华为 MateBook X Pro 2024 笔记本电脑评测--980 克重的镁合金超极本，令人印象深刻的 OLED 面板

Name: Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024
Brand: Huawei

1200 nit OLED 和 Core Ultra 9。

MateBook X Pro 是华为的旗舰笔记本电脑，新款 2024 型号的重量已减至 1 千克以下。此外，它的 IPS 屏幕换成了 OLED 触摸屏，亮度可达到 1000 尼特以上，画质令人印象深刻。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/07/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AI Intel Intel Evo Laptop / Notebook Meteor Lake Thunderbolt Ultrabook Touchscreen Windows

华为 MateBook X Pro 的 2022 和 2023 型号属于用钱能买到的最好的 14 英寸超极本。随着新款 2024 版本的发布，该制造商的目标是将标准定得更高，将更轻薄的镁合金外壳与柔性 OLED 面板（仍为 3,120 x 2,080 像素，纵横比为 3:2）相结合，从而使重量比上一代产品减少了近 300 克。这款笔记本电脑的新型 OLED 触摸屏的最大 HDR 亮度应该超过 1,000 cd/m²，并覆盖 AdobeRGB 色彩空间。我们想知道，其轻薄的结构是否真的带来了更好的整体包装，或者是否因为重量更轻而需要做出太多妥协。

我们测试的新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 是高端机型，配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H、32 GB LPDDR5x 6400 内存、2 TB 固态硬盘以及上述 OLED 触摸屏面板，当前售价约为 2,600 美元。其入门价格（酷睿至尊 7 155H、16 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘）目前略高于 2,200 美元。

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 (MateBook X Pro Series)

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 16 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Core: 2350 MHz, 31.0.101.5445

Memory

32 GB

, LPDDR5x-6400, dual-channel, onboard

Display

14.20 inch 3:2, 3120 x 2080 pixel 264 PPI, capacitive, VisN236HUZ15, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH

Storage

WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00, 2048 GB

, 1824 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 13.5 x 310 x 223

Battery

70 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 6-speaker system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 90W PSU, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

980 g, Power Supply: 236 g

Price

2500 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2024	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	980 g	13.5 mm	14.20"	3120x2080
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.2 kg	11.6 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
86.7 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.2 kg	14.9 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
90 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	987 g	16.5 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
90.8 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.1 kg	14.96 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
89.6 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.3 kg	15.6 mm	14.20"	3120x2080
88.6 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	1.2 kg	14.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1200

外壳 - 浅蓝色镁合金

与 2023 年推出的前代产品相比，新款 MateBook X Pro 采用了更纤薄、更轻巧的外壳。的前代产品相比相比，新机型的重量仅为 980 克。一拿起笔记本电脑，你就会发现它非常轻巧。即便如此，它的质量依然很好，并继续使用镁合金。磨砂表面手感舒适，不会留下太多指纹痕迹。它的每一面边框都很窄，屏占比高达 87%。

我们的高端机型采用了新的莫兰迪蓝配色，与旧机型相比，蓝色调更浅。而基本款则为黑色，你也可以选择带有黑色键盘的白色款。

它的制造质量很好，但由于重量较轻，在稳定性方面需要做出一些妥协。尤其是中间的键盘区域会有明显的凹陷，从而导致一些细微的吱吱声。此外，机箱底盖非常薄，中间缺少一个固定夹。在这个区域，有一些空气，你可以从笔记本电脑中听到一些嘎吱嘎吱的声音。尽管如此，这在日常使用中应该不会造成任何问题。

显示屏的盖子也非常薄，而且相当容易弯曲。当试图扭动它时，我们注意到一些听起来像胶水脱落的声音。不过，由于显示屏采用的是 OLED 面板，这并没有导致任何图像错误。铰链很平滑，单手就能轻松打开笔记本电脑，但在调整打开角度（最大 135 度）或进行更剧烈的运动时，屏幕会有轻微的晃动。在操作触摸屏时也会出现这种情况。

如前所述，新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 的重量仅为 980 克，非常轻巧，甚至低于 LG Gram Style 14。 LG Gram Style 14的 987 克还要低，而 LG 的机身厚度也要稍厚一些。其最大的竞争对手三星 Galaxy Book4 Pro 14重约 250 克，但其厚度更薄，结构更稳定。尽管 MateBook X Pro 采用 14.2 英寸面板，但它的体积却相当小巧。附带的 90 瓦电源包括 USB-C 线缆总重 236 克。

尺寸比较

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - 华为取消了耳机插孔

与上一代产品相比，新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 的接口更少了。侧面的两个 USB-C 接口少了一个，3.5 毫米音频接口也被完全取消。这款笔记本电脑的供货范围至少包括一个简单的 USB-C 入耳式耳机。在设备的左侧，仍然有两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口，你仍然可以选择在两侧为 MateBook X Pro 2024 充电。此外，右侧还有一个网络摄像头快门开关。此外，MateBook 还可以使用熟悉的超级设备功能与其他华为设备轻松通信，例如交换数据。

左：2x USB-C 4.0，带 Thunderbolt 4（40 Gbit/s）、DisplayPort、Power Delivery

右：网络摄像头快门、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2（10 Gbit/s、DisplayPort、Power Delivery）

交流

华为继续使用著名的英特尔 AX211 模块，支持 6 GHz（Wi-Fi 6E）和蓝牙 5.3，但尚未提供 Wi-Fi 7。在我们使用华硕参考路由器进行的标准化 WLAN 测试中，其传输速率约为 1.7 Gbit/s，在同类产品中属于最快、最稳定的。在日常使用中，我们也从未遇到过任何连接问题。

Networking
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1685 (min: 1578) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1731 (min: 1704) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1645 (min: 1487) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1556 (min: 1430) MBit/s ∼90%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1638 (min: 1574) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1654 (min: 1582) MBit/s ∼96%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	936 (min: 757) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	928 (min: 467) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1630 (min: 1558) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1665 (min: 1588) MBit/s ∼99%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1002 (min: 843) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1183 (min: 848) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1226 (min: 1162) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1444 (min: 1310) MBit/s ∼86%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	591 (min: 549) MBit/s ∼34%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	938 (min: 925) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1353 (min: 1192) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1682 (min: 868) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1737 (min: 1638) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1712 (min: 1684) MBit/s ∼99%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1685 (1578-1721)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1731 (1704-1753)

网络摄像头

总的来说，MateBook 的 1080p 网络摄像头没有任何变化，除了华为熟悉的 AI 功能外，它现在还支持 Windows 的工作室特效（柔焦、自动居中等）。华为软件还提供其他功能（虚拟背景、美颜滤镜）。网络摄像头本身的质量也不错。

ColorChecker Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024: 9.22 ∆E min: 3.41 - max: 14.68 ∆E

维护

与之前的机型一样，华为为用户拆卸机壳底盖设置了不必要的困难。背面的两个橡胶脚垫下有两个隐藏的螺丝。但是，由于橡胶脚垫粘得非常紧，几乎不可能在不造成损坏的情况下将其取下。

输入设备 - MateBook X Pro 仍配备出色的键盘

新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 的纤薄机身对其键盘没有任何影响，因为它的键程仍然是 1.5 毫米，与 2023 机型直接对比，我们注意到在键盘上打字的感觉没有任何区别。得益于其较大的键程和精准的按键，用户仍能获得笔记本电脑领域最好的键盘体验之一。从舒适度的角度来看，它可以轻松与最新的 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12.键盘布局合理，只是垂直方向键有点偏小。电源键位于键盘本身外侧的右上方，指纹传感器也位于该键内。键盘采用两级白色背光，遗憾的是仍无法自动激活。

华为也没有改变笔记本电脑的触觉触摸板。点击时的反馈是由振动电机产生的，因此无论你在哪里点击，都能获得相同的反馈，而且产生的噪音非常小，感觉质量很高。边缘上还有更多手势，名为 FreeTouch。例如，可以在右侧边缘调节音量，并支持网格效果（例如，亮度在左侧，视频时间轴在顶部）。当然，电容式触摸屏还可用于输入，操作起来也没有任何问题。

显示屏 - 柔性 OLED，亮度超过 1,200 尼特

华为在新款 2024 MateBook X Pro 上将 IPS 面板换成了 OLED 显示屏，但其技术规格仍保持不变。14.2 英寸屏幕的纵横比仍为 3:2，分辨率为 3,120 x 2,080 像素。相比之下，其刷新率提高到了 120 Hz。主观而言，它的画质令人印象深刻，内容描绘清晰锐利，色彩看起来超级鲜艳。与三星最新的有机发光二极管一样，尽管是触摸屏，但在描绘光线区域时不会出现光栅效应问题。

另一方面，华为的柔性 OLED 面板在亮度方面明显有别于三星的竞争产品--在标准 SDR 工作模式下，新款 MateBook X Pro 的平均亮度已达到 624 cd/m²（三星目前为 400 cd/m²）。在 HDR 工作模式下，差异就更大了，因为在显示图像摘录时，我们注意到最高亮度达到了 1,220 cd/m²。在显示几乎全白的画面时，我们测得的亮度为 911 cd/m²，这仍然是非常好的（三星：最大亮度约为 640 cd/m²）。这些数值令人震惊，目前在 OLED 笔记本电脑中是无与伦比的。OLED 面板没有任何背光渗色问题，响应速度也超快。此外，它还能通过传感器自动调节亮度和色温。


607 cd/m²	613 cd/m²	627 cd/m²
608 cd/m²	613 cd/m²	636 cd/m²
617 cd/m²	640 cd/m²	656 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

VisN236HUZ15 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 656 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 624.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 613 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 VisN236HUZ15, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.2"	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA ATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Samsung SDC417F ATNA40YK10-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Samsung ATNA40YK20-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14"
Display		-4%	1%	0%	1%	-7%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	99.8	97 -3%	99.8 0%	99.92 0%	99.7 0%	89.8 -10%	98.6 -1%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	99.4 -1%	99.9 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	94.6	85.2 -10%	97.6 3%	94.71 0%	98.2 4%	84.2 -11%	87.3 -8%
Response Times		-45%	-35%	-184%	-53%	2279%	-96%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.75 ?(0.4, 0.35)	0.83 ?(0.43, 0.4) -11%	0.69 ?(0.37, 0.32) 8%	2 ?(1, 1) -167%	0.91 ?(0.54, 0.37) -21%	20 ?(6, 14) -2567%	1.31 ?(0.69, 0.62) -75%
Response Time Black / White *	0.49 ?(0.25, 0.24)	0.69 ?(0.38, 0.31) -41%	0.71 ?(0.38, 0.33) -45%	2 ?(1, 1) -308%	0.76 ?(0.41, 0.35) -55%	7 ?(2, 5) -1329%	1.2 ?(0.61, 0.59) -145%
PWM Frequency	1440	240 ?(100) -83%	480 ?(80) -67%	350 -76%	240.3 -83%	156000 ?(50) 10733%	480 ?(99) -67%
Screen		-8%	6%	-36%	7%	-23%	6%
Brightness middle	613	392 -36%	391 -36%	384 -37%	417 -32%	595 -3%	387 -37%
Brightness	624	398 -36%	392 -37%	388 -38%	417 -33%	550 -12%	386 -38%
Brightness Distribution	93	97 4%	98 5%	97 4%	98 5%	85 -9%	98 5%
Black Level *			0.02	0.054		0.25	0.01
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.9	1.3 32%	1.1 42%	2.47 -30%	1.26 34%	2.01 -6%	1 47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.1	3.2 -3%	2.4 23%	4.33 -40%	3.6 -16%	6.9 -123%	2.4 23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.5			2.81 -87%	0.68 55%	1.22 19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.1	2.3 -10%	1.3 38%	2.63 -25%	1.3 38%	2.74 -30%	1.4 33%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.24 ^98%	2.17 ^101%	2.18 ^101%	2.27 ^97%	2.4 ^92%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	6447 ^101%	6517 ^100%	6336 ^103%	6279 ^104%	6355 ^102%	6319 ^103%	6466 ^101%
Contrast			19550	7111		2380	38700
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-19% / -16%	-9% / -6%	-73% / -62%	-15% / -8%	750% / 512%	-31% / -22%

* ... smaller is better

我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro2）对面板进行了分析，同时查看了所有不同的色彩配置文件。这对用户来说有点麻烦，因为标准配置是激活本地配置文件（P3），而您必须使用快捷键激活专业模式，该模式会激活摄影色彩配置文件（P3-65）。不过，在测试过程中，专业模式的效果较差，因此我们再次将其停用。其他配置文件可通过显示管理器获得，该管理器仅显示在 Windows 的第二个右键菜单中（右键单击桌面 -> 显示更多选项 -> 显示管理器）。根据华为的说法，所有设备都经过预校准，DeltaE-200 的平均偏差小于 1，但我们无法证实这一点。

CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：AdobeRGB，目标色彩空间：AdobeRGB）

CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：AdobeRGB，目标色彩空间：AdobeRGB）

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：AdobeRGB，目标色彩空间：AdobeRGB）

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Native 配置文件提供了一个良好的基础，没有色调或明显的色温偏差。其平均色彩偏差为 1.9，非常不错，只有个别颜色超过了 3 的重要临界值，偏差达到 3.1。如果使用 sRGB 和 AdobeRGB 配置文件，情况会更糟，因为偏差会更大。此外，AdobeRGB 色彩空间并没有完全覆盖。由于偏差较大，这意味着该面板不是编辑照片/视频的理想选择。

通过我们自己的校准（可在上面免费下载配置文件），与 P3 参考机型相比，我们能够在灰度和色彩方面略微改善显示效果。不过，在日常使用中还是没有必要这样做。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.25 ms rise
0.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.24 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.4 ms rise
0.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.35 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1440 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 1440 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 1440 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

OLED 面板采用 PWM 技术，但 MateBook X Pro 又一次将自己与竞争对手明显区分开来。它使用直流调光，亮度在 43% 以下为 240 Hz，亮度在 43% 以下为 1,440 Hz。这个数值非常高，因此用户即使在低亮度水平下使用笔记本电脑，也不会受到很大的限制。

OLED 触摸屏一般会反光，但反光程度不如三星Galaxy Book4 等产品。加上 SDR 的高亮度，即使在明亮的室外环境中，也能轻松使用该设备。在第一张照片中，你可以清楚地看到阳光直射下的补偿效果（对于反光显示屏而言）。对于其视角稳定性，我们也没有任何负面意见。

