 828, n=3) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry |
Photoshop PugetBench / GPU Score | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (75.6 - 83.8, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry |
Photoshop PugetBench / General Score | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (78.7 - 86.6, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry |
Photoshop PugetBench / Filter Score | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (62.8 - 86.9, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) |
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Overall Score 0.9 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (500 - 537, n=2) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry |
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Export 0.9 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (45.4 - 48, n=2) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Live Playback 0.9 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (79.5 - 81.8, n=2) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry |
Premiere Pro PugetBench / GPU 0.9 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (24.2 - 26.2, n=2) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry |
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Average of class Subnotebook (117 - 478, n=36, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (220 - 257, n=8) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (342 - 387, n=7) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (223 - 256, n=7) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (437 - 445, n=9) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (110 - 674, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
存储解决方案
在所有关于新的MacBook型号的256-GB固态硬盘的讨论之后,MacBook Air M2中的1-TB SD再次达到了超过3GB/s的通常传输率。然而,即使是这样也不是目前的技术水平,因为尽管1-TB SSD的溢价很高,达到460欧元(约474美元),但它仍然使用过时的PCIe 3.0连接。更大的MacBook Pro 14在这里有明显的优势,因为它已经使用更快的PCIe 4.0型号。
图形卡
除了内核数量之外,新的GPU没有任何区别。 Apple M2Apple ,因为8核的基本型号和更快的10核版本的核心都达到了1,398 MHz的最高时钟速度。与旧版M1相比,M2的图形性能总体上得到了改善,与CPU核心相比,Apple ,成功地略微提高了提高了效率这里。
然而,在13.5瓦左右,功耗总体上仍然略有增加。这导致在恒定负载下,例如在游戏过程中,图形性能必须比基本型号的情况更快、更强地降低。其结果是,与M2的8核GPU相比,几分钟后,优势从19%缩减到只有约9% 。
因此,只有在短期的基准测试中才会有真正的优势。在日常操作中,8核GPU已经绰绰有余。因此,没有真正的理由要为10核GPU支付额外的费用。 10核GPU在新的MacBook Air M2中。然而,我们也想与更大的MacBook Pro 14做一个简单的比较 MacBook Pro 14这里,即使是 14核GPU的基本型号也至少快30-40%,而且在这个性能水平上也保持不变。
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 60 | 28 | 25 | 21 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 88.6 | 46.3 | 26.3 | 15.9 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 53.1 | 34.2 | 23.8 | 16.4 |
排放和电源管理
噪声排放
当然,更昂贵的MacBook Air M2也是被动冷却的,所以它在运行过程中保持完全安静。我们也无法检测到任何其他电子噪音。
温度
由于两款机型的被动冷却系统是相同的,所以在表面温度方面也没有实际差异。反正在日常操作中没有任何问题,即使在高负荷下,Apple ,也能很好地控制机箱温度,所以你仍然可以将MacBook Air M2放在腿上运行而没有任何担心。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.1 °C / 95.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.8 °C / -12.3 F).
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU | Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | 1% | 3% | -12% | -7% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.7 | 44.5 -0% | 45.1 -1% | 46.8 -5% | 47.9 -7% | 41.1 8% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.6 | 44.4 -0% | 43 4% | 40.9 8% | 56.1 -26% | 48.8 -9% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.1 | 23.9 5% | 25.2 -0% | 24.2 4% | 26.8 -7% | 28 -12% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.3 | 23.6 7% | 25.4 -0% | 24.2 4% | 27.3 -8% | 29.3 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在我们的压力测试中,我们看到基本上与基本模型中的行为相同。在开始时,M2被允许短暂地消耗约33瓦,然后消耗迅速下降,最后也较快地平息在一个略低的封装功率,不到9瓦。这在下面的图表中也很容易看到,该图表将我们压力测试中的两款MacBook Air M2的封装功率、CPU功率和GPU功率进行了相互比较。
然而,这里也有一种情况,即性能完全可以满足日常任务的需要,MacBook Air M2根本不是为持续负载而设计的。那些想要不断获取M2的全部性能的人将无法避免主动冷却的 MacBook Pro 13 M2.
发言人
我们在基本型号的测试中已经看到,MacBook Air M2的新的扬声器系统再次非常好,但与之前的相比,并不代表明显的改进。 MacBook Air M1.这款 MacBook Pro 14带附加模块的MacBook Pro 14在这里再次表现得更好,只有更大的MacBook Pro 16才超过它。 MacBook Pro 16.
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
消耗功率
在我们的测量中,在空闲运行期间,更昂贵的MacBook Air M2版本比基本版本的耗电量略高。在这里,芯片之间的差异可能发挥了作用,但我们的测试装置也有更多的存储/RAM模块,也需要电源。一旦你在MacBook上施加更重的负载,你将再次清楚地看到35瓦的充电器是限制因素。使用100瓦的充电器,我们能够看到最大功耗略高于55瓦,之后也有一段时间是~38瓦。
在更昂贵的MacBook Air M2型号中,还包括新的双USB-C充电器。这对大多数用户来说应该是完全足够的,而且第二个USB-C连接在许多情况下也会有帮助。作为选择(没有额外费用),你也可以切换到更强大的67瓦充电器,这尤其对充电时间有积极影响,因为新的MacBook Air M2届时也将支持更快的充电。
30% | 50% | 80% | 90% | 100% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
30瓦的充电器 | 41分钟 | 69分钟 | 111分钟 | 126分钟 | 147分钟 |
35瓦的充电器 | 34分钟 | 57分钟 | 92分钟 | 108分钟 | 122分钟 |
100瓦的充电器 | 17分钟 | 28分钟 | 51分钟 | 66分钟 | 85分钟 |
Off / Standby | 0.16 / 0.32 Watt |
Idle | 1.9 / 9.6 / 9.7 Watt |
Load |
32.4 / 35.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512 | Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 8% | -2% | -55% | -44% | -87% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.9 | 1.87 2% | 1.77 7% | 2.9 -53% | 4.8 -153% | 7 -268% |
Idle Average * | 9.6 | 9.2 4% | 6.7 30% | 11.6 -21% | 8.7 9% | 11 -15% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.7 | 9.3 4% | 6.9 29% | 11.9 -23% | 10.1 -4% | 11.4 -18% |
Load Average * | 32.4 | 28.5 12% | 30.9 5% | 49.5 -53% | 45.6 -41% | 59.7 -84% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.8 | 27.4 11% | 38.9 -26% | 58.2 -89% | 42.4 -38% | 49.4 -60% |
Load Maximum * | 35.7 | 31 13% | 56 -57% | 68.5 -92% | 49.5 -39% | 63 -76% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
由于功耗略高,测量的电池寿命也比基本型号的情况略差。然而,如果将显示亮度调整到150cd/m²,在WLAN测试和播放视频时的运行时间仍然非常好。在全亮度下,电池寿命明显缩短。
与 MacBook Pro 14在这里又很有趣,因为尽管在150cd/m²的情况下运行时间缩短了一小时,但当MacBook Pro 14调整到全SDR亮度时(与新的MacBook Air M2的亮度相当),其持续时间甚至略长。虽然新的Air M2在WLAN测试中没有完全持续6小时,但MacBook Pro 14能够持续6.5小时。
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2, M2 8-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 58.2 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, 69.9 Wh | Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 67 Wh | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 4% | 26% | -7% | -21% | -42% | -11% | |
H.264 | 946 | 989 5% | 1153 22% | 900 -5% | 912 -4% | 657 -31% | 911 ? -4% |
WiFi v1.3 | 884 | 910 3% | 1144 29% | 816 -8% | 550 -38% | 414 -53% | 727 ? -18% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 升级后的MacBook Air M2太贵了
在我们已经测试了 基本版的新MacBook Air M2广泛,现在的升级只能在有限的程度上给我们留下深刻印象。由于新的256-GB驱动器的速度问题,特别是更大更快的固态硬盘对消费者来说可能最有意义。然而,我们仍然要对Apple ,这是一个PCIe 3.0的连接,而不是更快的PCIe 4.0驱动器,尽管有高昂的额外费用。此外,我们认为1499欧元(约1545美元)的基本版本应该已经配备了512GB的固态硬盘。升级到更多的工作内存可能也是有意义的,特别是如果你经常使用第三方软件(如谷歌浏览器,有一堆打开的标签)或仿真软件。
另一方面,在我们看来,更快的GPU是完全没有意义的。在功能上,与基本型号没有区别,而且几分钟后性能优势已经大大缩水,因此在游戏时,例如,与8核GPU相比已经没有明显优势。虽然在短期基准测试中存在约20%的优势,但这在实践中并没有多大的区别,因为更快的GPU由于更高的功耗也必须更快地节流。那些想持续利用M2的全部图形性能的人,不得不选择 MacBook Pro 13 M2配备主动冷却装置。
新款MacBook Air M2中更快的10核GPU的额外溢价并不值得。即使内存和固态硬盘的升级非常昂贵,因为这是典型的Apple ,尤其是固态硬盘升级到至少512GB,绝对值得推荐。如果你随后也升级工作内存,你最终会进入明显更强大和装备更好的MacBook Pro 14的价格范围。
然而,新的MacBook Air M2在升级后最大的问题是价格,因为目前MacBook Air M2的价格略高于配备类似设备的 MacBook Pro 14(起价约为1,950欧元(约合2,010美元),配备16GB内存和512GB固态硬盘),尽管它具有许多优势(更多的连接,明显更高的性能,具有高HDR亮度的Mini-LED面板,更好的扬声器)。新款Air M2的占地面积并没有小多少(新款Air也是由 华硕ZenBook S 13和 戴尔XPS 13 Plus这里的竞争对手)。唯一两个真正的优势是外壳明显更薄,重量也轻了约400克(约0.9磅)。因此,那些不一定需要最轻的MacBook,并愿意支付约2000欧元(约合人民币2061元)的人,也许更适合使用MacBook Pro 14。
但所有这些都不能改变一个事实,即更昂贵的MacBook Air M2版本在日常操作中也非常好用,而且也只是一个非常好的副笔记本。虽然你肯定可以就性价比进行辩论,但这在设备质量的评估中并没有起到任何作用。
价格和可用性
MacBook Air M2可以在Apple Store进行配置。并有1199美元起的价格。我们的测试配置为1,899美元。 亚马逊也列出了一个1499美元的版本。
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
- 08/11/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff