华为 MateBook X Pro 2024 笔记本电脑评测--980 克重的镁合金超极本,令人印象深刻的 OLED 面板
![](fileadmin/_processed_/8/9/csm_AKA00461_f7a4053f5e.jpg)
华为 MateBook X Pro 的 2022 和 2023 型号属于用钱能买到的最好的 14 英寸超极本。随着新款 2024 版本的发布,该制造商的目标是将标准定得更高,将更轻薄的镁合金外壳与柔性 OLED 面板(仍为 3,120 x 2,080 像素,纵横比为 3:2)相结合,从而使重量比上一代产品减少了近 300 克。这款笔记本电脑的新型 OLED 触摸屏的最大 HDR 亮度应该超过 1,000 cd/m²,并覆盖 AdobeRGB 色彩空间。我们想知道,其轻薄的结构是否真的带来了更好的整体包装,或者是否因为重量更轻而需要做出太多妥协。
我们测试的新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 是高端机型,配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H、32 GB LPDDR5x 6400 内存、2 TB 固态硬盘以及上述 OLED 触摸屏面板,当前售价约为 2,600 美元。其入门价格(酷睿至尊 7 155H、16 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘)目前略高于 2,200 美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89 % | 06/2024 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | 980 g | 13.5 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 | |
87.4 % | 04/2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.7 % | 02/2024 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90 % | 08/2023 | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 987 g | 16.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90.8 % | 02/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.1 kg | 14.96 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.6 % | 06/2023 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 | |
88.6 % | 05/2024 | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 浅蓝色镁合金
与 2023 年推出的前代产品相比,新款 MateBook X Pro 采用了更纤薄、更轻巧的外壳。 的前代产品相比相比,新机型的重量仅为 980 克。一拿起笔记本电脑,你就会发现它非常轻巧。即便如此,它的质量依然很好,并继续使用镁合金。磨砂表面手感舒适,不会留下太多指纹痕迹。它的每一面边框都很窄,屏占比高达 87%。
我们的高端机型采用了新的莫兰迪蓝配色,与旧机型相比,蓝色调更浅。而基本款则为黑色,你也可以选择带有黑色键盘的白色款。
它的制造质量很好,但由于重量较轻,在稳定性方面需要做出一些妥协。尤其是中间的键盘区域会有明显的凹陷,从而导致一些细微的吱吱声。此外,机箱底盖非常薄,中间缺少一个固定夹。在这个区域,有一些空气,你可以从笔记本电脑中听到一些嘎吱嘎吱的声音。尽管如此,这在日常使用中应该不会造成任何问题。
显示屏的盖子也非常薄,而且相当容易弯曲。当试图扭动它时,我们注意到一些听起来像胶水脱落的声音。不过,由于显示屏采用的是 OLED 面板,这并没有导致任何图像错误。铰链很平滑,单手就能轻松打开笔记本电脑,但在调整打开角度(最大 135 度)或进行更剧烈的运动时,屏幕会有轻微的晃动。在操作触摸屏时也会出现这种情况。
如前所述,新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 的重量仅为 980 克,非常轻巧,甚至低于 LG Gram Style 14。 LG Gram Style 14的 987 克还要低,而 LG 的机身厚度也要稍厚一些。其最大的竞争对手三星 Galaxy Book4 Pro 14重约 250 克,但其厚度更薄,结构更稳定。尽管 MateBook X Pro 采用 14.2 英寸面板,但它的体积却相当小巧。附带的 90 瓦电源包括 USB-C 线缆总重 236 克。
连接性 - 华为取消了耳机插孔
与上一代产品相比,新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 的接口更少了。侧面的两个 USB-C 接口少了一个,3.5 毫米音频接口也被完全取消。这款笔记本电脑的供货范围至少包括一个简单的 USB-C 入耳式耳机。在设备的左侧,仍然有两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口,你仍然可以选择在两侧为 MateBook X Pro 2024 充电。此外,右侧还有一个网络摄像头快门开关。此外,MateBook 还可以使用熟悉的超级设备功能与其他华为设备轻松通信,例如交换数据。
交流
华为继续使用著名的英特尔 AX211 模块,支持 6 GHz(Wi-Fi 6E)和蓝牙 5.3,但尚未提供 Wi-Fi 7。在我们使用华硕参考路由器进行的标准化 WLAN 测试中,其传输速率约为 1.7 Gbit/s,在同类产品中属于最快、最稳定的。在日常使用中,我们也从未遇到过任何连接问题。
Networking | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
网络摄像头
总的来说,MateBook 的 1080p 网络摄像头没有任何变化,除了华为熟悉的 AI 功能外,它现在还支持 Windows 的工作室特效(柔焦、自动居中等)。华为软件还提供其他功能(虚拟背景、美颜滤镜)。网络摄像头本身的质量也不错。
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/c/c/csm_colorchecker_passport_267c8e9cfc.jpg)
维护
输入设备 - MateBook X Pro 仍配备出色的键盘
新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 的纤薄机身对其键盘没有任何影响,因为它的键程仍然是 1.5 毫米,与 2023 机型直接对比,我们注意到在键盘上打字的感觉没有任何区别。得益于其较大的键程和精准的按键,用户仍能获得笔记本电脑领域最好的键盘体验之一。从舒适度的角度来看,它可以轻松与最新的 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12.键盘布局合理,只是垂直方向键有点偏小。电源键位于键盘本身外侧的右上方,指纹传感器也位于该键内。键盘采用两级白色背光,遗憾的是仍无法自动激活。
华为也没有改变笔记本电脑的触觉触摸板。点击时的反馈是由振动电机产生的,因此无论你在哪里点击,都能获得相同的反馈,而且产生的噪音非常小,感觉质量很高。边缘上还有更多手势,名为 FreeTouch。例如,可以在右侧边缘调节音量,并支持网格效果(例如,亮度在左侧,视频时间轴在顶部)。当然,电容式触摸屏还可用于输入,操作起来也没有任何问题。
显示屏 - 柔性 OLED,亮度超过 1,200 尼特
华为在新款 2024 MateBook X Pro 上将 IPS 面板换成了 OLED 显示屏,但其技术规格仍保持不变。14.2 英寸屏幕的纵横比仍为 3:2,分辨率为 3,120 x 2,080 像素。相比之下,其刷新率提高到了 120 Hz。主观而言,它的画质令人印象深刻,内容描绘清晰锐利,色彩看起来超级鲜艳。与三星最新的有机发光二极管一样,尽管是触摸屏,但在描绘光线区域时不会出现光栅效应问题。
另一方面,华为的柔性 OLED 面板在亮度方面明显有别于三星的竞争产品--在标准 SDR 工作模式下,新款 MateBook X Pro 的平均亮度已达到 624 cd/m²(三星目前为 400 cd/m²)。在 HDR 工作模式下,差异就更大了,因为在显示图像摘录时,我们注意到最高亮度达到了 1,220 cd/m²。在显示几乎全白的画面时,我们测得的亮度为 911 cd/m²,这仍然是非常好的(三星:最大亮度约为 640 cd/m²)。这些数值令人震惊,目前在 OLED 笔记本电脑中是无与伦比的。OLED 面板没有任何背光渗色问题,响应速度也超快。此外,它还能通过传感器自动调节亮度和色温。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 613 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.99, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
94.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 VisN236HUZ15, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.20 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA ATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Samsung SDC417F ATNA40YK10-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Samsung ATNA40YK20-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.20 | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -4% | 1% | 0% | 1% | -7% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 97 -3% | 99.8 0% | 99.92 0% | 99.7 0% | 89.8 -10% | 98.6 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.4 -1% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94.6 | 85.2 -10% | 97.6 3% | 94.71 0% | 98.2 4% | 84.2 -11% | 87.3 -8% |
Response Times | -45% | -35% | -184% | -53% | 2279% | -96% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.75 ? | 0.83 ? -11% | 0.69 ? 8% | 2 ? -167% | 0.91 ? -21% | 20 ? -2567% | 1.31 ? -75% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.49 ? | 0.69 ? -41% | 0.71 ? -45% | 2 ? -308% | 0.76 ? -55% | 7 ? -1329% | 1.2 ? -145% |
PWM Frequency | 1440 | 240 ? -83% | 480 ? -67% | 350 -76% | 240.3 -83% | 156000 ? 10733% | 480 ? -67% |
Screen | -8% | 6% | -36% | 7% | -23% | 6% | |
Brightness middle | 613 | 392 -36% | 391 -36% | 384 -37% | 417 -32% | 595 -3% | 387 -37% |
Brightness | 624 | 398 -36% | 392 -37% | 388 -38% | 417 -33% | 550 -12% | 386 -38% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 97 4% | 98 5% | 97 4% | 98 5% | 85 -9% | 98 5% |
Black Level * | 0.02 | 0.054 | 0.25 | 0.01 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.3 32% | 1.1 42% | 2.47 -30% | 1.26 34% | 2.01 -6% | 1 47% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.1 | 3.2 -3% | 2.4 23% | 4.33 -40% | 3.6 -16% | 6.9 -123% | 2.4 23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.5 | 2.81 -87% | 0.68 55% | 1.22 19% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 2.3 -10% | 1.3 38% | 2.63 -25% | 1.3 38% | 2.74 -30% | 1.4 33% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.18 101% | 2.27 97% | 2.4 92% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 6447 101% | 6517 100% | 6336 103% | 6279 104% | 6355 102% | 6319 103% | 6466 101% |
Contrast | 19550 | 7111 | 2380 | 38700 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -19% /
-16% | -9% /
-6% | -73% /
-62% | -15% /
-8% | 750% /
512% | -31% /
-22% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2)对面板进行了分析,同时查看了所有不同的色彩配置文件。这对用户来说有点麻烦,因为标准配置是激活本地配置文件(P3),而您必须使用快捷键激活专业模式,该模式会激活摄影色彩配置文件(P3-65)。不过,在测试过程中,专业模式的效果较差,因此我们再次将其停用。其他配置文件可通过显示管理器获得,该管理器仅显示在 Windows 的第二个右键菜单中(右键单击桌面 -> 显示更多选项 -> 显示管理器)。根据华为的说法,所有设备都经过预校准,DeltaE-200 的平均偏差小于 1,但我们无法证实这一点。
Native 配置文件提供了一个良好的基础,没有色调或明显的色温偏差。其平均色彩偏差为 1.9,非常不错,只有个别颜色超过了 3 的重要临界值,偏差达到 3.1。如果使用 sRGB 和 AdobeRGB 配置文件,情况会更糟,因为偏差会更大。此外,AdobeRGB 色彩空间并没有完全覆盖。由于偏差较大,这意味着该面板不是编辑照片/视频的理想选择。
通过我们自己的校准(可在上面免费下载配置文件),与 P3 参考机型相比,我们能够在灰度和色彩方面略微改善显示效果。不过,在日常使用中还是没有必要这样做。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.25 ms rise | |
↘ 0.24 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise | |
↘ 0.35 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1440 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 1440 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 1440 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17655 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 配备 Meteor Lake H 处理器的 MateBook X Pro
新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 采用英特尔的 Meteor Lake 移动处理器,提供酷睿至尊 7 155H 和 16GB 内存,或酷睿至尊 9 185H 和 32GB 内存(LPDDR5x-6400)。不提供 64 GB 内存或更快的内存选项。
测试条件
华为为 MateBook X Pro 2024 提供两种不同的性能配置文件:平衡型和性能型。我们在下表中总结了它们各自的性能和排放值。默认情况下,MateBook 始终在 "性能"模式下启动,这也是我们在以下基准测试和测量中使用该模式的原因。原则上,平衡模式当然也能满足日常使用的需要,但总是需要手动切换到该模式,而且笔记本电脑不会自己记住设置,这一点非常恼人。
能源概况 | CPU TDP | Cinebench R23 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | 最大风扇噪音排放 |
---|---|---|---|---|
平衡 | 80 -> 36 瓦 | 13,199 分 | 3,280 分 | 39.9 分贝(A) |
性能 | 80 -> 45 瓦 | 15,270 分 | 3,719 分 | 46.8 分贝(A) |
处理器 - Core Ultra 9 185H
MateBook X Pro 2024 的顶级型号采用了最新的 酷睿至尊 9 185H处理器。这是目前流星湖系列中速度最快的移动处理器,最高主频为 5.1 GHz。在 MateBook 内,该处理器短时间内的最大功耗为 80 瓦,之后在长期负载情况下,功耗会平衡在 45 瓦。鉴于其轻巧纤薄的机身,这些高功耗限制带来了相应的高性能值,测试设备也因此领先于竞争对手。虽然无法长时间保持高性能,但笔记本电脑的连续多核性能(-30%)还是很有竞争力的,与对比设备相比,总体上更好、更稳定。至少与其他英特尔竞争对手相比是这样,因为 华硕 Zenbook 14配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS华硕 Zenbook 14 采用 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS,在 30 瓦的功耗下比酷睿 Ultra 9 在 45 瓦的功耗下获得了更好的性能。这充分说明英特尔芯片相比之下是多么低效。新的 Lunar Lake 芯片可能会在这方面有所帮助,但首批设备上市还需要几个月的时间,而 AMD 的 Zen5 芯片已经在研发之中。
在电池模式下,它的性能并没有降低,进一步的 CPU 基准测试可参见 这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 -2! | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (12688 - 19851, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 16201, n=67, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1620 - 1906, n=8) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 1934, n=67, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4843 - 7651, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (622 - 735, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1582 - 3165, n=10) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2694, n=70, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (238 - 280, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (149.7 - 280, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (163 - 285, n=8) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (52522 - 76331, n=8) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16223 - 67444, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3873 - 6403, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4502 - 5781, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (12825 - 14160, n=8) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6796 - 13756, n=35, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2003 - 3130, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2199 - 2570, n=8) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (10441 - 14230, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4274 - 12822, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1700 - 1902, n=8) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1348 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (14.1 - 22.7, n=8) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1.5 - 19.4, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 115.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (38.5 - 49.5, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.4397 - 1.011, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (0.4457 - 0.503, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 25961, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11867 - 111109, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (453 - 4646, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=8) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15447 - 115300, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1223 - 14944, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6379 - 59053, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=8) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (270 - 1123, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (204 - 14018, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (45560 - 53918, n=8) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7622 - 53954, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
系统性能
在合成系统基准测试中,新款 MateBook X Pro 的表现同样出色,经常大大领先于竞争对手。平心而论,你不得不承认,所有现代笔记本电脑在日常使用中都非常快,你不会真正注意到各个对比设备之间的真正差异。在测试过程中,MateBook 对输入的响应速度非常快,而且我们没有发现任何系统稳定性问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (6771 - 7510, n=3) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4384 - 7428, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (10781 - 11331, n=3) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8890 - 11331, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8888 - 10484, n=3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6213 - 10449, n=56, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8793 - 10353, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4093 - 10353, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1675 - 1971, n=3) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1971, n=62, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1589 - 1875, n=3) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1875, n=62, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1883 - 2102, n=3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=62, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1329 - 1889, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128.3 - 448, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (264 - 293, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (251 - 267, n=3) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (67.2 - 325, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1913, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (508 - 532, n=3) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7403 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (71990 - 95718, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 96791, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (75449 - 87768, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 86433, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (70596 - 93871, n=8) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 107658, n=59, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (129.6 - 146.1, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.8 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的高端测试设备配备了 2 TB 版本的 WD SN740。这款 M.2 2280 固态硬盘通过 PCIe 4.0 连接,传输速率超过 5 GB/s。此外,即使在长时间负载的情况下,其性能也能保持完全稳定。 这对于快速固态硬盘来说并不总是必然的。一个令人困惑的主要问题仍然是制造商对固态硬盘的分区,因为在首次启动设备后,系统硬盘上只有 145 GB 是空闲的。因此,如果你在安装和下载时不小心,很快就会收到硬盘已满的提示。这根本不切实际,也没有必要。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡 - Intel Arc Graphics
Core Ultra 9 185H 配备了快速版的新英特尔 Arc Graphics,它拥有 8 个 Xe 内核,最高主频可达 2.35 GHz。与旧版 Iris Xe Graphics G7 相比,英特尔大幅提升了其性能,这就是为什么新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 在 GPU 测试中提供的功率几乎是 2023 型号的两倍。 2023 型号的两倍。此外,这是迄今为止我们测试过的最快的 Arc iGPU 之一。AMD 的 Radeon 780M在合成测试中也明显落于下风。
在过去的几个月中,英特尔一直在为其新的 Arc iGPU 不断发布驱动程序更新,这款机型的游戏性能也得益于此。事实上,在实际游戏测试中,MateBook X Pro 2024 将Zenbook 14 的 Radeon 780M 甩在了身后,但在合成测试中,它的领先优势要小得多,两款机型的表现几乎一样。在游戏测试中,新的 Arc iGPU 比 MateBook X Pro 2023 内的旧版 Iris Xe 图形处理器 "只 "高出约 50%。
在Time Spy 压力测试(99.3%)和Witcher 3 循环测试中,MateBook X Pro 2024 的 GPU 性能保持完全稳定。此外,在电池模式下,其性能也没有降低。更多 GPU 基准测试,请访问技术版块。
3DMark 11 Performance | 13398 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8516 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4088 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (336 - 1548, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (294 - 637, n=25) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8 - 44.2, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.61 - 67.5, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 158.8 | 148.1 | 48.9 | 19.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 158 | 97 | 57 | 25.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 105 | 99.9 | 80.6 | 80.9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 80.1 | 43.4 | 30.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 66.6 | 51.9 | 43.9 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 69 | 47 | 43 | 41 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 188 | 82 | 69 | 56 |
F1 23 (2023) | 89.3 | 79.8 | 54.5 | 15 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 36.4 | 30.2 | 27.6 | 24.7 |
排放物 - 冷却装置略微过载
噪音排放
根据华为的说法,它的散热得到了改进,正如我们已经看到的那样,对于如此轻薄的设备来说,它的功率限制是非常高的。不过,在日常使用中(无论使用哪种能源模式)并不会保持非常安静,即使在空闲模式下,风扇也会经常运转。在执行简单任务时,噪音就已达到 34 dB(A)左右。这个噪音相当高,很快就会让人厌烦。此外,两种能量曲线的表现几乎完全相同,在我们的压力测试中,性能模式的噪音甚至比平衡模式更大(46.8 对 39.9 分贝(A))。在这里,更好的分级是有意义的。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.8 / 29.8 / 29.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 34 / 46.8 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 10% | 9% | 6% | 11% | 0% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 24.8 | 24.5 1% | 23.4 6% | 25 -1% | 23.8 4% | 25.4 -2% | 25.1 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.8 | 24.5 1% | 23.4 6% | 25 -1% | 24 3% | 25.4 -2% | 25.1 -1% |
Idle Average * | 29.8 | 24.5 18% | 23.4 21% | 25 16% | 24 19% | 25.4 15% | 25.1 16% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.8 | 24.5 18% | 24.5 18% | 25 16% | 24 19% | 29.6 1% | 25.1 16% |
Load Average * | 34 | 32.4 5% | 39.3 -16% | 37 -9% | 31.5 7% | 42 -24% | 35.9 -6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.9 | 36.7 8% | 35.9 10% | 37 7% | 37.8 5% | 39.3 2% | |
Load Maximum * | 46.8 | 36.7 22% | 39.3 16% | 40.62 13% | 37.8 19% | 40.9 13% | 42.2 10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
当笔记本电脑空转和日常使用时,处理器周围的区域已经明显发热,将笔记本电脑放在大腿上时也能明显感觉到。不过,这通常不会造成任何限制,而且新机型的性能实际上比旧机型略胜一筹 MateBook X Pro 2023.当设备处于负载状态时也是如此,我们在底部测得的最高温度略低于 43 °C。我们在键盘中间区域测得的 43 °C温度让人感觉不那么舒适;虽然仍然可以打字,但在这种极端情况下,手指会变得非常热。另一个问题是 90 瓦的电源装置,在负载情况下(游戏时和压力测试时)温度高达 60-65 °C,实在太高了。
在 CPU/GPU 合并负载的压力测试中,我们最初测得处理器的负载为 80 瓦,随后处理器的负载立即降至 40 瓦。在平衡模式下,我们也在短时间内测得了 80 瓦的功率,但随后功率下降,几分钟后稳定在 25 瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.1 °C / 1.9 F).
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 7% | 7% | 9% | -1% | -11% | 1% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43.2 | 41 5% | 40.9 5% | 36.3 16% | 44.2 -2% | 46.5 -8% | 43.1 -0% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 44.2 -5% | 46.8 -11% | 36.8 12% | 41.2 2% | 44.7 -6% | 50.2 -20% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.3 | 25.3 14% | 24.1 18% | 29.2 -0% | 29.4 -0% | 34.9 -19% | 25.8 12% |
Idle Bottom * | 29.7 | 26.2 12% | 24.6 17% | 27.4 8% | 31.2 -5% | 32.9 -11% | 26.4 11% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
MateBook X Pro 2024 的音响系统由六个扬声器组成,与旧款 MateBook X Pro 2023 相比,华为在音质方面有所改进。它的声音洪亮而充沛--只是由于笔记本的设计,低音略显不足。即便如此,这也是其他笔记本电脑存在的问题,目前我们的数据库中还没有更好的音响系统。
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 显示屏太亮会耗尽电池
耗电量
功耗主要由 OLED 面板决定,我们在最大 SDR 亮度下的空闲模式下测得的最大功耗为 16.4 瓦,明显高于大多数同类设备,是采用 IPS 面板的前代产品的两倍多。在这种情况下,你只需为如此高的亮度付出代价,在 HDR 模式下,面板的功耗甚至更高。在负载情况下,设备需要的最大功率为 94 瓦,因此设备会短暂达到电源装置的极限。在接下来的压力测试过程中,耗电量稳定在 75 瓦左右。因此,我们可以说 90 瓦的供电装置总体上太弱了。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.20 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 3120x2080, 14.20 | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 40% | 32% | 43% | 35% | 32% | 46% | 30% | 38% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9.3 | 5.7 39% | 6.1 34% | 3.58 62% | 3.9 58% | 4.1 56% | 3.6 61% | 5.14 ? 45% | 4.85 ? 48% |
Idle Average * | 16 | 8.7 46% | 10 37% | 7.125 55% | 5.8 64% | 6.6 59% | 6.6 59% | 8.4 ? 47% | 8.31 ? 48% |
Idle Maximum * | 16.4 | 8.9 46% | 10.3 37% | 12.1 26% | 16 2% | 8 51% | 7.4 55% | 12.3 ? 25% | 10.4 ? 37% |
Load Average * | 67.3 | 44.5 34% | 53.3 21% | 40.67 40% | 46.1 32% | 61 9% | 47.1 30% | 52.8 ? 22% | 46.8 ? 30% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 64.6 | 36.9 43% | 42 35% | 50.4 22% | 56 13% | 47.4 27% | |||
Load Maximum * | 94.3 | 65.2 31% | 67 29% | 64.2 32% | 67.4 29% | 90 5% | 54.3 42% | 82.4 ? 13% | 67.5 ? 28% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
华为将新机型的电池容量从 60 Wh 提高到了 70 Wh,但即便如此,其 WLAN 运行时间还是略有缩短。在 150 cd/m²(相当于测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 58%)的 WLAN 测试中,MateBook 的续航时间为 8 分 19 秒。这比旧款少了 80 分钟,但比Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 多了 40 分钟。在全亮度的 WLAN 测试中,我们只用了大约 5 个小时,但你不应该忘记 MateBook 的亮度有多高。Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 能多用 1 小时,但它的显示屏比 MateBook 暗 200 多 cd/m²。当以 150 cd/m² 的亮度播放视频内容时,我们测得了约 12.5 小时的好成绩,而在全亮度条件下播放 HDR 视频仅用了 4.5 小时。
在负载情况下,笔记本电脑在最差情况下 70 分钟后就会关闭,而在设备打开的情况下,充满一次电需要 93 分钟。在我们的测试中,启动快速充电模式并没有进一步缩短充电时间。
请注意:与 Galaxy Book4 Pro 14一样,MateBook X Pro 2024 的活动信号模式仍为 120 赫兹,即使我们将频率降至 60 赫兹。
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 63 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 57 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 21% | 56% | 42% | -4% | 21% | 56% | 34% | |
H.264 | 756 | 917 21% | 1010 34% | 603 -20% | 527 -30% | 1046 38% | 817 ? 8% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 499 | 458 -8% | 707 42% | 700 40% | 466 -7% | 580 16% | 774 55% | 641 ? 28% |
Load | 70 | 104 49% | 134 91% | 145 107% | 70 0% | 124 77% | 123 76% | 116.9 ? 67% |
Pros
Cons
评语:2024 MateBook X Pro 的显示屏和重量令人印象深刻,但需要做出妥协
初次见到新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 时,其轻巧的机身和出色的触感立刻让人眼前一亮。此外,它的 OLED 触摸屏拥有出色的画质,而且输入设备和扬声器也是移动领域中最好的。不过,与 2023 机型相比,其轻薄的机身确实有一些妥协。但首先要说明的是。
除了重量轻之外,用户体验的主要特点是笔记本电脑采用了全新的 OLED 显示屏,与三星的竞争对手相比,它具有出色的画质和更高的亮度值。超过 600 尼特的 SDR 亮度加上低反射水平,使 MateBook 可以在户外轻松使用。由于刷新率高,PWM 闪烁对大多数用户来说都不是问题。另一方面,随机提供的 sRGB 和 AdobeRGB 色彩配置文件并不是最准确的,这意味着该设备并不适合图像编辑。
机箱本身的稳定性有所下降,而且其显示屏盖子特别灵活--这可能会导致一些令人不快的噪音。中间的键盘区域也会被轻微压入,但在每次使用时,这都不会成为问题。说到连接选项,3.5 毫米插孔的缺失尤其令人遗憾,但反过来,输入设备的不变也是一个积极因素。它的键盘输入手感极佳,可以轻松与最好的商务笔记本电脑相媲美。不过,令人遗憾的是,华为仍然让用户很难买到组件。
新款华为 MateBook X Pro 2024 的低重量、出色的画质和高亮度 OLED 触摸屏给人留下了深刻印象。酷睿至尊 9 185H 的性能同样令人印象深刻,但其代价是风扇活动频繁--即使在执行简单任务时也是如此。
现在来谈谈这款笔记本电脑的性能,这是一把双刃剑。总体而言,酷睿至尊 9 185H 的性能非常出色,功耗限制也很高。同时,这也是英特尔最新 CPU 的最大问题,因为大功率需要大量电力。反过来,这也反映在该设备的风扇活动几乎是持续不断的,即使是在执行日常任务时也会明显发热。此外,它的电源太弱,在负载情况下也会发热。遗憾的是,它的高效模式几乎无法改善风扇活动,我们希望看到一个性能水平降低的静音模式。总而言之,MateBook X Pro 只需要一个更高效的处理器,但英特尔(目前)还没有合适的处理器。对于 MateBook X Pro 来说,25 瓦的 AMD Zen4 或 Zen5 处理器将是理想的散热选择,同时还能让它在性能方面与其他产品竞争。
它的电池续航能力一般,当然这主要取决于屏幕亮度。如果你要求设备在室外一直保持全亮度(与其他笔记本电脑相比,这样才能舒适地工作),那么如果你发现它的续航时间缩短了,也不必感到惊讶。
MateBook X Pro 2024 最大的竞争对手是 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 14但它的 OLED 屏幕更暗、反光更强。更重的Galaxy Book4 的外壳稳定性更好,而 MateBook 的输入设备更好,性能也更强。LG Style 14 LG Style 14重量也不到 1 千克,几乎可以被动运行,但它的 OLED 显示屏较暗,输入设备较弱。
价格和供应情况
新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 可在一系列在线零售商处购买,价格从美元 2,224.30 起。.
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024
-
06/05/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.