Notebookcheck Logo

戴尔G15 5515 Ryzen版回顾。一款经济实惠的FHD游戏笔记本

入门级别。

Ryzen 7 APU和GeForce RTX 3050 Ti笔记本GPU为G15的哑光FHD屏幕带来所有当前游戏的流畅性。这款笔记本电脑包括两个NVMe SSD的空间，并提供出色的电池寿命。只有显示屏不会赢得任何奖项。
AMD Cezanne (Zen 3) Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Windows

通过G15 5515，戴尔在其产品组合中增加了一个来自入门级领域的游戏笔记本电脑。我们在这里测试的设备配置是由一台 Ryzen 7 5800HAPU和一个 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti笔记本GPU。竞争对手包括以下设备 申克XMG Focus 15，以及技嘉G5 KC，以及 联想Legion 5 15ACH.

Dell G15 5515 (G15 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1695 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 90 W TDP, GDDR6, 30.0.14.7212, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE092A, IPS, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1, 512 GB 
, 401 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC3254
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined audio port, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24.9 x 357.26 x 272.11
Battery
56 Wh, 4650 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3 cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee LiveSafe (trial), Microsoft 365 (trial), 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.43 kg, Power Supply: 567 g
Price
1099 Euro
Links
Dell homepage
Dell notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
82.7 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		2.4 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.4 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		2.5 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.2 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		1.9 kg22 mm15.60"1920x1080
80.7 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Gigabyte G5 KC
i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		2.1 kg28 mm15.60"1920x1080

外壳 - G15有一个塑料外壳

G15的外壳没有提供任何高质量的材料，而是由塑料制成。虽然后面五分之一的基本单元保持了深灰色的色调，但其余五分之四和盖子的颜色是浅灰色。浅灰色区域有一些深灰色的色斑（"幻影灰洒"）。电池是内置的。取下机箱底部后，你可以进入内部。

箱子显示出一些良好的做工。缝隙是正确的，我们没有感觉到任何材料的突起或尖锐的边缘。底座和盖子的翘曲程度只是勉强可以接受。 对盖子背面的压力并没有导致图像的任何变化。铰链将盖子紧紧地固定在位置上，但仍然可以用一只手打开盖子。最大打开角度约为135度。

G15的占地面积在我们的比较领域中是最大的，而且该笔记本电脑也是较重的设备之一。这台 申克XMG Focus 15的结构明显更紧凑，重量也减少了500克（约17.6盎司）。

Size Comparison

❌
363 mm 261 mm 26 mm 2.5 kg361 mm 258 mm 28 mm 2.1 kg357.26 mm 272.11 mm 24.9 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 238 mm 22 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - 戴尔G15不提供Thunderbolt技术。

G15提供三个USB-A连接（2个USB 2.0，1个USB 3.2 Gen 1；配备RTX 3060 GPU的型号。3x USB 3.2 Gen 1）和一个USB-C连接（USB 3.2 Gen 2），它通过USB-C支持DisplayPort。因此，与HDMI连接一起，有两个视频输出。你会徒劳地寻找一个存储卡读卡器。

这些连接分布在笔记本电脑的三个侧面。由于视频连接和电源端口被安置在后面，相应的电缆会朝后面跑，不会碍事。

右侧：2个USB 2.0 (A型)
右侧：2个USB 2.0 (A型)
左侧。千兆位以太网，音频组合端口
左侧。千兆位以太网，音频组合端口
背面。USB 3.2 Gen 2（C型，显示端口），USB 3.2 Gen 1（A型），HDMI，电源
背面。USB 3.2 Gen 2（C型，显示端口），USB 3.2 Gen 1（A型），HDMI，电源

沟通

Killer WLAN模块包含一个英特尔芯片（AX200），支持802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax标准。在最佳条件下（附近没有其他WLAN设备，笔记本电脑和服务器PC之间的距离很近）确定的传输率结果非常好。有线网络连接由Realtek公司的RTL8125千兆以太网控制器处理，它完成任务没有任何问题。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1530 (1393min - 1595max) MBit/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1482 (759min - 1594max) MBit/s +2%
Dell G15 5515
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1448 (759min - 1518max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
  (554 - 1659, n=25)
1020 MBit/s -30%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
561 (310min - 825max) MBit/s -61%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell G15 5515
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1437 (1264min - 1567max) MBit/s
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1388 (695min - 1450max) MBit/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1318 (667min - 1344max) MBit/s -8%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
  (630 - 1885, n=25)
1037 MBit/s -28%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
828 (634min - 900max) MBit/s -42%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
Dell G15 5515 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW); iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1436 (1264-1567)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø828 (634-900)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1295 (667-1344)
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1365 (695-1450)
Dell G15 5515 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW); iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1422 (759-1518)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø550 (310-825)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1457 (759-1594)
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1530 (1393-1595)

网络摄像头

0.9MP的网络摄像头创建的图像分辨率为1280 x 720像素。色彩的准确性有所欠缺，颜色与目标有很大偏差。

ColorChecker
24.3 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
18 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
23 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Focus 15: 21.09 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 33.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.6 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
26 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell G15 5515: 19.95 ∆E min: 1.57 - max: 27.81 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.2 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Gigabyte G5 KC: 10.21 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 16.11 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL: 7.91 ∆E min: 0.69 - max: 14.34 ∆E

辅料

笔记本电脑包括通常的文件：快速启动手册和保修信息。

维护

在你卸下机箱底部的所有螺丝后，你可以用撬动工具来松开它，但有些部分固定得很紧。拆下机箱底部可以接触到SSD、WLAN模块、工作内存、电池和风扇。

戴尔G15的内部
戴尔G15的内部

担保

戴尔只为15.6英寸的笔记本电脑提供了一年的保修。将其延长到三年的高级支持将花费约150欧元（约174美元）。

输入设备 - 戴尔笔记本电脑包括键盘照明

键盘

戴尔为G15配备了包括数字块在内的带照明的Chiclet键盘。平坦的按键提供了一个中等的行程和一个清晰的压力点。键盘的阻力还可以。在打字时，键盘有一些最小的摆动，这不会造成任何烦扰。 回车键 "和方向键略小。两段式键盘照明是用一个功能键控制的。总的来说，该键盘适用于日常工作。

触摸板

一个尺寸为10.5 x 6厘米（约4.1 x 2.4英寸）的具有多点触摸功能的ClickPad作为鼠标的替代品。其光滑的表面使手指很容易滑动，而且它对角落里的输入也有反应。该垫子提供了一个短行程和清晰的压力点。

G15输入设备
G15输入设备

显示屏 - 一个120-Hz的IPS面板

15.6英寸显示屏（1920 x 1080像素）的低亮度（261.7 cd/m²）和对比度（772:1）无法给人留下深刻印象。我们认为亮度值高于300 cd/m²和对比度高于1.000:1是好的。虽然120-Hz面板提供了快速的响应时间，但它无法跟上竞争对手的数值，后者配备的是144或165-Hz面板。

在99%和更低的亮度水平下，显示屏闪烁的频率为200赫兹。由于这个频率相当低，这可能会导致一些敏感用户的头痛或眼睛问题。

276
cd/m²		263
cd/m²		241
cd/m²
265
cd/m²		278
cd/m²		235
cd/m²
277
cd/m²		283
cd/m²		237
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE092A tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 283 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 261.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 278 cd/m²
Contrast: 772:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.7
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
40.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.011
Dell G15 5515
BOE092A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
B156HAN12.H, , 1920x1080, 15.6"		SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Gigabyte G5 KC
LM156LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
68%
66%
72%
Display P3 Coverage
39.1
65.4
67%
64.6
65%
68.2
74%
sRGB Coverage
56.9
96.3
69%
95.3
67%
96.7
70%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
40.4
67.5
67%
66.5
65%
69.6
72%
Response Times
46%
39%
49%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
25.2 ?(12.4, 12.8)
13.6 ?(6.8, 6.8)
46%
18 ?(9.2, 8.8)
29%
10 ?(5.2, 4.8)
60%
Response Time Black / White *
16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6)
9.2 ?(4.4, 4.8)
45%
8.8 ?(3.6, 5.2)
48%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
38%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(99)
Screen
25%
39%
2%
Brightness middle
278
350
26%
418
50%
295
6%
Brightness
262
350
34%
376
44%
275
5%
Brightness Distribution
83
96
16%
83
0%
86
4%
Black Level *
0.36
0.3
17%
0.41
-14%
0.23
36%
Contrast
772
1167
51%
1020
32%
1283
66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.74
3.9
32%
1.67
71%
5.21
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
19.63
8.2
58%
3.88
80%
14.03
29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.7
1.6
66%
0.98
79%
1.73
63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.1
5.5
-77%
2.9
6%
9.4
-203%
Gamma
2.011 109%
2.15 102%
2.26 97%
2.046 108%
CCT
6207 105%
7414 88%
6209 105%
8002 81%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
46% / 37%
48% / 44%
41% / 24%

* ... smaller is better

在交付状态下，该显示器呈现出体面的色彩再现，尽管颜色与目标略有偏差。它不存在蓝色色调的问题。校准只会带来色彩准确性的轻微改善。该显示器无法覆盖AdobeRGB（40%）、sRGB（57%）和DCI-P3（39%）色彩空间。

卡尔曼：灰度
卡尔曼：灰度
卡尔曼：饱和度
卡尔曼：饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN：灰度（校准的）。
CalMAN：灰度（校准的）。
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
戴尔G15 5515与sRGB对比
戴尔G15 5515与sRGB对比
子像素网格
子像素网格
戴尔G15 5515 VS AdobeRGB
戴尔G15 5515 VS AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 12.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

IPS面板具有稳定的可视角度，可以从任何位置读取。在户外，只有在太阳光不太亮的情况下才能阅读显示屏。

G15的户外活动
G15的户外活动
视角
视角

性能 - Ryzen电源

通过G15 5515，戴尔提供了一个15.6英寸的游戏笔记本电脑，可以顺利地玩所有当前的游戏。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
系统信息

处理器

的CPU部分 锐龙7 5800HAPU（塞尚）由一个八核处理器组成，以3.2 GHz的基本时钟速度运行。该速度可以通过Turbo提高到4.3 GHz。支持同步多线程（每个核心运行两个线程）。

在短时间内，Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试以3.8 GHz的速度运行，然后时钟速度下降到3.5和3.6 GHz之间。单线程测试运行在3.3至4.2GHz。在电池运行时，CPU在多线程测试中运行在2.1至2.3GHz，在单线程测试中运行在2.1至3.4GHz。

该联想Legion 5 15ACH也配备了Ryzen 7 5800H APU，在多线程应用中比G15略好。其原因在于联想允许 APU有更高的功率限制。

多线程（主电源操作
多线程（主电源操作
单线程（主电源运行）。
单线程（主电源运行）。

我们通过对Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试进行至少30分钟的持续循环，来评估CPU Turbo在主电源运行中是否也被持续使用。Turbo的使用达到了中等水平。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
Dell G15 5515 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1955 (1938.74-1967.83)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2123 (2107.59-2141.44)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1723 (1688.33-1770.15)
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H: Ø1133 (1111.57-1288.95)
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
229 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1968 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
136 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4588 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
554 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1417 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11912 Points
Help
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
89 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
 
59.6 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
57.5 pt
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57 pt
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
43.8 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=188, last 2 years)
21841 Points +83%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13028 Points +9%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11912 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (8812 - 13214, n=29)
11794 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
10816 Points -9%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
6820 Points -43%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=186, last 2 years)
1888 Points +33%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1417 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1410 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1294 - 1441, n=29)
1410 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1390 Points -2%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
1161 Points -18%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8311 Points +81%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5020 Points +9%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4588 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (3430 - 5020, n=31)
4568 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
4307 Points -6%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
2996 Points -35%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
725 Points +31%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
554 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
550 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (502 - 560, n=30)
550 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
536 Points -3%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
450 Points -19%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3421 Points +74%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2119 Points +8%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1968 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1487 - 2119, n=28)
1963 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1770 (1688.33min - 1770.15max) Points -10%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
1289 (1111.57min - 1288.95max) Points -35%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points +21%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (209 - 234, n=29)
228 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
225 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
210 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
188 Points -18%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
389 Seconds * -50%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
278 Seconds * -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (237 - 340, n=29)
260 Seconds * -0%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
259 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
239 Seconds * +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
170.7 Seconds * +34%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85288 MIPS +59%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (45773 - 59986, n=28)
54117 MIPS +1%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53762 MIPS
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53239 MIPS -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
47642 MIPS -11%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
33075 MIPS -38%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6304 MIPS +14%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5538 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5038 - 5632, n=29)
5472 MIPS -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5448 MIPS -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
5164 MIPS -7%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
4897 MIPS -12%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15012 Points +102%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
9073 Points +22%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (6551 - 9062, n=28)
7793 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7508 Points +1%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7441 Points
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
6332 Points -15%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
6332 Points -15%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1891 Points +30%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1480 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1462 Points +1%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1453 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1336 - 1505, n=28)
1450 Points 0%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
1214 Points -16%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
1214 Points -16%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.5 fps +64%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15 fps +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (11.6 - 16.1, n=29)
14.5 fps +1%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.3 fps
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.7 fps -4%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
9.31 fps -35%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
113 s * -6%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
107 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (47.4 - 113, n=29)
64.3 s * +40%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
50.6 s * +53%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.3 s * +56%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=182, last 2 years)
47.3 s * +56%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
0.645 sec * -25%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.601 sec * -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.539 sec * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (0.511 - 0.559, n=28)
0.525 sec * -1%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.518 sec *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.438 sec * +15%

* ... smaller is better

系统性能

该系统运行平稳而迅速，为所有通常的应用领域提供足够的计算能力。专用的GPU允许使用电脑游戏和其他GPU重的应用程序。这也伴随着非常好的PC Mark结果。

工作存储器以双通道模式运行。
工作存储器以双通道模式运行。
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4870 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5361 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5713 points
PCMark 10 Score
6098 points
Help
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)
7791 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6648 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6478 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6098 - 6493, n=2)
6296 Points +3%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
6098 Points
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
5968 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)
10841 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
10396 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10171 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9631 - 10213, n=2)
9922 Points +3%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
9631 Points
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
8945 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)
9900 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9728 Points +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8625 - 9199, n=2)
8912 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8639 Points 0%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
8625 Points
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
7956 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)
12077 Points +63%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8399 Points +13%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
8106 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7884 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7408 - 7907, n=2)
7658 Points +3%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
7408 Points
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		Gigabyte G5 KC
i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 		Average of class Gaming
 
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Memory Write
34820
32860
-6%
39449
13%
34405 ?(33990 - 34820, n=2)
-1%
66867 ?(22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
92%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Memory Read
43850
42436
-3%
40220
-8%
43746 ?(43641 - 43850, n=2)
0%
69101 ?(23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
58%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Memory Latency *
78.3
81.1
-4%
57.5
27%
79 ?(78.3 - 79.7, n=2)
-1%
94 ?(59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
-20%
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Memory Copy
38595
36925
-4%
35357
-8%
38305 ?(38015 - 38595, n=2)
-1%
65204 ?(21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
69%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -4%
6% / 6%
-1% / -1%
50% / 50%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

标准化的延迟监测测试（网络冲浪、4k视频再现、Prime95高负荷）在DPC延迟方面没有发现任何明显的问题。该系统似乎适用于视频和音频实时处理。这一声明涉及到我们的测试单元，其软件在我们测试时是有效的。未来的更新可能会带来一些改进，或使情况变得更糟。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
703 μs * -8%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
648 μs *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
564 μs * +13%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
480 μs * +26%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

三星的NVMe SSD（M.2 2230；M.2 2280型号也适用）作为系统驱动器。它提供512GB的存储空间，并提供良好的传输速率。笔记本电脑也能接受第二个NVMe固态硬盘（M.2 2230或M.2 2280）。

然而，我们的测试装置缺乏插入第二个固态硬盘（型号：0X8MY9）所需的夹具。这是一个可移动的螺纹，允许你固定和拧下M.2 SSD的背面。如果你需要这个螺纹，你需要向戴尔的支持部门了解是否有这个螺纹，或者我们也能从其他供应商，如亚马逊、易趣和阿里巴巴，找到这个零件。

一个NVMe SSD作为系统驱动器。
一个NVMe SSD作为系统驱动器。
有空间可以放置第二块NVMe SSD。
有空间可以放置第二块NVMe SSD。
拧下固态硬盘的夹具（0X8MY9）。
拧下固态硬盘的夹具（0X8MY9）。
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3113 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1553 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 503 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 374.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1765 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1235 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119.9 MB/s
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1		Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV		SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB		Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4		Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
41%
69%
28%
12%
Write 4K
119.9
124.6
4%
238.3
99%
133.7
12%
158.3 ?(119.9 - 184.4, n=3)
32%
Read 4K
45.3
54.2
20%
55.6
23%
46.88
3%
50.5 ?(45.3 - 53.5, n=3)
11%
Write Seq
1235
2706
119%
3013
144%
2509
103%
1528 ?(1235 - 1777, n=3)
24%
Read Seq
1765
2298
30%
2879
63%
2209
25%
1820 ?(1686 - 2009, n=3)
3%
Write 4K Q32T1
374.3
499.7
34%
569
52%
373.7
0%
459 ?(374 - 516, n=3)
23%
Read 4K Q32T1
503
570
13%
715
42%
528
5%
574 ?(503 - 671, n=3)
14%
Write Seq Q32T1
1553
2999
93%
3287
112%
2511
62%
1557 ?(1201 - 1918, n=3)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3113
3461
11%
3561
14%
3440
11%
2815 ?(2216 - 3115, n=3)
-10%
AS SSD
38%
58%
53%
8%
Seq Read
2555
2960
16%
2988
17%
2972
16%
2593 ?(2555 - 2629, n=3)
1%
Seq Write
1791
2586
44%
2541
42%
2276
27%
1782 ?(1708 - 1847, n=3)
-1%
4K Read
37.8
46.84
24%
42.82
13%
55.7
47%
44.2 ?(37.8 - 48.1, n=3)
17%
4K Write
86.7
96.1
11%
87
0%
131.2
51%
131.6 ?(86.7 - 160.2, n=3)
52%
4K-64 Read
1273
854
-33%
2096
65%
1775
39%
1117 ?(824 - 1273, n=3)
-12%
4K-64 Write
926
2015
118%
2455
165%
2051
121%
899 ?(760 - 1012, n=3)
-3%
Access Time Read *
0.164
0.048
71%
0.068
59%
0.091
45%
0.1287 ?(0.079 - 0.164, n=3)
22%
Access Time Write *
0.044
0.094
-114%
0.043
2%
0.028
36%
0.03133 ?(0.024 - 0.044, n=3)
29%
Score Read
1566
1197
-24%
2437
56%
2128
36%
1421 ?(1137 - 1566, n=3)
-9%
Score Write
1192
2370
99%
2797
135%
2410
102%
1209 ?(1091 - 1345, n=3)
1%
Score Total
3522
4170
18%
6452
83%
5595
59%
3323 ?(2774 - 3672, n=3)
-6%
Copy ISO MB/s
1899
2064
9%
1667 ?(1163 - 1938, n=3)
-12%
Copy Program MB/s
281.6
873
210%
376 ?(282 - 547, n=3)
34%
Copy Game MB/s
854
1503
76%
894 ?(835 - 993, n=3)
5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
40% / 39%
64% / 62%
41% / 42%
10% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
93.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
72.8 pt
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
69.4 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
56.9 pt
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
 
50.1 pt
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
46.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=163, last 2 years)
3478 MB/s +86%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2648 (2638.43min - 2648.49max) MB/s +41%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2207 (2052.27min - 2206.83max) MB/s +18%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2179 (2114.52min - 2178.57max) MB/s +16%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1873 (1707.98min - 1872.94max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1476 - 2002, n=3)
1784 MB/s -5%
seq write
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=163, last 2 years)
3810 MB/s +135%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2820 (2814.8min - 2820.25max) MB/s +74%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2597 (2465.83min - 2597.11max) MB/s +60%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2511 (2505.49min - 2510.72max) MB/s +55%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1620 - 1766, n=3)
1697 MB/s +5%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1620 (1315.87min - 1620.14max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=163, last 2 years)
6322 MB/s +113%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3554 (3305.84min - 3554.04max) MB/s +20%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
3472 (3344.96min - 3471.81max) MB/s +17%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
3260 (2957.4min - 3260.02max) MB/s +10%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
2971 (2662.21min - 2971.11max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (2133 - 3028, n=3)
2711 MB/s -9%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=163, last 2 years)
4867 MB/s +179%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3318 (3298.4min - 3318.4max) MB/s +90%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2992 (2831.78min - 2991.8max) MB/s +71%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2509 (2500.05min - 2509.05max) MB/s +44%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1745 (1716.18min - 1745.18max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1188 - 1791, n=3)
1575 MB/s -10%
4k q1 t1 read
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=163, last 2 years)
66 MB/s +58%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (41.9 - 53.4, n=3)
48.2 MB/s +15%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
47.3 (45.61min - 47.26max) MB/s +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
42.3 (41.29min - 42.34max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
42.1 (42min - 42.06max) MB/s 0%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
41.9 (40.83min - 41.93max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=163, last 2 years)
222 MB/s +113%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (104 - 185.5, n=3)
157.5 MB/s +51%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
137 (137.12min - 137.44max) MB/s +32%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
119 (118.14min - 119.03max) MB/s +14%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
104 (103.47min - 103.94max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
93.4 (93.15min - 93.37max) MB/s -10%
4k q32 t16 read
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=163, last 2 years)
2579 MB/s +89%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
1887 (1882.56min - 1887.17max) MB/s +39%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
1714 (1711.42min - 1713.54max) MB/s +26%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1362 (1077.22min - 1361.69max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (871 - 1390, n=3)
1208 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
645 (600.09min - 644.91max) MB/s -53%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2668 (2657.73min - 2668.24max) MB/s +147%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2385 (2367.13min - 2384.72max) MB/s +121%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=163, last 2 years)
2132 MB/s +98%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1898 (1607.66min - 1897.67max) MB/s +76%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1078 (929.48min - 1077.95max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (858 - 1078, n=3)
994 MB/s -8%
AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6760 Points +92%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6452 Points +83%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
5595 Points +59%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4170 Points +18%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
3522 Points
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (2774 - 3672, n=3)
3323 Points -6%
Score Read
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2452 Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2437 Points +56%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2128 Points +36%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1566 Points
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1137 - 1566, n=3)
1421 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1197 Points -24%
Score Write
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3118 Points +162%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2797 Points +135%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2410 Points +102%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2370 Points +99%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1091 - 1345, n=3)
1209 Points +1%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1192 Points
Seq Read
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4942 MB/s +93%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2988 MB/s +17%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2972 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2960 MB/s +16%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (2555 - 2629, n=3)
2593 MB/s +1%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
2555 MB/s
Seq Write
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3756 MB/s +110%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2586 MB/s +44%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2541 MB/s +42%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2276 MB/s +27%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1791 MB/s
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1708 - 1847, n=3)
1782 MB/s -1%
4K Read
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65.3 MB/s +73%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
55.7 MB/s +47%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
46.84 MB/s +24%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (37.8 - 48.1, n=3)
44.2 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
42.82 MB/s +13%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
37.8 MB/s
4K Write
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s +145%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (86.7 - 160.2, n=3)
131.6 MB/s +52%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
131.2 MB/s +51%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
96.1 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
87 MB/s 0%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
86.7 MB/s
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2096 MB/s +65%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1887 MB/s +48%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
1775 MB/s +39%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1273 MB/s
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (824 - 1273, n=3)
1117 MB/s -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
854 MB/s -33%
4K-64 Write
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2533 MB/s +174%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2455 MB/s +165%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2051 MB/s +121%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2015 MB/s +118%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
926 MB/s
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (760 - 1012, n=3)
899 MB/s -3%
Access Time Read
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
0.164 ms *
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (0.079 - 0.164, n=3)
0.1287 ms * +22%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
0.091 ms * +45%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
0.068 ms * +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05542 ms * +66%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.048 ms * +71%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.094 ms * -114%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04837 ms * -10%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
0.044 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
0.043 ms * +2%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (0.024 - 0.044, n=3)
0.03133 ms * +29%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
0.028 ms * +36%

* ... smaller is better

Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

RTX 3000 GPU的实际性能取决于几个因素：冷却、存储设备，以及笔记本电脑制造商在Nvidia定义的限制范围内配置的最大TGP。戴尔已经配置了 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti笔记本GPU (所有RTX 3050 Ti笔记本电脑的概述，包括TGPs)的最大TGP为90瓦（80瓦+10瓦的动态提升）。然而，动态提升似乎用得很少或根本没有用--至少这是Witcher 3 测试所显示的。

3DMark的结果与以下产品处于同一水平 申克XMG Focus 15.这两款设备的结果都略高于RTX 3050 Ti的平均值。RTX 3050 Ti能够使用快速的GDDR6图形存储（4096 MB）。而 Vega 8集成在处理器中的图形核心是活跃的，而且笔记本电脑使用了Nvidia的Optimus图形切换解决方案。

Fire Strike （主电源操作
Fire Strike （主电源操作
Fire Strike （电池操作）
Fire Strike （电池操作）
Time Spy （主电源操作
Time Spy （主电源操作
3DMark 11 Performance
18252 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
123089 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
43639 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13232 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6072 points
Help
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
73 pt
Gigabyte G5 KC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
49.5 pt
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
42.1 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=181, last 2 years)
43915 Points +121%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
29164 Points +47%
Gigabyte G5 KC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
26654 Points +34%
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
19867 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
19746 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7952 - 20905, n=27)
17562 Points -12%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)
143245 Points +90%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
127491 Points +69%
Gigabyte G5 KC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
124701 Points +65%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
91295 Points +21%
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
75563 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30158 - 102432, n=23)
67913 Points -10%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years)
31443 Points +117%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21806 Points +50%
Gigabyte G5 KC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21009 Points +45%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
14696 Points +1%
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
14518 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7917 - 15611, n=26)
13090 Points -10%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=187, last 2 years)
13142 Points +129%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8844 Points +54%
Gigabyte G5 KC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7997 Points +39%
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5751 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5594 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (3744 - 6122, n=27)
5177 Points -10%

游戏性能

笔记本电脑将当前所有的游戏顺利地带到屏幕上。一般来说，你可以选择全显示分辨率（1920 x 1080像素）和高至最高质量设置。像《赛博朋克2077》这样对性能要求很高的游戏需要在质量水平上做出一些妥协。在RTX 3050 Ti的比较中，帧率略低于平均水平。直接竞争者的数值，即XMG Focus 15的范围在同一水平。

The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | GTA V | Strange Brigade | Red Dead Redemption 2 | F1 2021 | Far Cry 5 | Dirt 5 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 | New World | Far Cry 6
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps +127%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H
80.8 (64min) fps +43%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (Ultra Performance)
71.5 (68min, 68P1 - 76max) fps +26%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (Auto)
67 (64min, 64P1 - 71max) fps +18%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (Eco)
62.8 (59min, 60P1 - 67max) fps +11%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
56.6 (13.2min, 25.5P0.1, 43.4P1 - 105max) fps
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
56 (46min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (19 - 58.5, n=29)
47.5 fps -16%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (33.2 - 220, n=185, last 2 years)
150.6 fps +37%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
145 (126.1min) fps +32%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H
115 (96.6min) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (67.3 - 145, n=27)
113 fps +3%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
110 (96.6min) fps
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
102 (89.6min) fps -7%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=191, last 2 years)
108.4 fps +54%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
91.3 fps +30%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H
78.1 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (48.8 - 100.6, n=27)
77.4 fps +10%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
70.5 fps
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
66.2 fps -6%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=179, last 2 years)
120 fps +118%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (1.3)
78.9 fps +43%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H (1.3)
78.5 fps +43%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
57.1 (38min) fps +4%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (1.3)
55 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (23.5 - 106, n=24)
51.2 fps -7%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=167, last 2 years)
113.8 fps +58%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H
87.4 (4.5min, 58.8P1 - 167max) fps +22%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
81.3 (7.94min, 55.6P1 - 149max) fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
74.5 (24.4min, 50P1 - 144max) fps +4%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
71.8 (21.9min, 52.6P1 - 119max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (27.8 - 75.6, n=26)
63.3 fps -12%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=177, last 2 years)
229 fps +136%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
141 (49.1min, 106P1 - 218max) fps +45%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
97 (70.7min, 76P1 - 145max) fps
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
96.4 (69.9min, 75.5P1 - 148max) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (34.8 - 101.3, n=25)
87.5 fps -10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 High Settings
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
50.8 (35.7min - 71.4max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
50.8 fps 0%
F1 2021 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (27.6 - 271, n=16, last 2 years)
145.2 fps +117%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H (803111)
80.2 (61min, 39P1 - 90max) fps +20%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
67 fps 0%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (807588)
66.8 (55min, 54P1 - 79max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (44.4 - 69, n=11)
54 fps -19%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=101, last 2 years)
131 fps +52%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H
104 fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
86 (76min) fps 0%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
86 (75min - 100max) fps
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
80 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 89, n=14)
68.4 fps -20%
Dirt 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (last 2 years)
89.5 fps +67%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
53.6 (39.8min, 42.7P0.1, 45.1P1 - 88.8max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (40.5 - 54.3, n=5)
49.3 fps -8%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
81 fps +78%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H
76.7 fps +68%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
45.6 (21.7min, 32.2P0.1, 35.3P1 - 84.3max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (39 - 45.6, n=4)
41.8 fps -8%
New World - 1920x1080 Very High Video Quality
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
52.2 (17.7min, 20.2P0.1, 30.7P1 - 93max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (24.9 - 52.2, n=4)
42.5 fps -19%
Far Cry 6 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (35 - 167, n=27, last 2 years)
111.4 fps +110%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (53 - 62, n=2)
57.5 fps +8%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
53 (38min - 65max) fps

为了评估帧率是否在较长的时间内保持基本稳定，我们在全高清分辨率和最大质量设置下运行游戏"TheWitcher 3"约60分钟，不移动游戏角色。我们没有注意到帧率的任何下降。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Dell G15 5515 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø54.9 (50-57)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; Ultra Performance: Ø71.5 (68-76)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; Auto: Ø67 (64-71)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; Eco: Ø62.8 (59-67)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø54.7 (51-57)
Gigabyte G5 KC i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø79.3 (74-84)
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU测量
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU测量
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 174 164 125 71.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 252 163 102 56.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 138 124 116 110
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 132 77.4 55
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 98 85.2 70.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 125 98 92 86
Strange Brigade (2018) 245 138 112 97
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 118.4 75.8 50.8 27
Dirt 5 (2020) 162 84.3 69.1 53.6
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 90.9 45.6 35.6 29.8
F1 2021 (2021) 221 150 131 66.8
New World (2021) 99.3 73.6 68.9 52.2
Far Cry 6 (2021) 107 81 74 53

排放 - G15 5515能够安静地运行

噪声排放

在使用办公室和互联网的日常操作中，这两个风扇以低速运行，几乎听不到声音。偶尔它们会被关闭。在负载情况下，G15仍然明显低于竞争对手的噪音水平，在压力测试中最大水平为48 dB(A)，在Witcher 3 测试中为44 dB(A)。

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 26 / 30 dB(A)
Load
44 / 48 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.336.835.634.841.3253632.135.430.636.53143.340.842.441.245.9403331.232.627.632.550424242.222.1426331.827.825.923.932.88025.120.119.619.331.710024.824.624.322.425.512526.219.817.116.329.516026.119.719.615.929.620028.130.528.720.231.625029.220.717.616.333.331531.523.117.714.934.740031.720.613.312.534.550031.920.71412.335.563032.220.412.311.835.480031.820.61212.535.1100032.620.712.313.436.5125033.718.412.312.937.5160033.818.211.811.537.8200032.618.31211.535.8250032.516.212.11236315033.113.812.71236.1400031.713.712.912.336.3500029.513.512.912.535.463002713.713.112.733.3800024.313.213.312.828.51000020.912.913.312.625.51250019.412.71512.220.51600017.7121311.716.3SPL43.730.125.924.747.6N4.61.30.80.66.2median 31.5median 18.4median 13.1median 12.5median 34.7Delta3.94.22.71.93.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell G15 5515
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		Gigabyte G5 KC
i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-12%
-19%
-30%
-0%
-3%
off / environment *
24
24.2
-1%
24
-0%
27
-13%
24.8 ?(22.8 - 30.5, n=25)
-3%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=152, last 2 years)
-0%
Idle Minimum *
25
29
-16%
25
-0%
31
-24%
25.5 ?(22.9 - 33.3, n=25)
-2%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=153, last 2 years)
-2%
Idle Average *
26
29
-12%
30
-15%
32
-23%
26.5 ?(22.9 - 33.3, n=25)
-2%
27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=153, last 2 years)
-5%
Idle Maximum *
30
29
3%
43
-43%
51
-70%
28.7 ?(22.9 - 43, n=25)
4%
30.3 ?(23 - 47, n=153, last 2 years)
-1%
Load Average *
44
53.5
-22%
56
-27%
57
-30%
41.9 ?(29.9 - 56, n=25)
5%
42.7 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=153, last 2 years)
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44
53.5
-22%
56
-27%
56
-27%
Load Maximum *
48
53.5
-11%
58
-21%
58
-21%
49.3 ?(38.2 - 61.5, n=25)
-3%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=153, last 2 years)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在日常操作中（办公、上网），G15的外壳温度明显保持在绿色范围内。在负载情况下（压力测试，Witcher 3 测试），笔记本电脑会明显升温，但不会过度。虽然一些竞争对手达到的温度有的高有的低，但总的来说，它们之间的差异不大。

ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试

在Prime95和Furmark运行至少一小时的压力测试中，CPU和GPU分别以3.2GHz和1500至1600MHz的速度运行。压力测试代表了一种极端情况，我们用它来评估系统在满负荷时是否也保持稳定。

Max. Load
 50 °C48 °C47 °C 
 41 °C42 °C41 °C 
 34 °C34 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 40.9 °C
47 °C47 °C44 °C
49 °C49 °C40 °C
35 °C40 °C33 °C
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 42.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  48 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		Gigabyte G5 KC
i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
4%
-21%
-15%
-7%
-9%
Maximum Upper Side *
50
42.6
15%
43
14%
50
-0%
46 ?(36 - 54, n=25)
8%
46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=153, last 2 years)
8%
Maximum Bottom *
49
52.2
-7%
46
6%
49
-0%
48.6 ?(35.4 - 60, n=25)
1%
49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=153, last 2 years)
-0%
Idle Upper Side *
26
24.9
4%
39
-50%
33
-27%
30.8 ?(22.4 - 44.8, n=25)
-18%
31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=153, last 2 years)
-20%
Idle Bottom *
26
25.3
3%
40
-54%
34
-31%
31.2 ?(22.6 - 44.1, n=25)
-20%
32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=153, last 2 years)
-24%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

立体声扬声器产生的声音还不错，但缺乏低音。为了获得更好的听觉体验，建议使用耳机或外部扬声器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.836.92530.633.13141.245.14027.633.85022.141.56323.929.28019.325.410022.429.112516.325.516015.928.520020.242.725016.355.931514.962.940012.564.150012.367.163011.867.580012.566.2100013.466.9125012.964.8160011.562.3200011.561.525001262.931501263.8400012.362.6500012.564.4630012.766.3800012.861.41000012.660.61250012.258.81600011.755.7SPL24.776.3N0.640.3median 12.5median 62.6Delta1.96.434.238.134.333.93030.127.330.729.63123.227.520.224.119.624.821.3321835.917.245.818.355.415.159.913.36112.36512.764.911.169.311.572.310.869.311.26911.373.911.270.511.568.91268.812.161.412.262.912.264.412.363.712.165.511.754.524.2810.648.7median 12.2median 64.41.78.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell G15 5515Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell G15 5515 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 一台具有出色电池寿命的游戏笔记本电脑

消耗功率

总的来说，在整个负载范围内，这里使用的硬件的功耗范围在正常水平。积极的一点是，笔记本电脑在空闲运行时消耗的功率明显低于 XMG Focus 15.该电源的额定功率为180瓦。下面的图表显示了笔记本电脑在Witcher 3 测试期间的恒定耗电量。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.9 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5 / 9 / 20 Watt
Load midlight 94 / 172 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

The Witcher 3 Power Consumption

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Dell G15 5515 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø123.3 (118-139)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø174.7 (173-178)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø128 (125-133)
Gigabyte G5 KC i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø166.2 (162-171)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø203 (197-228)
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		Gigabyte G5 KC
i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-22%
-99%
-31%
-14%
-75%
Idle Minimum *
5
7.3
-46%
23
-360%
8
-60%
8.2 ?(2.6 - 23, n=25)
-64%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=152, last 2 years)
-170%
Idle Average *
9
10.5
-17%
25
-178%
13
-44%
12.6 ?(6.5 - 25, n=25)
-40%
19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=152, last 2 years)
-111%
Idle Maximum *
20
15.7
21%
29
-45%
20
-0%
17.2 ?(7.9 - 30, n=25)
14%
26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=152, last 2 years)
-34%
Load Average *
94
108
-15%
106
-13%
98
-4%
92 ?(45.9 - 129, n=25)
2%
106.9 ?(32.1 - 201, n=151, last 2 years)
-14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
123
175
-42%
128
-4%
166
-35%
Load Maximum *
172
228
-33%
156
9%
242
-41%
139.1 ?(63 - 195, n=25)
19%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=152, last 2 years)
-45%

* ... smaller is better

电池寿命

在通过脚本调用网站的WLAN测试和循环运行短片《Big Buck Bunny》（H.264编码，FHD）的视频测试中，这台15.6英寸笔记本电脑的运行时间分别达到了7:58小时和8:49小时。在这两项测试中，笔记本电脑的省电功能被停用，显示屏亮度被调整到大约150cd/m²。此外，在运行视频测试时，通信模块被关闭。

该电池提供56Wh的容量。
该电池提供56Wh的容量。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
13h 27min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 94)
7h 58min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 49min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 31min
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 56 Wh		Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 49 Wh		Gigabyte G5 KC
i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 48.96 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-25%
-48%
-49%
-20%
Reader / Idle
807
387
-52%
314
-61%
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years)
-30%
H.264
529
259
-51%
409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years)
-23%
WiFi v1.3
478
290
-39%
235
-51%
215
-55%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=152, last 2 years)
-21%
Load
91
105
15%
54
-41%
64
-30%
85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years)
-6%

Pros

+ 120-Hz显示面板
+ 高CPU性能
+ 可容纳两个NVMe SSD的空间
+ 能够安静地运行
+ 发光的键盘
+ 非常好的WLAN传输率
+ USB 3.2 Gen 2
+ 卓越的电池寿命

Cons

- 黑暗显示，对比度差
- 色彩空间覆盖率低
- PWM颤动
- 没有安装第二个固态硬盘的框架
- 没有Thunderbolt
- 没有存储卡读卡器
- 只有一年的保修期

结论 - 一个全面的入门级游戏机

戴尔G15 5515（2CMCX），测试单元由cyberport提供。
戴尔G15 5515（2CMCX），测试单元由cyberport提供。

对于我们的测试配置戴尔G15 5515来说，只需花费1050欧元（约合1217美元），你就可以得到一台全面的、装备精良的入门级游戏笔记本电脑。 然而，只有512GB，对于一台游戏笔记本电脑来说，存储量是相当微薄的 - 但你也可以升级。

戴尔G15 5515并没有显示出任何严重的弱点。

这款Ryzen 7 5800HAPU和 GeForce RTX 3050 TiGPU使其能够顺利地运行所有当前的游戏--一般是在FHD分辨率和高至最高质量设置下。在性能发展方面没有问题，APU和GPU能够以高时钟速度持续运行。

虽然笔记本电脑在负载下明显升温，但这并不过分。噪音发展处于同类产品的通常水平。在日常操作中，该设备运行安静，甚至无声无息。戴尔在电池寿命方面值得称赞。 G15的实际数值为8至9小时，甚至超过了一些办公用笔记本电脑。值得抱怨的一点是一年的保修期。以大约1050欧元（约1217美元）的购买价格，它至少应该有两年的保修期。

显示屏（FHD，IPS，120Hz）代表了G15 5515的最大弱点。亮度和对比度低于应有水平，色彩空间覆盖率也太低。此外，该面板显示了一些PWM闪烁。积极的一面是亚光显示表面和体面的色彩再现。

G15的一个替代产品可能是 联想Legion 5 15ACH，它有一个更强大的图形核心和一个整体上更好的显示屏。此外，联想为该笔记本电脑提供了两年的保修期。

价格和可用性

在测试时，配备Ryzen 7 5800H、GeForce RTX 3050 Ti、8GB内存和512GB SSD的戴尔G15在戴尔的售价为 1090美元。，其他配置其他配置也有售。

Dell G15 5515 - 10/12/2021 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
75 / 98 → 76%
Keyboard
79%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
60 / 80 → 75%
Weight
60 / 10-66 → 90%
Battery
79 / 95 → 83%
Display
80%
Games Performance
93%
Application Performance
93%
Temperature
84 / 95 → 88%
Noise
81 / 90 → 90%
Audio
72%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Average
75%
83%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 戴尔G15 5515 Ryzen版回顾。一款经济实惠的FHD游戏笔记本
Sascha Mölck, 2021-10-16 (Update: 2024-11- 4)