Apple iPhone 14智能手机评测-- 手机的小升级Apple

Name: Apple iPhone 14
Brand: Apple

更像是一部iPhone 13S。

iPhone 14的代际升级仅限于一些细微的变化。然而，与此同时，基本价格攀升至800美元，而唯一真正的创新发生在iPhone 14 Pro系列中。在这篇评论中，我们将探讨，标准的iPhone是否仍然是当今最好的智能手机之一。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/13/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Apple Smartphone Touchscreen iPhone iOS

诸如动态岛、永远在线的显示屏、4800万像素的摄像头和最新的 A16 BionicSoC， Apple iPhone 14 Pro和 iPhone 14 Pro Max是关注的焦点。标准机型没有提供同样水平的新的和令人兴奋的功能。

iPhone 14非常类似于 iPhone 13.几乎没有任何外部物理变化。然而，内部有一些变化。iPhone 14配备了与iPhone 13 Pro相同的SoC。 iPhone 13 Pro而且还继承了它的1200万像素主摄像头。此外，与前代产品相比，它的内存增加了50%，并提供了令人兴奋的新功能，如自动紧急呼叫。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Apple iPhone 14 (iPhone Series)

Processor

Apple A15 Bionic 6 x 2 - 3.2 GHz

Graphics adapter

Apple A15 GPU 5-Core

Memory

6 GB

Display

6.10 inch 19.5:9, 2532 x 1170 pixel 460 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, HDR (HDR10, Dolby Vision), glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB NVMe, 128 GB

, 116 GB free

Connections

Audio Connections: Audio via Lightning port, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer, face scanner (3D, infrared), UWB

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), 4G (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 53, 66), 5G (band n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n25, n26, n28, n30, n38, n40, n41, n48, n53, n66, n70, n77, n78, n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 146.7 x 71.5

Battery

3279 mAh Lithium-Ion, Charging: 20W (Lightning), 15W (MagSafe), 7.5W (Qi)

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Apple iOS 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual: 12MP (26 mm, ƒ/1.5, sensor‑shift optical image stabilization, 7‑element lens, 4K video) + 12MP (2x optical zoom, 5x digital zoom, 13 mm, ƒ/2.4, 120°, 5‑element lens)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix ƒ/1.9, 6‑element lens

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo speakers (hybrid), Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, Lightning-to-USB-C cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP68-certified; 0.98 W/kg (head), 0.98 W/kg (body) , fanless, waterproof

Weight

172 g

Price

799 Euro

Links

Apple homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
89.2 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2022	Apple iPhone 14 A15, A15 GPU 5-Core	172 g	128 GB NVMe	6.10"	2532x1170
88.7 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2021	Apple iPhone 13 A15, A15 GPU 4-Core	173 g	128 GB NVMe	6.10"	2532x1170
88.6 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	Asus Zenfone 9 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	169 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5.90"	2400x1080
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2021	Google Pixel 6 Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20	207 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.40"	2400x1080
87 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	OnePlus 10T SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	203.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2412x1080
87.7 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Xiaomi 12 SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	179 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.28"	2400x1080

案例 - 一个具有更好的可修复性的iPhone 13克隆品

如果不是因为新的颜色版本，iPhone 14和iPhone 13在视觉上是无法区分的。扁平的设计和圆角的设计在两款机型上都存在。同样，在后置摄像头的对角线排列方面也没有什么变化。包含前置摄像头和一些传感器的显示屏切口的大小和位置也没有改变。

除了熟悉的黑色、白色和红色之外，iPhone 14现在还有紫色和新的、更浅的蓝色可供选择。7.8毫米与7.7毫米（约3.07英寸与约3.03英寸），Apple ，这款智能手机与前代产品相比，厚度非常小。不过，iPhone 13的外壳仍然适合iPhone 14。

按照惯例，Apple ，在制造质量方面没有做出任何妥协。铝制外壳闪耀着伟大的工艺，并能抵御来自角落的扭曲尝试。Apple'的陶瓷玻璃，Ceramic Shield，保护了正面和背面。iPhone14具有IP68规定的防尘和防水功能。据Apple ，这使得智能手机可以在水下6米（约19.69英尺）的地方生存，而不会受到任何损害。

欧洲版的iPhone 14继续提供一个纳米SIM卡插槽。同时，美国机型省略了SIM卡插槽，转而支持独家eSIM。

也许最大的变化可以在光滑的机箱内找到，因为Apple ，完全改造了智能手机的内部布局。因此，iPhone 14比它的前辈更容易维修。例如，该智能手机现在可以从背面打开，因为背板不再与外壳相连。

尺寸比较

连接性--Apple 智能手机的内存增加50%。

AppleiPhone 14有三种不同的存储配置。128GB的机型售价为799美元，256GB的机型为899美元，512GB的机型为1099美元。每部手机有6GB的内存，与去年的4GB相比，这款智能手机可以获得50%的系统内存。

除了NFC、MagSafe和UWB之外，连接性还包括蓝牙5.3（iPhone 13：蓝牙5.0）。Apple其专有的Lightning 端口仍然用于充电和数据传输，后者的速度高达480 Mb/s，使其与USB 2.0相当。

目前还不知道Apple ，iPhone 15是否会改用USB-C。虽然欧盟委员会已经决定USB-C将成为智能手机的强制配置，但该法规在2024年中期才生效，这使得iPhone 16成为其适用的第一款产品。其他传言表明，iPhone 14将完全不使用任何物理接口。除了无线MagSafe充电，美国机型改用eSIM也似乎表明了这一点。

软件 - iOS 16和可定制的锁屏

iPhone 14配备了iOS 16。在10月中旬的测试时，它已经收到了16.0.3版本的更新，其中包括一系列的错误修复和安全补丁。由于Apple ，最新的操作系统版本支持所有智能手机，从发布的 iPhone 8及以后的所有智能手机，iPhone 14的潜在买家可以期待至少5年的操作系统更新。然而，制造商并没有正式确认这一点。

虽然iOS的设计感觉很熟悉，但有大量的新功能。可定制的锁屏可能是最突出的一个，可单独适应用户的背景、小工具和实时活动。此外，对焦功能得到了改进，发送的信息可以追溯编辑，听写功能已经修订，包括表情符号，而且iCloud照片库现在更容易与家庭成员分享。iOS 16的所有新功能都在这里列出https://www.apple.com/ios/ios-16/.

动态岛和永远在线的显示屏是专业机型独有的。

通信和GNSS - 碰撞检测

Apple iPhone 14有22个支持的5G和28个支持的4G频段，提供了非常广泛的频率范围，这应该足以在几乎任何地方获得信号。Apple ，这款手机使用四根天线（4x4 MIMO）进行LTE连接，以达到更好的数据吞吐量。

iPhone 14配备了两个新的通信功能，希望你不会需要这些功能。碰撞检测和卫星SOS。前者能检测到高加速力，并能在碰撞后自主呼叫紧急服务。碰撞检测在默认情况下是启用的，可以在iPhone 14的iOS设置中的设置、紧急SOS、碰撞检测和严重碰撞后呼叫中进行切换。

卫星求救功能与碰撞检测功能类似，仅在没有活动的蜂窝或Wi-Fi连接时可用于紧急呼叫。卫星SOS将从今年11月开始首先向美国和加拿大的用户提供。目前还不知道是否有任何计划将支持范围扩大到北美以外的地区。

iPhone 14使用带有2根天线的Wi-Fi 6进行Wi-Fi通信。它实现了持续良好的传输速率，比iPhone 13的传输速率略快。 iPhone 13.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	934 (768^min - 949^max) MBit/s +25%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	919 (892^min - 936^max) MBit/s +23%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	854 (763^min - 898^max) MBit/s +14%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	746 (642^min - 765^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=188, last 2 years)	719 MBit/s -4%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	938 (470^min - 957^max) MBit/s +5%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	933 (865^min - 958^max) MBit/s +4%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	894 (834^min - 918^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	757 (380^min - 826^max) MBit/s -15%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=190, last 2 years)	736 MBit/s -18%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1715 (801^min - 1773^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1945, n=80, last 2 years)	1444 MBit/s
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1407 (872^min - 1714^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1751 (879^min - 1776^max) MBit/s
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1602 (797^min - 1629^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=80, last 2 years)	1377 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	833 (794^min - 859^max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	802 (421^min - 857^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	895 (870^min - 907^max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	715 (672^min - 723^max) MBit/s

Apple iPhone 14; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø746 (642-765)

Apple iPhone 14; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø894 (834-918)

iPhone 14依靠卫星网络GPS、GLONASS、Galileo、QZSS和BeiDou来实现其定位能力。这使得Apple 智能手机能够快速确定我们的位置，即使在室内也能达到约3米（约9.84英尺）的精度。

在我们骑车的时候，智能手机的地理定位功能与我们的健身智能手表Garmin Venu 2竞争，我们带着它来做比较。在密集的住宅区，iPhone偶尔会稍微偏离轨道，在某些情况下，记录的路线甚至会穿透一些建筑物的墙壁。总体而言，它在导航方面仍然做得很好，几乎与智能手表的测量总轨迹距离一致。对于日常使用，其准确性很容易就能满足。

电话和通话质量--双eSIM或Nano SIM + eSIM

iPhone 14支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话。欧洲机型还配备了一个可以接受纳米SIM卡的SIM卡槽。此外，或者说，可以激活一个eSIM。美国机型则使用双eSIM卡，没有SIM卡插槽。

iPhone 14提供了良好的通话质量，即使在相对嘈杂的环境中也能发出清晰的声音。虽然在通话过程中，环境噪音可能偶尔会很明显，但在短时间内就会很快被消除。在免提模式下，虽然我们在短距离内对着麦克风说话时音量会下降，但通话质量仍然很明显。

照相机--iPhone 13 Pro的主相机

与前代产品一样，iPhone 14采用了1200万像素的双摄像头，但在多个地方进行了升级。1200万像素的主摄像头与 iPhone 13专业版.这将传感器的尺寸从1.7微米增加到1.9微米，并将光圈从f/1.6提高到f/1.5。

与主摄像头一样，自拍摄像头也得益于更好的光线输出（f/1.9对f/2.2）。此外，它还配备了自动对焦功能，特别是在短距离内的清晰度略有提高。与iPhone 13相比，超宽摄像头没有任何变化。虽然它仍然不具备光学图像稳定功能，并能产生良好的效果，但它不能完全匹配主摄像头的质量。

iPhone 14的主摄像头采用了传感器移位图像稳定技术，可以捕捉到色彩自然、细节丰富的优秀照片。与iPhone 13相比，其质量几乎没有任何差别。 iPhone 13除了一个例外。

由于其更加感光的光学器件和相机软件的集成图像处理引擎（Apple 称之为Photonic Engine），iPhone 14的夜景拍摄比iPhone 13更好。我们的低光场景也显示了这一点，较新的机型在黑暗区域捕捉到了更多的细节和更丰富的色彩。尽管光子引擎是一项软件功能，但它只适用于iPhone 14系列，在旧款iPhone上并不启用，即使是在更新到iOS 16之后。

iPhone 14还获得了两项用于视频录制的新功能。许多用户已经熟悉了iPhone 13的影院模式，它能识别人脸并自动添加虚化效果，现在也可以用每秒24帧或30帧的4K模式。以前，全高清是这种模式的极限。

动作模式是全新的，可以电子稳定用主摄像头或超宽摄像头拍摄的视频。这在实践中效果非常好。即使相机由于被固定在自行车把手上或在手持iPhone冲刺时发生晃动，图像也能稳定下来。由于行动模式的视频看起来相当有颗粒感，用户不应该对质量有太多的期待。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1 Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2 Ultraweitwinkel Lowlight-Aufnahme

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在固定的照明条件下，主摄像头再一次证明了自己。即使在1勒克斯的亮度下，它也能以丰富的对比度和令人惊讶的高色彩保真度捕捉到测试图表，尽管清晰度比理想条件下略低。

ColorChecker Apple iPhone 14: 11.57 ∆E min: 3.74 - max: 15.84 ∆E

配件和保修 - 仍未包括充电器

iPhone14的交货范围并不十分广阔。平面包装只包括智能手机本身，一条USB线（USB type-C到Lightning ），一个SIM卡工具，一个Apple 贴纸，一个快速启动指南，以及保修信息。Apple 提供了广泛的可选配件，包括一个合适的充电器，MagSafe外壳和耳机。

Apple 在美国提供标准的一年有限保修。服务范围可以通过 AppleCare+计划扩大。https://www.apple.com/support/products/iphone/计划扩大服务范围，该计划的形式是无限制的每月订阅或一次性支付2年的费用。无论哪种付款方式，AppleCare+都包括无限制的意外损坏维修。

输入设备和处理 - 60 Hz为黄金标准

尽管iPhone 14的价格接近800美元，但这并没有打消Apple ，使其不再依赖60Hz的屏幕。虽然与专业机型相比，动画效果不那么流畅，但输入仍然非常精确，反应迅速。

iPhone 14没有配备指纹传感器。这使得面部识别Face ID成为唯一可用的生物识别认证方法。由于使用了3D摄像头，它非常可靠，并被认为非常坚固。由于使用了一个集成的红外传感器，Face ID甚至可以在黑暗中工作。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 与iPhone 13相同的OLED面板

与之相比 iPhone 13，iPhone 14的显示屏没有变化。6.1英寸OLED显示屏的分辨率为2532×1170像素，像素密度为460PPI，非常出色。宣传的典型最大亮度为800尼特，Apple ，相对来说是比较温和的。均匀照明的OLED面板在显示SDR内容时，平均亮度达到840.7尼特，峰值亮度为858尼特。支持HDR10和Dolby Vison。

在我们测试的所有亮度水平上，显示器以60赫兹运行。这对敏感的用户来说可能是个问题，因为PWM闪烁无法通过选择更高的亮度设置来规避。因此，我们建议用户在购买前先试用一下iPhone 14。


848 cd/m²	833 cd/m²	849 cd/m²
840 cd/m²	835 cd/m²	858 cd/m²
836 cd/m²	830 cd/m²	837 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 858 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 840.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 835 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.034

	Apple iPhone 14 OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1"	Apple iPhone 13 OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1"	Asus Zenfone 9 AMOLED , 2400x1080, 5.9"	Google Pixel 6 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	OnePlus 10T Fluid AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi 12 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"
Screen		21%	-17%	-7%	-29%	-13%
Brightness middle	835	831 0%	793 -5%	805 -4%	861 3%	867 4%
Brightness	841	830 -1%	796 -5%	805 -4%	856 2%	867 3%
Brightness Distribution	97	98 1%	97 0%	98 1%	97 0%	98 1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.05	0.77 27%	1.9 -81%	1.4 -33%	2.27 -116%	1.7 -62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.81	1.52 46%	3.4 -21%	3.7 -32%	4.17 -48%	4.4 -57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.6	1.2 54%	2.3 12%	1.8 31%	2.9 -12%	1.8 31%
Gamma	2.034 ^108%	2.209 ^100%	2.26 ^97%	2.29 ^96%	2.303 ^96%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6616 ^98%	6501 ^100%	6860 ^95%	6507 ^100%	6141 ^106%	6762 ^96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

60 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行测量

使用True Tone，iPhone 14会根据环境照明条件调整显示器的颜色，以确保图像的一致性。由于这导致颜色不断变化，我们必须在进行CalMAN测量之前禁用True Tone。即使没有这个辅助功能，在我们的测试实验室中，iPhone 14也以出色的色彩准确性而闪耀。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于其明亮的显示屏和巨大的可视角度，iPhone很适合在户外使用。即使在阳光直射下，屏幕上的内容仍然容易阅读。

性能 - 带有一个额外GPU核心的A15 Bionic

新的iPhone，新的处理器：Apple ，打破了这一传统，在iPhone 14中引入了一个两级社会。虽然专业机型收到了全新的 A16 Bionic而标准机型则不得不使用 A15 Bionic这是从iPhone 13代开始的SoC。仍然有一个小的处理器升级。iPhone 14中的A15仿生芯片使用的是与iPhone 13 Pro相同的处理器。 iPhone 13 Pro.因此，它配备的是 5核-GPU版本而不是A15 Bionic的4核GPU版本。

由于iPhone 13的性能基本相同，在合成基准测试中，iPhone 14似乎并没有从额外的图形核心中获得多少好处。相反，额外的GPU能力在图形基准测试中变得很明显，我们的测试模型的3DMark和GFXBench得分更高。在不包括Kraken 1.1的浏览器基准测试中，它也确保了一个小的优势，尽管这可能要追溯到更新的浏览器版本。

Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v9 | CrossMark

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096	1755 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1732 Points
Average Apple A15 Bionic (1590 - 1755, n=9)	1723 Points -1%
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1322 Points -24%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1277 Points -26%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1237 Points -29%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	1041 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)	1012 Points -42%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096	4820 Points +2%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (4559 - 4914, n=9)	4755 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	4733 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	4436 Points -6%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	3987 Points -16%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3581 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)	3370 Points -29%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	2805 Points -41%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1081005 Points +30%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	982789 Points +18%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	846323 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	829792 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096	813876 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 2056989, n=105, last 2 years)	810387 Points -2%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (722973 - 832548, n=8)	788523 Points -5%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	702981 Points -15%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1180 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1163 Points -1%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (1132 - 1190, n=5)	1156 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1109 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years)	894 Points -24%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	849 Points -28%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	806 Points -32%

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2876 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2776 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2698 Points -3%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2418 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2313 Points -17%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1823 Points -34%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	3005 Points
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2824 Points -6%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2754 Points -8%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2586 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2470 Points -18%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2067 Points -31%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	11779 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11087 Points -6%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10989 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	9979 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9782 Points -17%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7064 Points -40%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps +50%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60.1 fps 0%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	446.6 fps
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	435 fps -3%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	428 fps -4%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	416.3 fps -7%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	381 fps -15%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	144 fps -68%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps +94%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps +32%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60.2 fps +1%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	253 fps
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	221 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	217.4 fps -14%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	213 fps -16%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	176 fps -30%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -64%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88 fps +47%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60.1 fps 0%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -5%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	172.4 fps
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	171 fps -1%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	164 fps -5%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	138.6 fps -20%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps -34%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -65%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +35%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps +29%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	58.5 fps -2%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -40%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	105.2 fps
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	96.6 fps -8%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84 fps -20%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps -26%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -62%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86 fps +49%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps +20%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	57.6 fps
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	54.9 fps -5%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -31%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps +15%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps +15%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	38.2 fps
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	37.2 fps -3%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps -40%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps +63%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93 fps +55%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -22%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps +11%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	112.9 fps +2%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	111.1 fps
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 fps -11%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -56%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	189.85 Points
Average Apple A15 Bionic (173.5 - 189.9, n=8)	182.1 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)	180 Points -5%
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)	147.648 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)	121.7 Points -36%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	113.8 Points -40%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	90.1 Points -53%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	81.383 Points -57%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	341 runs/min
Average Apple A15 Bionic (228 - 347, n=8)	266 runs/min -22%
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)	244 runs/min -28%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)	139.5 runs/min -59%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	107 runs/min -69%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	104 runs/min -70%
Asus Zenfone 9	102 runs/min -70%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	93.4 runs/min -73%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Apple A15 Bionic (188 - 189, n=3)	188.3 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	188 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)	146 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years)	114.5 Points -39%
OnePlus 10T	75 Points -60%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	279 Points
Average Apple A15 Bionic (219 - 279, n=8)	254 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)	219 Points -22%
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)	168 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points -47%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	148 Points -47%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	110 Points -61%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	106 Points -62%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	65726 Points
Average Apple A15 Bionic (57143 - 65969, n=8)	63305 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)	62664 Points -5%
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)	54646 Points -17%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	43376 Points -34%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	39982 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)	37643 Points -43%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	37279 Points -43%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	1627.3 ms * -228%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1551 ms * -212%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	1034 ms * -108%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	930 ms * -87%
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)	768.66 ms * -55%
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	496.4 ms *
Average Apple A15 Bionic (414 - 507, n=8)	456 ms * +8%
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)	413.6 ms * +17%

* ... smaller is better

游戏--游戏的最大细节

有了芯片SoC和其5核GPU Bionic A15 5核iPhone 14的性能足以流畅地显示App Store上的所有游戏。例如，战术射击游戏《PUBG Mobile》，即使在最大的 "超高清/最大 "设置下也非常流畅。由于A15 GPU的性能非常高，用户很可能在几年内不会遇到任何性能问题。

由于我们的测试应用程序Gamebench还不支持iOS 16，我们很遗憾不能在这里显示游戏基准。我们希望能够尽快将我们的结果附加到这篇文章中。

No graph data

排放--不仅仅是负载下的温度过高

温度

在负载情况下，iPhone 14的温度可高达41.7°C（107.06°F），因此在长时间使用后会感到有些不舒服的温度。当在超过典型室温的环境中使用该智能手机时，这可能会变得特别令人烦恼。

Apple 智能手机的内部结构也可以达到非常高的温度。正如我们的3DMark Wild Life压力测试所显示的那样，这种情况只在运行基准测试应用程序几个循环后就会发生。类似于 iPhone 13，随着时间的推移，性能赤字达到约10至15％。由于A15 Bionic的整体性能很高，节流可能只在要求非常高的应用程序中才会成为问题，在日常使用中几乎不会。

Max. Load

Idle


32.4 °C	33.5 °C	32.2 °C
34.6 °C	35.6 °C	33.2 °C
36.4 °C	39.7 °C	34.4 °C

Maximum: 39.7 °C
Average: 34.7 °C


30.1 °C	36.2 °C	30.5 °C
30.6 °C	38 °C	33.2 °C
32 °C	41.7 °C	39.5 °C

Maximum: 41.7 °C
Average: 34.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.5 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92.7 % +10%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	84.1 %
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	80.1 % -5%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.1 % -37%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.1 % -37%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46.3 % -45%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	77 % +2%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	75.5 %
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54.9 % -27%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52.8 % -30%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%

Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø14 (13.2-17.5)

Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (12.3-16)

Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49.9 (48.4-57.6)

Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47 (44.5-55.5)

发言人

一个扬声器在底部，一个在凹槽上方，作为混合扬声器，iPhone 14使用与iPhone 13用户相同的立体声扬声器设置。 iPhone 13的用户的用户已经很熟悉了。声音仍然由高音主导，这使得音频体验有些孱弱，在高音量时有令人讨厌的特点。

有线耳机和扬声器可以通过Lightning 端口或适当的适配器与iPhone连接，而无线设备可以通过蓝牙5.3连接。由于不支持aptX编解码器，用户应确保其蓝牙设备支持AAC编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple iPhone 14 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 13 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--略好于iPhone 13

能源消耗

ǞǞǞ A15 Bionic的能源效率非常好，在空闲时消耗的电量甚至比它的SoC兄弟姐妹更少。 iPhone 13.负载下稍高的功耗可能是由额外的GPU核心解释的。在我们的比较中，Android 竞争对手无法接近iPhone的能源效率。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.6 / 0.8 / 1 Watt
Load	5.4 / 9.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Apple iPhone 14 3279 mAh	Apple iPhone 13 3240 mAh	Asus Zenfone 9 4300 mAh	Google Pixel 6 4614 mAh	OnePlus 10T 4800 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh	Average Apple A15 Bionic	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-5%	-14%	-8%	-8%	-42%	-24%	-44%
Idle Minimum *	0.6	0.6 -0%	1.01 -68%	0.68 -13%	0.8 -33%	0.87 -45%	0.66 ?(0.51 - 1.1, n=8) -10%	0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) -48%
Idle Average *	0.8	1 -25%	1.1 -38%	1 -25%	1.2 -50%	1.7 -113%	1.303 ?(0.8 - 2.2, n=8) -63%	1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years) -81%
Idle Maximum *	1	1.3 -30%	1.17 -17%	1.02 -2%	1.3 -30%	1.82 -82%	1.748 ?(1 - 4.2, n=8) -75%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years) -61%
Load Average *	5.4	4.5 17%	3.3 39%	5.39 -0%	3.5 35%	4.68 13%	4.85 ?(2.65 - 6.7, n=8) 10%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -21%
Load Maximum *	9.2	7.8 15%	7.89 14%	9 2%	5.9 36%	7.41 19%	7.77 ?(3.56 - 11.4, n=8) 16%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -8%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic: Ø4.94 (0.779-10.1)

Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic: Ø4.54 (0.574-10.7)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.37 (7.63-8.9)

Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.76 (4.8-9.44)

Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.701 (0.658-0.95)

Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.709 (0.637-1.368)

电池寿命

3729毫安时与3240毫安时相比，iPhone 14的电池与iPhone 13相比略大。 iPhone 13.虽然按照Android ，这两块电池都很小，但它们非常有效地利用了能量储备。

iPhone 14的续航时间比iPhone 13略长一些，网络浏览使用近17小时，视频播放21小时，取得了非常好的效果。

iPhone 14支持的最大充电率为20瓦特。使用官方的，但不幸的是不包括的Apple 充电器，为空电池完全充电需要1：34小时。另外，智能手机可以通过MagSafe以高达15瓦的速度充电，或通过Qi Charging以高达7.5瓦的速度无线充电。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		44h 49min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		21h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 49min

	Apple iPhone 14 3279 mAh	Apple iPhone 13 3240 mAh	Asus Zenfone 9 4300 mAh	Google Pixel 6 4614 mAh	OnePlus 10T 4800 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh
Battery Runtime		1%	4%	-17%	-1%	-7%
Reader / Idle	2689	2734 2%	1685 -37%	2020 -25%	1795 -33%	2558 -5%
H.264	1266	1224 -3%	1401 11%	1219 -4%	1646 30%	890 -30%
WiFi v1.3	1010	1019 1%	825 -18%	627 -38%	856 -15%	760 -25%
Load	289	299 3%	462 60%	291 1%	332 15%	385 33%

Pros

+ 卓越的 OLED 显示屏

+ 防尘和防水

+ 快速的Wi-Fi

+ 支持的频率范围广

+ 伟大的相机

+ 非常快的性能

+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 显示限制在60赫兹

- 充电率限制在20瓦

- 没有微距镜头

- 宽缺口

关于Apple iPhone14的评论

与去年的 iPhone 13，最新的iPhone没有什么变化。一个改进的主摄像头，一个更强大的GPU部分为 A15 Bionic，一个稍大的电池，以及软件功能，如碰撞检测 - 这些是一些最重要的，但也几乎是iPhone 14所提供的全部新功能。

Apple报道中的信息很清楚：那些正在寻找4800万像素摄像头、更快的SoC或120Hz显示屏等创新的用户，将不得不选择更昂贵的专业机型。

发现iPhone 14和它的前辈之间的差异几乎需要一个放大镜。不管怎么说，Apple ，这款手机总体上仍然是一款优秀的、尽管昂贵的智能手机。

尽管或由于迷你的升级，我们的评价仍然与前代产品相同。iPhone14也是一款优秀的智能手机，由于其制造质量、显示屏、相机、电池寿命和性能，属于最高端的设备级别。

当然，iPhone 14也有一些缺点。对一款拥有60赫兹显示屏的智能手机收取800美元的费用，只有Apple ，这是不可能的。同样，用户仍然要面对相对缓慢的快速充电和宽大的凹槽。此外，Apple's备受赞誉的卫星紧急求救功能目前仅限于美国和加拿大。

iPhone 14的替代品包括iPhone 13和 iPhone 13 Pro后者具有自适应120赫兹显示屏和一个额外的长焦摄像头等优势，价格几乎相同。在Android ，我们推荐紧凑而强大的机型，如华硕ZenFone 9或小米12.

价格和可用性

在官方商店直接购买时，Apple ，128GB存储的基本型号的iPhone 14价格为799美元。256GB和512GB的型号分别为899美元和1099美元。其他零售商通常以类似的价格列出该智能手机。

Apple iPhone 14 - 10/13/2022 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

90%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

48 / 70 → 69%

Weight

90%

Battery

92%

Display

90%

Games Performance

72 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

91 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

81 / 90 → 90%

Camera

80%

Average

84%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 463597 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple iPhone 14智能手机评测-- 手机的小升级Apple

Manuel Masiero, 2022-10-13 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例 - 一个具有更好的可修复性的iPhone 13克隆品

尺寸比较

连接性--Apple 智能手机的内存增加50%。

软件 - iOS 16和可定制的锁屏

通信和GNSS - 碰撞检测

电话和通话质量--双eSIM或Nano SIM + eSIM

照相机--iPhone 13 Pro的主相机

配件和保修 - 仍未包括充电器

输入设备和处理 - 60 Hz为黄金标准

显示屏 - 与iPhone 13相同的OLED面板

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 带有一个额外GPU核心的A15 Bionic

游戏--游戏的最大细节

排放--不仅仅是负载下的温度过高

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Apple iPhone 14 audio analysis

Apple iPhone 13 audio analysis

电池寿命--略好于iPhone 13

能源消耗

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

关于Apple iPhone14的评论

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison