Notebookcheck Logo

Fairphone 5 评测--8 年更新、5 年保修的可持续智能手机

良心危机

Fairphone 5 希望成为市场上最具可持续性和模块化的智能手机，在尽可能公平的条件下生产。尽管它注重可持续发展，但其目标是提供现代化的用户体验，并在至少八年内接受更新。我们的测试将评估这一理念的执行情况。
5G Android Renewable Smartphone Touchscreen
(图片：丹尼尔-施密特）

Fairphone 5 是继 Fairphone 4.

这家荷兰企业在 Fairphone 5 上更进一步，注重更高的调制程度、更公平的贸易和更多的可回收组件。所有这些都旨在使 Fairphone 5 成为世界上最公平、最可持续的智能手机。

它的价格较高，约为 750 美元，但它也拥有更多的技术。请继续阅读，了解 Fairphone 5 在日常生活中的表现。

Fairphone 5
Processor
Qualcomm QCM6490 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 643, Core: 812 MHz
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.46 inch 19.9:9, 2700 x 1224 pixel 459 PPI, Capacitive, OLED, 300 Hz touch sampling rate, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 226 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, magnetometer, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2 LE, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G, LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.6 x 161.6 x 75.83
Battery
16.25 Wh, 4200 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 3.87 V
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX800, f/1.9, 1.0 µm, OIS) + 50 MPix (Macro/Ultra Wide, IMX858, f/2.2, 0.7 µm) + TOF 3D; Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung JN1, f/2.5, 0.74 µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, 60 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1; MIL-STD 810H (Drop test from 1.5m); IP55; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), QZSS (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a); Audio Codecs Bluetooth: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, Opus; HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, fanless
Weight
212 g
Price
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
83.2 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Fairphone 5
QCM6490, Adreno 643		212 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.46"2700x1224
88.9 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Google Pixel 8
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		187 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.20"2400x1080
90.5 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy S23
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
78.3 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Nokia G42
SD 480+, Adreno 619		194 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.56"1612x720

Fairphone 5 的屏占比高达 83%，也许不会给人留下超现代的印象，但它的设计简洁、美观。磨砂铝边框不易沾染指纹，智能手机有磨砂黑、天蓝和透明三种颜色可供选择。我们的测试设备使用的是透明款。

Fairphone 5 的机身重量减轻了一些，卡扣式机背增添了一丝怀旧感。背面由 18 个小塑料齿固定，需要用力才能松开，并小心地重新锁紧。盖子下面是可更换电池，取下后即可轻松触及。然后才是 nano-SIM 卡插槽和 microSD 卡插槽，这两个插槽都配有弹出机制。

在材料选择方面，Fairphone 5 非常重视可回收材料。值得注意的是，Fairphone 5 中 94% 的铝、82% 的镁、77% 的铟和 69% 的塑料都来自回收材料。锡、铜、镍和稀土的回收比例也相对较高。原材料的来源是另一个关键因素。Fairphone 5 采用的原材料（金：100%；钴：100%；银：100%；锂：99%；钨：99%）均来自非危机地区。供应商必须遵守安全和人道的工作条件标准（SA8000 和 ISO45001），智能手机的制造过程使用 100% 的可再生能源。

对于有兴趣进一步拆卸的用户，拆卸过程非常简单，只需使用十字螺丝，无需胶水。12 颗银色螺丝可以连接 USB 端口、扬声器、摄像头和卡槽。八颗黑色螺丝用于固定正面，在更换显示屏或前置摄像头时需要拧松。这种设计让许多用户可以自己进行常见的维修，提高了可维修性。值得注意的是，这款智能手机并不防水。不过，它的防护等级达到了 IP55，可以从任何角度防止灰尘和水柱的侵入。

(图片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
165 mm 75.8 mm 8.6 mm 194 g162 mm 75.5 mm 10.5 mm 225 g161.6 mm 75.83 mm 9.6 mm 212 g150.5 mm 70.8 mm 8.9 mm 187 g146.3 mm 70.9 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - USB 3.2，支持 microSD

Fairphone 5 拥有标准功能。USB 3.2 端口（Gen.1）的运行速度高达 5 GBit/s，但在复制测试中表现较慢（139.55 MB/s）。在支持 OTG 的同时，该智能手机还支持有线图像输出，但仅限于屏幕镜像。由于 USB 端口不能识别 exFAT 或 NTFS，用户在将外置硬盘连接到智能手机时应确保格式正确。

该手机也没有 UWB 芯片、无线充电或专用安全芯片。

microSD 读卡器

值得注意的是，它还集成了 microSD 卡插槽，树立了典范。虽然它在跨平台磁盘测试中的表现令人印象深刻，但在复制测试中的传输速率却低于平均水平。与 USB 端口不同，microSD 卡插槽支持 exFAT 文件系统。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
57.33 MB/s +211%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
21.4 MB/s +16%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
18.45 MB/s
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
12.75 MB/s -31%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø22.2 (10.1-39.1)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.4 (32.1-55.6)
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.9 (22.6-78.9)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.6 (43.7-98)

软件 - Fairphone 5 的最长更新保证期

Fairphone 5 预装了谷歌Android 13，预计至少在八年内会收到安全补丁和五次重大更新。 Android 因此，18 可以预见。

除谷歌应用程序外，智能手机上只有 "我的 Fairphone"应用程序，该程序收集有关技术状态的基本信息，并提供直接获取支持的途径。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 良好的跟踪性能和 6 GHz 无线局域网

Wi-Fi 6E 可用于家庭 Wi-Fi，也包括使用 6 GHz 频段。结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，Fairphone 5 不仅实现了很高的传输速率，而且基本稳定。

Fairphone 最多可通过 5G Sub5 接入数据网络，并提供极其广泛的频率支持。在大都市环境中接收特性良好，数据传输速率也达到了预期水平。

Networking
Fairphone 5
iperf3 receive AXE11000
814 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
926 (min: 473) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1845 (min: 1781) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1517 (min: 1476) MBit/s ∼95%
Google Pixel 8
iperf3 receive AXE11000
891 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
867 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1570 (min: 1043) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1521 (min: 1325) MBit/s ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S23
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1659 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1749 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1799 (min: 1744) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1590 (min: 1562) MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia G42
iperf3 receive AXE11000
336 (min: 310) MBit/s ∼20%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
362 (min: 340) MBit/s ∼21%
Fairphone 4
iperf3 transmit AX12
327 (min: 315) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
344 (min: 337) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼87%
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Qualcomm Adreno 643; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1845 (1781-1909)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1799 (1744-1867)
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Qualcomm Adreno 643; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1515 (1476-1544)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1589 (1562-1612)
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Qualcomm Adreno 643; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø813 (774-838)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1658 (1603-1686)
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Qualcomm Adreno 643; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø910 (473-975)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1750 (1253-1880)
GPS 测试：楼内
楼内
GPS 测试：户外
室外

在室外，跟踪非常快速和精确，而在室内，则需要更长的时间，尤其是在 Fairphone 5 确定准确位置之前。不过，一旦确定位置，它就会非常精确。

这些特点在我们的短途试驾中也很明显，因为这款智能手机准确地记录了行驶路线，可与 Garmin Venu 2 直接比较。

全球导航卫星系统，环湖
全球导航卫星系统，环湖
全球导航卫星系统，转折点
全球导航卫星系统，转折点
全球导航卫星系统，摘要
全球导航卫星系统，摘要

电话功能和语音质量

当把 Fairphone 5 放在耳边时，它的语音质量很好，能可靠地过滤掉轻微的背景噪音。如果周围环境变得嘈杂，降噪功能就会达到极限，使说话者的声音大大减弱，并让背景噪音反复穿透。扬声器模式工作正常，只有轻微的混响效果。

Fairphone 有一个实体 nano-SIM 卡空间，也可以安装 eSIM 卡作为替代，以实现双 SIM 卡操作。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能。

摄像头 - Fairphone 5 配备了带 ToF 功能的出色双摄像头

Fairphone 5 自拍（纵向模式）
Fairphone 5 自拍（纵向模式）

Fairphone 5 的前置摄像头高达 5000 万像素，但采用了像素分选技术，最终成像只有 1250 万像素。画质尚可，但白天图像锐化严重，暗光下对比度较低。

背面的两个镜头也是各 5000 万像素，但它们的传感器不同。主镜头来自索尼，具有光学防抖功能。它能拍摄出相当不错的照片，尽管图像的动态范围应该更大一些。虽然超广角镜头很早就出现了噪点，但由于分辨率高，它在外围区域的成像性能也很稳定，细节也很丰富。该镜头也可用于微距拍摄，但会出现严重的虚化现象。变焦不是 Fairphone 的强项。

Fairphone 5 能以 30 FPS 的超高清速度录制双面视频。另外，全高清（或高清）也有 60 FPS。遗憾的是，只提供 16:9 格式，而且也不提供 24 FPS 的帧速率。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
8.1 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Fairphone 5: 4.85 ∆E min: 0.67 - max: 12.18 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
42 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
43 ∆E
39.7 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Fairphone 5: 33.49 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 45.86 ∆E

配件和保修 - 注册后可使用五年

免费注册 Fairphone 5 后，智能手机的保修期将从 24 个月延长至五年，这在智能手机领域是绝无仅有的。

除了智能手机外，包装盒里仍然空空如也；甚至连充电线都没有。制造商解释说，大多数人已经拥有了最必要的配件。保护盖（每个约 43 美元）和屏幕保护膜（约 36 美元）可供选择。用户还可以在商店里购买备件，自行更换。

输入设备和操作 - Fairphone 5，最高 300 Hz

Fairphone 5 的电容式触摸屏采样率相对较高，达到 300 Hz，具有良好的滑动性能和可靠的响应。

边框或电源按钮上的指纹传感器确保了生物识别安全。识别率高，解锁速度快。通过前置摄像头进行面部识别的速度明显更快，但安全性也较低。

线性振动电机可提供精确而有吸引力的触觉反馈，声音可闻但不会太大。

显示屏 - 90-Hz OLED，带直流调光功能

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
自定义屏幕设置

Fairphone 5 的 6.49 英寸 OLED 显示屏像素密度高，显示内容清晰。制造商指定的亮度高达 800 cd/m²，但我们在测试中并未达到这一水平，相反，在纯白显示屏上，无论环境光传感器是否激活，平均亮度都为 617 cd/m²。在 APL18 测量中，峰值也保持在类似水平；在显示 HDR 内容时，我们只能测量到 721 cd/m²。

最低亮度时，显示屏以 90 Hz 的频率持续闪烁；亮度稍高时，频率会翻倍。不过，频率非常均匀，因此出现投诉的风险很低，但我们不能排除这种可能性。可选的直流调光模式除了使面板变得稍暗之外，没有任何可识别或可测量的效果。事实上，直流调光似乎一直处于激活状态。

609
cd/m²		611
cd/m²		624
cd/m²
613
cd/m²		620
cd/m²		628
cd/m²
613
cd/m²		614
cd/m²		621
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 628 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 617 cd/m² Minimum: 5.91 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 620 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.85
Fairphone 5
OLED, 2700x1224, 6.5"		Google Pixel 8
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.2"		Samsung Galaxy S23
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.1"		Nokia G42
IPS, 1612x720, 6.6"		Fairphone 4
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"
Screen
67%
35%
-40%
-2%
Brightness middle
620
1450
134%
1125
81%
495
-20%
513
-17%
Brightness
617
1410
129%
1122
82%
452
-27%
492
-20%
Brightness Distribution
97
92
-5%
96
-1%
84
-13%
88
-9%
Black Level *
0.5
0.54
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.4
1.1
68%
3.2
6%
6.09
-79%
2.96
13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5
4.2
16%
4.9
2%
9.35
-87%
5.55
-11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.2
2.1
60%
3.3
37%
5.8
-12%
3.6
31%
Gamma
1.85 119%
2.24 98%
1.97 112%
2.325 95%
2.321 95%
CCT
6390 102%
6584 99%
6504 100%
8169 80%
6032 108%
Contrast
990
950

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

当我们使用 AMOLED 设置选择高级色彩模式并调整色温时，我们可以获得最佳的色彩表现（见上图）。然后，Fairphone 5 使用更大的 DCI-P3 色彩空间，但灰度显示偏绿。

灰度（色彩模式：扩展/AMOLED，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
灰度（色彩模式：扩展/AMOLED，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩（色彩模式：扩展/AMOLED，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩（色彩模式：扩展/AMOLED，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩空间（色彩模式：扩展/AMOLED，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩空间（色彩模式：扩展/AMOLED，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
饱和度（色彩模式：扩展/AMOLED，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
饱和度（色彩模式：扩展/AMOLED，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.884 ms rise
↘ 0.7695 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.547 ms rise
↘ 10.37 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).



在室外，Fairphone 5 给人的印象不错。在阴天，显示屏更容易阅读，但在夏天，只有少数几个保护区可以使用。

Fairphone 5 的视角稳定性
视角稳定性
Fairphone 5 在阴天的户外。
室外

性能 - 配备长寿命 SoC 的 Fairphone 5

Fairphone 5 的 SoC 采用了一种不同寻常的解决方案：高通 QCM6490。 高通 QCM6490.这种芯片组实际上是为物联网产品而开发的，与 骁龙 778G.QCM6490 的优势在于它是一款长寿命的 SoC，因此高通公司会在更长的时间内提供更新，使 Fairphone 操作系统的长更新周期成为可能。

不过，这款 SoC（2021 年推出）并非全新产品，它属于中高端产品，拥有 8 GB LPDDR4x 内存。从目前的情况来看，这足以让智能手机毫不费力地处理所有日常任务，但集成的 Adreno 643已经意味着在游戏方面必须做出妥协。现在很难预测三年、四年甚至七年后的情况。不过，从可能的长期使用情况来看，性能似乎还算稳定。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v9 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1549 Points +78%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1260 Points +45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points +19%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
870 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
870 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
789 Points -9%
Fairphone 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
632 Points -27%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
554 Points -36%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4974 Points +69%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points +18%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3395 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2987 Points +1%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
2944 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
2944 Points 0%
Fairphone 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1855 Points -37%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1643 Points -44%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1984 Points +76%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1653 Points +46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points +32%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
1129 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
1129 Points 0%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
746 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5149 Points +72%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4225 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points +39%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
2999 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
2999 Points 0%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1917 Points -36%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1134684 Points +90%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points +36%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
603046 Points +1%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
597212 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
597212 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
540593 Points -9%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1508318 Points +123%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points +93%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1107295 Points +64%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
676317 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
676317 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
15270 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
12699 Points +7%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
11866 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
11866 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
10897 Points -8%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10492 Points -12%
Fairphone 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8035 Points -32%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1221 Points +54%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
955 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points +16%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
794 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
794 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
734 Points -8%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
525 Points -34%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8830 Points +77%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
6974 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points +30%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
4997 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
4997 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4576 Points -8%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3311 Points -34%
System
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
14401 Points +27%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
11327 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
11327 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
9876 Points -13%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
8251 Points -27%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6975 Points -38%
Memory
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9115 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8871 Points +73%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points +38%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5488 Points +7%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
5133 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
5133 Points 0%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3715 Points -28%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
26748 Points +249%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18975 Points +147%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points +135%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
7673 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
7673 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6632 Points -14%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3826 Points -50%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1779 Points +27%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1657 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points +13%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
1398 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
1398 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1239 Points -11%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1213 Points -13%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
25563 Points +187%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
19875 Points +123%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16702 Points +87%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
8922 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
8922 Points 0%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5126 Points -43%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +3426%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
25112 Points +3397%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1320 Points +84%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1136 Points +58%
Fairphone 5
Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192
718 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490
  ()
718 Points 0%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
413 Points -42%
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3699 Points +317%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2439 Points +175%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
887 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
681 Points -23%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
333 Points -62%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
288 Points -68%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3857 Points +335%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points +173%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
887 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
687 Points -23%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
340 Points -62%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
294 Points -67%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13911 Points +344%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8977 Points +186%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3135 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2434 Points -22%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1119 Points -64%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
970 Points -69%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8635 Points +178%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3102 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2465 Points -21%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1124 Points -64%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
984 Points -68%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6185 Points +25%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4995 Points +1%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4960 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4897 Points -1%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3583 Points -28%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3359 Points -32%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21767 Points +205%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13546 Points +90%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7131 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5563 Points -22%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2814 Points -61%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2448 Points -66%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13955 Points +115%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9813 Points +51%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6499 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5341 Points -18%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2955 Points -55%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2605 Points -60%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +35%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +35%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
108 fps +21%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
89 fps
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
83 fps -7%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
459 fps +189%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
317 fps +99%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
159 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
133 fps -16%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
91 fps -43%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +82%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps +18%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps +5%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
66 fps
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps -6%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps +201%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps +8%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
90 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps -13%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
45 fps -50%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps -54%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +145%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +33%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
51 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
49 fps 0%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
49 fps
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
186 fps +170%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps +33%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps -16%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
33 fps -52%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -58%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +289%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +107%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +4%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps 0%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps -39%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +208%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +85%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -15%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps -52%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -60%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +367%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps +167%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -10%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -10%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +250%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps +106%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -28%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.3 fps -59%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps -64%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +264%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +127%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -9%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -9%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps -45%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps +188%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps +102%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
49 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -29%
Fairphone 4
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps -59%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -63%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +266%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps +95%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -28%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.9 fps -65%
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
158.595 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +8%
Fairphone 5 (Chrome 119)
115.42 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()
115.4 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
104.25 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
66.879 Points -42%
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115)
65.687 Points -43%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
146 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +1%
Fairphone 5 (Chrome 119)
116 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()
116 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
94 Points -19%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
64 Points -45%
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115)
63 Points -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
59913 Points +54%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
47776 Points +23%
Fairphone 5 (Chrome 119)
38966 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()
38966 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
25439 Points -35%
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115)
20689 Points -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115)
2279.9 ms * -107%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
1742.9 ms * -58%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -38%
Fairphone 5 (Chrome 119)
1102.4 ms *
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()
1102 ms * -0%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
998 ms * +9%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
701.7 ms * +36%

* ... smaller is better

Fairphone 5Samsung Galaxy S23Nokia G42Fairphone 4Xiaomi Poco X5 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
45%
-34%
-32%
12%
-2%
63%
Sequential Read 256KB
965.01
3133.7 ?(UFS 4.0)
225%

1686.71 ?(UFS 3.1)
75%

492.5
-49%
917
-5%
1008.77
5%
887 ?(482 - 1009, n=32)
-8%
1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years)
96%
Sequential Write 256KB
789.23
844 ?(UFS 4.0)
7%

628.53 ?(UFS 3.1)
-20%

461.8
-41%
214.8
-73%
878.9
11%
694 ?(369 - 913, n=32)
-12%
1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years)
86%
Random Read 4KB
226.8
427.61 ?(UFS 4.0)
89%

343.65 ?(UFS 3.1)
52%

183.3
-19%
158.5
-30%
244.85
8%
228 ?(99.7 - 291, n=32)
1%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years)
23%
Random Write 4KB
213.44
156.69 ?(UFS 4.0)
-27%

130.26 ?(UFS 3.1)
-39%

161.1
-25%
168.7
-21%
267.41
25%
238 ?(99.2 - 319, n=32)
12%
311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years)
46%

Gaming

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Fairphone 5; Dead Trigger 2; 1.10.0: Ø59.9 (59-60)
Fairphone 5; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.2.1_18831865_18963989: Ø53.8 (35-61)
Fairphone 5; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 4.2.1_18831865_18963989: Ø40 (27-58)
Fairphone 5; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.2.1_18831865_18963989: Ø39.8 (21-61)
Fairphone 5; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.9.0: Ø59.3 (50-61)
Fairphone 5; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.9.0: Ø39.6 (32-41)
Fairphone 5; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.9.0: Ø39.8 (38-41)

排放量 - 变热，但保持稳定

温度

在负载情况下，Fairphone 5 的表面温度会变得很高，这是用烧毁基准来模拟的，但它们仍然保持在可接受的范围内。

在压力下，SoC 可以有效散热，防止性能大幅下降。

Max. Load
 47 °C46 °C40 °C 
 48.1 °C46.6 °C41 °C 
 48.2 °C43 °C40.2 °C 
Maximum: 48.2 °C
Average: 44.5 °C
38.9 °C45.4 °C47.3 °C
40.6 °C40.9 °C49.7 °C
36.1 °C40.8 °C48.9 °C
Maximum: 49.7 °C
Average: 43.2 °C
Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 %
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.4 % -16%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.6 % -31%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Fairphone 5
Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 %
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 % -21%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.8 % -46%
0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.32 (5.32-5.33)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.09 (4.08-4.1)
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.5 (18.4-18.6)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.6 (14.6-14.7)
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø18.7 (18.6-18.8)

发言人

Fairphone 5 的两个扬声器音质适中。中等音量时，音质会显得空洞和尖锐，音量越大，这种情况就越明显，从而导致失真。

要扩大声音输出，建议使用 USB 或蓝牙，后者提供广泛的音频编解码支持。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.937.52529.630.73123.722.64035.626.45038.642.36324.230.78018.923.410018.926.712515.733.916013.946.620014.745.625015.250.431512.957.840011.459.750012.767.363012.274.380011.578.1100011.679.4125013.674.9160012.869.420001370.6250012.769.4315012.776400012.977.8500013.478630013.475.4800013.969.31000013.663.71250013.663.41600013.754SPL25.187.1N0.669.4median 13.4median 69.4Delta0.710.433.839.127.936.924.332.928.234.636.742.822.238.925.439.52141.918.646.715.453.515.155.613.160.11262.412.762.911.866.912.966.710.471.513.375.913.278.412.178.912.281.212.981.414.88115.881.716.180.714.481.813.67913.576.814.471.41567.825.991.50.788median 13.5median 75.91.39.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseFairphone 5Samsung Galaxy S23
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Fairphone 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 仅 4,200 毫安时，耗电量大

耗电量

Fairphone 5 在各种情况下都表现出较高的耗电量，这表明它的电池续航能力并不特别突出。

虽然 Fairphone 没有提供有关支持的充电技术的详细信息，但他们提到使用 30 瓦的电源装置可在 20 分钟内将电池电量充至 50%。一个积极的方面是，用户无需工具即可更换电池。遗憾的是，Fairphone 5 不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.44 / 0.23 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.42 / 2.43 / 2.47 Watt
Load midlight 8.95 / 9.99 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Fairphone 5
4200 mAh		Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm QCM6490
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
38%
57%
46%
0%
28%
Idle Minimum *
1.42
0.56
61%
0.57
60%
0.97
32%
1.42 ?()
-0%
0.882 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years)
38%
Idle Average *
2.43
1.08
56%
0.74
70%
1.13
53%
2.43 ?()
-0%
1.448 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years)
40%
Idle Maximum *
2.47
1.17
53%
0.83
66%
1.44
42%
2.47 ?()
-0%
1.603 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years)
35%
Load Average *
8.95
8.01
11%
4.26
52%
3.26
64%
8.95 ?()
-0%
6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years)
27%
Load Maximum *
9.99
8.89
11%
6.16
38%
6.29
37%
9.99 ?()
-0%
9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years)
1%

* ... smaller is better

Leistungsaufnahme: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.61 (1.559-10.3)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.56 (0.976-7.72)
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.702 (1.62-1.838)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.899 (0.824-1.465)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.87 (5.44-7.13)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.66 (3.3-5.13)
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.702 (1.62-1.838)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.899 (0.824-1.465)

电池寿命

尽管在同类产品中，Fairphone 5 的电池容量并不是最小的，但在调整显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）的 WLAN 实际测试中，它的表现却明显落后。

这一点在日常使用中也很明显。电池电量消耗很快，尤其是在使用手机时。不过，Fairphone 5 在待机模式下还是很经济的。可以想象，制造商通过一两次升级就能改善这一状况。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 119)
9h 35min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Fairphone 5
4200 mAh
575 min
Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh
814 min
Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh
926 min
Nokia G42
5000 mAh
933 min
Fairphone 4
3905 mAh
804 min

Pros

+ 人与环境的可持续理念
+ 许多维修工作可以自己完成
+ 长期更新供应
+ 长期保修
+ eSIM、USB 3.2 和 microSD

Cons

- 显示屏的校准可以做得更好
- 扬声器较弱
- 负载时表面温度较高
- 电池运行时间适中

评语 - 无怨无悔的智能手机

正在评测的 Fairphone 5。测试设备由德国 Fairphone 提供。
正在评测的 Fairphone 5。测试设备由德国 Fairphone 提供。

Fairphone 5 是目前最具可持续性的智能手机之一，它强调在生产和原材料提取过程中公平对待人类。它承诺采用高比例的可回收元件、五年保修和八年更新，体现了可持续发展的典范。典范！

Fairphone 5 是一款值得称赞的日常伴侣，它融合了社会责任和最小的生态影响。

Fairphone 5 拥有多项技术功能，包括频率范围宽广的 5G、6 GHz WLAN、microSD 和 eSIM 支持。USB 3.2 端口提供有线图像输出，尽管复制速度相对较慢。UWB 和无线充电功能不在其列，而且该设备没有防尘和防水认证。不过，它的模块化设计允许用户在不同区域进行维修。

Fairphone 5 的 OLED 显示屏亮度可略有提高，改进校准可增强其整体性能。视角不同，显示屏会呈现绿色。虽然扬声器可能不是特别令人印象深刻，尤其是在音量较大时，但它们仍能达到目的。考虑到中端芯片组已经使用了两年，八年的跨度可能会带来寿命方面的挑战，人们对 SoC 的评价不一。

如果您的首选是一款公平、可持续生产、100% 可回收的通讯工具，那么 Fairphone 5 将是您的不二之选。只有 像素 8的升级幅度更大。三星也非常重视可维修性，已经为 Galaxy S23等设备提供了同等的自修工具包。

价格和供应情况

Fairphone 5 可直接从制造商的在线商店购买。也可从亚马逊购买。

Fairphone 5 - 11/30/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
55 / 70 → 79%
Weight
88%
Battery
88%
Display
88%
Games Performance
58 / 64 → 91%
Application Performance
80 / 86 → 93%
Temperature
83%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
58%
Average
78%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Fairphone 5 评测--8 年更新、5 年保修的可持续智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-12- 1 (Update: 2023-12- 1)