Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 评测：M4 Pro 和雾面显示屏的巨大升级
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
评价：性能更强，终于有了雾面显示屏
由于采用了全新的 M4 Pro SoC，2024 版 MacBook Pro 14 的性能得到了大幅提升，在很多情况下，其处理器性能都超过了旧款旗舰产品 M3 Max。同时，其功耗也有所下降。这是一项了不起的成就，Apple ，进一步扩大了其在多核和单核性能方面的领先优势。新 GPU 的速度也提高了约 30%。
当然，其他亮点还包括它的磨砂显示屏选项。如果你经常在明亮的环境或户外使用 MacBook，那么它的画质依然令人印象深刻，而屏幕的哑光表面则改变了游戏规则。此外，Apple ，在使用环境光传感器时，SDR 亮度提高到了 1000 尼特以上。除此以外，迷你 LED 面板在许多方面--从高亮度到处理 HDR 内容的出色程度--仍然是值得借鉴的。
在日常使用中，MacBook Pro 14 可以长时间保持静音或至少是非常安静，电池续航时间依然很短。不过，与 M3 代相比，我们还找不到任何真正的改进。
总的来说，M4 Pro 比上一代产品需要更多的电能，这就是为什么笔记本电脑在负载情况下表面温度会很高，尤其是在键盘区域。此外，M4 Pro 缺乏维护选项，再加上Apple 在内存/存储升级方面的巨额附加费用，这些都是它的缺点。它的键盘也仍有改进的余地。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
新款 MacBook Pro 14 从 2024 年 11 月 8 日开始接受预订。你可以直接通过Apple 网站购买，配备 24GB 内存和 512GB 固态硬盘的小型 M4 Pro 机型售价为 1999 美元。
亚马逊（Amazon）等在线零售商也有售，目前相同型号的售价为 1,949 美元。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Geizhals | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 91.8%  | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 20-core GPU ⎘ 48 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" 3024x1964 254 PPI MiniLED | |
2. 92.8% v7 (old)  | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core ⎘ Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" 3024x1964 254 PPI Mini-LED | |
3. 89.8% v7 (old)  | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 1.7 kg | 17.6 mm | 14.50" 3072x1920 250 PPI Mini-LED | |
4. 86.3% v7 (old)  | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Listenpreis 2949€ Geizhals Suche | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 14.50" 3200x2000 260 PPI OLED |
5. 89.7% v7 (old)  | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Listenpreis 2700 USD Geizhals Suche | 1.9 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 216 PPI IPS |
6. 93% v7 (old)  | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 1.5 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
7. 85.5% v7 (old)  | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 Intel Core i7-13700H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 2 kg | 22 mm | 14.40" 2400x1600 200 PPI IPS |
Apple MacBook Pro 推出了 2024 机型，不出所料，该机型采用了新一代 M4 处理器。继普通 M4 SoC 在 iPad Pro 上首次亮相后，M4 Pro/Max 版本也已上市。除了性能更强之外，这也是你第一次可以使用 Thunderbolt 5。配备 M4 Pro 的全新 MacBook Pro 14 的起售价为 1,999 美元。我们测试样品的价格约为 3,350 美元。它配备了速度更快的 M4 Pro 变体、48 GB 内存、2 TB 固态硬盘以及我们从 iMac 上已经了解到的全新纳米纹理玻璃。
规格
外壳 - MacBook Pro 现在只有黑色和银色两种颜色
2024 版 MacBook Pro 14 现在只有银色或黑色，无论你选择哪种处理器。太空灰不再是可选颜色。除此之外，我们注意到其外壳设计没有任何变化。特别是 14 英寸版 MacBook Pro，由于其底座高度不变的形状，看起来相对笨重，但厚度并不过分，仅为 15.5 毫米。采用一体式机身结构的 MacBook 仍然拥有出色的制造质量。不过，与银色机型相比，黑色机型更容易藏污纳垢。
铰链将屏幕盖固定得非常牢固，调整角度时几乎不会晃动，但显示屏的最大开启角度仍然只有 135 度。显示屏顶部边框的凹槽看起来还是不太美观，但即便如此，与竞争对手产品上的许多摄像头凸起相比，我们还是更喜欢这种解决方案。我们也注意到在这方面没有任何功能限制。
连接性 - Thunderbolt 5 和 1200 万像素摄像头
配备 M4 Pro/M4 Max 的 MacBook Pro 14 的基本连接性没有太大变化，因为除了三个 USB-C 端口外，它还有一个完整的 HDMI 输出、用于充电的 MagSafe 和一个全尺寸 SD 读卡器。不过，M4 Pro/M4 Max 的配置现在已经支持最大传输速率为 120 GB/s 的 Thunderbolt 5。M4 Pro 支持向两个外部显示器（除内置屏幕外）输出图像，而 M4 Max 最多支持四个外部显示器。
SD 读卡器
右侧的读卡器不能完全接收 SD 卡，因此不适合用于永久存储扩展。它与我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）配合使用的速度非常快，我们测得的最高速度为 231 MB/s，复制图像文件时的速度为 161 MB/s。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
交流
它的 Wi-Fi 模块没有任何变化，仍然支持 Wi-Fi 6E 标准和蓝牙 5.3。与华硕的参考路由器配合使用时，它的传输速率非常好且稳定，但它还不支持更新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准。Apple ，它仍然没有为 MacBook Pro 提供任何蜂窝网络选项（LTE/5G）。
| Networking | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
网络摄像头现在配备了 1200 万像素传感器，因此分辨率比以前（200 万像素）高出很多。此外，网络摄像头现在还支持跟随模式（图像随着人的移动而移动）和桌面视图，在桌面视图中，除了常规显示屏外，笔记本电脑前面的区域也会被记录下来，例如用于显示产品。不过，使用 PhotoBooth 应用程序截图的分辨率仍然很低（1,440 x 960 像素），而且录制的质量也没有比以前好多少，这同样适用于视频（最大 1080p）。仍然不支持 Face ID。
维护
机箱底盖可以拆卸，但除了清洁风扇外，你什么也做不了，因为所有部件都是焊接上去的。
可持续性
Apple 提供了大量有关其环保工作的信息，并在其 网站上为 MacBook Pro 14 提供了一份单独的报告。https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/products/notebooks/MacBook_Pro_14-inch_PER_Oct2024.pdf.例如，其包装完全采用无塑料包装，MacBook 本身也主要由可回收材料制成。不过，用户没有维护或升级选项。
输入设备 - 舒适的键盘，出色的触觉触控板
与外壳一样，今年的机型在输入设备方面也没有做任何改动，因此我们可以长话短说。尽管黑色键盘的键程相对较低，但打字时感觉非常舒适。即便如此，市场上还是有更好的键盘，例如优秀的商务笔记本电脑或竞争对手的设备，如 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14.另一方面，MacBook 的键盘背光可调节程度之高，Windows 系统的竞争对手都望尘莫及。
得益于出色的软件集成，触觉触控板堪称笔记本电脑领域的最佳解决方案之一。虽然这一点没有改变，但竞争对手已经迎头赶上，推出了边缘手势（例如：华为 Matebook X Pro）。 华为 Matebook X ProApple 至今仍未在 MacBook 上安装触摸屏。
显示屏 - 小型 LED 显示屏，现在可选择哑光表面
总体而言，Apple ，新款 2024 MacBook Pro 14 选择了与之前相同的迷你 LED 显示屏。屏幕对角线为 14.2 英寸，像素为 3,072 x 1,964。其基本长宽比为 16:10，额外的 44 个垂直像素用于摄像头凹槽旁边的区域。在功能上，凹槽不会妨碍显示效果，在全面屏模式下，凹槽旁边的区域会被简单隐藏，从而显示标准的 16:10 图像。必要时，屏幕会将频率提高到最高 120 Hz。
不过，与前代产品相比，该机型有两项新功能具有明显优势。首先，现在的显示屏还采用了纳米纹理玻璃，即磨砂表面。我们已经从 iMac 及其 Studio 显示屏上熟悉了这一点，但在 MacBook Pro 上，纳米纹理滤镜直接集成到偏振滤镜中。我们的测试设备采用了哑光面板（附加费为 150 美元），恼人的反光现在已成为过去。从主观上看，与普通面板直接比较，画质只受到很小的影响，因为色彩不再那么鲜艳。不过，即使在显示明亮的内容时，我们也注意到画面没有颗粒感。
第二个变化涉及显示屏的亮度。原则上，其最大 SDR 亮度仍略高于 600 cd/m²。但是，当亮度传感器启动时，其 SDR 亮度在明亮环境下可达到 1,000 cd/m² 以上（我们测量到的最高亮度为 1,070 cd/m²）。这意味着你不再需要使用额外的应用程序。它的黑阶为 0，因此对比度极高，而且没有光晕。不过，也会出现一些明显的重影，例如，当浅色鼠标指针在深色背景上移动时。亮度和色温都可以根据环境光线自动调节。
在 HDR 模式下，该面板的最高亮度可达 1,706 cd/m²，而在显示几乎全白的画面时，亮度仍高达 1,236 cd/m²。说到这里，我们必须再次称赞Apple 的 HDR 实现。只要应用程序提供 HDR 信号，macOS 就会识别，然后在该区域提供更高的亮度--无论是全屏还是图像部分。色彩管理也会保持激活状态。在这方面，Windows 现在确实应该效仿。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 638 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro MiniLED, 3024x1964, 14.2", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 CSOT T3 MNE507HZ2-1, Mini-LED, 3072x1920, 14.5", 165 Hz | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED SDC41A2, OLED, 3200x2000, 14.5", 120 Hz | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 TL140ADXP04-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 240 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 LQ144P1JX01, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 0% | -1% | -2% | 0% | -19% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.6 | 99.2 0% | 92 -8% | 98.5 -1% | 96.9 -3% | 99.6 0% | 66.7 -33% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.7 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | 99 -1% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 89 | 96.9 9% | 87.2 -2% | 85 -4% | 89.9 1% | 68.9 -23% | |
| Response Times | -5% | 36% | 34% | 90% | 35% | 23% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 77.2 ? | 80.8 ? -5% | 12.7 ? 84% | 0.7 ? 99% | 6 ? 92% | 0.62 ? 99% | 77.6 ? -1% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 71.6 ? | 78.8 ? -10% | 11.4 ? 84% | 0.77 ? 99% | 8.3 ? 88% | 0.68 ? 99% | 34.3 ? 52% |
| PWM Frequency | 14880 ? | 14878 ? 0% | 6000 ? -60% | 480 -97% | 960 ? -94% | 17600 ? 18% | |
| Screen | -69% | -215% | -102% | -109% | -18% | -1% | |
| Brightness middle | 638 | 610 -4% | 670 5% | 351 -45% | 484.1 -24% | 423 -34% | 511 -20% |
| Brightness | 621 | 600 -3% | 680 10% | 353 -43% | 466 -25% | 424 -32% | 503 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 96 1% | 89 -6% | 97 2% | 89 -6% | 98 3% | 89 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 0.26 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.6 | 1.7 -183% | 4 -567% | 1.7 -183% | 2.23 -272% | 0.7 -17% | 0.5 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.4 | 2.3 -64% | 4.5 -221% | 2.2 -57% | 4.57 -226% | 1.8 -29% | 1.1 21% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 2.1 -163% | 4.9 -513% | 3.1 -288% | 1.6 -100% | 0.8 -0% | 0.8 -0% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.12 104% | 2.24 98% | 2.18 101% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6430 101% | 6874 95% | 5735 113% | 6616 98% | 6816 95% | 6505 100% | 6650 98% |
| Contrast | 3526 | 1274 | 42300 | 1965 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.74 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-43% | -60% /
-99% | -23% /
-43% | -7% /
-44% | 6% /
-0% | 1% /
0% |
* ... smaller is better
MacBook Pro 14 开箱即进行了出色的校准。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）对其进行了分析，其灰度和色彩结果令人惊叹。面板完全覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间和 P3 空间。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 44.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 77.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 36.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 40.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 14880 Hz Amplitude: 90 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 14880 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 14880 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8750 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
我们注意到 MacBook Pro 的迷你 LED 面板上有 14.88 kHz 的持续闪烁。对于绝大多数用户来说，这种高频率应该不是问题，但它确实使我们难以确定屏幕的响应时间。
全新 MacBook Pro 14 采用磨砂显示屏表面和改进的 SDR 亮度，非常适合户外使用。即使在明亮的阳光下，只要避免阳光的直接反射，所有内容依然清晰可辨。与旧款相比，这是一个巨大的优势，可能会成为一些用户换机的理由。此外，其视角稳定性也没有任何问题。
性能 - M4 Pro 最高配备 48GB 内存
2024 MacBook Pro 14 共有五种不同的处理器可供选择：每种处理器都会影响内存容量。搭载 M4 Pro 的机型可配备 24 或 48 GB 内存；如果要配备 36、64 或 128 GB 内存，则必须使用 M4 Max SoC。在这方面，MacBook Pro 也有别于新款 Mac Mini，后者的 M4 Pro 最多可配备 64 GB 内存。
测试条件
Apple 提供三种不同的能量曲线：我们无法检测到后两者之间的性能差异。只有风扇在负载情况下声音明显变大（最大 44.5 分贝对 56 分贝）。因此，我们使用预设的自动模式进行了以下基准测试和测量。低充电模式明显限制了 SoC 的性能（最大约 9.5 瓦），但风扇在任何时候都非常安静，甚至听不到声音（约 2,400 rpm 时最大 25.1 dB(A)）。
处理器 - M4 Pro，16 个 CPU 内核
新的Apple M4 Pro 有两种配置级别，即 12 或 14 个 CPU 内核。每种情况下，都有 4 个效率核心和 8 或 10 个性能核心。因此，安装在我们测试设备上的更强大的 M4 Pro 与更小的 M4 Max 不相上下。总体而言，与老一代 M3 相比，核心配置发生了很大变化。这同样适用于功耗，因为 M3 Pro 的最大功耗为 28 瓦，非常节俭，而 M4 Pro 的完整配置现在达到了 46 瓦，更接近老款 M3 Max（最大功耗 56 瓦）。虽然 46 瓦的功耗无法长期保持，但其约 40 瓦的永久功耗仍明显高于以前。
反过来，新处理器的性能也令人印象深刻。在单核测试中（功耗约为 6-6.5 瓦），它比老一代 M3 性能高出 20% 以上。它比最快的 Snapdragon X Elite（X1E-81-100）高出 39%。英特尔和 AMD 则落后更多，只有各自的 HX 处理器速度更快（但也需要更多电力）。
然而，M4 Pro 的多核性能却令人惊叹，因为它在 Cinebench 2024 和 Geekbench 中的表现都超过了老款 M3 Max（6-8%）。在电池模式下，其性能也保持不变。我们将在Apple M4 Pro 的分析文章中详细介绍它的效率。 分析文章中详细介绍新款 M4 Pro 的效率。
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) () | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (398 - 1662, n=43, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) () | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (101.8 - 177, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
系统性能
搭载 M4 Pro SoC 的新款 MacBook Pro 14 再次成为一款响应速度极快的笔记本电脑，能对所有输入做出即时响应。在测试过程中，我们没有发现任何稳定性问题，在基准测试中，新款 MBP 明显处于比较领域的前列。Apple ，与旧款 M3 Pro 相比，内存带宽增加了近 2 倍。
我们将在短期内添加针对 Adobe Photoshop 和 Premiere Pro 的 Puget Bench 测试。
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 20-core GPU () | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 20-core GPU () | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 20-core GPU () | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 20-core GPU () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 20-core GPU () | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 20-core GPU () | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (255 - 1016, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 20-core GPU () | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了著名的 2 TB AP2048Z 固态硬盘，用户首次启动设备后仍可使用 1.96 TB。PCIe 4.0 硬盘的性能非常出色。此外，MacBook Pro 仍然是少数几个可提供高达 8 TB SSD 存储空间的设备之一。不过，缺乏升级选项和高昂的附加费用显然是它的缺点。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
图形卡
新款 M4 Pro 的两个型号配备了不同的图形卡。性能较弱的型号配备了 16 个 GPU 核心，而我们测试设备中速度较快的型号则配备了 20 个 GPU 核心。与旧款 M3 Pro（分别为 14 和 18 个 GPU 核心）相比，每个核心增加了 2 个。M3 Pro 的 18 核 GPU 最大功耗为 28 瓦，而 M4 Pro 则高达 32 瓦。我们无法读出其 GPU 时钟。
它的性能再次表现出色，因为我们注意到，与配备更快 18 核 GPU 的旧款 M3 Pro 相比，它的性能提高了 30% 以上。在 WildLife Extreme Unlimited 测试中，新款 M4 Pro GPU 甚至与华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 中的GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑不相上下。
在进行图像/视频编辑或大型渲染时，大容量共享内存也是 M4 GPU 的一大优势。无论是在电池模式下还是在持续负载情况下，其 GPU 性能都能保持稳定。更多基准测试和效率比较，请参阅我们即将发布的分析文章。
| GFXBench | |
| 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average Apple M4 20-core GPU () | |
| Average of class Multimedia (36.4 - 204, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Average Apple M4 20-core GPU () | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average of class Multimedia (73.3 - 446, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average Apple M4 20-core GPU () | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Average of class Multimedia (178.3 - 950, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 7809 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 7818 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
除了模拟游戏外，越来越多适用于Apple M 处理器的原生游戏也开始上市。其中包括《博德之门 3》、《生化危机村》和《无人天空》。所有这些游戏都能顺利运行，《博德之门 3》即使在 1080p 的最大细节下也能以约 60fps 的速度流畅运行，这使得 MacBook 可以与 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑等专用 GPU 相媲美。虽然原生版本将于明年推出，但它在玩《赛博朋克》等模拟游戏时的表现也不差。即使在长时间的游戏过程中，该设备的游戏性能也能保持完全稳定。
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8.26 - 80.7, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms - 1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average of class Multimedia (24 - 84, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 85 | 53 | |||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 157 | 108 | 100 | 86 | 57 |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 186 | 108.4 | 76 | 55 | 35.6 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 89 | 77 | 63 | 61 | 42 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 50.1 | 48 | 44.6 | 39.6 | 24.9 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 64.4 | 55.2 | 51.2 | 50.6 | 49.5 |
排放量
噪音排放
与往常一样，在大多数日常工作中，两个风扇要么完全关闭，要么以每分钟约 2,500 转的低速运转，几乎听不到 25 分贝（A）的噪音。当用力推动部件时，风扇会提高转速，并很快达到最大值 44.5 dB(A)。这种声音清晰可闻，尤其是在安静的游戏过程中，可能会有点恼人。不过，总的来说，我们没有发现干扰频率或其他电子噪音。在 "高性能"模式下，风扇的噪音非常大（56 dB(A)）；相反，在 "低电量"模式下几乎听不到风扇的声音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 30.2 / 44.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A) | ||
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 20-core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | 0% | -15% | -9% | -7% | -10% | -15% | |
| off / environment * | 23.9 | 24.1 -1% | 24.8 -4% | 24.8 -4% | 24.3 -2% | 24.3 -2% | 23.9 -0% | 23.9 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.9 | 24.1 -1% | 24.8 -4% | 24.8 -4% | 24.3 -2% | 25 -5% | 23.9 -0% | 23.9 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 23.9 | 24.1 -1% | 24.8 -4% | 24.8 -4% | 26.5 -11% | 25 -5% | 23.9 -0% | 24.4 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.9 | 24.1 -1% | 24.8 -4% | 24.8 -4% | 28.5 -19% | 25 -5% | 23.9 -0% | 26.9 -13% |
| Load Average * | 30.2 | 25.1 17% | 25.8 15% | 47.4 -57% | 37 -23% | 33 -9% | 46.2 -53% | 48.5 -61% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44.5 | |||||||
| Load Maximum * | 44.5 | 49.4 -11% | 43.4 2% | 52.9 -19% | 43.3 3% | 51.9 -17% | 46.2 -4% | 51.8 -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 25.1 | 43.4 | 52.9 | 39.1 | 49.5 | 46.2 | 51.8 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在空闲模式和执行简单任务时，金属机箱保持超低温，但在高负载或游戏时，我们测得的温度比前代机型更高。在键盘中上部区域，我们测得的温度高达 47 °C，直接接触时会让人感到恼火。键帽的温度稍低，但在打字时确实能明显感觉到高温。在这种情况下，更快的风扇会让设备受益匪浅。不过，在底部，最高温度 44 °C，没有任何问题。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.3 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.9 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.1 °C / 91.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.3 °C / -7.8 F).
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 20-core GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | -18% | -8% | -27% | -14% | -6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47.3 | 45.9 3% | 41 13% | 40.5 14% | 41.8 12% | 46.6 1% | 40.4 15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 44.2 | 42.1 5% | 56.7 -28% | 42.6 4% | 42.2 5% | 47.8 -8% | 42.2 5% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 22.1 | 23.4 -6% | 27.4 -24% | 26.9 -22% | 34.8 -57% | 26.7 -21% | 26.6 -20% |
| Idle Bottom * | 22.1 | 23.8 -8% | 29.1 -32% | 27.8 -26% | 37.4 -69% | 27.8 -26% | 27 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试过程中，M4 Pro SoC 的耗电量曾一度高达 68 瓦，随后稳定在 40 瓦左右。CPU/GPU 之间的分配相当均匀。总体而言，M4 Pro 的表现与旧款 M3 Pro 相似，后者的最高功耗为 55 瓦。但对于较大的 MacBook Pro 16 而言，这一数值可以永久保持。
发言人
目前的 MacBook Pro 14 配备了由 6 个扬声器组成的出色音响系统，这一点没有改变。虽然竞争对手可能已经迎头赶上，但我们没有理由抱怨它的性能。内置麦克风还能实现非常清晰的语音录制。
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 电池寿命不变
耗电量
Apple 在最大 SDR 亮度约为 600 cd/m² 时，我们测得的峰值功耗为 11 瓦。不过，当显示 HDR 内容或在亮度传感器激活的明亮环境中时，这一数值会明显升高。在负载情况下，新款 MBP 14 的耗电量为 75-90 瓦。在压力测试中，它曾短暂达到 98 瓦，但随后又迅速下降。因此，所提供的 96 瓦电源装置在体积上是足够的，但它的剩余电量不多，无法在满负荷情况下为电池快速充电。
| Off / Standby | 0.16 / 0.34 Watt |
| Idle | 2.17 / 10.9 / 11 Watt |
| Load |
74.3 / 98.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro (14 cores), M4 20-core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, MiniLED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3200x2000, 14.5" | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4" | Average Apple M4 20-core GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 3% | -15% | -124% | -54% | -264% | -49% | -0% | -27% | -52% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.17 | 2.3 -6% | 2.6 -20% | 10.9 -402% | 8.1 -273% | 20.9 -863% | 6.9 -218% | 3 -38% | 3.39 ? -56% | 6.85 ? -216% |
| Idle Average * | 10.9 | 13.1 -20% | 11.8 -8% | 17.7 -62% | 9.9 9% | 25.6 -135% | 8.6 21% | 7.1 35% | 13.9 ? -28% | 11.4 ? -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11 | 13.3 -21% | 12.2 -11% | 19.3 -75% | 10.4 5% | 32.1 -192% | 9 18% | 7.6 31% | 14.1 ? -28% | 13.5 ? -23% |
| Load Average * | 74.3 | 47.4 36% | 99.9 -34% | 93.3 -26% | 75.6 -2% | 72.7 2% | 75.2 -1% | 73.1 2% | 75.4 ? -1% | 72 ? 3% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 80.5 | |||||||||
| Load Maximum * | 98.1 | 73.6 25% | 101.7 -4% | 150.2 -53% | 107.1 -9% | 228.4 -133% | 161.6 -65% | 128.5 -31% | 118.1 ? -20% | 118.6 ? -21% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.8 | 92.5 | 129.5 | 65.6 | 182.1 | 109.7 | 113.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
它的电池容量仍然是 72.6 Wh，在我们的 WLAN 测试中，该笔记本电脑的运行时间也与上一代产品相当，但根据芯片的不同会略有差异。在亮度为 150 cd/m²（比最大 SDR 亮度低 8 级）的情况下，我们测得的运行时间略低于 16 小时，远远领先于对比组中的 Windows 竞争产品。在 SDR 全亮度条件下，WLAN 测试仍能运行约 6.5 小时。我们将在接下来的几天里进一步补充电池运行时间。
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro (14 cores), M4 20-core GPU, 72.6 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, 72.6 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, 72.6 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 69.5 Wh | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 58 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 947 | 911 -4% | 979 3% | 477 -50% | 465 -51% | 428 -55% | 555 -41% | 498 -47% | 627 ? -34% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
Apple 新推出的 M4 Pro 处理器将 MacBook Pro 14 的性能提升到了一个新的水平，进一步扩大了对英特尔、AMD 和高通公司的领先优势。它的运行时间仍然很出色，新的磨砂面板选项非常令人兴奋，尤其是当你经常在户外或非常明亮的环境中使用设备时。其他升级还包括 Thunderbolt 5 和功能更强大的 1200 万像素摄像头。不过，你将不得不放弃 Wi-Fi 7。总而言之，新款 MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro 是一款非常出色、功能强大的笔记本电脑，但与往常一样，这也是有代价的。
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro
- 11/07/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
