Notebookcheck Logo

Honor Magic5 Pro评测--具有全面高端体验的智能手机

放纵自己吧!

Honor Magic5 Pro是一款强大的高端智能手机,拥有非常好的三摄像头,5100毫安时的大电池,快速充电,3D人脸识别,最后还拥有长时间的更新保证。另一方面,我们的测试也显示了一些小设备的差距。
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)

不出所料,魔法4 Pro紧随其后的是Honor Magic5 Pro。Honor ,对其已经很强大的旗舰智能手机进行了升级,使其在许多方面达到了当前的技术水平,但也有一些降级的地方。

在德国,将只提供拥有12GB工作内存和512GB内部存储的大存储版本。在其他国家,你可以另外购买8GB和256GB的型号。

Honor 还提高了更新的可用性,延长了保证更新的时间。与前代产品相比,价格增加了100欧元(约109美元),现在达到1200欧元(约1310美元)。在我们的测试中发现,它是否值得这个价格。

Honor Magic5 Pro (Magic5 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.81 inch 19:54:9, 2848 x 1312 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive, OLED, 2160 Hz PWM dimming, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 488.01 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity sensor, magnetometer, gyroscope, OTG, IR blaster
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.77 x 162.9 x 76.7
Battery
5100 mAh Lithium-Polymer, wireless charging up to 50 W
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.6, 1/1.12", OIS) + 50 MPix (ultrawide, f/2.0, 120°) + 50 MPix (IMX858, 3.5x optical zoom, f/3.0, OIS); dToF laser focus; Magic Log 10 bit Log 4K 60 fps recording; Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.4, fix-focus) + 3D depth camera
Additional features
Speakers: dual, Keyboard: onscreen, 66W charger, USB cable, TPUC case, SIM tool, MagicOS 7.1, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, IP68, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), fanless, waterproof
Weight
219 g
Price
1200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
90.1 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Honor Magic5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
219 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.81"2848x1312
91.1 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740
233 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"3080x1440
90.3 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core
240 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
89.1 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7
212 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3120x1440
89.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Xiaomi 13 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
229 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440
89.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
198.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

在德国,Honor Magic5 Pro有黑色和草地绿两种颜色,其余的颜色选择珊瑚色、橙色(人造皮革)和蓝色仍保留给亚洲市场。黑色款被抛光成高光泽,而绿色款则是亚光的,带有轻微的光泽。

Magic5 Pro的厚度被规定为8.77毫米(约0.35英寸),但我们测量的结果是干净的9毫米,带摄像头的厚度甚至达到12.15毫米(约0.48英寸)。四周的圆角设计使Honor 智能手机显得更加纤细,而且拿在手里很舒服。尽管它有突出的相机模块,但它并不是太重。向摄像头略微隆起的部分被称为 "高迪曲线",是为了向加泰罗尼亚著名建筑师安东尼-高迪致敬。

Magic5 Pro的做工很好,看起来质量很高。正面和背面都使用了玻璃,但没有说明类型。在交付状态下,玻璃被保护膜覆盖。 另一个特点是所有四边的圆形显示边缘。缝隙是非常紧密和均匀的。当试图翘起智能手机时,它看起来非常坚固,但很容易吱吱作响。

SIM卡托盘盖的颜色与铝制框架的颜色相同,但绿色模型的颜色略深。卡盘最多可以接受两张Nano SIM卡。此外,根据IP68认证,Magic5 Pro具有防尘和防水功能。

(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)

尺寸比较

163.6 mm 74.7 mm 9.15 mm 215 g163.4 mm 78.1 mm 8.9 mm 233 g162.9 mm 76.6 mm 8.9 mm 212 g162.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.77 mm 219 g162.9 mm 74.6 mm 8.38 mm 229 g161.76 mm 73.5 mm 8.39 mm 198.5 g160.7 mm 77.6 mm 7.85 mm 240 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 快速USB 3.2,但没有UWB

像它的 前身一样,Magic5 Pro使用一个快速的USB 3.2端口作为物理连接。在我们的数据传输测试中,它的传输速度达到了502 MB/s。凭借这一点,它的速度明显快于例如 Galaxy S23 Ultra(285 MB/s),后者名义上使用相同的标准。还支持OTG,允许你将外围设备和外部存储媒体连接到智能手机上。有线显示输出也是可能的。

该是一个红外发射器,可以控制家庭多媒体设备、空调设备或摄像头。NFC可用于非接触式支付,但你必须要有UWB。

顶部:扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
顶部:扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器
左侧(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
左侧
右侧:音量、功率(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
右侧:音量、电源
底部:扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
底部:扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡

软件 -Honor MagicOS 7.1和五年的更新。

Honor Magic5 Pro交付时配备了谷歌Android 13和内部MagicOS 7.1用户界面。在本次测试时,安全补丁是2023年2月1日的水平,所以它们仍然是相当最新的。Honor ,延长了更新的期限,承诺三个主要的软件更新,直到Android 16和五年的安全补丁。

MagicOS提供了一些新的功能,包括一个可以在不同设备间同步的便条应用,以及从图片中复制文字和电话号码的选项。如果你通过电缆将Honor 智能手机连接到显示器或电视上,你可以简单地镜像显示内容或使用桌面模式。然后,智能手机可以作为一个触控板来控制鼠标光标。

除了制造商提供的几个应用程序,Honor ,还安装了几个第三方应用程序,包括Booking、Netflix和TikTok,但这些都可以完全卸载。

红外爆破器应用
桌面模式

通信和GNSS - Magic5 Pro不带6-GHz WLAN

在通信特性方面,Honor Magic5 Pro在规格表上表现得非常现代,也可以处理5G Sub6,支持宽频段和Wi-Fi 7。然而,后者在实践中有一些限制,因为尽管该智能手机支持WLAN的 "be "标准,但它不能使用6GHz网络。这不必要地限制了潜在的快速无线连接的选择。

结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,Magic5 Pro的传输速率仍然非常好,因为Honor 使用160-MHz频谱(VHT160)。连接的稳定性也让人没有理由抱怨。

Networking
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1531 (min: 1445) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1474 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1496 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1671 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1754 (min: 1618) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1504 (min: 1343) MBit/s ∼86%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 643) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
817 (min: 751) MBit/s ∼49%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
904 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
945 (min: 917) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1645 (min: 1586) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1743 (min: 1585) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
809 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
993 (min: 972) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1859 (min: 919) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1637 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼94%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
881 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
839 (min: 531) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1657 (min: 1379) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1522 (min: 1278) MBit/s ∼87%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1369 (min: 720) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1499 (min: 1195) MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1368 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼78%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1754 (1618-1808)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1504 (1343-1604)
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1530 (1445-1600)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1496 (1387-1627)
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1450 (743-1639)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1645 (801-1815)
GPS测试:在室内
GPS测试:在室内
GPS测试:户外
GPS测试:户外

即使在室内,Honor Magic5 Pro也能非常迅速和准确地建立卫星连接。为了确定自己的位置,该智能手机支持所有可能频段的四大卫星网络。

我们将Magic5 Pro与 Garmin Venu 2,带他们进行一次短途自行车旅行。记录的路线长度几乎相同,记录的准确性也处于相似的水平,这使得Honor 智能手机非常适用于导航任务。

GNSS测试路线:环湖
GNSS测试路线:环湖
GNSS测试路线:转折点
GNSS测试路线:转折点
GNSS测试路线:概述
GNSS测试路线:概述

电话功能和语音质量

在电话功能方面,Honor Magic5 Pro支持VoLTE和WLAN通话,但系统中没有实现SIP Konen管理。这款智能手机还具有双卡功能,可以使用两张Nano SIM卡,也可以用eSIM卡代替。你也可以把eSIM和一张Nano SIM结合起来,但双eSIM是不可能的。

将手机放在耳边,语音质量真的很好,而且Magic5 Pro还能很好地抑制周围的噪音。在扬声器模式下,智能手机只有很小的回声,但音量可以更大。

一个特殊的功能是人工智能保护的呼叫,呼叫的音量根据周围的噪音水平进行调整,从而确保呼叫者不能被周围的其他人听到,同时仍然确保用户可以很容易地理解。

照相机 - 三个50万像素的传感器和100倍变焦

用Honor Magic5 Pro拍摄的自拍。
用Honor Magic5 Pro拍摄的自拍。

前面是两个镜头,位于稍大的显示屏凹槽后面。其中一个是1200万像素的摄像头,另一个是用于面部识别的3D传感器。虽然相机没有自动对焦功能,但它仍然能成功地拍摄出非常有吸引力的自拍,即使在较弱的光线条件下。人像模式为对象提供了许多设置选项,如软化模式或调整面部轮廓和肤色。此外,你还可以停用虚化模式。即使这能很好地模糊背景,但对头发的粘连也有一些困难。视频可以用30FPS的超高清录制。

主摄像头提供高达50MP的分辨率,并拥有一个相对较大的传感器区域,即使是那些 vivo X90 Pro小米13 Pro更大。通过像素分选过程,四个相邻的像素被合并成一个大像素,从而产生12.2MP的照片。 你可以选择4:3、1:1和全屏图像格式。在日光下拍摄的照片给人留下深刻印象,色彩构成均衡,没有任何夸张的锐化。 在黑暗中拍摄的照片,物体被大幅提亮,容易导致细节看起来被冲淡。在这方面,Honor 可能仍然会通过更新提供一些改进。

这款超广角镜头还提供了50MP的分辨率,提供了有吸引力的照片。深度锐利的细节很丰富,即使在边缘区域也很有说服力。此外,这支镜头还可以处理微距拍摄。然而,这里的算法往往会使一些区域过于均匀。在手机意识到它必须切换之前,它也可能需要一些时间。但设置中也提供了一个手动切换模式。

该组的第三个5000万像素镜头是一个3.5倍变焦镜头,带有光学图像稳定功能(OIS)。尽管在低光照条件下,该镜头的质量迅速下降,但在日光下,即使是较长的焦距,它仍然取得了良好的数据。虽然100倍的最大变焦水平听起来很不错,但它很难成功拍摄出有吸引力的照片。图像稳定功能相当成功,但 Galaxy S23 Ultra在手持时仍能明显地保持较高的稳定性,特别是在长焦距下。

总之,Magic5 Pro成功地拍出了好到非常好的照片,而且这款智能手机提供了一个非常完整的整体包装,另外还通过高摄影速度来完善。不仅相机启动迅速,而且自动对焦也非常快,快门释放延迟也非常短。

在录制视频方面,Honor Magic5 Pro也提供了一些良好的功能,如果你使用16:9格式,能够以高达60 FPS的超高清分辨率录制视频。如果你还想用HDR10+录制或需要21:9格式,你必须切换到拍摄模式,但此时你只能在24和30FPS中选择。此外,还提供了10位LOG模式。在拍摄过程中,你可以切换到超广角,但变焦只能以数字方式进行,变焦程度最高可达10倍。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light

在控制光线条件下记录我们的测试图时,画面乍一看很有吸引力,但细节略显模糊。

色彩的再现并不夸张,而是相对自然地呈现出各种颜色。只有亮红色的DeltaE>10.然而,白平衡可以稍微明亮一些。

ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic5 Pro: 6.49 ∆E min: 1.6 - max: 12.53 ∆E
ColorChecker
19.4 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
21 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
33 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic5 Pro: 26.29 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 35.6 ∆E

附件和保修 - 大量的附件

Magic5 Pro配有一个保护套和充电器(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
Magic5 Pro配备了一个保护套和充电器。

Honor Magic5 Pro 24的保修期为24个月,不能扩大或延长。然而, ,在前六个月还提供额外的显示屏保护,如果需要更换显示屏,最高服务费为65欧元(约71美元)。

在配件的数量上没有任何妥协,智能手机的包装盒包括一个66瓦的模块化充电器,一条USB线(Type-A转Type-C),一个SIM卡工具,以及一个透明的TPU保护壳。Honor