性能 - 配备 Meteor Lake H 处理器的 MateBook X Pro

新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 采用英特尔的 Meteor Lake 移动处理器，提供酷睿至尊 7 155H 和 16GB 内存，或酷睿至尊 9 185H 和 32GB 内存（LPDDR5x-6400）。不提供 64 GB 内存或更快的内存选项。

测试条件

华为为 MateBook X Pro 2024 提供两种不同的性能配置文件：平衡型和性能型。我们在下表中总结了它们各自的性能和排放值。默认情况下，MateBook 始终在 "性能"模式下启动，这也是我们在以下基准测试和测量中使用该模式的原因。原则上，平衡模式当然也能满足日常使用的需要，但总是需要手动切换到该模式，而且笔记本电脑不会自己记住设置，这一点非常恼人。

能源概况	CPU TDP	Cinebench R23 Multi	Time Spy 图形	最大风扇噪音排放
平衡	80 -> 36 瓦	13,199 分	3,280 分	39.9 分贝(A)
性能	80 -> 45 瓦	15,270 分	3,719 分	46.8 分贝(A)

处理器 - Core Ultra 9 185H

MateBook X Pro 2024 的顶级型号采用了最新的酷睿至尊 9 185H处理器。这是目前流星湖系列中速度最快的移动处理器，最高主频为 5.1 GHz。在 MateBook 内，该处理器短时间内的最大功耗为 80 瓦，之后在长期负载情况下，功耗会平衡在 45 瓦。鉴于其轻巧纤薄的机身，这些高功耗限制带来了相应的高性能值，测试设备也因此领先于竞争对手。虽然无法长时间保持高性能，但笔记本电脑的连续多核性能（-30%）还是很有竞争力的，与对比设备相比，总体上更好、更稳定。至少与其他英特尔竞争对手相比是这样，因为华硕 Zenbook 14配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS华硕 Zenbook 14 采用 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS，在 30 瓦的功耗下比酷睿 Ultra 9 在 45 瓦的功耗下获得了更好的性能。这充分说明英特尔芯片相比之下是多么低效。新的 Lunar Lake 芯片可能会在这方面有所帮助，但首批设备上市还需要几个月的时间，而 AMD 的 Zen5 芯片已经在研发之中。

在电池模式下，它的性能并没有降低，进一步的 CPU 基准测试可参见这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø1990 (1887.33-2694.15)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1454 (1146.23-2135.5)

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; Standard mode: Ø1477 (1223.99-2297.13)

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1209 (1178.03-1454.97)

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1920 (1441.75-2297.27)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1613 (1476.83-1993.62)

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø2166 (2149.96-2176.16)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	84.3 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	80.9 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	77 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	75.2 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	74.1 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 ^-2! Intel Core i7-1360P	68.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	67.7 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	66.8 pt
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	53.7 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (12688 - 19851, n=18)	17685 Points +16%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	15270 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	14583 (10835.5^min - 14582.8^max) Points -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	13888 Points -9%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12794 Points -16%
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=62, last 2 years)	11696 Points -23%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	11571 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11428 Points -25%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	8557 Points -44%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	1848 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1812 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1166 - 1912, n=18)	1789 Points -1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1772 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1746 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1730 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=62, last 2 years)	1672 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1664 Points -8%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	1596 Points -12%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4843 - 7651, n=18)	6824 Points +20%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5705 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5433 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	5414 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5104 Points -11%
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=58, last 2 years)	4544 Points -20%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	4526 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4413 Points -23%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	3273 Points -43%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	719 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (442 - 735, n=18)	690 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	688 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	679 Points -1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	673 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	657 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=58, last 2 years)	637 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	636 Points -8%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	611 Points -11%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1582 - 3165, n=20)	2719 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2694 (1887.33^min - 2694.15^max) Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2297.13 (1223.99^min - 2297.13^max) Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2297 (1441.75^min - 2297.27^max) Points -15%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2176 (2149.96^min - 2176.16^max) Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2136 (1146.23^min - 2135.5^max) Points -21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	2008 Points -25%
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=64, last 2 years)	1981 Points -26%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	1455 (1178.03^min - 1454.97^max) Points -46%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	268 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	267 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (191.9 - 281, n=18)	263 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	261 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	255 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=59, last 2 years)	250 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	248 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	238 Points -9%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	180 Points -31%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	387 Seconds * -65%
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=62, last 2 years)	358 Seconds * -52%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	297 Seconds * -26%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	295 Seconds * -26%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	270.8 Seconds * -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	241 Seconds * -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	235 Seconds *
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	226 Seconds * +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (163 - 285, n=18)	191.9 Seconds * +18%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51738 - 76331, n=18)	69105 MIPS +20%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	61047 MIPS +6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	57730 MIPS
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	53528 MIPS -7%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	51896 MIPS -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	48748 MIPS -16%
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=55, last 2 years)	48544 MIPS -16%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	45679 MIPS -21%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	36940 MIPS -36%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	6205 MIPS +10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	5717 MIPS +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5648 MIPS
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=57, last 2 years)	5487 MIPS -3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5470 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4199 - 5781, n=18)	5418 MIPS -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5410 MIPS -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5151 MIPS -9%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	4647 MIPS -18%

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13756 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9140 - 14540, n=18)	13580 Points -1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12971 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12171 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11786 Points -14%
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 15220, n=56, last 2 years)	11589 Points -16%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	11279 Points -18%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	8909 Points -35%

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2552 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2507 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3130, n=51, last 2 years)	2498 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2454 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1490 - 2573, n=18)	2431 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2420 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2287 Points -9%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	2003 Points -20%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9330 - 14230, n=18)	13130 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	12822 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12469 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11567 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10951 Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years)	10105 Points -21%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	9897 Points -23%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	8909 Points -31%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	8621 Points -33%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1942 Points +6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1839 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1805 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	1792 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years)	1786 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (986 - 1902, n=18)	1782 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1768 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1691 Points -8%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	1435 Points -22%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (14.1 - 22.7, n=18)	19.9 fps +26%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	17 fps +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.1 fps +2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	15.8 fps
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	14 fps -11%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=57, last 2 years)	13 fps -18%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	12.7 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11.9 fps -25%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	9.89 fps -37%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=57, last 2 years)	54.7 s * -42%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	49.6 s * -29%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	47.8 s * -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	46.4 s * -21%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	46.1 s * -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.8 s * -16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (34.5 - 62, n=18)	44.6 s * -16%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	40.3 s * -5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	38.5 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	0.566 sec * -25%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=57, last 2 years)	0.517 sec * -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.511 sec * -13%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4996 sec * -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4789 sec * -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (0.4313 - 0.759, n=19)	0.4712 sec * -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	0.4578 sec * -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	0.4525 sec *
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	0.4521 sec * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

261 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2694 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

168.2 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5705 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

688 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1812 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

15270 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

828 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

108 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	87.9 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	86.1 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	73.1 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	65.2 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	60.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	57.6 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	56.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	52.2 pt
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48.5 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	22269 KRay/s +84%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=18)	16273 KRay/s +35%
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=57, last 2 years)	12854 KRay/s +6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	12075 KRay/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	9618 KRay/s -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	8899 KRay/s -26%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	8627 KRay/s -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	8569 KRay/s -29%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7838 KRay/s -35%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	93550 Points +47%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=18)	84562 Points +33%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	63748 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=57, last 2 years)	61147 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48441 Points -24%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	47266 Points -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	45333 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	43630 Points -32%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	41145 Points -35%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	4132 MB/s +35%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=18)	3964 MB/s +30%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	3060 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=57, last 2 years)	2889 MB/s -6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2404 MB/s -21%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2290 MB/s -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2065 MB/s -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1940 MB/s -37%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1930 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	99874 Points +17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=18)	89440 Points +5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	89068 Points +5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	85817 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	85010 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	81758 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	80348 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=57, last 2 years)	79858 Points -6%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	74566 Points -12%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	13731 Points +55%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=18)	10503 Points +19%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	8851 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=57, last 2 years)	8152 Points -8%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7326 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7257 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7034 Points -21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6597 Points -25%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5415 Points -39%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	49687 Points +60%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=18)	41496 Points +34%
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=57, last 2 years)	31778 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	31021 Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	23884 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	22705 Points -27%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	22621 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	21139 Points -32%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	19395 Points -37%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	116441 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=18)	91410 MB/s -21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	87671 MB/s -25%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	76247 MB/s -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	64363 MB/s -45%
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years)	60135 MB/s -48%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	50795 MB/s -56%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	45713 MB/s -61%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	37967 MB/s -67%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=18)	1156 MB/s +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	918 MB/s +8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	849 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=57, last 2 years)	743 MB/s -12%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	689 MB/s -19%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	686 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	557 MB/s -34%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	549 MB/s -35%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	468 MB/s -45%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	11637 KRay/s +79%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=18)	8523 KRay/s +31%
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=57, last 2 years)	6682 KRay/s +3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	6503 KRay/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5193 KRay/s -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	4660 KRay/s -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	4503 KRay/s -31%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	4379 KRay/s -33%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4129 KRay/s -37%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (44809 - 53918, n=18)	49034 MPixel/s +7%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	48270 MPixel/s +6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	45628 MPixel/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44535 MPixel/s -2%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44495 MPixel/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	43772 MPixel/s -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	40426 MPixel/s -11%
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=57, last 2 years)	40259 MPixel/s -12%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	35861 MPixel/s -21%

系统性能

在合成系统基准测试中，新款 MateBook X Pro 的表现同样出色，经常大大领先于竞争对手。平心而论，你不得不承认，所有现代笔记本电脑在日常使用中都非常快，你不会真正注意到各个对比设备之间的真正差异。在测试过程中，MateBook 对输入的响应速度非常快，而且我们没有发现任何系统稳定性问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	7403 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (6771 - 7510, n=5)	7204 Points -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7157 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	6751 Points -9%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6527 Points -12%
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=50, last 2 years)	6435 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	6331 Points -14%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	5672 Points -23%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5621 Points -24%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	11331 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (10135 - 11331, n=5)	10820 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10732 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	10662 Points -6%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10630 Points -6%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10526 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	10502 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=50, last 2 years)	10479 Points -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	9883 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10449 Points +11%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	9384 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8797 - 10484, n=5)	9322 Points -1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9031 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	8778 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=50, last 2 years)	8624 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	8030 Points -14%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	7244 Points -23%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	7180 Points -23%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	10353 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8793 - 10781, n=5)	10092 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	9056 Points -13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8873 Points -14%
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=50, last 2 years)	8086 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	8043 Points -22%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7939 Points -23%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	6982 Points -33%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6259 Points -40%

CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	1971 Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1876 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1675 - 1971, n=5)	1792 Points -9%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1698 Points -14%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1656 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1643 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	1630 Points -17%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1605 Points -19%
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=55, last 2 years)	1580 Points -20%

CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	1875 Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1829 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1589 - 1875, n=5)	1702 Points -9%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1658 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1584 Points -16%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1583 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	1564 Points -17%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1523 Points -19%
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=55, last 2 years)	1523 Points -19%

CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	2102 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1883 - 2102, n=5)	1977 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1917 Points -9%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1863 Points -11%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1842 Points -12%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1817 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	1813 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1782 Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=55, last 2 years)	1733 Points -18%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1899 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	1889 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1329 - 1889, n=5)	1568 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1438 Points -24%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1435 Points -24%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1428 Points -24%
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=55, last 2 years)	1349 Points -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	1342 Points -29%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1201 Points -36%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	440 Points +50%
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=57, last 2 years)	305 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	294 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	293 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (264 - 293, n=5)	280 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	269 Points -8%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	255 Points -13%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	249 Points -15%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	266.6 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	258 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (248 - 267, n=5)	256 Points -4%
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=55, last 2 years)	256 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	248 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	246 Points -8%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	243.5 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	234 Points -12%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	218 Points -18%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	612 ms * -17%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	610 ms * -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	562 ms * -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	544 ms * -4%
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=64, last 2 years)	528 ms * -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	522 ms *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (508 - 532, n=5)	522 ms * -0%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	521 ms * -0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	518 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7403 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	95353 MB/s +18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88119 MB/s +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (69929 - 95718, n=18)	84684 MB/s +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	84290 MB/s +4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	80867 MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	76766 MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=57, last 2 years)	70921 MB/s -12%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	68974 MB/s -15%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64187 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	87297 MB/s +15%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	85295 MB/s +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (64619 - 87768, n=18)	80059 MB/s +6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	75722 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75550 MB/s 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=57, last 2 years)	67694 MB/s -11%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	63509 MB/s -16%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	58321 MB/s -23%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	57933 MB/s -23%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	107658 MB/s +42%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	83155 MB/s +10%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	82872 MB/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75930 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	75866 MB/s
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	74292 MB/s -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117897, n=57, last 2 years)	74034 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51114 - 93871, n=18)	72390 MB/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	72172 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	154.2 ns * -11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (121.4 - 259, n=18)	145.8 ns * -5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	138.3 ns *
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	137.3 ns * +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	132.3 ns * +4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	114.5 ns * +17%
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=57, last 2 years)	107.1 ns * +23%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	106.4 ns * +23%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	95.4 ns * +31%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试（网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时没有受到任何限制。虽然有一个驱动程序出现故障，但重要的 "中断到处理延迟 "值很低。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	6070.1 μs * -884%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2087.5 μs * -238%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	1751.4 μs * -184%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1550 μs * -151%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1102.5 μs * -79%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	616.7 μs *
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	435.7 μs * +29%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的高端测试设备配备了 2 TB 版本的 WD SN740。这款 M.2 2280 固态硬盘通过 PCIe 4.0 连接，传输速率超过 5 GB/s。此外，即使在长时间负载的情况下，其性能也能保持完全稳定。这对于快速固态硬盘来说并不总是必然的。一个令人困惑的主要问题仍然是制造商对固态硬盘的分区，因为在首次启动设备后，系统硬盘上只有 145 GB 是空闲的。因此，如果你在安装和下载时不小心，很快就会收到硬盘已满的提示。这根本不切实际，也没有必要。更多固态硬盘基准测试这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5028 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4481 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 866 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 790 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 68.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 231 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2111 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2050 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	80.6 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	73.7 pt
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	73.5 pt
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	65.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	64 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	61.6 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	60.8 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	49.9 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	46.2 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3934 (3872.6^min - 3934.05^max) MB/s +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	3454 (3421.58^min - 3453.8^max) MB/s +6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	3268 (3212.21^min - 3267.78^max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 4501, n=57, last 2 years)	2929 MB/s -10%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (1734 - 3494, n=3)	2832 MB/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2690 (2667.9^min - 2690.44^max) MB/s -18%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2379 (2365.59^min - 2378.73^max) MB/s -27%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2156 (2126.3^min - 2155.87^max) MB/s -34%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2089 (1958.25^min - 2089.39^max) MB/s -36%
seq write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	4479 (4368.79^min - 4479.46^max) MB/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3772 (213.28^min - 3772.36^max) MB/s -16%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3522 (3235.7^min - 3521.96^max) MB/s -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	3258 (2856.06^min - 3257.7^max) MB/s -27%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (1597 - 4479, n=3)	3119 MB/s -30%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 5344, n=57, last 2 years)	2936 MB/s -34%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2604 (2525.41^min - 2604.03^max) MB/s -42%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2388 (2203.69^min - 2388.49^max) MB/s -47%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2309 (2175.85^min - 2309.38^max) MB/s -48%
seq q8 t1 read
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6978 (5832.18^min - 6977.55^max) MB/s +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	6861 (6174.88^min - 6861.46^max) MB/s +31%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	5252 (4708.3^min - 5251.69^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (5120 - 5252, n=3)	5170 MB/s -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 7155, n=57, last 2 years)	5111 MB/s -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	4886 (4359.86^min - 4886.36^max) MB/s -7%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4671 (3796.43^min - 4671.2^max) MB/s -11%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4504 (3696.49^min - 4504.05^max) MB/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	3596 (3014.03^min - 3596.41^max) MB/s -32%
seq q8 t1 write
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6149 (6105.44^min - 6149.48^max) MB/s +37%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	5454 (5383.53^min - 5454.06^max) MB/s +21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	4503 (4392.07^min - 4503.21^max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 6810, n=57, last 2 years)	4031 MB/s -10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3881 (113.46^min - 3881.41^max) MB/s -14%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (1617 - 4503, n=3)	3173 MB/s -30%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3164 (3094.35^min - 3164.36^max) MB/s -30%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3105 (3076.1^min - 3105.46^max) MB/s -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2446 (2406.49^min - 2445.7^max) MB/s -46%
4k q1 t1 read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	75.8 (74.48^min - 75.75^max) MB/s +12%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	74.3 (72.71^min - 74.33^max) MB/s +10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	67.4 (66.77^min - 67.43^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (54.1 - 67.4, n=3)	61.9 MB/s -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (8.27 - 87.4, n=57, last 2 years)	61.3 MB/s -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	53.5 (53.24^min - 53.45^max) MB/s -21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	43.7 (23.85^min - 43.65^max) MB/s -35%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	34.6 (34.41^min - 34.64^max) MB/s -49%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	29.4 (29.32^min - 29.4^max) MB/s -56%
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	360 (353.95^min - 359.55^max) MB/s +43%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	252 (249.66^min - 252.37^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (87.7 - 252, n=3)	181.6 MB/s -28%
Average of class Subnotebook (12 - 360, n=57, last 2 years)	159.8 MB/s -37%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	157.7 (151.37^min - 157.68^max) MB/s -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	157.4 (157.1^min - 157.44^max) MB/s -38%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	149.4 (143.79^min - 149.44^max) MB/s -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	117.9 (117.39^min - 117.9^max) MB/s -53%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	84.9 (82.69^min - 84.93^max) MB/s -66%
4k q32 t16 read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	2684 (2611.54^min - 2684.42^max) MB/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2252 (2223.45^min - 2252.41^max) MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1827 (1806.76^min - 1827.02^max) MB/s -32%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (308 - 2684, n=3)	1422 MB/s -47%
Average of class Subnotebook (11.1 - 4286, n=57, last 2 years)	1281 MB/s -52%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	909 (848.35^min - 908.51^max) MB/s -66%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	749 (367.29^min - 748.63^max) MB/s -72%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	624 (570.35^min - 624.14^max) MB/s -77%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	283 (280.76^min - 282.69^max) MB/s -89%
4k q32 t16 write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	2669 (2574.17^min - 2669.35^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (209 - 2669, n=3)	1728 MB/s -35%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1709 (1672.77^min - 1708.93^max) MB/s -36%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	1611 (217.51^min - 1610.59^max) MB/s -40%
Average of class Subnotebook (14.2 - 4189, n=57, last 2 years)	881 MB/s -67%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	435 (416.7^min - 435.33^max) MB/s -84%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	396 (367.7^min - 396.43^max) MB/s -85%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	364 (358.35^min - 363.86^max) MB/s -86%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	222 (208.14^min - 221.73^max) MB/s -92%

AS SSD
Score Total
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	6213 Points +23%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	5035 Points
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4914 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	4895 Points -3%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (4065 - 5035, n=3)	4652 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	4401 Points -13%
Average of class Subnotebook (515 - 8892, n=56, last 2 years)	4350 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3408 Points -32%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3295 Points -35%
Score Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2872 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1916 Points +21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	1577 Points
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (872 - 2081, n=3)	1510 Points -4%
Average of class Subnotebook (246 - 3307, n=56, last 2 years)	1379 Points -13%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1232 Points -22%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1217 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	1116 Points -29%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	787 Points -50%
Score Write
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3125 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	2817 Points +7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	2642 Points
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (1726 - 2803, n=3)	2390 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (153 - 4469, n=56, last 2 years)	2322 Points -12%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2186 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2038 Points -23%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	1894 Points -28%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1632 Points -38%
Seq Read
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	5421.49 MB/s +33%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5228 MB/s +28%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	4090 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (448 - 5525, n=56, last 2 years)	3992 MB/s -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3934 MB/s -4%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3900 MB/s -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3675 MB/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	3186 MB/s -22%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (193.2 - 4189, n=4)	3164 MB/s -23%
Seq Write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	4114 MB/s
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3432 MB/s -17%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3205 MB/s -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	3061.96 MB/s -26%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (80.9 - 4114, n=4)	2710 MB/s -34%
Average of class Subnotebook (99 - 4961, n=56, last 2 years)	2601 MB/s -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2234 MB/s -46%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2172 MB/s -47%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1996 MB/s -51%
4K Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	96.2 MB/s +78%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	62.83 MB/s +17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	62.2 MB/s +15%
Average of class Subnotebook (19.8 - 96.2, n=56, last 2 years)	58.5 MB/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	54.95 MB/s +2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	53.9 MB/s
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (50.2 - 53.9, n=3)	51.6 MB/s -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	51 MB/s -5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	48.1 MB/s -11%
4K Write
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	206.5 MB/s +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	204 MB/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	189.9 MB/s -7%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	177.1 MB/s -13%
Average of class Subnotebook (37.4 - 256, n=56, last 2 years)	176.4 MB/s -14%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	168.1 MB/s -18%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (117.7 - 204, n=3)	158 MB/s -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	149.39 MB/s -27%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	145.4 MB/s -29%
4K-64 Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2382 MB/s +114%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1535 MB/s +38%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	1114 MB/s
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (403 - 1611, n=3)	1043 MB/s -6%
Average of class Subnotebook (181.8 - 2682, n=56, last 2 years)	921 MB/s -17%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	798 MB/s -28%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	646 MB/s -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	518.62 MB/s -53%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	349 MB/s -69%
4K-64 Write
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2575 MB/s +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	2361.9 MB/s +17%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	2026 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (105.9 - 3905, n=56, last 2 years)	1882 MB/s -7%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (1220 - 2374, n=3)	1873 MB/s -8%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1818 MB/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1669 MB/s -18%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	1384 MB/s -32%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1238 MB/s -39%
Access Time Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	0.136 ms * -518%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	0.082 ms * -273%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.02 - 0.167, n=56, last 2 years)	0.05746 ms * -161%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.05 ms * -127%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (0.022 - 0.075, n=3)	0.04167 ms * -89%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	0.039 ms * -77%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.023 ms * -5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.022 ms * -0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	0.022 ms *
Access Time Write
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.102 ms * -410%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.1 ms * -400%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	0.081 ms * -305%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.017 - 0.352, n=56, last 2 years)	0.07518 ms * -276%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	0.032 ms * -60%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	0.03 ms * -50%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (0.02 - 0.033, n=3)	0.02567 ms * -28%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	0.02 ms *
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.018 ms * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5229 (4950.07-5240.99)

图形卡 - Intel Arc Graphics

Core Ultra 9 185H 配备了快速版的新英特尔 Arc Graphics，它拥有 8 个 Xe 内核，最高主频可达 2.35 GHz。与旧版 Iris Xe Graphics G7 相比，英特尔大幅提升了其性能，这就是为什么新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 在 GPU 测试中提供的功率几乎是 2023 型号的两倍。 2023 型号的两倍。此外，这是迄今为止我们测试过的最快的 Arc iGPU 之一。AMD 的 Radeon 780M在合成测试中也明显落于下风。

在过去的几个月中，英特尔一直在为其新的 Arc iGPU 不断发布驱动程序更新，这款机型的游戏性能也得益于此。事实上，在实际游戏测试中，MateBook X Pro 2024 将Zenbook 14 的 Radeon 780M 甩在了身后，但在合成测试中，它的领先优势要小得多，两款机型的表现几乎一样。在游戏测试中，新的 Arc iGPU 比 MateBook X Pro 2023 内的旧版 Iris Xe 图形处理器 "只 "高出约 50%。

在Time Spy 压力测试（99.3%）和Witcher 3 循环测试中，MateBook X Pro 2024 的 GPU 性能保持完全稳定。此外，在电池模式下，其性能也没有降低。更多 GPU 基准测试，请访问技术版块。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	99.4 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	89.9 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	88.6 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	88.2 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	83.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	75 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	73.8 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 ^-1! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	53.6 pt
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	48.9 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13556 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	12999 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12230 Points -10%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8064 - 13716, n=35)	11984 Points -12%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9702 Points -28%
Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=54, last 2 years)	9617 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9085 Points -33%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	6752 Points -50%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	5885 Points -57%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	9160 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8561 Points -7%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	8441 Points -8%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5568 - 9692, n=39)	8302 Points -9%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7673 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7278 Points -21%
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=58, last 2 years)	6978 Points -24%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	5477 Points -40%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	5354 Points -42%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3719 Points
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (2018 - 3770, n=42)	3231 Points -13%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3206 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3001 Points -19%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2876 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2846 Points -23%
Average of class Subnotebook (999 - 4501, n=59, last 2 years)	2571 Points -31%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	1656 Points -55%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	1495 Points -60%

Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	34628 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33583 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	30817 Points -8%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (17193 - 37639, n=41)	30130 Points -10%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	30010 Points -11%
Average of class Subnotebook (11490 - 58402, n=57, last 2 years)	27725 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	25139 Points -25%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	20881 Points -38%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	20322 Points -39%

Geekbench 6.3 - GPU OpenCL
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	36741 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35267 Points -4%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (17911 - 39941, n=41)	32332 Points -12%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32096 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	29185 Points -21%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	28473 Points -23%
Average of class Subnotebook (10125 - 52427, n=50, last 2 years)	26684 Points -27%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	16121 Points -56%

3DMark 11 Performance		13398 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		8516 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		4088 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	709 Seconds * -72%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	562 Seconds * -36%
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=59, last 2 years)	558 Seconds * -35%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	537 Seconds * -30%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	535 Seconds * -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	437 Seconds * -6%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (294 - 692, n=38)	430 Seconds * -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	412 Seconds *
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	369 Seconds * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	93.7 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	90.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	78.9 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	75.3 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	67.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	63.3 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	63.3 pt
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	50.8 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.6 (27^min, 27^P1) fps +14%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	25.9 (16^min, 22^P1) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	25.5 (23^min) fps -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years)	21.8 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.4 (16^min, 18^P1) fps -21%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	19.2 (11^min, 13^P1) fps -26%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.4 fps -37%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10 fps -61%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.7 (2.69^min, 16.4^P1) fps +34%
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=54, last 2 years)	19.5 fps +2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	19.2 (2.77^min, 14.5^P1) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	14.2 (2.16^min, 9.09^P1) fps -26%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	14.1 (0.852^min, 2.6^P1) fps -27%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.5 (6.52^min, 7.87^P1) fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	11 (0.636^min, 4.48^P1) fps -43%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.7 (3.95^min, 7.94^P1) fps -44%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.8 fps
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.6 fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	23.9 fps -22%
Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=60, last 2 years)	23.3 fps -24%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	21.2 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	21 fps -32%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	19 fps -38%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.7 fps -52%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	56 fps
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49 fps -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	47 (5.9^min, 9.85^P1) fps -16%
Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=60, last 2 years)	40.2 fps -28%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	38.8 (5^min, 9.64^P1) fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	31 fps -45%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.7 (6.7^min, 10.1^P1) fps -49%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24.6 (5^min, 7^P1) fps -56%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	80.9 (51.2^min) fps
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	75 (63.4^min) fps -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	72.3 (50.8^min) fps -11%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	63.9 (44.2^min) fps -21%
Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=62, last 2 years)	62.6 fps -23%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	59.6 (50.1^min) fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	59.6 (44^min) fps -26%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	53.4 (44.6^min) fps -34%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	43.9 fps
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.8 fps -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35.7 fps -19%
Average of class Subnotebook (20.7 - 97.1, n=56, last 2 years)	34.1 fps -22%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	32.3 fps -26%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.4 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	31.2 fps -29%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.2 fps -31%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core: Ø25.9 (16-28)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	158.8	148.1	48.9	19.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	158	97	57	25.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	105	99.9	80.6	80.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	80.1	43.4	30.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	66.6	51.9	43.9
Far Cry 5 (2018)	69	47	43	41
Strange Brigade (2018)	188	82	69	56
F1 23 (2023)	89.3	79.8	54.5	15
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	36.4	30.2	27.6	24.7

排放物 - 冷却装置略微过载

噪音排放

根据华为的说法，它的散热得到了改进，正如我们已经看到的那样，对于如此轻薄的设备来说，它的功率限制是非常高的。不过，在日常使用中（无论使用哪种能源模式）并不会保持非常安静，即使在空闲模式下，风扇也会经常运转。在执行简单任务时，噪音就已达到 34 dB（A）左右。这个噪音相当高，很快就会让人厌烦。此外，两种能量曲线的表现几乎完全相同，在我们的压力测试中，性能模式的噪音甚至比平衡模式更大（46.8 对 39.9 分贝（A））。在这里，更好的分级是有意义的。

Noise Level

Idle		24.8 / 29.8 / 29.8 dB(A)
Load		34 / 46.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.8 dB(A)

	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Noise		10%	9%	6%	11%	0%	5%
off / environment *	24.8	24.5 1%	23.4 6%	25 -1%	23.8 4%	25.4 -2%	25.1 -1%
Idle Minimum *	24.8	24.5 1%	23.4 6%	25 -1%	24 3%	25.4 -2%	25.1 -1%
Idle Average *	29.8	24.5 18%	23.4 21%	25 16%	24 19%	25.4 15%	25.1 16%
Idle Maximum *	29.8	24.5 18%	24.5 18%	25 16%	24 19%	29.6 1%	25.1 16%
Load Average *	34	32.4 5%	39.3 -16%	37 -9%	31.5 7%	42 -24%	35.9 -6%
Witcher 3 ultra *	39.9	36.7 8%	35.9 10%	37 7%	37.8 5%		39.3 2%
Load Maximum *	46.8	36.7 22%	39.3 16%	40.62 13%	37.8 19%	40.9 13%	42.2 10%

* ... smaller is better

温度

当笔记本电脑空转和日常使用时，处理器周围的区域已经明显发热，将笔记本电脑放在大腿上时也能明显感觉到。不过，这通常不会造成任何限制，而且新机型的性能实际上比旧机型略胜一筹 MateBook X Pro 2023.当设备处于负载状态时也是如此，我们在底部测得的最高温度略低于 43 °C。我们在键盘中间区域测得的 43 °C温度让人感觉不那么舒适；虽然仍然可以打字，但在这种极端情况下，手指会变得非常热。另一个问题是 90 瓦的电源装置，在负载情况下（游戏时和压力测试时）温度高达 60-65 °C，实在太高了。

在 CPU/GPU 合并负载的压力测试中，我们最初测得处理器的负载为 80 瓦，随后处理器的负载立即降至 40 瓦。在平衡模式下，我们也在短时间内测得了 80 瓦的功率，但随后功率下降，几分钟后稳定在 25 瓦。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


42 °C	43.2 °C	41.4 °C
38.2 °C	42.4 °C	39.4 °C
26.7 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 43.2 °C
Average: 36.4 °C


42 °C	42 °C	41.9 °C
39.1 °C	40.9 °C	38.3 °C
27.4 °C	29.1 °C	27.7 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 36.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 65.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


28.5 °C	29.3 °C	28.6 °C
26.9 °C	27.9 °C	27.1 °C
25 °C	24.9 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 29.3 °C
Average: 27 °C


29.4 °C	29.7 °C	29.3 °C
27.2 °C	28.6 °C	27 °C
25.4 °C	26.1 °C	25.6 °C

Maximum: 29.7 °C
Average: 27.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 30 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41.9 °C	44.4 °C	41.8 °C
37.4 °C	43.6 °C	39.3 °C
27.2 °C	27 °C	27.1 °C

Maximum: 44.4 °C
Average: 36.6 °C


43.9 °C	43.6 °C	43.4 °C
39.6 °C	42.4 °C	38.6 °C
28.5 °C	29.6 °C	27.7 °C

Maximum: 43.9 °C
Average: 37.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 59 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.1 °C / 1.9 F).

	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
Heat		7%	7%	9%	-1%	-11%	1%
Maximum Upper Side *	43.2	41 5%	40.9 5%	36.3 16%	44.2 -2%	46.5 -8%	43.1 -0%
Maximum Bottom *	42	44.2 -5%	46.8 -11%	36.8 12%	41.2 2%	44.7 -6%	50.2 -20%
Idle Upper Side *	29.3	25.3 14%	24.1 18%	29.2 -0%	29.4 -0%	34.9 -19%	25.8 12%
Idle Bottom *	29.7	26.2 12%	24.6 17%	27.4 8%	31.2 -5%	32.9 -11%	26.4 11%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

MateBook X Pro 2024 的音响系统由六个扬声器组成，与旧款 MateBook X Pro 2023 相比，华为在音质方面有所改进。它的声音洪亮而充沛--只是由于笔记本的设计，低音略显不足。即便如此，这也是其他笔记本电脑存在的问题，目前我们的数据库中还没有更好的音响系统。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 显示屏太亮会耗尽电池

耗电量

功耗主要由 OLED 面板决定，我们在最大 SDR 亮度下的空闲模式下测得的最大功耗为 16.4 瓦，明显高于大多数同类设备，是采用 IPS 面板的前代产品的两倍多。在这种情况下，你只需为如此高的亮度付出代价，在 HDR 模式下，面板的功耗甚至更高。在负载情况下，设备需要的最大功率为 94 瓦，因此设备会短暂达到电源装置的极限。在接下来的压力测试过程中，耗电量稳定在 75 瓦左右。因此，我们可以说 90 瓦的供电装置总体上太弱了。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.42 / 1.37 Watt
Idle	9.3 / 16 / 16.4 Watt
Load	67.3 / 94.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.2"	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 1920x1200, 14"	Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		40%	32%	43%	35%	32%	46%	29%	41%
Idle Minimum *	9.3	5.7 39%	6.1 34%	3.58 62%	3.9 58%	4.1 56%	3.6 61%	5.41 ?(1.8 - 10.3, n=37) 42%	4.47 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=59, last 2 years) 52%
Idle Average *	16	8.7 46%	10 37%	7.125 55%	5.8 64%	6.6 59%	6.6 59%	8.64 ?(4.2 - 16, n=37) 46%	7.63 ?(2.5 - 16, n=59, last 2 years) 52%
Idle Maximum *	16.4	8.9 46%	10.3 37%	12.1 26%	16 2%	8 51%	7.4 55%	12.1 ?(4.5 - 49, n=37) 26%	9.57 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=59, last 2 years) 42%
Load Average *	67.3	44.5 34%	53.3 21%	40.67 40%	46.1 32%	61 9%	47.1 30%	54.2 ?(31.3 - 76.2, n=36) 19%	46.5 ?(19.1 - 78.6, n=57, last 2 years) 31%
Witcher 3 ultra *	64.6	36.9 43%	42 35%		50.4 22%	56 13%	47.4 27%
Load Maximum *	94.3	65.2 31%	67 29%	64.2 32%	67.4 29%	90 5%	54.3 42%	85 ?(60 - 144.9, n=37) 10%	68.5 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=59, last 2 years) 27%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø64.6 (53.6-70.9)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø78.2 (74.1-94.4)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø14.2 (12.7-15.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø63.1 (56.3-92.4)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø92.3 (92.2-92.4)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø39.6 (34.9-43.7)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø83.3 (70.7-92.9)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø66.8 (57.6-78.4)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø61 (59.1-75.7)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø11.7 (9.7-13.7)

运行时间

华为将新机型的电池容量从 60 Wh 提高到了 70 Wh，但即便如此，其 WLAN 运行时间还是略有缩短。在 150 cd/m²（相当于测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 58%）的 WLAN 测试中，MateBook 的续航时间为 8 分 19 秒。这比旧款少了 80 分钟，但比Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 多了 40 分钟。在全亮度的 WLAN 测试中，我们只用了大约 5 个小时，但你不应该忘记 MateBook 的亮度有多高。Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 能多用 1 小时，但它的显示屏比 MateBook 暗 200 多 cd/m²。当以 150 cd/m² 的亮度播放视频内容时，我们测得了约 12.5 小时的好成绩，而在全亮度条件下播放 HDR 视频仅用了 4.5 小时。

在负载情况下，笔记本电脑在最差情况下 70 分钟后就会关闭，而在设备打开的情况下，充满一次电需要 93 分钟。在我们的测试中，启动快速充电模式并没有进一步缩短充电时间。

请注意：与 Galaxy Book4 Pro 14一样，MateBook X Pro 2024 的活动信号模式仍为 120 赫兹，即使我们将频率降至 60 赫兹。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		8h 19min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		4h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 36min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 10min

	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 63 Wh	Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh	LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 57 Wh	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		21%	56%	42%	-4%	21%	56%	44%
H.264	756	917 21%	1010 34%	603 -20%		527 -30%	1046 38%	911 ?(527 - 1298, n=27, last 2 years) 21%
WiFi v1.3	499	458 -8%	707 42%	700 40%	466 -7%	580 16%	774 55%	727 ?(389 - 1585, n=61, last 2 years) 46%
Load	70	104 49%	134 91%	145 107%	70 0%	124 77%	123 76%	115.7 ?(57 - 197, n=47, last 2 years) 65%

Pros

+ 轻质镁合金外壳，触感极佳

+ 令人印象深刻的 OLED 显示屏

+ 出色的输入设备

+ 出色的系统性能

+ 出色的扬声器

+ 2TB 固态硬盘

+ 电池模式下性能不减

Cons

- 焊接式内存和难以维护的选择

- 超薄机身导致机箱稳定性下降

- 无 3.5 毫米插孔

- 日常使用中风扇活动频繁

- 不必要的固态硬盘分区

- 电源在负载情况下温度很高，而且功率不足

评语：2024 MateBook X Pro 的显示屏和重量令人印象深刻，但需要做出妥协

华为 MateBook X Pro 2024 评测。测试设备由华为德国公司提供。

初次见到新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 时，其轻巧的机身和出色的触感立刻让人眼前一亮。此外，它的 OLED 触摸屏拥有出色的画质，而且输入设备和扬声器也是移动领域中最好的。不过，与 2023 机型相比，其轻薄的机身确实有一些妥协。但首先要说明的是。

除了重量轻之外，用户体验的主要特点是笔记本电脑采用了全新的 OLED 显示屏，与三星的竞争对手相比，它具有出色的画质和更高的亮度值。超过 600 尼特的 SDR 亮度加上低反射水平，使 MateBook 可以在户外轻松使用。由于刷新率高，PWM 闪烁对大多数用户来说都不是问题。另一方面，随机提供的 sRGB 和 AdobeRGB 色彩配置文件并不是最准确的，这意味着该设备并不适合图像编辑。

机箱本身的稳定性有所下降，而且其显示屏盖子特别灵活--这可能会导致一些令人不快的噪音。中间的键盘区域也会被轻微压入，但在每次使用时，这都不会成为问题。说到连接选项，3.5 毫米插孔的缺失尤其令人遗憾，但反过来，输入设备的不变也是一个积极因素。它的键盘输入手感极佳，可以轻松与最好的商务笔记本电脑相媲美。不过，令人遗憾的是，华为仍然让用户很难买到组件。

新款华为 MateBook X Pro 2024 的低重量、出色的画质和高亮度 OLED 触摸屏给人留下了深刻印象。酷睿至尊 9 185H 的性能同样令人印象深刻，但其代价是风扇活动频繁--即使在执行简单任务时也是如此。

现在来谈谈这款笔记本电脑的性能，这是一把双刃剑。总体而言，酷睿至尊 9 185H 的性能非常出色，功耗限制也很高。同时，这也是英特尔最新 CPU 的最大问题，因为大功率需要大量电力。反过来，这也反映在该设备的风扇活动几乎是持续不断的，即使是在执行日常任务时也会明显发热。此外，它的电源太弱，在负载情况下也会发热。遗憾的是，它的高效模式几乎无法改善风扇活动，我们希望看到一个性能水平降低的静音模式。总而言之，MateBook X Pro 只需要一个更高效的处理器，但英特尔（目前）还没有合适的处理器。对于 MateBook X Pro 来说，25 瓦的 AMD Zen4 或 Zen5 处理器将是理想的散热选择，同时还能让它在性能方面与其他产品竞争。

它的电池续航能力一般，当然这主要取决于屏幕亮度。如果你要求设备在室外一直保持全亮度（与其他笔记本电脑相比，这样才能舒适地工作），那么如果你发现它的续航时间缩短了，也不必感到惊讶。

MateBook X Pro 2024 最大的竞争对手是三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 14但它的 OLED 屏幕更暗、反光更强。更重的Galaxy Book4 的外壳稳定性更好，而 MateBook 的输入设备更好，性能也更强。LG Style 14 LG Style 14重量也不到 1 千克，几乎可以被动运行，但它的 OLED 显示屏较暗，输入设备较弱。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 可在一系列在线零售商处购买，价格从美元 2,224.30 起。.

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 - 06/05/2024 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

81 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

90%

Pointing Device

100%

Connectivity

61 / 75 → 81%

Weight

75 / 20-75 → 100%

Battery

85%

Display

93%

Games Performance

80 / 78 → 100%

Application Performance

90 / 85 → 100%

Temperature

79%

Noise

85%

Audio

92 / 91 → 100%

Camera

44 / 85 → 51%

Average

81%

89%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 343 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 463597 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为 MateBook X Pro 2024 笔记本电脑评测--980 克重的镁合金超极本，令人印象深刻的 OLED 面板

Andreas Osthoff, 2024-06- 7 (Update: 2024-06- 7)

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 (min) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28.1
...
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA i5-13500, UHD Graphics 770	822
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU	824
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	824
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	828
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	844
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	844
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	846
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Asus GL704GM-DH74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	13334
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13338
Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	13368
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	13398
Beelink SER8 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13420
Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13425
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13430
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 浅蓝色镁合金

尺寸比较

连接性 - 华为取消了耳机插孔

交流

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备 - MateBook X Pro 仍配备出色的键盘

显示屏 - 柔性 OLED，亮度超过 1,200 尼特

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 配备 Meteor Lake H 处理器的 MateBook X Pro

测试条件

处理器 - Core Ultra 9 185H

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡 - Intel Arc Graphics

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放物 - 冷却装置略微过载

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 audio analysis

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA audio analysis

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG audio analysis

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 audio analysis

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 audio analysis

电源管理 - 显示屏太亮会耗尽电池

耗电量

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Pros

Cons

评语：2024 MateBook X Pro 的显示屏和重量令人印象深刻，但需要做出妥协

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison