华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和 G-Sync OLED 的游戏/多媒体笔记本电脑
在以前,ROG Zephyrus G14 是一款性能极为强劲的 14 英寸笔记本电脑,搭载 AMD 处理器,顶多是 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑。然而,它的底座却因此而变得非常厚,与迷你 LED 面板相结合的运行时间也只能算一般。正如我们已经看到的新款 ROG Zephyrus G16 (在此评论),华硕 Zephyrus G14 的 2024 型号采取了略有不同的路线,旨在吸引新型客户。其 GPU 性能尤其有所降低,因为现在您可以获得 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑笔记本电脑。相比之下,它的机身更加紧凑,完全由铝合金制成(一体式机身设计)。此外,它的迷你 LED 面板也换成了支持 G-Sync 的 OLED 面板。总的来说,新款 G14 似乎更倾向于多媒体用途,其最大的竞争对手是 雷蛇刀锋 14和 Apple MacBook Pro 14.
我们的测试配置使用了AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS 、32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD、120 Hz OLED 屏幕以及GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑- 所有这些的 MRSP 为 2199.99 美元。如果您需要 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑提供的额外性能,2023 版 ROG Zephyrus G14 仍可购买。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
93 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 20.79 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1600 | |
88.7 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
90 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 20.5 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
93.2 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
89.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 带有 LED 灯带的轻质铝合金一体成型外壳
新款 ROG Zephyrus G14 的设计与更大的 G16 型号相同,其一体成型的铝制外壳明显让人联想到Apple MacBook Pro 14 或 Razer Blade 14 等设备。在操作这款笔记本电脑时,毫无疑问它是一款真正的高端设备。我们的测试设备是深灰色款(日蚀灰),你也可以选择白色款(铂金白)。白色机型不那么容易留下指纹,而灰色机型则更不容易留下指纹。
华硕在这款新机的盖子上取消了大量的点阵显示屏,转而采用了由 28 个微型 LED 和 7 个不同区域组成的薄型白色对角照明条(Slash Lighting)。它可以进行编程(例如作为通知灯),如果不想引起人们对设备的注意,也可以完全关闭。除了背光键盘外,这款笔记本电脑没有任何其他照明元素。
底座的构造和稳定性令人印象深刻,即使使用很大的压力,我们也无法按压键盘区域。Zephyrus 也不会发出吱吱嘎嘎的声音。薄薄的显示屏盖子比较灵活,但我们也没有发现任何问题。单手就能轻松打开盖子,而且与较大的 G16 相比,它在调整角度时不会晃动得那么厉害。背面的新铰链设计将设备的最大开启角度限制在 135 度,以避免后部的散热器开口将热空气引向显示屏底部边缘。
我们测试的新款 Zephyrus G14 配置仅重 1.478 千克,是同类产品中最轻的设备,而且与 MacBook Pro 14也是最紧凑的机型之一。在这一点上,你可以发现它与更厚的 2023 G14 有很大不同,而且新机型更容易携带外出。180 瓦的电源使机身重量增加了 559 克。
连接性 - AMD Zephyrus 配备 USB 4.0
尽管外壳较小,但 G14 的连接选项与较大的 G16 几乎完全相同。 较大的 G16-只是其 SD 读卡器现在可以读取较小的 microSD 卡。当然,它不支持 Thunderbolt,但反过来,这款笔记本电脑配备了完整的 USB-4.0 端口,由于 USB-C 和 USB-A 端口的良好组合,日常使用中可能不需要使用适配器。两侧的端口分布也很合理,游戏玩家会很高兴看到左侧和右侧都可以连接鼠标。除了 180 瓦的电源,G14 还可以通过 USB-C 接口充电(最大 100 瓦,在我们的测试中,65 瓦的电源也能正常工作)。它的 USB-4.0 端口通过 iGPU 连接,这意味着您可以为外置显示器供电,而无需激活 Nvidia GPU。
SD 读卡器
右侧的 microSD 读卡器可完全读取存储卡,并配有弹簧装置。令人惊讶的是,它的性能比较大的 G16 更好,与我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)一起使用时,我们测得的传输速率超过 190 MB/s,在将图像文件复制到笔记本电脑上时,我们仍然测得约 150 MB/s 的高速。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY (Angelibrid AV Pro V60) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY (Angelibrid AV Pro V60) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
交流
该设备的联发科无线局域网模块(MT9722)支持包括 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3 在内的所有重要标准。在使用华硕参考路由器进行的测试中,我们测得了极高且稳定的传输速率,甚至比更大的 G16 还要好一些。不过,你可能不会注意到这些差异,而且在测试过程中,我们使用多个路由器进行无线连接时从未遇到过任何问题。G14 还不支持 Wi-Fi 7 或以太网连接(如果需要,您必须使用 USB 适配器)。
Networking | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
位于显示屏上部边框的 1080p 网络摄像头可在光线充足的条件下拍摄出漂亮的照片,还支持面部跟踪或柔焦等功能。此外,它还配有一个红外摄像头,可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。