输入设备和操作 - Magic5 Pro变得更加安全

Honor Magic5 Pro的电容式触摸屏可同时识别多达10个触摸点,并提供非常好的滑动特性,特别是在屏幕上方的保护膜下。输入被可靠地识别并准确地执行。在显示屏上还有一个超声波指纹传感器。它不仅能快速解锁智能手机,而且还显示出非常好的识别率。

通过3D人脸识别(ToF)解锁的速度更快,同时安全性也不低。为了进一步提高安全性,Magic5 Pro使用了所谓的离散安全芯片组,为密码和生物识别数据提供额外保护,以确保最大限度的隐私。

除谷歌助手外,还包括悠游助手,处理应用建议和启用魔法文本等功能。我们已经从以前的机型中知道的指关节手势再次可用,否则Honor ,还提供一些额外的功能,如多窗口或智能感应,可以在设置中激活。还包括一个单手操作的模式。

 

显示屏 - 带有LTPO和2.160-Hz直流调光的明亮的OLED显示屏

子像素网格
子像素网格

Honor Magi5 Pro有一个6.81英寸的显示屏,以扩展的全高清分辨率确保高像素密度。该系统可以在1至120赫兹之间动态调整刷新率,但你也可以在设置中手动设置为60、90或120赫兹。除了杜比视界之外,所有常见的HDR标准都得到了支持。

显示屏亮度非常高,采用纯白显示和激活的亮度传感器,平均达到非常明亮的1,289cd/m²。在光区和暗区均匀分布的情况下(APL18),这个数值并没有增加多少,只达到1439cd/m²,这明显低于承诺的1800cd/m²的最高亮度。如果你手动调整亮度,最高可以达到794 cd/m²。

在我们用示波器的测量中,我们只看到120赫兹的持续闪动。这可以追溯到2160赫兹的强大的直流调光,这意味着用户的眼睛应该尽可能地保护,避免典型的OLED闪烁。

1305
cd/m²
1289
cd/m²
1278
cd/m²
1302
cd/m²
1291
cd/m²
1262
cd/m²
1308
cd/m²
1293
cd/m²
1269
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1308 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1288.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.02 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1291 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Honor Magic5 Pro
OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 3080x1440, 6.8"
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"
Google Pixel 7 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"
Xiaomi 13 Pro
OLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Honor Magic4 Pro
OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8"
Screen
-4%
11%
21%
18%
11%
-21%
Brightness middle
1291
1117
-13%
1061
-18%
1022
-21%
1230
-5%
1020
-21%
956
-26%
Brightness
1289
1133
-12%
1057
-18%
1025
-20%
1244
-3%
1020
-21%
959
-26%
Brightness Distribution
96
97
1%
99
3%
99
3%
94
-2%
96
0%
94
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.7
2.2
-29%
1.3
24%
0.9
47%
1
41%
1
41%
2.4
-41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.4
3.9
11%
3.1
30%
2.1
52%
2.8
36%
2.8
36%
5.2
-18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
2.3
21%
1.6
45%
1.1
62%
1.8
38%
2.1
28%
3.3
-14%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.37 93%
2.19 100%
2.22 99%
2.24 98%
2.29 96%
2.26 97%
CCT
6472 100%
6572 99%
6511 100%
6650 98%
6446 101%
6502 100%
6804 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

用固定的变焦水平和各种亮度设置进行测量

如果你选择正确的设置,显示屏的色彩再现可以非常自然。 为此,你需要在显示选项中选择正常色彩模式和标准色温。虽然这时你将无法再用肉眼发现任何颜色偏差,但白平衡也会显示出最小的绿色色调,尽管这在日常操作中并不明显。在标准设置中,还原度更低,颜色更饱和,但Magic5 Pro也将覆盖更大的DCI P3色彩空间。

灰度(色彩模式:正常;色温:标准;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式:正常;色温:标准;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(色彩模式:正常;色温:标准;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(色彩模式:正常;色温:标准;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:正常;色温:标准;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:正常;色温:标准;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:正常;色温:标准;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:正常;色温:标准;目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6225 ms rise
↘ 0.5575 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.87 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3795 ms rise
↘ 0.491 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在户外,Honor Magic5 Pro给人留下了极好的印象,它的显示屏在任何光线条件下都能保持清晰可读。即使是恼人的反射也在限制范围内。

户外(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
户外(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。

Magic5 Pro的可视角度稳定性非常好。从陡峭的视角来看,我们只能检测到最小的亮度损失,颜色反转并不明显。

Honor Magic5 Pro的可视角度稳定性
Honor Magic5 Pro的可视角度稳定性

性能--Magic5 Pro采用了骁龙8代2号处理器

Honor Magic5 Pro是由 骁龙8代2拥有12GB的LPDDR5x工作内存。这承诺了非常高的性能,这在很大程度上也被我们的基准测试结果所证实。然而,采用相同SoC的其他智能手机往往略微快一些,这已经让我们怀疑Honor ,无法对芯片的热量进行最佳散热。

在系统基准测试中,这款智能手机的表现达到了预期水平,在PCMark和AnTuTu中名列前茅,在CrossMark中仅落后于预期。然而,在日常操作中,我们不能抱怨,因为系统运行很流畅。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1885 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1556 Points +5%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1499 Points +1%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1486 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1048 - 1574, n=20)
1455 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1328 Points -11%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1226 Points -17%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1048 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points -33%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5533 Points +14%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5201 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5082 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4192 - 5243, n=20)
4918 Points +1%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4846 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4251 Points -12%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3377 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points -32%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3222 Points -34%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1976 Points +1%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1952 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1753 - 2008, n=10)
1925 Points -1%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1753 Points -10%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1487 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points -36%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5422 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4255 - 5702, n=10)
5234 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5221 Points 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5208 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3862 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points -35%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1277795 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1111522 - 1322448, n=17)
1259049 Points +3%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1227867 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1226224 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1073804 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
949107 Points -23%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
940036 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points -35%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
773857 Points -37%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17340 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
15991 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 20394, n=24)
15817 Points +2%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15550 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
14789 Points -5%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14283 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points -17%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11397 Points -27%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1329 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1226 Points +24%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1224 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (778 - 1356, n=22)
1138 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1103 Points +11%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1079 Points +9%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
992 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
886 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points -11%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
9585 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9091 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (7354 - 9730, n=22)
8794 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8164 Points -15%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7567 Points -21%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7376 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points -34%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
6164 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14275 Points +5%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
13642 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13412 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10786 - 15148, n=22)
13173 Points -3%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10990 Points -19%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10786 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points -26%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
9294 Points -32%
Memory
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10467 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (6601 - 10834, n=22)
9479 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9075 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8777 Points -16%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7806 Points -25%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7232 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points -35%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5456 Points -48%
Graphics
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
29649 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
28497 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (22837 - 32334, n=22)
27375 Points -8%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
22986 Points -22%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
21737 Points -27%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19247 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points -43%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
16375 Points -45%
Web
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1994 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1960 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1850 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1077 - 2044, n=22)
1777 Points -11%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1758 Points -12%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1739 Points -13%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1665 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points -22%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
80599 Points +611%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
42662 Points +276%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16511 Points +46%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15778 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=21)
15142 Points +34%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
14572 Points +29%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
11338 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
39328 Points +3006%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (941 - 173234, n=18)
29790 Points +2253%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25873 Points +1944%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1354 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1312 Points +4%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1266 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1008 Points -20%

高端的 阿德雷诺740GPU处理图形加速。在基准测试中,这导致了与CPU性能类似的情况,只是这里的差异比较小。只有在屏幕测试中,帧率往往被限制在每秒60帧。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3791 Points +5%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3784 Points +5%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3595 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3196 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2768 Points -23%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2585 Points -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1807 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3843 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3829 Points +4%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3687 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3365 Points -9%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2796 Points -24%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2639 Points -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1847 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14369 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13984 Points +1%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13827 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
12367 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10982 Points -21%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10317 Points -25%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6721 Points -51%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6293 Points +1%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6231 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5857 Points -6%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4672 Points -25%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3801 Points -39%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24707 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23070 Points -7%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20640 Points -16%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18581 Points -25%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10987 Points -56%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14893 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14487 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13223 Points -11%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9968 Points -33%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8449 Points -43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +140%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
497 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
492 fps +4%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
456 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
455 fps -4%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
439 fps -7%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +140%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +92%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps +40%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +27%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
289 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
260 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
237 fps -9%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
139 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +82%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +52%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -7%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
222 fps +8%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
206 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
190 fps -8%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
187 fps -9%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps -13%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps -27%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -51%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps +8%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -3%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -38%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
126 fps +1%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -18%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
98 fps -22%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -22%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +2%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
54 fps -8%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -14%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -24%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -53%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps -1%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -10%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -24%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps -32%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
41 fps -40%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps +73%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps +40%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps +37%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +12%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps +28%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps +28%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
133 fps +8%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -3%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps -8%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -39%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps +3%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps -7%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -23%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
23 fps -23%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -27%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -53%

在使用Chrome浏览器的基准测试中,Magic5 Pro在其性能级别中提供的结果大多比较平均。然而,这在日常操作中并不明显,因为网站加载速度非常快。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
278.979 Points +139%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
159.102 Points +36%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
137.873 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23)
133.1 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
117.894 Points +1%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
116.696 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
98.153 Points -16%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
77.337 Points -34%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
371 runs/min +234%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
143 runs/min +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.9 - 225, n=18)
141.6 runs/min +28%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +23%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
111 runs/min
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
110.9 runs/min 0%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
104 runs/min -6%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
99.2 runs/min -11%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
65.5 runs/min -41%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
201 Points +105%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
157 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 110)
145 Points +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22)
130.6 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points +16%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
101 Points +3%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
98 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
90 Points -8%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
71 Points -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
72024 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
59214 Points +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25)
45827 Points +15%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
44245 Points +11%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
42544 Points +7%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
39825 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points -7%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
37098 Points -7%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
27730 Points -30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * -60%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
1440.1 ms * -47%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
1104 ms * -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22)
1023 ms * -4%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
1011.5 ms * -3%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
981.4 ms *
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
690.6 ms * +30%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
685 ms * +30%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
469.9 ms * +52%

* ... smaller is better

Honor Magic4 Pro拥有512GB的UFS 4.0存储。存储速度相应地变快,至少在数据的连续读写中是如此。对于较小的数据块,该智能手机的表现低于其潜力。

Honor Magic5 ProSamsung Galaxy S23 UltraGoogle Pixel 7 ProXiaomi 13 ProMotorola Edge 30 UltraHonor Magic4 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
-40%
33%
-5%
-17%
31%
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB
3344.12
3426.56
2%
1346.78
-60%
3587.83
7%
1717.77
-49%
1868.5
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB
2651.87
1389.84
-48%
874.73
-67%
2601.45
-2%
1363.58
-49%
1367.48
-48%
Random Read 4KB
267.91
449.77
68%
219.01
-18%
387.72
45%
349.08
30%
268.76
0%
Random Write 4KB
298.31
152.92
-49%
253.18
-15%
546.98
83%
446.25
50%
366.13
23%

游戏--《PUBG》移动版,最高90FPS

Adreno 740为Play商店的所有游戏提供了足够的性能,此外还支持目前所有的图形连接。然而,我们仍然可以看到Honor Magic5 Pro的一些限制。

但在《PUBG Mobile》中就不是这样了。这款射击游戏在所有图形设置下运行时绝对没有任何卡顿。在超清模式下,这意味着稳定的40 FPS,如果你把设置降到最低,你甚至可以得到90 FPS。坦克世界》同样在任何时候都不会出现任何卡顿,可以在所有的荣耀中运行,但不幸的是,120-FPS选项不可用。我们使用GameBench测试了这两款游戏。.

此外,Honor ,在其系统中提供了一个所谓的游戏管理器,其中包括一些舒适功能。然而,屏幕记录只在1280 x 588像素这个略显奇特的分辨率下创建。

Honor 游戏经理
Honor 游戏经理
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
坦克世界
坦克世界
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Honor Magic5 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.5.0: Ø88.8 (85-91)
Honor Magic5 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.5.0: Ø59 (53-61)
Honor Magic5 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.5.0: Ø39.7 (37-41)
Honor Magic5 Pro; World of Tanks Blitz; 9.8.0.690: Ø60 (59-60)

排放 -Honor 智能手机的SoC冷却能力较弱

温度

在空闲运行期间,Honor Magic5 Pro始终保持舒适的冷却。在负载情况下,它的温度明显升高,但在最高34 °C(93 °F)的情况下不会太热。

我们已经在基准测试中看到了一些迹象,而3DMark Wild Life(Extreme)的压力测试则证实了性能并没有在长时间内保持稳定。在所有三种情况下,Honor 智能手机的性能至少下降了其原始值的50%。到目前为止,在我们测试的其他搭载骁龙8代的智能手机中还没有出现这种情况。虽然这在系统运行或游戏时并不明显,但它也解释了《坦克世界》中的FPS限制。

Max. Load
 33.9 °C31.8 °C34 °C 
 32.4 °C31.3 °C33.8 °C 
 32.3 °C32 °C32.5 °C 
Maximum: 34 °C
Average: 32.7 °C
30.8 °C30.8 °C30.8 °C
30.4 °C30.7 °C30.6 °C
30.2 °C30.6 °C31.6 °C
Maximum: 31.6 °C
Average: 30.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.1 % +104%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
80.1 % +96%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 % +69%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.9 % +66%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.3 % +60%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 % +46%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40.8 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.2 % +88%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75.6 % +61%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
66.7 % +42%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.1 % +35%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.6 % +33%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.7 % +25%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.9 %
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø18.3 (10.4-22.2)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.8 (13.5-23)
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø56.7 (31.6-77.5)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (53.6-77.7)
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø76.6 (37.1-83.4)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø72.7 (55.1-86.1)

发言人

Honor Magic5 Pro提供了一对有吸引力的扬声器,确保了良好的声音输出,包括DTS:X。虽然中音可以稍微多一点,但在中等音量下这并不是很明显。

那些想把耳机或扬声器连接到智能手机的人可以使用USB端口进行有线连接,或使用蓝牙5.2进行无线连接。不幸的是,没有读出音频编解码器的支持,但使用带有SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC的耳机没有任何问题。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202935.32525.334.93125.7354026.724.55029.336.16321.130.38017.8211001727.812513.13716012.651.820011.752.525011.154.13151256.140010.958.350011.964.363010.459.18009.765.9100010.774.6125011.973.9160011.172.2200011.777250012.377.7315013.578400012.573.1500012.671.5630013.369.1800013.670.51000014.171.11250013.570.21600013.270.5SPL24.486N0.561.7median 12.3median 70.2Delta1.18.133.834.727.935.324.334.828.240.536.739.422.237.525.442.32144.318.648.315.458.615.159.213.161126112.76211.868.212.967.310.473.413.374.813.27812.179.312.279.912.982.314.88115.882.516.182.614.479.613.680.413.578.614.473.51570.225.991.80.789.6median 13.5median 74.81.39hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor Magic5 ProSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Magic5 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 5,100 mAh,可长时间运行

消耗功率

Honor Magic5 Pro的功耗处于较低水平,特别是在最大亮度下得到了改善。

在我们的测试中,在调整后的显示亮度(150cd/m²)下,Honor 智能手机呈现出高效的特点,只有在空闲操作时消耗才相当高。使用附带的66瓦的充电器,电池可以在47分钟内完全充电,16分钟后已经达到50%,32分钟后达到80%。虽然这仍然非常快,但Honor ,与前代产品(100瓦)相比,这里的充电性能有所下降。另一方面,你仍然可以使用高达50瓦的无线充电,而且还支持反向充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.91 / 1.63 / 1.67 Watt
Load midlight 2.61 / 4.57 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor Magic5 Pro
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
4323 mAh
Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 13 Pro
4820 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh
Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-11%
-11%
-8%
-18%
-2%
-42%
-69%
-49%
Idle Minimum *
0.91
0.9
1%
0.61
33%
0.78
14%
1.02
-12%
0.74
19%
0.87
4%
1.036 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=23)
-14%
Idle Average *
1.63
1.05
36%
1.7
-4%
1.61
1%
1.36
17%
1.84
-13%
2.04
-25%
1.766 ?(0.8 - 7.18, n=23)
-8%
Idle Maximum *
1.67
1.1
34%
1.73
-4%
1.63
2%
1.58
5%
1.86
-11%
2.26
-35%
1.94 ?(1.07 - 8.22, n=23)
-16%
Load Average *
2.61
3.99
-53%
3.85
-48%
3.29
-26%
4.29
-64%
2.75
-5%
4.97
-90%
7.22 ?(2.61 - 15.3, n=23)
-177%
Load Maximum *
4.57
7.82
-71%
5.94
-30%
6.01
-32%
6.15
-35%
4.54
1%
7.46
-63%
10.4 ?(4.57 - 18.1, n=23)
-128%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.72 (1.004-11.4)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.7 (1.089-14.7)
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.325 (1.182-2.72)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.5 (9.88-11)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.6 (10.3-12.7)
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.325 (1.182-2.72)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)

电池寿命

凭借其强大的5100毫安时电池,Honor Magic5 Pro的电池寿命很长,超过了大多数竞争对手。但特别是在视频再现时,Galaxy S23 UltraiPhone 14 Pro Max仍然持续时间明显更长。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
43h 00min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 111)
17h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 49min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 36min
Honor Magic5 Pro
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
4323 mAh
Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 13 Pro
4820 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh
Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh
Battery Runtime
14%
27%
-28%
-18%
-5%
-16%
Reader / Idle
2580
2139
-17%
3473
35%
1210
-53%
1509
-42%
2206
-14%
1346
-48%
H.264
1249
1543
24%
1688
35%
1213
-3%
1263
1%
1188
-5%
995
-20%
WiFi v1.3
1074
1100
2%
948
-12%
676
-37%
846
-21%
872
-19%
687
-36%
Load
276
400
45%
416
51%
226
-18%
254
-8%
323
17%
389
41%

Pros

+ 明亮的ltpo显示屏,最高可达120赫兹
+ 非常好的电池寿命
+ 防尘和防水
+ 长时间的更新保证
+ 超声波指纹和3D面部扫描
+ 准确定位

Cons

- 不支持 6-GHz的Wi-Fi 7
- 没有 UWB
- 脆弱的 SoC 冷却

结论 - 一个强大的高端智能手机,几乎没有弱点

测试Honor Magic5 Pro。测试装置由Honor Global提供(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
测试Honor Magic5 Pro。测试装置由Honor Global提供。

通过Magic5 Pro,Honor ,继续改进其 前代产品,提供了一个包含强大技术的整体方案,不必躲避任何竞争对手。特别是在安全方面,Honor 又迈出了一步,首次引入了专用的安全芯片组,而且它也是目前唯一具有3D人脸识别功能的Android 智能手机。

Honor Magic5 Pro是一款一流的Android 智能手机,只显示出微小的弱点。

在我们的测试中,这款智能手机以其明亮和准确的LTPO显示屏给人留下深刻印象,尽管最高亮度仍然明显落后于承诺的1800cd/m²。另一个亮点是5000万像素的三摄像头系统,在摄影和视频录制方面提供了令人信服的性能,尽管它仍然需要一些改进。此外,Honor ,再次增加了保证更新的时间,现在提供与谷歌对其Pixel智能手机相同的时间段。

Magic5 Pro应该受到一些批评,特别是其薄弱的SoC冷却。在较长的负载下,性能下降原来比平均水平高。这也有点奇怪,Wi-Fi 7名义上支持,但Honor 智能手机却无法使用6-GHz的网。

Magic5 Pro的其他强大替代品是 小米13 Pro三星Galaxy S23 Ultra,尽管它们也强调了一些不同的领域。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Honor Magic5 Pro - 04/17/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
93%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
70 / 70 → 99%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
93%
Games Performance
66 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
96 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
80%
Average
85%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Honor Magic5 Pro评测--具有全面高端体验的智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-04-11 (Update: 2024-08-15)