三星Galaxy S23评论。小巧的S23智能手机实现了最大的飞跃
Galaxy S系列中最小的智能手机不仅具有最小的物理尺寸,而且近年来总是比Plus型号稍弱。今年,两个变体之间的唯一区别是UWB芯片,而S23缺乏该芯片。
除此之外,Galaxy 智能手机在外观上与前代产品几乎没有变化,即S22,而且只略有增长,但被赋予了一个更大的电池。继续阅读,在此了解改进的显示屏、新的 骁龙8代2的Galaxy和更大的电池是否证明是成功的。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy S23 SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740 | 167 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" | 2340x1080 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Xiaomi 13 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 189 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.36" | 2400x1080 | |
90.3 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16, A16 GPU 5-Core | 206 g | 256 GB NVMe | 6.10" | 2556x1179 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Vivo X90 Pro Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11 | 214.9 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" | 2800x1260 | |
88.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Google Pixel 7 Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7 | 197 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" | 2400x1080 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Asus Zenfone 9 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 169 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 5.90" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 紧凑而舒适
三星Galaxy S23总共有六种颜色,其中奶油色、幻影黑、绿色和薰衣草色在商店广泛销售,石墨色和青柠色则通过三星商店独家销售。
这款智能手机又可以明确无误地识别为Galaxy 智能手机。然而,三星将摄像头的设计与Ultra机型的设计保持一致。这款手机从外壳上突出了2.3毫米,因此,智能手机在平坦的表面上时,会有轻微的晃动。
制造质量很好。缝隙很紧,非常均匀。S23很容易经受住扭转的压力,但会有轻微的吱吱声。框架由抛光的Armor铝制成,正面和背面的玻璃是康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus 2。它的手感很好,有一种高质量的感觉,但尽管有磨砂的背面,却相当容易沾染指纹。
Galaxy S23又是根据IP68认证,既防尘又防水。
设备 -Galaxy S23,不含UWB
今年,三星Galaxy S23再次利用了USB 3.2(Gen. 1),支持有线图像输出和OTG。后者允许外围设备和外部存储媒体连接到智能手机上。该接口能够实现高数据传输率,在我们的复制测试中实现了252MB/s的传输率。
有128或256GB的存储空间可供选择。我们推荐较大的型号:因为没有microSD插槽,这一方面提供了更大的容量,另一方面,较小的存储变量,即我们的测试设备,仍然有较慢的UFS 3.1存储。三星通知我们,UFS 4.0(到目前为止)不在这种小单元中生产。
S23也没有超宽带芯片(UWB),所以不可能使用三星智能手机的数字键。此外,既没有集成红外发射器、无线电接收器,也没有音频插孔。
软件--三星DeX和漫长的更新周期
三星Galaxy S23配备了谷歌Android 13,在审查时是最新的,并配备了内部的One UI 5.1。与Galaxy S系列的所有智能手机一样,S23也会收到四个系统升级和额外一年的安全补丁。后者每月都会发布,但这种情况是否会持续到最后一年还不完全清楚。话说回来, Galaxy S20仍然每月收到安全补丁,所以这在未来几年不太可能改变。
除了谷歌的应用,三星自己的应用也可以在S23上使用,以及Galaxy App Store。Facebook、Netflix、Spotify和各种微软应用也预装在三星智能手机上。除了OneDrive之外,所有第三方应用都可以完全卸载,而上述应用只能停用。
桌面模式DeX也被支持,既可以通过无线方式使用,也可以通过一个可选的电缆使用。后者的变体工作起来更顺畅。
通信和GNSS - 快速的WLAN和精确的定位
三星Galaxy S23为所有移动通信标准提供了广泛的频率范围,与更昂贵的机型相比,在这方面没有任何妥协。大都市地区的接收值主观上非常好,没有给人以批评的理由。
虽然Galaxy 智能手机不支持Wi-Fi 7,但在我们与华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的测试中,它在5.0和6.0 GHz网络中都取得了非常高和稳定的传输率。
Networking | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
使用三星Galaxy S23进行定位,无论是在户外还是在室内都非常迅速和准确。
为了能够更准确地评估智能手机的定位能力,我们带着它进行了一次短途骑行,在这期间,我们将它与佳明Venu 2。在一条不到10公里的路线上,两台设备的距离只有30米。在对路线的详细总结中,两者的表现都不是很好,显示出一些不准确的地方;Garmin手表总是更准确一点。尽管如此,S23为日常导航任务提供了良好的装备。
电话和语音质量
三星Galaxy S23的电话功能在测试中表现良好。当拿在耳边时,语音质量处于非常好的水平,对于接收者来说,来自大群人的嘈杂背景噪音完全被消除了。扬声器也能带来体面的对话体验,即使用户离S23有两米远,也能正常理解。
支持VoLTE和WiFi通话等功能,但系统中没有实现SIP账户支持。Galaxy 智能手机有两个nano-SIM卡插槽,但也可以使用eSIM卡而不是实体SIM卡。
照相机 -Galaxy S23中的良好的三合一相机
Galaxy S23的前置摄像头已被完全重新设计,现在整个S23系列都是一样的。光学系统再次依靠自动对焦,提供了很多设置和过滤器的选项,并能以每秒60帧的速度录制超高清视频。其结果令人印象深刻。
主摄像头的核心是一个5000万像素的传感器,使用像素分选来生成12.5万像素的图像。图片也可以以全分辨率拍摄。在白天,照片很好,有很高的细节水平,但显得有些过度锐化。当有背光时,对比度也会受到一些影响。照片格式为4:3、16:9、全屏(19.5:9)和1:1。
超广角使用了与S23 Ultra相同的传感器, ,这比去年的机型有明显的改进。然而,景深可以更明显一些,外围区域的锐度明显下降。
第三个镜头是一个三倍光学放大镜,它和主传感器一样,可以利用光学图像稳定(OIS)。白天的照片很好,但分辨率可以再高一点。如果你想更接近拍摄对象,你可以使用30倍数码变焦。最大的放大倍数其实并不适合拍照,但高达10倍的变焦对社交媒体来说是足够的。在低光照情况下,照片会变得非常嘈杂,很少好看。与其他S23机型一样,S23也有专家RAW应用和专业模式。
在最好的情况下,视频以8k记录,最高30FPS,而超高清(最高60FPS)和全高清(最高120FPS)与HDR10+也可用。一些设置可以通过专业模式手动调整,也可以使用21:9的长宽比。
变焦水平(从左):广角(1x),3x,10x,30x
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light在受控的照明条件下,三星Galaxy S23显示出体面的色彩再现。然而,在含有绿色和蓝色元素的颜色中,DeltaE的偏差相当高,而且比它们应该的要亮得多。
测试图的拍摄效果很好,许多小细节都被保留了下来,但并非所有区域的锐度都是最佳的。这种现象更多地发生在孤立的点上,但也不是特别明显。
配件和保修 - 只包括基本的东西
三星Galaxy S23采用非常平坦的盒子包装,这表明除了智能手机之外,几乎没有什么东西包括在内。毕竟,三星在这里使用了完全回收的纸张。打开后,里面只有一条USB-C电缆、一个SIM卡工具和几张薄薄的信息单。电源适配器需要选择购买,在三星商店的建议零售价约为35美元。
S23在德国有24个月的保修期,这在其他地区可能有所不同,所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。
这可以通过Care+保险包来扩展,可以购买一年或两年的保险,还包括额外的盗窃保险。这个保险包的范围也可能因国家而异。例如,在美国,买家可以选择10美元/月(最长36个月),可以随时取消,或者选择189美元的2年计划(在纽约不提供)。当你提出索赔时,可能需要支付99-199美元的免赔额或29-99美元的服务费,而且在12个月内最多可以提出三次保险索赔。
输入设备和操作 - 240赫兹的触摸屏
Galaxy S23的电容式触摸屏的表面具有良好的滑行性能,并以240赫兹的采样率工作。输入的信息被很好地识别,并迅速而准确地执行。
生物识别安全由集成在显示屏上的超声波指纹传感器提供,其作用非常迅速和可靠。此外,也可以通过前置摄像头使用不太安全的面部识别解锁。
电源键被用作功能键,启动内部语言助手Bixby ex works。这也可以在设置中切换回作为经典电源键的功能。此外,相机或任何其他应用程序可以通过按两次电源键来启动。在这方面,S23丝毫不逊于其较大的兄弟姐妹们。
显示 -Galaxy S23的更多亮度
三星Galaxy S23使用6.1英寸(15.49厘米)的AMOLED显示屏,分辨率为2,340 x 1,080(全高清+),因此显示效果清晰。如果你想省电,你可以把分辨率降低到HD+。LTPO面板的刷新率在48和120赫兹之间动态调整;将其固定在60赫兹也是可以选择的。包括的HDR标准有HLG、HDR10和HDR10+,但不包括Dolby Vision。
不像去年的前辈Galaxy S23,与更昂贵的型号相比,不再需要满足于降低的最大亮度。在激活环境光传感器的情况下,在纯白的显示屏上可以达到1122cd/m²的高亮度。随着明亮和黑暗区域的均匀分布(APL18),在测试中这甚至增加到1653 cd/m²。如果你喜欢手动调节亮度,你有高达431 cd/m²的亮度可供选择。通过额外的亮度选项,这可以提高到730cd/m²。最低显示亮度的情况与此类似,在正常情况下,最低亮度为1.24cd/m²,相对较低。如果你打开输入帮助中的额外调光功能,你可以将亮度降低到0.9cd/m²。
像所有的OLED一样,S23的OLED也会闪动。这在最低亮度时以非常稳定的120赫兹发生。亮度增加了一点(>3%),成为一个恒定的240赫兹,周期曲线非常均匀。这表明永久的直流调光,对眼睛来说应该是容易的。没有检测到时间上的抖动。
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1125 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.97
Samsung Galaxy S23 Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.1" | Xiaomi 13 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Apple iPhone 14 Pro Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.1" | Vivo X90 Pro AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8" | Google Pixel 7 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3" | Asus Zenfone 9 AMOLED , 2400x1080, 5.9" | Samsung Galaxy S22 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 26% | 23% | 25% | 21% | 7% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 1125 | 1209 7% | 1046 -7% | 1018 -10% | 936 -17% | 793 -30% | 853 -24% |
Brightness | 1122 | 1208 8% | 1049 -7% | 1026 -9% | 947 -16% | 796 -29% | 858 -24% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 98 2% | 98 2% | 93 -3% | 95 -1% | 97 1% | 96 0% |
Black Level * | |||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 1.2 62% | 1.2 62% | 0.9 72% | 1.3 59% | 1.9 41% | 1.9 41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.9 | 3 39% | 3.1 37% | 2.2 55% | 2.7 45% | 3.4 31% | 3.2 35% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 2.1 36% | 1.7 48% | 1.9 42% | 1.4 58% | 2.3 30% | 1.9 42% |
Gamma | 1.97 112% | 2.26 97% | 2.19 100% | 2.26 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.07 106% |
CCT | 6504 100% | 6504 100% | 6538 99% | 6473 100% | 6664 98% | 6860 95% | 6460 101% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.77 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9365 ms rise | |
↘ 0.836 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6965 ms rise | |
↘ 0.663 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
在户外,三星Galaxy S23给人留下了非常好的印象,在所有照明条件下都有足够的亮度能力。反射是存在的,但不是太明显。
Galaxy S23中的AMOLED面板的可视角度稳定性非常好。在非常平坦的视角下,亮度会有所下降,显示屏会变得更冷。然而,这并不影响日常使用。
性能 -Galaxy S23与定制的SoC
Galaxy S23使用与其两个姐妹型号相同的SoC:骁龙8代2的Galaxy 。骁龙8代2的这个变体 ,是一个具有更高时钟的主核。这两个变种都能利用8GB的LPDDR5x内存。
单核CPU的性能相应地高于竞争对手;只有iPhone在这方面更快。三星智能手机在系统性能方面也提供了非常好的结果,这反映在日常使用中,因为系统的反应非常快,总是能顺利工作。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1267 - 16702, n=8) |
ǞǞǞ 阿德雷诺740能够有非常高的性能。它是否也得到了一个小的性能提升并不完全清楚。在任何情况下,GFXBench的4k测试都支持这一点,因为S23在这项测试中表现出色。然而,在其他测试中,它提供了较弱的结果,这是由于冷却不足造成的。稍后会有更多关于这方面的内容。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
在我们的基准测试中,Galaxy S23的浏览器性能非常好。只有iPhone 14 Pro更快。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (152.9 - 196.3, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79) | |
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106) | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (136 - 197, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79) | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106) | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (145 - 187, n=8) | |
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106) | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (49582 - 64715, n=8) | |
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104) | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (634 - 1533, n=8) | |
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16) |
* ... smaller is better
128GB版本只使用旧的UFS 3.1存储,而256GB型号则使用UFS 4.0。通过比较可以看出,较新标准的性能提升主要是在连续阅读中明显,否则提升不是太明显,这也是由于Galaxy S23中UFS 4.0的写入速度远远低于其能力。
Samsung Galaxy S23 | Xiaomi 13 | Vivo X90 Pro | Google Pixel 7 | Asus Zenfone 9 | Samsung Galaxy S22 | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 117% | 114% | -11% | 49% | -2% | -12% | 24% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3133.7 ? 1686.71 ? | 3454.01 10% | 3866.75 23% | 1280.81 -59% | 1986.97 -37% | 1486 -53% | 1602 ? -49% | 1887 ? -40% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 844 ? 628.53 ? | 2722.77 223% | 2643.38 213% | 879.39 4% | 1776.21 110% | 993 18% | 748 ? -11% | 1471 ? 74% |
Random Read 4KB | 427.61 ? 343.65 ? | 393.81 -8% | 367.89 -14% | 210.47 -51% | 298.46 -30% | 273 -36% | 243 ? -43% | 278 ? -35% |
Random Write 4KB | 156.69 ? 130.26 ? | 536.76 243% | 521.43 233% | 253.92 62% | 398.39 154% | 257.6 64% | 244 ? 56% | 311 ? 98% |
游戏--限制最少的乐趣
ǞǞǞ 阿德雷诺740确保了Galaxy 23的强大游戏性能,我们用GameBench进行了测试。.
像《地铁冲浪》这样的休闲游戏对智能手机来说没有问题,即使是在120赫兹的情况下。射击游戏PUBG Mobile也能以非常稳定的帧率工作。只有《暗黑破坏神:不朽 》有一些小插曲,这很可能是一个优化问题,应该很快就会解决。然而,令人遗憾的是,目前还不能为该游戏选择最高的图形细节级别。
排放物--三星智能手机中的冷却功能较弱
温度
三星Galaxy S23的表面温度在任何时候都保持令人愉快的低水平。即使在持续的负载下,该智能手机也不会变得如此温热。
然而,这是有代价的,因为在3DMark Wild Life(Extreme)的压力测试中,S23并没有被证明是特别稳定的,在较长的时间内失去了30%以上的初始性能。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 |
发言人
三星Galaxy S23的两个扬声器经过AKG的优化,支持杜比全景声。声音质量相对较好,但S23 Ultra在粉红噪声测量图中要好一点。
有线耳机可以连接到USB-C端口,这可能需要一个适配器。蓝牙5.3可以无线使用,但遗憾的是,音频编解码器的支持(SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC和三星无缝(SSC))还有待改进。
Samsung Galaxy S23 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 3,900毫安时的长时间运行
消耗功率
Galaxy S23的耗电量非常低。只有在GFXBench中调整了显示亮度(150cd/m²)的情况下,它才明显高于小米13.
与这两个更大的兄弟姐妹相比,必须做出的妥协是S23的充电功率降低,通过电缆限制在25瓦,需要相对较长的时间,即80分钟才能充满电。无线充电需要更长的时间,因为这时只可能有15瓦的功率。无线PowerShare也在其中。
Off / Standby | 0.02 / 0.11 Watt |
Idle | 0.57 / 0.74 / 0.83 Watt |
Load |
4.26 / 6.16 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh | Xiaomi 13 4500 mAh | Apple iPhone 14 Pro 3200 mAh | Vivo X90 Pro 4870 mAh | Google Pixel 7 4355 mAh | Asus Zenfone 9 4300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -19% | -25% | -90% | -22% | -34% | -48% | -124% | -73% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.57 | 0.76 -33% | 0.56 2% | 0.9 -58% | 0.89 -56% | 1.01 -77% | 0.69 -21% | 1.531 ? -169% | 0.883 ? -55% |
Idle Average * | 0.74 | 1.1 -49% | 1.37 -85% | 2.32 -214% | 1.07 -45% | 1.1 -49% | 1.19 -61% | 1.848 ? -150% | 1.467 ? -98% |
Idle Maximum * | 0.83 | 1.13 -36% | 1.42 -71% | 2.39 -188% | 1.2 -45% | 1.17 -41% | 1.26 -52% | 1.998 ? -141% | 1.621 ? -95% |
Load Average * | 4.26 | 2.99 30% | 3.42 20% | 3.64 15% | 3.27 23% | 3.3 23% | 6.97 -64% | 7.9 ? -85% | 6.58 ? -54% |
Load Maximum * | 6.16 | 6.63 -8% | 5.56 10% | 6.53 -6% | 5.5 11% | 7.89 -28% | 8.85 -44% | 10.7 ? -74% | 9.91 ? -61% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
三星Galaxy S23的电池寿命非常好,尽管它的电池容量相对较小,只有3,900毫安时。
这款三星智能手机还陪同我们参加了世界移动通信大会,并以其耐力给我们带来了积极的惊喜,因为尽管在交易会期间密集使用,但电池在晚间仍然有50%以上的电量。如果你只是零星地使用这款智能手机,你肯定会有足够的电量使用几天,尤其是S23在待机时非常节俭。
Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh | Xiaomi 13 4500 mAh | Apple iPhone 14 Pro 3200 mAh | Vivo X90 Pro 4870 mAh | Google Pixel 7 4355 mAh | Asus Zenfone 9 4300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 14% | 3% | -2% | -24% | 0% | -18% | |
Reader / Idle | 2249 | 2983 33% | 2659 18% | 1063 -53% | 1685 -25% | 2182 -3% | |
H.264 | 1255 | 1221 -3% | 1397 11% | 1230 -2% | 1401 12% | 887 -29% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 926 | 1021 10% | 807 -13% | 909 -2% | 731 -21% | 825 -11% | 675 -27% |
Load | 370 | 423 14% | 351 -5% | 302 -18% | 462 25% | 324 -12% |
Pros
Cons
结论 -Galaxy S23原来是一个强大的升级版
三星Galaxy S23在今年取得了最大的飞跃,赶上了 Galaxy S23+.这一点在显示屏亮度方面尤其明显,现在已经处于同一水平。WLAN标准也进行了调整,但遗憾的是Wi-Fi 7被省略了。
除了更大的显示屏,S23+还提供了一个不成比例的更大的电池,它可以实现更长的运行时间,并且在45瓦的情况下,也可以更快充电。此外,S23仍然没有UWB。
三星Galaxy S23无疑是2023年最好的紧凑型智能手机之一。
在测试中,Galaxy S23的得分是:语音质量好,更新供应时间长,性能强,两边的摄像头都不错。电池运行时间也非常好,LTPO-AMOLED显示屏可以变得非常明亮,但色彩再现并不完全完美。
紧凑的替代品是 华硕Zenfone 9或 小米13.小米13 iPhone 13 mini尤其是更小,但也有技术上的妥协。
价格和可用性
在美国,Galaxy S23的128GB型号起价为S799.99。256GB的价格为999.99美元。
建议用户在亚马逊等流行的转售商处(如适用)看看,在那里可以偶尔以略微便宜的价格买到该智能手机。
Samsung Galaxy S23
- 03/09/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.