维护
除了可见的螺钉外,还有两颗螺钉位于胶粘的橡胶盖下面,这使得访问组件变得不必要的困难。不过,由于内存是焊接在一起的,因此无论如何都无法深入内部。M.2-2280 固态硬盘可以更换,无线局域网模块和电池也可以更换。此外,你还可以对风扇进行清洁。
输入设备 - 舒适的键盘和大尺寸触摸板
G14 配有背光键盘(一个 RGB 区域,3 个强度级别),尽管外壳是扁平的,但仍具有 1.7 毫米的键程。这也是与 ZenBook Pro 14.键盘输入感觉非常舒适,触感悦耳,这意味着你可以轻松地在设备上输入较长的文本。不过,键盘的布局并没有什么特别之处,只是你必须习惯它的单行回车键和小方向键--这在游戏笔记本电脑上并不理想。
新的触摸板非常大,尺寸为 12.7 x 8 厘米(16:10 比例),华硕完全利用了键盘下方的空间。触摸板表面光滑,操作起来非常顺手,咔哒咔哒的噪音也很低,给人一种高品质的感觉。
显示屏 - 120 Hz OLED,带 G-Sync 功能
华硕将前代机型的迷你 LED 屏幕换成了支持 G-Sync 的反射式 120-Hz OLED 面板(2,880 x 1,800 像素,16:10)。主观而言,三星面板的画质令人惊叹,电影和游戏看起来都非常棒。它的响应时间超快,而且由于其构造,不会出现任何光晕效果。
在 SDR 模式下,它的平均亮度为 420 cd/m²,这是一个不错的结果。与 OLED 的典型特性一样,它的黑色值为 0,因此对比度极高。华硕表示 HDR 亮度的最大值为 500 cd/m²,而我们测得的峰值为 485 cd/m²。在这方面,三星面板无法媲美 OLED 显示器,尤其是Apple MacBook Pro 14 的迷你 LED 面板(最大 1,600 cd/m²)。此外,我们不得不继续批评 Windows 的 HDR 实施,因为它必须手动激活,而且随后色彩配置文件也不再正常工作。目前,所有 Windows 设备都会受到影响。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 423 cd/m²
Contrast: 42300:1 (Black: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI SDC4190, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 Samsung SDC ATNA45AF02-2, OLED, 2880x1600, 14.5" | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B140QAN06.U, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY B140QAN06.S, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | 2% | -2% | 1% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.6 | 99.6 0% | 99.9 0% | 97.3 -2% | 99.6 0% | 99.2 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 89.9 | 97.5 8% | 96.5 7% | 85.3 -5% | 93.4 4% | |
Response Times | -38% | -50% | -1448% | -1188% | -7657% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.62 ? | 0.67 ? -8% | 0.79 ? -27% | 11.9 ? -1819% | 17.2 ? -2674% | 80.8 ? -12932% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.68 ? | 0.9 ? -32% | 1.01 ? -49% | 8 ? -1076% | 9.9 ? -1356% | 78.8 ? -11488% |
PWM Frequency | 960 ? | 240 -75% | 240.5 ? -75% | 5430 466% | 14878 ? 1450% | |
Screen | -8% | -144% | -756% | -29% | -42% | |
Brightness middle | 423 | 356 -16% | 377.5 -11% | 559.3 32% | 535 26% | 610 44% |
Brightness | 424 | 358 -16% | 381 -10% | 560 32% | 563 33% | 600 42% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 99 1% | 97 -1% | 88 -10% | 91 -7% | 96 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.01 | 0.44 -4300% | ||||
Contrast | 42300 | 1271 -97% | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.7 | 0.8 -14% | 4.19 -499% | 4.44 -534% | 1 -43% | 1.7 -143% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.8 | 1.6 11% | 7.02 -290% | 9.3 -417% | 2.8 -56% | 2.3 -28% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 0.9 -13% | 1.2 -50% | 6.8 -750% | 1.8 -125% | 2.1 -163% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.19 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.3 96% | 2.24 98% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6505 100% | 6590 99% | 6296 103% | 6242 104% | 6337 103% | 6874 95% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.81 | 0.39 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-13% | -64% /
-84% | -735% /
-688% | -405% /
-311% | -2566% /
-2322% |
* ... smaller is better
Armoury-Crate 软件提供了不同的色彩配置文件供您选择,我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2)对其进行了分析。预选的Native配置文件非常适合日常使用,但色彩有点过于饱和。为了确保最佳色彩准确度,您应该选择显示 P3 配置文件。使用该配置文件,灰阶和色彩已接近完美,您无需再自行校准显示器。我们在测试设备上校准了显示屏,但无法进一步改善显示效果,因此我们没有提供相应的配置文件供下载。
OLED 面板完全覆盖了 P3 色彩空间和较小的 sRGB 空间,此外,如果你喜欢编辑照片,那么 sRGB 配置文件会让你特别高兴。在这里,色彩空间仅限于较小的标准,你可以轻松地处理准确的色彩。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.68 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.36 ms rise | |
↘ 0.32 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.33 ms rise | |
↘ 0.29 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 960 Hz | ≤ 60 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 60 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
一般来说,新型 OLED 面板使用频率为 960 Hz 的 PWM 技术,但当亮度超过 60% 时,则使用危害较小的直流调光技术(频率为 240 Hz)。一旦亮度低于这个水平,就会弹出警告,说明直流调光不再可用。与华硕其他 OLED 笔记本电脑的情况一样,你可以通过软件调暗显示屏,从而继续使用直流调光。我们只是希望这种控制能与常规的亮度控制相结合,以最大限度地提高舒适度。顺便提一下,在显示屏亮度达到最大时,我们没有测到任何 PWM。
Zephyrus G14 的户外表现非常出色,即使在阳光明媚的日子里,只要避免阳光直射,也能很好地使用它。它的视角稳定性很好,只有在偏离中心较大的情况下才会出现轻微的蓝色光泽,但这是 OLED 面板的典型现象。
性能 - Ryzen 8000 和 Ada Lovelace
2024 ROG Zephyrus G14 只能配备 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS和 16 或 32 GB 内存。由于现在的内存都是焊接上去的,我们希望所有机型都能配备至少 32 GB 的内存。 2023 G14在这一点上,老款 2023 G14 有点优势。说到显卡,您可以选择GeForce RTX 4050/4060/4070 笔记本电脑。
测试条件
在 Armoury-Crate 软件中,华硕提供了各种能耗配置文件以及手动模式,让您可以单独设置 GPU/CPU 性能。我们将这些能耗曲线的值汇总到下表中。
能源概况 | CPU 负载 | CB R23 Multi | GPU 负载 | Time Spy 图形 | 赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra | 最大风扇噪音排放 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
静音 | 55->35 瓦 | 16,580 点 | 60 瓦 | 6,070 点 | 39.9 fps | 42.9 dB(A) |
性能 | 65->45 瓦 | 17,079 分 | 75 瓦 | 10,392 分 | 43.6 帧/秒 | 46.2 分贝(A) |
涡轮 | 80->80 瓦 | 17,467 分 | 90 瓦 | 11,348 分 | 47.7 fps | 52.8 dB(A) |
经过多次测试,我们决定使用性能模式进行以下基准测试和测量。虽然您可能无法获得最高性能,但在玩游戏时风扇仍然是可以承受的。得益于其出色的扬声器,在选择性能模式时,你甚至可以不戴耳机玩游戏。即便如此,如果你需要尽可能高的性能,只需按下按钮就能轻松切换模式(不过,涡轮增压模式只有在连接电源时才可用)。在执行简单任务时,应选择安静模式。
处理器 - Ryzen 9 8945HS
G14 配备了全新的 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS(鹰点)处理器。这是一款凤凰刷新(Phoenix-Refresh)型号的处理器,遗憾的是,它的性能仅略有提升,仍然依靠 Zen4 内核与集成的 Radeon 780M 组合。不过,由于时钟频率也保持不变,其总性能与旧版的 Ryzen 9 7940HS在涡轮增压模式下,其性能提升幅度太小,不足以证明风扇噪音过大是合理的。有关与英特尔新款 Meteor-Lake 处理器的性能和效率对比,请参阅我们即将发布的有关新款 Ryzen-8000 处理器的分析文章。在电池使用情况下,其多核性能略低(-10%),因为其功耗更快地降至 45 瓦。更多 CPU 基准测试 这里。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (16463 - 17376, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (1719 - 1825, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (6404 - 6785, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (676 - 711, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (2620 - 2775, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (265 - 287, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (186 - 198, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (68889 - 72821, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (5994 - 6668, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (12015 - 13715, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (2399 - 2707, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (10985 - 12481, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (1835 - 2039, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (19.8 - 22.2, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (48.4 - 54.9, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (0.4294 - 0.4452, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (26817 - 28836, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (113231 - 122633, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (4839 - 5077, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (119279 - 125044, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (15026 - 15661, n=4) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (60420 - 65746, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (86495 - 169431, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (1029 - 1135, n=4) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (14216 - 15588, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (33371 - 40815, n=4) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 |
系统性能
在合成基准测试中,新款 Zephyrus G14 可能会落后于对比设备,但在日常使用中,你不会注意到设备之间的差异,而且 G14 是一款反应非常迅速的设备。在测试过程中,我们也从未遇到过任何系统问题。由于采用了 Advanced-Optimus 功能,在切换到 dGPU 时(例如启动游戏时)会出现轻微卡顿,但这完全正常。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7436 - 8312, n=3) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9672 - 11290, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9502 - 10332, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (11907 - 13363, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1767 - 1830, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1686 - 1783, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1935 - 1960, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1489 - 1672, n=2) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (268 - 324, n=3) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 328, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (226 - 269, n=3) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (488 - 586, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7436 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (62371 - 68976, n=4) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (49966 - 61710, n=4) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (78351 - 93153, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (91.2 - 110.4, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时没有显示出任何限制。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Zephyrus G14 有一个 M.2-2280 SSD 插槽,通过 PCIe 4.0 连接。华硕将 1 TB 版本的西部数据 SN560 安装到我们的设备中,首次启动笔记本电脑后,用户有 853 GB 的可用空间。该固态硬盘并非速度最快的型号之一,但其总体性能仍然不错,即使在长期负载的情况下也能保持完全稳定。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在执行简单任务时,新款 Zephyrus G14 2024 经常使用 Radeon 780M而在游戏时(或执行 GPU 密集型任务时),系统会自动切换到专用的 Nvidia GPU,华硕据此提供了 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑, 4060 笔记本电脑或 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑(例如我们的测试样品)。不过,您无法充分发挥 4070 笔记本电脑的性能,因为其 TGP 在性能模式下为 75 瓦,在涡轮增压模式下为 90 瓦。G14 配备了包括高级优化在内的 MUX 开关,这意味着当笔记本电脑停用 iGPU 时无需重启系统。
考虑到功率限制,这款笔记本电脑的基准测试结果尚可,使用涡轮增压模式可以获得更高的性能(这也将缩小与 ZenBook Pro 14 等对比设备的差距)。 ZenBook Pro 14).它的图形性能在长期负载下保持完全稳定,但在电池模式下最大功耗被限制在 42 瓦(-25%)。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里.
3DMark 11 Performance | 31277 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24306 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10485 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
尽管新款 Zephyrus G14 可能不再是硬核游戏玩家的首选,但目前的游戏在这款小巧的 14 英寸设备上运行起来毫不费力。它的 AMD 处理器也给我们留下了良好的印象,与目前的 Meteor Lake 相比,它似乎具有一些优势 酷睿至尊 7 155H不过,我们还将进行更深入的测试,CPU 和 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的功耗限制将完全相同。这些结果将在我们的 Ryzen-8000 分析文章中公布。结合其出色的 120-Hz OLED 面板(G-Sync),这款笔记本电脑可提供非凡的游戏体验。在玩要求非常苛刻的游戏时,您可能需要使用 Nvidia DLSS 等升级技术,如果游戏支持光线追踪技术,也可以使用。此外,即使在长时间的游戏过程中,它的游戏性能也能保持完全稳定。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=56) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
2560x1440 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (42.4 - 169.4, n=37, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (47 - 93.1, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30.7 - 90.7, n=34) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 110, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24.8 - 57.1, n=32) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 | |
1920x1080 Extreme Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (27 - 205, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (92 - 120, n=7) | |
2560x1440 Extreme Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (48 - 162, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (64 - 83, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 103, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (49 - 62, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (18 - 70, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 42, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
我们还注意到不同的能量模式对几款 QHD 分辨率和最高细节的游戏的影响。正如您所看到的,虽然存在一些差异,但这些差异并不大。即使在静音模式下,你通常仍能很好地运行这些游戏(尤其是在稍微降低分辨率或使用 DLSS 的情况下)--在实际操作中,你应该多尝试不同的设置。
能量曲线 | 《孤岛惊魂 5》 | Witcher 3 | 《赛博朋克 2077》 | 《现代战争 3》 | 《阿凡达》 | 《星球大战绝地求生 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
安静 | 78 fps | 73.9 fps | 39.9 fps | 50 fps | 30 fps | 36.6 fps |
性能 | 95 fps | 81.6 fps | 43.6 fps | 72 fps | 33 fps | 39.8 fps |
Turbo | 99 fps | 87.3 fps | 47.7 fps | 77 fps | 37 fps | 44.6 fps |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 158.3 | 95.7 | 80.2 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 203 | 97.1 | 81.6 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 149.6 | 140.6 | 126.3 | 120.7 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 132.3 | 103.1 | 75.5 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 121.8 | 103.8 | 82 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 132 | 115 | 110 | 103 | 95 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 370 | 261 | 213 | 187.1 | 126.7 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 299 | 262 | 220 | 129 | 96.6 |
F1 22 (2022) | 194.5 | 200 | 166.3 | 67 | 44.3 |
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) | 80.1 | 70.5 | 67 | 63.5 | 39.8 |
F1 23 (2023) | 194.5 | 205 | 153.4 | 49.5 | 36 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 119.4 | 99.4 | 84.4 | 73.9 | 43.6 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 167 | 150 | 113 | 104 | 72 |
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 81 | 74 | 65 | 49 | 33 |
排放 - 令人惊叹的扬声器
噪音排放
与我们的测试样本 Zephyrus G16新款 G14 也使用了三个风扇,华硕决定完全不使用 Vapor-Chamber 解决方案。总的来说,G14 比较大的 G16 更安静、更舒适,尤其是在低负载情况下--你将更经常地享受到完全静音的设备。在负载情况下,我们测得的噪音值为 46 dB(A),虽然清晰可闻,但由于笔记本电脑配备了出色的扬声器,因此不戴耳机也能正常使用。另一方面,在涡轮增压模式下,噪音会变得非常大。我们在测试设备上没有发现任何其他电子噪音。
能耗曲线 | 3DMark 06 | Witcher 3 | 赛博朋克 2077 自由魅影 | 压力测试 |
---|---|---|---|---|
静音 | 42.9 dB(A) | 37.5 dB(A) | 42.9 dB(A) | 42.9 dB(A) |
性能 | 46.2 dB(A) | 46.2 dB(A) | 46.2 dB(A) | 46.2 dB(A) |
涡轮 | 46.2 dB(A) | 52.8 dB(A) | 52.8 dB(A) | 52.8 dB(A) |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 46.2 / 46.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A) |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | 1% | -9% | 12% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 23.9 | 22.8 5% | 22.7 5% | 23.3 3% | 24.1 -1% | 23.3 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.9 | 22.8 5% | 23.4 2% | 23.6 1% | 24.1 -1% | 23.3 3% |
Idle Average * | 23.9 | 27.3 -14% | 23.4 2% | 23.6 1% | 24.1 -1% | 23.3 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.9 | 30.7 -28% | 23.4 2% | 33 -38% | 24.1 -1% | 23.3 3% |
Load Average * | 46.2 | 41.6 10% | 33 29% | 49.5 -7% | 25.1 46% | 39.3 15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.2 | 52.8 -14% | 51.8 -12% | 52.2 -13% | 25.1 46% | 48.8 -6% |
Load Maximum * | 46.2 | 52.6 -14% | 55.6 -20% | 52.2 -13% | 49.4 -7% | 48.8 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在空闲模式和低负载情况下,铝制外壳几乎不发热,保持良好的冷却状态。在玩游戏或高负载情况下,键盘上方区域的温度尤其高(超过 45 °C),但键盘本身的温度却很低,丝毫不影响操作。在底部,我们测得的温度有时超过 45 °C,在高负载情况下,不应将设备放在大腿上。在压力测试中,CPU 的平衡功耗为 24 瓦,GPU 为 65 瓦。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.3 °C / 90.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.4 °C / -6.1 F).
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU | Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | -2% | 1% | 16% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 46.6 | 40.4 13% | 37.4 20% | 47 -1% | 42 10% | 40.6 13% |
Maximum Bottom * | 47.8 | 49.4 -3% | 35.2 26% | 46.5 3% | 38.3 20% | 49.5 -4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.7 | 28.2 -6% | 33.2 -24% | 25.9 3% | 23 14% | 28.2 -6% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.8 | 29.8 -7% | 36.2 -30% | 28 -1% | 22.8 18% | 30.6 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
与较大的 G16 一样,新款 G14 也配备了一个由 6 个模块组成的扬声器系统,因此高音听起来并不那么突出(4 个 2 瓦低音扬声器、2 个 2 瓦高音扬声器)。其结果令人印象深刻,因为它的声音强劲有力,非常响亮。 MacBook Pro 14望尘莫及。通常情况下,你不需要外接扬声器。
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 改进运行时间
耗电量
在空闲模式下,我们的测试设备显示出非常节俭的特性,最大耗电量为 9 瓦,尽管深色显示屏背景有所帮助。当显示较亮的内容时,OLED 面板可能需要更多电量。在运行游戏时,我们测得的功耗约为 110 瓦;在压力测试开始时,我们测得的最大功耗为 161 瓦,但很快就平衡了,约为 135 瓦,后来又降至 115 瓦。因此,所提供的 180 瓦电源大小足够。
Off / Standby | 0.13 / 0.29 Watt |
Idle | 6.9 / 8.6 / 9 Watt |
Load |
75.2 / 161.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, OLED, 2880x1600, 14.5" | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -25% | -110% | -44% | 20% | -23% | -84% | -102% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.9 | 7.3 -6% | 19.5 -183% | 9.4 -36% | 2.3 67% | 7.5 -9% | 12.4 ? -80% | 13.5 ? -96% |
Idle Average * | 8.6 | 9.6 -12% | 24.7 -187% | 14.2 -65% | 13.1 -52% | 11.1 -29% | 17.5 ? -103% | 18.9 ? -120% |
Idle Maximum * | 9 | 17.3 -92% | 27 -200% | 14.5 -61% | 13.3 -48% | 11.6 -29% | 24.2 ? -169% | 26.7 ? -197% |
Load Average * | 75.2 | 76.6 -2% | 83.2 -11% | 79 -5% | 47.4 37% | 91.9 -22% | 97.6 ? -30% | 106.3 ? -41% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 109.7 | 152 -39% | 165.8 -51% | 172 -57% | 42.8 61% | 132.2 -21% | ||
Load Maximum * | 161.6 | 160.9 -0% | 204.5 -27% | 220.8 -37% | 73.6 54% | 208 -29% | 222 ? -37% | 249 ? -54% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
华硕安装了一块 73 瓦时的电池,除了 MacBook Pro 14 之外,新款 Zephyrus G14 在电池续航时间方面击败了所有对比设备。在 Armoury Crate 软件中,刷新率被设置为电池模式下的 60 Hz,这就是我们使用这些值进行比较的原因。在 150 cd/m²(测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 63%)的 WLAN 测试中,G14 的运行时间达到了 9:15 小时,而在全亮度状态下,G14 的运行时间刚刚超过 7 小时。在 150 cd/m² 的视频测试中,它的实际运行时间甚至略高于 12 小时。与去年的 去年的 G14.全亮度下的 4K HDR 视频可持续约 4.5 小时。
如果在电池模式下使用 120 Hz 的刷新率,那么笔记本电脑在 150 cd/m² 下的 WLAN 运行时间将缩短约 45 分钟,在最大亮度下缩短约 40 分钟。在设备开启的情况下,完全充电需要 100 分钟;31 分钟后可充满 60%的电量,48 分钟后可充满 80%的电量。
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73.6 Wh | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, 72.6 Wh | Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 3% | -21% | -23% | 54% | -19% | -14% | |
H.264 | 725 | 431 -41% | 1213 67% | 511 -30% | 409 ? -44% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 555 | 448 -19% | 374 -33% | 448 -19% | 979 76% | 456 -18% | 375 ? -32% |
Load | 64 | 80 25% | 59 -8% | 58 -9% | 77 20% | 58 -9% | 85.6 ? 34% |
Pros
Cons
评语 - ROG Zephyrus G14 是一款令人惊叹的全面解决方案
在我们的测试中,新款华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 给人留下了非常好的印象。虽然前代机型的高性能不得不为更轻薄的机身让路,但这也让该设备对不同的受众更有吸引力--即使你没有任何游戏方面的野心,而只是在寻找一款优秀的多媒体笔记本电脑,那么新款 G14 也会让你眼前一亮。
与上一代产品相比,Ryzen 处理器的性能可能不会有任何提升,但它在 TDP 领域依然表现出色。再加上GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑和 120-Hz OLED(包括 G-Sync),在这款小巧的设备上玩游戏真是乐趣无穷。同时,它的扬声器也得到了改进,坦率地说,在 14 英寸笔记本电脑中找不到比它更好的音响系统了。纤薄的机身并没有对其出色的键盘造成任何负面影响,甚至连连接选项也毫不逊色。此外,与旧款相比,华硕还成功地明显改善了笔记本电脑的运行时间。
新款 ROG Zephyrus G14 可能是目前市场上最全面的笔记本电脑。华硕在高品质、小巧的铝合金机身内集成了大量积极的功能,并配备了出色的输入设备和令人印象深刻的扬声器。唯一明显的缺点是采用了焊接式内存。
这款笔记本电脑最大的弱点是它的焊接式内存,尤其是在只有 16GB 的配置上。其隐藏式外壳螺丝也有点令人困惑。此外,你还可以批评它的 HDR 亮度相对较低,或者它不支持 Wi-Fi 7,而很多其他新款笔记本电脑都已经支持 Wi-Fi 7。
新款 G14 的竞争对手是 ZenBook Pro 14.它们的性能和 OLED 屏幕相似,但 ZenBook Pro 14 更高质量、更小巧、更轻便。另一方面,我们并不认为新机型是去年 Zephyrus G14 的竞争对手,而更多地认为它是该系列的延伸,面向的客户可能并不需要最高性能,而是希望拥有更轻便的设备。型号 2023 G14仍然有其存在的理由,华硕似乎也是这么认为的,因为它仍然可以购买。
当然,它与 Apple MacBook Pro 14.作为一款游戏笔记本电脑,华硕 G14 的优势非常明显,因为适用于 Windows 系统的游戏实在是太多了。但在多媒体笔记本电脑方面,Zephyrus 也不输给 MacBook。除了更好的游戏性能,G14 在键盘甚至扬声器方面都有优势,而且性价比更高。反过来,如果你要处理大量 HDR 内容或需要长时间运行,MacBook 则是更好的选择。此外,它还可以(花高价)配备更快的 M3-Max 处理器、更多内存和更大的固态硬盘(最大 128 GB 内存和 8 TB)。
价格和供应情况
新款 ROG Zephyrus G14 将于 2024 年 2 月 15 日开始发售,您可以从华硕网站上进行预购.价格从 2,199.99 美元起。
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U
- 02/06/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.