Notebookcheck Logo

Apple iPhone 15 Pro 智能手机评测--替代 PlayStation 的高端手机?

USB 承诺。

iPhone 15 Pro 旨在秉承Apple 长期以来提供高品质智能手机的传统。它在 2023 年的主要创新包括注入钛金属的机身、引入 USB-C 端口和集成新的游戏 GPU。我们的测试评估了Apple 是否又成功打造了一款 "卓越 "的智能手机。
Apple 5G ARM Smartphone
Apple iPhone 15 Pro

每年,加利福尼亚州库比蒂诺都会向全世界推出新款 iPhone,通常有几种款式,包括高端的 Pro、经济实惠的 SE 和标准机型,通常有不同的尺寸。 每年都会发布新的 iOS 版本,同时也会有显著的机型进步。这一次,Apple ,它将推出一个游戏项目,其中包括流行的 AAA 级游戏的原生选项,而这些游戏通常只保留给 PC 或游戏机。

更大的 iPhone 15 Pro Max此前我们已对其进行过测试。本次评测的重点是Apple iPhone 15 Pro,它的与众不同之处在于采用了钛金属机身和支持光线追踪的 GPU,这是两项值得注意的进步。

一直以来,Apple 的智能手机在我们的测试中表现出色。尽管如此,我们还是对 iPhone 15 Pro 进行了与其他智能手机相同的严格测试。让我们深入了解一下。

Apple iPhone 15 Pro (iPhone 15 Series)
Processor
Apple A17 Pro 6 x 2.1 - 3.8 GHz, Coll APL1V02
Graphics adapter
Apple A17 Pro GPU
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.10 inch 19.5:9, 2556 x 1179 pixel 461 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Super Retina XDR OLED, Fingerprint-resistant oleophobic coating, Ceramic Shield, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB 
, 100 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B30/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B46/​B48/​B53/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n25/​n26/​n28/​n30/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n53/​n66/​n70/​n77/​n78/​n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 146.6 x 70.6
Battery
3274 mAh Lithium-Ion, 20W charging (USB), 15W wireless charging (MagSafe), 7.5W wireless charging (Qi)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple iOS 17
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.78, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF), OIS, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​60fps (Camera 1); 12.0MP, f/​1.78, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF), OIS, telephoto lens (Camera 2); 12.0MP, f/​2.2, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF), wide angle
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix f/​1.9, phase comparison-AF, Videos @2160p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), USB-C-cable, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, Dual-eSIM-Support, IP68-certified, satellite communication (text messages, emergency calls), fanless, waterproof
Weight
187 g
Price
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
90.7 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU
187 g128 GB NVMe6.10"2556x1179
90.3 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core
206 g256 GB NVMe6.10"2556x1179
89.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Xiaomi 13 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
229 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440
89 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Sony Xperia 5 V
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
182 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2520x1080
90.5 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy S23
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740
167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080

Apple iPhone 15 Pro 采用钛金属作为主要材料,边框主要由回收铝制成,并通过扩散焊接在铝表面镀上一层薄薄的钛金属。钛以强度高、重量轻著称,与 iPhone 14 Pro 相比, ,重量减轻了近 10%。Apple iPhone 14 Pro.iPhone 15 Pro 比前代产品轻 0.05 磅,但仍重于三星 S23。 三星Galaxy S23 还要重。.

手机的宽度和长度均减少了 0.03 英寸,但由于摄像头模块从外壳中突出的部分较多,手机厚度增加了约 0.02 英寸。外壳构造精美。

值得注意的是,iPhone 15 Pro 的边缘比前代产品更加柔软,增强了握持感和舒适度。背板由磨砂玻璃制成,并饰有光亮的Apple 徽标,散发着优雅的气息。此外,Apple 在正面使用了陶瓷盾,以保护显示屏免受划痕和裂纹的伤害。整部手机防尘防水,符合 IP68 标准和 IEC 60529 标准,可在 19.7 英尺深的水中浸泡 30 分钟。

除了白色和黑色,iPhone 15 Pro 还有钛金色(Titanium Nature)可供选择,这是一种略带金色的金属色调。我们的测试机采用的是第四种颜色,即闪闪发光的金属蓝。

Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro

尺寸比较

162.9 mm 74.6 mm 8.38 mm 229 g154 mm 68 mm 8.6 mm 182 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 7.85 mm 206 g146.6 mm 70.6 mm 8.3 mm 187 g146.3 mm 70.9 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连通性 - 价格下降

在通货膨胀率居高不下的今天,我们欣喜地看到Apple 根据存储配置的不同,iPhone 15 Pro 的价格比上一代产品至少降低了 100 美元:

  • 128 GB 存储空间:999 美元
  • 256 GB 存储空间:1099 美元
  • 512 GB 存储空间:1299 美元
  • 1 TB 存储:1499 美元

所有型号均包含 8 GB 内存。

在欧盟的压力下,Apple ,在第 15 代 iPhone 中加入了 USB-C 接口。这一改变不仅确保了与各种充电器的兼容性,而且还规定使用Lightning 接口的旧配件必须使用适配器。新的 USB-C 接口的数据传输速率高达 10 GB/s,与其他高端设备的传输速率一致。此外,现在还支持 HDR 视频输出和高达 4K 的分辨率,这比之前Lightning 端口的限制有了很大提升。

虽然仍然不能通过 microSD 扩展内部存储,但可以通过 iPhone 的 USB-C 端口连接外部存储设备。

左:SIM 卡插槽、音量按钮、操作按钮
左:SIM 卡插槽、音量按钮、操作按钮
右键待机按钮
右键待机按钮
顶部:无连接
顶部:无连接
底部扬声器、USB-C 接口、麦克风
底部扬声器、USB-C 接口、麦克风

软件 - 大概是长期更新

iOS 17 是Apple 移动操作系统的最新版本。虽然Apple 历来为其 iPhone 提供至少 5 年的更新,但该公司并未就更新的持续时间发表官方声明。

这种做法强化了Apple 的封闭生态系统:许多实用功能在与其他Apple 设备结合时可无缝运行。在 Windows PC 上,你可以访问 iPhone 拍摄的照片或视频,通过 iTunes 同步媒体库或创建备份。不过,在 Mac 上体验要流畅得多。iMessage 等应用程序和新的可定制来电显示功能是 iPhone 独有的。

最新版本的Apple 操作系统为操作系统和随附的应用程序引入了大量更新和新功能。例如,你现在可以通过定位功能与其他 iPhone 用户分享你到达任何地点的预计时间。如果你到达或离开了目的地,系统会发送相应的通知。

健康 app 现在可以让你更加关注自己的精神健康。在手机的各个部分,都会提示你确认是否要查看裸体照片等敏感内容,或者你也可以进行模糊预览以了解内容。

搜索功能中的搜索条件现在可以组合使用,以便进行更详细的查询。访问Apple 网站

USB-C 端口符合 DisplayPort 规范,让你可以将 iPhone 15 Pro 连接到显示器。目前还没有专门的桌面模式,而是镜像 iPhone 的屏幕。

软件 iPhone 15 Pro
软件 iPhone 15 Pro
软件 iPhone 15 Pro

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 6 千兆赫无线局域网的 iPhone 15 Pro

最后,iPhone 15 Pro 配备了 WiFi 6E,使其能够访问不太拥挤的 6 GHz Wi-Fi 频段。我们的测试设备达到的速度远远高于 iPhone 14 Pro的速度要高得多,这是因为没有旧设备对频谱造成干扰,而且还有额外的 160 MHz 频道可用。因此,如果服务器允许,iPhone 15 Pro 可以充分利用千兆互联网连接的速度潜力。

在使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 作为参考路由器进行的测试中,我们获得了高达 1543 MBit/s 的速度。传输速率始终保持在 1 GBit/s 以上。尽管 iPhone 采用了金属外壳,但由于在设备的四个窄边上安装了天线,看起来就像细条一样,因此接收效果很好。当靠近路由器时,iPhone 可以获得完全的信号强度,几乎可以立即加载网站;甚至在滚动时,图像也几乎总是可用的。在距离路由器 33 英尺并穿过三面墙时,信号强度下降到 2/3,导致网页加载速度稍慢。

iPhone 15 Pro 配备的移动调制解调器是高通公司的 Snapdragon X70,最高下载速度可达 10 GBit/s。它首次利用人工智能优化了 5G 网络的速度和接收质量。从理论上讲,iPhone 15 Pro 支持全球目前使用的所有 5G 频率;但毫米波技术仍是Apple 美国客户的专属技术。此外,该设备在 4G 范围内提供广泛的频率覆盖,使其能够访问全球移动互联网服务。

Networking
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1449 (min: 1287) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1198 (min: 1116) MBit/s ∼73%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 365) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
822 (min: 409) MBit/s ∼47%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
809 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
993 (min: 972) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1859 (min: 919) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1637 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼100%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
838 (min: 818) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
958 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1659 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1749 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1799 (min: 1744) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1590 (min: 1562) MBit/s ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
711 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1443 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼85%
0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520Tooltip
Apple iPhone 15 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1449 (1287-1543)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1197 (1116-1235)
GPS 接收
GPS 接收

iPhone 的追踪模块可以在室内约 33 英尺范围内精确定位我们的位置,在室外可达到 6.5 至 13 英尺的精度,并支持全球所有卫星网络。

我们在骑车过程中测试了手机的追踪精度,并与 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表进行了比较。

在测试过程中,iPhone 15 Pro 表现出色,甚至能记录下轻微的回避动作。只有在过水上桥梁时,记录的路线才会出现偏差。总之,我们强烈推荐这款Apple 智能手机用于要求苛刻的追踪任务。

跟踪Apple iPhone 15 Pro - 概述
跟踪Apple iPhone 15 Pro - 概述
跟踪Apple iPhone 15 Pro - 转折点
跟踪Apple iPhone 15 Pro - 转折点
跟踪Apple iPhone 15 Pro - Bridge
跟踪Apple iPhone 15 Pro - Bridge
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 转折点
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 转折点
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 桥接器
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 桥接器

电话功能和语音质量

iOS 手机应用程序组织有序、用户友好,提供直观的导航。不过,与Android 不同的是,如果你对它不满意,是无法更换的。

iPhone 15 Pro 支持双 SIM 卡功能,但只有一个 nano-SIM 卡插槽。因此,用户可以使用一个 nano-SIM 卡和一个 eSIM 卡或两个 eSIM 卡。

我们非常欣赏Apple 智能手机出色的语音质量。对方的声音清晰可辨。麦克风也能有效捕捉我们的声音。如果我们说话的声音太大,麦克风可能会略微失真,但它能很好地处理轻柔的声音。使用扬声器和免提麦克风时,对方的声音很容易听懂,我们的声音也能清晰地传达。不过,背景噪音并非总能完全消除。

相机 - 再次使用 3 倍光学变焦

录制前置摄像头
录制前置摄像头
人像模式前置摄像头
人像模式前置摄像头

摄像头与 iPhone 14 Pro 相同 iPhone 14 Pro的摄像头保持不变,只是在背面增加了一个激光雷达传感器。

后置主摄像头仍然拥有 4800 万像素的分辨率和光学防抖功能。Apple 引入了全新的光子引擎(Photonic Engine),允许摄像头捕捉全分辨率图像和像素降低但曝光优化的图像。然后将这些图像合成一张 2400 万像素的照片。此外,还有一项新功能允许拍摄 4800 万像素的 HEIF 照片,并可即时分享。

为了增强多功能性,该手机配备了一个广角摄像头和一个带光学变焦功能的长焦镜头,为用户提供了三种镜头选择。与前代产品类似,用户可以选择 3 倍光学变焦,通过数码变焦最高可扩展至 15 倍。该相机允许以 0.1 为增量在各个变焦级别之间无缝切换。

主摄像头的图像质量给人留下了深刻印象,拍摄效果细腻,色彩还原逼真。即使是具有挑战性的区域,如周围多云的天空,也能显示出复杂的细节。像 Honor Magic5 Pro等设备都能捕捉到更多细节。两款智能手机摄像头拍摄的照片色彩鲜艳程度不同,这是个人的主观喜好。

光学变焦提供了出色的显示性能,即使使用 15 倍数码变焦,生成的图像仍然清晰可见。这张照片是在距离喷泉管道约 16 英尺处拍摄的。

广角镜头
广角镜头
主摄像头
2 倍光学变焦
3 倍光学变焦
15 倍数码变焦

广角照片光线充足,细节丰富,但不建议过度放大。在光线非常暗和高对比度的情况下,广角镜头依然表现出色,拍摄出的照片效果良好。夜间模式自动启动,曝光时间为 2 秒,可手动延长或缩短。虽然在系统所选的设置下,许多细节看起来都很清晰,但在较暗的区域增加一点曝光可以提高整体质量。

Apple 在视频方面提供了多种选择,用户可以每秒 24、30 或 60 帧的速度录制 4K 视频。

此外,iPhone 15 Pro 现在还支持奥斯卡色彩编码系统(Academy Color Encoding System),这是一种用于电影制作的全球色彩标准。此外,它还将在未来获得更新,包括空间视频录制选项,以后可以通过 VR 眼镜进行体验。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera

在测试过程中,我们在全棚照明和仅有 1 勒克斯的极端弱光条件下检查了主摄像头。在光线充足的条件下,iPhone 15 Pro 可拍摄出良好的图像,尽管边缘锐度略有下降。即使在光线非常暗的情况下,图像仍然非常清晰,锐度损失很小。

ColorChecker
8.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 15 Pro: 8.95 ∆E min: 4.93 - max: 15.27 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 15 Pro: 7.35 ∆E min: 2.15 - max: 13.38 ∆E

附件和保修 - 交货时不包括电源装置

除 iPhone 外,包装中还包括一条 USB-C 至 USB-C 连接线、一个 SIM 卡工具以及文件和贴纸。缺点是:提供的数据线仅支持 USB 2.0 标准,不适合连接显示器等任务。

由于有了 USB-C 端口,iPhone 现在可以支持更多的充电器。Apple 提供兼容的充电器,售价 19 美元。另外,喜欢 MagSafe 充电的用户也可以购买相应的充电器,价格为 39 美元。

至于保护套,可选择透明保护套或彩色硅胶保护套,在Apple 商店的售价为 49 美元。新增加的 FineWoven 保护套模仿麂皮,售价 59 美元。

Apple 提供标准的 12 个月 保修为 iPhone 提供 12 个月的标准保修。

顾客可以选择AppleCare+的延长保修服务,即使标准保修期已过或发生意外损坏,也可享受为期两年的保修服务。这项额外服务的起价约为 249 美元,维修时有免赔额。

硅胶套
硅胶套
FineWoven 箱子
FineWoven 箱子
透明外壳
透明外壳

输入设备和操作 - 用操作按钮代替滑块

iPhone 15 Pro 的触摸屏每秒可显示高达 120 帧的画面,为用户带来极为流畅的使用体验。它的可靠性很高,即使在边缘和角落也反应灵敏,可确保高效使用。

虽然没有用于生物识别解锁的指纹传感器,但 Face ID 可以取而代之。该功能利用三维人脸识别技术,使操作极具挑战性。iPhone 可以迅速准确地识别注册的人脸。

过去,iPhone 有一个独特的提示滑块,可以快速静音或调节通知和来电音量。

默认情况下,它仍可用于使手机静音,但也可灵活启动相机或激活手电筒。更复杂的操作可以通过快捷键来设置。遗憾的是,目前只能配置一个选项,特别是长按,因为短按或双击无法自定义。

键盘:纵向模式
键盘:纵向模式
键盘:横向模式
键盘:横向模式

显示屏 - 明亮的 OLED 显示屏,色彩还原度高

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

iPhone 15 Pro 的 6.1 英寸 AMOLED 屏幕与 iPhone 14 Pro 相似。 iPhone 14 Pro相似,这是一个积极的指标。

在我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试中,iPhone 15 Pro 的屏幕拥有 2556 x 1179 像素的分辨率,峰值亮度约为 1086 cd/m²。值得注意的是,这一亮度是在整个屏幕为白色时观察到的;较小的表面显示出更高的亮度,在 HDR 模式下测量值超过 1900 cd/m²。



在亮度很低的情况下,我们检测到 240 Hz 的 PWM 闪烁。虽然这个频率相当平滑,一般不会对大多数用户造成问题,但对屏幕闪烁敏感的用户在购买前应仔细检查显示器。

1084
cd/m²
1079
cd/m²
1089
cd/m²
1095
cd/m²
1092
cd/m²
1079
cd/m²
1083
cd/m²
1084
cd/m²
1088
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1095 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1085.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1092 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.91 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.215
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.1"
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.1"
Xiaomi 13 Pro
OLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Sony Xperia 5 V
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"
Samsung Galaxy S23
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.1"
Screen
-22%
-12%
-33%
-92%
Brightness middle
1092
1046
-4%
1230
13%
889
-19%
1125
3%
Brightness
1086
1049
-3%
1244
15%
898
-17%
1122
3%
Brightness Distribution
99
98
-1%
94
-5%
97
-2%
96
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.91
1.2
-32%
1
-10%
1.4
-54%
3.2
-252%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.95
3.1
-59%
2.8
-44%
4.5
-131%
4.9
-151%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
1.7
-31%
1.8
-38%
1
23%
3.3
-154%
Gamma
2.215 99%
2.19 100%
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
1.97 112%
CCT
6481 100%
6538 99%
6446 101%
6456 101%
6504 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 242 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 242 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 242 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0% 亮度
0% 亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

在测量过程中,我们没有发现偏色现象,所有颜色值的显示都非常准确,但必须关闭 "真实色调 "功能。它会根据环境光线自动调整色彩,因此会使色彩失真。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 AdobeRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 AdobeRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 DCI P3
CalMAN 色彩空间 DCI P3
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise
↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.1 ms rise
↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).



OLED 显示屏在所有视角下都能提供出色的清晰度,即使从侧面观看,色彩也能保持准确。

视角稳定性
视角稳定性
室外使用
室外使用

性能 -Apple 的新动力

A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro是 iPhone 15 Pro 机型的独有配置,可提供更强大的性能,与 A16 Bionic 相比可提高 10-15 Apple A16 仿生.6 个处理器内核的时钟速度均已提升: 3.性能内核的主频为 78 GHz,效率内核的主频为 2.11 GHz。此外,该处理器现在采用 3 纳米制造工艺。

在处理器基准测试中,A17 Pro 在性能和效率方面均有显著提升。 A17 Pro在处理器基准测试中,A17 Pro 的性能明显优于前代产品和目前最快的Android 设备,领先幅度高达 25% 或 30%。

在正常使用过程中,iPhone 15 Pro 表现迅速流畅,即使是要求最苛刻的应用程序也能轻松应对。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2138 Points
Average Apple A17 Pro
  ()
2138 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1878 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1549 Points -28%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1499 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1497 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1040 Points -51%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5538 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
5305 Points
Average Apple A17 Pro
  ()
5305 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5201 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
4998 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4974 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3474 Points -35%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average Apple A17 Pro
  (2900 - 2989, n=3)
2940 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2900 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2556 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
2006 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1984 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=173, last 2 years)
1494 Points -48%
Multi-Core
Average Apple A17 Pro
  (7200 - 7452, n=3)
7299 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7200 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
6688 Points -7%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
5198 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5149 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=173, last 2 years)
4189 Points -42%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1277795 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1196960 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1134684 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
965593 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Average Apple A17 Pro
  (1402 - 1408, n=2)
1405 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1402 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1332 Points -5%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1224 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1221 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1170 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=165, last 2 years)
917 Points -35%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
37396 Points +19%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
31531 Points
Average Apple A17 Pro
  (29087 - 31531, n=2)
30309 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points -20%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1354 Points -96%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1320 Points -96%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1160 Points -96%

新的 6 核 GPU处理器 AppleA17 Pro现在支持光线追踪和网格着色,这表明Apple 有意将 PC 和游戏机上的 AAA 级游戏引入 iPhone。我们将在接下来的 "游戏 "部分对此进行深入探讨。

虽然 GPU 的性能明显优于 3DMark 基准测试,但事实证明Android 的竞争对手在 GFXBench 测试中速度更快。不过,在分辨率为 1,440p 的 GFXBench Aztec Ruins 测试中,iPhone 始终保持着稳定的 60 fps。这意味着 GPU 有足够的能力以高分辨率运行所有移动游戏,而且还有性能储备。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
3815 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3784 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3699 Points -3%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3627 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3265 Points -14%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
4239 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3857 Points -9%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3843 Points -9%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3667 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3383 Points -20%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
15577 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13993 Points -10%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13984 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13911 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
12429 Points -20%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
6827 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5603 Points -18%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
4321 Points -37%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
5946 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5583 Points -6%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3710 Points -38%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
497 fps +42%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
476 fps +36%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
462 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
459 fps +31%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
350.2 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +58%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps +44%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
292 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps +30%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
209.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +82%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
222 fps +50%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
205 fps +39%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
197 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
186 fps +26%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
147.7 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +82%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +68%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
126 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +11%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps +6%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
114 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
111.2 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +63%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps +45%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -2%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -15%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +5%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps +2%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
44 fps -27%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps +37%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps +14%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
140 fps +13%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
133 fps +7%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
124 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +53%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +53%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps +43%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
23 fps +17%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
19.6 fps

在 iPhone 15 Pro 上浏览互联网是一种令人愉悦的体验,因为网页加载迅速,而且如果网络连接良好,图片几乎可以瞬间显示。Apple 手机在基准测试中明显占优。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)
351.1 Points
Average Apple A17 Pro (254 - 351, n=3)
291 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
281.762 Points -20%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
179.212 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
158.595 Points -55%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
137.873 Points -61%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -65%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Apple A17 Pro (396 - 505, n=3)
449 runs/min +13%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)
396 runs/min
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
375 runs/min -5%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
179 runs/min -55%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min -64%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
136 runs/min -66%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
110.9 runs/min -72%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average Apple A17 Pro (301 - 313, n=3)
306 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)
301 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
292 Points -3%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
231 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)
89112 Points
Average Apple A17 Pro (86270 - 89112, n=3)
87731 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
74261 Points -17%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
61881 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
59913 Points -33%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
42544 Points -52%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -292%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
705.9 ms * -82%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
701.7 ms * -81%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
690.6 ms * -78%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
475.3 ms * -22%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)
388.1 ms *
Average Apple A17 Pro (332 - 388, n=3)
370 ms * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Apple 多年来,iPhone 一直在使用 NVMe 闪存。尽管如此,iOS 系统历来没有全面的存储基准测试,因此我们只能依靠自己的主观观察。 超短的加载时间和响应速度极快的系统为 的存储解决方案提供了支持。与 UFS 闪存相比,它具有更高的随机读写速度等技术优势。

Apple

游戏--用 iPhone 代替游戏机?

Apple A17 Pro 的高性能不仅适用于 Candy Crush 等休闲手机游戏。Apple

随着 3A 级游戏在移动游戏中的普及,尤其是任天堂 Switch 和 Steam Deck 等设备的普及,Apple 正在向这一市场靠近。他们已宣布将卡普空的《生化危机村》和育碧的《刺客信条幻影》等游戏进行转换,并将于 2023 年 10 月底推出。

在测试过程中,我们探索了《PUBG Mobile》、《源氏冲击》和《暗黑破坏神:不朽》等游戏。遗憾的是,由于GameBench的软件尚未支持 iOS 17。不过,一般来说,《PUBG》的高清帧率为 60 帧,超清帧率为 40 帧。暗黑破坏神:不朽》在高分辨率下可达到 60 帧/秒,《源氏冲击》甚至支持令人印象深刻的 120 帧/秒。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
暗黑破坏神:不朽
暗黑破坏神:不朽
No graph data

排放 - 更好地控制废热

温度

我们的目的是确定Apple iPhone 15 Pro 是否会遇到与温度有关的问题,并进行了一项涉及长时间复杂 CPU 计算的 Linpack 基准测试。

在 3DMark 压力测试的长时间负载中,我们记录到的最大性能损失为 15%。考虑到处理器的高功率水平,这在日常使用中应该不会太明显。鉴于处理器的高能耗水平,在日常使用中几乎不会出现明显的性能损失。

Max. Load
 39.6 °C40.6 °C37.6 °C 
 42 °C42.1 °C38.1 °C 
 42.1 °C43 °C38.2 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 40.4 °C
38.4 °C40.3 °C36.8 °C
38.2 °C40.7 °C39.5 °C
38 °C41.9 °C43.4 °C
Maximum: 43.4 °C
Average: 39.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.6 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
84.9 %
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.1 % -2%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
82 % -3%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.6 % -19%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 % -39%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
95.9 %
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.2 % -8%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
68 % -29%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.8 % -44%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % -47%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
88.9 %
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
62.8 % -29%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.4 (16-16.7)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø15 (13.7-20.2)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø21.1 (19.4-22)
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø15.8 (11.4-22.1)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15.5 (12.4-23.1)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.5 (50-58.9)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø53.3 (48.7-59.4)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73.8 (64.6-77.7)
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø54 (40.8-78.5)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (52.3-76.3)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø57.9 (54.7-74.4)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø66.7 (56-85.8)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø8.18 (6.88-12.1)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.6 (14.8-16.7)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø9.23 (7.89-12.6)

发言人

iPhone 15 Pro 支持专用扬声器和耳机,在聆听音乐时能带来相当不错的音频体验。另一方面,高频有时容易被过分强调,导致耳朵发出令人不悦的响声。稍微降低音量会使声音更加平衡,从而提高语音清晰度。

在无线连接方面,该设备使用Apple 的 AAC,这意味着高分辨率编解码器不能用于 iPhone 的蓝牙连接。

耳机和扬声器现在可以通过 USB-C 连接,Apple ,相应的 EarPods 售价为 19 美元。不过,使用老式耳机的用户可能需要一个新配件,因为某些第三方 USB-C 至 3.5 毫米插孔适配器可能不兼容。Apple 提供了一条兼容电缆,售价约为 10 美元。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.841.1253737.33131.730.84032.537.85036.439.36328.926.88024.423.310023.735.612524.144.216020.150.820013.650.825012.652.131512.754.340011.256.950013.564.163014.765.48001465100013.667.6125012.669.216001169.9200010.869250011.570.5315013.870.440001565.5500015.663630016.260.7800017.259.91000017.8651250017.158.31600017.847.5SPL26.779.4N0.844.4median 14median 63Delta2.47.9334230.933.519.43327.335.4374026.937.31938.418.439.11542.116.152.715.953.114.258.912.163.11463.714.773.11577.513.781.714.18113.676.513.174.912.876.113.378.713.477.813.879.81478.314.178.113.575.813.774.513.670.713.165.92689.90.785.5median 13.8median 75.80.77.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone 15 ProSony Xperia 5 V
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia 5 V audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池使用时间 - 续航能力强的 iPhone

15 Pro 是一款高能效智能手机,其耗电量尤其体现在执行密集型任务时:

当电池电量耗尽时,iPhone 的充电功率可高达 20 瓦,现在有了 USB-C 端口,使用各种第三方充电器充电的速度会更快。将 iPhone 15 Pro 充满电大约需要 1 小时 40 分钟。

iPhone 15 Pro 支持通过 MagSafe 无线充电,最大功率可达 15 瓦,通过 Qi 无线充电最大功率可达 7.5 瓦。它还具有反向充电功能。

耗电量


Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 0.9 / 1.1 Watt
Load midlight 6 / 10.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
3274 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
3200 mAh
Xiaomi 13 Pro
4820 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 V
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh
Average Apple A17 Pro
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
5%
-15%
-11%
26%
-53%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.56
20%
1.02
-46%
0.79
-13%
0.57
19%
0.717 ?(0.5 - 0.95, n=3)
-2%
Idle Average *
0.9
1.37
-52%
1.36
-51%
1.08
-20%
0.74
18%
2.21 ?(0.9 - 3.76, n=3)
-146%
Idle Maximum *
1.1
1.42
-29%
1.58
-44%
1.12
-2%
0.83
25%
2.29 ?(1.1 - 3.79, n=3)
-108%
Load Average *
6
3.42
43%
4.29
28%
7.93
-32%
4.26
29%
Load Maximum *
10.1
5.56
45%
6.15
39%
8.78
13%
6.16
39%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Apple iPhone 15 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.41 (0.841-10.4)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.745 (0.675-1.008)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Apple iPhone 15 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.64 (5.12-6.05)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.745 (0.675-1.008)

电池寿命

尽管 iPhone 15 Pro 的电池容量只有 3,274 毫安时,但它的续航时间却令人印象深刻。在我们的 WLAN 测试中,它的续航时间长达 13 小时 52 分钟,满载情况下的续航时间超过 6 小时。值得注意的是,2023 iPhone Pro 在各种场景下都表现出了超长电池续航时间的显著一致性,总体上超过了许多竞争对手。

在典型的日常使用场景中,电池可以轻松持续一整天。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
45h 14min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
25h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 02min
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
3274 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
3200 mAh
Xiaomi 13 Pro
4820 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 V
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
-22%
4%
-6%
Reader / Idle
2714
2659
-2%
1509
-44%
2788
3%
2249
-17%
H.264
1522
1397
-8%
1263
-17%
1493
-2%
1255
-18%
WiFi v1.3
832
807
-3%
846
2%
952
14%
926
11%
Load
362
351
-3%
254
-30%
371
2%
370
2%

Pros

+ 耐用外壳
+ 上市价格低于前代产品
+ 快速可靠的 Wi-Fi 连接
+ IP 防水防尘认证
+ 处理能力强
+ 多功能摄像头设置
+ 明亮的显示屏,色彩还原准确
+ 精确的 GPS 功能
+ 全球兼容性
+ 高速 USB-C 端口
+ 自定义快捷按钮

Cons

- 不支持 WiFi 7
- 充电速度慢
- 附带的数据线仅支持 usb 2.0
- 蓝牙音频仅限于 aac 编解码器
- 保修 12 个月

评语:钛金属 iPhone,雄心勃勃

测试Apple iPhone 15 Pro。
测试Apple iPhone 15 Pro。

Apple iPhone 15 Pro 不仅是 2023 年最昂贵、最令人期待的智能手机之一,而且还引发了激烈的争论:有人声称性能节流 ,也有人质疑其外壳的强度 。在使用 iOS 17.0.3 进行的测试中,这款Apple 手机的性能表现令人钦佩,而且跳频现象极少。

外壳看起来非常别致,并成功通过了初步的 耐用性测试iPhone 15 Pro Max.
不过,就日常耐用性而言,铝制 iPhone 15 可能更有韧性。 更耐用.

当然,值得称赞的是,Apple ,iPhone 15 Pro 的价格比上一代产品有所下降。

此外,iPhone 15 Pro 的相机系统功能强大,具有高效的光学变焦和出色的图像稳定性。此外,iPhone 15 Pro 现在支持 WiFi 6E,数据传输速率大大提高,速度稳定性也得到了改善。虽然这是一个积极的举措,但值得注意的是,其他一些公司已经采用了 WiFi 7 技术。

灵活的操作按钮可作为警报滑块的多功能替代品,而鲜艳的 6.1 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏则以出色的图像再现令人信服,尽管它还没有完全摆脱 PWM 闪烁的困扰。

iPhone 15 Pro 仍是今年最顶级的智能手机之一,在Apple 的封闭生态系统中提供了卓越的性能和功能。

选择 iPhone 15 意味着放弃全时显示屏、全新 GPU 和操作按钮,并在光学变焦方面做出妥协。作为回报,选择 iPhone 15 可以节省约 265 美元。对于那些愿意选择Android 的人来说,三星Galaxy S23 值得考虑,它拥有明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕和快速充电功能。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

iPhone 15 Pro 目前只能从以下网站直接购买Apple直接购买,交货日期为 11 月中旬,起价为 999 美元。

Apple iPhone 15 Pro - 11/03/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
66 / 70 → 94%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
95%
Games Performance
66 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
92 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
81%
Average
85%
91%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple iPhone 15 Pro 智能手机评测--替代 PlayStation 的高端手机?
Florian Schmitt, 2023-10-21 (Update: 2024-08-15)