Blackview AceBook 1笔记本电脑评论。适合低负荷使用,但其他方面不尽人意
一个月前刚刚发布的 就在一个月前,AceBook1是黑视的第一台Windows笔记本电脑,这意味着它的性能有很大的影响,有可能启动一系列不同的模型。该公司因其廉价的耐用Android 智能手机系列而闻名,如具有5G功能的BL5000模型。
14英寸的AceBook1笔记本电脑更为朴实,其低调的赛扬N4120处理器、4GB内存和微薄的128GB固态硬盘,在销售时将价格控制在500美元或400美元以下。这个领域的竞争者包括其他价格低廉的副笔记本,如 楚威CoreBook X,英菲尼克斯INBook X1 Pro, Honor MagicBook 14, 或泰可拉斯F7 Air.
更多关于Blackview的评论。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
74.2 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Blackview AceBook 1 Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600 | 1.3 kg | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
79 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Chuwi CoreBook X i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 1.5 kg | 20.6 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
80.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.5 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
75.4 % v7 (old) | Teclast F7 Air Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600 | 1.2 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
78.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 1.6 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
案例
金属底座和盖子是AceBook 1的主要亮点。在视觉上,该系统看起来与流行的预算和中档超极本一样好,如 华硕VivoBook戴尔Inspiron,或惠普Pavilion ,这些产品的零售价往往更高。底座的刚性也比预期的要好;扭动底座或盖子会导致没有吱吱作响,只有轻微的翘起。
整体尺寸和重量非常接近Infinix INBook X1或Honor MagicBook 14。该系统有可能在长度上更小,因为其底部边框仍然相当厚。
连接性
对于这样一台廉价的笔记本电脑来说,有很多的端口。USB-C和3个USB-A端口可能足以满足大多数家庭用户的需求。USB-C端口支持DisplayPort和Power Delivery,这意味着用户可以通过第三方USB-C适配器连接外部显示器和充电。
SD卡阅读器
从我们的UHS-II测试卡向桌面传输1GB的图片非常慢,超过50秒。此外,插入和弹出MicroSD卡可能很麻烦,因为卡是平放在边缘的。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X (AV PRO V60) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro (AV Pro V60) | |
Teclast F7 Air (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Blackview AceBook 1 (AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro (AV Pro V60) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X (AV PRO V60) | |
Teclast F7 Air (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Blackview AceBook 1 (AV Pro V60) |
沟通
无线网络很慢,但其他方面很稳定,可以进行可靠的浏览和视频流。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Teclast F7 Air |
网络摄像头
720p的网络摄像头很差,就像大多数其他笔记本电脑上一样。然而,AceBook 1的情况更糟糕,因为颜色看起来比正常情况下要暖和得多。没有网络摄像头快门,也没有与Windows Hello兼容。
维护
用户可以维修M.2 2280 SSD或2个SODIMM插槽。WLAN模块在铜板下面,它可能是焊接的。
配件和保修
零售包装盒只包括文件和一个欧式交流适配器。标准的一年有限保修期适用,但买家必须支付运费。
输入设备
键盘
打字的体验是不合格的,因为按键很浅,反馈很弱。空格键和回车键比其他键更响亮、更硬,感觉不均匀。
触摸板
Precision 启用的点击板比XPS 13上的点击板要大。 XPS 13(12 x 6.8 cm vs. 11.2 x 6.5 cm),理论上应该更容易进行光标控制和多点触摸输入。不幸的是,情况并非如此,其略微粗糙的表面非常粘稠。用手指滑过应该感觉毫不费力,但在AceBook 1上几乎是累人的。屏幕上的光标甚至倾向于弹跳,使准确的点击变得令人沮丧。只要有可能,你就会想要一个外部鼠标。
显示
考虑到价格,14英寸的IPS显示屏还不错。虽然颜色很窄,但对比度很好,亮度也很好,足以满足舒适的室内使用。请注意,在25%及以下的亮度水平上会出现闪烁,这可能会导致少数用户的眼睛疲劳。
这款 Chuwi CoreBook X和Honor Magicbook 14都有更好、更准确的显示屏,但它们的零售价也更贵一些。
|
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 249.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1470:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.72
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
Blackview AceBook 1 Panda 1402L01, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Chuwi CoreBook X Chi Mei P140ZKA-BZ1, IPS, 14", 2160x1440 | Infinix INBook X1 Pro BOE NV140FHM-N62, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 BOE092E, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Teclast F7 Air IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 LG Philips LP140WFA-SPD1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 60% | 48% | 55% | 10% | -9% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.6 | 67.2 62% | 65.7 58% | 64.8 56% | 45.57 10% | 37.76 -9% |
sRGB Coverage | 62.4 | 98 57% | 86.6 39% | 96.3 54% | 68.7 10% | 56.6 -9% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43 | 68.8 60% | 63.3 47% | 66.1 54% | 47.08 9% | 39.05 -9% |
Response Times | 1613% | -22% | 12% | 127% | -11% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30.8 ? | 36.4 ? -18% | 43.2 ? -40% | 31.2 ? -1% | 32.4 ? -5% | 39 ? -27% |
Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 26.4 ? -3% | 32 ? -25% | 19.2 ? 25% | 28.4 ? -11% | 24 ? 6% |
PWM Frequency | 201.6 ? | 10000 ? 4860% | 200 ? -1% | 1000 ? 396% | ||
Screen | -27% | -52% | 15% | -83% | -54% | |
Brightness middle | 249.9 | 355.3 42% | 282 13% | 341 36% | 235.6 -6% | 292 17% |
Brightness | 226 | 344 52% | 271 20% | 313 38% | 234 4% | 260 15% |
Brightness Distribution | 80 | 94 18% | 74 -7% | 87 9% | 78 -2% | 80 0% |
Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.34 -100% | 0.24 -41% | 0.27 -59% | 0.46 -171% | 0.36 -112% |
Contrast | 1470 | 1045 -29% | 1175 -20% | 1263 -14% | 512 -65% | 811 -45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.89 | 6.2 -59% | 6.1 -57% | 1.76 55% | 9.43 -142% | 6.92 -78% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.39 | 10.96 33% | 14.05 14% | 4.85 70% | 13.5 18% | 19.36 -18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.72 | 1.23 28% | 3.94 -129% | 1.01 41% | 3.82 -122% | 5.13 -198% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 7.9 -229% | 8.7 -263% | 3.3 -38% | 8.7 -263% | 3.94 -64% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.02 109% | 2.14 103% | 2.26 97% | 1.983 111% | 2.83 78% |
CCT | 6772 96% | 7450 87% | 8672 75% | 7233 90% | 8137 80% | 6737 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66 | 44 | 36 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 69 | 56 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 549% /
318% | -9% /
-26% | 27% /
23% | 18% /
-23% | -25% /
-38% |
* ... smaller is better
色彩覆盖率仅限于sRGB的62%,这表明是一个预算面板。大多数价格较高的超极本覆盖95%以上的sRGB,颜色更深更准确。
令我们惊讶的是,显示屏开箱后的校准效果不错,这对廉价笔记本电脑来说是不寻常的。平均灰度和色彩deltaE值分别为2.4和3.89。蓝色似乎比其他颜色表现得更不准确。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 201.6 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
如果在户外工作,预计会出现眩光和洗出的颜色。即使在阴凉处,显示屏的亮度也不足以减轻环境光线的不利影响。
业绩
ǞǞǞ 赛扬N4120是一种被动冷却的处理器,通常出现在非常便宜的笔记本电脑上,包括那些不太知名的制造商,如Chuwi。它的排名远远低于酷睿i3笔记本电脑,仅略高于Atom系列,只适合于要求不高的浏览或文字处理任务,是一个合格的解决方案。
处理器
原始的CPU性能与Core m3-6Y30在五年前的 MacBook 12.即使是入门级的第十代 酷睿i3-1005G1在大多数情况下,可以运行至少快两倍。这毕竟是一台被动冷却的机器。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (223 - 234, n=3) | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA | |
HP mt21 | |
XIDU PhilBook Max | |
HP Stream 14-ax002ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (73 - 74.5, n=3) | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
HP mt21 | |
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air | |
XIDU PhilBook Max | |
HP Stream 14-ax002ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (376 - 516, n=3) | |
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA | |
XIDU PhilBook Max |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (159 - 166, n=3) | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air | |
XIDU PhilBook Max |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (965 - 1253, n=3) | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (409 - 424, n=2) | |
Blackview AceBook 1 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
XIDU PhilBook Max | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA | |
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (2558 - 2583, n=2) | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (2145 - 2412, n=3) | |
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
XIDU PhilBook Max |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (5832 - 7436, n=3) | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA | |
XIDU PhilBook Max |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (438 - 449, n=3) | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (1505 - 1561, n=3) | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (1.02 - 1.38, n=3) | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA | |
XIDU PhilBook Max |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (131 - 157, n=3) | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA | |
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120 (1.642 - 1.649, n=3) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 |
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
PCMark的结果甚至落后于最慢的上一代Core i3笔记本电脑,如联想V17.这种差异足够大,以至于在浏览Windows或在应用程序之间进行多任务处理时有明显的延迟。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
HP mt21 | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120, Intel UHD Graphics 600 (1671 - 1801, n=2) | |
Blackview AceBook 1 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120, Intel UHD Graphics 600 (4599 - 5005, n=2) | |
HP mt21 | |
Blackview AceBook 1 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
HP mt21 | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120, Intel UHD Graphics 600 (2813 - 2833, n=2) | |
Teclast F7 Air |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
HP mt21 | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Average Intel Celeron N4120, Intel UHD Graphics 600 (973 - 1126, n=2) | |
Blackview AceBook 1 |
PCMark 10 Score | 1671 points | |
Help |
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的DPC延迟问题。此外,在60 FPS下的4K视频播放并不完美,因为我们在长达一分钟的视频中能够记录到26个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试装置配备了不常见的SCY C500 M.2 SATA III 2280固态硬盘,因为该系统不支持PCIe 3或NVMe驱动器。连续读取和写入率在同类产品中是不错的,分别为550MB/s和430MB/s左右。然而,用户可能会很快达到128GB的容量。
Blackview AceBook 1 SCY C500 SNS1N3G12800D M.2 SATA | Chuwi CoreBook X Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Infinix INBook X1 Pro Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13 | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Teclast F7 Air faspeed K7N8-256G | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 262% | 322% | 591% | 24% | 177% | |
Seq Read | 446.6 | 1393 212% | 2135 378% | 3021 576% | 430.2 -4% | 1535 244% |
Seq Write | 276.8 | 954 245% | 1776 542% | 2341 746% | 412.3 49% | 1215 339% |
4K Read | 8.95 | 39.51 341% | 28.88 223% | 47.9 435% | 13.21 48% | 35.93 301% |
4K Write | 50.2 | 98.9 97% | 147.9 195% | 186.7 272% | 50.1 0% | 138.3 175% |
4K-64 Read | 145 | 834 475% | 712 391% | 1472 915% | 122.9 -15% | 467.7 223% |
4K-64 Write | 173.5 | 687 296% | 643 271% | 1829 954% | 215.6 24% | 399.6 130% |
Access Time Read * | 0.5 | 0.066 87% | 0.052 90% | 0.06 88% | 0.151 70% | 0.104 79% |
Access Time Write * | 0.232 | 0.044 81% | 0.092 60% | 0.021 91% | 0.17 27% | 0.029 87% |
Score Read | 199 | 1013 409% | 954 379% | 1822 816% | 179 -10% | 657 230% |
Score Write | 251 | 881 251% | 968 286% | 2249 796% | 307 22% | 659 163% |
Score Total | 545 | 2399 340% | 2395 339% | 4973 812% | 581 7% | 1647 202% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 360.9 | 983 172% | 1296 259% | 440.8 22% | 754 109% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 115.1 | 643 459% | 900 682% | 193.4 68% | 253.1 120% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 306.8 | 920 200% | 1588 418% | 396.8 29% | 546 78% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 172% | 338% | 471% | 5% | 226% | |
Write 4K | 66.3 | 130.5 97% | 228.3 244% | 223.7 237% | 75 13% | 173.1 161% |
Read 4K | 26.3 | 38.72 47% | 60.7 131% | 51.2 95% | 27.31 4% | 49.32 88% |
Write Seq | 231.9 | 709 206% | 1895 717% | 2579 1012% | 1188 412% | |
Read Seq | 466.8 | 717 54% | 1573 237% | 2553 447% | 1278 174% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 117.3 | 510 335% | 476.6 306% | 671 472% | 120.1 2% | 457.4 290% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 138.1 | 554 301% | 592 329% | 761 451% | 135.2 -2% | 505 266% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 427.6 | 1037 143% | 2136 400% | 2721 536% | 469.2 10% | 1258 194% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 546 | 1609 195% | 2413 342% | 3358 515% | 555 2% | 1742 219% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 264.6 | |||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 135.6 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 217% /
229% | 330% /
328% | 531% /
540% | 15% /
18% | 202% /
195% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
的。 UHD Graphics 600的速度比已经很慢的 UHD Graphics 620.这更像是一台浏览和1080p流媒体机器,而不是一台本地游戏机。
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
HP mt21 | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600 (410 - 854, n=27) | |
HP Stream 14-ax002ng | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
HP mt21 | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600 (362 - 983, n=27) | |
HP Stream 14-ax002ng |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
HP mt21 | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600 (2346 - 4958, n=20) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
HP mt21 | |
Teclast F7 Air | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600 (307 - 637, n=21) | |
XIDU PhilBook Max |
3DMark 11 Performance | 658 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3128 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 404 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 37.4 | 15.3 | 7.9 | 7.2 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 6.35 | 4.18 | 3.79 |
Emissions
系统噪音
虽然从技术上讲,由于无风扇设计,我们的设备在运行3DMark 06或Prime95等高负荷时,有时会出现明显的线圈啸叫或电子噪音。这也会在视频流时发生,但程度不明显。非常响亮的线圈啸叫可能表明内部元件更便宜。
温度
无论屏幕上的负载如何,表面温度都不会过高。我们能够在键盘中心记录到最高35摄氏度的温度,而竞争者的键盘中心为42摄氏度至50摄氏度。 英菲尼克斯INBook X1 Pro.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.6 °C / 78.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+2.7 °C / 4.8 F).
压力测试
当运行Prime95时,CPU会在最初的10秒左右提升到2.3GHz,直到核心温度达到80℃。此后,CPU会下降并稳定在2GHz和82℃。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 40 |
Prime95压力 | 2.0 | -- | 82 |
发言人
集成的扬声器就其尺寸而言是比较响亮的,但质量是尖锐的。我们的麦克风显示了一个狭窄的粉红噪声曲线,代表低音再现不佳和范围狭窄。因此,这些扬声器更适合用于虚拟会议而不是多媒体播放。
Blackview AceBook 1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management
消耗功率
在运行高负荷时,该系统将从小型(约7.3 x 4.3 x 3.2厘米)交流适配器中最多消耗20瓦,而搭载Core ix的笔记本电脑则是这一数值的两倍多。在更典型的工作负载下,用户可以期待个位数的瓦特。低消耗率是以下记录的长电池寿命的原因。
Off / Standby | 1.6 / 1.7 Watt |
Idle | 3.5 / 5.6 / 6.2 Watt |
Load |
8.3 / 19.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Blackview AceBook 1 Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600, SCY C500 SNS1N3G12800D M.2 SATA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Chuwi CoreBook X i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Teclast F7 Air Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600, faspeed K7N8-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -152% | -186% | -128% | -78% | -87% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 6.2 -77% | 5 -43% | 4 -14% | 6.7 -91% | 3.2 9% |
Idle Average * | 5.6 | 10.7 -91% | 11.5 -105% | 6 -7% | 9.6 -71% | 6.2 -11% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.2 | 12.5 -102% | 12 -94% | 10 -61% | 9.9 -60% | 7.2 -16% |
Load Average * | 8.3 | 40.5 -388% | 48.7 -487% | 34 -310% | 19.1 -130% | 30 -261% |
Load Maximum * | 19.6 | 39.2 -100% | 58.8 -200% | 68 -247% | 27.1 -38% | 50 -155% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.4 | 46.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Prime95
电池寿命
运行时间很长,9.5小时的实际WLAN使用时间可以与Honor MagicBook 14相媲美。然而,充电非常慢,从空电到满电需要4个小时。
Blackview AceBook 1 Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600, 45 Wh | Chuwi CoreBook X i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, 46.2 Wh | Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 55 Wh | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Teclast F7 Air Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600, 32.725 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 35 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -29% | -10% | 3% | -54% | -36% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 565 | 400 -29% | 508 -10% | 580 3% | 262 -54% | 359 -36% |
Load | 107 |
Pros
Cons
判决书
对一台400美元以下的笔记本电脑期望太高是不现实的。然而,最起码,这类机型应该能够顺利地运行Windows 10和所有常见的应用程序。这里的赛扬N4120甚至难以跟上浏览器和视频之间的轻度多任务处理,整体速度缓慢,有时令人沮丧的用户体验。
缓慢的系统性能和粘稠的点击板使这台无害的、构造合理的副笔记本大打折扣。
AceBook 1的几个方面也需要一些更新。特别是粘稠的点击板和响亮的线圈啸叫,对于寻求安静和舒适的副笔记本的用户来说,可能会成为交易的障碍。
长的电池寿命,广泛的端口选择,以及有吸引力的金属骨架,都是Blackview有史以来第一台笔记本电脑的良好起点,但在我们推荐AceBook 1超过更成熟的预算模型之前,还有很多事情需要做,例如 笔记本 X, 笔记本X1, 魔法书14, 或 IdeaPad 14.
价格和可用性
Blackview现在正在销售淘宝网直接销售AceBook 1,售价为499美元,打折时为389美元。
Blackview AceBook 1
- 08/12/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo