Fairphone 5 评测--8 年更新、5 年保修的可持续智能手机
Fairphone 5 是继 Fairphone 4.
这家荷兰企业在 Fairphone 5 上更进一步,注重更高的调制程度、更公平的贸易和更多的可回收组件。所有这些都旨在使 Fairphone 5 成为世界上最公平、最可持续的智能手机。
它的价格较高,约为 750 美元,但它也拥有更多的技术。请继续阅读,了解 Fairphone 5 在日常生活中的表现。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.2 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Fairphone 5 QCM6490, Adreno 643 | 212 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.46" | 2700x1224 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Google Pixel 8 Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7 | 187 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.20" | 2400x1080 | |
90.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy S23 SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740 | 167 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" | 2340x1080 | |
78.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Nokia G42 SD 480+, Adreno 619 | 194 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.56" | 1612x720 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 回收塑料、怀旧元素和大猩猩玻璃
Fairphone 5 的屏占比高达 83%,也许不会给人留下超现代的印象,但它的设计简洁、美观。磨砂铝边框不易沾染指纹,智能手机有磨砂黑、天蓝和透明三种颜色可供选择。我们的测试设备使用的是透明款。
Fairphone 5 的机身重量减轻了一些,卡扣式机背增添了一丝怀旧感。背面由 18 个小塑料齿固定,需要用力才能松开,并小心地重新锁紧。盖子下面是可更换电池,取下后即可轻松触及。然后才是 nano-SIM 卡插槽和 microSD 卡插槽,这两个插槽都配有弹出机制。
在材料选择方面,Fairphone 5 非常重视可回收材料。值得注意的是,Fairphone 5 中 94% 的铝、82% 的镁、77% 的铟和 69% 的塑料都来自回收材料。锡、铜、镍和稀土的回收比例也相对较高。原材料的来源是另一个关键因素。Fairphone 5 采用的原材料(金:100%;钴:100%;银:100%;锂:99%;钨:99%)均来自非危机地区。供应商必须遵守安全和人道的工作条件标准(SA8000 和 ISO45001),智能手机的制造过程使用 100% 的可再生能源。
对于有兴趣进一步拆卸的用户,拆卸过程非常简单,只需使用十字螺丝,无需胶水。12 颗银色螺丝可以连接 USB 端口、扬声器、摄像头和卡槽。八颗黑色螺丝用于固定正面,在更换显示屏或前置摄像头时需要拧松。这种设计让许多用户可以自己进行常见的维修,提高了可维修性。值得注意的是,这款智能手机并不防水。不过,它的防护等级达到了 IP55,可以从任何角度防止灰尘和水柱的侵入。
连接性 - USB 3.2,支持 microSD
Fairphone 5 拥有标准功能。USB 3.2 端口(Gen.1)的运行速度高达 5 GBit/s,但在复制测试中表现较慢(139.55 MB/s)。在支持 OTG 的同时,该智能手机还支持有线图像输出,但仅限于屏幕镜像。由于 USB 端口不能识别 exFAT 或 NTFS,用户在将外置硬盘连接到智能手机时应确保格式正确。
该手机也没有 UWB 芯片、无线充电或专用安全芯片。
microSD 读卡器
值得注意的是,它还集成了 microSD 卡插槽,树立了典范。虽然它在跨平台磁盘测试中的表现令人印象深刻,但在复制测试中的传输速率却低于平均水平。与 USB 端口不同,microSD 卡插槽支持 exFAT 文件系统。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Nokia G42 (Angelbird V60) | |
Fairphone 5 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Sony Xperia 10 V (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 - Fairphone 5 的最长更新保证期
Fairphone 5 预装了谷歌Android 13,预计至少在八年内会收到安全补丁和五次重大更新。 Android 因此,18 可以预见。
除谷歌应用程序外,智能手机上只有 "我的 Fairphone"应用程序,该程序收集有关技术状态的基本信息,并提供直接获取支持的途径。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 良好的跟踪性能和 6 GHz 无线局域网
Wi-Fi 6E 可用于家庭 Wi-Fi,也包括使用 6 GHz 频段。结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,Fairphone 5 不仅实现了很高的传输速率,而且基本稳定。
Fairphone 最多可通过 5G Sub5 接入数据网络,并提供极其广泛的频率支持。在大都市环境中接收特性良好,数据传输速率也达到了预期水平。
Networking | |
Fairphone 5 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Nokia G42 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Fairphone 4 | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
在室外,跟踪非常快速和精确,而在室内,则需要更长的时间,尤其是在 Fairphone 5 确定准确位置之前。不过,一旦确定位置,它就会非常精确。
这些特点在我们的短途试驾中也很明显,因为这款智能手机准确地记录了行驶路线,可与 Garmin Venu 2 直接比较。
电话功能和语音质量
当把 Fairphone 5 放在耳边时,它的语音质量很好,能可靠地过滤掉轻微的背景噪音。如果周围环境变得嘈杂,降噪功能就会达到极限,使说话者的声音大大减弱,并让背景噪音反复穿透。扬声器模式工作正常,只有轻微的混响效果。
Fairphone 有一个实体 nano-SIM 卡空间,也可以安装 eSIM 卡作为替代,以实现双 SIM 卡操作。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能。
摄像头 - Fairphone 5 配备了带 ToF 功能的出色双摄像头
Fairphone 5 的前置摄像头高达 5000 万像素,但采用了像素分选技术,最终成像只有 1250 万像素。画质尚可,但白天图像锐化严重,暗光下对比度较低。
背面的两个镜头也是各 5000 万像素,但它们的传感器不同。主镜头来自索尼,具有光学防抖功能。它能拍摄出相当不错的照片,尽管图像的动态范围应该更大一些。虽然超广角镜头很早就出现了噪点,但由于分辨率高,它在外围区域的成像性能也很稳定,细节也很丰富。该镜头也可用于微距拍摄,但会出现严重的虚化现象。变焦不是 Fairphone 的强项。
Fairphone 5 能以 30 FPS 的超高清速度录制双面视频。另外,全高清(或高清)也有 60 FPS。遗憾的是,只提供 16:9 格式,而且也不提供 24 FPS 的帧速率。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light配件和保修 - 注册后可使用五年
免费注册 Fairphone 5 后,智能手机的保修期将从 24 个月延长至五年,这在智能手机领域是绝无仅有的。
除了智能手机外,包装盒里仍然空空如也;甚至连充电线都没有。制造商解释说,大多数人已经拥有了最必要的配件。保护盖(每个约 43 美元)和屏幕保护膜(约 36 美元)可供选择。用户还可以在商店里购买备件,自行更换。
输入设备和操作 - Fairphone 5,最高 300 Hz
Fairphone 5 的电容式触摸屏采样率相对较高,达到 300 Hz,具有良好的滑动性能和可靠的响应。
边框或电源按钮上的指纹传感器确保了生物识别安全。识别率高,解锁速度快。通过前置摄像头进行面部识别的速度明显更快,但安全性也较低。
线性振动电机可提供精确而有吸引力的触觉反馈,声音可闻但不会太大。
显示屏 - 90-Hz OLED,带直流调光功能
Fairphone 5 的 6.49 英寸 OLED 显示屏像素密度高,显示内容清晰。制造商指定的亮度高达 800 cd/m²,但我们在测试中并未达到这一水平,相反,在纯白显示屏上,无论环境光传感器是否激活,平均亮度都为 617 cd/m²。在 APL18 测量中,峰值也保持在类似水平;在显示 HDR 内容时,我们只能测量到 721 cd/m²。
最低亮度时,显示屏以 90 Hz 的频率持续闪烁;亮度稍高时,频率会翻倍。不过,频率非常均匀,因此出现投诉的风险很低,但我们不能排除这种可能性。可选的直流调光模式除了使面板变得稍暗之外,没有任何可识别或可测量的效果。事实上,直流调光似乎一直处于激活状态。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 620 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.85
Fairphone 5 OLED, 2700x1224, 6.5" | Google Pixel 8 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.2" | Samsung Galaxy S23 Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.1" | Nokia G42 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Fairphone 4 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 67% | 35% | -40% | -2% | |
Brightness middle | 620 | 1450 134% | 1125 81% | 495 -20% | 513 -17% |
Brightness | 617 | 1410 129% | 1122 82% | 452 -27% | 492 -20% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 92 -5% | 96 -1% | 84 -13% | 88 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.54 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 1.1 68% | 3.2 6% | 6.09 -79% | 2.96 13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5 | 4.2 16% | 4.9 2% | 9.35 -87% | 5.55 -11% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 2.1 60% | 3.3 37% | 5.8 -12% | 3.6 31% |
Gamma | 1.85 119% | 2.24 98% | 1.97 112% | 2.325 95% | 2.321 95% |
CCT | 6390 102% | 6584 99% | 6504 100% | 8169 80% | 6032 108% |
Contrast | 990 | 950 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 90 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列
当我们使用 AMOLED 设置选择高级色彩模式并调整色温时,我们可以获得最佳的色彩表现(见上图)。然后,Fairphone 5 使用更大的 DCI-P3 色彩空间,但灰度显示偏绿。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.884 ms rise | |
↘ 0.7695 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.547 ms rise | |
↘ 10.37 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
在室外,Fairphone 5 给人的印象不错。在阴天,显示屏更容易阅读,但在夏天,只有少数几个保护区可以使用。
性能 - 配备长寿命 SoC 的 Fairphone 5
Fairphone 5 的 SoC 采用了一种不同寻常的解决方案:高通 QCM6490。 高通 QCM6490.这种芯片组实际上是为物联网产品而开发的,与 骁龙 778G.QCM6490 的优势在于它是一款长寿命的 SoC,因此高通公司会在更长的时间内提供更新,使 Fairphone 操作系统的长更新周期成为可能。
不过,这款 SoC(2021 年推出)并非全新产品,它属于中高端产品,拥有 8 GB LPDDR4x 内存。从目前的情况来看,这足以让智能手机毫不费力地处理所有日常任务,但集成的 Adreno 643已经意味着在游戏方面必须做出妥协。现在很难预测三年、四年甚至七年后的情况。不过,从可能的长期使用情况来看,性能似乎还算稳定。
Antutu v9 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=107, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 () | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro |
Antutu v10 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 () |
CrossMark - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=158, last 2 years) | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 () | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Nokia G42 |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 () | |
Nokia G42 |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 () | |
Nokia G42 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia G42 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia G42 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia G42 |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia G42 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia G42 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia G42 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia G42 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Nokia G42 | |
Fairphone 4 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia G42 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Nokia G42 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia G42 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Nokia G42 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Fairphone 4 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia G42 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Nokia G42 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Fairphone 4 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia G42 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Nokia G42 | |
Fairphone 4 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia G42 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Nokia G42 | |
Fairphone 4 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia G42 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Nokia G42 |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Fairphone 5 (Chrome 119) | |
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 () | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111) | |
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Fairphone 5 (Chrome 119) | |
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=153, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111) | |
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Fairphone 5 (Chrome 119) | |
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111) | |
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115) | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Fairphone 5 (Chrome 119) | |
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 () | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) |
* ... smaller is better
Fairphone 5 | Samsung Galaxy S23 | Nokia G42 | Fairphone 4 | Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 45% | -34% | -32% | 12% | -2% | 60% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 965.01 | 3133.7 ? 225% 1686.71 ? 75% | 492.5 -49% | 917 -5% | 1008.77 5% | 887 ? -8% | 1834 ? 90% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 789.23 | 844 ? 7% 628.53 ? -20% | 461.8 -41% | 214.8 -73% | 878.9 11% | 694 ? -12% | 1426 ? 81% |
Random Read 4KB | 226.8 | 427.61 ? 89% 343.65 ? 52% | 183.3 -19% | 158.5 -30% | 244.85 8% | 228 ? 1% | 278 ? 23% |
Random Write 4KB | 213.44 | 156.69 ? -27% 130.26 ? -39% | 161.1 -25% | 168.7 -21% | 267.41 25% | 238 ? 12% | 310 ? 45% |
Gaming
排放量 - 变热,但保持稳定
温度
在负载情况下,Fairphone 5 的表面温度会变得很高,这是用烧毁基准来模拟的,但它们仍然保持在可接受的范围内。
在压力下,SoC 可以有效散热,防止性能大幅下降。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Nokia G42 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Nokia G42 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 |
发言人
Fairphone 5 的两个扬声器音质适中。中等音量时,音质会显得空洞和尖锐,音量越大,这种情况就越明显,从而导致失真。
要扩大声音输出,建议使用 USB 或蓝牙,后者提供广泛的音频编解码支持。
Fairphone 5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S23 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 仅 4,200 毫安时,耗电量大
耗电量
Fairphone 5 在各种情况下都表现出较高的耗电量,这表明它的电池续航能力并不特别突出。
虽然 Fairphone 没有提供有关支持的充电技术的详细信息,但他们提到使用 30 瓦的电源装置可在 20 分钟内将电池电量充至 50%。一个积极的方面是,用户无需工具即可更换电池。遗憾的是,Fairphone 5 不支持无线充电。
Off / Standby | 0.44 / 0.23 Watt |
Idle | 1.42 / 2.43 / 2.47 Watt |
Load |
8.95 / 9.99 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Fairphone 5 4200 mAh | Google Pixel 8 4575 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm QCM6490 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 38% | 57% | 46% | 0% | 29% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.42 | 0.56 61% | 0.57 60% | 0.97 32% | 1.42 ? -0% | 0.895 ? 37% |
Idle Average * | 2.43 | 1.08 56% | 0.74 70% | 1.13 53% | 2.43 ? -0% | 1.447 ? 40% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.47 | 1.17 53% | 0.83 66% | 1.44 42% | 2.47 ? -0% | 1.608 ? 35% |
Load Average * | 8.95 | 8.01 11% | 4.26 52% | 3.26 64% | 8.95 ? -0% | 6.41 ? 28% |
Load Maximum * | 9.99 | 8.89 11% | 6.16 38% | 6.29 37% | 9.99 ? -0% | 9.61 ? 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Leistungsaufnahme: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
尽管在同类产品中,Fairphone 5 的电池容量并不是最小的,但在调整显示屏亮度(150 cd/m²)的 WLAN 实际测试中,它的表现却明显落后。
这一点在日常使用中也很明显。电池电量消耗很快,尤其是在使用手机时。不过,Fairphone 5 在待机模式下还是很经济的。可以想象,制造商通过一两次升级就能改善这一状况。
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
Fairphone 5 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Nokia G42 | |
Fairphone 4 |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 无怨无悔的智能手机
Fairphone 5 是目前最具可持续性的智能手机之一,它强调在生产和原材料提取过程中公平对待人类。它承诺采用高比例的可回收元件、五年保修和八年更新,体现了可持续发展的典范。典范!
Fairphone 5 是一款值得称赞的日常伴侣,它融合了社会责任和最小的生态影响。
Fairphone 5 拥有多项技术功能,包括频率范围宽广的 5G、6 GHz WLAN、microSD 和 eSIM 支持。USB 3.2 端口提供有线图像输出,尽管复制速度相对较慢。UWB 和无线充电功能不在其列,而且该设备没有防尘和防水认证。不过,它的模块化设计允许用户在不同区域进行维修。
Fairphone 5 的 OLED 显示屏亮度可略有提高,改进校准可增强其整体性能。视角不同,显示屏会呈现绿色。虽然扬声器可能不是特别令人印象深刻,尤其是在音量较大时,但它们仍能达到目的。考虑到中端芯片组已经使用了两年,八年的跨度可能会带来寿命方面的挑战,人们对 SoC 的评价不一。
如果您的首选是一款公平、可持续生产、100% 可回收的通讯工具,那么 Fairphone 5 将是您的不二之选。只有 像素 8的升级幅度更大。三星也非常重视可维修性,已经为 Galaxy S23等设备提供了同等的自修工具包。
Fairphone 5
-
11/30/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.