Notebookcheck Logo
Apple iPhone 16 Pro

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 智能手机评测--配备大显示屏的小型 Pro 手机

小强。

如果你想拥有最好的 iPhone,那么你必须选择 Pro 系列,因为只有在这里你才能获得 120 Hz 的显示屏、最快的 SoC 和最好的摄像头。iPhone 16 Pro 恰恰提供了这些,而且还不止这些,因为按照Apple 的标准,新的 Pro 机型已经有了很多改变。它甚至采用了与 iPhone 16 Pro Max 相同的摄像头设置。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Apple 5G iOS iPhone Smartphone Touchscreen

每年 9 月,Apple 都会推出新款 iPhone。与往年一样,新款 iPhone 可能没有重新发明轮子,但肯定不乏创新。

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 秉承了这一传统:其 SoC 是全新的,速度更快;显示屏增至 6.3 英寸;WiFi 7 取代了 WiFi 6E;除了 5 倍光学变焦外,还增加了一个新的相机控制按钮。

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 今年没有调整价格。iPhone 16 Pro 的起价与去年完全相同。存储容量为 128 GB 的最小版本售价为 999 美元,存储容量为 1 TB 的 Pro 版本售价为 1499 美元。

Apple iPhone 16 Pro (iPhone 16 Series)
Processor
Apple A18 Pro 6 x - 4 GHz
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.30 inch 19.5:9, 2622 x 1206 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Super Retina XDR OLED, Always‑On Dis­play, 1600/2000 nits max. brightness (HDR/outdoor), 1 nit min. brightness, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (850/900/1700/1900/2100 MHz), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/30/32/34/38/39/40/41/42/48/53/66), 5G (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/25/26/28/30/38/40/41/48/53/66/70/75/76/77/78/79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.25 x 149.6 x 71.5
Battery
3582 mAh Lithium-Ion, 20 W (with cable), 25W (MagSafe), 7.5W (Qi)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple iOS 18
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix fusion camera (24 mm, f/1.78, OIS), includes 12 MP tele camera (48 mm, f/1.78, 2x optical zoom) + 48 MP ultrawide camera (13 mm, f/2.2, 120° FOV) + 12 MP tele camera (120 mm, f/2.8, 5x optical zoom, 20° FOV, OIS); video recording up to 4k@120fps
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (23 mm, f/1.9, AF), video recording up to 4k@60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), Keyboard: virtual, USB cable, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, Dual-eSIM-Support, fanless, waterproof
Weight
199 g
Price
1200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
87.9 %v8
10 / 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU
199 g128 GB NVMe6.30"2622x1206
90.7 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU
187 g128 GB NVMe6.10"2556x1179
86.3 %v8
10 / 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18, A18 GPU
199 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
90 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy S24
Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940
167 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"2340x1080
89 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Sony Xperia 5 V
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
182 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2520x1080
89.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Xiaomi 14 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
223 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440

表壳 - 钛铝框架,通过 IP68 认证

从外观上看,iPhone 16 Pro 与 iPhone 15 Pro 几乎没有区别。 iPhone 15 Pro.不过,由于采用了 6.3 英寸显示屏,它的长度和宽度分别增加了 3 毫米和 0.9 毫米。它的重量也有所增加,从以前的 187 克增加到了 199 克。与同样小巧的竞争对手相比,如 三星Galaxy S24相比,iPhone 16 Pro 的握持感要重得多,其重量与 6.7 英寸的 iPhone 16 Plus.

新款 Pro 机型的纤薄边框非常适合它,而且与前代产品相比,它的外观更有质感,令人印象深刻。边框仍然采用钛铝合金材质,手机背面采用磨砂玻璃盖板,并带有闪亮的Apple 徽标。

iPhone 16 Pro 通过了 IP68 防尘防水认证,这意味着你可以带着手机潜入 6 米深的淡水中长达 30 分钟。正面采用了名为 Ceramic Shield 的显示屏保护装置,据称比 iPhone 15 Pro 的坚固程度提高了 50%。

去年,iPhone Pro 机型采用了动作按键,而今年,iPhone 16 的所有机型都增加了一个新按键。该按钮用于控制摄像头,位于机身右侧,使用触觉反馈。同时,它也是一个相机快捷键,按下它可以直接进入相机应用。

iPhone 16 Pro 的配色略显保守,只有 iPhone 16 才有亮丽的颜色。除了白色和黑色,Pro 手机还有自然钛色可供选择。我们的测试设备采用的是第四种,也是最后一种配色,名为沙漠钛色,这是一种光滑的古铜色调,遗憾的是,根据光线的不同,有时会显得很苍白。

Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro

尺寸比较

161.4 mm 75.3 mm 8.49 mm 223 g160.9 mm 77.8 mm 7.8 mm 199 g154 mm 68 mm 8.6 mm 182 g149.6 mm 71.5 mm 8.25 mm 199 g146.6 mm 70.6 mm 8.3 mm 187 g147 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - iPhone 16 Pro 的起始存储容量为 128 GB

iPhone 16 Pro 的配件与 iPhone 15 Pro 相同。 iPhone 15 Pro.存储空间再次分为四种,每种仍配备 8 GB 内存:

  • 128 GB 存储空间:999美元
  • 256 GB 存储空间1099 美元
  • 512 GB 存储空间1299 美元
  • 1 TB 存储空间1499 美元

原来,关于 256GB 入门级机型的传言是假的。不过,仅有 128 GB 作为最小存储容量的机型已不完全符合时代潮流,尤其是对于 Pro 机型而言。特别是因为它的存储空间现在可以比以前更快地填满,因为 iPhone 16 Pro 现在可以以每秒 120 帧的速度录制 4K 视频。

iPhone 15 Pro与 iPhone 15 Pro 相同,其 USB-C 端口通过 USB 3.2 Gen 2 速度连接,标称数据吞吐量为 10 GBit/s。有线输入使用 DisplayPort 协议,最高可达 4K,并支持 HDR。

除了蓝牙 5.3 和仅支持读取模式的 NFC 芯片外,Apple ,还在 Pro 机型中安装了第二代超宽带芯片,与 iPhone 15 Pro 中的 UWB 芯片相比,精度更高,范围更大。iPhone 16 Pro 继承了前代产品对 Thread 智能家居无线标准的支持。

在美国,Apple iPhone 16 Pro 仍然只支持 eSIM 卡,不再配备实体 SIM 卡插槽。而在欧洲,新机型仍然可以放置一张 nano SIM 卡。所有版本均支持双 SIM 卡。

左:nano SIM 卡、音量按钮、操作按钮
左:nano SIM 卡、音量按钮、操作按钮
右:待机键、触觉拍照键
右:待机键、触觉拍照键
顶部:无连接
顶部:无连接
底部:扬声器、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2、麦克风
底部:扬声器、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2、麦克风

软件 - iOS 18 暂时没有Apple 智能系统

新的 iOS 18 可在 iPhone 16 Pro 上运行。Apple 官方并未说明其智能手机的更新时间。但经验表明,更新时间大约为 5 年。此外,如果是为了弥补关键的安全漏洞,旧设备仍会收到更新。

iOS 18 还包括许多新的人工智能功能,即Apple 智能。 iPhone 16 Plus. Apple 智能被认为是 iOS 18 的主要功能。在 iPhone 16 系列的发布会上,Apple 还自豪地宣布,其新款 iPhone 专为这些人工智能功能而开发。

实际上,这些营销承诺目前已所剩无几。首批人工智能功能将于 10 月份随 iOS 18.1 一起推出。但是,由于《数字市场法》(DMA)的数据保护规定,Apple Intelligence 还不能在欧盟使用。Apple 打算在与欧盟委员会达成协议后尽快弥补这一点。不过,预计这不会在 2025 年前实现。

Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro

可持续性

据Apple 报道,iPhone 16 Pro 由 25% 的回收材料制成。金、铝和钴的回收率甚至达到了 100%。包装不含塑料,100% 由木质纤维制成,这些木质纤维要么也是回收材料,要么来自负责任管理的森林。Apple 在本报告中提供了详细信息https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/products/iphone/iPhone_16_Pro_and_iPhone_16_Pro_Max_PER_Sept2024.pdf.

过去,iPhone 并不以易于维修而闻名。不过,现在这种情况已经大为改观,因为现在的 iPhone 内部结构更加模块化,可以从两侧打开。此外,集成在 iOS 系统中的维修助手可以帮助用户在更换部件后避免软件错误。

因此,有经验的用户可以自己修理 iPhone。虽然他们需要专用工具,但Apple 也提供了这些工具和详细的维修手册。.

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 和大量移动频率

iPhone 16 Pro 支持目前最快的 WiFi 标准,即 WiFi 7 和 2x2 MIMO,因此也可以访问 6 GHz 频段。它支持 2400 MBit/s 的最大数据传输速率,但带宽限制在 160 MHz。

使用我们的 WiFi 6E 参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000,iPhone 16 Pro 实现了稳定的传输速率,但最大带宽仅为 80 MHz,明显低于峰值为 921 Mbps 的 iPhone 15 Pro。

iPhone 16 Pro 是一款真正的 "世界手机"。它支持众多频段,可以在全球范围内畅通无阻地使用。对于 5G 和 4G 连接,它使用 4x4 MIMO,即同时在四个信道上发射和接收。不过,与 iPhone 15 Pro的情况一样,通过毫米波实现的更快的 5G 连接仅限于美国用户。

Networking
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
921 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
622 (min: 487) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
969 (min: 436) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 1360) MBit/s ∼80%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1449 (min: 1287) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1198 (min: 1116) MBit/s ∼69%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
638 (min: 501) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
935 (min: 900) MBit/s ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S24
iperf3 receive AXE11000
774 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
913 (min: 688) MBit/s ∼51%
Sony Xperia 5 V
iperf3 receive AXE11000
838 (min: 818) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
958 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼54%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1717 (min: 1627) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1783 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1728 (min: 1374) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1731 (min: 1657) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼80%
07515022530037545052560067575082590097510501125120012751350Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro, Apple A18 Pro GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø969 (436-1159)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro, Apple A18 Pro GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1387 (1360-1402)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro, Apple A18 Pro GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø921 (876-946)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (699-820)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro, Apple A18 Pro GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø622 (487-659)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø913 (688-994)

iPhone 16 Pro 支持 GPS、GLONASS、Galileo、QZSS、北斗和 NavIC 卫星导航服务。在我们的测试中,它在户外的定位精度约为 3 米,即使在短途骑行中也能保持这一精度。与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表相比,这款智能手机在狭窄的老城区街道上并不能总是准确定位我们的位置,但它的精确度仍能轻松胜任高要求的导航任务。

GPS 测试Apple iPhone 16 Pro:概述
GPS 测试Apple iPhone 16 Pro:概述
GPS 测试Apple iPhone 16 Pro:桥梁
GPS 测试Apple iPhone 16 Pro:桥梁
GPS 测试Apple iPhone 16 Pro:转折点
GPS 测试Apple iPhone 16 Pro:转折点
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:概述
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:概述
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:桥梁
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:桥梁
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:转折点
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:转折点

电话功能和通话质量

在测试过程中,iPhone 16 Pro 的通话质量非常出色。在拨打移动电话和固定电话网络时,我们完全能听清通话对方的声音,与对方也没有任何沟通问题。在免提模式下,我们与对方的通话声音略小,但整体清晰度仍然很高。

如果没有手机网络或无线局域网,iPhone 16 Pro 还可以通过卫星连接拨打紧急电话。救援服务人员随后会收到一条短信,即使在理想的条件下,即在天空视野清晰的情况下,也需要 30 秒左右的时间。

Apple iPhone 的卫星紧急呼叫功能在激活后两年内免费提供。不过,如果在紧急情况下由于没有激活订阅而无法使用这一救生功能,那将会是很糟糕的公关行为,因此该功能将 可能会永久免费.

相机 - 带有 5 倍光学远摄变焦功能的三重相机

自拍摄像头
自拍摄像头

与前代产品相比,这款手机的相机系统发生了不少变化,因为Apple 为 iPhone 16 Pro 配备了与 iPhone 16 Pro Max 相同的摄像头。三摄像头辅以激光雷达扫描仪。

像往常一样,iPhone 16 Pro 配备了一个 4800 万像素的主摄像头(f/1.78,24 毫米),具有光学防抖功能,可拍摄 2400 万像素的标准照片。全部 4800 万像素可用于HEIF MaxProRaw Max模式。主摄像头还具有 2 倍远摄变焦功能,工作像素为 1200 万像素。

主摄像头还配有一个超广角镜头(f/2.2,13 毫米),分辨率为 4800 万像素(以前为 1200 万像素)。第三个镜头是支持 OIS 的 1200 万像素长焦摄像头,去年的机型提供三倍光学放大。现在,它具有 5 倍光学变焦(f/2.8,120 毫米)。效果令人印象深刻,即使在 25 倍数字放大时也依然可用。变焦系数可以 0.1 为单位进行调节。

使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片

iPhone 16 Pro 的主摄像头能拍摄出动态范围相当大的出色照片,显示出大量细节和均衡的色彩描绘。4800 万像素镜头甚至能胜任困难的拍摄条件,无论光线条件多么恶劣,都能拍出令人满意的照片。使用 4800 万像素超广角摄像头拍摄的照片无法与主摄像头的照片相媲美,但如果有足够的环境光线,照片的曝光效果和细节都会很好。不过,你还是不应该放大照片,因为它们很快就会变得像素化。

iPhone 16 Pro 可以 4K 和高达每秒 120 帧的速度录制视频。在此过程中,你可以在 1 倍和 2 倍变焦之间切换。效果令人印象深刻,但文件大小也是如此。以 120fps 的速度录制一分钟的 4K 视频需要大约 800 MB 的存储空间。如果将录制限制在 60fps 的 4K,则可以在广角到 15 倍数码变焦之间对图像进行放大和缩小。

使用超广角相机拍摄的照片
使用超广角相机拍摄的照片
使用超广角相机拍摄的照片
使用超广角相机拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片(无变焦)
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片(无变焦)
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片(2 倍变焦)
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片(2 倍变焦)
使用长焦相机(5 倍变焦)拍摄的照片
使用长焦相机(5 倍变焦)拍摄的照片
使用长焦相机(25 倍数码变焦)拍摄的照片
使用长焦相机(25 倍数码变焦)拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide-angleLow-light photo

在实验室中,我们再次观察了主摄像头在全棚照明和仅 1 勒克斯照明下的表现。在最佳光照条件下,iPhone 16 Pro 仍能拍摄出不错的照片,但已无法清晰捕捉测试图表的边缘。在 1 勒克斯的残余光照下,测试图仍然完全可辨。

ColorChecker
4 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
0.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 16 Pro: 7.34 ∆E min: 0.95 - max: 11.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.3 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
21 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
23 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
23 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 16 Pro: 20.16 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 27.95 ∆E

配件和保修 - 手机仅随附一条 USB 2.0 数据线

测试设备的扁平包装内除了一条 USB-C 连接线外,只有一个 SIM 卡工具,以及一些宣传单和信息资料。这次没有附带Apple 贴纸。如果您想快速传输数据或将智能手机显示屏上的内容镜像到显示器上,随附的 USB-C 数据线就有点浪费时间了,因为它只支持 USB 2.0。

Apple 美国的智能手机配件商店为其智能手机提供了大量配件,如 30 瓦电源(39 美元https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MW2G3AM/A/30w-usb-c-power-adapter?fnode=68d5cc15b455cd266983977a487bb7a85d5ff9b2a9df4229179031c720397c278043a01a8c9d2aa01b62ed2cc0af200aa89f644b396e03bf36220b63fc98c51cc3b85f32bef1761b21075c19019e4417f5544d6ce100e7dce25bf4301cc69852(39 美元)、MagSafe 充电器(39 美元)和带有 MagSafe 功能的保护套(50美元起)。如果从第三方卖家购买保护套,花费可能会少一些。Torras 为这次测试提供了Ostand 360° 保护套。可与 MagSafe 一起使用,价格约为 43 美元。

可选的 MagSafe 适配器(图片来源:Apple)
可选的 MagSafe 适配器(图片来源:Apple)
可选的 30 瓦电源(图片来源:Apple)
可选的 30 瓦电源(图片来源:Apple)
托拉斯 Ostand 360° 保护套
托拉斯 Ostand 360° 保护套

输入设备和操作 - 新型触觉照相机按钮

iPhone 16 Pro 采用 120 Hz 面板,操作起来非常流畅。由于 A18 ProSoC 提供了过剩的性能,我们在测试中没有遇到任何卡顿或延迟,即使同时打开大量应用程序也是如此。

FaceID 可用于生物识别解锁手机;它采用 3D 面部识别技术,可确保高度的安全性,而且运行速度超快、流畅。在Apple 目前的产品组合中,指纹传感器只安装在 iPhone SE(2022 年).

在 iPhone 15 Pro 上已经可以看到操作按钮。 iPhone 15 Pro该按键的标准功能是静音,但也可用于使用 Shazam 识别音乐、打开相机应用或激活手电筒等。

iPhone 16 Pro 的触觉拍照按钮是另一项新功能。如果手机处于锁定状态,双击该按钮即可启动相机应用。如果手机已解锁,则只需轻按一次即可。相机应用打开时,它就像一个快门按钮。

与此同时,相机按钮还可以充当迷你触摸板。如果你轻按它的表面,直到感觉到细微的震动,然后你就可以沿着它的触摸感应表面轻扫来调整变焦系数。轻按两下即可调出菜单,进入更多相机设置,如曝光时间、光圈和色调值。

使用这个新按钮操作相机需要一些练习,但一旦你习惯了,它就会非常好用。至于它在多大程度上有意义,特别是所有拍摄参数都可以直接通过相机应用程序本身进行设置,则是另一个问题。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - OLED 面板增至 6.3 英寸

子像素
子像素

今年 Pro 机型的屏幕增大了不少,边框更细,从 6.1 英寸增至 6.3 英寸。OLED 面板的分辨率为 2622 x 1206 像素,比上一代机型的分辨率略高,但像素密度基本保持不变,确保了非常清晰的显示效果。显示屏的刷新率可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节,滚动时感觉超级流畅,观看静态内容时也非常省电。

在显示纯白背景时,OLED 面板的亮度可达 1095 cd/m²,略高于制造商标称的最大典型亮度。在显示较小的摘录内容时(APL18 测量值),显示屏的亮度更高。在这种情况下,OLED 面板在 HDR 模式下的亮度可达 1548 cd/m²,接近Apple 标称的 1600 nits。

在最低亮度下,OLED 面板会以 239 Hz 的频率闪烁,这可能是 PWM 的缘故。值得庆幸的是,闪烁相当均匀,因此对敏感用户来说应该不是问题。如果您有任何疑问,可以在购买前到店试机。

1023
cd/m²
1026
cd/m²
1033
cd/m²
1035
cd/m²
1034
cd/m²
1036
cd/m²
1042
cd/m²
1037
cd/m²
1038
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1042 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1033.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1034 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.1"
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy S24
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2"
Sony Xperia 5 V
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"
Xiaomi 14 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
11%
3%
-51%
-16%
-10%
Brightness middle
1034
1092
6%
1024
-1%
1349
30%
889
-14%
1025
-1%
Brightness
1034
1086
5%
1019
-1%
1369
32%
898
-13%
1046
1%
Brightness Distribution
98
99
1%
98
0%
97
-1%
97
-1%
95
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.98
0.91
7%
1.05
-7%
3.3
-237%
1.4
-43%
1.1
-12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.76
1.95
29%
1.81
34%
5
-81%
4.5
-63%
2.9
-5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.3
19%
1.7
-6%
2.4
-50%
1
37%
2.2
-38%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.215 99%
2.332 94%
1.97 112%
2.23 99%
2.25 98%
CCT
6638 98%
6481 100%
6412 101%
6635 98%
6456 101%
6622 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 239 Hz
Amplitude: 15 %

The display backlight flickers at 239 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 239 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

亮度为 100
亮度为 100
亮度 75
亮度 75
50 % 亮度
50 % 亮度
25 % 亮度
25 % 亮度
最低亮度
最低亮度

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

在色彩描绘方面,OLED 面板提供了一流的效果,只要选择正确的设置,就能轻松将手机用于专业用途。为此,您应该关闭 "真实色调 "功能,因为它会根据环境光线自动调整色彩,从而使色彩显示略微失真。

色彩精度
色彩精度
灰度
灰度
色彩饱和度
色彩饱和度
色彩空间覆盖率 sRGB
色彩空间覆盖率 sRGB
色彩空间覆盖范围 DCI-P3
色彩空间覆盖范围 DCI-P3
色彩空间覆盖率 AdobeRGB
色彩空间覆盖率 AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7 ms rise
↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在室外,即使在明亮的环境中,iPhone 16 Pro 的显示屏依然清晰易读。如有需要,视角稳定的 OLED 面板可调节亮度,使其达到超高亮度。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 配备Apple A18 Pro 的 iPhone 16 Pro

AppleA18 Pro将在 iPhone 16 Pro 中工作,与之相比 A17 ProApple 的 CPU 性能提高了 15%,图形性能提高了 20%。此外,据说 A18 Pro 执行Apple 智能功能的速度可提高 15%。为此,Apple 将其 6 核 CPU 的时钟频率提高到了 4.04 GHz(A17 Pro:3.78 GHz),并采用了台积电先进的 3 纳米制造工艺。

在 CPU 基准测试中,A18 Pro 几乎自始至终都名列前茅,有时甚至将 A17 Pro 甩得远远的--尽管它并不总是能实现所承诺的 15% 的性能提升。在安兔兔 v10 测试中,只有 小米 14 Pro骁龙 8 代 3才勉强多得了几分。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average Apple A18 Pro
  (3443 - 3479, n=2)
3461 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
3443 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
3149 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2900 Points -16%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2278 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2045 Points -41%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
2006 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points -57%
Multi-Core
Average Apple A18 Pro
  (8524 - 8568, n=2)
8546 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
8524 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
7663 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7200 Points -16%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6875 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6456 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
5198 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points -51%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
2437 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro
  ()
2437 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
2327 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2138 Points -12%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1687 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1553 Points -36%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1497 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -57%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
6687 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro
  ()
6687 Points 0%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6439 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
6130 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
5561 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
5305 Points -21%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
4998 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -48%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1905751 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1867306 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro
  (1739816 - 1867306, n=2)
1803561 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1616403 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1505982 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
1419444 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points -30%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Apple A18 Pro
  (1455 - 1517, n=2)
1486 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1455 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
1407 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1402 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1256 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1170 Points -20%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1167 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -37%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
33743 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro
  (33044 - 33743, n=2)
33394 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
32966 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
31531 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1160 Points -97%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1134 Points -97%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
4619 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro
  ()
4619 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
4122 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=41, last 2 years)
766 Points -83%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
277 Points -94%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
32120 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
31973 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro
  ()
31973 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=41, last 2 years)
3626 Points -89%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
321 Points -99%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
44381 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
44187 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro
  ()
44187 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=41, last 2 years)
5224 Points -88%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1058 Points -98%

GPU 测试表明 A18 Pro的 6 核 GPU 并没有让 A17 Pro的图形芯片。在 GFXBench 中的差距尤其大,但还不足以击败Android 的竞争对手。小米 小米 14 Pro在 GFXBench 测试中速度更快,而三星 三星Galaxy S24的性能接近 iPhone 16 Pro。在屏幕测试中,我们的测试对象被降速至 60fps,与 iPhone 15 Pro 一样 iPhone 15 Pro.在 3DMark 中,新 Pro 机型一直名列前茅。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
3987 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3933 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
3815 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3627 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
3286 Points -18%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
4628 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
4239 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3902 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
3781 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3667 Points -21%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
7750 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
6827 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6649 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
6552 Points -15%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
8242 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
7412 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6673 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
5946 Points -28%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
1647 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
1443 Points -12%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
1806 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
1634 Points -10%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +107%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +107%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +105%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
58 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
543 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
518 fps
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
476 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
403 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
393 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
350.2 fps -32%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +105%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +105%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +103%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
58.5 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
362 fps +21%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
300 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
289 fps -4%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
250 fps -17%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
209.2 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +101%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +101%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +101%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.6 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps +13%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
237.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps -10%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
205 fps -14%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
174 fps -27%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
147.7 fps -38%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +75%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +69%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps +47%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
59.5 fps -1%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
154.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps -15%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
111.2 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
109.5 fps -29%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +76%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps +46%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps +28%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.5 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
58.1 fps -2%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps +23%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
69.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -12%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
47.6 fps -31%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +99%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps +97%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +82%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.8 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps +19%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
176.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
147.1 fps -16%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
140 fps -20%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
124 fps -30%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps +8%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
29.6 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
21.3 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
19.6 fps -34%

上网冲浪是 iPhone 16 Pro 的一大亮点,因为网站打开速度非常快,而且可以快速滚动浏览。Apple 智能手机在浏览器测试中创造了新的记录。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
386.723 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro (354 - 387, n=2)
370 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)
351.1 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus (Safari 18)
269.868 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
179.212 Points -54%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
162.564 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
128.638 Points -67%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -68%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
569 runs/min
Average Apple A18 Pro (557 - 569, n=2)
563 runs/min -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)
396 runs/min -30%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
267 runs/min -53%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
179 runs/min -69%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min -75%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
141 runs/min -75%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
33.5 runs/min
Average Apple A18 Pro (33.5 - 33.5, n=2)
33.5 runs/min 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus (Safari 18)
29.9 runs/min -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=66, last 2 years)
11.9 runs/min -64%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Apple A18 Pro (267 - 271, n=2)
269 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
267 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Plus (Safari 18)
263 Points -1%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
181 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
176 Points -34%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
171 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points -56%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Apple A18 Pro (98997 - 100368, n=2)
99683 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
98997 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Plus (Safari 18)
90158 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)
89112 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
63748 Points -36%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
61881 Points -37%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
54365 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -450%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
801.6 ms * -189%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
705.9 ms * -155%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
662.3 ms * -139%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)
388.1 ms * -40%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus (Safari 18)
290.2 ms * -5%
Average Apple A18 Pro (277 - 279, n=2)
278 ms * -0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
276.9 ms *

* ... smaller is better

从主观上看,iPhone 16 Pro 在日常使用中反应迅速,即使是大型应用程序也能在短时间内下载完成。遗憾的是,我们无法客观地评估Apple NVMe 闪存的性能,因为 iOS 没有可靠的存储基准。

游戏 - 功能强大的游戏平台

iPhone 16 Pro 的硬件加速光线追踪和人工智能功能为 AAA 级游戏提供了充足的动力。刺客信条:幻影》或《生化危机 4》等著名游戏应该已经可以在 iPhone 16 机型上流畅运行--也许速度没有那么快,但你肯定不一定需要 Pro 机型来玩游戏。

对于 iPhone 16 Pro 的游戏性能,我们没有什么可抱怨的。即使是要求苛刻的游戏,如《源氏冲击》,在最高图形设置下也能始终流畅运行。在最低细节级别,游戏最高支持 120fps,就像《PUBG Mobile》一样。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.0.0: Ø109.3 (80-120)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.0.0: Ø65.2 (39-113)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.4.0: Ø116.6 (111-120)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.4.0: Ø57 (50-60)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.4.0: Ø46.2 (29-60)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 3.1.0: Ø57.7 (43-60)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 3.1.0: Ø58.2 (46-60)

排放 - 负载时出现明显节流

温度

在我们的测试中,iPhone 16 Pro 的温度升至 45.9 °C,但这是在接受了一个小时的 Linpack 压力测试之后才出现的。不过,在正常运行时,它的温度保持得很好。

在 3DMark 压力测试中,智能手机的性能在某些情况下下降了三分之一以上。不过,鉴于其巨大的性能储备,这在日常使用中应该不会很明显。

Max. Load
 40.9 °C42 °C41.6 °C 
 42 °C43.2 °C39.1 °C 
 42.3 °C44.2 °C38.9 °C 
Maximum: 44.2 °C
Average: 41.6 °C
39.9 °C43.2 °C36.9 °C
40.7 °C44.7 °C40.5 °C
40.5 °C45.9 °C42.5 °C
Maximum: 45.9 °C
Average: 41.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.1 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
95.8 % +4%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
92.5 %
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
84.9 % -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % -18%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 % -44%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
95.9 % +57%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
69.7 % +14%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60.9 %
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57 % -6%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % -16%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
88.9 % +36%
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
76.1 % +16%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
65.6 %
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % -12%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
82 % +30%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
62.9 %
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø19.3 (17.6-28.9)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.4 (16-16.7)
Apple iPhone 16 Plus A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.3 (17.1-24.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.9 (14.7-25.8)
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø15.8 (11.4-22.1)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø58.3 (55.4-59.9)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.5 (50-58.9)
Apple iPhone 16 Plus A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø54.3 (52.9-55.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73 (66.2-87.7)
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø54 (40.8-78.5)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.7 (67.1-109.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.6 (62-85.7)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø19.5 (17.4-27.8)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.8 (16.9-29.8)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø19.2 (17.6-26.8)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.6 (14.8-16.7)
Apple iPhone 16 Plus A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (17.7-23.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.3 (16.7-28.9)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø10.5 (9.54-15.2)
Apple iPhone 16 Plus A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø9.6 (8.88-10.8)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro

发言人

立体声扬声器不会产生过于强劲的声音,但它们能很好地传达声音,整体听起来相对平衡。扬声器在高音量时不会失真,但听起来确实有点刺耳。

外置音频设备可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.3 与智能手机连接。在无线音频传输方面,iPhone 16 Pro 仅支持Apple AAC,因此不支持任何高音质认证 BT 编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.836.92539.836.53129.1264029.528.15032.734.56321.926.78014.62510017.538.712520.246.816027.251.420021.252.925018.355.331521.557.140021.256.750018.95863018.859.680018.762.4100016.260.8125014.562.516001267.6200012.269.4250014.169.2315016.463.7400018.159500021.366.2630019.571.2800024.272.31000017.8741250018.564.81600020.250.1SPL30.879.6N1.444.6median 18.7median 60.8Delta2.26.636.236.430.733.325.636.826.733.336.735.824.636.417.639.218.739.818.244.515.956.117.35615.260.414.161.913.462.113.86714.365.413.770.612.476.112.777.712.175.212.978.512.579.312.282.712.882.713.181.313.582.613.17913.775.91472.513.36925.291.40.786.8median 13.5median 75.21.28.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone 16 ProSamsung Galaxy S24
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池使用时间 - 电池容量更大的 iPhone 16 Pro

耗电量

在满载状态下,iPhone 16 Pro 的电池耗电量相当大,在我们的测试中,它的耗电量高达 14.4 瓦。与此同时,它在空闲模式下也能节俭地运行,平均耗电量为 0.6 瓦,在能效方面击败了所有其他对比设备,与 iPhone 15 Pro 并驾齐驱。

新款 Pro 的充电速度略有提高,从 20 瓦增至 25 瓦。在我们的测试中,空电池需要 55 分钟才能恢复到 80% 的电量。充满电需要 1:45 小时。

智能手机也可以通过 MagSafe 以 25 瓦的功率充电。通过 Qi 无线充电的功率可达 7.5 瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.4 / 0.6 / 1 Watt
Load midlight 11 / 14.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
3582 mAh
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
3274 mAh
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
4674 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 V
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh
Average Apple A18 Pro
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-12%
-33%
-24%
-25%
-31%
-14%
-50%
Idle Minimum *
0.4
0.7
-75%
0.8
-100%
0.42
-5%
0.79
-98%
0.89
-123%
0.41 ?(0.4 - 0.42, n=2)
-3%
Idle Average *
0.6
0.9
-50%
1
-67%
0.93
-55%
1.08
-80%
1.05
-75%
1.075 ?(0.6 - 1.55, n=2)
-79%
Idle Maximum *
1
1.1
-10%
1.2
-20%
1.07
-7%
1.12
-12%
1.11
-11%
1.29 ?(1 - 1.58, n=2)
-29%
Load Average *
11
6
45%
9.5
14%
15.43
-40%
7.93
28%
9.03
18%
7.21 ?(3.41 - 11, n=2)
34%
Load Maximum *
14.4
10.1
30%
13.6
6%
16.51
-15%
8.78
39%
9.06
37%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.13 (0.4228-13.5)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Apple A17 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.41 (0.841-10.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.31 (0.634-16.5)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.615 (0.526-1.057)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Apple A17 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.745 (0.675-1.008)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.6 (11.2-14.4)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Apple A17 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.64 (5.12-6.05)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.2 (6.48-16.6)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.615 (0.526-1.057)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Apple A17 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.745 (0.675-1.008)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)

运行时间

iPhone 16 Pro 的电池容量是新款 iPhone 阵容中最大的飞跃。电池容量从 3274 mAh 增加到 3582 mAh,相当于增加了 9%。

在我们的测试中,iPhone 16 Pro 比 iPhone 15 Pro 多运行了约 1.5 个小时。 iPhone 15 Pro长约 1.5 小时。在连续循环播放视频时,iPhone 16 Pro 的优势仍然是 1 小时左右。总之,iPhone 16 Pro 的电量足以让要求苛刻的用户使用一整天。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
55h 15min
WiFi Websurfing
16h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
26h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 38min
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
3582 mAh
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
3274 mAh
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
4674 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 V
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
16%
-22%
11%
-18%
Reader / Idle
3315
2714
-18%
2668
-20%
2398
-28%
2788
-16%
1998
-40%
H.264
1583
1522
-4%
1657
5%
1227
-22%
1493
-6%
1437
-9%
WiFi v1.3
983
832
-15%
1144
16%
880
-10%
952
-3%
897
-9%
Load
218
362
66%
355
63%
159
-27%
371
70%
189
-13%

Pros

+ 高质量外壳,通过 ip68 认证
+ 明亮准确的 120 Hz 显示屏
+ 多功能三摄像头,带 5 倍远摄功能
+ USB 3.2(第 2 代)
+ WiFi 7
+ 超宽带、Thread 网络和双 eSIM 卡
+ 世界手机
+ 极高性能
+ 出色的电池续航时间
+ 更新交付时间长

Cons

- 最大带宽为 160 MHz 的 WiFi 7
- 仅 aac 作为蓝牙音频编解码器
- 仅附带 USB 2.0 连接线
- 保修期仅为 12 个月
- 充电速度相对较慢

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 的评价

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 评测
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 评测

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 进行了强大的升级。其中最大的进步之一可以在打开手机的一瞬间看到,由于边框大幅纤薄,iPhone 16 Pro 以前 6.1 英寸的 OLED 显示屏已增至 6.3 英寸,而智能手机的物理尺寸却没有发生任何变化。新的相机按钮也让人眼前一亮。

进一步改进:A18 Pro A18 Pro的速度比去年的 SoC 更快,它还包括专用的人工智能计算单元,此外,更大的电池确保了 iPhone 16 Pro 更长的续航时间。此外,由于增加了 5 倍长焦镜头,其摄像头设置甚至与 iPhone 16 Pro Max 相同。

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 是最好的紧凑型智能手机之一,它的许多方面都比上一代产品有了进一步的巨大进步。

Apple 新款 iPhone 16 Pro 的整体性能非常出色,总体而言也是市场上最好的紧凑型智能手机之一。不出所料,999 美元的入门级价格也相应较高。

与前代产品相比,iPhone 16 Pro 的改进只是循序渐进的--这里好一点,那里多一点。不过,对于以下用户来说,它仍然值得升级 iPhone 15 Pro用户来说,还是值得升级的,尤其是如果摄影是你的主要关注点的话,因为 iPhone 16 Pro 的 5 倍变焦摄像头对它很有利。

看来,新款 iPhone 的 "杀手级功能 "还需要再等一段时间。Apple 要到今年晚些时候才会在美国发布其广为宣传的人工智能功能。

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 的替代品包括三星Galaxy S24索尼 Xperia 5 V 。这两款手机的价格都要低很多,但仍然同样小巧,只是功能没有那么强大。不过,它们都有 120 Hz 的显示屏。

价格和供应情况

您可以直接从Apple 购买新款 iPhone 16 Pro,售价从 999 美元起。

这款智能手机也可通过亚马逊等其他在线零售商购买。

Bestpreis 1103€ Bettste
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 128GB Titan Schwarz
2. 1120 € mobizone
3. 1120 € My hello
4. 1129 € Handywebshop.com

请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.

Apple iPhone 16 Pro - 11/11/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
64 / 69 → 93%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
38 / 55 → 69%
Application Performance
87 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
95%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
87%
Average
82%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
81%
Materials
50%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
96.3%
Repairability
71%
Software Updates
83.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 79.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple iPhone 16 Pro 智能手机评测--配备大显示屏的小型 Pro 手机
Manuel Masiero, 2024-10-10 (Update: 2024-10-10)