Blackview Tab 12 Pro 评测 - 配备双 SIM 卡和高达 14GB RAM 的 4G 平板电脑，售价低于 170 欧元（约合 185 美元）
以户外产品闻名的中国制造商 Blackview 推出了 Tab 12 Pro 平板电脑，将自己定位在入门级到经济型中端市场。型号名称中的数字并不代表屏幕对角线。Tab 12 Pro 只有一块 10.1 英寸的 IPS 屏幕，分辨率高达 1920 x 1200 像素。
在评测期间，Blackview Tab 12 Pro 的售价约为 130 至 170 欧元（约合 140 至 185 美元）。鉴于给定的配置和 8 GB 内存（可扩展至 6 GB 虚拟工作内存）以及 128 GB 系统内存，价格低廉的Android-12 平板电脑与 Unisoc Tiger T606似乎具有很高的性价比。请阅读我们的测试是否能证实这一点。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Blackview Tab 12 Pro T7200, Mali-G57 MP1 | 430 g | 7.4 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
| 80.8 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Blackview Tab 13 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 450 g | 7.7 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
| 81.5 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Nokia T21 T7225, Mali-G52 MP1 | 466 g | 7.5 mm | 10.36" | 2000x1200 | |
| 81.8 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Teclast T50 T7255, Mali-G57 MP1 | 510 g | 9.7 mm | 11.00" | 2000x1200 | |
| 80 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 T610, Mali-G52 MP2 | 460 g | 8.5 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 |
案例 - 略有缺陷的 Blackview Tab 12 Pro
Tab 12 Pro 采用金属外壳，为这款价格低廉的 10.1 英寸平板电脑增添了几分质感。不过，它看起来并不特别抗扭，而且在我们评测的样品左侧，IPS 面板与边框之间的距离很小。除此之外，Blackview Tab 的做工还算可以，430 克（约 15 盎司）的重量也让人感觉手感舒适。
除了银色版本，Tab 12 Pro 还有蓝色和灰色两种颜色可供选择。这款入门级平板电脑的正面屏占比为 78.7%，屏幕与总表面的比例相当低。中国制造商没有说明 Blackview 安装了哪种保护玻璃。
功能 - 带 3.5 毫米插孔的 Blackview 平板电脑
尽管价格低廉，但 Tab 12 Pro 的功能却相当丰富。除了双扬声器系统、4G 双卡双待、状态指示灯、FM 收音机和蓝牙 5.0 之外，Tab 12 Pro 还配备了 UFS 2.0 存储系统。UFS 2.0 存储空间还可通过 microSD 卡扩展至 1 TB。不出所料，Blackview 的入门级平板电脑采用了速度较慢的 USB 2.0 端口，无法进行高数据传输或有线图像输出。
microSD 读卡器
我们使用参考存储卡 Angelbird Pro V60 对内存插槽的速度进行了更深入的研究。虽然 CPDT 基准测试的结果不错，但 JPEG 复制测试的数据传输速率仅为 8 MB/s。此外，它还不支持 exFAT 文件系统。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Nokia T21 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Blackview Tab 13 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Teclast T50 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 - Tab 12 Pro，含Android 12
Blackview 将过时的Android-12 操作系统与内部用户界面 DokeOS 3.0 版相结合。在测试时，后者仍有 2022 年 11 月的安全补丁。目前尚不清楚未来是否会有操作系统升级，以及安全更新会持续多久。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 4G 功能的 Blackview Tab 12 Pro
Tab 12 Pro 支持接入移动 4G 网络，但只有 6 个 LTE 频段，包括本地使用的 28 频段。这款入门级平板电脑在国内无线局域网内提供 WiFi 5，与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用，平均传输速率超过 300 MBit/s。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
| Nokia T21 | |
| Teclast T50 | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Teclast T50 | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | |
| Nokia T21 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
除了与卫星系统通信的内置定位模块外：Tab 12 Pro 除了与 GPS、GLONASS 和 Galileo 卫星系统通信外，由于支持手机，还使用了 A-GPS。在我们的实际测试中，定位精度并不总是令人信服。与同时用于对比的 Garmin Venu 2 相比，Blackview 平板电脑的细节显示有一两处不准确。尽管如此，其跟踪水平应该足以胜任导航任务。
电话功能 - Tab 12 Pro 支持通话
喜欢用平板电脑拨打零星电话的用户可以通过 Blackview Tab 12 Pro 的电话应用程序拨打电话。不过，通话质量不是特别好。只要用户不直接对着麦克风说话，对方就会觉得声音非常小，几乎听不懂。
摄像头 - 配备单摄像头的 Tab 12 Pro
背面的单摄像头模块光圈为 f/2.2，并配有 LED 闪光灯。1300 万像素镜头和自动对焦功能可在白天提供可接受的画质，不过照片有时会显得非常明亮和有点柔和。不过，Tab 12 Pro 在色彩还原方面还是令人信服的，不过绿色调有时会有些偏淡。不过，在可控的光照条件下，与参考色相比，没有出现真正的异常值（>15）。
Blackview 平板电脑录制视频的最大分辨率为 1080p，而 500 万像素的 FroTCam 只能录制高清视频。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide AngleWide AngleLow LightZoom 5x
配件和保修 - Blackview 平板电脑（带电源适配器
Blackview 为其平板电脑配备了 10 瓦电源、保护膜、一个相当贵重的保护套以及 USB 电缆和信息手册。此外还有一些可选配件，如 Blackview K1 无线键盘（约 45 欧元/49 美元）。
保修 保修期 在德国的保修期为自购买之日起 12 个月。
输入设备和操作 - 带面部解锁功能的 Blackview Tab
电容式触摸屏最多可同时检测四个输入，识别手指时不会出现严重延迟。层压面板的工作频率仅为 60 Hz，这意味着动画看起来不如 90 Hz 或更高频率的屏幕流畅。
Tab 12 Pro 没有指纹传感器，但可以通过前置摄像头的面部识别功能进行生物认证。Blackview 最多能可靠地识别一张存储的人脸，但这种方法（2D 方法）很不安全，而且有一定的延迟。
显示屏 - 采用 IPS 面板的 Blackview Tab 12 Pro
10.1 英寸 IPS 面板的宽高比为 16:10，分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素。在我们的测量中，屏幕的最大亮度为 371 cd/m²，高于制造商的规格（300 nits），但提供的亮度并不高，照明也不均匀。APL18 测量结果也没有改变这一点--我们得到的亮度为 373 cd/m²。
Blackview 平板电脑没有使用脉宽调制进行亮度控制。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 371 cd/m²
Contrast: 773:1 (Black: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 11.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.04
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Blackview Tab 13 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Nokia T21 IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4" | Teclast T50 IPS, 2000x1200, 11" | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 28% | 17% | 26% | 21% | |
| Brightness middle | 371 | 344 -7% | 389 5% | 438 18% | 343 -8% |
| Brightness | 348 | 330 -5% | 382 10% | 417 20% | 332 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 93 13% | 94 15% | 85 4% | 94 15% |
| Black Level * | 0.48 | 0.27 44% | 0.57 -19% | 0.5 -4% | 0.31 35% |
| Contrast | 773 | 1274 65% | 682 -12% | 876 13% | 1106 43% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.6 | 5.32 38% | 4.93 43% | 4.37 49% | 5.9 31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.4 | 11.27 27% | 8.53 45% | 7.48 51% | 11.2 27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.3 | 6.2 45% | 5.7 50% | 5.3 53% | 7.9 30% |
| Gamma | 2.04 108% | 2.106 104% | 2.073 106% | 2.322 95% | 2.184 101% |
| CCT | 9728 67% | 8023 81% | 8029 81% | 7855 83% | 9198 71% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1260 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 1260 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 1260 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在我们使用 CalMAN 软件和分光光度计进行的测试中，IPS 显示屏的校准效果不佳，灰阶显示出明显的偏蓝。色彩的 Delta E 值明显高于理想范围（<3），色温也设置得过低，约为 9700K。
由于 0.48 cd/m² 的黑色值相当高，Tab 12 Pro 的对比度只有约 770:1。APL 测量值（0.49 cd/m²）也无助于提高 10.1 英寸平板电脑的对比度。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.97 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.45 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.52 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.57 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24.64 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
在户外，Blackview Tab 并没有给人留下令人信服的印象，尤其是亮度始终需要手动调节。在盛夏的阳光下，显示内容已难以辨认，但 Tab 12 Pro 在阴暗处也会出现恼人的反光。
另一方面，IPS 面板的可视角度令人信服，平视时典型的亮度下降也只是微妙地出现。
性能 - Blackview 平板电脑采用非同一般的 UNISOC SoC
在日常使用中，Tab 12 Pro 的运行并不流畅，轻微的卡顿现象时有发生。安装的 UNISOC T606在 1200p 分辨率下常常显得有些力不从心。在我们的基准软件包中，12 nm SoC 在此价格范围内显示出稳定的性能，但 Mali-G57 MP1在 3DMark 测试中的表现比 Teclast T50在 3DMark 测试中的表现不如采用相同 GPU 的 Teclast T50。由于应用程序的问题，我们无法提供 GFXBench 的数值。
| Antutu v9 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (202973 - 238808, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
| Nokia T21 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Teclast T50 | |
| Nokia T21 | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (6637 - 8303, n=19) | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | |
| CrossMark - Overall | |
| Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia T21 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (339 - 362, n=5) | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia T21 | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (2678 - 3748, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
| Teclast T50 | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | |
| Nokia T21 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
| Teclast T50 | |
| Nokia T21 | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
| Teclast T50 | |
| Nokia T21 | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
| Teclast T50 | |
| Nokia T21 | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
| Nokia T21 | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
| Nokia T21 | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
| Nokia T21 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (38.1 - 52.9, n=8) | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro (Chrome 115) | |
| Nokia T21 (Chrome 108.0.5359.79) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111) | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (51 - 56, n=7) | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro (Chrome 115) | |
| Nokia T21 (Chrome 108.0.5359.79) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Teclast T50 (Chrome 112) | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro (Chrome 115) | |
| Nokia T21 (Chrome 108.0.5359.79) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111) | |
| Blackview Tab 13 (Chrome 109) | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (2228 - 13455, n=14) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro (Chrome 115) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111) | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (2904 - 3187, n=7) | |
| Nokia T21 (Chrome 108.0.5359.79) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro | Blackview Tab 13 | Nokia T21 | Teclast T50 | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -38% | -35% | 116% | -27% | -5% | 106% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 512.71 | 289.1 -44% | 266.46 -48% | 920.5 80% | 277.2 -46% | 530 ? 3% | 1045 ? 104% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 196.44 | 173.1 -12% | 195.53 0% | 713.4 263% | 210.4 7% | 212 ? 8% | 684 ? 248% |
| Random Read 4KB | 129.56 | 79 -39% | 78.85 -39% | 207.1 60% | 105.1 -19% | 130.6 ? 1% | 189.2 ? 46% |
| Random Write 4KB | 149.89 | 63.1 -58% | 71.2 -52% | 238.1 59% | 78.5 -48% | 101.2 ? -32% | 189.5 ? 26% |
排放 - Blackview Tab 12 Pro 保持冷静
温度
在空闲或负载情况下，Blackview 平板电脑的外壳都不会发热。在 3DMark 压力测试中，我们也无法证明性能发展有所下降，这意味着 联科 T606可以非常稳定地工作。
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
发言人
Tab 12 Pro 依靠两个扬声器，最大音量超过 91 分贝。我们的测量结果显示，这款入门级平板电脑的中音具有线性频率响应，但超高音调在粉红噪声中明显塌陷。声音图像中没有低音，在最大音量的上三分之一处会出现失真。
此外，还提供通过 3.5 毫米插孔和蓝牙 5.0 连接的有线或无线耳机解决方案。音频插孔的噪音水平在良好范围内，信噪比值约为 79 dBFS。音乐爱好者还可以信赖由 aptX、aptX HD、AAC 和 LDAC 组成的可靠编解码器。
Blackview Tab 12 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - Blackview Tab 12 Pro 平板电脑
能源消耗
这款入门级平板电脑的电池容量为 6,580 毫安时，可通过电缆以 10 瓦功率充电。使用附带的充电器可在约 3 小时内为储能电池充电。
闲置功耗仍有待优化。不过，作为一款 10.1 英寸平板电脑，Tab 12 Pro 的功耗相对较低，负载情况下约为 4 瓦。
| Off / Standby |   0.15 / 0.25 Watt |
| Idle |  0.98 / 3 / 3.14 Watt |
| Load |
4.19 / 7.73 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro 6580 mAh | Nokia T21 8200 mAh | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | -28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.98 | 1.2 -22% | 1.9 -94% |
| Idle Average * | 3 | 1.8 40% | 2.1 30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.14 | 2.5 20% | 2.5 20% |
| Load Average * | 4.19 | 4.8 -15% | 7.6 -81% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.73 | 9.9 -28% | 9 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，Blackview 平板电脑在调整显示屏亮度为 150cd/m2 的情况下可持续使用约 13.5 小时。这是一个不错的成绩，但在我们的比较中，入门级竞争产品的成绩要高出一筹。
| Blackview Tab 12 Pro 6580 mAh | Blackview Tab 13 7280 mAh | Nokia T21 8200 mAh | Teclast T50 7500 mAh | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 817 | 926 13% | 929 14% | 903 11% | 861 5% |
Pros
Cons
判决
来自 Blackview 的 Tab 12 Pro 以极其诱人的价格提供了坚实的优点，却没有暴露出任何明显的弱点。金属外壳看起来并不廉价，但也不耐磨耐用。凭借集成的 LTE 调制解调器和双 SIM 卡功能，这款 10.1 英寸平板电脑不受国内无线局域网的影响，而且良好的电池续航能力也让户外娱乐变得持久。不过，缺少环境光传感器是户外使用的一个缺点。
Blackview Tab 12 Pro 的低廉价格和 4G 网络接入为购买提供了理由。
不支持外接显示器或校准不理想也是该机的不足之处，尽管考虑到价格，这些不足还是可以原谅的。另一方面，软件方面的问题更大。旧的Android 12 和更旧的安全更新并不一定适合购买 Tab 12 Pro。那些看重更新保证和（更长时间的）安全补丁支持的用户，可以通过以下产品找到更好的解决方案 诺基亚 T21 - 但诺基亚 Tab 的价格也高出很多。还有一款非常便宜的 联想 Tab M10 2022（第三代）可能）比 Blackview Tab 12 Pro 更有前途。
价格和供应情况
Blackview Tab 12 Pro 在美国亚马逊上的售价约为 140 美元。
Blackview Tab 12 Pro
- 08/21/2023 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
