摩托罗拉Edge 40 Pro评论:拥有165赫兹显示屏的高端智能手机,价格合理
摩托罗拉的Edge Pro自两年前推出第一款Pro型号以来,已经取得了长足的进步,即Edge 20 Pro,它以699欧元(约850美元)的竞争性价格起价。这款手机 边缘30专业版去年的价格是100欧元(100美元),Edge 40 Pro今年的价格也大幅上涨,为899欧元(约990美元)。
在同一时间,Edge 30 Pro在许多方面都优于其前辈。如果Edge 40 Pro再次显示出在同样多的方面的改进,尽管价格上涨,它可能值得考虑。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Motorola Edge 40 Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 199 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
87.9 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Motorola Edge 30 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 196 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
89.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Xiaomi 13 Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 229 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.73" | 3200x1440 | |
90.1 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Honor Magic5 Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 219 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.81" | 2848x1312 | |
88.7 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15, A15 GPU 5-Core | 203 g | 128 GB NVMe | 6.70" | 2778x1284 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 闪亮的背面
摩托罗拉Edge系列的智能手机可以通过圆角来识别,正面和背面在侧面汇合,形成一个狭窄的铝制框架。Edge 40 Pro也不例外,磨砂玻璃背面也出现了。然而,这一次,它略显粗糙,在灯光下闪闪发光。
大猩猩玻璃Victus提供了必要的稳定性,而且这款智能手机还获得了IP68认证,即对水的保护。因此,它可以在浅水中生存几分钟而不受到损害。
总的来说,这款智能手机看起来很结实,但中间会有一点凹陷,这稍微降低了质量印象。否则,它的制造工艺非常简洁,材料过渡流畅,符合人体工程学原理。
摩托罗拉提供深灰色和浅蓝色作为颜色变体。摩托罗拉Edge 40 Pro的重量不到200克,就其尺寸而言是一款非常轻的手机。它也比它的前辈更紧凑几毫米,尽管在日常使用中你很难注意到这种差异。
设备--USB接口也是一个DisplayPort接口
以不到1000美元的价格,摩托罗拉手机配备了12GB的内存和256GB的UFS 4.0闪存,这是如今高端手机的通常装备。
乍一看,USB-C端口很讨人喜欢,因为摩托罗拉在数据表中说这是一个USB 3.2速端口。然而,由于USB联盟的命名完全混乱,它的速度只相当于一个USB 3.0端口。作为安慰,它至少可以根据DisplayPort 1.4标准输出图片信号并通过OTG交换数据。
当然,用于无线支付交易的NFC和对电子SIM卡的支持也在其上。与Nano-SIM卡一起,你可以在该设备中使用总共两张SIM卡。然而,没有用于内存扩展的microSD读卡器。
软件--更新承诺至今未兑现
摩托罗拉传统上会在其智能手机上安装股票Android 。摩托罗拉Edge 40 Pro配备了Android 13。将会有多少操作系统更新还没有披露,但Android 14肯定是有的。
安全补丁是2023年2月的,因此在审查时已经过时了,这对一款高端手机来说特别令人尴尬。特别是由于摩托罗拉承诺每个月都有安全更新。这款智能手机应该在2027年4月之前收到安全补丁,这距离现在只有不到四年的时间。
手机上只有少数第三方应用程序,而且这些应用程序可以迅速删除。
像它的前辈一样,Edge 40 Pro支持摩托罗拉的Ready For 技术,该技术允许智能手机作为可能的PC替代品或与PC结合使用。它以无线方式或通过USB-C连接到屏幕,可以通过蓝牙连接到鼠标和键盘,并为此支持一个合适的桌面模式。这款手机还可以在大屏幕上镜像视频通话。
通信和GNSS - WLAN制动
WiFi 6E,即使用很少使用的6GHz频段进行WiFi的能力,被认为是高端手机的良好形式,摩托罗拉Edge 40 Pro在这里也不例外。制造商甚至承诺,这款智能手机将能够使用下一个WiFi 7标准。
然而,在我们与华硕ROG Rapture AXE 11000参考路由器的实际测试中,Edge 40 Pro并没有真正令人印象深刻。速度绝对不慢,约为800MBit/s,而且也相对稳定,但智能手机,如小米13 Pro或 Honor 魔术5 Pro达到了这些速度的两倍。
当然,Edge 40 Pro是一款5G手机,可以在全球使用。无论是在室内还是室外,信号质量始终与测试中的其他高端设备持平,总体上非常强大。
Networking | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus | |
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus | |
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1902, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro |
走出门外后,智能手机需要两秒钟就能将自己定位到3米的精度。摩托罗拉Edge 40 Pro依靠GPS、伽利略、格洛纳斯和北斗系统进行定位,而不是SBAS系统。在我们的测试中发现了大量的卫星。
为了确定智能手机的实际追踪能力,我们去骑自行车,还带了Garmin Venu 2智能手表进行比较。
总的来说,摩托罗拉Edge 40 Pro在开阔的地形和狭窄的老城区街道上都表现得相当好,只显示出轻微的不准确。因此,这款智能手机很适合用于日常导航。
电话和语音质量--麦克风有些发闷
拨打电话时,如果需要,听筒可以变得非常响亮,但附近的其他人可能会听到所说的一切。麦克风可以清晰地传递我们的声音,但有点儿闷。
我们对话伙伴的声音也可以通过扬声器和免提麦克风非常响亮地再现出来。我们的声音在这里也听起来有点闷,但对对方来说是可以理解的。
照相机 - 没有潜望镜变焦
摩托罗拉在其高端智能手机中并没有吝惜高分辨率的镜头。除了具有光学图像稳定功能的5000万像素主摄像头外,广角摄像头的分辨率也达到了5000万像素。用于极端特写的长焦相机仍有1200万像素,而作为打孔器集成在屏幕上的自拍相机也有6000万像素的惊人分辨率。
Edge 40 Pro没有配备潜望镜,即实际的光学变焦。相反,背面的3个镜头被巧妙地组合起来,根据情况使用。
主摄像头能拍出好的、色彩丰富的照片,尽管它还不能完全接近iPhone 14中的摄像头的丰富细节。周围环境的图像在细节上看起来有点浑浊,即使与其他Android 手机相比也是如此。另一方面,在弱光下,光学器件显示出它们的优势,即使细节上的锐度可以更好一点。
视频可以用全高清录制慢动作镜头,速度高达960帧,比30帧慢32倍。以高达30帧/秒的速度进行8K录制也是可能的。而在30帧的4K中,甚至HDR 10+视频也是可能的。来自摄像系统的影片看起来很棒,但亮度调节有时有点抖动,自动对焦也可以不时地更快、更精确。
前置摄像头可以拍摄高质量的自拍,即使在黑暗地区也有很多细节。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera - plantMain camera - surrounding environmentMain camera - low lightWide angle camera在摄影棚里,我们再次在固定的照明情况下试用了主相机。在这里,它在全光照下显示了一个干净、清晰和详细的图像。在仅为1勒克斯的强度下,图表和颜色仍然清晰可见,但诸如小文本等细节变得难以辨认。
配件和保修 - 24个月保修
除了充电器和相应的USB线以及SIM卡工具外,该智能手机还配有一个硅胶保护套。该智能手机的特殊配件目前在摩托罗拉的网上商店无法买到。
制造商在欧盟为该智能手机提供24个月的保修。这在其他国家和地区可能有所不同,所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。
输入设备和操作 - 非常流畅的输入
165赫兹的显示屏确保了滚动时屏幕上显示的图像和滚动本身都非常流畅。触摸屏对输入的反应高达360次/秒,可以很好地操作到边角。由于显示屏被拉伸到两侧,这可能导致在手握手机时出现不正确的输入,但在我们的测试中,这不是一个问题。
指纹传感器被整合到显示屏的下方。尽管如此,指纹识别工作得很好,即使不换手。即使在待机状态下,指纹传感器也能以最小的延迟解锁设备。面部识别也是可能的,而且工作可靠。在黑暗中,屏幕的余光通常足以进行识别。然而,如果没有额外的传感器,2D软件识别就不太安全了。
显示屏 - Edge 40 Pro的OLED非常明亮
摩托罗拉Edge 40 Pro的OLED显示屏比其前代产品要亮得多:全区照度超过1000cd/m²,面板在显示相应亮度的HDR内容方面没有问题。
然而,一些竞争对手提供的亮度甚至更高,而Edge 40 Pro在分辨率方面也只是一般。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 1056 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
147.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.206
Motorola Edge 40 Pro P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 30 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi 13 Pro OLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | Honor Magic5 Pro OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8" | Apple iPhone 14 Plus OLED, 2778x1284, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -4% | 9% | -18% | -3% | |
Brightness middle | 1056 | 649 -39% | 1230 16% | 1291 22% | 797 -25% |
Brightness | 1055 | 649 -38% | 1244 18% | 1289 22% | 800 -24% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 98 7% | 94 2% | 96 4% | 97 5% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.28 | 1.18 8% | 1 22% | 1.7 -33% | 0.97 24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.85 | 2.07 27% | 2.8 2% | 4.4 -54% | 1.76 38% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.5 12% | 1.8 -6% | 2.9 -71% | 2.3 -35% |
Gamma | 2.206 100% | 2.236 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.531 87% |
CCT | 6320 103% | 2538 256% | 6446 101% | 6472 100% | 6492 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 235 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 235 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 235 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量
我们注意到在很低的屏幕亮度下有屏幕闪烁,但你可以在显示设置中激活 "防止闪烁 "模式,该模式使闪烁适应刷新率,从而使其不显眼。
根据我们用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测量,在 "自然 "图像模式下,色彩表现非常准确。没有发现蓝色偏移。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.55 ms rise | |
↘ 0.55 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
在户外,显示屏上可以看到清晰的反光,但屏幕的亮度非常高,内容仍然可见。
由于采用了OLED面板,从各个方向都可以很好地看到图像,而且没有颜色偏移。
性能--凭借骁龙处理器的强大功能
得益于 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2,摩托罗拉Edge 40 Pro在性能方面与其他高端智能手机不相上下。即使是 iPhone 14也在承受范围之内。这意味着要求非常高的应用程序对智能手机不构成任何问题,而且在日常生活中几乎没有任何停顿。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11338 - 16880, n=21) | |
Honor Magic5 Pro |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (941 - 173234, n=18) | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro |
我们的测试设备在图形基准测试中也表现得非常好,甚至在某些情况下超过了其他设备。因此,对图形要求高的应用程序和游戏在性能方面不应该是一个问题。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus |
在Edge 40 Pro上浏览网页的速度非常快,因为网页通常是在你滚动浏览时加载的,而且滚动时已经可以看到图片。由于显示速度快,滚动也很流畅。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16) | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23) | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.9 - 225, n=18) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chome 99) | |
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111) | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chome 112) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16) | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112) | |
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (115 - 238, n=11) | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16) | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25) | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109) | |
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22) | |
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111) | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109) | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16) |
* ... smaller is better
快速的UFS 4.0存储是一个明显的升级。Edge 30 Pro。这使摩托罗拉Edge 40 Pro以其极快的数据传输能力和快速的加载时间与竞争对手相提并论。
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | Motorola Edge 30 Pro | Xiaomi 13 Pro | Honor Magic5 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -47% | -5% | -24% | -10% | -45% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3434.4 | 1832 -47% | 3587.83 4% | 3344.12 -3% | 3608 ? 5% | 1839 ? -46% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 2887.4 | 1028 -64% | 2601.45 -10% | 2651.87 -8% | 2530 ? -12% | 1425 ? -51% |
Random Read 4KB | 451.3 | 277.7 -38% | 387.72 -14% | 267.91 -41% | 406 ? -10% | 277 ? -39% |
Random Write 4KB | 539 | 339.5 -37% | 546.98 1% | 298.31 -45% | 421 ? -22% | 309 ? -43% |
游戏 - 乐趣,乐趣,乐趣
摩托罗拉智能手机上的游戏真的很有趣。尽管在许多游戏中不能很好地利用快速屏幕,但在要求高的游戏中至少可以达到流畅的60帧。只有在PUBG Mobile的UltraHD设置下,才会限制在40帧。帧率是用我们的Gamebench测试工具确定的。
短暂的加载时间和具有广泛设置选项的游戏覆盖使游戏体验更加完善。通过精确的触摸屏进行的控制也给我们留下了深刻印象。
排放--Edge 40 Pro的事情变得很热。
温度
鉴于其高功耗,摩托罗拉Edge 40 Pro很难保持凉爽 - 我们测量了最高46.8℃,而且是在室温下。该设备也开始发臭。
在3DMark压力测试中,也很快就能看出Edge智能手机无法在持续负载下保持最大性能,因为在最坏的情况下只剩下65.7%。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi 13 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Plus | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Honor Magic5 Pro |
发言人
摩托罗拉将两个完整的扬声器集成到箱子的顶部和底部。它们提供了很大的能量,能够让一个中等大小的房间充满声音。音质很好;你可以听到深沉的中音,它不会过度膨胀,即使在高音量下也保持良好的清晰度。
外部音频设备可以通过USB-C端口连接,如果有必要,可以通过适配器或蓝牙5.3连接。大多数重要的编解码器都支持无线声音传输,如SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、aptX TWS+、LC3和LHDC V1-4。
Motorola Edge 40 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 伟大的快速充电系统
消耗功率
事实证明,摩托罗拉Edge 40在低负荷下的能耗非常节俭,而在最大负荷下的需求则迅速增加。
你可以用高达125瓦的功率为智能手机充电,而且还包括一个相应的充电器。智能手机再次充满电需要不到半小时的时间。
也可以用高达15瓦的无线充电,还支持高达5瓦的反向充电。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
Idle | 0.7 / 0.8 / 1.3 Watt |
Load |
10 / 13.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro 4600 mAh | Motorola Edge 30 Pro 4800 mAh | Xiaomi 13 Pro 4820 mAh | Honor Magic5 Pro 5100 mAh | Apple iPhone 14 Plus 4323 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -38% | -5% | -4% | 3% | -33% | -14% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 1.2 -71% | 1.02 -46% | 0.91 -30% | 0.7 -0% | 1.036 ? -48% | 0.894 ? -28% |
Idle Average * | 0.8 | 1.6 -100% | 1.36 -70% | 1.63 -104% | 1.1 -38% | 1.766 ? -121% | 1.456 ? -82% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.3 | 2.5 -92% | 1.58 -22% | 1.67 -28% | 1.4 -8% | 1.94 ? -49% | 1.616 ? -24% |
Load Average * | 10 | 5.2 48% | 4.29 57% | 2.61 74% | 6.5 35% | 7.22 ? 28% | 6.45 ? 35% |
Load Maximum * | 13.7 | 10.4 24% | 6.15 55% | 4.57 67% | 9.8 28% | 10.4 ? 24% | 9.8 ? 28% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
Edge 40 Pro的4600毫安时电池与前代产品相比有所缩水,但由于其良好的效率,该设备在我们的Wi-Fi测试中仍然取得了明显更长的运行时间。这还不足以击败Honor Magic5 Pro或 iPhone 14 Plus,但16:24小时的耐力仍然是一个非常好的比率。
由于负载下的高消耗,运行时间很快就会减少,但仍然不错,略低于5小时。
总的来说,你可以用Edge 40 Pro轻松度过一天。即使你不得不将设备插入电源插座,由于有快速充电技术,仅仅几分钟就足以恢复很多百分点。
Motorola Edge 40 Pro 4600 mAh | Motorola Edge 30 Pro 4800 mAh | Xiaomi 13 Pro 4820 mAh | Honor Magic5 Pro 5100 mAh | Apple iPhone 14 Plus 4323 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -6% | -9% | 11% | 30% | |
Reader / Idle | 2102 | 1985 -6% | 1509 -28% | 2580 23% | 3324 58% |
H.264 | 1062 | 1006 -5% | 1263 19% | 1249 18% | 1520 43% |
WiFi v1.3 | 984 | 816 -17% | 846 -14% | 1074 9% | 1085 10% |
Load | 297 | 306 3% | 254 -14% | 276 -7% | 325 9% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 不是完美的,但对节俭的用户来说是很好的。
一切都变得越来越贵,因此摩托罗拉Edge 40 Pro今年也是比2022年更贵的待遇。尽管如此,与其他高端智能手机相比,它还是比较便宜的,如 小米13 Pro或 Honor Magic5 Pro而不需要做出太多妥协。
你可以得到很多性能,一个时尚和防水的外壳,良好的运行时间,强大的扬声器,一个明亮的真彩OLED屏幕,高达165赫兹,以及良好的跟踪能力。股票Android ,以及通过Ready For收集的智能手机与屏幕或PC连接的选项是这款经济型旗舰的进一步论据。
当然,无线局域网可以更快,零星的更新周期对于一款价格略低于1000美元的智能手机来说是不可接受的。你还注意到对相机系统进行了某些不可避免的削减,例如缺乏高端智能手机中经常出现的伟大的潜望式变焦。
通过Edge 40 Pro,摩托罗拉将一个令人印象深刻的整体包装放在一起,在性价比方面非常令人印象深刻。
该 Honor Magic5 Pro也提供了一个很好的包装,但价格明显更高,而且与前代产品相比,已经部分瘦身了。的 小米13 Pro也是一款非常好的高端智能手机,可以考虑作为替代品。
价格和可用性
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- 05/04/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.