Apple iMac 24 M1 2021年的回顾。Apple'M1 SoC在台式机中也有说服力吗?
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 M1, M1 8-Core GPU | 4.4 kg | 461 mm | 23.50" | 4480x2520 | |
86.4 % v7 (old) | Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 i9-10910, Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) | 8.9 kg | 203 mm | 27.00" | 5120x2880 | ||
86.8 % v6 (old) | Apple iMac Pro W-2145, Pro Vega 56 | 9.8 kg | 516 mm | 27.00" | 5120x2880 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳、设备和输入装置
iMac的外壳与它的前任不同 前辈的不同之处.现在外壳的厚度在所有地方都是一样的(以前是很鼓的),但在显示屏下面使用塑料意味着这款一体机看起来不再那么高质量。下边框的宽度看起来也不是特别现代;这里肯定会有更多的东西。然而,制造质量仍然很好,没有理由提出批评。内置的支架不允许调整高度,只有倾斜角度可以稍微调整。iMac也有集成VESA适配器的版本(~50欧元/~58美元的附加费),但没有包含支架,也不能加装。我们的测试设备采用黄色,看起来非常好,尽管每种口味都应该在这里找到合适的颜色。
拥有7个GPU核心的基本型号只在背面提供两个USB-C端口(USB-4/Thunderbolt 3,40GBit/s)。那些选择带有8个GPU核心的配置的用户可以得到两个更多的USB-C端口(3.2 Gen.2),以及作为标准的电源上的千兆以太网插头。Wi-Fi 6和蓝牙5.0也包括在内,尽管WLAN性能(与M1 MacBooks的性能一样)。 M1 MacBooks)有点低(Wi-Fi 6只有80MHz)。然而,在测试中,信号质量非常好。
iMac的这些端口非常灵活,但是当你想快速连接外部硬盘或U盘时,这个位置在实践中不是很实用。我们希望能在侧面看到一个额外的USB接口,类似于左侧边缘的插孔。因此,你很难绕过一个USB集线器。
我们已经知道前辈们的输入设备,特别是TrackPad工作得非常好。由于集成了Touch ID,键盘非常实用,但它只为桌面输入提供很少的行程(与MacBooks相当),而且也没有照明。如果你想写很多东西,你肯定会得到更好的替代品,但它们不能提供所有的舒适功能。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (405 - 1750, n=103) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Apple iMac Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (284 - 1414, n=103) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple iMac Pro | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 |
显示器 - 配备4.5K视网膜屏幕的iMac
23.5英寸显示屏提供了非常高的分辨率,即4480 x 2,520像素,像素密度为218 PPI。因此,显示的内容非常清晰,与macOS结合使用也没有缩放问题。IPS面板的主观画面印象非常好,像True Tone(根据环境自动调整色温)以及亮度传感器都非常实用,它们也能完美地工作。
Apple 表示亮度为500尼特,但根据我们的分析(CalMAN Professional和X-Rite i1 Pro 2),我们只能在显示器的中心确认这一点。平均亮度约为480cd/m²。与之前的 iMacs,Apple ,能够减少黑值,这就是为什么对比度(>1,400:1)也更好。我们没有注意到PWM的闪烁,对于IPS显示器来说,响应时间相对较好(没有重影)。
|
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Contrast: 1414:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 IPS, 4480x2520, 23.5" | Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 APPAE32, IPS, 5120x2880, 27" | Apple iMac Pro APPAE1E, , 5120x2880, 27" | |
---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.7 | 98.7 1% | 99 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.6 | 89.5 3% | 88.8 3% |
Response Times | 19% | -6% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29.2 ? | 27.2 ? 7% | 30.4 ? -4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 17.6 ? | 12.4 ? 30% | 18.8 ? -7% |
PWM Frequency | 22730 ? | 208.3 ? | |
Screen | -18% | -71% | |
Brightness middle | 523 | 529 1% | 496 -5% |
Brightness | 479 | 511 7% | 468 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 88 7% | 87 6% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.48 -30% | 0.54 -46% |
Contrast | 1414 | 1102 -22% | 919 -35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.4 -27% | 3 -173% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2 | 2.6 -30% | 5.8 -190% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.4 | 0.9 -125% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 2.2 -47% | 2.5 -67% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.32 95% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6729 97% | 6826 95% | 6824 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 80 | 79.4 | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
-8% | -25% /
-46% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏几乎完全覆盖了P3色彩空间,而且面板在出厂状态下已经被校准得非常好。灰度中没有偏色,所有的颜色偏差都低于3的重要标志。我们仍然可以通过校准来最小限度地改善显示器,但你只能从测量值中看到这一点。因此,新的iMac 24适合无限制地编辑图片/视频。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise | |
↘ 13.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
IPS屏幕的可视角度稳定性非常好。然而,由于光泽的表面,你不应该把iMac 24放在窗户对面,否则你可能会有反射的问题。在全亮度和黑暗的背景下,你也可以看到清晰的光晕。在这方面,以前的iMac要好一些。
性能和排放
该Apple M1 SoC我们已经从 MacBook Air, MacBook Pro 13和 Mac Mini.带8个GPU核心的iMac使用了两个风扇(带7个GPU核心的型号只有一个风扇),这就是性能稳定的原因。其结果与Mac Mini以及MacBook Pro 13持平。在实践中,iMac 24是一个反应极为迅速的系统,但旧的 英特尔型号提供更多的性能,特别是在多核测试中。
该系统只在有限的程度上适用于游戏,因为支持的作品不多。然而,由于ARM的基础,你可以访问Apple'的街机系列,你可以从 苹果手机和 iPads.我们也非常喜欢6个扬声器,可以轻松取代廉价的外部扬声器。Apple 巧妙地利用了机箱内的空间,内置模块对大多数用户来说完全足够。
我们对大声的冷却感到惊讶。在日常使用中(浏览、视频),系统几乎都是静音的,甚至纯GPU负载也几乎听不到,但在CPU高负载下,两个风扇很快就达到了40dB(A)以上,无论是在原生还是模拟应用中。我们甚至可以测到最高46 dB(A)。当与 Mac Mini相比,新的iMac 24在相同的性能下几乎听不到声音,而在负载下,新的iMac 24的声音就变得太大。
附带的143瓦电源完全够用,而且仍有足够的储备用于Thunderbolt或USB-C配件,因为即使在全亮度的压力测试中,我们也能测出最大约79瓦的能量。
Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Desktop | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 -2! | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Average Apple M1 | |
Apple iMac Pro -6! | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) -1! | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Desktop (277 - 42705, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Average Apple M1 (7409 - 7830, n=6) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Desktop (1662 - 2353, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Average Apple M1 (1496 - 1520, n=6) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Desktop (4085 - 16722, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Average Apple M1 (1863 - 2109, n=4) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Desktop (451 - 902, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Average Apple M1 (401 - 406, n=4) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Desktop (2005 - 6588, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple iMac Pro | |
Apple iMac Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Average Apple M1 (1020 - 1087, n=4) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Desktop (233 - 356, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Average Apple M1 (206 - 208, n=3) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple iMac Pro |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Desktop (11095 - 26186, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Average Apple M1 (7034 - 7710, n=9) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Desktop (1967 - 2559, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Average Apple M1 (1710 - 1745, n=9) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M |
WebXPRT 3: Overall
Octane V2: Total Score
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Speedometer 2.0: Result
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test: 5GB Read | 5GB Write
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (175.4 - 184.3, n=6) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Desktop (339 - 409, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (216 - 293, n=6) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M |
Octane V2 / Total Score | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (62055 - 66974, n=6) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple iMac Pro |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple iMac Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (446 - 516, n=6) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Average of class Desktop (377 - 575, n=14, last 2 years) |
Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (209 - 255, n=6) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 |
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test / 5GB Read | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (2728 - 2870, n=4) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M |
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test / 5GB Write | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (2194 - 2895, n=4) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) |
* ... smaller is better
GFXBench | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Average Apple M1 8-Core GPU (60.9 - 81.7, n=8) | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Average Apple M1 8-Core GPU (149 - 216, n=8) |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 100 | 33 | 20 | 15 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 54 | 33 | 20 |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0512 | Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), i9-10910, Apple SSD AP1024 | Apple iMac Pro Pro Vega 56, W-2145 | Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -21% | -25% | -17% | ||
off / environment * | 24.2 | 29.1 -20% | 29.1 -20% | 29.2 -21% | |
Idle Minimum * | 24.2 | 29.7 -23% | 29.8 -23% | 29.2 -21% | |
Idle Average * | 24.2 | 29.7 -23% | 29.8 -23% | 29.2 -21% | |
Idle Maximum * | 24.2 | 29.7 -23% | 29.8 -23% | 29.2 -21% | |
Load Average * | 25 | 35 -40% | 39.7 -59% | 32.1 -28% | |
Load Maximum * | 46 | 43.6 5% | 47.9 -4% | 41.9 9% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35 |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.2 / 24.2 / 24.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 25 / 46 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 25 to 47 °C for the class Desktop.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.7 °C / 85 F.
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 46%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 46%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.13 / 0.9 Watt |
Idle | 9.7 / 42.3 / 42.6 Watt |
Load |
59.2 / 78.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021 M1, M1 8-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 4480x2520, 23.5" | Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 i9-10910, Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), Apple SSD AP1024, IPS, 5120x2880, 27" | Apple iMac Pro W-2145, Pro Vega 56, , , 5120x2880, 27" | Average Apple M1 8-Core GPU | Average of class Desktop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -189% | -265% | 64% | -202% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9.7 | 27.6 -185% | 49.5 -410% | 3.34 ? 66% | 42.9 ? -342% |
Idle Average * | 42.3 | 64.7 -53% | 86.7 -105% | 14.6 ? 65% | 80.1 ? -89% |
Idle Maximum * | 42.6 | 65.3 -53% | 88.9 -109% | 13.3 ? 69% | 53 ? -24% |
Load Average * | 59.2 | 162 -174% | 150.1 -154% | 23 ? 61% | 111.9 ? -89% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 59.2 | 247 -317% | |||
Load Maximum * | 78.7 | 354 -350% | 508.5 -546% | 33.2 ? 58% | 445 ? -465% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption Unigine Valley / Stress test
Pros
Cons
评语--iMac变得太吵了
新款iMac 24 M1取代了之前的iMac 21.5,主要适用于使用M1处理器的日常任务。在这里,一体机也可以用静音操作来说服人,但在CPU高负荷工作时(如视频编辑),iMac会变得太吵,特别是与Mac Mini M1相比。较大的 iMac 27仍然在产品系列中,并通过英特尔CPU提供更多的性能,还可以配备更多的内存和专用GPU,因此它仍然是要求高的用户的更好(但也更昂贵)的解决方案。
新的23.5英寸IPS显示屏给人留下了非常好的印象,也适用于色彩准确的图片或视频编辑。用户体验得到了改善,特别是由于True Tone或敏感的亮度传感器等功能。新的扬声器系统也很有说服力,可以轻松取代许多廉价的外部扬声器。
Apple iMac 24 M1是一台适合日常使用的一体式电脑,你会在屏幕和扬声器上获得很多乐趣。然而,iMac在负载下会明显变得太吵,而且也没有维护选项。
除了在CPU高负荷下风扇声音太大之外,同样的缺点仍然存在,我们已经从以前的iMac中知道。背面的端口难以触及,现在根本没有维护选项,而附带的键盘由于键程短和缺乏背光而难以令人信服。此外,在购买之前,你必须决定是要用支架还是VESA支架来使用iMac 24。
价格和可用性
我们的新iMac 24 M1的测试装置在网上商店如Cyberport有售,价格为1,869欧元(~2170美元)可用。最便宜的型号(银色)配备256GB SSD存储和稍慢的7核GPU,也完全可以满足日常使用,起价为 美国亚马逊,价格约为1299美元.
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021
- 10/17/2021 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff